Secondary Patellar Resurfacing Following Primary Unresurfaced Total Knee Arthroplasty: Beware of the Incidence of Late Patellar Erosion.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR) indications and rates in a single-surgeon series utilizing a modern TKA design and additionally, to review the functional outcomes of patients after undergoing SPR. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected institutional database was performed. All patients undergoing primary TKA by a single surgeon between 2013 and 2021 were included. During this time, the senior surgeon resurfaced the patella selectively. Patients were divided into the primary resurfaced (PR) and the primary unresurfaced (UR). All patients undergoing SPR in the UR group were identified, their radiographs reviewed, and their clinical outcomes assessed. During the study period, 1,511 TKAs were performed, with 73.1% (1,105 TKAs) being unresurfaced. RESULTS: The all-cause revision rate was 1.2% in the PR group and 3.6% in the UR group. The rate of SPR in the UR group was 2.0% (22 of 1,105 TKAs). No patient in the PR group underwent revision surgery for a patellar complication. The mean age at primary TKA for those undergoing SPR was 65 years (range, 50 to 78). The average time for SPR from primary TKA was 3.4 years (range, 1.1 to 8.8). Postoperative radiographic progression of patellar erosion, in combination with new onset anterior knee pain, was the indication for SPR in 14 of the 22 (63.7%) SPR cases. After SPR, the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index score (P < .001) and Knee Society Score (P < .001) improved from pre-SPR. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR) was the most common (55%) reason for revision surgery after primary UR TKA in this series. An SPR improved clinical outcomes in symptomatic patients. Surgeons should consider patellar resurfacing for all patients undergoing primary TKA to reduce the burden of revision surgery post-TKA. Additionally, the paradigm that late SPR does not improve clinical outcomes needs to be revisited.

The Statistical Fragility of Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

INTRODUCTION: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have conflicting findings, with some reporting its efficacy and others demonstrating no clinical significance. The fragility index (FI), reverse fragility index (rFI), and fragility quotient (FQ) evaluated statistical fragility of outcomes in RCTs evaluating patellar resurfacing in TKA. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases were systematically searched for RCTs (January 1, 2000, to August 1, 2023) assessing patellar resurfacing in TKA. Of 226 RCTs screened, 19 studies were included for analysis. We calculated FI and rFI, which represent the number of outcome event reversals required to alter statistical significance for significant and non-significant outcomes, respectively. The outcome categories of interest included anterior knee pain, complications/ adverse events, crepitus, reoperation, patient satisfaction, and clinical improvement. The FQ was determined by dividing the FI by the study sample size. RESULTS: Across 46 outcomes, the median FI was 5 (Interquartile Range (IQR) 3 to 8) with a median FQ of 0.041 (IQR 0.025 to 0.063). There were nine outcomes that were statistically significant, with a median FI of 3 (IQR 2 to 8) and a FQ of 0.011 (IQR 0.0044 to 0.039). There were 37 outcomes that were non-significant, with a median rFI of 5 (IQR 4 to 7) and FQ of 0.043 (IQR 0.031 to 0.062). Notably, in 47.8% of all outcomes, the number of patients lost-to-follow-up was greater than the outcome's respective FI or rFI. Outcomes regarding patient satisfaction (FI 4.5) and anterior knee pain (FI 5) were most fragile. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of interest regarding patellar resurfacing from RCTs are statistically fragile, particularly significant outcomes and patient satisfaction outcomes. Data surrounding patellar resurfacing remains inconclusive, and combining P-values with FI/FQ metrics may aid in interpreting patellar resurfacing findings. Future studies may mitigate fragility by obtaining higher follow-up rates and sample sizes.

The Fate of Unresurfaced Patellae in Contemporary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Early to Midterm Results.

BACKGROUND: Leaving the patella unresurfaced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has increased significantly over the past decade in the United States, likely due to modern patella-friendly implants, complications with resurfacing, and the knowledge that historical studies were scientifically confounded. This study evaluated revision-free survivorship out to 8.5 years in a cohort of contemporary primary TKAs with patella-friendly femoral components and unresurfaced patellae. METHODS: A total of 1,053 consecutive primary TKAs with unresurfaced patellae were retrospectively reviewed. A selective patellar nonresurfacing protocol was used for all cases. Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimates were calculated based on patellar revision and the latest follow-up. An aggressive lateral patellar facetectomy was performed in 78% (823 of 1,053) of cases. The cohort was 62% women and 43% American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification I or II with a mean age and body mass index of 65 years (range, 35 to 94) and 35 kg/m2 (range, 18 to 65), respectively. RESULTS: A total of 4 (0.4%, 4 of 1,053) unresurfaced patellae were revised. Three were resurfaced as part of other procedures: 2 for global instability and one for aseptic loosening at a mean of 1.6 years; and one patella was resurfaced by an outside surgeon for unexplained pain. The all-cause revision-free survivorship estimate specifically related to the patella was 98.9% (95% confidence interval, 98 to 100) out to 8.5 years. No significant difference in survivorship was related to patellae with or without a lateral patellar facetectomy (99.5 versus 98.1%, P ≥ .191); however, 3 of 4 patellar revisions occurred in TKAs without a lateral patellar facetectomy (P = .035). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate excellent revision-free survivorship related to unresurfaced patellae, particularly when a lateral facetectomy was performed. These early to midterm results using modern patella-friendly femoral components are promising and comparable to resurfaced patellae in the literature. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Global Trends in Patellar Resurfacing From 2004 to 2022.

BACKGROUND: International rates of patellar resurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are highly variable. This study sought to determine how trends in patellar resurfacing rates have changed between 2004 and 2022. In addition, we investigated how modern rates of revision have varied between resurfaced and unresurfaced patellae in primary TKA among national joint registries. METHODS: Data between 2004 and 2022 was obtained either from the publicly available joint registry annual reports, a literature review, or via direct correspondence with registry personnel in Sweden, New Zealand, Australia, the United States, Norway, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Canada, and India. Only English language national joint registries or data via direct correspondence with registry administrators were utilized. Additionally, the 10-year cumulative risk of revision TKA with and without patellar resurfacing was pulled from those registries that had this data available. RESULTS: There were persistent differences in the rates of patellar resurfacing among countries. Australia documented a 40% increase in patellar resurfacing rates, while other countries demonstrated modest or little change in resurfacing rates. This may indicate that surgeons are making the decision to resurface based on national TKA revision rates. The average rates of patellar resurfacing in primary TKA ranged from 4% in Sweden to 94% in the United States. Canada, the United States, Australia, and Switzerland documented a lower risk of revision when the patella was resurfaced, while Sweden, conversely, showed a higher risk of revision with resurfacing. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of patellar resurfacing in primary TKA were highly variable among countries, as were rates of change over time. It appears that the optimal patellar resurfacing strategy may depend mostly on unique patient factors and surgeon expertise. Future studies should attempt to elucidate the individual patient characteristics that contribute to increased risks of revision or anterior knee pain to determine who will most benefit from patellar resurfacing in primary TKA.

Systematic lateral retinacular release does not reduce anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty with patellar resurfacing.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of systematic lateral retinacular release (LRR) on anterior knee pain (AKP), as well as its impact on the functional and radiological outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with patellar resurfacing. METHODS: A prospective randomized study was designed. It included patients scheduled for a TKA procedure with patellar resurfacing, who were recruited and randomized into either the LRR group or the non-release group. 198 patients were included in the final analysis. The pressure pain threshold (PPT) assessed by pressure algometry (PA), the visual analogue scale (VAS), Feller's patellar score, the Knee Society Score (KSS), patellar height, and patellar tilt were recorded both preoperatively and at the 1-year follow-up. The Mann-Whitney U test was performed to determine comparisons between both groups as well as to determine differences' intragroup. RESULTS: Relative to the clinical variables and scores, no difference was detected between the two groups at the 1-year follow-up (p = n.s.). However, there was a slight difference in patellar tilt (0.1º vs. 1.4º, p = 0.044), with higher tilt values in the non-release group. There was no difference in terms of improvement in the clinical and radiological scores and variables recorded between the two groups (p = n.s.). CONCLUSION: LRR in primary TKA with patellar resurfacing does not show an improvement in AKP and functional outcomes over patellar resurfacing without release. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Selective Patella Resurfacing in Contemporary Cruciate Retaining and Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Leaving the patella unresurfaced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing due to modern patella-friendly implants, awareness that complications are not uncommon with resurfacing, and knowledge that historical studies were scientifically confounded. This study examined the effect of selective patellar resurfacing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) using modern implants and techniques in cohorts rigorously matched for demographics and osteoarthritis severity. METHODS: A total of 166 TKAs performed without patellar resurfacing were case-control matched to 166 TKAs with patella resurfacing. Case-control matching was based on demographics, American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status, comorbidities, and osteoarthritis severity. No significant differences were observed between cohorts for demographics (P ≥ .347), comorbidities (P ≥ .443), or radiographic osteoarthritis severity (P ≥ .078). Radiographic alignment and prospectively collected PROMs were evaluated preoperatively and at latest clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Preoperatively, patellar tilt was less for the unresurfaced patella group (3 versus 4°, P = .003); however, postoperative patellar tilt was not different (3 versus 3°, P = .225). At a mean of 2.1 years follow-up (range, 1 to 7), University of California Los Angeles Activity Level was significantly higher for the unresurfaced patella group (6.3 versus 5.5, P = .002), but the mean group difference did not reach a minimal clinically important difference. There were no other significant differences in PROMs or reoperation rates between cohorts (P ≥ .135). CONCLUSION: In contemporary cruciate retaining and substituting TKA designs, not resurfacing the patella in select patients may achieve comparable PROMs and re-operation rates; and potentially greater activity level compared to patella resurfacing at early follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Significantly Worse Fixation of Cemented Patellar Components on Multiacquisition Variable-Resonance Image Combination Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared to Femoral and Tibial Components: A Cause for Concern?

BACKGROUND: The etiology of anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unclear. Few studies have examined patellar fixation quality. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the patellar cement-bone interface after TKA on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to correlate the patella fixation grade with the incidence of anterior knee pain. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 279 knees undergoing metal artifact reduction MRI for either anterior or generalized knee pain at least 6 months after cemented, posterior-stabilized TKA with patellar resurfacing with one implant manufacturer. MRI cement-bone interfaces and percent-integration of the patella, femur, and tibia were assessed by a fellowship-trained senior musculoskeletal radiologist. The grade and character of the patella interface were compared to the femur and tibia. Regression analyses were used to determine the association between patella integration with anterior knee pain. RESULTS: There were more patellar components with ≥75% zones of fibrous tissue (50%) compared to the femur (18%) or tibia (5%) (P < .001). There were a greater number of patellar implants with poor cement integration (18%) compared to the femur (1%) or tibia (1%) (P < .001). MRI findings showed more evidence of patellar component loosening (8%) compared to the femur (1%) or tibia (1%) (P < .001). Anterior knee pain was correlated with worse patella cement integration (P = .01), with women predicted to have better integration (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The quality of the patellar cement-bone interface after TKA is worse compared to the femoral or tibial component interface. Poor patellar cement-bone interface may be a source of anterior knee pain after TKA, but further investigation is required.

Higher failure rate of secondary patellar resurfacing following bicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: The role of secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR) in anterior knee pain (AKP) is still debated in literature. A regional arthroplasty registry was investigated, aiming to: (1) assess the survival rate of SPR; and (2) compare SPR to tricompartmental TKA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The regional arthroplasty registry RIPO was investigated about all SPRs performed after bicompartmental arthroplasty. The survival rates and the reasons for revision were assessed as any other factor that could have influenced implants failure. SPR survivorship was compared to tricompartmental TKAs. RESULTS: 406 SPRs performed after bicompartmental arthroplasty were analyzed. The survival rates were 80.6% (CI 95% 75.9-84.5) at 5 years and 77.6% (CI 95% 72.4-82) at 7 years. Half of the SPRs was performed 0.9-2.4 years after the index bicompartmental arthroplasty. SPR achieved lower survival than tricompartmental TKA (80.6% vs 96.7%, p < 0.001), with an adjusted hazard ratio for failure of 5.5 (CI 95% 4.2-7.1, p < 0.001). SPRs performed within 2 years after primary implant had a significantly higher rates of failure when compared to tricompartmental TKA (HR: 6.4, CI 95% 4.8-8.4, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: SPR after bicompartmental knee arthroplasty showed modest 5- and 7-year survival rates, worse than primary tricompartmental TKA. When SPRs are performed within 2 years after primary arthroplasty, a significant higher risk of failure should be expected, highlighting than appropriate pre-operative work-up and patient selection is crucial for SPR successful outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, therapeutic study.

Do we need to restore patellar thickness after total knee arthroplasty with patellar resurfacing?

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether increased patellar thickness after resurfacing decreased knee flexion angle and had any effect on functional outcomes comparing with patellar thickness restoration (patelloplasty) in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or not. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 220 patients undergoing primary TKA: 110 patients undergoing patelloplasty and 110 patients received overstuffed patellar resurfacing using subchondral bone cut at lateral facet technique were recruited. The mean increase in patellar thickness after resurfacing equal to 2 ± 1.2 mm. The outcomes were postoperative knee flexion angle and modified Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score at minimum 2 year after surgery. RESULTS: The mean postoperative knee flexion angles were similar between overstuffed resurfacing group and patelloplasty group (132 ± 7° vs. 134 ± 8°, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 6.9-1.8°, p = 0.1). The mean increase in postoperative knee flexion was 13° in both groups (p = 0.94). The mean change of overall modified WOMAC score was also similar between the two groups (42 ± 12 vs. 39 ± 9 points, 95% CI - 1.7-9.4 points, p = 0.17). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that increased patellar thickness has no effect on postoperative knee flexion angle and functional outcomes in TKA. The finding clarified the misunderstanding principle of native patellar thickness restoration after resurfacing which had made many surgeons to refrain from resurfacing especially in patient who had thin patella.

Clinical effectiveness of patellar resurfacing, no resurfacing and selective resurfacing in primary total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional and observational evidence.

BACKGROUND: Patellar resurfacing is optional during total knee replacement (TKR). Some surgeons always resurface the patella, some never resurface, and others selectively resurface. Which resurfacing strategy provides optimal outcomes is unclear. We assessed the effectiveness of patellar resurfacing, no resurfacing, and selective resurfacing in primary TKR. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, and bibliographies were searched to November 2021 for randomised-control trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes for two or more resurfacing strategies (resurfacing, no resurfacing, or selective resurfacing) in primary TKR. Observational studies were included if limited or no RCTs existed for resurfacing comparisons. Outcomes assessed were patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), complications, and further surgery. Study-specific relative risks [RR] were aggregated using random-effects models. Quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. RESULTS: We identified 33 RCTs involving 5,540 TKRs (2,727 = resurfacing, 2,772 = no resurfacing, 41 = selective resurfacing). One trial reported on selective resurfacing. Patellar resurfacing reduced anterior knee pain compared with no resurfacing (RR = 0.65 (95% CI = 0.44-0.96)); there were no significant differences in PROMs. Resurfacing reduced the risk of revision surgery (RR = 0.63, CI = 0.42-0.94) and other complications (RR = 0.54, CI = 0.39-0.74) compared with no resurfacing. Quality of evidence ranged from high to very low. Limited observational evidence (5 studies, TKRs = 215,419) suggested selective resurfacing increased the revision risk (RR = 1.14, CI = 1.05-1.22) compared with resurfacing. Compared with no resurfacing, selective resurfacing had a higher risk of pain (RR = 1.25, CI = 1.04-1.50) and lower risk of revision (RR = 0.92, CI = 0.85-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Level 1 evidence supports TKR with patellar resurfacing over no resurfacing. Resurfacing has a reduced risk of anterior knee pain, revision surgery, and complications, despite PROMs being comparable. High-quality RCTs involving selective resurfacing, the most common strategy in the UK and other countries, are needed given the limited observational data suggests selective resurfacing may not be effective over other strategies.

No difference between resurfaced and non-resurfaced patellae with a modern prosthesis design: a prospective randomized study of 250 total knee arthroplasties.

PURPOSE: Despite numerous well-conducted studies and meta-analyses, the management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between patients with and without patellar resurfacing and to determine the influence of resurfacing on patellar tracking with a "patella-friendly" prosthesis. METHODS: A single-centered prospective randomized controlled study was performed between April 2017 and November 2018. Two hundred and forty-five consecutive patients (250 knees) scheduled for TKA were randomized for patellar resurfacing or patella non-resurfacing. All patients received the same total knee prosthesis and were evaluated clinically and radiologically, including the International Knee Society Score (KSS knee and function), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), anterior knee pain (AKP), pain when climbing stairs, patellar tilt, and patellar translation. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-nine knees were available for clinical evaluation and 221 knees for radiographic analysis. The revision rate for patellofemoral cause was 3.1% (7 cases) with no difference between the groups (p = 0.217). There was no difference in survival rate between patellar resurfacing (88.3%) and non-resurfacing (85.3%) after 24 months (p = 0.599). There were no differences in KSS functional component (p = 0.599), KSS knee component (p = 0.396), FJS (p = 0.798), and AKP (p = 0.688) at a mean follow-up of 18 months. There was twice as much stair pain for the non-resurfacing group (17.1% versus 8.5%) (p = 0.043). There was patellar tilt in 43% of resurfaced knees (n = 50/116) versus 29% in non-resurfaced knees (n = 30/105) (p = 0.025); however, there was more patellar translation in the non-resurfaced group (21.0% versus 7.8%) (p < 0.001). There were no specific complications attributed to the patellar resurfacing procedure. There were four secondary patellar resurfacing procedures (3.6%) in the non-resurfaced group after a mean of 10 ± 7 months (1-17) postoperatively. CONCLUSION: There is no superiority of patellar resurfacing or non-resurfacing in terms of clinical or radiological outcomes at mid-term. Secondary patellar resurfacing is rare. There is not enough evidence to recommend systematic patellar resurfacing with a "patella-friendly" prosthesis.

Patellar component size effects patellar tilt in total knee arthroplasty with patellar resurfacing.

PURPOSE: Patellar component positioning and patellofemoral kinematics are of great importance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The factors influencing patellar tilt are femoral rotation and lateral patellar release. However, the effect of patellar component size remains unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intra-operative risk factors for patellar tilt, particularly the effect of the patellar component size. The hypothesis was that increasing the patellar component size would reduce the risk of patellar tilt. METHODS: 878 primary TKAs with patellar resurfacing were included between January 2015 and October 2018. Analysis was performed at 1-year postoperatively on patients categorized into two groups: patellar tilt (PT) and no patellar tilt (NPT). A multivariate analysis was performed for the effect of patellar component size, femoral rotation, femoral overbuilding, patellar thickness and lateral release on patellar tilt risk. Secondary analysis was performed for any difference in clinical outcomes and revision rates between groups. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that increasing the patellar component size decreased the risk of patellar tilt by 37% (p < 0.001). Placing the femoral component at 3° of external rotation decreased the risk of patellar tilt by 67% (p < 0.001). Secondary analysis showed better clinical outcomes in the NPT group, especially regarding global satisfaction, and KSS objective and subjective scores. The revision for any cause was less in the NPT group (p = 0.019). The cause for TKA revision was related to the patellar in 11% of cases in the NPT group and 65% in the PT group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Increased patellar component size and positioning the femoral component in external rotation decreases the risk of patellar tilt, improves clinical outcomes and decreases the rate of surgical revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Onlay Patellar Resurfacing in a Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Increases Patellar Crepitus Complication: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patellar crepitus (PC) is a potentially problematic complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) more commonly occurring with a posterior-stabilized (PS) prosthesis. Patellar resurfacing has been reported to reduce PC complications; however, no study has compared the PC complication rates between 2 different resurfacing techniques, namely inlay and onlay. METHODS: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the PC complication between inlay and onlay patellar resurfacing techniques. A total of 222 patients who underwent unilateral TKA using a Legion PS Total Knee System were randomized into 2 groups. PC incidence, time of PC presentation, radiographic parameters associated with PC development, and clinical outcomes were evaluated at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS: PC occurred significantly more in the onlay group (17.9% vs 6.5%, P = .009). Time of PC presentation in both groups was not different. Anterior knee pain was found in 11.5% of PC patients, and none required any surgical procedure. Postoperative radiographic parameters, range of motion, Knee Society score, Oxford score, patellar score, incidence and intensity of anterior knee pain, and visual analog scale of overall knee pain were not significantly different between the 2 groups during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: To reduce the chance of PC development, we suggest an inlay patellar resurfacing technique during PS-TKA with this knee system.

Patellar Denervation Reduces Postoperative Anterior Knee Pain After Patellar Resurfacing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of patellar denervation (PD) in patellar resurfacing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still debatable. This prospective, randomized controlled trial investigated whether circumferential PD should be performed in patellar resurfacing TKA. METHODS: A total of 241 patients who underwent unilateral TKA were randomized into PD or non-PD groups. Incidence, intensity, and presentation time of anterior knee pain (AKP) and clinical outcomes were evaluated at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The incidence of AKP was significantly lower in the PD group (6.4% vs 16.2%, P = .032). The intensity of AKP and patient satisfaction scores were significantly better in the PD group at 3 months but not after 3 months. The presentation time of AKP mostly occurs at 3 months after surgery. The Knee Society score, range of motion, Oxford score, patellar score, activity of daily living score, and visual analog scale of overall knee pain were not significantly different between the two groups during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Given that PD can improve AKP and patient satisfaction at an early period postoperatively without jeopardizing clinical outcomes at no additional cost, this inexpensive procedure readily available in nearly every operation room is strongly recommended during primary TKA with patellar resurfacing.

The Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty With and Without Patellar Resurfacing up to 17 Years: A Report From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

BACKGROUND: Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a controversial issue after more than 4 decades of TKA. Despite a growing body of evidence from registry data, resurfacing is still based largely on a surgeon's preference and training. The purpose of this study is to provide long-term outcomes for patellar resurfaced compared to when the patella is not resurfaced. METHODS: Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (1999-2017) were used for this study. The analysis included 570,735 primary TKAs undertaken for osteoarthritis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 17-year cumulative percent revision rates were used to compare revision rates between 4 subgroups: minimally stabilized (MS) patellar resurfacing, posterior stabilized (PS) patellar resurfacing, MS unresurfaced, and PS unresurfaced patella. Additional analyses of the patellar implant type and a comparison of inlay and onlay patellar resurfacing were also performed. RESULTS: For all primary TKA, procedures where the patella was not resurfaced have a higher rate of revision compared to procedures where the patella was resurfaced (HR, 1.31; confidence interval, 1.28-1.35; P < .001). Unresurfaced PS knees have the highest cumulative percent revision at 17 years (11.1%), followed by MS unresurfaced (8.8%), PS resurfaced (7.9%), and MS resurfaced (7.1%). Inlay patellar resurfacing has a higher rate of revision compared to onlay patellar resurfacing (HR, 1.27; confidence interval, 1.17-1.37; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Resurfacing the patella reduces the rate of revision for both MS and PS knees. MS knees with patellar resurfacing have the lowest rate of revision. Onlay patella designs are associated with a lower revision rate compared to inlay patella designs.

Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty using a contemporary patella-friendly implant are unaware of any differences due to patellar resurfacing.

PURPOSE: Anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often unexplained, spurring ongoing debates on the need for patellar resurfacing. It was hypothesized that a contemporary patella-friendly implant would restore patellofemoral kinematics more physiologically than outdated implants and that there would be no perceived or clinically demonstrable differences due to resurfacing of patella (RP). METHODS: This prospective bilateral randomized study was undertaken in 49 patients scheduled for the same-day bilateral TKAs. One knee was subjected at random to RP while withholding RP on the opposing side (non-RP). A recently approved single-radius femoral prosthesis featuring a deep, elongate trochlear groove with lateral tilt and a high lateral flange was implanted bilaterally in all patients. Mean follow-up duration was 5 years. Group comparisons were based on patient-reported outcomes [anterior knee pain, Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and side preference], physician-rated results [Feller patellofemoral (PF) score], radiographic patellar position, patella-related complications, and need for reoperation. RESULTS: There were no differences in midterm rates of anterior knee pain (RP 8%; non-RP 4%; n.s.), FJS (all n.s.), or side preference (RP 47%; non-RP 45%; n.s.), nor did the groups differ by Feller PF score (all n.s.) or radiographic patellar position (all n.s.). No secondary resurfacings of non-RP or RP revisions were required. CONCLUSIONS: Patients were incapable of distinguishing whether RP was done, casting doubt on its benefits. Surgeons may thus forego RP during TKA when using contemporary patella-friendly TKA implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level I.

Patellar Resurfacing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: The management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the evidence regarding the use of patellar resurfacing in TKA. METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to compare outcomes between knees receiving patellar resurfacing vs those not receiving resurfacing during primary TKA. Outcomes of interest were the Knee Society Scores, reoperation rates, anterior knee pain, patient satisfaction, Oxford Knee Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscores, and range of motion. RESULTS: Twenty RCTs met all eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. There were statistically significant differences favoring the resurfaced group in the knee component and functional component of Knee Society Scores that were not clinically significant. There was an increased risk of reoperation among knees that did not receive resurfacing with number needed to treat to prevent one case of reoperation of 25 knees (for reoperation for any reason) and 33 knees (for reoperation for anterior knee pain). There were no statistically significant differences in any other outcomes. CONCLUSION: The only clear relationship is that knees that do not receive patellar resurfacing are more likely to receive reoperation, most often for secondary resurfacing. However, the disease burden of differing complication profiles associated with resurfacing and nonresurfacing groups remains unclear. Continuing to collect data from large, well-designed RCTs would be beneficial in guiding management of the patella during TKA.

Resurfacing in a Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Reduces Patellar Crepitus Complication: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patellar crepitus (PC) is a common complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a posterior-stabilized (PS) prosthesis. While numerous factors have been associated with PC development after PS-TKA, patellar resurfacing (PR) which directly impacts the patellofemoral joint kinematics has been underinvestigated. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted to (1) compare the PC incidence in PR and non-PR PS-TKA, (2) determine the time of PC presentation in PS-TKA, (3) identify radiographic parameters associated with PC, and (4) compare clinical outcomes of patients with and without PR. METHODS: A total of 84 patients who underwent unilateral TKA using the Legion PS Total Knee System were randomized into PR group or non-PR group. PC incidence, time of PC presentation, radiographic parameters associated with PC development, and clinical outcomes were evaluated at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: PC occurred significantly more in the non-PR group (23.1% vs 7.3%, P = .048). Time of PC presentation in both groups was not different. Anterior knee pain was found in 16.7% of crepitus patients, and none required any surgical procedure. The non-PR knees had significant decreases in patellar shift index, patellar displacement, Insall-Salvati ratio, and patellar component height and increase in change in posterior femoral offset. Oxford and patellar scores were significantly better in the PR group at 9 months and 1 year. CONCLUSION: Given higher PC incidence and several worse clinical outcomes in the non-PR, we recommend resurfacing during PS-TKA with this knee system to avoid PC development.

Resurfacing versus not-resurfacing the patella in one-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Resurfacing the patella in one-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains debatable. This study aimed to assess the mid-term outcomes of patients after one-stage bilateral TKA performed with and without patellar resurfacing, respectively, with at least five years of follow-up. METHODS: Sixty-six patients (132 knees) scheduled for first-ever one-stage bilateral TKA due to osteoarthritis received patellar resurfacing and retention, respectively, on one knee and the other, randomly selected. All patients received Scorpio NRG knee prostheses and were evaluated by radiology (anteroposterior, lateral, and axial views) pre-operatively and yearly post-operatively, for at least five years. Knee Society Score and Feller Score values were measured. Anterior knee pain, patellar clunk, and patient satisfaction were assessed. RESULTS: One patient died within five years of operation and four were lost to follow-up. One patient developed severe dementia and could not be constructively questioned. Therefore, 60 patients (120 knees) were finally analyzed. There were significantly improved Knee Society and Feller scores (P < 0.001) in the resurfacing group compared with the non-resurfacing group post-operatively. Anterior knee pain and patellar clunk rates were lower on the resurfaced side compared with the non-resurfaced side (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, 47% and only 7% patients preferred the resurfaced and non-resurfaced sides, respectively, at final follow-up. No revision was performed for patellofemoral complications, and no significant differences were found between the two groups in radiographic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Using the Scorpio NRG knee prosthesis, patellar resurfacing is superior to non-resurfacing in patients with osteoarthritis observed for ≥ five years. REGISTRATION TRIALS NUMBER: NCT03600922 KEY POINTS: • Findings Patellar resurfacing is superior to non-resurfacing in osteoarthritis (OA) patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with the Scorpio NRG knee prosthesis. • Implications Patellar resurfacing should be performed in OA patients during TKA. • Caution Several prosthesis types should be assessed in the same study setting, and multicenter studies are required before generalizability of the present findings.

Predictors for secondary patellar resurfacing after primary total knee arthroplasty using a "patella-friendly" total knee arthroplasty system.

PURPOSE: Patellar resurfacing (PR) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still one of the major controversies in orthopaedic surgery today. The aim of the present retrospective case-control study was to identify predictors for secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR) after initial TKA to create a rationale for surgeons to decide which patients to resurface primarily. It was hypothesized that proper TKA implantation and component positioning as well as a maintained physiological patellar geometry will lead to a reduced risk of SPR. Overmore, it was hypothesized that intrinsic factors like overweight might also have an influence on the need for SPR. METHODS: After identification of suitable patients and age/sex matching in a 1:2 fashion, 29 cases (TKA/SPR) and 58 controls (TKA) were included and screened for available clinical and epidemiological data as well as for radiographic data after primary TKA. Pearson's correlation analysis as well as logistic regression modeling was performed to identify possible predictors for SPR following TKA. RESULTS: Binary logistic regression was able to correctly classify 88.5% of patients into case or control groups. It indicated that patella tilt, patella height, and thickness as well as the delta angle were significant predictors of a need for SPR following primary TKA. An increase in patellar width by 1 mm will increase the risk of SPR, while an increase in patellar thickness by 1 mm will reduce it. An increase in patellar tilt by 1° will also increase the risk of SPR. Finally, an increase in delta angle by 1° will again reduce the risk of SPR. CONCLUSIONS: Easy and accessible radiographic measurements have been identified as possible predictors of SPR following primary TKA. Although indication for primary PR may still remain a controversial topic, a rationale has been proposed in this study to support surgeons in objectively estimating an individual patient's risk for SPR prior to primary TKA measuring the patella tilt, width, and thickness. Overmore, regarding surgical aspects of TKA, tibial component positioning has also been shown to be of importance to reduce the risk of SPR.