Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris.

BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris commonly affects adults, adolescents, and preadolescents aged 9 years or older. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of acne. METHODS: A work group conducted a systematic review and applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach for assessing the certainty of evidence and formulating and grading recommendations. RESULTS: This guideline presents 18 evidence-based recommendations and 5 good practice statements. Strong recommendations are made for benzoyl peroxide, topical retinoids, topical antibiotics, and oral doxycycline. Oral isotretinoin is strongly recommended for acne that is severe, causing psychosocial burden or scarring, or failing standard oral or topical therapy. Conditional recommendations are made for topical clascoterone, salicylic acid, and azelaic acid, as well as for oral minocycline, sarecycline, combined oral contraceptive pills, and spironolactone. Combining topical therapies with multiple mechanisms of action, limiting systemic antibiotic use, combining systemic antibiotics with topical therapies, and adding intralesional corticosteroid injections for larger acne lesions are recommended as good practice statements. LIMITATIONS: Analysis is based on the best available evidence at the time of the systematic review. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of acne vulgaris.

Does adding hydrogen peroxide to chlorhexidine gluconate increase the effectiveness of skin preparation in reducing cutaneous Cutibacterium levels? A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder periprosthetic joint infection is most commonly caused by Cutibacterium. Effective removal of these bacteria from the skin is difficult because Cutibacterium live protected in the dermal sebaceous glands beneath the skin surface to which surgical preparation solutions, such as chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), are applied. There is conflicting evidence on the additional benefit of using hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) as an adjunct to CHG in eliminating Cutibacterium from the skin. A previous study demonstrated that after CHG skin preparation, repopulation of Cutibacterium from sebaceous glands onto the skin surface occurs in 90% of shoulders by 60 minutes after application. The objective of this randomized controlled study was to determine the effectiveness of adding H2O2 to CHG in reducing skin Cutibacterium. METHODS: Eighteen male volunteers (36 shoulders) were recruited for this study. The 2 shoulders of each volunteer were randomized to receive the control preparation ("CHG-only" - 2% CHG in 70% isopropyl alcohol alone) or the study preparation ("H2O2+CHG" - 3% H2O2 followed by 2% CHG in 70% isopropyl alcohol). Skin swabs were taken from each shoulder prior to skin preparation and again at 60 minutes after preparation. Swabs were cultured for Cutibacterium and observed for 14 days. Cutibacterium skin load was reported using a semiquantitative system based on the number of quadrants growing on the culture plate. RESULTS: Prior to skin preparation, 100% of the CHG-only shoulders and 100% of the H2O2+CHG shoulders had positive skin surface cultures for Cutibacterium. Repopulation of Cutibacterium on the skin at 60 minutes occurred in 78% of CHG-only and 78% of H2O2+CHG shoulders (P = 1.00). Reduction of Cutibacterium skin levels occurred in 56% of CHG-only and 61% of H2O2+CHG shoulders (P = .735). Cutibacterium levels were significantly decreased from before skin preparation to 60 minutes after preparation in both the CHG-only (2.1 ± 0.8 to 1.3 ± 0.9, P = .003) and the H2O2+CHG groups (2.2 ± 0.7 to 1.4 ± 0.9, P < .001). Substantial skin surface levels of Cutibacterium were present at 60 minutes after both preparations. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized controlled study, there was no additional benefit of using hydrogen peroxide as an adjunct to chlorhexidine gluconate skin preparation in the reduction of cutaneous Cutibacterium levels. Neither preparation was able to eliminate repopulation of Cutibacterium on the skin surface from the dermal sebaceous glands.

Distinct skin microbiome modulation following different topical acne treatments in mild acne vulgaris patients: A randomized, investigator-blinded exploratory study.

The effects of topical non-antibiotic acne treatment on skin microbiota have rarely been demonstrated. In the study, we randomized 45 mild acne vulgaris participants into three treatment groups, including a cream-gel dermocosmetic containing Aqua Posae Filiformis, lipohydroxy acid, salicylic acid, linoleic acid, niacinamide and piroctone olamine (DC), retinoic acid 0.025% cream (VAA) and benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel (BP). At months 0, 1 and 3, skin specimens were swabbed from the cheek and forehead and sequenced by targeting V3-V4 regions of the 16 S rRNA gene. QIIME2 was used to characterize bacterial communities. Acne severity, sebum level and tolerability were assessed concomitantly in each visit. We found that both VAA and BP could significantly reduce the bacterial diversity at month 1 (p-value = 0.010 and 0.004 respectively), while no significant reduction was observed in DC group. The microbiota compositions also significantly altered for beta diversity in all treatments (all p-value = 0.001). An increased Cutibacterium with decreased Staphylococcus relative abundance was observed at months 1 and 3 in DC group, while an opposite trend was demonstrated in VAA and BP groups. These findings suggest a potential impact of DC, VAA and BP on the diversity and composition profiles of the skin microbiota in mild acne participants.

Clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/benzoyl peroxide 3.1% gel for moderate-to-severe acne: Efficacy and safety results from two randomized phase 3 trials.

BACKGROUND: A three-pronged acne treatment approach-combining an antibiotic, antibacterial agent, and retinoid-may provide greater efficacy than single/double treatments. Topical clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 3.1% gel (IDP-126) is the first fixed-dose triple-combination in development for acne. OBJECTIVE: To confirm efficacy, safety, and tolerability of IDP-126 gel in acne treatment. METHODS: Two phase 3, double-blind, 12-week studies randomized participants aged ≥9 years with moderate-to-severe acne (N = 183; N = 180) 2:1 to once-daily IDP-126 or vehicle gel. Co-primary endpoints comprised participants achieving ≥2-grade reduction from baseline in Evaluator's Global Severity Score (EGSS) and clear/almost clear skin (treatment success) and change from baseline in inflammatory/noninflammatory lesion counts. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed. RESULTS: At week 12, 49.6% and 50.5% of participants achieved treatment success with IDP-126 versus 24.9% and 20.5% with vehicle (P < .01, both). IDP-126 also provided significantly greater reductions in inflammatory/noninflammatory lesions versus vehicle (least-squares mean percent range: 72.7% to 80.1% vs 47.6% to 59.6%; P < .001, all). Most TEAEs were of mild-moderate severity. LIMITATIONS: Inter-observer bias/variation in acne severity ratings, limited treatment duration, and population differences that may not generalize to real-world populations. CONCLUSION: The innovative fixed-dose, triple-combination IDP-126 gel was efficacious and well tolerated in 2 clinical studies of participants with moderate-to-severe acne.

Efficacy and safety of microencapsulated benzoyl peroxide and microencapsulated tretinoin for the treatment of acne vulgaris: Results from two phase 3 double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled studies.

BACKGROUND: Benzoyl peroxide and tretinoin are commonly prescribed acne treatments. Historically, they have been difficult to combine in a single formulation due to chemical instability, and both medications are potentially irritating. Microencapsulation helps overcome these challenges. OBJECTIVE: Examine efficacy, safety, and tolerability of encapsulated BPO/encapsulated tretinoin (E-BPO/T) cream, 3%/0.1%. METHODS: Subjects ≥9 years old with moderate to severe acne were enrolled in 2 multicenter, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, parallel trials and randomized (2:1) to 12 weeks of once-daily E-BPO/T (n = 571) or vehicle cream (n = 287). RESULTS: E-BPO/T was significantly superior to vehicle in both studies, with more subjects achieving IGA success with E-BPO/T (38.5%/25.4%) versus vehicle (11.5%/14.7%; P < .001/P = .017). The change from baseline in inflammatory lesion count for E-BPO/T was -21.6 versus -14.8 for vehicle (P < .001) in study 1 and -16.2 versus -14.1 (P = .018) in study 2. The changes from baseline in noninflammatory lesions for E-BPO/T were -29.7 versus -19.8 for vehicle (P < .001) and -24.2 and -17.4 (P < .001) in studies 1 and 2, respectively. E-BPO/T was well tolerated in both studies. LIMITATIONS: Long-term data are not available. CONCLUSION: E-BPO/T provided statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in IGA and inflammatory and noninflammatory lesion counts and was well tolerated in subjects with moderate to severe acne.

Clindamycin-Benzoyl Peroxide Gel Compared with Clindamycin Lotion for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Randomized Controlled Assessor-Blinded Intra-Patient Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance is a major concern, especially in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). However, antibiotics form a cornerstone in its treatment. Topical clindamycin is known to cause bacterial resistance but is still advised as monotherapy for the treatment of mild to moderate HS. METHODS: This is a randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, intra-patient pilot trial to compare the clinical efficacy of clindamycin-benzoyl peroxide gel with clindamycin lotion in patients with mild to moderate HS. Two contralateral body sites were randomized for treatment in each patient. The primary outcome was the difference in the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score (IHS4) between the two groups after 12 weeks. Secondary objectives were feasibility of the intra-patient design, efficacy within treatment groups, effect on HS pain, HS itch, patient satisfaction, antibiotic resistance, and the prolonged efficacy after 16 weeks. RESULTS: Ten patients were included, resulting in two groups of 10 treated body sites. No significant differences were found between the two groups for all measurements after 12 or 16 weeks, while both therapies led to an improvement in the IHS4, pain, and itch scores. A significant decrease was observed in the IHS4 for both the clindamycin lotion (-1.5; p < 0.05) and the clindamycin-benzoyl peroxide gel (-2; p < 0.01) after 16 weeks, and the pain scores were reduced from 7 to 2.5, p < 0.01 and 6.5 to 3, p = 0.03, respectively. Using the IHS4-55, we identified 50% of patients as responders in both groups after 12 weeks. The intra-patient design, however, unexpectedly appeared to hinder the inclusion of patients. CONCLUSION: Clindamycin-benzoyl peroxide gel showed favorable clinical efficacy results, similar to clindamycin lotion, suggesting that it could replace clindamycin lotion in the treatment of mild to moderate HS and to prevent antibiotic resistance. A larger controlled trial is needed to validate these results.

Preoperative topical benzoyl peroxide treatment is effective in reducing Cutibacterium acnes in shoulder surgery: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Cutibacterium acnes (C acnes) colonization can have a significant impact on patients undergoing both arthroscopic and open shoulder surgery with regard to postoperative infection. Its resistance to standard preoperative skin preparations and prophylactic antibiotics has led to a need for a more targeted therapy. Topical benzoyl peroxide (BPO) has been used by dermatologists in the treatment for acnes due to its bactericidal and penetrative effects through the dermal layer. The aim of this systematic review is to review the effectiveness of topical BPO preoperatively in shoulder surgery in reducing C acnes colonization and postoperative infection. METHODS: A review of the online databases Medline and Embase was conducted on December 15, 2021, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The review was registered prospectively in the PROSPERO database. Clinical studies reporting superficial and deep sample microbiology and postoperative complications were included. The studies were appraised using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (ROB 2) tool for randomized studies and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 10 studies for inclusion (6 randomized control trials, 2 prospective cohort studies, and 2 case series), including a total of 482 patients. Seven studies were comparable, testing BPO against alternative standard skin preparations. Of the 10 studies, 7 showed a decrease in the load of C acnes on the skin and/or deep tissues, of which 6 demonstrated statistical significance. Men were shown to have a statistically significant increase in the colonization rate of C acnes. Scheer et al (2021) demonstrated 4500 colony-forming units/mL in males and 900 colony-forming units/mL in females. In studies where the number of BPO applications was higher, BPO appeared more effective. Dizay et al demonstrated C acnes elimination in 78.9% with more than 1 application compared with 66.7% if only applied once. Three studies looked at the effectiveness of BPO during the operative timeline with 1 demonstrating its statistically significant effectiveness at reducing colonization 2 hours into the operation (P = .048). CONCLUSION: BPO is effective as a topical treatment at reducing C acnes colonization before shoulder surgery. However, the relationship between duration of treatment, frequency of application, and gender requires further research.

The influence of benzoyl peroxide on skin microbiota and the epidermal barrier for acne vulgaris.

The disordered skin microbiome has been reported to contribute to the pathogenesis of acne vulgaris, for which benzoyl peroxide (BPO) has long been recommended as the first-line therapy. However, there are no data regarding the effect of BPO treatment on skin microbiota and the epidermal barrier in young adults with acne vulgaris. Thirty-three patients with acne vulgaris and 19 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. All patients received topical treatment with BPO 5% gel for 12 weeks. The epidermal barrier was analyzed at baseline and after treatment. Microbial diversity was analyzed using a high-throughput sequencing approach targeting the V3-V4 region of 16S rRNA genes. After receiving treatment with BPO, patients had significant improvement in their Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) score, porphyrin, and red areas (p < 0.05), and the presence of sebum, stratum corneum hydration (SCH), and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) increased (p < 0.05). When compared with baseline, microbial diversity was significantly reduced after treatment, as calculated by the goods coverage (p = 0.0017), Shannon (p = 0.0094), and Simpson (p = 0.0017) diversity indices. The prevalence of the genus Cutibacterium (before treatment: 5.64 [3.50, 7.78] vs. after treatment: 2.43 [1.81, 3.05], p = 0.011) was significantly reduced after treatment while Staphylococcus (before treatment: 43.80 [36.62, 50.98] vs. after treatment: 53.38 [44.88, 61.87], p = 0.075) tended to increase. The abundance of Staphylococcus was negatively associated with SCH (p = 0.008, r = -0.286). Despite its contribution to an improved GAGS score, BPO treatment for acne vulgaris may reduce microbial diversity and damage the epidermal barrier.

Contact dermatitis in children caused by diabetes devices.

BACKGROUND: Insulin pumps and glucose monitoring devices improve diabetes mellitus control and enhance patients' quality of life. However, a growing number of adverse cutaneous reactions related to the use of these devices have been reported. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the culprits of localized contact dermatitis in paediatric patients with diabetes caused by insulin pumps and glucose monitoring devices. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 15 paediatric patients patch tested as part of a clinical investigation for skin reactions associated with insulin pumps and glucose monitoring devices. RESULTS: Seven patients had positive patch test reactions to isobornyl acrylate (IBOA) and five had positive reactions to benzoyl peroxide (BP). Positive patch test reactions to materials from the glucose sensor and/or insulin pump were seen in 10 of the 15 patients. Three had positive reactions to adhesive remover wipe from Smith and Nephew Remove and four had reactions to EMLA plaster. CONCLUSION: A high share of patients showed positive reactions to IBOA and/or their medical devices (insulin pumps or glucose devices). A third of patients showed positive reactions to BP. The presence of additional unidentified allergens cannot be excluded, highlighting the importance of access to a full description of the chemical composition of the devices.

Acne cream reduces the deep Cutibacterium acnes tissue load before elective open shoulder surgery: a randomized controlled pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Cutibacterium acnes is the main pathogen in periprosthetic shoulder infections. In acne vulgaris therapy, benzoyl peroxide-miconazole nitrate cream effectively reduces the superficial C acnes burden of the skin. Its additional potential in the subcutaneous and capsular layers (eg, for prevention of future periprosthetic shoulder infections) is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a topical acne vulgaris cream (benzoyl peroxide-miconazole nitrate) to reduce subcutaneous and capsular C acnes in individuals with C acnes skin colonization undergoing open shoulder surgery. METHODS: A prospective randomized pilot trial was performed, allocating 60 adult patients (1:1) to either a 7-day preoperative application of a commercial acne cream (benzoyl peroxide-miconazole nitrate) on the preoperative skin (intervention group) or no cream (control group) from November 1, 2018, to May 31, 2020. The superficial skin of the shoulder was sampled at enrollment and before incision, and deep subcutaneous and capsular shoulder samples were taken during surgery. RESULTS: Sixty patients (mean age, 59 years; 55% female patients) undergoing primary open shoulder surgery (17 Latarjet procedures and 43 arthroplasties) were included in the study. At baseline, both randomized groups showed the presence of C acnes on the skin at a rate of 60% (18 of 30 patients in intervention group and 19 of 30 patients in control group, P = .79). In patients with C acnes skin colonization, the intervention resulted in a significant reduction in the overall number of intraoperative samples with positive findings compared with the control group (8 of 18 patients vs. 16 of 19 patients, P = .01), especially in capsular samples (0 of 18 patients vs. 4 of 19 patients, P = .04). CONCLUSION: The topical 7-day preoperative skin application of acne cream (benzoyl peroxide-miconazole nitrate) significantly reduced the intraoperative C acnes load in 56% of the patients in the intervention group compared with 16% of the control patients.

Efficacy of combinational therapy using blue light and benzoyl peroxide in reducing Cutibacterium acnes bioburden at the deltopectoral interval: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of blue light therapy (BLT) and 5% topical benzoyl peroxide (BPO) gel in combination with standard chlorhexidine (CHX) preparation in eradicating Cutibacterium acnes at the deltopectoral interval measured by positive, quantitative culture findings. METHODS: Adult male volunteers were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups: BPO, BLT, and BPO followed by BLT. Contralateral shoulders served as matched controls. Volunteers randomized to BPO applied the gel for a total of 5 treatments. In the BLT group, a single 23-minute treatment was administered at an estimated irradiance of 40 mW/cm2 (radiant exposure, 55.2 J/cm2). In the BPO-BLT group, volunteers received both treatments as described earlier. After treatment with either BPO, BLT, or both, a single swab culture was taken from the treatment shoulder. Next, control and treatment shoulders were prepared with CHX, and cultures were taken from each shoulder. Cultures were sent for anaerobic quantitative growth analysis with both polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing confirmation of presumptive C acnes colonies. RESULTS: This study enrolled 60 male volunteers, 20 per group, with no loss to follow-up. After treatment but prior to CHX administration, all culture samples in the BPO group and BLT group grew C acnes. Prior to CHX, 16 samples (80%) in the BPO-BLT group grew C acnes. On quantitative analysis, the BPO group and BPO-BLT group had significantly less growth of C acnes compared with the BLT group after treatment but prior to CHX (P < .05 for each). Following CHX administration, the BPO and BPO-BLT groups had significantly fewer positive culture findings (odds ratios of 0.03 and 0.29, respectively) and less quantity of growth compared with their control arms (P < .05). This was not seen in the BLT group. For quantitative between-group analysis, no significant synergistic effects were seen with BPO-BLT compared with BPO alone (P = .688). There was no difference in side effects between groups. CONCLUSION: The combination of topical BPO and CHX was effective at eliminating C acnes in most cases. BLT alone did not demonstrate effective antimicrobial properties against C acnes at the radiant exposure administered in this study. Combining BPO and BLT did not lead to significant synergistic antimicrobial effects. Both BPO and BLT are safe with few, transient side effects reported. More work is needed to determine whether BLT at higher radiant exposures or serial treatment results in bactericidal effects against C acnes in vivo.

Benzoyl peroxide treatment decreases Cutibacterium acnes in shoulder surgery, from skin incision until wound closure.

INTRODUCTION: Most surgical site infections after shoulder surgery are caused by Cutibacterium acnes. Topically applied benzoyl peroxide (BPO) has for years been used to decrease the skin load of C acnes in treatment of acne vulgaris. The purpose of this study was to examine this effect on bacterial colonization in patients subjected to elective shoulder surgery at different stages of the procedure. METHODS: A total of 100 patients scheduled for primary elective open shoulder surgery were randomized to prepare either with BPO or according to local guidelines-with soap (control group). Four skin swabs were taken in a standardized manner at different times, before and after surgical skin preparation, 1 in dermis, and finally after the skin was sutured. Before skin incision, 5 punch biopsies (3 mm in diameter and maximum 4 mm deep) were retrieved spaced 2 cm apart in the planned skin incision. On culturing, quantification of C acnes was made by serial dilutions. RESULTS: Men had a 5-fold higher amount of C acnes on untreated skin. Treatment with BPO considerably lowered this count (P = .0001) both before and after skin disinfection compared to the control group. This positive effect of BPO persisted until skin closure, the point at which some recolonization of C acnes had occurred, but to a higher degree in the control group (P = .040). CONCLUSION: Preoperative BPO treatment of the shoulder may be an effective method to decrease bacterial skin load of C acnes from skin incision until wound closure.

Benzil Photoperoxidations in Polymer Films and Crosslinking by the Resultant Benzoyl Peroxides in Polystyrene and Other Polymers.

Benzil (BZ) can be converted almost quantitatively to benzoyl peroxide (BP) in aerated polymer films upon irradiation at >400 nm (i.e., the long-wavelength edge of the n→π* absorption band of BZ, where BP does not absorb). Here, we summarize results for the photoperoxidation of BZ structures with molecular oxygen, principally in glassy polymer matrices. Some of the polymers are doped directly with BZ or its derivatives, and others, contain covalently attached BZ pendant groups from which BP groups are derived. While the decomposition of low-molecular-weight BP doped into polymer films (such as those of polystyrene (PS)) results in a net decrease in polymer molecular weight, thermal decomposition of pendant BP groups is an efficient method for chain crosslinking. Crosslinking of PS films doped with a molecule containing two covalently linked BZ or BP groups proceeds in a similar fashion. Free radicals from the covalently attached BP allow grafting of new monomers, as well. Additionally, the use of radiation filtered through masks has been used to create patterns of polymers on solid surfaces. Crosslinking of photodegradable poly(phenyl vinyl ketone) with BP structures obtained by photoperoxidation of BZ structures for the preparation of photodegradable polymer networks is described as well. In sum, the use of BZ and BP and their derivatives offers simple and convenient routes for modifying polymer chains and, especially, for crosslinking them. Specific applications of each use and process are provided. Although applications with PS are featured here, the methodologies described are amenable to a wide variety of other polymers.

Strategies to decolonize the shoulder of Cutibacterium acnes: a review of the literature.

Cutibacterium acnes is the most prevalent cause of joint infection after shoulder surgery. Current methods for decolonizing this bacterium from the shoulder region have proved ineffective owing to its unique niche within dermal sebaceous glands and hair follicles. When we are making decisions to decolonize the skin of C acnes, the risks associated with decolonization must be balanced by the potential benefits of reduced deep tissue inoculation. The purpose of this review was to describe currently available methods of decolonization and their efficacy.

The presence of Cutibacterium acnes on the skin of the shoulder after the use of benzoyl peroxide: a placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomized trial.

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that benzoyl peroxide (BPO) would reduce the presence of Cutibacterium acnes on the skin of the shoulder by 50% compared with placebo. Infections after shoulder surgery are most commonly caused by C acnes. Current prophylactic methods do not effectively reduce the bacterial load of this bacterium. However, it seems that BPO may reduce C acnes on the skin of the shoulder. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of BPO on the presence of C acnes on the shoulder skin. METHODS: A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was performed including healthy participants aged between 40 and 80 years. Thirty participants with C acnes on the shoulder skin according to baseline skin swabs were randomized into the BPO or placebo group. After gel application 5 times, skin swabs were taken to determine the presence of C acnes. RESULTS: Forty-two participants were screened for the presence of C acnes to include 30 participants with the bacterium. Participants with C acnes at baseline were 7.4 years younger than participants without C acnes (P = .015). One participant in the placebo group dropped out before application because of fear of adverse events. After application, C acnes remained present in 3 of 15 participants (20.0%) in the BPO group and in 10 of 14 participants (71.4%) in the placebo group, resulting in a 51.4% reduction in the presence of C acnes. CONCLUSION: Applying BPO 5 times on the shoulder skin effectively reduces C acnes. Consequently, BPO may reduce the risk of postoperative infections.

Benzoyl peroxide use transiently decreases Cutibacterium acnes load on the shoulder.

BACKGROUND: Cutibacterium acnes is the most common pathogen in shoulder prosthetic joint infections. Short-contact benzoyl peroxide (BPO) solutions effectively reduce C acnes loads on the shoulder preoperatively. It is unknown how long the effect of BPO lasts. We evaluated C acnes counts 1 week after BPO application. We hypothesized that BPO would decrease C acnes burden with a rebound after 1 week. METHODS: Screening of 102 healthy volunteers with no history of shoulder surgery or C acnes infection was performed to establish bacterial counts. Thirty-four participants were selected based on an established threshold. Each was given BPO 5% for 3 consecutive days of application on either the left or right shoulder as indicated by a random number generator. Deep sebaceous gland cultures were obtained with a detergent scrub technique before BPO application, after 3 days of use, and 1 week after BPO treatment commenced. RESULTS: The differences between the logarithmic reduction and the logarithmic rebound at the anterior, lateral, and posterior sites were statistically significant. Anteriorly, the average log reduction was -0.44 and the average log rebound was 0.69 (P = .003). Laterally, reduction was -0.64 and rebound was 0.74 (P = .003). Posteriorly, reduction was -0.63 and rebound was 0.78 (P = .008). At the axilla, reduction was -0.40 and rebound was 0.31 (P = .10). The differences in C acnes burden between pretreatment and 1-week counts at all sites were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: A significant decrease in C acnes burden occurred after BPO application but was not permanent. Significant rebound occurred just 1 week later.

A break-even analysis of benzoyl peroxide and hydrogen peroxide for infection prevention in shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Newer strategies to decolonize the shoulder of Cutibacterium acnes may hold promise in minimizing the occurrence of infections after shoulder arthroplasty, but little is known about their cost-effectiveness. Break-even models can determine the economic viability of interventions in settings with low outcome event rates that would realistically preclude a randomized clinical trial. We used such modeling to determine the economic viability of benzoyl peroxide and hydrogen peroxide for infection prevention in shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: Skin decolonization protocol costs ($11.76 for benzoyl peroxide; $0.96 for hydrogen peroxide), baseline infection rates for shoulder arthroplasty (0.70%), and infection-related care costs ($50,230) were derived from institutional records and the literature. A break-even equation incorporating these variables was developed to determine the absolute risk reduction (ARR) in the infection rate to make prophylactic use economically justified. The number needed to treat was calculated from the ARR. RESULTS: Topical benzoyl peroxide is considered economically justified if it prevents at least 1 infection out of 4348 shoulder arthroplasties (ARR = 0.023%). Hydrogen peroxide is economically justified if it prevents at least 1 infection out of 50,000 cases (ARR = 0.002%). These protocols remained economically viable at varying unit costs, initial infection rates, and infection-related care costs. CONCLUSIONS: The use of topical benzoyl peroxide and skin preparations with hydrogen peroxide are highly economically justified practices for infection prevention in shoulder arthroplasty. Efforts to determine drawbacks of routine skin decolonization strategies are warranted as they may change the value analysis.

Randomized controlled trial of chlorhexidine wash versus benzoyl peroxide soap for home surgical preparation: neither is effective in removing Cutibacterium from the skin of shoulder arthroplasty patients.

INTRODUCTION: Home chlorhexidine washes prior to shoulder surgery are commonly used in an attempt to reduce the skin bacterial load. However, recent studies have suggested that this agent is relatively ineffective against Cutibacterium acne. Benzoyl peroxide soap is a treatment for acne, but evidence regarding its effectiveness as prophylaxis in shoulder surgery is lacking. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of home chlorhexidine washes with benzoyl peroxide soap (BPO) in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty surgery in reducing Cutibacterium levels on the skin surface and in the dermis. METHODS: Fifty male patients planning to undergo shoulder arthroplasty were consented to be randomized into treatment with 4% chlorhexidine solution (CHG) and 10% benzoyl peroxide soap (BPO) used to wash the operative shoulder the night prior and morning of surgery. Skin swabs prior to incision and dermal wound swabs after incision were obtained, and the bacterial load was reported in a semiquantitative manner as the Specimen Cutibacterium Value (SpCuV). The two groups were compared with regards to the percent positivity of the skin surface and incised dermal edge as well as the bacterial load at each site. RESULTS: Skin surface swabs were positive in 100% of patients using CHG and 100% of patients using BPO soap. The Cutibacterium load (SpCuV) on the skin surface was similar between the two groups (CHG 1.6 ± 1.1 vs. BPO 1.5 ± 1.4, p = 0.681). The percentages of dermal cultures that were positive were not significantly different between the two groups (CHG 61% vs BPO 46%, p = 0.369). The Cutibacterium load (SpCuV) on the incised dermal edge was similar between the two groups (CHG 0.8 ± 1.0 vs. BPO 0.8 ± 1.4, p = 0.991). DISCUSSION: Neither BPO soap nor chlorhexidine washes prior to shoulder surgery were effective in eliminating Cutibacterium from the skin surface or the incised dermal edge. Further study of means of reducing the Cutibacterium load of the skin at the time of shoulder arthroplasty is warranted.