Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Psychopathology ; : 1-11, 2024 Mar 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38442702

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hysteria in its most severe expression may reach psychotic manifestations. Such symptomatology has been occasionally described by various authors starting from the 19th century and defined as "hysterical psychosis" (HP) by Hollender and Hirsch in 1964. Currently, diagnostic psychiatric manuals such as DSM and ICD do not include the diagnosis of HP, although this term is commonly used in clinical practice. This raises a well-known problem with case definition due to an inconsistent use of terminology. SUMMARY: Here, we propose a review of the literature that aims to highlight the clinical features of HP endorsed by the majority of authors, such as histrionic premorbid personality, acute reactive onset, short duration, altered state of consciousness, unstable delusions, typical hallucinations, labile mood, lack of flat affect. In the discussion, we focus on the differential diagnosis between HP and other diagnoses such as brief psychosis and schizophrenia, trying to point out aspects of distinction and continuity. KEY MESSAGES: The debate about this nosographic entity still remains a huge dilemma and needs further contributions.

2.
Hist Psychiatry ; 35(3-4): 275-292, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38641948

ABSTRACT

This paper deals with the history and epistemology of acute polymorphic psychosis. We undertook a comparative study of short-lived psychotic disorders used in different European countries since the late nineteenth century. The theory of degeneration offered a speculative basis to conceptualization of conditions such as bouffée délirante, cycloid psychosis and reactive psychosis, but it seems likely that different factors contributed to the profusion of clinical concepts with adverse effects on both nomenclature and classification. The resulting picture suggests that earlier nosological concepts tend to converge on common descriptive features and challenge the diagnostic categories for short-lived psychotic disorders listed in modern symptom-based psychiatric classifications.


Subject(s)
International Classification of Diseases , Psychiatry , Psychotic Disorders , Humans , Psychotic Disorders/history , Psychotic Disorders/classification , History, 19th Century , Europe , International Classification of Diseases/history , Psychiatry/history , History, 20th Century
3.
Nord J Psychiatry ; 75(6): 465-471, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33630694

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Cycloid psychosis (CP) is a clinical entity characterized by sudden onset of psychotic polymorphic symptomatology and fluctuant course. It has a reported rate of psychosocial precipitating factors ranging 30-65%. The aim of the study was to describe all cases of CP, admitted in our Psychiatry ward, during the first two months of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: In this retrospective and observational study, we reported a sample of eight patients who were treated as inpatients in the psychiatric ward of our hospital during the first two months of COVID-19 pandemic (mid-March to mid-May 2020) and compared it with previous years. All our patients fulfilled all four Perris & Brockington criteria for CP. We reported the sociodemographic, clinical and biological parameters. RESULTS: In our sample, all of the patients had maladaptive personality traits; the major external stressing factor was COVID-19; all our patients had short prodromal symptomatology, short Duration of Untreated Psychosis (DUP) and high score at the Positive Scale at Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-P) at hospital admission with the majority showing psychotic symptoms related to the actual COVID-19 pandemic. The predominant treatment during admission was olanzapine and a short time to full remission of psychotic symptoms was observed in all patients. CONCLUSION: We found an increase in the admission of patients with CP during the first two months of the actual pandemic. Stress caused by the COVID-19 situation has possibly incremented the frequency of stress-related disorders and it has also influenced its clinical presentation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Psychotic Disorders , Humans , Pandemics , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Psychiatry Res ; 321: 115068, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36724649

ABSTRACT

An influence of the Covid-19 pandemic on First Episode Psychosis (FEP) has been hypothesized. We previously reported an increase of FEP during the early stages of the pandemic in Milan, Italy. Here we report a 1-year follow-up of the same cohort and comparison with a FEP cohort from 2019. The higher proportion of non-chronic psychoses observed during the pandemic (58.62% in 2020 vs 43,75% in 2019) should be confirmed in larger cohorts over a longer follow-up period.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Psychotic Disorders , Humans , Pandemics , Follow-Up Studies , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Italy , COVID-19 Testing
5.
Psychiatry Res ; 298: 113802, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33592401

ABSTRACT

The ongoing Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic appears to increase risk for mental illness, either directly due to inflammation caused by the virus or indirectly due to related psychosocial stress, resulting in the development of both anxious-depressive and psychotic symptoms. The purpose of the present study was to assess the frequency and characteristics of all patients with First Episodes Psychosis (FEP) without COVID-19 infection hospitalized in the first four months since lockdown in Milan. We recruited sixty-two patients hospitalized between March 8 to July 8, 2020 versus those first  hospitalized in the same period in 2019. The two subgroups were compared for sociodemographic variables and clinical characteristics of the episodes. Patients with FEP in 2020 were significantly older than patients with FEP in 2021, and presented with significantly less substances abuse. Interestingly, patients presenting with FEP in 2020 were significantly older than patients with FEP in 2019. These data are compatible with the greater vulnerability to stressful factors during the pandemic, as well as with the greater concern regarding a possible COVID-19 infection producing brain damage causing the FEP.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Communicable Disease Control , Hospitalization , Psychotic Disorders , Adult , COVID-19/prevention & control , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , Psychotic Disorders/etiology , Psychotic Disorders/therapy
6.
Schizophr Bull ; 47(1): 15-22, 2021 01 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32761196

ABSTRACT

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychosis remains to be established. Here we report 6 cases (3 male and 3 female) of first-episode psychosis (FEP) admitted to our hospital in the second month of national lockdown. All patients underwent routine laboratory tests and a standardized assessment of psychopathology. Hospitalization was required due to the severity of behavioral abnormalities in the context of a full-blown psychosis (the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale [BPRS] = 75.8 ± 14.6). Blood tests, toxicological urine screening, and brain imaging were unremarkable, with the exception of a mild cortical atrophy in the eldest patient (male, 73 years). All patients were negative for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) throughout their stay, but 3 presented the somatic delusion of being infected. Of note, all 6 cases had religious/spiritual delusions and hallucinatory contents. Despite a generally advanced age (53.3 ± 15.6), all patients had a negative psychiatric history. Rapid discharge (length of stay = 13.8 ± 6.9) with remission of symptoms (BPRS = 27.5 ± 3.1) and satisfactory insight were possible after relatively low-dose antipsychotic treatment (Olanzapine-equivalents = 10.1 ± 5.1 mg). Brief psychotic disorder/acute and transient psychotic disorder diagnoses were confirmed during follow-up visits in all 6 cases. The youngest patient (female, 23 years) also satisfied the available criteria for brief limited intermittent psychotic symptoms. Although research on larger populations is necessary, our preliminary observation suggests that intense psychosocial stress associated with a novel, potentially fatal disease and national lockdown restrictions might be a trigger for FEP.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Communicable Disease Control , Delusions , Hallucinations , Psychotic Disorders , Stress, Psychological/complications , Adult , Aged , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Delusions/diagnosis , Delusions/drug therapy , Delusions/etiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hallucinations/diagnosis , Hallucinations/drug therapy , Hallucinations/etiology , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/etiology , Remission Induction , Time Factors , Young Adult
7.
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova ; 120(6. Vyp. 2): 31-36, 2020.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32729688

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of the key psychopathological syndromes, the dynamics and comorbidity of schizophrenia and other psychoses in Russian veterans of local wars receiving hospital treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 685 patients of a psychiatric department of a military hospital, including 264 veterans of the local wars (the main group), 296 people (career military servicemen and retirees), who do not take part in combat actions (the first comparison group) and 125 people matched for the middle age and the age distribution curve with the main group (the second comparison group). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The frequency of psychoses appeared to be slightly less in veterans (7.2%) compared to patients of comparison groups (14.5% and 8.8%, respectively). In all groups, most patients were diagnosed with schizophrenia (ICD-10 F20): 3.8% in the main group, 4.4% in the first comparison group and 4.0% in the second comparison group. Other acute and chronic psychotic disorders (F22-F23) were diagnosed in 0.8, 5.4 and 3.2% patients, respectively. Organic delusion disorders were diagnosed in 1.5% patients of the main group, 3.7% patients of the first comparison group and were not detected in the second comparison group. Comorbidity of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and psychosis was about 2% in the main group in whole and 26.3% in those with schizophrenia and other delusional disorders. The degree of incidence of symptoms of PTSD in veterans diagnosed with psychosis was significantly less than their frequency among all veterans (20% and 46.9%, respectively). Military stress factors do not influence the development of hallucinations and delusions in the main group. In the majority of veterans, psychotic symptoms manifested for the first time after stopping combat stress, the subsequent development and recurrence of psychotic symptoms happened regardless of the influence of combat stress factors.


Subject(s)
Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , Schizophrenia , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Veterans , Comorbidity , Humans , Middle Aged , Russia
8.
J Affect Disord ; 273: 422-424, 2020 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32425275

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak is putting healthcare professionals, especially those in the frontline, under extreme pressures, with a high risk of experiencing physical exhaustion, psychological disturbances, stigmatization, insomnia, depression and anxiety. We report the case of a general practitioner, without relevant somatic or psychiatric history that experienced a "brief reactive psychosis (298.8)" under stressful circumstances derived from COVID-19. She presented with delusional ideas of catastrophe regarding the current pandemic situation, delusions of self-reference, surveillance and persecution, with high affective and behavioural involvement. Physical examination and all further additional investigations did not reveal any secondary causes. She was administered olanzapine 10 mg with significant psychopathological improvement being later discharged with indications to maintain the treatment. To our knowledge this is the first reported case of severe mental illness in a healthcare professional without previous psychiatric history due to COVID-19 outbreak. Around 85% of patients presenting a brief psychotic disorder will develop a potentially disabling serious psychotic illness in the long-term. This case represents the potentially serious mental health consequences on healthcare professionals throughout the COVID-19 crisis and emphasizes the need to implement urgent measures to maintain staff mental health during the current pandemic.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/psychology , Health Personnel/psychology , Pneumonia, Viral/psychology , Psychotic Disorders/virology , Adult , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Mental Health , Pandemics , Psychotic Disorders/psychology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL