Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
J Environ Manage ; 255: 109829, 2020 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31783208

ABSTRACT

Anthropogenic pressures are causing substantial degradation to the freshwater ecosystems globally and Malaysia has not escaped such a bleak scenario. Prompted by the predicament, this study's objective was to pioneer a river assessment system that can be readily adopted to monitor, manage and drive improvement in a wholesome manner. Three sets of a priori metrics were selected to form the Ichthyofaunal Quality Index (IQI: biological), Water Quality Index (WQI: chemical) and River Physical Quality Index (RPQI: physical). These indices were further integrated on equal weighting to construct a novel Malaysian River Integrity Index (MyRII). To test its robustness, the MyRII protocol was field tested in four eco-hydrological zones located in the Kampar River water basin for 18 months to reveal its strengths, weaknesses, and establish the "excellent", "good", "average", "poor" and "impaired" thresholds based on the "best performer" reference site in an empirical manner. The resultant MyRII showed a clear trend that corresponded with different levels of river impairment. Test site zone A which was a reference site with minimal disturbance achieved the highest MyRII (88.95 ± 4.29), followed by partially disturbed zone B (61.95 ± 5.90) and heavily disturbed zone C (50.00 ± 4.29). However, the MyRII in zone D (59.9 ± 6.39), which was a heavily disturbed wetland that was disjointed from the river, did not conform to such trend. Also unveiled and recognized, however, are some unexpected nuances, limitations and challenges that emerged from this study. These are critically discussed as precautions when interpreting and implementing the MyRII protocol. This study adds to the mounting body of evidence that water resource stakeholders and policymakers must look at the big picture and adopt the "balanced ecosystem" mind-set when assessing, restoring and managing the rivers as a freshwater resource.


Subject(s)
Ecosystem , Rivers , Benchmarking , Environmental Monitoring , Malaysia , Water Quality
2.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 30(53): 114556-114568, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37861837

ABSTRACT

Due to the striving for the development of economy and agriculture, anthropogenic activities in many countries dramatically alter natural hydrology. These activities are primarily responsible for river deterioration. Thus, we need to assess the river environment and take measures for remediation. According to the survey data, the study identified the critical factors causing water quality deterioration and evaluated the aquatic biodiversity in the Wanyu River. First, based on the monitoring data of water (dissolved oxygen (DO), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total phosphorus (TP), and ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N)), sediment (copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), lead (Pb), arsenic (As), nickel (Ni), mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd), and chromium (Cr)), and aquatic biodiversity (fish and hydrophyte), the study identified the critical factors causing river quality deterioration. Second, the study provided some recommendations that would consolidate the restoration efforts. Consequently, because of the government's efforts in building the municipal sewage treatment plant, dredging, and other measures, the river environment improved during the 2020-2021 period. The maximum concentrations of COD, NH3-N, and TP in water were reduced by 17.76%, 26.17%, and 20.93%, respectively. The sediment had no risk of heavy metal pollution in the past 2 years. And we could utilize sludge as garden soil or compost resource. However, reducing agricultural pollution, internal nutrient loading, and cost-effective restoration and evaluation represent significant challenges in the efforts to recover the river ecosystem.


Subject(s)
Mercury , Metals, Heavy , Water Pollutants, Chemical , Ecosystem , Environmental Monitoring , Rivers , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Metals, Heavy/analysis , Mercury/analysis , Water Quality , China , Phosphorus/analysis , Risk Assessment , Geologic Sediments
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32674286

ABSTRACT

Contamination of natural water sources is one of the main health problems worldwide, which could be caused by chemicals, metals, or microbial agents. This study aimed to analyze the quality of 18 rivers located in Quito, the capital province of Pichincha, Ecuador, through physico-chemical and microbial parameters. The E. coli and total coliforms assessments were performed by a counting procedure in growth media. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was realized to detect several microbial genera, as well as Candida albicans, two parasites (Cryptosporidium and Giardia spp.) and E. coli pathotypes: enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC) and enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC). Additionally, physico-chemical parameters and major and trace metals were analyzed in each surface water sample. Our results demonstrated that most of the rivers analyzed do not comply with the microbial, physico-chemical, and metal requirements established by the Ecuadorian legislation. In terms of microbial pollution, the most polluted rivers were Monjas, Machángara, Pisque, and Pita Rivers. Furthermore, three out of four analyzed E. coli pathotypes (EIEC, EHEC, and EAEC) were detected in certain rivers, specifically: Monjas River showed the presence of EIEC and EHEC; in the Machángara River, EAEC and EIEC were detected; and finally, EIEC was present in the Guayllabamba River. Several physico-chemical parameters, such as pH, CODtotal, and TSS values, were higher than the Ecuadorian guidelines in 11, 28, and 28% of the rivers, respectively. Regarding heavy metals, Zn, Cu, Ni, Pb, Cd, and Mn surpassed the established values in 94, 89, 61, 22, 22, and 17% of the rivers, respectively. Machangara River was the only one that registered higher Cr concentrations than the national guidelines. The values of Al and Fe were above the recommended values in 83 and 72% of the rivers. Overall, based on the physical-chemical and microbiological parameters the most contaminated rivers were Machángara and Monjas. This study revealed severe contaminations in Ecuadorean Rivers; further studies should evaluate the sources of contamination and their impact on public health.


Subject(s)
Cryptosporidiosis , Cryptosporidium , Metals, Heavy , Water Pollutants, Chemical , Animals , Ecuador , Environmental Monitoring , Geologic Sediments , Metals, Heavy/analysis , Rivers , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis
4.
Sci Total Environ ; 659: 1186-1198, 2019 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31096332

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the occurrence of 135 contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) - pharmaceuticals, pesticides, a set of endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) (parabens, bisphenols, hormones, triazoles, organophosphorus flame retardants and triclosan), UV-filters, perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and halogenated flame retardants (HFRs) - in 59 fish samples, collected in 2010 in 4 Spanish Rivers (Guadalquivir, Júcar, Ebro and Llobregat). Of the 135 CECs, 76 including 8 pharmaceuticals, 25 pesticides, 10 EDCs, 5 UV-filters, 15 PFASs and 13 HFRs were detected. Pharmaceuticals were the less frequently found and at lower concentrations. Pesticides, EDCs, UV-filters, PFASs and HFRs were detected more frequently (>50% of the samples). The maximum concentrations were 15 ng/g dry weight (dw) for pharmaceuticals (diclofenac), 840 ng/g dw for pesticides (chlorpyrifos), 224 ng/g dw for EDCs (bisphenol A), 242 ng/g dw for UV-filters (EHMC), 1738 ng/g dw for PFASs (PFHxA) and 64 ng/g dw for HFRs (Dec 602). The contaminants detected in fish are commonly detected also in sediments. In light of current knowledge, the risk assessment revealed that there was no risk for humans related to the exposure to CECs via freshwater fish consumption. However, results provide detailed information on the mixtures of CECs accumulated that would be very useful to identify their effects on aquatic biota.


Subject(s)
Environmental Monitoring , Fishes/metabolism , Water Pollutants, Chemical/metabolism , Animals , Endocrine Disruptors/analysis , Endocrine Disruptors/metabolism , Flame Retardants/analysis , Flame Retardants/metabolism , Fresh Water/chemistry , Geologic Sediments/chemistry , Halogenated Diphenyl Ethers/analysis , Halogenated Diphenyl Ethers/metabolism , Pesticides/analysis , Pesticides/metabolism , Rivers/chemistry , Spain , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis
5.
Sci Total Environ ; 610-611: 244-257, 2018 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28803200

ABSTRACT

Assessment of the ecological status of rivers is key to monitoring the achievement of the environmental goal of the EU Water Framework Directive and the success of restoration projects. In summer of 2009 and 2010, repeated assessments of physical habitat conditions and of fish and benthic invertebrate communities were performed at low-flow conditions in 10 unmanaged and 10 channelized cross-sections of the Biala River, Polish Carpathians. Between the two surveys, an 80-year flood occurred, significantly affecting habitat characteristics and river communities. In unmanaged cross-sections, active channel width increased, whereas the degree of cross-sectional variation of flow velocity decreased. In channelized cross-sections, the increase in active channel width and the cross-sectional variation of flow velocity was accompanied by a decrease in bed-material grain size. Before the flood, the unmanaged cross-sections hosted 2.3 times more benthic invertebrate taxa than the channelized ones, whereas after the flood, the number of taxa they supported was so reduced that the taxonomic richness of benthic invertebrate assemblages in both cross-section types became similar. In comparison to pre-flood conditions, the abundance of fish juveniles (YOY) in unmanaged cross-sections was reduced nearly by half; before the flood they hosted 5 times more juvenile individuals than channelized cross-sections and only twice as many after the flood. Finally, a differing assessment of flood impact on the ecological river quality was obtained with the invertebrate-based BMWP-PL index and the European Fish Index, with the former indicating a significant reduction of the quality in unmanaged cross-sections and the latter pointing to no such change. The results indicate that assessments performed before or after a major flood may yield significantly different results for the quality of abiotic and biotic elements of the river ecosystem. Final assessment should thus be based on repeated surveys to balance the effect of extreme hydrological events.

6.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 25(24): 23468-23484, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27392629

ABSTRACT

River quality trajectories are presented for (i) organic pollution, (ii) eutrophication, (iii) nitrate pollution, and (iv) metal contamination over the Longue Durée (130 to 70 years). They are defined by a quantified state indicator (S) specific to each issue, compared to drivers (D) or pressures (P) and to social responses (R) that reflect the complex interactions between society and river quality. The Lower Seine River, naturally sensitive to anthropogenic pressures, greatly impacted by Paris urban growth, industrialization, and intensive agriculture, and well documented by the PIREN-Seine 25-year research program, was chosen to illustrate these trajectories. State indicators, dissolved oxygen, algal pigments, nitrate, and heavy metals (Cd, Cr, Hg, Pb, Zn) in sediments have only been monitored by river basin authorities since 1971. Therefore, their past changes have been reconstructed using three approaches: (i) reassessment of historical sources, (ii) pressure-state models that reconstruct past water quality, and (iii) sedimentary archives of past persistent contamination from dated floodplain cores. The indicators were then transformed into river quality status using contemporary water quality criteria throughout these records. Each environmental issue shows specific trajectories because each has its own relationship between the issue evidence and the social response, but all are characterized by very poor quality in the past, largely ignored: the long-term summer hypoxia (<1880-1995), the summer eutrophication peak (1965-2005), the growing nitrate level since the 1950s, recently stabilized but still high, and the extreme metal contamination (>1935-2000) that peaked in the 1960s. The efficiency of social responses has been highly variable but more efficient in the last 15-25 years.


Subject(s)
Rivers/chemistry , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Water Quality , Agriculture , Environmental Monitoring , Eutrophication , Geologic Sediments/analysis , Geologic Sediments/chemistry , Metals, Heavy/analysis , Nitrates/analysis , Paris , Seasons
7.
Sci Total Environ ; 579: 1387-1398, 2017 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27913024

ABSTRACT

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are one of the main sources of pharmaceutical residue in surface water. Epilithic biofilms were collected downstream from 12 WWTPs of various types and capacities to study the impacts of their discharge through the changes in biofilm composition (compared to a corresponding upstream biofilm) in terms of pharmaceutical concentrations and bacterial community modifications (microbial diversity and resistance integrons). The biofilm is a promising indicator to evaluate the impacts of WWTPs on the surrounding aquatic environment. Indeed, the use of biofilms reveals contamination hot spots. All of the downstream biofilms present significant concentrations (up to 965ng/g) of five to 11 pharmaceuticals (among the 12 analysed). Moreover, the exposition to the discharge point increases the presence of resistance integrons (three to 31 fold for Class 1) and modifies the diversity of the bacterial communities (for example cyanobacteria). The present study confirms that the discharge from WWTPs has an impact on the aquatic environment.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Microbial/genetics , Environmental Monitoring , Waste Disposal, Fluid/statistics & numerical data , Wastewater/chemistry , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Biofilms/drug effects , Rivers/chemistry , Rivers/microbiology , Wastewater/microbiology , Water Microbiology , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity
8.
Water Res ; 79: 158-72, 2015 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25989325

ABSTRACT

River quality analysis is an important activity which, in Serbia, has been performed using the Serbian Water Quality Index (SWQI). This is a measure based on a weighted aggregation of 10 water quality parameters. In this work, alternative methods drawing on visualisation approaches used in multi-criterion decision analysis are applied to the problem of evaluating river quality in the Danube. Two methods are considered: one which constructs a graph using the dominance relation combined with a further multi-criterion ranking method, average rank, and the other in which the dimensionality of the data is reduced using PCA for visualisation. Results for data collected in 2010 are analysed and compared with the corresponding SWQI values for the river in that year, and we find that by employing these methods it is possible to reveal more information within the data than is possible by using SWQI alone.


Subject(s)
Environmental Monitoring/methods , Rivers/chemistry , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Water Quality/standards , Decision Support Techniques , Principal Component Analysis , Serbia , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL