Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Plant J ; 119(3): 1481-1493, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38858852

ABSTRACT

Structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) complexes play roles in cohesion, condensation, replication, transcription, and DNA repair. Their cores are composed of SMC proteins with a unique structure consisting of an ATPase head, long arm, and hinge. SMC complexes form long rod-like structures, which can change to ring-like and elbow-bent conformations upon binding ATP, DNA, and other regulatory factors. These SMC dynamic conformational changes are involved in their loading, translocation, and DNA loop extrusion. Here, we examined the binding and role of the PpNSE5 regulatory factor of Physcomitrium patens PpSMC5/6 complex. We found that the PpNSE5 C-terminal half (aa230-505) is required for binding to its PpNSE6 partner, while the N-terminal half (aa1-230) binds PpSMC subunits. Specifically, the first 71 amino acids of PpNSE5 were required for binding to PpSMC6. Interestingly, the PpNSE5 binding required the PpSMC6 head-proximal joint region and PpSMC5 hinge-proximal arm, suggesting a long distance between binding sites on PpSMC5 and PpSMC6 arms. Therefore, we hypothesize that PpNSE5 either links two antiparallel SMC5/6 complexes or binds one SMC5/6 in elbow-bent conformation, the later model being consistent with the role of NSE5/NSE6 dimer as SMC5/6 loading factor to DNA lesions. In addition, we generated the P. patens Ppnse5KO1 mutant line with an N-terminally truncated version of PpNSE5, which exhibited DNA repair defects while keeping a normal number of rDNA repeats. As the first 71 amino acids of PpNSE5 are required for PpSMC6 binding, our results suggest the role of PpNSE5-PpSMC6 interaction in SMC5/6 loading to DNA lesions.


Subject(s)
Bryopsida , Plant Proteins , Plant Proteins/metabolism , Plant Proteins/genetics , Bryopsida/genetics , Bryopsida/metabolism , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , Chromosomes, Plant/genetics , Protein Binding
2.
J Biol Chem ; 299(11): 105288, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37748650

ABSTRACT

Rad18 interacts with the SMC5/6 localization factor 1 (SLF1) to recruit the SMC5/6 complex to DNA damage sites for repair. The mechanism of the specific Rad18 recognition by SLF1 is unclear. Here, we present the crystal structure of the tandem BRCT repeat (tBRCT) in SLF1 (SLF1tBRCT) bound with the interacting Rad18 peptide. Our structure and biochemical studies demonstrate that SLF1tBRCT interacts with two phosphoserines and adjacent residues in Rad18 for high-affinity and specificity Rad18 recognition. We found that SLF1tBRCT utilizes mechanisms common among tBRCTs as well as unique ones for Rad18 binding, the latter include interactions with an α-helical structure in Rad18 that has not been observed in other tBRCT-bound ligand proteins. Our work provides structural insights into Rad18 targeting by SLF1 and expands the understanding of BRCT-mediated complex assembly.


Subject(s)
DNA Damage , Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases , Protein Binding , Protein Domains , Peptides , DNA Repair
3.
Plant J ; 115(4): 1084-1099, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37191775

ABSTRACT

Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes are molecular machines ensuring chromatin organization at higher levels. They play direct roles in cohesion, condensation, replication, transcription, and DNA repair. Their cores are composed of long-armed SMC, kleisin, and kleisin-associated subunits. Additional factors, like NSE6 within SMC5/6, bind to SMC core complexes and regulate their activities. In the human HsNSE6/SLF2, we recently identified a new CANIN domain. Here we tracked down its sequence homology to lower plants, selected the bryophyte Physcomitrium patens, and analyzed PpNSE6 protein-protein interactions to explore its conservation in detail. We identified a previously unrecognized core sequence motif conserved from yeasts to humans within the NSE6 CANIN domain. This motif mediates the interaction between NSE6 and its NSE5 partner in yeasts and plants. In addition, the CANIN domain and its preceding PpNSE6 sequences bind both PpSMC5 and PpSMC6 arms. Interestingly, we mapped the PpNSE6-binding site at the PpSMC5 arm right next to the PpNSE2-binding surface. The position of NSE6 at SMC arms suggests its role in the regulation of SMC5/6 dynamics. Consistent with the regulatory role of NSE6 subunits, Ppnse6 mutant lines were viable and sensitive to the DNA-damaging drug bleomycin and lost a large portion of rDNA copies. These moss mutants also exhibited reduced growth and developmental aberrations. Altogether, our data showed the conserved function of the NSE6 subunit and architecture of the SMC5/6 complex across species.


Subject(s)
Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone , DNA Repair , Humans , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , Chromosomes , Protein Domains , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism
4.
Am J Cancer Res ; 11(4): 1522-1539, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33948371

ABSTRACT

Response to oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy varies among patients with stage II and III colon cancer; however, genetic alterations associated with this response remain incompletely characterized. A three-stage analytical framework, including the discovery, validation, and replication stages, was designed to explore genetic alterations modulating response to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in adjuvant setting among patients with stage II and III colon cancer receiving complete resection of tumor. Except for several somatic mutated genes, such as ARSD and ACE, showing less definitive associations with response to oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy, we found stable associations of rs6891545C > A polymorphism in SLF1 gene, a key component of DNA damage response system, with the response across all three stages. Patients with rs6891545 A allele had significantly lower risk of poor responsiveness to oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy at both discovery and validation stages, compared with ones possessing wild homozygous genotype CC (discovery stage: odds ratio, 0; 95% CI, 0-0.48; P = .005; validation stage: odds ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.11-0.99; P = .048). In the replication cohort, rs6891545 A allele was confirmed to be strongly associated with improved DFS (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.81; P = .007). Notably, the improvement persisted after controlling for sex, age, tumor location, differentiation, and stage (hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22-0.80; P = .009). Moreover, in silico analysis unraveled strong impact of rs6891545 A allele on local secondary structure of SLF1 mRNA, possibly leading to low SLF1 protein expression. We conclude that the rs6891545C > A polymorphism may serve as an independent marker of response to oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II and III colon cancer, with improved clinical benefit observed in patients with the A allele possibly attributable to low expression of SLF1 protein resulting in deficient DNA repair capacity.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL