Recommendations on the Use of Moisturizing Products Prepared by Spanish Dermatologists Using the Delphi Method. / Recomendaciones sobre el uso de productos hidratantes elaboradas por dermatólogos españoles mediante el método Delphi.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Moisturizing products are widely used in conditions affecting skin hydration. However, the lack of scientific evidence leads to discrepancies and great variability in the recommendations used by different health professionals. The aim of this consensus document is to generate recommendations based on the evidence and experience of dermatologists to unify and facilitate the use of moisturizing products in the routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 49-statement questionnaire on moisturizing products was prepared and, then, arranged in 5 blocks: 1) concept; 2) characteristics, 3) frequency and quantity, 4) product use and areas of application, and 5) special populations. Twenty-two expert dermatologists in the management of patients with eczema answered to the survey using a 2-round Delphi methodology (adding an item on the 2nd round). RESULTS: Consensus was reached on 27 statements (54%), most (n=23) via agreement. The highest level of agreement was reached in the blocks on quantity, product use and areas of application (77.8%), followed by the blocks on characteristics (73%) and frequency (62.5%). Regarding the blocks on concept and special populations, the level of consensus on the items proposed was 37.5% and 10%, respectively. Consensus on the use of emollients for xeroderma (71%) was higher vs atopic dermatitis (64%) and inflamed skin (33.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Consensus recommendations can help all prescribers and improve the available evidence regarding their use.

Core Content for Undergraduate Medical Education in Spain: Recommendations of the Instructors' Group of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV).

BACKGROUND: Skin problems are among the most frequent reasons for seeking medical attention in primary care. In recent years, as a result of the process of adapting medical curricula to the requirements of the European Higher Education Area, the amount of time students spend learning the concepts of dermatology has been reduced in many universities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In order to reach a consensus on core content for undergraduate education in dermatology, we sent a survey to the 57 members of the instructors' group of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV), asking their opinions on what objectives should be set for a dermatology course in Spain. A total of 131 previously selected objectives were listed. We then applied the Delphi method to achieve consensus on which ones the respondents considered important or very important (score≥4 on a Likert scale). RESULTS: Nineteen responses (33%) were received. On the second round of the Delphi process, 68 objectives achieved average scores of at least 4. The respondents emphasized that graduates should understand the structure and functions of the skin and know about bacterial, viral, and fungal skin infections, the most common sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), and the 4 main inflammatory dermatoses. Students should also learn about common complaints, such as itching and bald patches; the management of dermatologic emergencies; purpura and erythema nodosum as signs of internal disease; and the prevention of STDs and skin cancer. During clinical clerkships students should acquire the communication skills they will need to interview patients, write up a patient's medical history, and refer the patient to a specialist. CONCLUSIONS: The AEDV's group of instructors have defined their recommendations on the core content that medical faculties should adopt for the undergraduate subject of dermatology in Spain.

Development of quality indicators to evaluate antibiotic treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia in Indonesia.

OBJECTIVE: To develop an instrument for evaluating the quality of antibiotic management of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) applicable in a middle-income developing country. METHOD: A previous study and Indonesian guidelines were reviewed to derive potential quality of care indicators (QIs). An expert panel performed a two-round Delphi consensus procedure on the QI's relevance to patient recovery, reduction of antimicrobial resistance and cost containment. Applicability in practice, including reliability, feasibility and opportunity for improvement, was determined in a data set of 128 patients hospitalised with CAP in Semarang, Indonesia. RESULTS: Fifteen QIs were selected by the consensus procedure. Five QIs did not pass feasibility criteria, because of inappropriate documentation, inefficient laboratory services or patient factors. Three QIs provided minor opportunity for improvement. Two QIs contradicted each other; one of these was considered not valid and excluded. A final set of six QIs was defined for use in the Indonesian setting. CONCLUSION: Using the Delphi method, we defined a list of QIs for assessing the quality of care, in particular antibiotic treatment, for CAP in Indonesia. For further improvement, a modified Delphi method that includes discussion, a sound medical documentation system, improvement of microbiology laboratory services, and multi-center applicability tests are needed to develop a valid and applicable QI list for the Indonesian setting.

The effect of scientific evidence on conservation practitioners' management decisions.

A major justification of environmental management research is that it helps practitioners, yet previous studies show it is rarely used to inform their decisions. We tested whether conservation practitioners focusing on bird management were willing to use a synopsis of relevant scientific literature to inform their management decisions. This allowed us to examine whether the limited use of scientific information in management is due to a lack of access to the scientific literature or whether it is because practitioners are either not interested or unable to incorporate the research into their decisions. In on-line surveys, we asked 92 conservation managers, predominantly from Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom, to provide opinions on 28 management techniques that could be applied to reduce predation on birds. We asked their opinions before and after giving them a summary of the literature about the interventions' effectiveness. We scored the overall effectiveness and certainty of evidence for each intervention through an expert elicitation process-the Delphi method. We used the effectiveness scores to assess the practitioners' level of understanding and awareness of the literature. On average, each survey participant changed their likelihood of using 45.7% of the interventions after reading the synopsis of the evidence. They were more likely to implement effective interventions and avoid ineffective actions, suggesting that their intended future management strategies may be more successful than current practice. More experienced practitioners were less likely to change their management practices than those with less experience, even though they were not more aware of the existing scientific information than less experienced practitioners. The practitioners' willingness to change their management choices when provided with summarized scientific evidence suggests that improved accessibility to scientific information would benefit conservation management outcomes.

Guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging in axial spondyloarthritis: A Delphi study.

OBJECTIVE: The term axial spondyloarthritis refers to a group of chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases with a common genetic basis that course with axial and peripheral involvement and enthesitis. Recently, the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) established some diagnostic criteria, including for the first time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. Given the difficulties of obtaining MRI in some environments and the lack of experience with axial spondyloarthritis, a group of radiologists and rheumatologists sought to establish some practical guidelines to ensure the correct use of MRI in this disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using the Delphi method, we used a questionnaire with 49 items stratified into 4 blocks to survey 46 experts in the MRI diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis. RESULTS: The experts agreed on 82% of the items. The degree of agreement was 100% in the block "Importance of early diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis", 69% in the block "Optimization of the use of MRI in the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis", 93% in the block "Use of MRI in axial spondyloarthritis: Technical aspects", and 57% in the block "Usefulness of MRI in the prognosis, follow-up, and evaluation of the response to treatment in axial spondyloarthritis". CONCLUSIONS: Despite the importance of MRI in the early diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis, this study shows the need for standardization and points to relative disagreement about how to use MRI in the follow-up of the disease and evaluation of the response to treatment. The results of this study can help improve the use of MRI in axial spondyloarthritis.

Expert recommendations for the use of apremilast in psoriatic arthritis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Despite the evidence, there are doubts about the positioning of apremilast in the psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treatment algorithm. The objective of this project was to collect the scientific evidence and the experience of a group of rheumatologists who are experts in the management of PsA with apremilast in clinical practice in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A scientific committee made up of 6 experts proposed 5 clinical scenarios where the evidence on the use of apremilast in PsA was controversial: (i) Efficacy in peripheral PsA; (ii) Efficacy in enthesitis and dactylitis; (iii) Efficacy in PsA with skin involvement; (iv) Comorbidities; and (v) Apremilast safety. After this, a panel of 17 rheumatologists with expertise in PsA management discussed these scenarios and generated a questionnaire with 50 questions and 156 items following the Delphi methodology. This questionnaire was anonymously answered by the panel. RESULTS: After 2 voting rounds, the panel of experts reached consensus in 93 of the 156 items raised (59.6%) (67 in agreement and 26 in disagreement). The degree of consensus was 53.3% in the area of "Efficacy in peripheral PsA"; 60.0% in "Efficacy in enthesitis and dactylitis"; 50.0% in "Efficacy in PsA with skin involvement"; 57.1% in "Management of comorbidities in patients with PsA"; and 67.3% in "Implications of safety in the use of apremilast". CONCLUSIONS: The structured opinion of the experts complements the available evidence and contributes to the establishment of consensual guidelines for the use of apremilast in PsA.

Strategies to improve the flow of admissions and hospital stays: a Delphi study of an adaptation of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP).

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: The Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) tool analyzes inappropriate hospital stays and admissions. This study aimed to adapt the AEP questionnaire in order to analyse the appropriateness of hospital admissions and stays in our healthcare reality. METHODS: A study was conducted using the Delphi method in which 15 experts in clinical management and hospital care participated. The initial questionnaire items were taken from the first version of the AEP. In the first round, the participants contributed new items that they considered relevant in our current reality. In rounds 2 and 3, they evaluated 80 items according to their relevance using a Likert scale from 1 to 4 (maximum usefulness). Pursuant to the study's design, AEP items were considered adequate if the mean score according to the experts' evaluation was greater than or equal to 3. RESULTS: The participants defined a total of 19 new items. In the end, 47 items earned a mean score greater than or equal to 3. The resulting modified questionnaire include 17 items in "Reasons for Appropriate Admissions," 5 in "Reasons for Inappropriate Admissions," 15 in "Reasons for Appropriate Hospital Stays," and 10 in "Reasons for Inappropriate Hospital Stays." CONCLUSIONS: The identification according to expert opinion of priority items to determine the appropriateness of admissions and extended stays could be used in the future to help create an instrument to be used in our setting.

[Translated article] Checklist for the pharmaceutical care of patients with interstitial lung disease (CheckEPID): A Delphi-based consensus.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a checklist to facilitate pharmaceutical care for patients with interstitial lung disease who require or are undergoing treatment with antifibrotic drugs. METHOD: Five hospital pharmacists developed an initial list of 37 items divided into 4 blocks: (1) First visit, which included general patient data and data from the first treatment; (2) follow-up visits, assessing aspects of the follow-up of the treatment with nintedanib or pirfenidone; (3) telepharmacy, consisting of the evaluation of the inclusion of patients in a program of this type, course of the disease, and identification of the contact with the pharmacy service; (4) non-pharmacological treatment and patient information. To decide its potential inclusion in the checklist, 2 rounds of the Delphi were carried out in which the panelists had to assess the degree of agreement of each proposed item according to its "utility", which was the determining criterion for its inclusion, and its "applicability". RESULTS: Forty-eight hospital pharmacists were contacted, 30 (63%) agreed in writing to participate, 28 (58%) completed the first round of the Delphi, and 27 (56%) completed the second round. After the first round of the Delphi, the questionnaire was amended and comprised 40 items. Of the 40 items evaluated after the 2 rounds of the Delphi, there were 2 that, based on utility, the participants did not reach consensus for inclusion in the checklist: the one referring to "History of surgical intervention, specifically abdominal surgery in the last 4 weeks" (finally kept on the checklist due to its involvement in the indication of nintedanib) and to make recommendations on "Relaxation". No consensus was reached on their applicability for 2 of the items: "Patient stratification according to the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH) chronic patient model" and "Collection of Results Reported by the Patient". CONCLUSIONS: The management of patients with ILD and/or pulmonary fibrosis is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach where the hospital pharmacist plays a key role, especially, although not only, in monitoring drug treatment. We believe that this checklist can contribute from pharmaceutical care to improving the integrated care of patients with ILD who require or are undergoing treatment with antifibrotic drugs.

Checklist for Pharmaceutical Care of the Patient with interstitial lung disease (CheckEPID): A Delphi-based consensus. / Lista de comprobación para la atención farmacéutica del paciente con enfermedad pulmonar intersticial (CheckEPID): un consenso basado en el método Delphi.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a checklist to facilitate pharmaceutical care for patients with interstitial lung disease who require or are undergoing treatment with antifibrotic drugs. METHOD: Five hospital pharmacists developed an initial list of 37 items divided into 4 blocks: 1) First visit, which included general patient data and data from the first treatment; 2) Follow-up visits, assessing aspects of the follow-up of the treatment with nintedanib or pirfenidone; 3) Telepharmacy, consisting of the evaluation of the inclusion of patients in a program of this type, course of the disease, and identification of the contact with the pharmacy service; 4) Non-pharmacological treatment and patient information. To decide its potential inclusion in the checklist, two rounds of the Delphi were carried out in which the panelists had to assess the degree of agreement of each proposed item according to its "utility", which was the determining criterion for its inclusion, and its "applicability". RESULTS: 48 hospital pharmacists were contacted, 30 (63%) agreed in writing to participate, 28 (58%) completed the first round of the Delphi, and 27 (56%) completed the second round. After the first round of the Delphi the questionnaire was amended and comprised 40 items. Of the 40 items evaluated after the two rounds of the Delphi, there were two that, based on utility, the participants did not reach consensus for inclusion in the checklist: The one referring to "History of surgical intervention, specifically abdominal surgery in the last 4 weeks" (finally kept on the checklist due to its involvement in the indication of nintedanib) and to make recommendations on "Relaxation". No consensus was reached on their applicability for two of the items: "Patient stratification according to the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH) chronic patient model" and "Collection of Results Reported by the Patient". CONCLUSIONS: The management of patients with ILD and/or pulmonary fibrosis is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach where the hospital pharmacist plays a key role, especially, although not only, in monitoring drug treatment. We believe that this checklist can contribute from pharmaceutical care to improving the integrated care of patients with ILD who require or are undergoing treatment with antifibrotic drugs.

Description of basic competencies in clinical ultrasound imaging for emergency departments. / Competencias básicas de la ecografía clínica en los servicios de urgencias y emergencias.

TEXT: Recent years have seen great advances in the use of clinical ultrasound imaging in both hospital emergency departments and out-of-hospital settings. However, all new techniques require up-to-date definitions of competencies relevant to the clinical realities of different specialties and the geographic settings in which specialists work. To that end, a group of experts in clinical ultrasound reviewed the evidence available in the literature and strictly applied the Delphi method to define the competencies relevant to emergency physicians. The group worked with the starting premise that clinical ultrasound imaging should be a common competency across the specialty.

TEXTO: En los últimos años, la ecografía clínica (EC) ha sufrido un avance muy importante en su implantación dentro de los servicios de urgencias, tanto hospitalarios como extrahospitalarios, pero como toda técnica requiere un ámbito competencial definido, actualizado y enmarcado, tanto en la realidad clínica de la especialidad que desempeñamos como en la geográfica del país donde ejercemos. Por ello, un grupo de expertos en la materia ha desarrollado el presente documento en el que basándose por un lado en la evidencia disponible en la bibliografía científica y por otro en una metodología Delphi, planteó el objetivo de establecer un claro marco competencial base para todos los urgenciólogos, asumiendo como premisa inicial que la EC debería ser una competencia transversal común.

[INCLIASMA project - Clinical inertia in asthma]. / Proyecto INCLIASMA - inercia clínica en asma.

OBJECTIVES: Asthma is a highly prevalent disease limiting the quality of life of patients and has high health costs. Despite having clinical practice guidelines, poor asthma control continues to be detected. The objective of this project is to study asthma management from primary care consultations in Aragón, Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Qualitative, multicenter and non-randomized study, developed in two-round, following Delphi methodology. A group of a group of Primary Care physicians with extensive experience in asthma management were asked to express their level of agreement with the set of items of the questionnaire proposed by the scientific committee of the project. The 28-item survey was structured in 4 blocks: diagnosis, control, adherence and treatment. RESULTS: The survey was answered by 15 experts. Consensus was reached in 82.14% (23/28) of the items. Difficulties were found in diagnosing asthma early and accurately. There is a confusion between control and severity. The perception of adherence is highly variable. There is an overuse of short-acting bronchodilators. Much therapeutic inertia is evidenced. CONCLUSIONS: The INCLIASMA study highlights the existing controversies between what is advised in the guidelines of clinical practice and the real evidence and provides recommendations to correct the differences found.

[INCLIASMA phase II project - Clinical inertia in asthma in Spain]. / Proyecto INCLIASMA fase II - Inercia clínica en asma en España.

OBJECTIVES: Eighty percent of patients with asthma are poorly controlled. Despite the availability of updated clinical practice guidelines, poor asthma control and treatment continue to be detected. The main objective of the INCLIASMA phaseII study (INercia CLInica en ASMA) is to analyze the reality of asthma management in Spanish primary care (PC) clinics. As a secondary objective, it was proposed to establish a series of key recommendations in the management of patients with asthma, based on the conclusions of the panelists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional descriptive, multicenter and non-randomized study, which was developed in two rounds, following the Delphi methodology. A specific online questionnaire was developed for the project with 41 items and divided into 5 blocks (diagnosis, control, adherence, treatment and referral criteria) and a group of PC physicians who were experts in asthma were asked to express their level of agreement or disagreement with the set of items in the questionnaire. From the results, the main existing controversies in the management of asthma in Spain were identified and practical recommendations were elaborated. RESULTS: Twenty-four panelists participated. There was a final consensus in 92.68% (38/41) of all the items collected in the questionnaire. The panelists concluded that it takes too long to diagnose asthma, and there is a high percentage of asthmatic patients without proper treatment, and therefore, without adequate control. Lack of time, care overload or therapeutic inertia are some of the determining factors in this situation. CONCLUSIONS: The INCLIASMA phaseII study highlights the controversies found in routine clinical practice in asthma management, highlighting the continued need for training and offering consensus recommendations that seek to improve asthma management in our country.

[Recommendations to develop Care Models for patients with Heart Failure (MAIC Project) from macromanagement]. / Recomendaciones para desarrollar Modelos Asistenciales de atención al paciente con Insuficiencia Cardiaca (Proyecto MAIC): Estudio Delphi.

BACKGROUND: The general objective of the study was to reflect on the key factors to advance in optimal models of care for Heart Failure (HF) and specifically, on the macromanagement elements most necessary for the development of comprehensive HF management models. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An Advisory Committee, composed of 15 experts and a multidisciplinary group of 31 additional experts, was appointed, together forming a Delphi panel of 46 experts. Based on a systematic bibliographic review and the analysis of the care course of the patient with HF, an initial battery of key factors for the development of HF care models was identified by the Advisory Committee. This proposal was adjusted and prioritized by the Delphi panel applying Delphi Rand/UCLA methodology. RESULTS: After two Delphi rounds, 75 key factors grouped into 7 challenges were defined. In the first of the challenges, related to the development of HF management models, 16 key factors were identified, 7 of which were valued as high priority and related to the establishment of common objectives, resources for the continuity of care and improving the measurement of health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The definition of management elements at the macro level was considered a priority to advance in the development of optimal models of assistance to HF.

Usefulness of endonasal flaps and grafts in skull base surgery. Consensus document.

INTRODUCTION: Skull base reconstruction is one of the greatest challenges extended endonasal endoscopic surgery. Many grafts and flaps from the endonasal fossa have been demonstrated to be useful in the control of complications such a cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Review and analysis of these resources are necessary in skull base recontruction to improve outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The target is to create a consensus document on the use of different endonasal flaps and grafts in the skull base surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Literature review of the most relevant free grafts and vascularized flaps from the endonasal fossa. Analysis using the Delphi method on the use of the different endonasal resources for endoscopic repair of skull base defects. RESULTS: We obtained two results: 1) A selection of the most representative flaps and grafts from the endonasal fossa, describing origin, surface and indications, based on a literature review. 2) A consensus document, using Delphi methodology, with general considerations (2), recommendations (10) and limitations (6) of the different endonasal flaps and grafts. CONCLUSIONS: We present the first consensus document in the field of extended endonasal endoscopic surgery using the Delphi method as a working tool. We highlight the usefulness of the nasoseptal flap together with other endonasal flaps and grafts for skull base reconstruction.

[Protocol for the histologic diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma: consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) for the National Cutaneous Melanoma Registry]. / Protocolo de diagnóstico histológico para muestras de pacientes con melanoma cutáneo. Documento de consenso de la SEAP y la AEDV para el Registro Nacional de Melanoma.

This article describes a proposed protocol for the histologic diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma developed for the National Cutaneous Melanoma Registry managed by the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV). Following a review of the literature, 36 variables relating to primary tumors, sentinel lymph nodes, and lymph node dissection were evaluated using the modified Delphi method by a panel of 8 specialists (including 7 pathologists). Consensus was reached on the 30 variables that should be included in all pathology reports for cutaneous melanoma and submitted to the Melanoma Registry. This list can also serve as a model to guide routine reporting in pathology departments.

Protocol for the Histologic Diagnosis of Cutaneous Melanoma: Consensus Statement of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) for the National Cutaneous Melanoma Registry. / Protocolo de diagnóstico histológico para muestras de pacientes con melanoma cutáneo. Documento de consenso de la SEAP y la AEDV para el Registro Nacional de Melanoma.

This article describes a proposed protocol for the histologic diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma developed for the National Cutaneous Melanoma Registry managed by the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV). Following a review of the literature, 36 variables relating to primary tumors, sentinel lymph nodes, and lymph node dissection were evaluated using the modified Delphi method by a panel of 8 specialists (including 7 pathologists). Consensus was reached on the 30 variables that should be included in all pathology reports for cutaneous melanoma and submitted to the Melanoma Registry. This list can also serve as a model to guide routine reporting in pathology departments.

Management of Psoriasis During Preconception, Pregnancy, Postpartum, and Breastfeeding: A Consensus Statement. / Consenso sobre las actuaciones a seguir durante la edad fértil, el embarazo, el posparto y la lactancia en pacientes con psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence- and experience-based recommendations for the management of psoriasis during preconception, pregnancy, postpartum, and breastfeeding. METHODS: The nominal group technique and the Delphi method were used. Fifteen experts (12 dermatologists, 2 of whom were appointed coordinators; 1 rheumatologist; and 2 gynecologists) were selected to form an expert panel. Following a systematic review of the literature on fertility, pregnancy, postpartum, and breastfeeding in women with psoriasis, the coordinators drew up a series of preliminary recommendations for discussion by the panel at a nominal group meeting. The experts defined the scope, sections, and intended users of the statement and prepared a final list of recommendations. Consensus was obtained using a Delphi process in which an additional 51 dermatologists rated their level of agreement with each recommendation on a scale of 1 (total disagreement) to 10 (total agreement). Consensus was defined by a score of 7 or higher assigned by at least 70% of participants. Level of evidence and strength of recommendation were reported using the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine categories. The final statement was approved by the expert panel. RESULTS: The resulting consensus statement includes 23 recommendations on preconception (fertility and contraception), pregnancy (planning, pharmacological management, and follow-up), and breastfeeding (management and follow-up). Consensus was achieved for all recommendations generated except one. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations for the better management of psoriasis in women of childbearing age could improve outcomes and prognosis.

Remission in axial spondyloarthritis: Developing a consensus definition.

OBJECTIVE: To reach a consensus on the tools available to evaluate disease activity in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), and to develop a consensus definition of remission in axSpA. METHODS: A modified Delphi method was used. A scientific committee proposed statements addressing the assessment of axSpA in clinical practice and the definition of remission. The questionnaire was evaluated in 2 rounds by rheumatologists from GRESSER (GRupo de Estudio de ESpondiloartritis de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología). RESULTS: After 2 rounds of evaluation, a panel of 81 rheumatologists reached agreement on 56 out of the 80 proposed items (72.0%). There was agreement that the definition of remission in axSpA should include: disease activity, pain, fatigue, peripheral involvement, extra-articular manifestations, laboratory tests, functional impairment, mobility, quality of life, need for treatment, radiographic progression, and patient and physician global assessments. It is recommended to set a therapeutic goal when starting a treatment. The ideal goal is remission although low disease activity may also be an acceptable alternative. The Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) is the preferred tool to assess disease activity. The panel made a proposal for clinical remission in axSpA based on the ASDAS cut-off value for inactive disease, the absence of extra-articular (acute anterior uveitis, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease) and peripheral (arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis) manifestations, plus normal C-reactive protein levels and absence of radiographic progression. CONCLUSION: This work offers consensus recommendations and a proposal of clinical remission that may be useful in the management of patients with axSpA.

Usefulness of endonasal flaps and grafts in skull base surgery. Consensus document. / Utilidad de los colgajos e injertos endonasales en cirugía endoscópica nasosinusal y de base de cráneo. Documento de consenso.

INTRODUCTION: Skull base reconstruction is one of the greatest challenges extended endonasal endoscopic surgery. Many grafts and flaps from the endonasal fossa have been demonstrated to be useful in the control of complications such a cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Review and analysis of these resources are necessary in skull base recontruction to improve outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The target is to create a consensus document on the use of different endonasal flaps and grafts in the skull base surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Literature review of the most relevant free grafts and vascularized flaps from the endonasal fossa. Analysis using the Delphi method on the use of the different endonasal resources for endoscopic repair of skull base defects. RESULTS: We obtained two results: 1) A selection of the most representative flaps and grafts from the endonasal fossa, describing origin, surface and indications, based on a literature review. 2) A consensus document, using Delphi methodology, with general considerations (2), recommendations (10) and limitations (6) of the different endonasal flaps and grafts. CONCLUSIONS: We present the first consensus document in the field of extended endonasal endoscopic surgery using the Delphi method as a working tool. We highlight the usefulness of the nasoseptal flap together with other endonasal flaps and grafts for skull base reconstruction.

[Delphi method to reach consensus on education methods to promote healthy eating behaviors in adolescents]. / Método Delphi para consensuar metodologías educativas para promover la alimentación saludable en adolescentes.

INTRODUCTION: Background: adolescence is a relevant period to educate in healthy eating behaviors. For this purpose it is necessary to obtain expert opinions and reach consensus and prioritize the best methodologies available to educate adolescents on healthy eating. Methods: the Delphi method was chosen to get consensus through repeated iterations of anonymous opinions in two rounds. Participants were experts in nutrition (24), education (14), and cooking (2), selected with the following inclusion criteria: outstanding professional career; interest shown in their knowledge area, and expertise in healthy eating education. The 40 experts in the first round were reduced to 37 in the second round. The questionnaire was mailed in the first round and the results were sent to establish priorities in the second round. The analysis was done with descriptive statistics (%). Consensus was reached if ≥ 75th percentile. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to analyze internal consistency, which was considered good for an alpha value higher than 0.7, and moderate for values between 0.6 and 0.7. Results: there was 90% consensus for food habits, culinary skills, and methodologies. In food habits experts prioritized improving access to healthy food and curricular changes at school. In culinary skills they agreed on healthy breakfast and healthy snack preparations; in methodologies the consensus was to educate in healthy eating at breakfast and lunch at school, and on participative activities such as cooking workshops. Conclusions: the Delphi method was useful to obtain consensus and priorities on the methodologies to educate adolescents in healthy eating.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Antecedentes: la adolescencia es un período importante para reforzar la educación sobre alimentación saludable. Para ello se requiere consensuar y establecer prioridades con expertos sobre las mejores metodologías para educar a los adolescentes en alimentación saludable. Métodos: se escogió el método Delphi para obtener consenso a través de opiniones anónimas repetidas en dos rondas. Se seleccionaron expertos en nutrición (24), educación (14) y cocina (2) con los siguientes criterios de inclusión: carrera profesional relevante; mostrar interés en su área de conocimiento y experiencia en educación en alimentación saludable. Los 40 expertos de la primera ronda disminuyeron a 37 en la segunda ronda. El cuestionario enviado por correo en la primera ronda y sus resultados fueron reenviados para establecer prioridades. El análisis se efectuó con estadísticas descriptivas (%). Se consideró consenso el valor ≥ percentil 75. La consistencia interna se analizó con el coeficiente alfa de Cronbach (se considera buena si alfa es mayor de 0,7 y moderada si se sitúa entre 0,6 y 0,7). Resultados: hubo más de un 90 % de consenso en las metodologías para hábitos alimentarios, habilidades culinarias y estrategias metodológicas. En los hábitos alimentarios se consideró como prioritario mejorar el acceso a la comida saludable y cambiar los currículos en la escuela. En las habilidades culinarias, la preparación de un desayuno saludable y colaciones saludables, y en las estrategias metodológicas, educar en hábitos alimentarios durante el desayuno y el almuerzo, y desarrollar actividades participativas tales como talleres de cocina. Conclusiones: el método Delphi fue útil para obtener el consenso y las prioridades en cuanto a las metodologías para educar a los adolescentes en alimentación saludable.