High Prevalence of Anorectal Dysfunction in Ambulatory Patients with Chronic Constipation, Regardless of Colon Transit Time.

BACKGROUND: Classification of chronic constipation (CC) into its three subtypes of slow transit constipation, defecation disorder and normal transit constipation, may improve its multifaceted management. We assessed the merits of the London classification in patients with CC, who were studied by both wireless motility capsule (WMC) and high-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM), examining their relative utilities in decision-making.s PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective, community-based study of prospectively collected data on patients with CC by Rome IV criteria, who underwent WMC and HR-ARM, Balloon Expulsion Test, and Rectal Sensory Testing. Clinical assessment was made by standard questionnaires. On WMC, standard criteria for colonic transit time (CTT) were used (normal CTT < 59 h). The hierarchical London classification was used for HR-ARM analyses. RESULTS: Of 1261 patients with CC, 166 (91 M; ages 22-86) received technically satisfactory WMC and HR-ARM, formed the analyzed study cohort, of whom 84 had normal CTT and 82 had prolonged CTT (> 59 h). Patients with slow CTT were significantly older and had longer duration and more severe disease. Using the London classification criteria for disorders of anorectal function, we noted a high prevalence of anorectal dysfunction, regardless of CTT. Except for lower rate of anal hypertonicity in patients with slow CTT, disorders of recto-anal coordination, and rectal sensation were seen at a comparable rate in patients with CC, regardless of CTT. CONCLUSION: There is a significant overlap of anorectal disorders in patients with slow CTT. There is questionable specificity and utility of WMC and HR-ARM in assessing patients with CC. More work is needed to demonstrate the value of these studies as surrogate markers of the disease and its response to multifaceted therapy.

Relationship of Age and Gender to Motility Test Results and Symptoms in Patients with Chronic Constipation.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients with chronic constipation (CC) exhibit symptoms and functional abnormalities upon testing, but their relationship to age and gender is unclear. We assessed age- and gender-related differences in symptoms, colon transit time, and anorectal motility, sensation, and expulsion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective, post hoc data analysis of patients with CC, who underwent Wireless Motility Capsule (WMC), High-Resolution Anorectal Manometry (HR-ARM), Balloon Expulsion Test (BET) and Rectal Sensory Testing (RST). Clinical assessment was made by questionnaires. Standard WMC criteria for colonic transit time (CTT) and the London classification was used for HR-ARM analyses, and regression plots between age, gender, CTT, HR-HRM, RST and BET were calculated. RESULTS: We studied 75 women and 91 men. Abdominal pain, infrequent defecation, incomplete evacuation, defecatory straining, and multiple motility and anorectal function abnormalities were common. Abdominal pain was least frequently, and straining was most frequently associated with a motility abnormality. For each symptom, the highest prevalence was associated with failed BET. There was a significant increase in CTT with age only in men (p = 0.0006). In men, for each year of age there was a CTT increase of 1.02 h. The prevalence of abdominal pain and incomplete evacuation for females was significantly higher than that for males (both P < 0.05). The prevalence of low anal squeeze pressure for females was significantly higher than that for males, and the prevalence of poor rectal sensation for males was significantly higher than that for females (both P < 0.05). A significant decrease in basal anal and squeeze pressures with age occurred in women (p < 0.0001); an increase in age of one year was associated with a decrease in anal base pressure of 1.2 mmHg. Abnormal CTT and HR-ARM tests were associated with increased symptom frequency, but not severity. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant age- and gender-related differences in symptoms, CTT, and HR-HRM parameters, rectal sensation, and expulsion, that may influence the multifaceted management of constipation.

Clinical utility of anal sphincter relaxation integral in water-perfused and solid-state high-resolution anorectal manometry.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: We investigated the diagnostic performance of the anal sphincter relaxation integral (ASRI) for infants with Hirschsprung's disease (HD). METHODS: We performed water-perfused high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) in 18 infants (9 with HD), and solid-state HRAM in another 18 infants (4 with HD). We calculated the ASRI during the rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) maneuver at pressure cutoffs of <10 mmHg (ASRI 10) and <15 mmHg (ASRI 15). We investigated the diagnostic performance of the ASRI for HD in infants undergoing water-perfused and solid-state HRAM. RESULTS: HD infants who underwent either water-perfused or solid-state HRAM had significantly lower ASRI 10 and ASRI 15 values, compared with non-HD infants (P < 0.05 and P < 0.05, respectively). Using the water-perfused HRAM system, ASRI 10 and ASRI 15 values of <7 and <29 mmHg s.cm, respectively, exhibited good diagnostic performance for HD (88.89% and 88.89%, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that ASRI 10 and ASRI 15 values of <5.5 and <20 mmHg s.cm, respectively, were optimal for the diagnosis of HD infants when using the solid-state HRAM system, with high diagnostic accuracies of 83.33% and 83.33%, respectively. CONCLUSION: ASRI may assist the diagnosis of HD infants using either water-perfused or solid-state HRAM. These systems require different catheter-specific ASRI cutoffs for the prediction of HD.

Short-term clinical and manometric outcomes of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: a large single-centre series.

BACKGROUND: Faecal incontinence (FI) is common, with a significant impact on quality of life. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a therapy for FI; however, its role has recently been questioned. Here we report the short-term clinical and manometric outcomes in a large tertiary centre. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospective PTNS database was performed, extracting patient-reported FI outcome measures including bowel diary, the St Marks's Incontinence Score (SMIS) and Manchester Health Questionnaire (MHQ). Successful treatment was > 50% improvement in symptoms, whilst a partial response was 25-50% improvement. High-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) results before and after PTNS were recorded. RESULTS: Data were available from 135 patients [119 (88%) females; median age: 60 years (range: 27-82years)]. Overall, patients reported a reduction in urge FI (2.5-1) and passive FI episodes (2-1.5; p < 0.05) alongside a reduction in SMIS (16.5-14) and MHQ (517.5-460.0; p < 0.001). Some 76 (56%) patients reported success, whilst a further 20 (15%) reported a partial response. There were statistically significant reductions in rectal balloon thresholds and an increase in incremental squeeze pressure; however, these changes were independent of treatment success. CONCLUSION: Patients report PTNS improves FI symptoms in the short term. Despite this improvement, changes in HRAM parameters were independent of this success. HRAM may be unable to measure the clinical effect of PTNS, or there remains the possibility of a placebo effect. Further work is required to define the role of PTNS in the treatment of FI.

Recto-anal Pressures in Constipated Men and Women Undergoing High-Resolution Anorectal Manometry.

BACKGROUND: In constipated individuals, high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRM) may suggest the presence of a defecatory disorder. Despite known physiological differences between men and women, our understanding of functional anorectal pathophysiology is based upon predominantly female cohorts. Results are generalized to men. AIMS: To evaluate whether recto-anal pressure patterns in constipated men are similar to those in constipated women. METHODS: The electronic health records at Mayo Clinic, Rochester were used to identify constipated adult patients, without organic anorectal disease, who had undergone HRM and balloon expulsion testing (BET) in 2018, 2019, and 2020. Comparative analyses were performed. RESULTS: Among 3,298 constipated adult patients (2,633 women, 665 men), anal and rectal pressures were higher in men. Women more likely to have HRM findings suggestive of a defecatory disorder (39% versus 20%, P < 0.001). Women were more likely to exhibit a type 4 pattern (27% versus 14%, P < 0.001), and less likely to exhibit a type 1 pattern (14% versus 38%, P < 0.001), of dyssynergia. Men were more likely to have an abnormal balloon expulsion test (BET, 34% versus 29%, P = 0.006). Nominal logistic regression demonstrates that male sex, age over 50 years, reduced recto-anal gradient during simulated evacuation, and types 2 and 4 dyssynergia are associated with an abnormal BET. CONCLUSIONS: In this large retrospective study, constipated men and women exhibited different patterns of dyssynergia both in the presence and absence of an abnormal BET. These findings were independent of sex-specific baseline physiological differences.

Clinical value of positive BET and pelvic floor dyssynergia in Chinese patients with functional defecation disorder.

BACKGROUND: Functional defecation disorder (FDD) is a common subtype of functional constipation (FC). Balloon expulsion test (BET) and high resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM) are significant tools but their results are not always consistent. AIMS: To investigate the characteristics of patients with positive BET and pelvic floor dyssynergia (PFD) and explore the value of both positive results in FDD diagnosis. METHODS: We retrospectively diagnosed FC subtypes and enrolled FDD patients based on Rome-IV criteria. They underwent HR-ARM, BET and CTT tests. Then they were classified to two groups and further stratified by FDD subtypes. Validated questionnaires were applied to investigate patients' constipation, anxiety/depression and quality of life. RESULTS: 335 FDD patients were finally enrolled. They were classified into two groups according to whether BET and PFD were both positive (consistent or not). 84.48% showed consistent results. These patients had significantly higher anal residual pressure, lower anal relaxation rate, manometric defecation index (MDI) and a more negative rectoanal pressure gradient (RAPG) (Ps < .05). The specific distribution of FDD phenotypes in two groups showed significant difference (p = .021). Males suffered a more negative RAPG (p < .001) and age was correlated with anal relaxation rate (p < .001). A subset (177 individuals) was investigated with validated questionnaires. Scores for Defecation Symptoms, Physical Discomfort and GAD-7 score were significantly high in Consistent Group (Ps < .05). GAD-7 score was associated with Defecation Symptoms (p < .001) while anal residual pressure, GAD-7 and Defecation Symptoms score were linked to Physical Discomfort (Ps < .05). The diagnostic specificity and PPV for FDD rose significantly with positive BET and PFD. CONCLUSION: FDD patients with positive BET and PFD suffered from severe defecation symptoms, anxiety and impaired QOL. Positive BET and PFD could be an ideal tool for screening FDD.

Redundancy in the International Anorectal Physiology Working Group Manometry Protocol: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study in Fecal Incontinence.

BACKGROUND: Anorectal manometry (ARM) is essential for identifying sphincteric dysfunction. The International Anorectal Physiology Working Group (IAPWG) protocol and London Classification provide a standardized format for performing and interpreting ARM. However, there is scant evidence to support timing and number of constituent maneuvers. AIMS: To assess the impact of protocol modification on diagnostic accuracy in patients with fecal incontinence. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of high-resolution ARM recordings from consecutive patients based on the current IAPWG protocol and modifications thereof: (1) baseline rest period (60 vs. 30 vs. 10 s); (2) number of abnormal short squeezes (SS) out of 3 (SS1/SS2/SS3) based on maximal incremental squeeze pressures over 5 s; (3) resting anal pressures (reflecting recovery) at 25-30 versus 15-20 s after SS1. RESULTS: One hundred patients (86 F, median age 55 [IQR: 39-65]; median St. Mark's incontinence score 14 [10-17]) were studied. 26% and 8% had anal hypotonia and hypertonia, respectively. Compared with 60-s resting pressure, measurements had perfect correlation (κ = 1.0) over 30 s, and substantial correlation (κ = 0.85) over 10 s. After SS1, SS2, and SS3, 43%, 49%, and 46% had anal hypocontractility, respectively. Correlation was substantial between SS1 and SS2 (κ = 0.799) and almost perfect between SS2 and SS3 (κ = 0.9). Compared to resting pressure of 5 s before SS1, pressure recordings at 25-30 and 15-20 s after SS1 were significantly correlated. CONCLUSIONS: A 30-s resting anal pressure, analysis of 2 short-squeezes with a 20-s between-maneuver recovery optimizes study duration without compromising diagnostic accuracy. These findings indicate the IAPWG protocol has redundancy.

Intra-subject Variability in High Resolution Anorectal Manometry Using the London Classification: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications.

This retrospective pilot study conducted on a community-based cohort of both men and women of various ages and underlying clinical presentations examined the durability and reproducibility of HR-ARM findings influencing their potential impact on clinical decision-making at the point of care (Jameson et al. in Br J Surg 81:1689-1692, 1994). The key finding of our study was that only a minority of patients who underwent repeat anorectal manometry as analyzed by the London Classification had stable manometric findings, raising questions regarding the validity of a single manometric measurement, as currently analyzed, for clinical decision-making.

Normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry in healthy young adults: evidence from Vietnam.

BACKGROUND: High-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) has been developed to improve measurement of anorectal functions. This study aims to identify normal HRAM values in healthy young Vietnamese adults. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study at the National Hospital of Traditional Medicine (Hanoi, Vietnam) from July through December 2014. Healthy young adults were invited to participate in the study. All anorectal measurement values were performed using the ISOLAB high-resolution manometry system. Differences between groups were analyzed using Student's t-tests. RESULTS: Thirty healthy young adults, including 15 males and 15 females aged 19-26 years, were recruited. Mean functional anal canal length was 3.4 ± 0.5 cm (range: 2.4-4.8 mm). Mean maximum resting pressure, mean maximum squeezing pressure, mean maximum coughing pressure, and mean maximum strain pressure were 65.5, 168.0, 125.9, and 84.2 mm Hg, respectively. All anal pressure values were significantly different between males and females. For rectal sensation measurements, only the volume at first sensation was significantly higher in males than in females. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides normal HRAM value for healthy young adults in Vietnam. Sex may influence anal pressure and first rectal sensation values in this cohort. Further studies should be conducted in order to improve the quality of HRAM normal values and to confirm the effects of sex.

Altered anal slow-wave pressure activity in low anterior resection syndrome: short case series in two independent specialist centres provide new mechanistic insights.

AIM: Conventional parameters (anal resting and squeeze pressures) measured with anorectal manometry (ARM) fail to identify anal sphincter dysfunction in many patients with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). We aimed to assess whether there are differences in anal canal slow-wave pressure activity in LARS patients and healthy individuals. METHOD: High-resolution ARM (HR-ARM) traces of 21 consecutive male LARS patients referred to the Royal London Hospital, UK (n = 12) and Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark (n = 9) were compared with HR-ARM data from 37 healthy men. RESULTS: Qualitatively (by visual inspection of HR-ARM recordings), the frequency of slow-wave pressure activity was strikingly different in 11/21 (52.4%) LARS patients from that observed in all the healthy individuals. Quantitative analysis showed that peaks of the mean spectrum in these 11 LARS patients occurred at approximately 6-7 cycles per minute (cpm), without activity at higher frequencies. An equivalent pattern was found in only 2/37 (5.4%) healthy individuals (P < 0.0001). Peaks of the mean spectrum in healthy individuals were concentrated at 16 cpm and 3-4 cpm. CONCLUSION: Over half of the male LARS patients studied had altered anal slow-wave pressure activity based on analysis of HR-ARM recordings. Further studies could investigate the relative contributions of sex, human baseline variance and neoadjuvant/surgical therapies on anal slow waves, and correlate the presence of abnormal activity with symptom severity.

Is the extent of obstetric anal sphincter injury correlated with the severity of fecal incontinence in the long term?

BACKGROUND: Obstetric anal sphincter injury is the most frequent cause of fecal incontinence (FI) in young women. However, the relationship between the extent of anal sphincter defects and the severity of long-term FI (at least 1 year after delivery) has been poorly studied. The aim of the present study was to determine if, in the long term, the extent of anal sphincter defects graded at anal endosonography was linked with the severity of FI. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on women with a history of vaginal delivery, who presented with FI and had three-dimensional anorectal high-resolution manometry and endoanal ultrasound in our center from January 2015 to 2016. The detailed clinical history of each patient was obtained from the institutional database. The severity of FI was assessed with the Jorge and Wexner continence scale. RESULTS: There were 250 women with a mean age of 60 ± 14 years. Seventy-six (30.4%) had an isolated defect of the internal anal sphincter, 21 (8.4%) had an isolated defect of the external anal sphincter, and 150 (60%) had both internal and external sphincter defects. The extent of IAS and EAS defects was proportionally correlated with the decrease in mean resting anal pressure (p < 0.01) and the decrease in mean squeeze pressure (p = 0.013) measured by 3DHRAM. No significant correlation was found between the extent and location of the defect (IAS, EAS or both) on endoanal ultrasound and the severity of FI. Menopause was the only independent factor significantly associated with the severity of FI. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, no significant correlation was observed between the extent of the anal sphincter defect and the severity of FI. Menopause was the only identified and independent risk factor for FI. These data confirm that, in the long-term, FI is often multifactorial.

Scientific solution to a complex problem: physiology and multidisciplinary team improve understanding and outcome in chronic constipation and faecal incontinence.

PURPOSE: There is a lack of diagnostic credibility to direct focused management for children with chronic constipation (CC) and faecal incontinence (FI). The aim is to assess the impact of an innovative Children's Anorectal Physiology Service (CAPS) focusing on improving outcomes in children with CC/FI. METHODS: Prospective data: demographics, bowel and quality of life (QoL)/risk of distress questionnaires. Diagnostics: awake high-resolution anorectal manometry (AHRAM), endoanal ultrasound and transit marker studies (TMS). RESULTS: Total patients: 112; 66 males (59%); median 9 years (17 months to 16 years). Patient groups included: 89 (79%) had functional CC/FI; 9 (8%), Hirschsprung's disease; 12 (11%), anorectal malformations and 2 (2%), trauma. St Marks Incontinence score (SMIS) abnormal in 91 (81%) and Cleveland Constipation Score (CCS) in 101 (90%) patients. Anorectal manometry: 94 (84%) awake and 18 (17%) under anaesthesia. Play specialist input 37 (33%) patients. AHRAM abnormal 65 (58%): sphincter dysfunction 36 (32%) and altered rectal sensation: hyposensitive 22% (20/91); 21% (19/91) hypersensitive. TMS normal in 64 (57%), 17 (15%) slow transit and 27 (24%) rectal evacuatory disorder. Risk of distress in 38% and poor QoL in 55% patients which correlated with abnormal SMIS (p = 0.02). Patient/parent satisfaction improved significantly (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Scientific investigations combined with multidisciplinary team improve patient satisfaction and reduces patient self-report illness severity. A complex problem requires a scientific solution.

3D high-resolution anorectal manometry selected case reports.

Presented selected case reports are focused on the individual cases of patients suffering from functional anorectal disorders. During the examination algorithm, the emphasis is on 3D high-resolution anorectal manometry, which is a useful diagnostic technique and helps to understand the pathophysiological mechanisms in the field of functional anorectal disorders. Thanks to a comprehensive examination an individualized treatment plan can be determined for each patient.

Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry in functional anorectal disorders: results from a large observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to describe the results of 3D high-resolution anorectal manometry (3DHRAM) in a large cohort of patients with functional anorectal disorders. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, all consecutive patients referred for investigation of fecal incontinence (FI) or dyssynergic defecation (DD) underwent 3DHRAM. The parameters analyzed were usual manometric data, repartition of dyssynergic patterns, and the prevalence of a new "muscular subtype classification" underlying dyssynergia, anal sphincter defects, and pelvic floor disorders. RESULTS: Final analyses were performed in 1477 patients with a mean age 54 ± 16 years; 825 patients suffered from DD, and 652 patients suffered from FI. Among these patients, 86% met the diagnostic criteria for dyssynergia. Type II dyssynergia was the most frequently observed (56%) in women and men suffering from FI and in women with DD. Type I was the most frequently observed in men with DD (49%). Regarding the muscle type subgroups, combined puborectalis muscle involvement with an external anal sphincter profile was the most frequently observed. The global prevalence of rectal intussusception and excessive perineal descent were 12% and 21%, respectively. Type III dyssynergia was more frequently associated with pelvic floor disorders than were other types of dyssynergia (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This large cohort study provides reference values for 3DHRAM in patients with functional anorectal disorders. Further studies are necessary to assess the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in healthy volunteers and to develop new scores and classifications including all of these new parameters.

Clinical benefit of high resolution anorectal manometry for the evaluation of anal function after intersphincteric resection.

AIM: Intersphincteric resection (ISR) is an advanced anus-preserving operation for treating low rectal cancer while avoiding colostomy. High-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM) allows objective and accurate evaluation of anal function. However, correlations between anal function after ISR and HR-ARM parameters are unknown. The aim of the study was to evaluate HR-ARM for objective evaluation of anal function after ISR. METHOD: A total of 81 patients who underwent ISR at our hospital between October 2014 and March 2016 were identified from our prospectively collected database and electronic medical records. Of these, 68 patients who had been evaluated using HR-ARM both before and after ISR were included in the study. Faecal incontinence (FI) was assessed by Wexner score. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine risk factors for severe FI after ISR. RESULTS: Maximum resting pressure (MRP) (P < 0.001) and maximum squeeze pressure (P = 0.04) were significantly lower after ISR, and MRP (P < 0.001) and maximum squeeze pressure (P = 0.02) were significantly lower after total (or subtotal) ISR than after partial ISR. The overall incidence of severe FI after ISR was 18% (12/68), and a high pressure zone before ISR ≤ 3 cm (P = 0.007) and MRP before ISR > 60 mmHg (P = 0.02) were independently associated with an elevated incidence of severe FI after ISR. Decreased preoperative MRP also correlated with severe FI after ISR (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: HR-ARM is reliable for the evaluation of anal function after ISR, and the high pressure zone and MRP may be useful preoperative predictors of severe FI after ISR.

Can wearing high heels influence anal canal pressure and the severity of fecal incontinence?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Wearing high heels may not only produce deleterious effects on the musculoskeletal system and on the general posture, but also on the activity of pelvic floor muscles. However, no data are currently available concerning the link between fecal incontinence and wearing high heels. Our aim was to determine whether wearing high-heeled shoes could influence anal canal pressure values in patients suffering from fecal incontinence. METHODS: In this retrospective monocentric study, 338 female patients were included. Clinical data, including the Wexner score, and manometric data were recorded (using 3D high-resolution anorectal manometry). Wearing high heels was defined by the use of high-heeled shoes at least four times a week for 4 consecutive hours with at least 1 year of usage time and heels ≥3 cm. Two sub-groups were defined: "high heels" vs "no high heels." RESULTS: The two subgroups were comparable for clinical data, including Wexner score, except for a higher age, menopause and hormone replacement therapy, and urinary incontinence in the group with "high heels." No statistical difference was observed concerning the anal canal pressure. Using analysis by logistic regression, only age was related to a significantly lower resting pressure. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective cohort of women with fecal incontinence, no clinical or manometric differences were observed between women who wore high heels versus those who did not. Because there is limited knowledge on this potential link and because the pelvic tilt may vary according to age and the habit of walking with high heels, further studies are necessary.

Diagnostic Role of Anal Sphincter Relaxation Integral in High-Resolution Anorectal Manometry for Hirschsprung Disease in Infants.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possible diagnostic role of anal sphincter relaxation integral (ASRI) in high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) for Hirschsprung disease. STUDY DESIGN: We performed conventional anorectal manometry (ARM) in 24 infants (8 with Hirschsprung disease and 16 without Hirschsprung disease) and HRAM in another 21 infants (9 with Hirschsprung disease and 12 without Hirschsprung disease) before and after October 2014. All infants underwent rectal suction biopsy for confirmation of Hirschsprung disease. We quantified rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) adequacy by calculating the ASRI in HRAM study at pressure cutoffs of less than 10, 15, and 20 mm Hg (ASRI10, ASRI15, and ASRI20, respectively) and investigated the diagnostic utility. RESULTS: Patients with Hirschsprung disease who underwent HRAM had significantly lower ASRI10, ASRI15, and ASRI20 values than did infants without Hirschsprung disease (P = .0002, .0002, and .0003, respectively), indicating significant difference in internal anal sphincter relaxation during RAIR test between these 2 groups. ASRI10 exhibited a greater diagnostic accuracy, area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity than did ASRI15 and ASRI20 for Hirschsprung disease. Moreover, the diagnostic accuracy of HRAM for Hirschsprung disease based on ASRI10 <7 mm Hg.s.cm was significantly greater than that of conventional ARM (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: ASRI10 may be indicative of the adequacy of RAIR by HRAM in infants, thus assisting the diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease. The diagnostic accuracy of HRAM (based on the ASRI10 value) is greater than that of conventional ARM for Hirschsprung disease. ASRI10 may be used in an automatic HRAM analysis system for the diagnosis of anorectal motility disorders.

New Metrics in High-Resolution and High-Definition Anorectal Manometry.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review recently published diagnostic methods that use high-resolution (HR-) or high-definition- (HD-) anorectal manometry (ARM) techniques. RECENT FINDINGS: The integrated pressurized volume (IPV) is a new measure based on spatiotemporal plots obtained from HR-ARM. The IPV may be clinically useful for improving the prediction of abnormal balloon expulsion test in patients with constipation and for discriminating patients with anorectal disorders from asymptomatic controls. Combination of IPV parameters was superior to conventional manometric parameters in predicting the responsiveness to biofeedback therapy. Moreover, several novel parameters including the HR-ARM resting integral, HR-ARM squeeze profile, and anorectal asymmetry index may each be useful as predictive factors for identifying patients with fecal incontinence. HR- and HD-ARM are increasingly performed worldwide for evaluation of anorectal function. Here, we describe new metrics whose clinical significance has not been fully established. Further standardization and validation of these metrics could provide clinically important new information and could help improve our understanding of the pathophysiology of anorectal disorders.

Diagnosis and Management of Fecal Incontinence.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to highlight current and newer therapeutic approaches to treat fecal incontinence in patients who do not respond to conservative measures. RECENT FINDINGS: Neurostimulation techniques, injection of bulking agents, and radiofrequency energy delivery to the anal canal have been proposed and tested for fecal incontinence over the last decade. Sacral stimulation is both effective and durable and is now the most popular of the invasive techniques whereas percutaneous tibial stimulation, radiofrequency energy, and bulking agents are either less effective or their evaluation has been handicapped by suboptimal study designs. The precise indications for the new vaginal control device and anal plugs remain to be established. The magnetic anal sphincter is disappointing. Stem cell therapy is a potentially exciting approach, which is in its infancy. There continues to be an unmet need for innovative approaches to patients with fecal incontinence who do not respond to conservative measures. The efficacy of current and future therapies should be assessed using criteria more stringent than has been used in the past to provide a more realistic assessment of meaningful efficacy.

[Normal values for solid state high resolution anorectal manometry in healthy adult volunteers].

Objective: To explore the normal values for two-dimension solid state high resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) in healthy adult volunteers. Methods: The healthy adult volunteers were recruited by advertisement and underwent solid state HRAM in the left lateral position. Anorectal pressures and rectal sensation were recorded and analyzed. Results: (1) A total of 126 Chinese healthy adult volunteers (male: 50 cases (39.7%); age: (37.5±14.2) years old ) were recruited in this study. (2) Mean anal resting pressure (MERP) was (71.8±17.3) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa). Maximum anal resting pressure (MARP) was (79.3±17.8) mmHg, Maximum anal squeeze pressure (MSP) was (178.7±52.8) mmHg. Anal high pressure zone (HPZ) length was (3.4±0.6) cm. During simulated evacuation, residual anal pressure (RAP) was (63.8±20.5) mmHg, and anal relaxation rate (ARR) was (37.0±11.5)%. Rectal threshold volume for first sensation (FST), desire to defecate (DDT), urgency to defecate (UDT) and maximum discomfort (MDT) was (47.4±10.0) ml, (84.5±18.2) ml, (125.8±28.5) ml, and (175.5±36.1) ml, respectively. (3) Compared with female subjects, male subjects had higher MSP[(211.0±50.7) mmHg vs (157.5±42.5) mmHg], RAP[(71.6±18.1) mmHg vs (58.8±20.5) mmHg]and rectal MDT[(187.0±36.4) mmHg vs (168.0±34.1)mmHg], but lower ARR[(32.1±8.0)% vs (40.2±12.3)%], all P<0.01. (4) MERP, MARP, MSP and rectal MDT were higher in young group (≤40 years old), all P<0.05. Conclusions: These observations provide normal values for two-dimension solid state HRAM, which have significant difference between genders and different age groups.