Differences in hypersensitivity reactions and gadolinium deposition disease/symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure to gadolinium-based contrast agents: new insights based on global databases VigiBase, FAERS, and IQVIA-MIDAS.

BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) can occur unexpectedly and be life-threatening when gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are used. Gadolinium deposition disease (GDD) and symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure (SAGE) have been controversial for a long time. However, similar studies are currently incomplete or outdated. Therefore, comparing the safety of different GBCAs in terms of HSRs and GDD/SAGE using the latest post-marketing safety data should yield further insights into safely using GBCAs. METHODS: The safety differences between all GBCAs to GDD and the spectrum of GBCA-related HSRs were all compared and analyzed by using the World Health Organization database VigiBase and the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database in this study. A further analysis of SAGE was also conducted using FAERS data. The lower limit of the reporting odds ratio (ROR) 95% confidence interval was used for signal detection. Moreover, the frequency of HSRs was calculated by dividing the number of reports in VigiBase by the total sales volume (measured in millions) from 2008 to 2022 in the IQVIA Multinational Integrated Data Analysis System. All adverse events were standardized using the Medical Dictionary for Drug Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) 26.0. RESULTS: This study shows that all GBCAs have the potential to induce HSRs, with nonionic linear GBCAs exhibiting a comparatively lower signal. According to standardized MedDRA query stratification analysis, gadobutrol had a greater ROR025 for angioedema. The ROR025 of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoteridol is larger for anaphylactic/anaphylactoid shock conditions. Regarding severe cutaneous adverse reactions, only gadoversetamide and gadodiamide showed signals in FAERS and VigiBase. There were also differences in the frequency of HSRs between regions. Regarding GDD, gadoterate meglumine, and gadoteridol had a lower ROR025. An analysis of the 29 preferred terms linked to SAGE indicated that special consideration should be given to the risk of skin induration associated with gadoversetamide, gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadobenate dimeglumine, gadodiamide, and gadoteridol. Additionally, gadodiamide and gadoteridol pose a greater risk of skin tightness compared to other GBCAs. CONCLUSIONS: The risk differences among GBCAs using data from several sources were compared in this study. However, as a hypothesis-generating method, a clear causal relationship would require further research and validation.

Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events associated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibodies: a World Health Organization pharmacovigilance study.

PURPOSE: To analyze cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events (ADRs) after intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; aflibercept, bevacizumab, brolucizumab, and ranibizumab) treatment. SUBJECTS: VigiBase, a World Health Organization (WHO) global safety report database DESIGN: Pharmacovigilance study METHODS: The individual-case-safety reports (ICSR) of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ADRs after intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment were compared with those reported in the full database. From 2004 to 2023, 23,129 ADRs after intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy and 25,015,132 ADRs associated with any drug (full database). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information components (IC) were calculated, and the 95% lower credibility interval endpoint of the information component (IC025) was used for disproportionate Bayesian reporting. Inter-drug comparisons were performed using the ratio of odd ratio (rOR). RESULTS: Compared with the full database, anti-VEGFs were associated with an increased reporting of myocardial infarction (IC025 0.75; ROR: 1.78 [95% CI 1.70-1.86]), angina pectoris (IC025 0.53; ROR: 1.61 [95% CI 1.47-1.77]), arrythemias including atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, ventricular fibrillation, supraventricular tachycardia (all IC025 >0, ROR>1), hypertension (IC025 2.22; ROR: 4.91 [95% CI 4.82-5.01]), and hypertensive crisis (IC025 1.97; ROR: 4.49 [95% CI 4.07-4.97]). Moreover, anti-VEGFs were associated with a higher reporting of cerebrovascular ADRs such as cerebral infarction (IC025 4.34; ROR: 23.19 [95% CI 22.10-24.34]), carotid artery stenosis (IC025 1.85; ROR: 5.24 [95% CI 3.98-6.89]), cerebral hemorrhage (IC025 2.29; ROR: 5.38 [95% CI 5.03-5.76]), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (IC025 1.98; ROR: 4.81 [95% CI 4.14-5.6]). Inter-drug comparison indicated that compared to ranibizumab, patients with aflibercept showed overall under-reporting of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ADRs such as myocardial infarction (rOR 0.55 [95% CI 0.49-0.52]), atrial fibrillation (rOR 0.28 [95% CI 0.23-0.35]), cerebrovascular accident (rOR, 0.15 [95% CI 0.14-0.17]), and cerebral hemorrhage (rOR, 0.51 [95% CI 0.40-0.65]). CONCLUSIONS: In this pharmacovigilance case-noncase study, significantly increased reporting of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ADRs were identified after intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment. While ranibizumab may exhibit superior systemic safety regarding its biological characteristics, it is crucial not to overlook the occurrence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ADRs considering its higher reporting rate than bevacizumab or aflibercept.

Drugs associated with reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: A pharmacovigilance study in vigiBase®.

BACKGROUND: Data on drug-induced reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) are scarce. We aimed to describe RCVS characteristics with drugs previously identified as associated with RCVS and investigate potential signals related to other drugs. METHODS: VigiBase® was queried for all reports of RCVS until 31 May 2023. A descriptive study was performed on reports concerning drug classes known to precipitate RCVS. To identify new drugs, a disproportionality analysis was conducted. RESULTS: In total, 560 reports were included. RCVS occurred in patients aged between 45-64 years (40%) and 18-44 years (35%), mainly in females (72.5%). Drugs were antidepressants (38.4%), triptans (6.4%), nasal decongestants (3.7%) and immunosupressants (8.7%). In 50 cases, antidepressants were in association with drugs known to precipitate RCVS. The median time to onset was 195 days for antidepressants and much shorter (1-10 days) for triptans, nasal decongestants and immunosuppressants. The outcome was favorable in 87% of cases, and fatal in 4.4%. We found a disproportionality signal with 14 drugs: glucocorticoids, bupropion, varenicline, mycophenolic acid, aripiprazole, trazodone, monoclonal antibodies (erenumab, ustekinumab and tocilizumab), leuprorelin and anastrozole. CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirms the role of vasoconstrictors in the onset of RCVS, particularly when used in combination and found potential signals, which may help clinicians envisage an iatrogenic etiology of RCVS.

Investigating the safety profiles of exogenous melatonin and associated adverse events: A pharmacovigilance study using WHO-VigiBase.

Melatonin, a pineal hormone that modulates circadian rhythms, sleep, and neurotransmitters, is widely used to treat sleep disorders. However, there are limited studies on the safety of melatonin. Therefore, we aimed to present the overall patterns of adverse events (AEs) following melatonin administration and identify potential safety signals associated with melatonin. Using VigiBase, a global individual case safety report (ICSRs) database managed by the World Health Organization (WHO), we conducted a retrospective, observational, pharmacovigilance study of melatonin between January 1996 and September 2022. Disproportionality analysis was conducted using two comparator settings: all other drugs and other sleep medications. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to compare the frequencies of AEs reporting between melatonin and each comparator setting. Furthermore, we assessed adverse events of special interests (AESIs) that could potentially be associated with melatonin. Signals were identified when the following criteria were met: cases ≥3, x2 ≥ 4, IC025 ≥ 0, and the lower end of the 95% CI of ROR > 2. These signals were then compared with the AE information on the drug labels provided by regulatory bodies. A total of 35 479 AE reports associated with melatonin were identified, with a higher proportion of reports from females (57.1%) and individuals aged 45-64 years (20.8%). We identified 21 AEs that were commonly detected as safety signals in the disproportionality analyses, including tic, educational problems, disturbance in social behavior, body temperature fluctuation, and growth retardation. In AESI analyses, accidents and injuries (adjusted ROR 2.97; 95% CI, 2.80-3.16), fall (2.24; 2.12-2.37), nightmare (4.90; 4.37-5.49), and abnormal dreams (3.68; 3.19-4.25) were detected as a signal of melatonin when compared to all other drugs, whereas those signals were not detected when compared to other sleep medications. In this pharmacovigilance study, exogenous melatonin showed safety profiles comparable to other sleep medications. However, several unexpected potential safety signals were identified, underscoring the need for further investigation at the population level.

Dabigatran-related serious medication errors: an analysis using data from VigiBase.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the serious medication errors (MEs) on dabigatran, and their related factors, in order to avoid or reduce the occurrence of adverse events. METHODS: Serious MEs related to dabigatran were extracted from the WHO global database of reported potential side effects of medicinal products (VigiBase) by using "Medication errors and other product use errors and issues" High Level Group Term (HLGT) of the international Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Well-documented reports, vigiGrade completeness score ≥ 0.80, or with an informative narrative were analyzed with a focus on the clinical features of the cases. The PCNE Classification for drug-related problems (DRP) was used to classify medication errors in our analysis of cases. RESULTS: Until January 26, 2020, there were 453 cases with serious MEs related to dabigatran in VigiBase, and 113 were well-documented. Among these, 69 patients (61%) were hospitalized or had prolonged hospitalization, 16 (14%) had life-threatening events, and 12 (11%) died. The MEs occurred in the prescription phase in 77 cases, in administration in 35, and at the dispensing stage in one case. The MEs in prescription were related to a drug selection error in 44 cases (24 concerning contraindications and 20 drug interactions) and to dose error in 33 cases (17 with excessive dose; eight with insufficient frequency; four had an incorrect time; in three, the dose was too low; and in one, too frequent). The MEs in administration were medical-staff-related errors in five cases (three with wrong administration route, one administration omission, and one overdose), patient-related errors in 28 (14 insufficient dose or no administration, seven improper drug storage, four wrong administration method, and three over prescribed dose), and other errors in two (without efficacy monitoring). The dispensing error of a wrong drug strength occurred in a pharmacy. The main adverse events in the 113 patients were haemorrhage in 57 cases (50%) and ischemia in 29 cases (26%). CONCLUSION: Based on the analysis of reports in VigiBase, serious MEs related to dabigatran mainly occurred during prescription and administration. Although the incidence of MEs with clinical consequences in the use of dabigatran cannot be determined, attention should be paid to selection of the appropriate dose to a right patient in the prescription, and to patient compliance and storage in drug administration. The patient harm mainly manifested itself as bleeding or ischemia including fatal outcome in rare patients.

Safety of COVID-19 Vaccination During Pregnancy and Lactation: A VigiBase Analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence on the safety of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination during pregnancy and lactation. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the association between COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and lactation and reporting risk of adverse pregnancy or lactation outcomes. METHODS: Using VigiBase, we performed a disproportionality analysis with case/non case design. Cases were defined based on the Standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQs) of "pregnancy and neonatal topics" and non-cases were defined as all other adverse events. We included all reports with COVID-19 vaccines as the suspected cause. Using the full database as the comparators, reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by logistic regression while adjusting for maternal age. Infants' age and sex were additionally adjusted in analyzing the risk of COVID-19 vaccination during lactation. RESULTS: We identified 10,266 and 6,474 reports with the SMQ of "pregnancy and neonatal topics" associated with COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy and lactation, respectively. No significant RORs of adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy were observed; however, "functional lactation disorders" showed significant disproportionality during lactation with adjusted ROR of 1.48 (95% CI, 1.21-1.79). Further analysis that analyzed "functional lactation disorders" at a preferred term level, showed higher ROR in mastitis (2.76 [95% CI, 1.45-5.27]). CONCLUSION: Overall, we did not observe a positive association between COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and risk of reporting adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, we found a significant disproportionate reporting association between COVID-19 vaccination during lactation and "functional lactation disorders", specifically mastitis. Continuous surveillance is warranted to confirm the safety of COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy and lactation.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonists in pregnancy: a disproportionality analysis in VigiBase®.

BACKGROUND: Current evidence on the safety of calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonists (CGRP-A) in pregnancy for the treatment of both episodic and chronic migraine is scarce and does not yet provide definitive information. By querying VigiBase®, the World Health Organization global pharmacovigilance database, this study aimed to detect differences in the reporting frequency between CGRP-A and triptans in relation to pregnancy. METHODS: Disproportionality analyses on de-duplicated safety reports collected in VigiBase® as of 31.05.2023 reporting exposure to CGRP-A in pregnancy with or without pregnancy outcomes. A Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as a measure of disproportionality and the threshold for the detection of a signal of disproportionate reporting was set with a 95% CI lower limit > 1. FINDINGS: Four hundred sixty-seven safety reports reported exposure to CGRP-A in pregnancy, mostly originating from the United States of America (360/467, 77%), more frequently reported by patients (225/467, 48%), who were mainly females (431/467, 92%), and more frequently reported exposure to CGRP-A during pregnancy (400/467, 86%). Compared to triptans, no signals of disproportionate reporting were detected with CGRP-A either for the overall reporting of pregnancy-related safety reports (ROR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78-1.06), for the reporting of pregnancy outcomes (maternal and/or foetal/neonatal, ROR 0.54, 95% CI 0.45-0.66), or for the reporting of foetal/neonatal outcomes (ROR 0.53, 95% CI 0.41-0.68). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that, to date, there are no signals of increased reporting with CGRP-A compared to triptans in relation to pregnancy in VigiBase®. Future pharmacovigilance studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Adverse events following immunization reported with COVID-19 vaccines in Burkina Faso: Analysis of spontaneous reports / Manifestations post-vaccinales indésirables rapportées avec les vaccins anti-COVID-19 au Burkina Faso : analyse des notifications spontanées

The rapid deployment of COVID-19 vaccines to a large proportion of the population requires a focus on safety. However, few studies have assessed the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in Africa. In Burkina Faso, this issue has not yet been addressed. The objective of this study was to contribute to the description of the characteristics of adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) related to COVID-19 vaccines in Burkina Faso. This was a cross-sectional descriptive retrospective study of spontaneous reports of COVID-19 vaccine-related AEFIs recorded in VigiBase® between June 2021 and November 2022 in Burkina Faso. Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) were extracted from VigiBase® using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical level 2 (ATC2) code. The proportion of ICSRs according to the reporter's qualification, the reporting rate, the time taken to submit and record ICSRs, and the completeness score were calculated. A total of 973 ICSRs concerned COVID-19 vaccines and represented 32.6% of all 2,988 reports in VigiBase®. Overall, 82.0% of the reporters were nurses/midwives, 7.8% were physicians, 6.7% were pharmacists, and 3.4% were patients. The median time between the onset of AEFIs and the submission of the report to the Pharmacovigilance Center was 180 days (IQR: 136; 281). The median registration time was 188 days (IQR: 149; 286). The mean ICSR completeness score was 0.8 (standard deviation = 0.1). The overall AEFI reporting rate was 27.8 per 100,000 vaccine doses. The AEFI reporting rates for the ChAdOx1-nCoV-19, JNJ 78436735, Elasomeran, Tozinameran, and HB02 vaccines were 454.2, 17.4, 11.0, 10.2, and 0.4 per 100,000 vaccine doses, respectively. The majority of AEFIs were systemic in nature (90.1%). Headache (21.2%), fever (19.4%), and myalgia (11.0%) were the most frequently reported AEFIs. Eighteen cases (1.8%) of serious AEFIs (9 hospitalizations, 4 life threatening, 3 temporary disabilities, and 2 others unspecified) were reported. The majority of AEFIs reported were systemic in nature and mild. However, there have been reports of serious AEFIs. The overall AEFI reporting rate was low. There is a need to strengthen the monitoring of these vaccines to better organize strategies to optimize the adherence of the population of Burkina Faso.

Le déploiement rapide des vaccins anti COVID-19 sur une grande partie de la population nécessite de mettre l'accent sur la sécurité. Cependant, peu d'études ont évalué la sécurité des vaccins anti COVID-19 en Afrique. Au Burkina Faso, cette question n'a pas encore été abordée. La présente étude avait pour objectif de contribuer à la description des caractéristiques des manifestations post-vaccinales indésirables (MAPI) liées aux vaccins anti COVID-19 au Burkina Faso. Il s'est agi d'une étude transversale rétrospective ayant porté sur les notifications de MAPI liées aux vaccins anti COVID-19 enregistrées dans VigiBase® entre juin 2021 et novembre 2022 au Burkina Faso. Les cas individuels de rapports de sécurité (CIRS) ont été extraits de VigiBase® à l'aide du code Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical niveau 2 (ATC2). La proportion de CIRS selon la qualification du notificateur, le taux de notification, le délai de transmission et d'enregistrement des CIRS et le score d'exhaustivité ont été calculés. Au total 973 CIRS concernaient les vaccins anti COVID-19 et représentaient 32,6 % des 2 988 rapports enregistrés dans VigiBase®. La répartition des notifications en fonction de la qualification du notificateur a montré que 82,0 % étaient des infirmiers/sage femmes, 7,8 % des médecins, 6,7 % des pharmaciens et 3,4 % des patients. Le délai médian entre l'apparition des MAPI et la transmission du rapport au Centre de pharmacovigilance était de 180 jours (IQR : 136 ; 281). Le délai médian d'enregistrement était de 188 jours (IQR : 149 ; 286). Le score d'exhaustivité moyen des CIRS était de 0,8 (écart type = 0,1). Le taux global de notifications des MAPI était de 27,8 pour 100 000 doses de vaccins. Les taux de notification des MAPI pour les vaccins ChAdOx1-nCoV-19, JNJ 78436735, Elasomeran, Tozinameran et HB02 étaient de 454,2 ; 17,4 ; 11,0 ; 10,2 et 0,4 pour 100 000 doses, respectivement. La majorité des MAPI était de manifestation systémique (90,1 %). Les céphalées (21,2 %), la fièvre (19,4 %) et les myalgies (11,0 %) étaient les MAPI les plus fréquemment notifiés. Dix-huit cas (1,8 %) de MAPI graves (9 hospitalisations, 4 mises en jeu du pronostic vital, 3 incapacités temporaires et 2 autres non précisés) ont été rapportés. La majorité des cas notifiés dans le cadre de la surveillance des MAPI était de manifestation systémique et de nature bénigne. Néanmoins, des cas de MAPI graves ont été notifiés. Le taux global de notification des MAPI était faible. Il est nécessaire de renforcer la surveillance de ces vaccins pour mieux organiser les stratégies visant à optimiser l'adhésion de la population burkinabé.

Automation in signal management in pharmacovigilance-an insight.

Drugs are the imperial part of modern society, but along with their therapeutic effects, drugs can also cause adverse effects, which can be mild to morbid. Pharmacovigilance is the process of collection, detection, assessment, monitoring and prevention of adverse drug events in both clinical trials as well as in the post-marketing phase. The recent trends in increasing unknown adverse events, known as signals, have raised the need to develop an ideal system for monitoring and detecting the potential signals timely. The process of signal management comprises of techniques to identify individual case safety reports systematically. Automated signal detection is highly based upon the data mining of the spontaneous reporting system such as reports from health care professional, observational studies, medical literature or from social media. If a signal is not managed properly, it can become an identical risk associated with the drug which can be hazardous for the patient safety and may have fatal outcomes which may impact health care system adversely. Once a signal is detected quantitatively, it can be further processed by the signal management team for the qualitative analysis and further evaluations. The main components of automated signal detection are data extraction, data acquisition, data selection, and data analysis and data evaluation. This system must be developed in the correct format and context, which eventually emphasizes the quality of data collected and leads to the optimal decision-making based upon the scientific evaluation.

Suspected adverse reactions reported for blood, blood components, and blood products in VigiBase.

INTRODUCTION: Since being designated as medicines by World Health Organization (WHO), blood components are subject to pharmacovigilance reporting. Using VigiBase, the WHO global database of individual case safety reports (ICSRs), we characterized reports of adverse reactions for all blood products. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: ICSRs involving blood products as the suspected medicine in VigiBase between 1968 and 2021 were extracted. MedDRA preferred terms and the International Society of Blood Transfusion haemovigilance definitions were used to stratify adverse reactions. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize ICSR demographics. RESULTS: A total of 111,033 ICSRs containing 577,577 suspected adverse reactions with 6152 MedDRA preferred terms were reported for 34 blood products. There were 12,153 (10.9%) reports for blood components, 98,135 (88.4%) reports for plasma-derived medicines, and 745 (0.7%) reports for recombinant products. The majority of reports (21.0% and 19.7%, respectively) were from patients aged 45-64 and over 65 years. The Americas contributed the most ICSRs (49.7%). Top reported suspected adverse reactions were for the following MedDRA preferred terms: headache (3.5%), pyrexia (2.8%), chills (2.8%), dyspnoea (1.8%), and nausea (1.8%). CONCLUSION: VigiBase already has a large number of reports on blood products. When compared to other existing haemovigilance databases, our study found reports from a broader range of countries and reporters. This may provide us with new perspectives, but for VigiBase to reach its full potential in haemovigilance some alterations in what is captured in reports are required.

Drug-induced acute pancreatitis due to medications used for inflammatory bowel disease: A VigiBase pharmacovigilance database study.

BACKGROUND: Nearly all medications used for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have been reported as causes of acute pancreatitis (AP), with the thiopurines being among the most frequently described. However, with the development of newer medications, thiopurine monotherapy has largely been replaced by newer immunosuppressive drugs. There are few data on the association between AP and biologic/small molecule agents. METHODS: VigiBase, the World Health Organization's Global Individual Case Safety Report database, was used to assess the association between AP and common IBD medications. A case/non-case disproportionality analysis was performed and disproportionality signals were reported as a reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 4,223 AP episodes were identified for common IBD medications. Azathioprine (ROR 19.18, 95% CI 18.21-20.20), 6-mercaptopurine (ROR 13.30, 95% CI 11.73-15.07), and 5-aminosalicylic acid (ROR 17.44, 95% CI 16.24-18.72) all had strong associations with AP, while the biologic/small molecule agents showed weaker or no disproportionality. The association with AP was much higher for thiopurines when used for Crohn's disease (ROR 34.61, 95% CI 30.95-38.70) compared to ulcerative colitis (ROR 8.94, 95% CI 7.47-10.71) or rheumatologic conditions (ROR 18.87, 95% CI 14.72-24.19). CONCLUSIONS: We report the largest real-world database study investigating the association between common IBD medications and AP. Among commonly used IBD medications including biologic/small molecule agents, only thiopurines and 5-aminosalicylic acid are strongly associated with AP. The association between thiopurines and AP is much stronger when the drug is used for Crohn's disease compared to ulcerative colitis and rheumatologic conditions.

Safety profile of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide system in pregnancy: Updated analysis in VigiBase®.

BACKGROUND: Safety data on the use of migraine preventive monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) system in pregnancy are limited. METHODS: Updated pharmacovigilance assessment of the safety reports related to pregnancy associated with erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab and eptinezumab, retrieved from VigiBase® as of 31 December 2021. As primary outcome, the whole group of monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP system was considered and sex and age subgroup disproportionality analyses using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) were conducted. RESULTS: 286 safety reports were found: 116 (40.6%) on erenumab, 125 (43.7%) on galcanezumab, 39 (13.6%) on fremanezumab, 6 (2.1%) on eptinezumab. One hundred and forty-nine (52.1%) safety reports reported only drug exposure in relation to pregnancy while 137 (47.9%) also included ≥1 pregnancy outcomes: maternal outcomes (n = 64), spontaneous abortion (n = 63), foetal growth restriction (n = 1), prematurity (n = 8), neonatal outcomes (n = 13), and poor breastfeeding (n = 1). No specific patterns of maternal, foetal and neonatal toxicity were observed. Spontaneous abortion was not disproportionally more frequently reported with erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab and eptinezumab compared with the entire database (ROR 1.1, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.8-1.5), the entire database since 2018 (ROR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.8), and triptans (ROR 1.2, 95% CI 0.8-1.9). CONCLUSIONS: This updated safety analysis on erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab and eptinezumab in pregnancy showed no signals of foeto-maternal toxicity according to VigiBase® safety reports.

Safety of sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular block: A postmarketing study based on the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database.

AIM: Residual neuromuscular blockade is a common complication after general anaesthesia. Sugammadex can reverse the action of aminosteroid neuromuscular blockers. This study aimed to explore sugammadex safety issues in the real world and determine the spectrum of adverse reactions. METHODS: All sugammadex-related adverse events reported in VigiBase between 2010 and 2019 were classified by group queries according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. A disproportionality analysis of data was performed using the information component (IC); positive IC values were deemed significant. RESULTS: Overall, 16 219 410 adverse events were reported and 2032 were associated with sugammadex. The frequent reactions were recurrence of neuromuscular blockade (n = 54, IC 6.74, IC025 6.33), laryngospasm (n = 53, IC 6.05, IC025 5.64), bronchospasm (n = 119, IC 5.63, IC025 5.36) and bradycardia (n = 169, IC 5.13, IC025 4.90). Fatal cases were more likely among patients with cardiac disorders, especially those over 65 years. In addition, the common adverse drug reactions (ADRs) differed between different age groups (P < .01). ADRs were higher in the 0-17 years age group than in other age groups. The onset time of common ADRs was typically within 1 day and 68.9% occurred within half an hour after sugammadex administration. CONCLUSIONS: Anaesthesiologists should carefully monitor the anaesthesia recovery period to correct the ADRs caused by sugammadex and recommend monitoring neuromuscular function throughout the anaesthesia process. Sugammadex should be used carefully in patients with cardiovascular diseases, and electrocardiography and hemodynamic changes should be monitored after medication.

Safety assessment and adverse drug reaction reporting of tea tree oil (Melaleuca aetheroleum).

Tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) essential oil is widely used as an antiseptic. It mainly consists of monoterpenes with terpinen-4-ol as the major constituent. The aim of this study was to review literature on safety data about tea tree oil and to assess its safety by investigating 159 cases of adverse reactions possibly caused by the oil, reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) from December 1987 until September 2021. To extract these data, VigiBase, the WHO global database of individual case safety reports maintained by the Uppsala Monitoring Centre (UMC), was used. All cases were categorized and analysed and 16 serious cases further assessed. It was concluded that tea tree oil should never be administered orally, as it can lead to central nervous system depression and pneumonitis. Applied topically, skin disorders may occur, especially when the oil had been exposed to light or air. This yields monoterpene oxidation products, being potent skin irritants. Tea tree oil stored under appropriate conditions and not exceeding the expiration date should be considered safe to use by non-vulnerable people for non-serious inflammatory skin conditions, although the occurrence of adverse reactions such as contact allergies is difficult to predict.

Comparative safety of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to influenza vaccines: A pharmacovigilance analysis using WHO international database.

Two messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines developed by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna are being rolled out. Despite the high volume of emerging evidence regarding adverse events (AEs) associated with the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, previous studies have thus far been largely based on the comparison between vaccinated and unvaccinated control, possibly highlighting the AE risks with COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Comparing the safety profile of mRNA vaccinated individuals with otherwise vaccinated individuals would enable a more relevant assessment for the safety of mRNA vaccination. We designed a comparative safety study between 18 755 and 27 895 individuals who reported to VigiBase for adverse events following immunization (AEFI) with mRNA COVID-19 and influenza vaccines, respectively, from January 1, 2020, to January 17, 2021. We employed disproportionality analysis to rapidly detect relevant safety signals and compared comparative risks of a diverse span of AEFIs for the vaccines. The safety profile of novel mRNA vaccines was divergent from that of influenza vaccines. The overall pattern suggested that systematic reactions like chill, myalgia, fatigue were more noticeable with the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, while injection site reactogenicity events were more prevalent with the influenza vaccine. Compared to the influenza vaccine, mRNA COVID-19 vaccines demonstrated a significantly higher risk for a few manageable cardiovascular complications, such as hypertensive crisis (adjusted reporting odds ratio [ROR], 12.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.47-65.54), and supraventricular tachycardia (adjusted ROR, 7.94; 95% CI, 2.62-24.00), but lower risk of neurological complications such as syncope, neuralgia, loss of consciousness, Guillain-Barre syndrome, gait disturbance, visual impairment, and dyskinesia. This study has not identified significant safety concerns regarding mRNA vaccination in real-world settings. The overall safety profile patterned a lower risk of serious AEFI following mRNA vaccines compared to influenza vaccines.

Association between NMDAR antagonists, drug abuse and dependence: A disproportionality analysis from the WHO pharmacovigilance database.

Ketamine and dextromethorphan are widely abused psychoactive substances. Inhibition of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) results in neurobehavioural effects including hallucinations, "out of body" sensations and dissociative effects. However, little is known about a possible extended addictive class effect linked to pharmacologically-related amino-adamantane derivatives (e.g., amantadine and memantine). Using a quasi-Bayesian analytic method, we investigated the potential association between the use of approved NMDAR antagonists (i.e., dextromethorphan, ketamine, amantadine and memantine) and the reporting of drug abuse and dependence in the WHO pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase®), which includes >21 million individual case safety reports collected from >130 countries. This disproportionality analysis identified a significant association for all investigated drugs: dextromethorphan (IC = 3.03 [2.97-3.09]), ketamine (IC = 1.70 [1.57-1.83]), amantadine (IC = 0.21 [0.06-0.35]) and memantine (IC = 0.27 [0.13-0.40]), suggesting a class effect for drug abuse and dependence. This first signal requires further investigations, but health professionals need to be alert to the potential of abuse of NMDAR antagonists, especially in the current "opioid epidemic" context, due to their growing interest as non-opioid antinociceptive drugs.

Adverse events of alpelisib: A postmarketing study of the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database.

AIMS: To explore and describe the adverse reaction signals in the safety reporting for alpelisib. METHODS: We performed a disproportionality analysis of the World Health Organization's VigiBase pharmacovigilance database from 1 January 2019 to 30 June 2021. Disproportionality analysis by information components (ICs) were used to evaluate the potential association between adverse events (AEs) and alpelisib. RESULTS: A total of 33 327 reports were extracted, 5695 of them were chosen with alpelisib as the suspected drug. After combining the same ID, 687 cases remained. The 45-64-years group had the most cases (n = 203, 29.55%). There were 129 Preferred Terms with significant signals. Hyperglycaemia (IC025 = 6.74), breast cancer metastatic (IC025 = 5.85) and metastases to liver (IC025 = 4.70) were the AEs with the strongest signal. AEs with the most cases were hyperglycaemia (n = 595), rash (n = 535) and diarrhoea (n = 475). CONCLUSION: We established a comprehensive list of AEs potentially associated with alpelisib. AEs with the most significant signals were hyperglycaemia, breast cancer metastatic, metastases to liver. The AEs with the most cases were hyperglycaemia, rash, diarrhoea, blood glucose increase and nausea.

Fatal adverse events of rivaroxaban combined with aspirin: an analysis using data from VigiBase.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics of fatal adverse events (AEs) of rivaroxaban combined with aspirin and to underline the importance of the rational use of drugs. METHODS: The WHO global database of reported potential side effects of medicinal products (VigiBase) was searched for fatal AEs in the combined use of rivaroxaban and aspirin, and the clinical characteristics of those cases with sufficient information (vigiGrade completeness score ≥ 0.80) were analyzed. RESULTS: By January 19, 2020, 2309 fatal adverse event reports of rivaroxaban combined with aspirin from 21 countries were entered in VigiBase. One hundred and twenty cases contained further information, of which 42 were female (35%) and 78 were male (65%). The median age was 75 (range 34 to 93) years, and 109 cases (91%) were elderly patients (≥ 65 years). The AEs listed in the fatal case reports included bleeding in 114 cases (mainly intracranial hemorrhage and gastrointestinal hemorrhage, 59 and 46 respectively, accounting for 88%) and ischemic events in six cases (ischemic stroke in three, acute myocardial infarction in two, myocardial infarction combined with acute liver failure in one). Among the patients with bleeding events, 108 (95%) had existing risk factors for bleeding or for interacting with aspirin or rivaroxaban. These may be divided into the following: diseases (hypertension, renal impairment, history of stroke, peptic ulcer, or previous bleeding), drugs (high dose aspirin, antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulants, P-gp inhibitors/CYP3A4 inhibitors, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, steroids, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors), or other factors (e.g., elderly, low body weight, or excessive intake of ginger, fish oil, or alcohol). There were 45 cases with two or more of these risk factors in addition to rivaroxaban and aspirin. Patients with ischemic events are often in very high-risk groups of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or self-discontinuation of treated drugs. Medication errors occurred in 24 patients (20%): excessive treatment in 17 cases, contraindication in three, frequency error in two, excessive treatment combined with contraindication in one, and self-discontinuation in one. CONCLUSIONS: Fatal AEs related to rivaroxaban combined with aspirin, including bleeding and ischemic events, have been reported mostly in the elderly, and sometimes involved medication errors. The fatal AEs mainly manifested as serious bleeding, and most of them occurred in patients with concurrent multiple risk factors. Monitoring coagulation during rivaroxaban treatment is recommended in very high-risk ASCVD populations, and attention should be paid to prevention of medication errors.

Adverse drug reactions associated with doxorubicin and epirubicin: A descriptive analysis from VigiBase.

BACKGROUND: Cancer is one of the leading causes of death globally. Owing to high toxicity, patients using chemotherapy drugs have a higher risk for developing adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Pharmacovigilance studies are essential in oncology to evaluate ADRs caused by anticancer drugs and improve patient safety. This study aimed to analyze serious ADRs associated with the use of doxorubicin and epirubicin reported to VigiBase. METHOD: All anonymized data on suspected ADRs for doxorubicin and epirubicin as 'serious' and 'suspected' or 'interacting' drugs between 1968 and 30 August 2021, were extracted from VigiBase. Descriptive statistics were conducted in Microsoft Excel, and data were summarized using frequencies and percentages. RESULTS: A total of 35,620 serious individual case safety reports was analyzed. The majority of reports were from females (Dox = 61.41%; Epi = 86.56%), while the predominant age group was 45-64 years (Dox = 42.06%; Epi = 57.39%). Physicians were the more likely group to report serious ADRs (Dox = 50.03%; Epi = 34.11%). In general, Europe reported the highest for doxorubicin (38.08%), while Asia recorded the highest reports for epirubicin (53.28%). Oceania reported the least for both drugs (Dox = 0.45%; Epi = 0.04%), followed by Africa (Dox = 0.72%; Epi = 0.29%). Blood and lymphatic system disorders were the most reported serious category (Dox = 11053 [44.47%]; Epi = 6659 [61.84%]). The most common manifestations were febrile neutropenia (Dox = 10.52%) and bone marrow failure (Epi = 23.89%). CONCLUSION: This study provides relevant global insights into serious ADRs for doxorubicin and epirubicin. This knowledge may assist in minimizing and proactively managing ADRs. It can also inform policies to improve patients' quality of life.

Smartphone-based mobile applications for adverse drug reactions reporting: global status and country experience.

BACKGROUND: Smartphone technology can support paperless reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The aims of this study were to systematically assess smartphone ADR-reporting applications, understand their qualitative and quantitative impact on ADR reporting, and garner key lessons from owners and developers. METHODS: This study had three components: (1) An assessment of ADR-reporting apps, (2) an online survey on the impact of app implementation on ADR reporting and the experiences of app developers and owners, and (3) a search of VigiBase, the World Health Organization global database of individual case safety reports (ICSRs), to observe trends in the number of ADR reports targeting countries where the apps were implemented. RESULTS: Twenty-two apps were included. Eight out of the 22 apps were for countries in the WHO African region. Features observed included E2B data elements (E stands for efficacy) and functions supporting reporting and user engagement. Seventeen app developers and owners answered to the survey and reported overall positive experiences with app features, and post-launch increases in the total number of ICSRs. User type and user environment were cited as factors influencing app use: Respondents said younger people and/or those with an inclination to use technology were more likely to use apps compared to older or more technology-averse people, while respondents in countries with limited internet connectivity reported persistent difficulties in app use. CONCLUSIONS: Smartphone apps for reporting ADRs offer added value compared to conventional reporting tools. Reporting tools should be selected based on interface features and factors that may influence app usage.