Off-the-Shelf Single-Fenestrated Endograft for Emergent Juxtarenal and Pararenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

INTRODUCTION: Endovascular solutions to emergent juxtarenal and pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are complicated. Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) with in situ laser fenestration (ISLF) is promising but requires a period of visceral ischemia. With an off-the-shelf, single superior mesenteric artery (SMA)-fenestrated device mesenteric ischemia is avoided and renal ischemia decreased. The aim was to develop an optimized design of such an endograft suitable for >90% of juxtarenal and pararenal AAAs. METHODS: Single-center analysis on 44 consecutive preoperative CTs for previously elective fenestrated EVARs for juxtarenal and pararenal aneurysms. Anatomical characteristics were analyzed to define: (1) shortest aortic coverage above SMA fenestration to achieve ≥4 cm seal; (2) feasibility of a scallop for the celiac artery; (3) shortest distance between the SMA and lowest renal, to facilitate renal ISLF in a straight endograft; (4) distance from the lowest renal to the aortic bifurcation, to allow an overlapping zone >40 mm with a bifurcated stent graft; (5) aortic diameter in the sealing zone, for optimal proximal stent graft diameter with 10% to 30% oversizing; (6) the final design was then tested on individual level. RESULTS: (1) The stent graft needs to start 40 mm above the SMA fenestration to achieve a 4 cm sealing zone in >90% of cases. (2) A proximal sealing zone of 40 mm without a scallop covers 77% of celiac arteries. With an addition of a 20 mm deep, 20 mm wide scallop at 12:30, the stent graft still covers 27% of celiacs. This suggests that a scallop would not be practically feasible. (3) In >90% of cases, the lowest renal was <31 mm from the SMA, suggesting that the tapering should start 30 mm below the SMA. (4) The distance from the lowest renal to the aortic bifurcation ranged from 82 to 166 mm. This allows for a 20 mm tapering and 50 mm straight part in all cases. (5) The 5th and 95th percentile of the aortic diameter in the sealing zone was 22 and 31 mm, respectively. Thus, 2 different stent graft diameters (28 and 34 mm) would fit >90% of cases. (6) The final design was suitable in 91% cases. CONCLUSIONS: Two sizes of a single-fenestrated aortic stent graft without scallop cover >90% of juxtarenal and pararenal anatomies. CLINICAL IMPACT: Emergent juxta- and pararenal aortic aneurysms is a difficult clinical scenario that continuously challenges physicians. An endovascular option is in situ laser fenestrated endografts. One risk with these is the complete visceral ischemia occurring before the fenestrations are completed. An off-the-shelf single-fenestrated stent graft facilitates the treatment by removing the ischemia time for the SMA and reducing the ischemia time for the celiac and renal arteries thus decreasing the risk of visceral ischemia complications.

[Endovascular management of chronic mesenteric ischemia : retrospective single-centre study]. / Prise en charge endovasculaire de l'ischémie mésentérique chronique : étude rétrospective monocentrique.

Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is a clinical entity linked to a gradual decrease in coelio-mesenteric arterial flow caused by occlusive disease of the digestive arterial axes. There are many etiologies of CMI, but most of the time atherosclerosis is the leading cause. Due to the development of collateral networks, clinical manifestations of CMI are very rare although some degree of stenosis of the digestive arteries is frequently found in asymptomatic elderly patients. Symptomatic CMI typically presents with the triad «post-meal abdominal pain - fear of eating - weight loss¼. Open surgical treatment was the gold standard for the management of symptomatic CMI since 1958. However, from 1980 and the introduction of endovascular treatment, percutaneous angioplasty combined with with stenting became the most common revascularization technique for CMI. The objective of this article is to report the results associated with endovascular therapy in patients with CMI at our hospital over the past 8 years.

L'ischémie mésentérique chronique (IMC) est une entité clinique rare liée à la diminution graduelle du flux artériel coelio-mésentérique causée par une maladie occlusive des axes artériels digestifs. De nombreuses étiologies de l'IMC existent, mais la plus fréquente est l'athérosclérose. En raison du développement de réseaux de vicariances, les manifestations cliniques de l'IMC sont rares, même en présence d'une lésion des troncs artériels digestifs. L'IMC symptomatique se présente par la triade classique de douleurs abdominales post-prandiales, sitiophobie (peur de se nourrir) et amaigrissement. La revascularisation chirurgicale était considérée comme le traitement de choix dans la prise en charge des patients symptomatiques depuis 1958, mais au prix d'une morbi-mortalité peropératoire non négligeable. À partir de l'introduction du traitement endovasculaire en 1980, cette procédure, combinant angioplastie percutanée et mise en place de stents, est devenue la technique de choix au vu de ses avantages en termes de morbi-mortalité et de durée de séjour. L'objectif de cet article est de rapporter les résultats associés à la prise en charge endovasculaire des patients atteints d'IMC au sein de notre institut au cours des 8 dernières années.

Endovascular Therapy for Nonischemic vs Ischemic Complicated Acute Type B Aortic Dissection.

Purpose: To report a single-center experience with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for complicated acute type B aortic dissection (cATBAD) comparing patients with vs without end-organ ischemia. Materials and Methods: Between November 2010 and December 2017, 64 patients (mean age 64.8±12.5 years; 49 men) underwent TEVAR for cATBAD. Patients were grouped into 2 cohorts: nonischemic (39, 61%) patients with unrelenting pain, early progressive aortic dilatation, uncontrolled hypertension, or rupture, and ischemic (25, 39%) patients with visceral, renal, lower extremity, or spinal cord hypoperfusion. Results: Mean time from diagnosis to treatment was 7.5 days (range 1-32) in the nonischemic group vs 2.3 days (range 1-14) days in the ischemic group (p=0.007). Fourteen (56%) of 25 ischemic cATBAD patients had stents implanted in the renovascular branch vessels, while 4 (16%) patients had stents implanted in the iliac arteries. When branch vessel cannulation failed, fenestrations were made in the intimal flap to improve perfusion of the involved branch (n=5). In the nonischemic group, 3 arteries were stented owing to atherosclerotic stenosis. Technical success was achieved in 62 (97%) of 64 patients; despite stenting, 2 patients had low renal artery perfusion on final angiography. There were no statistically significant differences in early or late outcomes between the nonischemic vs ischemic cATBAD patients. Six (9%) patients died within 30 days: 2 (5%) in the nonischemic group vs 4 (16%) in the ischemic group. Major complications (1 stroke, 2 cases of paraplegia, 1 retrograde type A dissection, and 1 case of bowel ischemia) occurred only in the nonischemic group. The mean follow-up was 28 months. Late endoleaks were observed in 3 (8%) nonischemic patients and 1 (4%) ischemic patient. Reinterventions were required in 7 (18%) nonischemic patients and 4 (16%) ischemic patients. Conclusion: TEVAR is an effective and safe method of treating cATBAD. Early intervention in ischemic cATBAD may have played a significant role in the lack of significant difference between ischemic and nonischemic cATBAD outcomes. Direct visceral reperfusion through branch vessel stenting during TEVAR may be crucial in achieving good outcomes in ischemic cATBAD.

Visceral oxidative stress during antegrade cerebral perfusion and lower body circulatory arrest.

Background: Antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) is the standard neuroprotection method in aortic surgery. Visceral ischemia during this modality brings out some controversies. We aimed to investigate the level of oxidative stress at the lower part of body during ACP. Methods: Thirty consecutive patients underwent elective ascending aorta and hemiarch repair with ACP (without distal perfusion) were enrolled to study. The patients were enrolled into two groups which were based on 50th percentile of ACP duration (15 patients in each group). Blood samples from inferior vena cava at the end of ACP were collected to assess oxidative stress with biochemical parameters such as lactate, advanced oxidative protein products (AOPP) and thiol levels. Clinical follow-up parameters regarding to visceral and spinal cord ischemia were recorded. There were no clinical complications at both groups. Results: Mean ACP duration for the study group was found to be 15 min (10-28 min). Lactate, AOPP, and thiol levels were found to be similar between two groups. Furthermore, correlation analysis revealed only low level of correlation between ACP duration and lactate levels. Renal and liver function tests were found to be similar between groups. Conclusions: Immediate parameters (such as lactate, AOPP, and thiol) that show alterations in response to oxidative stress were not affected by the duration of ACP. Therefore, ACP without distal perfusion may not be harmful when conducted for short duration.

Bilateral optic neuropathy, acral gangrene and visceral ischaemia as a rare presentation of calciphylaxis: A case report.

We report a case with calciphylaxis very rarely presenting with bilateral optic neuropathy, acral gangrene and visceral ischaemia. Bilateral papilloedaema was found in a 43 year-old female with chronic renal failure. Acral dry gangrene was observed. Pathological examination of her amputated thumb revealed calcification, thrombi, obstructive endovascular fibrotic areas in the walls of arteries. She was diagnosed with calciphylaxis. Bilateral optic neuropathy was defined secondary to calciphylaxis. Abdominal computerized tomography revealed prominent calcifications in mesenteric, spleen and renal arteries. She died eight months after the diagnosis. Calciphylaxis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of the optic neuropathy.

The Vascular Patient - Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia, AAA and Iliac Occlusion.

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD), abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and chronic mesenteric ischaemia (CMI) are vascular diseases uncommonly observed in the same patient, especially when treatment is required. This case report illustrates a patient requiring mesenteric revascularization due to CMI. A long flush occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) precluded endovascular revascularization. Therefore, we performed a retrograde bypass from the right common iliac artery (CIA) to the SMA. On the 6-month follow-up, the patient developed right limb ischemia despite the absence of intestinal angina. CT angiography revealed CIA occlusion, bypass patency through hypogastric retrograde filling and modest growth of a AAA. Due to the presence of contralateral CIA lesions and to achieve durable revascularization, we opted to perform a AAA repair with an aorto-uni-iliac endograft followed by a femorofemoral crossover bypass. This achieved AAA's repair, lower limb revascularization, and a suitable and durable inflow to the mesenteric bypass.

Visceral and renal protection in thoracoabdominal aortic surgery.

Ischemic renal failure and visceral ischemia are two serious complications of the surgery for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. The introduction of left atrial bypass, partial bypass, total circulatory arrest, and selective visceral perfusion has reduced the incidence of these complications over the past two decades. Yet these complications still persist, suggesting the sub-optimal nature of the available strategies.

The role of direct peritoneal resuscitation in the treatment of hemorrhagic shock after trauma and in emergency acute care surgery: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) has been used to help preserve microcirculation by reversing vasoconstriction and hypoperfusion associated with the pathophysiological process of shock, which can occur despite appropriate intravenous resuscitation. This approach depends on infusing a hyperosmolar solution intraperitoneally via a percutaneous catheter with the tip ending near the pelvis or the root of the mesentery. The abdomen is usually left open with a negative pressure abdominal dressing to continuously evacuate the infused dialysate. Hypertonicity of the solution triggers visceral vasodilation to help maintain blood flow, even during shock, and is also associated with reduced local inflammatory cytokines and other mediators, preservation of endothelial cell function, and mitigation of organ edema and necrosis. It also has a direct effect on liver perfusion and edema, more rapidly corrects electrolyte abnormalities compared to intravenous resuscitation alone, and may requireless intravenous fluid to stabilize blood pressure, all of which shortens the time required to close patients' abdomen. METHODS: An online query using the search term "direct peritoneal resuscitation" was carried out in PubMed, MEDLINE and SciELO, limited to publications indexed from January 2014 to June 2020. Of the 20 articles returned, full text was able to be obtained for 19. A manual review of included articles' references was resulted in the addition of 1 article, for a total of 20 included articles. RESULTS: The 20 articles were comprised of 15 animal studies, 4 clinical studies,and 1 expert opinion. The benefits include both local and possibly systemic effects on perfusion, hypoxia, acidosis, and inflammation, and are associated with improved outcomes and reduced complications. CONCLUSION: DPR shows promise in patients with hemorrhagic shock, septic shock, and other conditions resulting in an open abdomen after damage control laparotomy.

Monocentric case-series of mesenteric vascular disease occurred in the first month of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objectives: we describe Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) patients also manifesting gastro-intestinal symptoms. Methods: five women, between the ages of 32 and 82 years old, were admitted for acute abdomen, and received a nasopharyngeal swab for COVID-19 screening, lab test analysis, and contrast thoraco-abdominal CT-scan. All presented leukocytosis, different localizations of visceral vessels thrombosis and ischemia, and COVID-19. Results: emergency laparotomy was accepted by all but 1, who died after 5 days. Postoperatively, 1 died of multi-organ failure, 3 were discharged home after 14, 8 and 10 days respectively, under anti-platelet and anticoagulation treatment. Conclusions: in COVID-19 patients with acute abdomen, abdominal contrast CT-scans should be systematically extended to the thorax to detect visceral COVID-19 initial pulmonary signs. Emergency laparotomy and visceral arteries thrombectomy could be necessary.

Interdisciplinary Management of Visceral Artery Aneurysms and Visceral Artery Pseudoaneurysms.

The paper presents the results of treating 14 patients, namely eight patients with visceral artery aneurysms and six patients with visceral artery pseudoaneurysms. In 64.3% of the patients, the initial diagnosis was made based on the ultrasound examination. All the patients (100%) underwent CT angiography, while angiography was performed in 71.4% of the cases. Five (35.7%) patients with visceral artery pseudoaneurysms were emergently hospitalized; among them, the signs of bleeding were observed in 2 patients. In 9 patients, pathology was detected during tests for other conditions. Five (35.7%) patients underwent endovascular treatment, while 9 (64.3%) patients received surgical treatment. Endovascular interventions and open surgery demonstrated a nil mortality rate. After endovascular treatment, stent thrombosis was found in 1 patient. In the case of surgical treatment, visceral artery aneurysm was observed in 1 patient who underwent the resection of superior mesenteric artery pseudoaneurysm. Conclusions. The choice of the method of treating visceral artery aneurysms and visceral artery pseudoaneurysms depends on the location, size, anatomic features of the visceral arteries and the clinical course of the disease. Both endovascular and surgical treatment demonstrate good postoperative outcomes. Visceral ischemia is one of the most serious complications in the postoperative period, which can complicate both the diagnosis and the choice of treatment tactics.

Superior mesenteric artery plasty for type A acute aortic dissection with visceral ischemia.

Treatment of visceral ischemia complicated with acute type A aortic dissection is controversial. We had two cases of acute type A aortic dissection complicated by superior mesenteric artery (SMA) ischemia and successfully treated them with direct SMA perfusion during central aortic repair followed by SMA plasty. The presented procedures can be an option to treat visceral ischemia with a standard operative theater and equipment.

Direct Peritoneal Resuscitation: A review.

Conventional treatment for hemorrhagic shock includes the infusion of intravenous (IV) fluid and blood products in order to restore intravascular volume. However, even after normal heart rate and blood pressure are restored, the visceral organs often remain ischemic. This leads to organ dysfunction and also releases numerous cytokines and inflammatory mediators which activate the body's inflammatory response. The use of Direct Peritoneal Resuscitation (DPR) helps counteract this response. DPR involves infusion of hypertonic fluid into the abdomen in addition to IV resuscitation. This causes rapid and sustained dilation of the arterioles, especially those in the intestine, which reduces organ ischemia and cellular hypoxia. Studies in animals have demonstrated that use of DPR after hemorrhagic shock can reduce organ edema, improve liver blood flow, and reduce serum levels of inflammatory cytokines. Subsequent human studies have shown that DPR after damage control surgery for hemorrhage or sepsis leads to faster abdominal closure, higher rate of primary fascial closure, and reduced abdominal complications. Peritoneal resuscitation has also shown benefits in the resuscitation after acute brain death, including reduced inflammatory mediators and organ edema. Use of DPR in potential organ donors leads to an increase in the number of organs procured per donor, most frequently by increasing the number of lungs procured.

Delayed visceral ischemia induced by type B aortic dissection.

Case: A 56-year-old man presented with a sudden severe abdominal pain 13 days after the onset of type B acute aortic dissection. Chest computed tomography revealed type B aortic dissection, and the true lumen was narrowed by the expanding false lumen. Blood flow through the celiac trunk, superior mesenteric artery, and left renal artery was reduced. Blood flow through the distal abdominal aorta and bilateral femoral arteries was clearly recognized. Laboratory findings such as transaminases were rapidly worsening. Outcome: The patient underwent emergency fenestration of the abdominal aorta and recovered without organ failure. Conclusions: Rapidly worsening laboratory findings led us to emergency operation with successful results. Serial monitoring of laboratory findings is the key for adequate timing of operation.

Renal and abdominal visceral complications after open aortic surgery requiring supra-renal aortic cross clamping.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess renal or abdominal visceral complications after open aortic surgery (OAS) requiring supra-renal aortic cross clamping (SRACC). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 66 patients who underwent SRACC. Among them, 17 followed supra-celiac aortic cross clamping (SCACC) procedure, 42 supra-renal, and 7 inter-renal aorta. Postoperative renal, hepatic or pancreatic complications were investigated by reviewing levels of serum creatinine and hepatic and pancreatic enzymes. Preoperative clinical and operative variables were analyzed to determine risk factors for postoperative renal insufficiency (PORI). RESULTS: Indications for SRACC were 25 juxta-renal aortic occlusion and 41 aortic aneurysms (24 juxta-renal, 12 supra-renal and 5 type IV thoraco-abdominal). The mean duration of renal ischemic time (RIT) was 30.1 ± 22.2 minutes (range, 3 to 120 minutes). PORI developed in 21% of patients, including four patients requiring hemodialysis (HD). However, chronic HD was required for only one patient (1.5%) who had preoperative renal insufficiency. RIT ≥ 25 minutes and SCACC were significant risk factors for PORI development by univariate analysis, but not by multivariate analysis. Serum pancreatic and hepatic enzyme was elevated in 41% and 53% of the 17 patients who underwent SCACC, respectively. CONCLUSION: Though postoperative renal or abdominal visceral complications developed often after SRACC, we found that most of those complications resolved spontaneously unless there was preexisting renal disease or the aortic clamping time was exceptionally long.