[Samii: a robotic mediation application to improve geriatric care]. / Samii : une application de médiation robotique pour améliorer les soins gériatriques.

The emergence of social robots in gerontology has introduced new playful and reassuring media into nursing homes and geriatric wards. Despite promising results, their complexity hinders their widespread adoption. The Intelligent Interactive Care System aims to remedy these limitations by offering interactive therapeutic workshops. This study evaluates residents' involvement in these workshops within an adapted activity and care center, revealing a high level of involvement and satisfaction.

Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in fit older patients compared to a standard population: Clinical characteristics, surgical, oncological and functional outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: To compare robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in well-selected older patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, compared to a younger population. Primary endpoint was perioperative outcomes comparison and secondary endpoint were oncological and functional outcomes comparison to a younger population. METHODS: Single tertiary center cohort of consecutive patients treated with RARP (2017-2020) with retrospective analysis. Patients were classified by age in two groups: <75: control group (CG) and ≥75: study group (SG). Patients aged ≥75 had a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and only patients classified Balducci ≤2 were admitted to surgery. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-nine patients were included, 56 in SG and 213 in CG. Median follow-up was 9.8 months. Univariate analysis showed no statistically significant (SS) difference between the groups for patients' characteristics (PSA, digital rectal examination -DRE- and biopsy Gleason Score), perioperative data (operative time, hospitalization length, transfusions rate, immediate complications, Clavien-Dindo complications, 30-days re-interventions and 30-days re-hospitalisation), oncological (TNM, margins, extraprostatic extension, postoperative PSA, BCR, metastases, overall survival -OS- and cancer specific survival -CSS-) and functional outcomes. Median perioperative blood loss was lower in the SG: 200.00 cc IQR [100.00, 300.00] vs 200.00cc IQR [100.00, 400.00] in the CG (P<0.05). A multivariate regression considering age>75, DRE, GS, PSA, cardiovascular history and diabetes showed none of variables associated with early BCR. Limitations are retrospective design, small number of patients and short follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: RARP shows similar perioperative, oncologic and functional outcomes for older patients selected by a CGA when compared to younger patients. The SG shows a minor perioperative bleeding. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Posterior transperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in the treatment of renal tumors: Feasibility of a hybrid approach.

PURPOSE: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for posterior renal tumors may be performed through anterior (transperitoneal) or posterior (retroperitoneal) approach depending on surgeon's expertise. We propose herein a surgical artifice using daVinci Xi system to combine advantages of both approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From November 2019 to November 2020, patients with posterior renal mass, candidate for RAPN were prospectively included after informed consent. After positioning patient in lateral position, daVinci Xi system was docked on tumor side, to initiate transperitoneal procedure. Posterolateral dissection of perinephric space along fascia retrorenalis was conducted until psoas major muscle was exposed. Three additional robotic ports were then inserted in lumbar space, and RAPN was resumed after rotating daVinci Xi boom. Demographics, tumor characteristics, perioperative outcomes, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and follow-up data were analyzed. RESULTS: Ten consecutive patients underwent RAPN with the modified technique. All cases were performed robotically, without modification of port placement. Median (range) tumor diameter was 37 (21-48mm) with median RENAL score of 8 (4-10) Median operative time and warm ischemia time were respectively 128min (70-180min) and 19min (14-22). One patient had a Clavien-Dindo grade II complication. At median follow-up of 13 months (6-18), all patients had eGFR comparable to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: We report the feasibility and safety of a new hybrid posterior transperitoneal approach for RAPN using daVinci Xi system. Limitations include the absence of RENAL score>10 and pT2 tumors. Greater experience is needed to assess learning curve for surgeons untrained to robotic lomboscopy.

[Medico-economic evaluation of the impact of measures to adapt to the switch to surgery robot-assisted in urology]. / Évaluation médico-economique de l'impact de mesures d'adaptation au virage de la chirurgie robot-assistée en urologie.

INTRODUCTION: The development of robot-assisted urological surgery is held back by the lack of robust medico-economic analyses and their heterogeneity. We conducted a medico-economic study to evaluate the implementation of measures to optimize the transition to robotic surgery. METHOD: We carried out a single-center, controlled study from the point of view of the public healthcare establishment for 4 years. Economic data collection was based on a micro-costing method and revenues from stay-related groups. Clinical data corresponded to mean lengths of stay, operating duration, complications and stays in intensive care. The measures to optimize the transition to robotic, implemented mid-study period, enabled before/after comparison. RESULTS: Altogether, 668 patients undergoing robotic surgery were included. Robotic activity increased significantly from periods 1 to 2 to 256% (P=<0.001) as did the overall proportion of robotic by 45% to 85% (P=<0.001). The mean lengths of stay fell significantly, 6.8 d vs. 5.1 d (P<0.001). Costs and revenues increased significantly, resulting in a persistent deficit for the activity €226K vs. €382K (P=<0.001). With increased volume of activity, the deficit per operation and the cost per minute of robotic operating room fell significantly, €3,284 vs. €1,474/procedure (P=<0.001) and €27 vs €24/min (P=<0.029), tending towards a break-even point (=zero deficit) at 430 operations per year. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted surgery can be significantly optimized by implementing measures for the robotic turn to reach a break-even point at 430 operations per year. A better multidisciplinary case mix could lower the break-even volume of activity in short term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Urethro-vesical anastomosis reconstruction using extra-peritoneal robot-assisted laparoscopy for anastomotic stenosis after radical prostatectomy]. / Réfection d'anastomose urétro-vésicale par voie extra-péritonéale laparoscopique robot-assistée pour sténose anastomotique post-prostatectomie radicale.

INTRODUCTION: Urethro-vesical anastomosis stenosis following radical prostatectomy is a rare complication but represents a challenging situation. While the first-line treatment is endoscopic, recurrences after urethrotomies require a radical approach. We present the updated results of our patient's cohort treated by pure robotic anastomosis refection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center study focusing on one surgeon's experience. Patients presented an urethro-vesical stricture following a radical prostatectomy. Each patient received at least one endoscopic treatment. The procedure consisted of a circumferential resection of the stenosis, followed by a re-anastomosis with well-vascularized tissue. We reviewed the outcomes in terms of symptomatic recurrences and continence after the reconstructive surgery. RESULTS: From April 2013 to May 2020, 8 patients underwent this procedure. Half of the patients had previously been treated with salvage radio-hormonotherapy. The median age was 70 years (64-76). The mean operative time was 109minutes (60-180) and blood loss was 120cc (50-250). One patient had an early postoperative complication, with vesico-pubic fistula. The average length of stay was 4.6 days (3-8). Mean follow-up was 24.25 months (1-66). Half of the patients experienced a recurrence at a median time of 8.25 months (6-11) after surgery. Five patients experienced incontinence of which 3 required an artificial urinary sphincter implantation. CONCLUSION: Extra-peritoneal robot-assisted urethro-vesical reconstruction is feasible and safe to manage bladder neck stricture after radical prostatectomy. The risk of postoperative incontinence is high, justifying preoperative information. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

No ischemia technique, parenchymal preservation and age are the most important determinants of renal function after partial nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare the outcomes of Off-Clamp to On -Clamp approach during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). MATERIEL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 940 patients who underwent a RAPN between 2007 and 2015 for cT1a tumors using On-Clamp or Off-Clamp approaches. Patient with solitary kidney or multifocal were excluded. Overall, 103 patients underwent Off-Clamp approach and 37 patients On-Clamp approach. We matched the patients in terms of tumor size, Charlson comorbidity index and R.E.N.A.L. score. At all, 309 patients from the On-Clamp were matched to the Off-Clamp group. We compared the clinic-pathological characteristics, perioperative morbidity and late functional outcomes between the 2 propensity score matched groups. Limitation included retrospective analysis. RESULTS: After matching, there were no difference in clinic-pathological characteristics in terms of gender, age, race, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR), tumor size, R.E.N.A.L. score complexity, hilar (H) location between the 2 groups. Regarding perioperative outcomes; while operative time (P=0,4), estimated blood loss (P=0,28), Clavien grade III-IV complications (P=0,8) surgical reoperation (P=1), 30-day readmission (P=1), positive surgical margin (5,5% vs. 5,8%, P=0,9) were comparable between the 2 groups, there were significant difference in excisional volume loss (median, 7,08 vs. 3,51cm3, P<0,01), e-GFR decline (median, -9,7 vs. -2,2ml/min/1,73 m2, P<0,01), percent of e-GFR preservation (median, 87% vs. 97%, P<0,01), and CKD upstaging (36,5% vs. 23,3%, P=0,01), Off-Clamp approach (P=0,01), and age (P=0,02) were predictors of renal function preservation, whereas excisional volume loss (OR=1,035, CI 95% (1,015-1,06), P<0,01) predicted upstaging. CONCLUSION: RAPN for selected renal mass using Off-Clamp approach offered renal functional advantage over On-Clamp, without adding morbidities. While no ischemia technique was associated with less excisional volume loss, Off-Clamp approach, and age were independent predictors of renal function preservation. Clinical significance of these findings in various clinical settings will require further investigation.

[Experience of day case robotic prostatectomy. About thirty-two patients]. / Expérience de la prostatectomie totale robot-assistée ambulatoire. À propos de 32 cas.

OBJECTIVE: To report a monocentric experience of outpatient management of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using a rapid recovery protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, thirty-two patients underwent a prostatectomy by the same surgeon between February 2017 and September 2018 as part of an outpatient hospitalization. The surgery was a transperitoneal robot-assisted prostatectomy with a urinary catheter duration of 7 days. A satisfaction questionnaire on outpatient care and functional results was sent to all patient during follow-up. RESULTS: Of the thirty-two patients initially planned for ambulatory care, two patients remained hospitalized overnight: the first at the request of his wife, the second because of severe nausea. Of the thirty ambulatory patients, nine (30%) required emergency attention in the days following their discharge, including one with Clavien complication IV. Seven patients would have preferred to be hospitalized one night, but twenty-six patients would recommend ambulatory care to one of their relatives, should they undergo prostatectomy. Oncological findings and functional are comparable to conventional hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Radical prostatectomy can be performed routinely in an outpatient setting with no increase in morbidity or decrease in functional and oncological results, with a high patient-family satisfaction rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[The nurse's role in urologic robotic surgery]. / Le rôle de l'IBODE en chirurgie robotique urologique.

INTRODUCTION: Growing robotic surgery requires new skills for OR professionals. In the heart of the robotic surgery team, the Operating Room nurse has a preponderant role whether circulating, scrub nurse or surgical assistant. How does the OR robotic nurse train? Beyond the technique, what does robotic imply in the OR? METHOD: Analysis of the literature with the terms "scrub nurse" and "robotic surgery" in the PUBMED search engine, and exchanges with OR nurses involved in robotic surgery. RESULTS: The definition of the different OR nurses' roles in robotic surgery shows specific skills to acquire. OR nurses' training is heterogeneous. Communication in the OR is a major stake in robotic surgery. CONCLUSION: Mastery of the robotic tool is essential and the expertise of the OR nurses must be sought to ensure a safe care of patients. Communication appears to be one of the major issues. OR staff training should be standardized, such as regular practice. OR nurses' work is evolving with technique.

[Robotic-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: Study in donors and recipients from 155 cases]. / Néphrectomie laparoscopique assistée par robot dans le cadre du donneur-vivant : étude chez les donneurs et les receveurs à partir de 155 cas.

AIM: To evaluate morbidity and renal function of the donor and recipient during a robotic-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: It is a retrospective study of 155 consecutive patients by robot-assisted laparoscopy in the living donor. Mean operating time, warm ischemia time, blood loss, complications according to the Clavien classification and evolution of creatinine clearance were analyzed in the donors. Recovery of graft function, complications and changes in creatinine clearance were observed in recipients. RESULTS: The mean operating time was 176 (±23) minutes. The mean warm ischemia time was 4.8 (±0.6) minutes. Twenty seven complications were noted. The loss of renal function was 19% at 5 years in donors. Renal recovery was immediate for 153 recipients. Two were delayed due to sepsis. Two patients lost their graft at 15 and 18 months. Seventeen complications have been identified. The mean kidney function of the recipients is measured at 63ml/min at 5 years. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy procedure appears to provide the donor with low morbidity and a moderate decrease in creatinine clearance at 19% at 5 years. Morbidity is also low in recipients with very satisfactory 5-year mean renal function. The technique should promote donation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

The ongoing emergence of robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery.

Robot-assisted surgery is more and more widely used in urology, general surgery and gynecological surgery. The interest of robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery, a discipline that operates primarily on surfaces, has yet to be conclusively proved. However, the initial applications of robotic surgery in plastic and reconstructive surgery have been emerging in a number of fields including transoral reconstruction of posterior oropharyngeal defects, nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction, microsurgery, muscle harvesting for pelvic reconstruction and coverage of the scalp or the extremities.

Robot-assisted renal transplantation using the retroperitoneal approach (RART) with more than one year follow up: Description of the technique and results.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the technique and report our first experience of robotic-assisted renal transplantation (RART) with more than one year follow up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In our center the first case of RART was realized in October 2013 with a cadaveric graft. We used the combined extra- and intraperitoneal robot assisted laparoscopic route with extraperitoneal positioning of the graft and intraperitoneal transplantation. The patient was placed in the supine position with arms along the body; the robot came from the right inferior part of the patient. Access to the retroperitoneal space was obtained using an Alexis trocar that permitted the insertion of the kidney with ice without losing the pneumoperitoneum. Ports included a 12-mm camera port (placed under the ombilicus), two 8-mm robotic ports (placed 6cms laterally from the previous port) and a 12-mm assistant port (placed between the upper port and the ombilic). All the pre-, per- and postoperative data were prospectively included in a database. We report the results of the initial experience of RART, performed with more than one year follow-up. RESULTS: This technique is the first described using the retroperitoneal approach that is the routine approach for conventional open renal transplantation. This approach permitted to perform excellent arterial, veinous and ureteral anastomosis. Eight cases of RART were conducted between October 2013 and November 2015 (five men and three women). The average age was 58 years (range 39-75years). The average body mass index was 28 (range 22-38). Five patients had history of abdominal surgery and were dialyzed for 30 months on average (range 3-63months). Three left and five right cadavers kidneys were transplanted in the right iliac fossa. The mean graft size was 109mm (range 90-130). The mean length of the incision for insertion of the graft was 60 mms (40-100mms). Mean warm ischemia time was 63minutes (range 46-84). The total operative time was 200minutes (149-245). No patient was transfused during surgery and two were transfused postoperatively. Median length of hospital stay was 14 days (range 10-30 days). Only one patient needed postoperative morphine, the pain visual analogic scale 12hours postoperatively was 2 (0-5). Mean serum creatinine at seven days, at three months and at one year was 400 (98-639micromol/L), 151 (80-235micromol/L) and 129 (86-194micromol/L) respectively. At one year follow-up, no patient had a wound infection or incisional hernia. One patient was re-operated for ureteral anastomosis stricture. CONCLUSION: The retroperitoneal approach for RART permits the kidney to be cooled and a direct access to the iliac vessels and bladder. This initial series with more than a year of post-monitoring RART shows promising results despite some initial technical difficulties. The procedure can still be improved and hoped to see an improvement in the results. A comparison to the results of the conventional route is necessary before diffusing the robot-assisted technique. LEVEL OF PROOF: 3.

Exploring positive surgical margins after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Does body habitus really make a difference ?

BACKGROUND: Positive surgical margins (PSMs) at radical prostatectomy (RP) are generally recognized as a surrogate of poor or difficult dissection of the prostatic gland. In open RP cohorts, obesity seems to be associated to an increased risk of PSMs, probably due to the technical challenge that obese men pose to surgical access. Minimally invasive RP has been claimed to possibly reduce PSM rate. Aim of the study was to explore the impact of obesity and body habitus on PSM risk and their localisation during laparoscopic and robotic-assisted RP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 539 prospectively enrolled patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic-assisted RP with pT2 prostate cancer. The outcome measured was rate of PSM according to the BMI and surgical approach (laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted). Patients were categorized in BMI<25kg/m2, BMI 25-29.9kg/m2 and BMI >30kg/m2 groups respectively and compared using Kruskall-Wallis or χ2 test, as appropriate. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to assess the impact of BMI and surgical technique on PSM risk. RESULTS: Overall, 127 (24%) of men had PSMs detected at final specimen evaluation. Mean PSM length was 3.9±3.4mm, and 30 (6%) men presented significant margins ≥4mm. Analysing the rate of PSMs across BMI categories, no significant association between increased BMI and PSM was detected (all P>0.48). On uni- and multivariate logistic regression BMI was not a statistically significant risk factor for PSM (P=0.14), nor was the minimally invasive technique (laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted) (P=0.54). CONCLUSIONS: In this study obese men do not appear to have a significant increase in risk of PSMs at RP compared to lean and overweight men when operated by a minimally invasive approach. The magnified vision and increased access to the pelvis allowed by a laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approach may be accountable for our findings. Larger studies are needed to validate our results. LEVEL OF PROOF: 4.

[The thin ALT perforator flap for oropharyngeal robotic-assisted reconstruction]. / Le lambeau libre perforant antérolatéral de cuisse fin dans les reconstructions oropharyngées robot-assistées.

Since a few years, the transoral robotic surgery reduced the morbidity of oropharyngeal tumors excision. Large posterior tumors can now be removed without any scar visible on the face. In this context and to respect the thinness required for reconstructions at the junction of the upper aerodigestive tract, the free radial forearm flap still remains the solution of choice. However, if the transoral robotic surgery respects the anatomy and the aesthetics of patients at the visible and social area that represents the face, the forearm flap provides visible scars on the other region of social interaction that represents the upper limb. The aim of our work was to prove the feasibility and the benefits in terms of reducing sequelae when using a thin anterolateral perforator flap harvested above the plane of the superficial fascia. We present this new original method in detail and the advantages it offers to patients after surgery.

[Interest of surgical companionship during the training period of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy]. / Intérêt du compagnonnage chirurgical durant la période d'apprentissage de la prostatectomie radicale robot-assistée.

OBJECTIVE: Study of the learning curve of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, evaluating intraoperative difficulties and postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of our first 157 consecutive patients treated with robot-assisted prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer between September 2011 and December 2014. Comparison of learning for each group of 50 procedures and then comparison between patients operated on by a pair of two seniors specially trained for robotic surgery and patients operated on by one mixed pair including a surgeon junior coached by one senior of the first group. RESULTS: Only postoperative complications decreased significantly from the 51st patient (P=0.04). The curves showing the evolution of the operative time decreased with a parallel trend between the two pairs, but with more variability in the mixed pair. There was no significant difference in terms of intraoperative difficulties (P=0.59), nor postoperative complications (P=0.56) mainly of grade 2. The blood loss, transfusion rate, duration of hospitalization and readmission rates did not differ. Lymph node dissection did not affect outcomes. For oncological results, the overall rate of positive surgical margins (R+) was 30.6 % in the initial pair against 24.2 % in the mixed group with no significant difference. Nevertheless, the subpopulation study objectified a R+ rate of 12.86 % for pT2 against 42.85 % for pT3. CONCLUSION: The early involvement of a junior surgeon who did not receive specific training, but benefiting from the guidance of a senior surgeon, did not compromise the results while allowing a faster learning curve with a rate of operative complications close to the one observed by the senior pair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Surgical approach and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy]. / Voie d'abord chirurgicale et fonction sexuelle post-prostatectomie totale.

BACKGROUND: Radical prostatectomy is curative surgical treatment of choice for localized prostate cancer. The objectives are cancer control, preservation of continence and preservation of sexuality, the combination of the three constituting the Trifecta. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess, through the analysis of the literature, the sexual outcomes according to surgical approach: radical prostatectomy by laparotomy (PRL), laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (PRLa) and laparoscopic robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (PRLaRA), when nerve sparing was practiced. METHODS: An exhaustive and retrospective review of literature was conducted using the Pubmed search with the following keywords: "Prostatic Neoplasms" [Mesh], "Prostatectomy" [Mesh], "Erectile Dysfunction" [Mesh], "Robotics" [Mesh], "Laparoscopy" [Mesh], Nerve sparing. SELECTION CRITERIA: The selected articles were prospective or retrospective series including more than 200 patients, randomized trials and meta-analyses published between 1990 and 2014. RESULTS: A total of 21 prospective studies (6 on PRL, 4 on PRLa and 11 on PRLaRA), 12 retrospective studies (6 on PRL, 1 on PRLa and 5 on PRLaRA), 2 randomized controlled trial and 3 meta-analyses were selected from 1992 to 2013. There was no evidence of the superiority of one surgical approach compared to others in terms of sexuality. LIMITS: Articles with level 1 of scientific evidence have discordant results, due to heterogeneity in the assessment criteria of postoperative sexual function. CONCLUSION: According to our knowledge, there is currently no difference in terms of sexual outcomes between PRL, PRLA and PRLaRA approaches.

[Robot assisted radical prostatectomy: What are the evidences at the time of a specific funding?] / Prostatectomie radicale laparoscopique robot-assistée : quelles sont les preuves à l'heure d'une demande de nomenclature spécifique ?

INTRODUCTION: Despite a decreasing number of radical prostatectomies in France, the number of robot-assisted surgeries increases. The objective of this work is to assess the interest of robotic prostatectomy before asking a specific funding from health authorities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature on PubMed was performed. Prospective studies and meta-analyses comparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), laparoscopic (LRP) and open surgery (OP) were selected. RESULTS: There are only two randomized clinical trials comparing RARP and LRP. Erectile function was significantly better after RARP than after LRP. Compared to OP, sexuality evaluation, based on meta-analyses, was significantly better at 12 months and the absolute risk of erectile dysfunction significantly decreased. Continence after RARP was significantly better than LRP 3 months after surgery. Compared to OP, continence results were discordant, sometimes significantly in favor of RARP, sometimes similar. The rate of positive margins was similar whatever the technique. The long-term oncological outcomes were similar. In terms of perioperative complications, no significant difference was observed between RARP and LRP or OP. CONCLUSION: RARP provides same oncological outcomes as the open and laparoscopic approach. Continence and sexuality are better after RARP than after laparoscopic or open surgery. However, no randomized study comparing RARP and OP is available.

[Half-day case robotic radical prostatectomy. Surgery of the future? A case report]. / La prostatectomie radicale robotique ambulatoire. Une chirurgie de l'avenir ? À propos d'un cas.

INTRODUCTION: Robotics and ambulatory are modern applications of surgery. This case study proves the feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy as an outpatient procedure. METHOD: This report highlights the first, half-day, robotic prostatectomy performed on a 57-year-old man with localized prostate cancer. This operation was proposed to the subject because of his excellent physical condition and favorable environmental factors. He chose to undergo the surgery voluntarily. He underwent a nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. Target-controlled infusion propofol was used in perioperative sedation and analgesia. Postoperative evaluation criteria was made with the Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI), Chung score and a patient satisfaction survey. RESULTS: No perioperative or postoperative complications were reported. Blood loss was low (75 mL). The patient stayed less than 12 hours in the ambulatory unit thanks to a rapid recovery. The patient returned home after reporting a Chung score of 10. No hospital readmission was necessary. Functional results were: a bowel movement on day 1, back to work on day 2, normal urinary continence on day 8, a correct erectile function on day 9. Oncological results revealed negative surgical margins for cancer and PSA postoperative<0.03 ng/mL. CONCLUSION: Ambulatory robotic radical prostatectomies can be performed on voluntarily-selected patients without affecting the high quality of urological surgery outcomes.

[Robotics and improvement of the quality of geriatric care]. / Robotique et amélioration de la qualité des soins en gériatrie.

New technologies offer innovations to improve the care of the elderly with Alzheimer's or and other forms of dementia. Robots, endowed with features such as monitoring of physiological parameters, cognitive training or occupational therapy, have appeared. They are not, however, intended to replace humans. Still underutilized, these robots are in development, much like the digital literacy of the elderly.

[RALP: comparison of the oncological and functional outcomes of the intrafascial and the interfascial approaches]. / Résultats carcinologiques et fonctionnels de l'abord interfascial de la prostatectomie robotique comparé avec l'abord intrafascial.

INTRODUCTION: Due to its technical ease and greater precision Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic radical Prostatectomy (RALP) allows a better preservation of the neurovascular bundles, thereby improving functional outcomes. The intrafascial dissection has been proposed to allow a more complete preservation of these bundles. However, this technique harbors a high rate of positive surgical margins, justifying another trend: the interfascial approach. To date, there are still few publications directly comparing these 2 techniques and our study is the first to offer a 2-year follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study focused on a two-hundred patients population divided into two consecutive groups. All the patients were continent preoperatively and had a satisfactory IIEF5 score: (1) Group 1 consisted of 100 patients who underwent RALP with the intrafascial approach. They had a mean age of 60.3 years (45-70). The majority of cancers were of the low or moderate risk group of d'Amico. The mean PSA was 7.43ng/ml. Seventy-five patients had a pT2, 24 a pT3 and one patient had a pT4. (2) Group 2 included 100 patients who underwent RALP with the interfascial technique. Patients had a mean age of 61.6±5.96 years (45-72), and their cancers were mostly of the low or moderate risk groups of d'Amico. The mean PSA was 6.3ng/ml. Seventy-four patients had a pT2, 22 a pT3a, and 4 had a pT3b. All patients were evaluated after one and two years of follow-up. RESULT: Rates of positive surgical margins were 45% and 19% respectively for groups 1 and 2 (P<0.0001). The rates of biochemical failure (PSA>0.2ng/ml) at 2 years were 10% and 3%, respectively for groups 1 and 2 (P=0.0447). At 2 years, 2 patients in group 1 and one patient in group 2 were using 2 or more urinary pads. Erection with or without oral medication was maintained in 65 (65%) and 31 (31%) patients respectively for groups 1 and 2 at one year. At 2 years 86 and 65 patients were having spontaneous erection, respectively in groups 1 and 2 (P=0.0006). In addition, 65 and 55 patients were also capable of sexual penetration, respectively in groups 1 and 2 (P=0.0045). CONCLUSION: The intrafascial approach exposed to a very high rate of positive surgical margins while offering only a little benefit in the erectile function preservation at 2 years compared to the interfascial variant. In our series, we did not notice any significant difference between the two techniques concerning the urinary continence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

[The role of simulation in the curriculum of French urologists-in-training: a study by the French Association of Urologists-in-Training (AFUF)]. / Évaluation de l'utilisation de la simulation dans la formation des jeunes urologues français : une enquête de l'association française des urologues en formation (AFUF).

OBJECTIVES: To study the place of simulation in the training curriculum of French urologists-in-training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online questionnaire was sent to all residents and fellows members of the AFUF between February and May, 2013. Results are presented as the median (interquartile range). RESULTS: The answers of 125 urologists-in-training were computed (response rate 38%). They were residents in 90 cases (72%), and fellows in 35 cases (28%). Median age was 29 (27-30), male proportion 77%. All French academic urology departments were represented. Ninety of them (72%) had access to a pelvi-trainer and 66 (53%) to animal or cadaveric models, although they never used them or less than once a month in 83 and 97% of cases, respectively. Seventy-two (58%) had used a virtual-reality based simulator at least once and 38 (30%) had regular access to one, but without supervision in 64% of cases. Factors limiting simulation-based training were the lack of available simulators (70%), the lack of time (58%), the absence of incitement (34%) and supervision (20%). If these conditions were met, 86% of urologists-in-training would be ready to spend more than one hour a-week training on a simulator. CONCLUSION: This study revealed among the sample of respondents a limited use of simulation tools for skills aquisition. This was explained by a limited availability of these tools but also by an insufficient use of the tools when available.