Straight intramedullary MultiLoc nails for displaced proximal humeral fractures: health status, radiographic results, clinical outcome, and complications.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of the displaced proximal humerus fractures (PHF) still facing a lot of unsolved problems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effect of MultiLoc nails for the treatment of PHF and present outcomes of patients with different Neer's classification and reduction quality. METHODS: Adult patients with PHFs were recruited and treated with MultiLoc nail. Intraoperative data, radiographic and functional outcomes, as well as occurrence of postoperative complications were assessed. RESULTS: 48 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in this study. The DASH Score were 32.2 ± 3.1 points at 12 months, and 37.3 ± 2.5 points at the final follow-up. The mean ASES score at 12 months and final follow-up were 74.4 ± 6.2 and 78.8 ± 5.1, respectively. The mean CM Score in all 48 patients reached 68 ± 6.4 points at the final follow-up, relative side related CM Score 75.2 ± 7.7% of contralateral extremity. The incidence rate of complications was 20.8%. Patients with fracture mal-union, adhesive capsulitis were observed but no secondary surgeries were performed. There was no significantly difference of DASH Score 12 months after surgery and at the last follow-up among patients with different Neer's classification or reduction quality. However, functional outcomes such as ASES score and CM score were significantly influenced by severity of fracture and the quality of fracture reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that MultiLoc nails is well suited for proximal humeral fractures, with satisfactory health status recovery, good radiographic results, positive clinical outcomes and low rates of complications. The treatment for four part PHF still faces great challenges. Accurate fracture reduction was an important factor for good functional result.

Transitivity, coherence, and reliability of network meta-analyses comparing proximal humerus fracture treatments: a meta-epidemiological study.

BACKGROUND: Network meta-analyses can be valuable for decision-makers in guiding clinical practice. However, for network meta-analysis results to be reliable, the assumptions of both transitivity and coherence must be met, and the methodology should adhere to current best practices. We aimed to assess whether network meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing interventions for proximal humerus fractures provide reliable estimates of intervention effects. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for network meta-analyses comparing interventions for proximal humerus fractures. We critically assessed the methodology regarding the development of a protocol, search strategy, trial inclusion, outcome extraction, and the methods used to conduct the network meta-analyses. We assessed the transitivity and coherence of the network graphs for the Constant score (CS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (DASH), and additional surgery. Transitivity was assessed by comparing probable effect modifiers (age, gender, fracture morphology, and comorbidities) across intervention comparisons. Coherence was assessed using Separating Indirect from Direct Evidence (SIDE) (Separating Indirect from Direct Evidence) and the design-by-treatment interaction test. We used CINeMA (Confidence in Network Meta-analyses) to assess the confidence in the results. RESULTS: None of the three included network meta-analyses had a publicly available protocol or data-analysis plan, and they all had methodological flaws that could threaten the validity of their results. Although we did not detect incoherence for most comparisons, the transitivity assumption was violated for CS, DASH, and additional surgery in all three network meta-analyses. Additionally, the confidence in the results was 'very low' primarily due to within-study bias, reporting bias, intransitivity, imprecision, and heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Current network meta-analyses of RCTs comparing interventions for proximal humerus fractures do not provide reliable estimates of intervention effects. We advise caution in using these network meta-analyses to guide clinical practice. To improve the utility of network meta-analyses to guide clinical practice, journal editors should require that network meta-analyses are done according to a predefined analysis plan in a publicly available protocol and that both coherence and transitivity have been adequately assessed and reported.

Trend, disparities, and projection analysis of public data on shoulder fractures in Sweden: a retrospective analysis of two hundred and sixty two thousand, four hundred and forty four fractures.

PURPOSE: We aimed to identify temporal trends, seasonal changes and regional differences in shoulder fractures in Sweden during 2008-2022. METHODS: Data from the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare were used to assess incidence rates per 100,000 people, categorized by sex, age, and month. RESULTS: Results showed an average of 17,496 fractures annually, with a decline in 2020 followed by a resurgence in 2021-2022. Elderly women, especially those over 65, had higher rates. Winter months exhibited increased incidence. CONCLUSIONS: Projection analysis indicated a gradual decrease in fractures over the next 15 years. Understanding these patterns can inform preventive strategies and resource allocation for shoulder fractures in Sweden.

Traumatic brain injuries are ignored or discriminated in prospective clinical trials on shoulder fractures: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Current literature suggests a significant epidemiological association between traumatic brain injury (TBI) and proximal upper limb fractures in addition to major clinical consequences. A systematic review was conducted to assess how TBI is taken into consideration in interventional studies on shoulder fractures. METHODS: The following data sources were used: MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBM Reviews, CINAHL, and OpenGrey databases. Study selection included interventional randomized clinical trials and prospective cohort studies on shoulder fractures published in English or French between 2008 and 2020. Studies on pathologic fractures, chronic fracture complications, nonhuman subjects, and biomechanics were excluded. Articles were reviewed by two independent authors according to the PRISMA guidelines. Baseline characteristics, exclusion criteria, and input relevant to TBI were recorded. Methodological quality was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized clinical trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. RESULTS: One-hundred-thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. None discussed the possible impact of TBI on their results. Only three (2.7%) studies considered TBI relevant and included these patients in their cohort. Furthermore, 43/113 (38.1%) excluded patients with injuries or mechanisms strongly related to traumatic brain injuries: head injuries (4); moderate and/or severe TBI (7); high energy traumas (3); Polytrauma subjects (33). CONCLUSION: TBI are ignored or discriminated in prospective clinical trials on shoulder fractures. The exclusion of these cases impacts generalizability as their prevalence is significant. Considering the major impact of TBI on important outcomes, its presence should always be assessed to ensure high quality evidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review, Therapeutic Level II.

Segmental Humeral Head Reconstruction in Patients with Chronic Locked Posterior Shoulder Dislocation.

Background and Objectives: The goal of this study was to evaluate the functional outcomes of patient treatment using an allograft after chronic locked posterior shoulder dislocation associated with a bony defect of the upper edge of the humerus that involves 25-50% of the articular surfaces. Materials and Methods: A total of 20 patients were included in this study. Electrocution was the cause of injury in eight patients; in ten patients, the cause was direct trauma; and in two patients, the cause of injury was a fall due to hypoglycemic coma. A standard deltoid pectoral approach was used and a fresh-frozen osteochondral allograft of the femoral condyle was applied. In evaluating the results, Constant's scoring scale was used. Results: The average value of Constant's point scale for the operated shoulder is 84.14 points. This result is good according to the average value of Constant's point scale. Conclusions: Patients with locked chronic posterior dislocation in combination with a bony defect of the humeral head that covers 25-50% of the articular surface, in our opinion, should be treated using bone allografts rather than non-anatomical reconstruction methods.

Proximal humeral fracture-dislocation: Outcome analysis in osteosynthesis and arthroplasties.

PURPOSE: Proximal humeral fracture-dislocations (PHFD) are challenging to treat. In older patients, usually arthroplasty is performed. In younger patients, osteosynthesis is chosen. This study presents functional outcomes of these different treatment modalities. METHODS: All patients operated for PHFD from 2010 until 2017 were included. Osteosynthesis was performed in younger patients and if reconstruction was possible. Either an open deltopectoral approach or a minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) was performed. Hemiarthroplasty (HA) was done if reconstruction of the tubercles was possible, age was below 63 years and no signs of osteoarthritis were present. In all other cases, a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) was done. The primary endpoint was functional outcome assessed with the QuickDASH Score (QDS). Secondary outcomes were subjective shoulder value (SSV), complications, revisions, and conversion into arthroplasty. RESULTS: The mean follow-up of 40 patients was 56 ± 24 months. The mean QDS was 4.5 (0.6-9.1) and the mean SSV was 90 (80-98.6). Of these, 33 patients (mean age: 50) had an osteosynthesis, 25 were treated with MIPO. Only 18% were converted into an arthroplasty after a mean of 22 months. Among them, 7 patients received a primary arthroplasty (mean age: 68), no revisions were recorded. Subgroup analysis showed functional outcome deficits in avascular necrosis (AVN) compared to no AVN (p = 0.021), revision surgery compared to no revision (p = 0.040) and in HA compared to rTSA (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Both osteosynthesis and primary arthroplasty after PHFD can lead to good or even excellent functional outcome. Revision rates in osteosynthesis are high. Revision procedures or secondary conversion into arthroplasty after failed osteosynthesis decrease outcome scores significantly.

Shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture treatment: a retrospective functional outcome analysis.

PURPOSE: Following proximal humeral fractures hemiarthroplasty (HA) or reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) are performed if osteosynthesis or conservative treatment is not possible. HA has been reported to result in decreased functional outcomes compared with rTSA. Secondary shoulder arthroplasty, performed after a different initial treatment, has also been associated with inferior outcomes. METHODS: Patients recieving a shoulder arthroplasty related to a proximal humeral fracture from 2010 to 2019 were included. A retrospective analysis of functional outcomes was performed using QuickDASH and subjective shoulder value (SSV). RESULTS: The mean [standard deviation (SD)] follow-up time among the 82 included patients was 48 (28) months. The mean age was 70 (10) years. The mean age for HA was significantly different from rTSA [57 (9) and 72 (21) years; p < .001]. The mean QuickDASH score for primary arthroplasty was 11 (2) versus 12 (16) for secondary arthroplasty (p = .313). The mean SSV for primary arthroplasty was 84 (22) versus 82 (17) for secondary arthroplasty (p = .578). The mean QuickDASH score for HA was 24 (36) versus 9 (15) for rTSA (p = .346). The mean SSV for HA was 70 (34) versus 86 (17) for rTSA (p = .578). CONCLUSION: Functional outcomes after fracture-related shoulder arthroplasty were excellent in an older population, even when performed secondarily after failed primary osteosynthesis or conservative treatment. No significant differences in shoulder function were identified between rTSA and HA, likely due to restrictive indications for HA.

Core set of unfavorable events of proximal humerus fracture treatment defined by an international Delphi consensus process.

BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus fracture (PHF) complications, whether following surgery or nonoperative management, require standardization of definitions and documentation for consistent reporting. We aimed to define an international consensus core event set (CES) of clinically-relevant unfavorable events of PHF to be documented in clinical routine practice and research. METHODS: A Delphi exercise was implemented with an international panel of experienced shoulder trauma surgeons selected by survey invitation of AO Trauma members. An organized list of PHF events after nonoperative or operative management was developed and reviewed by panel members using on-line surveys. The proposed core set was revised regarding event groups along with definitions, specifications and timing of occurrence. Consensus was reached with at least a two-third agreement. RESULTS: The PHF consensus panel was composed of 231 clinicians worldwide who responded to at least one of two completed surveys. There was 93% final agreement about three intraoperative local event groups (device, osteochondral, soft tissue). Postoperative or nonoperative event terms and definitions organized into eight groups (device, osteochondral, shoulder instability, fracture-related infection, peripheral neurological, vascular, superficial soft tissue, deep soft tissue) were approved with 96 to 98% agreement. The time period for documentation ranged from 30 days to 24 months after PHF treatment depending on the event group and specification. The resulting consensus was presented on a paper-based PHF CES documentation form. CONCLUSIONS: International consensus was achieved on a core set of local unfavorable events of PHF to foster standardization of complication reporting in clinical research and register documentation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

The Use of Acupuncture in the Management of Patients With Humeral Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of acupuncture on humeral fractures. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials were searched systematically from inception to January 2020 using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and 7 Korean databases. Pain scale and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores were the primary and secondary measurements. A risk-of-bias assessment and meta-analysis were conducted. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials were included in the systematic review; the quality of the studies was ambiguous. The meta-analysis showed that acupuncture improved the pain severity score compared with conventional therapies (standard mean difference = -4.55, 95% confidence interval, -7.48 to -1.61, I2 = 98%, P < .00001) but did not improve the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (standard mean difference = 4.99, 95% confidence interval, -0.31 to 10.30, I2 = 99%, P < .00001). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis shows that acupuncture reduced pain after proximal humeral fracture, in addition to common rehabilitative modalities. However, the conclusion of this review should be cautiously applied in clinical practice owing to the low quality of the included studies.

[Arthroscopic fracture treatment of the shoulder joint]. / Arthroskopische Frakturversorgung des Schultergelenks.

In recent years, the understanding of shoulder fractures has changed due to the progress of arthroscopy. In addition to the cosmetic result, the access morbidity, particularly the integrity of the subscapularis muscle in glenoid and scapular fractures, must be mentioned as an advantage of a minimally invasive approach. Furthermore, necessary secondary interventions, e. g. hook plate removal, can be prevented or minimized by modern implants and arthroscopic techniques.However, the available data and publications are almost exclusively limited to technical notes or small case series, so statements about faster recreation or potential reduction of infection risk cannot be made. Whether addressing concomitant injuries has an effect on the clinical and functional outcome is also unclear at the present time.

Axillary nerve lesions after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures through an extended lateral deltoid-split approach: electrophysiological findings.

BACKGROUND: Axillary nerve injuries after shoulder surgery are rare. In most studies, the frequency of injury is usually determined using clinical examinations, but results from intraoperative neuromonitoring studies have revealed higher than expected rates. Few studies have investigated this topic. Our aim was to determine the frequency of axillary nerve lesions after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures by using electrophysiological assessments and to provide a review of the relevant literature. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 76 consecutive patients who received open reduction and internal fixation of a proximal humeral fracture using a locking plate through a deltoid-splitting approach. We performed a clinical and electrophysiological examination at a minimum follow-up time of 12 months. Functional results were assessed according to the Constant-Murley and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores. Electrophysiological examinations comprised electromyography, electroneurography, and motor and somatosensory evoked potentials. The main outcome was the frequency of axillary nerve lesions. RESULTS: Forty patients were monitored for an average of 28 months. The mean raw Constant-Murley score was 61 points, the age- and gender-adjusted score was 71%, and the mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 33 points. Neurapraxia occurred in 1 patient, axonotmesis with incomplete reinnervation occurred in 3, and complete reinnervation occurred in 3. The latter group was classified as having a temporary axillary nerve lesion. CONCLUSIONS: The 10% rate of permanent axillary nerve lesions in our cohort is higher than expected based on the clinical examination. Electrophysiological assessment is therefore more appropriate to detect axillary nerve injuries.

Epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures: a detailed survey of 711 patients in a metropolitan area.

BACKGROUND: Literature lacks data concerning several epidemiologic aspects of proximal humeral fractures (PHFs). METHODS: This retrospective study included 711 consecutive patients (209 men, 502 women) who sustained a PHF in the last 3 years. Participants were divided into 2 groups, adults and children. Data regarding age, sex, date, and fracture side were collected. According to the mechanism of injury, we arbitrarily distinguished 7 subgroups. PHFs were classified according to the head-greater-lesser-shaft (HGLS)-Hertel classification and to the Salter-Harris classification using x-ray and computed tomography imaging. RESULTS: PHFs represent 5.03% of the overall fractures. The right side was involved in 389 patients (54.7%; P = .6). The mean age of male and female patients was 55.4 (standard deviation, 21.9) years and 67.0 (standard deviation, 16.1) years, respectively (P = .0001). Significant differences in the trauma mechanism between female patients (street/home low-energy trauma) and male patients (high-energy trauma) were found. A significant correlation between trauma mechanisms from 1 to 5 and fracture patterns H-G-L-S, HL-G-S, HGL-S, and HLS-G was observed. The occurrence of the same patterns significantly varied according to different age subgroups. Considering the pediatric population, a significant incidence of Salter-Harris 2 in both genders was found. No correlation was observed between the fracture patterns and the trauma mechanism. CONCLUSIONS: PHFs have a higher prevalence and incidence in females and in older age, respectively; they are more frequent in the winter months. In addition, male fractures are due to different traumatic events than those in females. A correlation between trauma and PHF pattern was evident only for adults. Some fracture patterns are correlated with different ranges of age in all patients.

The Shoulder Function Index (SFInX): evaluation of its measurement properties in people recovering from a proximal humeral fracture.

BACKGROUND: Concerns about test administration, reliability estimations, content and internal structure (dimensionality) of available shoulder measures for people with proximal humeral facture led to the development of a new clinician-observed outcome measure: the Shoulder Function Index (SFInX). The SFInX measures shoulder function by judgement of actual ability to perform daily tasks in which the shoulder is involved. Patients and health professionals had input into the instrument development, and Rasch analysis was used to create a unidimensional, interval-level scale. This study comprehensively evaluated the measurement properties of the SFInX in people recovering from a proximal humeral fracture. METHODS: Data were collected on 92 people [79 women, mean age 63.5 years (SD13.9)] who sustained a proximal humeral fracture within the previous year on three occasions to allow for evaluation of the following measurement properties: construct validity (convergent, discriminant and known-groups validity), longitudinal validity (responsiveness), intra-rater reliability (one week retest interval), and inter-rater reliability (n = 20 subgroup; two independent raters). Comparative measures were Constant Score and Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and discriminative measure was a mental status questionnaire. Minimal clinically important difference, floor and ceiling effects and feasibility of the SFInX were also evaluated. A priori hypotheses were formulated where applicable. RESULTS: Results for construct validity testing supported hypothesised relationships (convergent validity r = 0.75-0.89 (Constant Score and DASH); discriminant validity r = -0.08 (mental status); known-groups validity r = 0.50). For longitudinal validity, lower correlations (r = 0.40-0.49) than hypothesised (r = 0.50-0.70) were found. The SFInX scores changed more (10.3 points) than other scales, which could indicate that the SFInX is more responsive than the comparative measures. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability found ICCs of 0.96 (95 % CI 0.94-0.97) and 0.91 (95 % CI 0.63-0.97) respectively, with low measurement error (SEM = 3.9-5.8/100). A change of 11-12 points (out of 100) was indicative of a clinically important difference. CONCLUSIONS: The SFInX is a feasible outcome measure which clinicians can use to reliably measure and detect clinically important changes in the construct of 'shoulder function', the ability to perform activities in which the shoulder is involved, in people recovering from a proximal humeral fracture.

Locking intramedullary nails compared with locking plates for two- and three-part proximal humeral surgical neck fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown good clinical results in patients with proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) treated with locking intramedullary nails or locking plates. Our study compared the clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with 2- and 3-part surgical neck fractures. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, 72 patients with 2- or 3-part surgical neck PHFs were randomly assigned to receive fixation with locking intramedullary nails (nail group) or locking plates (plate group). The primary outcome was the 12-month Constant-Murley score. The secondary outcomes included the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, the visual analog scale pain score, the shoulder passive range of motion, the neck-shaft angle, and complication rates. RESULTS: There was no significant mean treatment group difference in the Constant-Murley score at 12 months (70.3 points for the nail group vs. 71.5 points for the plate group; P = .750) or at individual follow-up assessments. There were no differences in the 3-, 6- and 12-month Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores, visual analog scale scores, and range of motion, except for the medial rotation at 6 months. The neck-shaft angle was equivalent between the groups at 12 months. There were significant differences over 12 months in total complication rates (P = .002) and reoperation rates (P = .041). There were no significant differences for the rotator cuff tear rate (P = .672). CONCLUSION: Fixation of PHFs with locking plates or locking intramedullary nails produces similar clinical and radiologic results. Nevertheless, the complication and reoperation rates were higher in the nail group.

Which parameters affect medium- to long-term results after angular stable plate fixation for proximal humeral fractures?

BACKGROUND: Very little information on medium- to long-term results is available for surgically treated proximal humeral fractures. The aim of this prospective treatment study was to present long-term results after angular stable plate fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures and to detect which specific patient- and fracture-related parameters affect the clinical outcome. METHODS: We performed a prospective clinical and radiologic evaluation of 77 patients with a displaced proximal humeral fracture (28 Neer 2-part, 38 3-part, and 11 4-part fractures; 28 AO A fractures, 30 AO B fractures, and 19 AO C fractures) treated with angular stable plate fixation after a mean follow-up period of 96 months (range, 74-133 months). We assessed outcomes with the Constant, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores and evaluated specific patient- and fracture-related parameters including complications. RESULTS: The mean Constant, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores were 79, 31, and 12 points. Reasons for revisions were implant-related impingement (n = 13), screw perforation (n = 10), infection (n = 4), and secondary fracture displacement (n = 1). There was a significant association between worse score results and occurrence of secondary fracture displacement, screw perforation, residual bone deformities, and a rotator cuff defect at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Good medium- to long-term results after angular stable plate fixation of displaced proximal humeral fracture can be expected. A reconstruction within a range of 15° in both anteroposterior and axillary views and <5-mm tuberosity displacement should be the aim of head-preserving surgery to prevent complications, such as secondary fracture displacement and screw perforation, and a less favorable long-term result.

The Application of Bidirectional Rapid Reductor in Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for the Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Case Series.

OBJECTIVE: Rapid and effective reduction is difficult for minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) surgery. This study aims to introduce a bidirectional rapid reductor (BRR) designed to assist in the reduction during MIPO surgery for proximal humeral fractures (PHFs). METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted between June 2021 and February 2022 in the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, involving patients diagnosed with PHFs. A detailed technical approach of BRR in MIPO surgery was described, and the patients' outcomes based on postoperative radiographic results including x-ray postoperative follow-up, and clinical outcome parameters including visual analogue scale (VAS) and constant-Murley score at last follow-up were reported. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients were included in this study, comprising three males and nine females, with an average age of 67.58 years. The mean operative time was 70.92 min (range 63-80 min). The mean blood loss was 102.27 mL (range 50-300 mL). The mean VAS and constant-Murley scores at final follow-up were 0.33 and 88, respectively. All patients had their fractures healed without secondary displacement at last follow-up. One patient experienced shoulder stiffness post-operation. There were no adverse events or complications following the use of this technique, such as acromion fracture, nerve or blood vessel injury. CONCLUSION: The BRR can assist MIPO for good reduction of PHFs. However, the efficacy should be validated with a large-sample randomized controlled trial and longer follow-up.

Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Dislocation After Trauma with Coracoid Apophysis Fracture - A Rare Association.

Anterior dislocations represent about 96% of total shoulder dislocations, with recurrence/instability being more common in young patients. Injury of other shoulder structures is frequent, namely bony Bankart lesion. However, the association with coracoid apophysis fracture is very rare. The present article describes the clinical case of a 67-year-old man who presented to the emergency department with complaints of persistent omalgia, with acute episodes, beginning after a fall from his own height. The patient also presented history of shoulder trauma 3 months earlier, which was evaluated at another hospital. Shoulder anterior dislocation was observed radiographically, and the computed tomography (CT) confirmed bone erosion of the anteroinferior part of the glenoid (bone loss of about 50% of the anteroposterior diameter in the lower region of the glenoid), with almost complete resorption of the bony Bankart lesion (apparent in later analysis of the radiography of the initial traumatic episode). Connectedly, a transverse fracture of the coracoid apophysis (type II in the Ogawa classification) was diagnosed. The patient was submitted to surgical treatment, with anterior bone stop confection using the remnant of the fractured fragment of the coracoid supplemented by tricortical autologous iliac graft, fixed with cannulated screws (according to the Bristow-Latarjet and Eden-Hybinett techniques). In the postoperative follow-up, a good functional result was observed, with no new episodes of dislocation and no significant pain complaints. A rare association of shoulder lesions is described, and the challenge of their treatment is highlighted, given the late diagnosis, as in the case presented.

Triple Disruption of the Superior Shoulder Suspensory Complex - Review and Surgical Technique.

Introduction: The shoulder girdle is composed of two arches, and these two arches are held together by the superior shoulder suspensory complex (SSSC), a ligamentous complex. Goss's 1993 description of the SSSC as a ring includes the glenoid, coracoid process, coracoclavicular ligaments, distal clavicle, acromioclavicular joint, and acromion. Goss also noted in a 1996 study that a rupture of the SSSC in two places can result in an unstable lesion. This case report presents an unusual association of fractures involving the coracoid process, acromion, and distal clavicle, which has rarely been reported in the literature. Indeed, a triple lesion of the SSSC is very uncommon and the treatment is still debated. Therefore, we propose a surgical technique which we believe to have provide good results. Case Report: A 54-year-old Caucasian male patient presented with Neer I distal third fracture of the clavicle, a displaced fracture of the acromion, and a fracture of the coracoid process following a left shoulder trauma after an epileptic crisis. The patient underwent surgery and has been followed for 1 year with good clinical and functional outcomes. Conclusion: This case report highlights the complexity of lesions of the SSSC and the importance of determining proper surgical technique based on the type of lesion. It demonstrates that surgery combined with active rehabilitation can lead to good functional outcomes for patients with this type of injury. This report will be of interest to clinicians involved in the treatment of this type of lesion and should add a valuable treatment option for the treatment of triple disruption of the SSSC.

Inter-Observer and Intra-Observer Reliability Assessment of the Established Classification Systems for Periprosthetic Shoulder Fractures.

This study evaluated the reliability and comprehensiveness of the Unified classification system (UCPF), Wright & Cofield, Worland and Kirchhoff classifications and related treatment recommendations for periprosthetic shoulder fractures (PPSFx). Two shoulder arthroplasty specialists (experts) and two orthopaedic residents (non-experts) assessed 20 humeral-sided and five scapula-sided cases of PPSFx. We used the unweighted Cohen's Kappa (κ) for measuring the intra-observer reliability and Krippendorff's alpha (α) for measuring the inter-observer reliability. The inter-rater reliabilities for the Wright & Cofield and Worland classifications were substantial for all groups. The expert and non-expert groups for UCPF also showed substantial inter-rater agreement. The all-rater group for the UCPF and the expert and non-expert group for the Kirchhoff classification revealed moderate inter-rater reliability. For the Kirchhoff classification, only fair inter-rater reliability was found for the non-expert group. Almost perfect intra-rater reliability was measured for all groups of the Wright & Cofield classification and the all-rater and expert groups of the UCPF. All groups of the Kirchhoff and Worland classifications and the group of non-experts for the UCPF had substantial intra-rater reliabilities. Regarding treatment recommendations, substantial inter-rater and moderate intra-rater reliabilities were found. Simple classification systems for PPSFx (Wright & Cofield, Worland) show the highest inter- and intra-observer reliability but lack comprehensiveness as they fail to describe scapula-sided fractures. The complex Kirchhoff classification shows limited reliability. The UCPF seems to offer an acceptable combination of comprehensiveness and reliability.

INTRA- AND INTER-OBSERVER AGREEMENT OF PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURES CLASSIFICATIONS IN ADULTS.

Objective: Evaluating intra- and inter-observer agreement of the Neer, AO, and AO/OTA proximal humerus fractures classification systems in adults. Methods: In total, 100 X-rays of patients with proximal humerus fractures were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria established in this study. They were evaluated by four evaluators with different levels of expertise. The evaluation was performed at two distinct moments, with an interval of 21 days between each analysis. Images were randomized for the second evaluation by a researcher who did not participate in the image selection process. A Fleiss Kappa test was performed to evaluate intra- and inter-observer agreement. Results: We observed a substantial agreement with k = 0.669, k = 0.715, and k = 0.780 for the Neer, AO, and AO/OTA classification systems, respectively. Conclusion: In the second evaluation, intra-observer agreement improved. In the first evaluation, we obtained values of k = 0.724, k = 0.490, and k = 0.599 for the evaluation of the Neer, AO, and AO/OTA classifications. In the second evaluation, the values k = 0.759, k = 0.772, and k = 0.858. Therefore, the evaluations went from moderate to substantial for the AO classification and from moderate to practically perfect for the AO/OTA classification. The level of inter-observer agreement was substantial (0.61-0.80), with k = 0.669, k = 0.715, and k = 0.780 for the Neer, AO, and AO/OTA classifications, respectively. Level of Evidence III, Cross-Sectional Observational Study.

Objetivo: Avaliar a concordância intra e interobservadores entre os sistemas de classificação Neer, AO e AO/OTA nas fraturas do úmero proximal de indivíduos adultos. Métodos: Após a aplicação dos critérios de inclusão e exclusão determinados para a realização deste trabalho, foram selecionadas 100 radiografias de pacientes com fratura do úmero proximal. Estas foram submetidas à avaliação de quatro examinadores com níveis diferentes de expertise. A avaliação foi realizada em dois momentos distintos, com intervalo de 21 dias entre cada análise. As imagens foram randomizadas para a segunda avaliação por um pesquisador que não participou da seleção de imagens. Foi aplicado o teste kappa de Fleiss para verificar a concordância intra e interobservador. Resultados: Na primeira avaliação obtivemos valores de k = 0,724, k = 0,490 e k = 0,599, enquanto na segunda avaliação, os valores k = 0,759, k = 0,772 e k = 0,858 para as avaliações de Neer, AO e AO/OTA, respectivamente. Isso indica que a concordância intraobservador melhorou na segunda avaliação. Conclusões: As avaliações passaram de moderada para substancial para a classificação AO e de moderada para praticamente perfeita para o sistema AO/OTA. O nível de concordância interobservadores foram considerados substanciais (0,61-0,80) com k = 0,669, k = 0,715 e k = 0,780 para as classificações de Neer, AO e AO/OTA, respectivamente. Nível de Evidência III, Estudo Transversal Observacional.