Gilteritinib-based combination therapy in adult relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia.

Gilteritinib, a potent FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor, was approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients but still showed limited efficacy. Here, we retrospectively analysed the efficacy and safety of different gilteritinib-based combination therapies (gilteritinib plus hypomethylating agent and venetoclax, G + HMA + VEN; gilteritinib plus HMA, G + HMA; gilteritinib plus venetoclax, G + VEN) in 33 R/R FLT3-mutated AML patients. The composite complete response (CRc) and modified CRc (mCRc) rates were 66.7% (12/18) and 88.9% (16/18) in patients received G + HMA + VEN, which was higher compared with that in G + HMA (CRc: 18.2%, 2/11; mCRc: 45.5%, 5/11) or G + VEN (CRc: 50.0%, 2/4; mCRc: 50.0%, 2/4). The median overall survival (OS) for G + HMA + VEN, G + HMA and G + VEN treatment was not reached, 160.0 days and 231.0 days. The median duration of remission (DOR) for G + HMA + VEN, G + HMA and G + VEN treatment was not reached, 82.0 days and 77.0 days. Four patients in the G + HMA + VEN group received alloHSCT after remission exhibited prolonged median DOR. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were cytopenia, febrile neutropenia and pulmonary infection; there were no differences among the three groups. In conclusion, our data demonstrated promising response of G + HMA + VEN combination therapy in R/R FLT3-mutated AML, and it may be considered an effective therapy bridge to transplantation.

A CD38/CD3xCD28 trispecific T-cell engager as a potentially active agent in multiple myeloma patients relapsed and/or refractory to anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies.

There is accumulating evidence of BCMA and GPRC5D loss after treatment with T-cell redirecting therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). While complete CD38 loss is not observed upon relapses after treatment with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAb), there is downregulation of surface CD38 expression and decreased number and function of NK cells, which renders these patients resistant to retreatment with anti-CD38 mAb. Here, we provide preclinical evidence that RRMM patients previously exposed to anti-CD38 mAb could benefit from T-cell-based immunotherapy that depend less on CD38 antigen density and NK-cell activity, such as the novel CD38/CD3xCD28 trispecific T-cell engager, SAR442257.

Real-world evidence on treatment pattern, effectiveness, and safety of blinatumomab in Chinese patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Blinatumomab is efficacious in patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), yet limited real-world data exists in this context. This retrospective study provided real-world data on the treatment pattern, effectiveness, and safety of blinatumomab in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed (ND) and relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-ALL. Patients with B-ALL who received at least one dose of blinatumomab in frontline or R/R settings between August 2021 and June 2023 were included. The primary outcome was the treatment pattern of blinatumomab. Key secondary outcomes included complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete blood cell recovery (CRi) rate, minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, median event-free survival (EFS), and safety. The study included 96 patients with B-ALL; 53 (55.2%) patients were in the ND group and 43 (44.8%) patients were in the R/R group. The median treatment duration was one cycle (range: 1-5). Most patients underwent chemotherapies, allo-HSCT, or experimental CAR-T following blinatumomab. The ND patients using blinatumomab induction therapy achieved 100% CR/CRi rate; 87.2% achieved MRD negativity within two cycles of blinatumomab. In R/R re-induction patients, the CR/CRi rate was 50%; MRD negativity rate was 64.2%. In R/R patients using blinatumomab for consolidation, MRD negativity rate was 90.9%. The median EFS was not reached in both ND and R/R patients; 1-year EFS rate was 90.8% (95% CI: 67%, 97%) and 55.1% (95% CI: 30%, 74%), respectively. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were observed in 12.5% patients. Blinatumomab was found to be effective with a tolerable safety profile in real world setting.

Sirolimus is effective and safe in childhood relapsed-refractory autoimmune cytopenias: A multicentre study.

Autoimmune cytopenias are a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by immune-mediated destruction of haematopoietic cell lines. Effective and well-tolerated treatment options for relapsed-refractory immune cytopenias are limited. In this study, the aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sirolimus in this disease group within the paediatric age group. The study enrolled patients in the paediatric age group who used sirolimus with a diagnosis of immune cytopenia between December 2010 and December 2020, followed at six centres in Turkey. Of the 17 patients, five (29.4%) were treated for autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA), six (35.2%) for immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) and six (35.2%) for Evans syndrome (ES). The mean response time was 2.7 months (range, 0-9 months). Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) were obtained in 13 of 17 patients (76.4%) and nonresponse (NR) in four patients (23.5%). Among the 13 patients who achieved CR, three of them were NR in the follow-up and two of them had remission with low-dose steroid and sirolimus. Thus, overall response rate (ORR) was achieved in 12 of 17 patients (70.5%). In conclusion, sirolimus may be an effective and safe option in paediatric patients with relapsed-refractory immune cytopenia.

Predictive model for CAR-T cell therapy success in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in treating relapsed/refractory acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukaemia (R/R B-ALL). However, a subset of patients does not benefit from CAR-T therapy. Our study aims to identify predictive indicators and establish a model to evaluate the feasibility of CAR-T therapy. Fifty-five R/R B-ALL patients and 22 healthy donors were enrolled. Peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets were analysed using flow cytometry. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) areas under the curve (AUC) were determined to evaluate the predictive values of the indicators. We identified B lymphocyte, regulatory T cell (Treg) and peripheral blood minimal residual leukaemia cells (B-MRD) as indicators for predicting the success of CAR-T cell preparation with AUC 0.936, 0.857 and 0.914. Furthermore, a model based on CD3+ T count, CD4+ T/CD8+ T ratio, Treg and extramedullary diseases (EMD) was used to predict the response to CAR-T therapy with AUC of 0.938. Notably, a model based on CD4+ T/CD8+ T ratio, B, Treg and EMD were used in predicting the success of CAR-T therapy with AUC 0.966 [0.908-1.000], with specificity (92.59%) and sensitivity (91.67%). In the validated group, the predictive model predicted the success of CAR-T therapy with specificity (90.91%) and sensitivity (100%). We have identified several predictive indicators for CAR-T cell therapy success and a model has demonstrated robust predictive capacity for the success of CAR-T therapy. These results show great potential for guiding informed clinical decisions in the field of CAR-T cell therapy.

Progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of the research was to assess the quantitative relationship between median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) specifically among patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) based on published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: Two bibliographic databases (PubMed and Embase, 1970-2017) were systematically searched for RCTs in RRMM that reported OS and PFS, followed by an updated search of studies published between 2010 and 2022 in 3 databases (Embase, MEDLINE, and EBM Reviews, 2010-2022). The association between median PFS and median OS was assessed using the nonparametric Spearman rank and parametric Pearson correlation coefficients. Subsequently, the quantitative relationship between PFS and OS was assessed using weighted least-squares regression adjusted for covariates including age, sex, and publication year. Study arms were weighted by the number of patients in each arm. RESULTS: A total of 31 RCTs (56 treatment arms, 10,450 patients with RRMM) were included in the analysis. The average median PFS and median OS were 7.1 months (SD 5.5) and 28.1 months (SD 11.8), respectively. The Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients between median PFS and median OS were 0.80 (P < 0.0001) and 0.79 (P < 0.0001), respectively. In individual treatment arms of RRMM trials, each 1-month increase in median PFS was associated with a 1.72-month (95% CI 1.26-2.17) increase in median OS. CONCLUSION: Analysis of the relationship between PFS and OS incorporating more recent studies in RRMM further substantiates the use of PFS to predict OS in RRMM.

Venetoclax in biomarker-selected multiple myeloma patients: Impact of exposure on clinical efficacy and safety.

Venetoclax, a potent BCL-2 inhibitor, is currently under development for treatment of t(11;14) Multiple myeloma (MM). The objective of this research was to investigate the exposure-response relationships of venetoclax for a phase 1/2 study evaluating venetoclax monotherapy or in combination with dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory MM. A total of 117 patients receiving venetoclax at 300, 600, 800, 900, or 1200 mg were included in the analysis. The impact of venetoclax exposures on efficacy (objective response rate [ORR], progression-free survival [PFS] and overall survival [OS]) as well as safety (treatment-emergent adverse effects (grade ≥3) of neutropenia, infection, and any grade of serious treatment-emergent adverse effects) was evaluated. In the t(11;14)-positive subpopulation, venetoclax exposure relationships to PFS and OS indicated a trend of longer PFS and OS with higher exposures. Moreover, logistic regression analyses for clinical response (ORR and ≥VGPR rate) demonstrated a statistically significant (p < 0.05) relationship with exposure. Evaluation of the exposure-safety relationships demonstrated a lack of a relationship between venetoclax exposures (AUCavg ) and grade ≥3 infections, grade ≥3 neutropenia, grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events or any grade serious treatment-emergent adverse events. These findings support further study of venetoclax at 800 mg QD dose in combination with dexamethasone in the t(11;14)-positive patient population where increased efficacy was observed without an increase in safety events.Clinical Trial: NCT01794520 registered 20 February 2013.

Characterizing second line and beyond therapies for primary central nervous system lymphomas.

Primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare and aggressive lymphoma that affects the CNS without other systemic involvement. High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX)-based regimens are recommended frontline treatment, followed by consolidation with either high-dose chemotherapy, whole brain radiation (WBRT) +/- sequential temozolomide (TMZ), or autologous stem cell transplant (autoSCT). Despite advancements with HDMTX and rituximab, up to half of patients will relapse. Treatment for relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease varies widely as preferred regimens are not well-established. Our study aimed to provide real-world characterization of R/R PCNSL therapies. The secondary objective was characterization of consolidation methods after frontline treatment. This retrospective, descriptive analysis included 54 adult PCNSL patients that received a HDMTX-based frontline regimen between 4/1/2016 and 7/1/2022. Patients receiving HDMTX for the purpose of secondary CNS lymphoma, non-B cell origin PCNSL, and intraocular lymphoma were excluded. Thirty-one patients (57%) received consolidation therapy with rituximab and high-dose cytarabine (R-HDAC), WBRT, or both. Thirteen patients (24%) proceeded with autoSCT. Twenty-five patients had disease progression, with 17 patients receiving second line treatment. The second line treatments were WBRT (24%), clinical trial (18%), rituximab with lenalidomide (R2; 18%), re-induction with HDMTX-based regimens (18%), ibrutinib with rituximab (12%) and R-HDAC (12%). Seven patients progressed, and all received third line treatment. Treatments varied, including R2; ibrutinib +/- HDMTX; rituximab, methotrexate, and cytarabine; R-HDAC; R-nivolumab; and WBRT. Five patients received a fourth line regimen of R +/- lenalidomide, R-HDMTX, or nivolumab monotherapy. Regimens used for the three patients who received fifth line treatment and beyond included R-TMZ and pembrolizumab monotherapy in addition to previously described regimens. Regimen selection is varied and highly dependent on physician preference and patient factors, including clinical trial eligibility, prior therapies, performance status, organ function, and treatment intent. Prospective clinical trials are needed to guide optimal management.

Predicting relapsed/refractory disease in childhood hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis based on clinical features at diagnosis: A 13-year single-institute retrospective study in Thailand.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening disease. Relapsed/refractory disease is the main cause of death. This study aims to determine the prognostic indicators for relapsed/refractory disease in childhood HLH (R/R HLH). Infants and children under 18 years of age who were diagnosed with HLH according to HLH-2004 criteria, MAS-HLH criteria for rheumatologic diseases, or H-score undergoing treatment in Chiang Mai University hospital between 2010 and 2022 were included. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, and laboratory parameters were retrospectively reviewed. Out of 86 childhood HLH cases, 30 patients (34.9%) experienced R/R HLH. All patients with primary HLH developed R/R HLH. The most common form of secondary HLH was infection-associated hemophagocytic syndrome (IAHS), comprising 43 cases. Of these, 37.2% had relapsed or refractory disease. Univariable analysis identified several potential risk factors for R/R HLH, including younger age, severe disease status, higher HLH-2004 criteria scores, higher H-scores, overt DIC, higher pSOFA scores, and increased levels of aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, and direct bilirubin. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that a pSOFA score of ≥ 8 and age < 3 years were independent risk factors for R/R HLH, with adjusted odds ratios of 6.35 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-34.19; P = 0.032) and 3.62 (95% CI, 1.04-12.63; P = 0.044), respectively. Children with HLH who have a pSOFA score of ≥ 8, or are younger than 3 years, are at a higher risk of relapsed or refractory disease. Further evaluation of management strategies in this context is warranted.

A prospective, multicenter, observational study of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in Japan.

Real-world studies permit inclusion of a more diverse patient population and provide more information on the effectiveness of treatments used in routine clinical practice. This prospective, multicenter, observational study investigated the effectiveness and safety of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd) in 295 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in routine clinical practice in Japan. Patients had a median age of 74 years, 80.0% were aged ≥ 65 years, 42.0% had received ≥ 3 lines of prior treatment, and 28.5% were "frail" according to the International Myeloma Working Group frailty score. After a median follow-up of 25.0 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.3 (95% CI 12.4-19.5) months, while median overall survival was not reached. The overall response rate was 53.9%, and 31.5% of patients had a very good partial response or better. In the subgroup analysis, median PFS was better in patients with 1 versus 2 or ≥ 3 lines of prior treatment (29.0 vs 19.2 or 6.9 months) and paraprotein versus clinical relapse (16.0 vs 7.9 months), but median PFS was not notably affected by frailty score or age group. Dose adjustment was more frequent among patients aged > 75 years, especially early after IRd treatment initiation. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade occurred in 84.4% of patients and 24.7% of patients discontinued treatment due to TEAEs; no new safety concerns were found. These findings suggest that oral IRd triplet regimen is an effective and tolerable treatment option for RRMM patients in real-world settings outside of clinical trials.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03433001; Date of registration: 14 February 2018.

A phase Ib trial of isatuximab, bendamustine, and prednisone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with triple-class refractory (TCR) multiple myeloma (MM) often need cytoreductive chemotherapy for rapid disease control. Bendamustine is an outpatient-administered, bifunctional alkylator and isatuximab is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody with unique cytotoxicity characteristics. We hypothesized that isatuximab-bendamustine-prednisone would be well-tolerated regimen in TCR MM, and conducted single-center, phase Ib, investigator-initiated study. PATIENTS/METHODS: Patients had TCR MM and last daratumumab exposure ≥ 6 weeks. This study was conducted as a 3 + 3 design to establish the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Isatuximab 10 mg/kg IV was administered weekly (cycle 1), and every 2 weeks thereafter. Bendamustine was administered on days 1 and 2 at 3 dose levels (DL): 50, 75, and 100 mg/m2. Methylprednisolone was administered as 125 mg on day 1 and prednisone 60 mg days 2-4. Common definitions were used for DLTs, adverse events (CTCAE v 5.0), and disease response. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were treated (3 DL1, 6 DL2, 6 DL3). Median age was 71, 53% had high-risk cytogenetics, and 34% had prior BCMA-targeting therapy. One DLT was observed at DL2 (Grade 3 thrombocytopenia plus bleeding). There were no Grade 5 treatment-related AEs. The MTD was not reached. The overall response rate was 20% (3/15) including one stringent complete response. The median PFS was 2.5 months (95% CI 0.9-4.1 months). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the safety and tolerability of isatuximab-bendamustine-prednisone. Toxicities were mild and manageable with limited intervention. The study was discontinued due to slow accrual. However, we observed responses even among highly refractory patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04083898 on 9/6/2019.

The clinical efficacy of a daratumumab-based regimen in relapsed/refractory acute leukemia: a single-center experience.

Relapsed/refractory acute leukemia (R/R-AL) is associated with a low remission rate, short survival rate, and poor prognosis. Treating R/R-AL remains challenging as there is no standardized effective regimen; hence, there is a need for efficient therapies. CD38 expression has been observed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Daratumumab is a humanized anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody used to treat multiple myeloma and has been reported to treat R/R-AL safely and effectively. The clinical data of 10 adult patients with R/R-AL who were treated with a daratumumab-based salvage regimen between July 2018 and May 2023 at our center were analyzed retrospectively. Seven AML and three ALL cases were included in the analysis. Seven (70%) patients showed responses to the treatments (complete response [CR], 60%; partial response [PR], 10%). Of the seven responders, three underwent allogenic stem cell transplantation (ASCT), including one who underwent a second ASCT. Among the five patients with R/R AML who had prior exposure to venetoclax, three achieved a therapeutic response (two CR and one PR) when re-treated with venetoclax in combination with daratumumab. The median follow-up time was 6.15 months (0.9-21 months). Overall survival and event-free survival rates at 12 months were 68.6% and 40.0%, respectively. The main adverse events included grade 3 febrile neutropenia (20%) and grade 3 hematological toxicities (60%). The daratumumab-based salvage regimen offers patients with R/R-AL the opportunity of remission with acceptable tolerability, creating the possibility of bridging ASCT.

Optimization of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment planning for relapsed or refractory extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma.

Pembrolizumab (anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 inhibitor) is a promising salvage therapeutic option for relapsed/refractory extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma (R/R ENKTL). However, the appropriate duration of pembrolizumab use in R/R ENKTL patients and the optimal timing for administering pembrolizumab remain undetermined. We collected and analyzed clinical information on R/R ENKTL 58 patients who received pembrolizumab to evaluate the optimal treatment durations and clinical information for considering treatment interruption. Treatment outcomes were assessed by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) and Epstein Barr virus DNA (EBV DNA) every 3 months. Nineteen (32.8%) patients had been treated with more than three chemotherapies before pembrolizumab administration. The best response rate towards the first try of pembrolizumab was 38.9% (31.5% complete response rate (CR), 7.4% partial response (PR)). During the 41.8-month median follow-up duration, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.1 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 7.1 months. The failure group, which was characterized by Deaville score (DS) 3-4 and circulating EBV detection, or DS 5 with/without EBV detection, had the worst PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001), followed by the high (DS 1-2 and EBV detection, or DS 3-4 and EBV not detected) and low-risk groups (DS 1-2 and EBV not detected). Among the 21 patients who achieved the best response at the first pembolizumab try, the patients who received planned 24 cycles presented better PFS than those who received incomplete cycles (57.6 months vs 20.9 months, P-value = 0.012). Among 13 patients who received avelumab or pembrolizumab in advance, a few who responded to the second trial of pembrolizumab administration had over one year of chemotherapy vacation. Determining the discontinuation or continuation of pembrolizumab would be considered in selected cases assessed by PET-CT and EBV monitoring. Disruption of pembrolizumab treatment may be advisable for the low-risk group(DS 1-2 and EBV not detected), whereas continuation could be warranted for the high-risk group (DS 1-2 and EBV detection, or DS 3-4 and EBV not detected). Moreover, it might be critical to maintain over 24 cycles to improve the survival outcome of R/R ENKTL.

Efficacy of ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone regimen in daratumumab-exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients: A retrospective analysis.

We performed retrospective analysis of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients previously exposed to daratumumab treated with ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (IRd) regimen in real clinical practice. Our aim was to evaluate efficacy of IRd in these patients and select a subset of patients that would benefit from this treatment the most. In total, we analyzed 43 daratumumab-exposed RRMM patients treated in our center. Minimal response or better was achieved by 53.5% of patients from the cohort. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.56 months (95% CI: 2.56, 8.03) and median overall survival (OS) was 28.92 months (95% CI: 5.4, NR). Duration of response (DOR) was evaluable in 28 patients and reached a median of 21.3 months (95% CI: 6.85, NR). Next, we evaluated hazard ratios (HR) for OS and PFS. There was improved OS in patients that were not-triple refractory or worse (HR = 0.39, 95%Cl (0.14; 1.10), p = .07) and in patients, that had less than three previous lines of treatment (LOT) (HR = 0.13, 95%Cl (0.03; 0.6) p = .003). Similar to OS, there was improved PFS in patients, that were not triple-refractory or worse (HR = 0.52, 95%Cl (0.25; 1.10), p = .08). We concluded, that the best survival benefit for RRMM patients pretreated with daratumumab to IRd regimen was observed in patients that were not triple-refractory and had less than three previous lines of treatment (LOT). The DOR in these patients was 21.3 months (95% CI: 6.85, NR).

Treatment with low-dose, single-agent belantamab mafodotin is safe and provides long-term responses in heavily pretreated multiple myeloma patients.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether low-dose belantamab mafodotin (B-MAF) dosing results in lower toxicity and better overall outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated nine consecutive patients treated with low-dose (1.9 mg/kg) B-MAF. RESULTS: The median age was 70 years. Most patients were penta-refractory. Ocular toxicity was observed in 77.7%. Adverse events resulting in treatment delays were recorded in 9 out of 124 cycles being given. Overall response rate was 66% (6/9), and all responding patients achieved very good partial response or better. Within a median follow-up of 12 (range 0.5-13.8) months, median progression-free survival and overall survival were 14 (CI95% 6-22) and 20 (95%CI 0-41) months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Low-dose B-MAF regimen showed high-efficacy and low-toxicity profile.

Effectiveness and safety of belantamab mafodotin in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in real-world setting: The ALFA study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this noninterventional, retrospective ALFA study was to describe belantamab mafodotin effectiveness and safety in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in a real-world setting in France. METHODS: Response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety were assessed. RESULTS: Among the 184 patients initiating belantamab mafodotin treatment, the overall response rate was 32.7% (≥very good partial response [VGPR] 20.4%, partial response [PR] 12.3%). The median PFS (mPFS) was 2.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9, 3.3), and median OS (mOS) was 8.8 months (95% CI: 6.3, 11.6). According to best response, mPFS was 20.6 months (95% CI: 12.1, not reached [NR]) in patients with ≥VGPR and 7.1 months (95% CI: 4.6, 9.4) in patients with PR; mOS was NR in patients with ≥VGPR and 17.5 months (95% CI: 7.7, NR) in patients with PR. For both OS and PFS, no differences were found in subgroups of interest. The adverse events (AEs) reported in 159 patients (86.4%) were mostly ocular AEs. CONCLUSIONS: ALFA, the largest real-world cohort conducted so far, confirms the results of belantamab mafodotin as reported in the DREAMM-2 clinical trial. The clinical benefit is significant as long as the patient is a responder.

Impact of prior lenalidomide or proteasome inhibitor exposure on the effectiveness of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A pooled analysis from the INSURE study.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the impact of prior exposure and refractoriness to lenalidomide or proteasome inhibitors (PIs) on the effectiveness and safety of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). METHODS: INSURE is a pooled analysis of adult RRMM patients who had received IRd in ≥2 line of therapy from three studies: INSIGHT MM, UVEA-IXA, and REMIX. RESULTS: Overall, 391/100/68 were lenalidomide-naïve/-exposed/-refractory and 37/411/110 were PI-naïve/-exposed/-refractory. Median duration of therapy (DOT) was 15.3/15.6/4.7 months and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21.6/25.8/5.6 months in lenalidomide-naïve/exposed/refractory patients. Median DOT and PFS in PI-naïve/exposed/refractory patients were 20.4/15.2/6.9 months and not reached/19.8/11.4 months, respectively. The proportion of lenalidomide-naïve/exposed/refractory patients in INSIGHT and UVEA-IXA who discontinued a study drug due to adverse events (AEs) was ixazomib, 31.6/28.2/28.0% and 18.6/6.7/10.5%; lenalidomide, 21.9/28.2/16.0% and 16.1/6.7/10.5%; dexamethasone, 18.4/20.5/16.0% and 10.6/0/10.5%, respectively. The proportion of PI-naïve/exposed/refractory patients in INSIGHT and UVEA-IXA who discontinued a study drug due to AEs was: ixazomib, 44.4/28.8/27.8% and 22.2/16.7/15.7%; lenalidomide, 33.3/22.0/19.4% and 16.7/15.9/11.8%; dexamethasone, 33.3/17.4/16.7% and 16.7/9.5/7.8%, respectively. REMIX AE discontinuation rates were unavailable. CONCLUSION: IRd appeared to be effective in RRMM patients in routine clinical practice regardless of prior lenalidomide or PI exposure, with better outcomes seen in lenalidomide- and/or PI-nonrefractory versus refractory patients.

Intensive salvage chemotherapy with VDTPACE or mCBAD followed by hematopoietic stem-cell support for refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma.

INTRODUCTION: Triple- and quad-refractory multiple myeloma patients usually have an aggressive course and a poor prognosis. Available therapeutic options are scarce. METHODS: The objective of the current study was to evaluate responses and toxicities of VDTPACE or mCBAD with hematopoietic stem-cell support as a bridge to subsequent therapies in patients with refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were included (11 mCBAD, 2 VDTPACE), and 21 cycles of chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell support were delivered. Mean number of previous therapies was 4.8. Stem cells were infused on a median day 9.9 after chemotherapy. Mean time to neutrophil recovery was 18.2 days in patients receiving the first cycle and 15.9 following subsequent cycles. Before therapy, most patients were in PD (77%), PR (15%), or VGPR (8%). Following treatment, the best responses achieved were PR (46%), VGPR (46%), and CR (8%). Median overall and progression-free survivals were 17 and 9 months. There has been no case of non-relapse mortality. In the 21 cycles, the main complications were infectious. CONCLUSION: Intensive chemotherapy can decrease disease burden in patients with relapsed/refractory MM, and stem-cell support can successfully decrease toxicities and treatment-related mortality associated with these regimens and may be a good bridging option.

An open-label, first-in-human, single agent, dose escalation study for the evaluation of safety and efficacy of SAR442085 in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

OBJECTIVES: Cluster of differentiation 38 (CD38) is a key target on multiple myeloma (MM) cells. This multi-centre, Phase 1, single-agent study (NCT04000282) investigated SAR442085, a novel fragment crystallisable (Fc)-modified anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb), with enhanced affinity towards Fc-gamma receptor on effector cells in patients with relapsed and/or refractory (RR) MM. METHODS: This study comprised two parts: Part-A (dose-escalation involving anti-CD38 mAb pre-treated and naïve patients) and Part-B (dose expansion). Primary endpoints were maximum tolerated dose and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). RESULTS: Thirty-seven heavily pre-treated patients were treated in Part A. Part-B (dose-expansion) was not studied. Seven dose-limiting toxicities were reported at DL3, DL5, DL6, and DL7. RP2D was determined to be 5-7·5 mg/kg. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events were infusion-related reactions in 70·3% (26/37) patients. Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia was reported in 48·6% (18/37). Overall response rate was 70% in anti-CD38 mAb naïve and 4% in anti-CD38 pre-treated patients, with a median progression-free survival of 7·62 (95%CI: 2·858; not calculable) months and 2·79 (95%CI: 1·150; 4·172) months and, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of SAR442085 was promising in anti-CD38 mAb naïve patients but did not extend to the larger cohort of anti-CD38 mAb pre-treated patients. This observation, along with transient high-grade thrombocytopenia, could potentially limit its clinical use.

Real-world treatment patterns in patients initiating third-line therapy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, France, and Spain.

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively analyze real-world treatment patterns in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who initiated third-line treatment in Europe. METHODS: German and Italian administrative claims data were sourced from the German AOK PLUS health insurance fund and Italian local health units (2016-2020). Data for the United Kingdom (UK), France, and Spain were sourced from medical chart reviews (MCRs) from 2016 to 2018 (historical) and 2019 to 2021 (new) using electronic case report forms. RESULTS: Across all countries, immunomodulatory imide drug (IMiD)-based regimens were prominent in the third-line setting. From 2016 to 2020, lenalidomide-dexamethasone was most common in Italy (18.0%) and Germany (12.7%). From 2019 to 2021, the most common regimen was ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (67.5%) in the UK, pomalidomide-dexamethasone (17.1%) in France, and daratumumab-bortezomib-dexamethasone (15.0%) in Spain. In the historical data (2016-2018), third-line lenalidomide- and pomalidomide-dexamethasone doublet use across the UK (>47%), France (>46%), and Spain (>33%) was high. From historical to new, triplet use increased in Spain (>19% to >60%) as did anti-CD38 agent use in France (15.1% to 51.9%) and Spain (19.7% to 42.1%). CONCLUSIONS: From 2016 to 2021, third-line regimens were mostly IMiD based. The MCR data demonstrated evolving treatment choices from 2016 to 2018 and 2019 to 2021, providing insights into uptake of novel agents and current RRMM European clinical practice.