ABSTRACT
The integration of mass spectrometry-based proteomics with next-generation DNA and RNA sequencing profiles tumors more comprehensively. Here this "proteogenomics" approach was applied to 122 treatment-naive primary breast cancers accrued to preserve post-translational modifications, including protein phosphorylation and acetylation. Proteogenomics challenged standard breast cancer diagnoses, provided detailed analysis of the ERBB2 amplicon, defined tumor subsets that could benefit from immune checkpoint therapy, and allowed more accurate assessment of Rb status for prediction of CDK4/6 inhibitor responsiveness. Phosphoproteomics profiles uncovered novel associations between tumor suppressor loss and targetable kinases. Acetylproteome analysis highlighted acetylation on key nuclear proteins involved in the DNA damage response and revealed cross-talk between cytoplasmic and mitochondrial acetylation and metabolism. Our results underscore the potential of proteogenomics for clinical investigation of breast cancer through more accurate annotation of targetable pathways and biological features of this remarkably heterogeneous malignancy.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinogenesis/genetics , Carcinogenesis/pathology , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Proteogenomics , APOBEC Deaminases/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/immunology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Cohort Studies , DNA Damage , DNA Repair , Female , Humans , Immunotherapy , Metabolomics , Middle Aged , Mutagenesis/genetics , Phosphorylation , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Protein Kinases/metabolism , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Retinoblastoma Protein/metabolism , Tumor Microenvironment/immunologyABSTRACT
Programmable nucleases and deaminases, which include zinc-finger nucleases, transcription activator-like effector nucleases, CRISPR RNA-guided nucleases, and RNA-guided base editors, are now widely employed for the targeted modification of genomes in cells and organisms. These gene-editing tools hold tremendous promise for therapeutic applications. Importantly, these nucleases and deaminases may display off-target activity through the recognition of near-cognate DNA sequences to their target sites, resulting in collateral damage to the genome in the form of local mutagenesis or genomic rearrangements. For therapeutic genome-editing applications with these classes of programmable enzymes, it is essential to measure and limit genome-wide off-target activity. Herein, we discuss the key determinants of off-target activity for these systems. We describe various cell-based and cell-free methods for identifying genome-wide off-target sites and diverse strategies that have been developed for reducing the off-target activity of programmable gene-editing enzymes.
Subject(s)
CRISPR-Associated Protein 9/genetics , CRISPR-Cas Systems , Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats , Gene Editing/methods , Protein Engineering/methods , RNA, Guide, Kinetoplastida/genetics , APOBEC Deaminases/genetics , APOBEC Deaminases/metabolism , Adenosine Deaminase/genetics , Adenosine Deaminase/metabolism , Artifacts , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Proteins/metabolism , CRISPR-Associated Protein 9/metabolism , Endonucleases/genetics , Endonucleases/metabolism , Escherichia coli Proteins/genetics , Escherichia coli Proteins/metabolism , Gene Transfer Techniques , Genome, Human , Humans , Isoenzymes/genetics , Isoenzymes/metabolism , RNA, Guide, Kinetoplastida/metabolism , SoftwareABSTRACT
Multiple signatures of somatic mutations have been identified in cancer genomes. Exome sequences of 1,001 human cancer cell lines and 577 xenografts revealed most common mutational signatures, indicating past activity of the underlying processes, usually in appropriate cancer types. To investigate ongoing patterns of mutational-signature generation, cell lines were cultured for extended periods and subsequently DNA sequenced. Signatures of discontinued exposures, including tobacco smoke and ultraviolet light, were not generated in vitro. Signatures of normal and defective DNA repair and replication continued to be generated at roughly stable mutation rates. Signatures of APOBEC cytidine deaminase DNA-editing exhibited substantial fluctuations in mutation rate over time with episodic bursts of mutations. The initiating factors for the bursts are unclear, although retrotransposon mobilization may contribute. The examined cell lines constitute a resource of live experimental models of mutational processes, which potentially retain patterns of activity and regulation operative in primary human cancers.
Subject(s)
APOBEC Deaminases/genetics , Neoplasms/genetics , APOBEC Deaminases/metabolism , Cell Line , Cell Line, Tumor , DNA/metabolism , DNA Mutational Analysis/methods , Databases, Genetic , Exome , Genome, Human/genetics , Heterografts , Humans , Mutagenesis , Mutation/genetics , Mutation Rate , Retroelements , Exome Sequencing/methodsABSTRACT
Many processes can cause the same nucleotide change in a genome, making the identification of the mechanisms causing mutations a difficult challenge. Here, we show that clustered mutations provide a more precise fingerprint of mutagenic processes. Of nine clustered mutation signatures identified from >1,000 tumor genomes, three relate to variable APOBEC activity and three are associated with tobacco smoking. An additional signature matches the spectrum of translesion DNA polymerase eta (POLH). In lymphoid cells, these mutations target promoters, consistent with AID-initiated somatic hypermutation. In solid tumors, however, they are associated with UV exposure and alcohol consumption and target the H3K36me3 chromatin of active genes in a mismatch repair (MMR)-dependent manner. These regions normally have a low mutation rate because error-free MMR also targets H3K36me3 chromatin. Carcinogens and error-prone repair therefore redistribute mutations to the more important regions of the genome, contributing a substantial mutation load in many tumors, including driver mutations.
Subject(s)
DNA Mismatch Repair , Mutation , Neoplasms/genetics , APOBEC Deaminases , Cytidine Deaminase , Cytosine Deaminase/genetics , DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/genetics , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/chemically induced , Liver Neoplasms/genetics , Melanoma/genetics , Mutagenesis , Smoking/adverse effects , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Mutations accumulate in the genome of every cell of the body throughout life, causing cancer and other diseases1,2. Most mutations begin as nucleotide mismatches or damage in one of the two strands of the DNA before becoming double-strand mutations if unrepaired or misrepaired3,4. However, current DNA-sequencing technologies cannot accurately resolve these initial single-strand events. Here we develop a single-molecule, long-read sequencing method (Hairpin Duplex Enhanced Fidelity sequencing (HiDEF-seq)) that achieves single-molecule fidelity for base substitutions when present in either one or both DNA strands. HiDEF-seq also detects cytosine deamination-a common type of DNA damage-with single-molecule fidelity. We profiled 134 samples from diverse tissues, including from individuals with cancer predisposition syndromes, and derive from them single-strand mismatch and damage signatures. We find correspondences between these single-strand signatures and known double-strand mutational signatures, which resolves the identity of the initiating lesions. Tumours deficient in both mismatch repair and replicative polymerase proofreading show distinct single-strand mismatch patterns compared to samples that are deficient in only polymerase proofreading. We also define a single-strand damage signature for APOBEC3A. In the mitochondrial genome, our findings support a mutagenic mechanism occurring primarily during replication. As double-strand DNA mutations are only the end point of the mutation process, our approach to detect the initiating single-strand events at single-molecule resolution will enable studies of how mutations arise in a variety of contexts, especially in cancer and ageing.
Subject(s)
Base Pair Mismatch , DNA Damage , DNA, Single-Stranded , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Single Molecule Imaging , Humans , Aging/genetics , APOBEC Deaminases/genetics , APOBEC Deaminases/metabolism , Base Pair Mismatch/genetics , Cytidine Deaminase/metabolism , Cytidine Deaminase/genetics , Cytosine/metabolism , Deamination , DNA Damage/genetics , DNA Mismatch Repair/genetics , DNA Replication/genetics , DNA, Single-Stranded/genetics , Genome, Mitochondrial/genetics , Mutation , Neoplasms/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , Sequence Analysis, DNA/standards , Single Molecule Imaging/methods , Male , FemaleABSTRACT
Metastatic cancer remains an almost inevitably lethal disease1-3. A better understanding of disease progression and response to therapies therefore remains of utmost importance. Here we characterize the genomic differences between early-stage untreated primary tumours and late-stage treated metastatic tumours using a harmonized pan-cancer analysis (or reanalysis) of two unpaired primary4 and metastatic5 cohorts of 7,108 whole-genome-sequenced tumours. Metastatic tumours in general have a lower intratumour heterogeneity and a conserved karyotype, displaying only a modest increase in mutations, although frequencies of structural variants are elevated overall. Furthermore, highly variable tumour-specific contributions of mutational footprints of endogenous (for example, SBS1 and APOBEC) and exogenous mutational processes (for example, platinum treatment) are present. The majority of cancer types had either moderate genomic differences (for example, lung adenocarcinoma) or highly consistent genomic portraits (for example, ovarian serous carcinoma) when comparing early-stage and late-stage disease. Breast, prostate, thyroid and kidney renal clear cell carcinomas and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours are clear exceptions to the rule, displaying an extensive transformation of their genomic landscape in advanced stages. Exposure to treatment further scars the tumour genome and introduces an evolutionary bottleneck that selects for known therapy-resistant drivers in approximately half of treated patients. Our data showcase the potential of pan-cancer whole-genome analysis to identify distinctive features of late-stage tumours and provide a valuable resource to further investigate the biological basis of cancer and resistance to therapies.
Subject(s)
Genome, Human , Genomics , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Male , Disease Progression , Mutation , Neoplasm Metastasis/genetics , Neoplasms/genetics , Genome, Human/genetics , Cohort Studies , Karyotyping , APOBEC Deaminases/metabolismABSTRACT
The APOBEC3 family of cytosine deaminases has been implicated in some of the most prevalent mutational signatures in cancer1-3. However, a causal link between endogenous APOBEC3 enzymes and mutational signatures in human cancer genomes has not been established, leaving the mechanisms of APOBEC3 mutagenesis poorly understood. Here, to investigate the mechanisms of APOBEC3 mutagenesis, we deleted implicated genes from human cancer cell lines that naturally generate APOBEC3-associated mutational signatures over time4. Analysis of non-clustered and clustered signatures across whole-genome sequences from 251 breast, bladder and lymphoma cancer cell line clones revealed that APOBEC3A deletion diminished APOBEC3-associated mutational signatures. Deletion of both APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B further decreased APOBEC3 mutation burdens, without eliminating them. Deletion of APOBEC3B increased APOBEC3A protein levels, activity and APOBEC3A-mediated mutagenesis in some cell lines. The uracil glycosylase UNG was required for APOBEC3-mediated transversions, whereas the loss of the translesion polymerase REV1 decreased overall mutation burdens. Together, these data represent direct evidence that endogenous APOBEC3 deaminases generate prevalent mutational signatures in human cancer cells. Our results identify APOBEC3A as the main driver of these mutations, indicate that APOBEC3B can restrain APOBEC3A-dependent mutagenesis while contributing its own smaller mutation burdens and dissect mechanisms that translate APOBEC3 activities into distinct mutational signatures.
Subject(s)
APOBEC Deaminases , Mutagenesis , Neoplasms , APOBEC Deaminases/deficiency , APOBEC Deaminases/genetics , APOBEC Deaminases/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/metabolism , Gene Deletion , Genome, Human , Humans , Mutagenesis/genetics , Neoplasms/enzymology , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/pathology , Uracil-DNA Glycosidase/metabolismABSTRACT
Clustered somatic mutations are common in cancer genomes and previous analyses reveal several types of clustered single-base substitutions, which include doublet- and multi-base substitutions1-5, diffuse hypermutation termed omikli6, and longer strand-coordinated events termed kataegis3,7-9. Here we provide a comprehensive characterization of clustered substitutions and clustered small insertions and deletions (indels) across 2,583 whole-genome-sequenced cancers from 30 types of cancer10. Clustered mutations were highly enriched in driver genes and associated with differential gene expression and changes in overall survival. Several distinct mutational processes gave rise to clustered indels, including signatures that were enriched in tobacco smokers and homologous-recombination-deficient cancers. Doublet-base substitutions were caused by at least 12 mutational processes, whereas most multi-base substitutions were generated by either tobacco smoking or exposure to ultraviolet light. Omikli events, which have previously been attributed to APOBEC3 activity6, accounted for a large proportion of clustered substitutions; however, only 16.2% of omikli matched APOBEC3 patterns. Kataegis was generated by multiple mutational processes, and 76.1% of all kataegic events exhibited mutational patterns that are associated with the activation-induced deaminase (AID) and APOBEC3 family of deaminases. Co-occurrence of APOBEC3 kataegis and extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA), termed kyklonas (Greek for cyclone), was found in 31% of samples with ecDNA. Multiple distinct kyklonic events were observed on most mutated ecDNA. ecDNA containing known cancer genes exhibited both positive selection and kyklonic hypermutation. Our results reveal the diversity of clustered mutational processes in human cancer and the role of APOBEC3 in recurrently mutating and fuelling the evolution of ecDNA.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms , APOBEC Deaminases/genetics , Genome , Humans , INDEL Mutation , Mutagenesis/genetics , Mutation , Neoplasms/geneticsABSTRACT
To replicate in their hosts, viruses have to navigate the complexities of the mammalian cell, co-opting mechanisms of cellular physiology while defeating restriction factors that are dedicated to halting their progression. Primate lentiviruses devote a relatively large portion of their coding capacity to counteracting restriction factors by encoding accessory proteins dedicated to neutralizing the antiviral function of these intracellular inhibitors. Research into the roles of the accessory proteins has revealed the existence of previously undetected intrinsic defenses, provided insight into the evolution of primate lentiviruses as they adapt to new species and uncovered new targets for the development of therapeutics. This Review discusses the biology of the restriction factors APOBEC3, SAMHD1 and tetherin and the viral accessory proteins that counteract them.
Subject(s)
Antigens, CD/metabolism , Cytosine Deaminase/metabolism , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV-1/physiology , Host Specificity , Immune Evasion , Monomeric GTP-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Viral Regulatory and Accessory Proteins/metabolism , APOBEC Deaminases , Animals , Biological Evolution , Cytidine Deaminase , GPI-Linked Proteins/metabolism , HIV Infections/virology , Humans , Molecular Targeted Therapy , SAM Domain and HD Domain-Containing Protein 1ABSTRACT
Long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1 or L1) retrotransposition poses a threat to genome integrity, and cells have evolved mechanisms to restrict retrotransposition. However, how cellular proteins facilitate L1 retrotransposition requires elucidation. Here, we demonstrate that single-strand DNA breaks induced by the L1 endonuclease trigger the recruitment of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 2 (PARP2) to L1 integration sites and that PARP2 activation leads to the subsequent recruitment of the replication protein A (RPA) complex to facilitate retrotransposition. We further demonstrate that RPA directly binds activated PARP2 through poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation and can protect single-strand L1 integration intermediates from APOBEC3-mediated cytidine deamination in vitro. Paradoxically, we provide evidence that RPA can guide APOBEC3A, and perhaps other APOBEC3 proteins, to sites of L1 integration. Thus, the interplay of L1-encoded and evolutionarily conserved cellular proteins is required for efficient retrotransposition; however, these interactions also may be exploited to restrict L1 retrotransposition in the human genome.
Subject(s)
Long Interspersed Nucleotide Elements , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases/metabolism , Replication Protein A/metabolism , APOBEC Deaminases , Animals , CHO Cells , Cricetulus , Cytidine Deaminase/genetics , Cytidine Deaminase/metabolism , HEK293 Cells , HeLa Cells , Humans , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases/genetics , Protein Binding , Replication Protein A/geneticsABSTRACT
The apolipoprotein B messenger RNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide (APOBEC) family is composed of nucleic acid editors with roles ranging from antibody diversification to RNA editing. APOBEC2, a member of this family with an evolutionarily conserved nucleic acid-binding cytidine deaminase domain, has neither an established substrate nor function. Using a cellular model of muscle differentiation where APOBEC2 is inducibly expressed, we confirmed that APOBEC2 does not have the attributed molecular functions of the APOBEC family, such as RNA editing, DNA demethylation, and DNA mutation. Instead, we found that during muscle differentiation APOBEC2 occupied a specific motif within promoter regions; its removal from those regions resulted in transcriptional changes. Mechanistically, these changes reflect the direct interaction of APOBEC2 with histone deacetylase (HDAC) transcriptional corepressor complexes. We also found that APOBEC2 could bind DNA directly, in a sequence-specific fashion, suggesting that it functions as a recruiter of HDAC to specific genes whose promoters it occupies. These genes are normally suppressed during muscle cell differentiation, and their suppression may contribute to the safeguarding of muscle cell fate. Altogether, our results reveal a unique role for APOBEC2 within the APOBEC family.
Subject(s)
Chromatin , Muscle Proteins , APOBEC Deaminases/genetics , APOBEC-1 Deaminase/genetics , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Chromatin/genetics , Cytidine Deaminase/metabolism , DNA , Muscle Fibers, Skeletal/metabolism , Muscle Proteins/metabolism , Myoblasts/metabolism , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Animals , MiceABSTRACT
Human APOBEC3 enzymes are a family of single-stranded (ss)DNA and RNA cytidine deaminases that act as part of the intrinsic immunity against viruses and retroelements. These enzymes deaminate cytosine to form uracil which can functionally inactivate or cause degradation of viral or retroelement genomes. In addition, APOBEC3s have deamination-independent antiviral activity through protein and nucleic acid interactions. If expression levels are misregulated, some APOBEC3 enzymes can access the human genome leading to deamination and mutagenesis, contributing to cancer initiation and evolution. While APOBEC3 enzymes are known to interact with large ribonucleoprotein complexes, the function and RNA dependence are not entirely understood. To further understand their cellular roles, we determined by affinity purification mass spectrometry (AP-MS) the protein interaction network for the human APOBEC3 enzymes and mapped a diverse set of protein-protein and protein-RNA mediated interactions. Our analysis identified novel RNA-mediated interactions between APOBEC3C, APOBEC3H Haplotype I and II, and APOBEC3G with spliceosome proteins, and APOBEC3G and APOBEC3H Haplotype I with proteins involved in tRNA methylation and ncRNA export from the nucleus. In addition, we identified RNA-independent protein-protein interactions with APOBEC3B, APOBEC3D, and APOBEC3F and the prefoldin family of protein-folding chaperones. Interaction between prefoldin 5 (PFD5) and APOBEC3B disrupted the ability of PFD5 to induce degradation of the oncogene cMyc, implicating the APOBEC3B protein interaction network in cancer. Altogether, the results uncover novel functions and interactions of the APOBEC3 family and suggest they may have fundamental roles in cellular RNA biology, their protein-protein interactions are not redundant, and there are protein-protein interactions with tumor suppressors, suggesting a role in cancer biology. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with the identifier PXD044275.
Subject(s)
Cytidine Deaminase , Protein Interaction Maps , Humans , Cytidine Deaminase/metabolism , Cytidine Deaminase/genetics , Deamination , APOBEC Deaminases/metabolism , Aminohydrolases/metabolism , Aminohydrolases/genetics , HEK293 Cells , Cytosine Deaminase/metabolism , APOBEC-3G Deaminase/metabolism , APOBEC-3G Deaminase/genetics , Spliceosomes/metabolism , Protein Binding , Mass Spectrometry , RNA/metabolism , Minor Histocompatibility Antigens/metabolism , Minor Histocompatibility Antigens/geneticsABSTRACT
Over the past decade, the connection between APOBEC3 cytosine deaminases and cancer mutagenesis has become increasingly apparent. This growing awareness has created a need for biochemical tools that can be used to identify and characterize potential inhibitors of this enzyme family. In response to this challenge, we have developed a Real-time APOBEC3-mediated DNA Deamination assay. This assay offers a single-step set-up and real-time fluorescent read-out, and it is capable of providing insights into enzyme kinetics. The assay also offers a high-sensitivity and easily scalable method for identifying APOBEC3 inhibitors. This assay serves as a crucial addition to the existing APOBEC3 biochemical and cellular toolkit and possesses the versatility to be readily adapted into a high-throughput format for inhibitor discovery.
Subject(s)
Cytidine Deaminase , DNA , Humans , Deamination , Cytidine Deaminase/metabolism , DNA/metabolism , DNA/chemistry , Kinetics , APOBEC Deaminases/metabolism , Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacologyABSTRACT
Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) initiates both class switch recombination (CSR) and somatic hypermutation (SHM) in antibody diversification. Mechanisms of AID targeting and catalysis remain elusive despite its critical immunological roles and off-target effects in tumorigenesis. Here, we produced active human AID and revealed its preferred recognition and deamination of structured substrates. G-quadruplex (G4)-containing substrates mimicking the mammalian immunoglobulin switch regions are particularly good AID substrates in vitro. By solving crystal structures of maltose binding protein (MBP)-fused AID alone and in complex with deoxycytidine monophosphate, we surprisingly identify a bifurcated substrate-binding surface that explains structured substrate recognition by capturing two adjacent single-stranded overhangs simultaneously. Moreover, G4 substrates induce cooperative AID oligomerization. Structure-based mutations that disrupt bifurcated substrate recognition or oligomerization both compromise CSR in splenic B cells. Collectively, our data implicate intrinsic preference of AID for structured substrates and uncover the importance of G4 recognition and oligomerization of AID in CSR.
Subject(s)
Cytidine Deaminase/metabolism , DNA/metabolism , Immunoglobulin Class Switching , Immunoglobulin Switch Region , Recombination, Genetic , APOBEC Deaminases/genetics , APOBEC Deaminases/metabolism , Animals , Antibody Diversity , B-Lymphocytes/enzymology , B-Lymphocytes/immunology , Cytidine Deaminase/chemistry , Cytidine Deaminase/genetics , DNA/chemistry , DNA/genetics , Humans , Mice , Models, Molecular , Mutation , Nucleic Acid Conformation , Protein Binding , Protein Conformation , Spleen/enzymology , Spleen/immunology , Structure-Activity Relationship , Substrate SpecificityABSTRACT
APOBEC proteins can deaminate cytosine residues in DNA and RNA. This can lead to somatic mutations, DNA breaks, RNA modifications, or DNA demethylation in a selective manner. APOBECs function in various cellular compartments and recognize different nucleic acid motifs and structures. They orchestrate a wide array of genomic and epigenomic modifications, thereby affecting various cellular functions positively or negatively, including immune editing, viral and retroelement restriction, DNA damage responses, DNA demethylation, gene expression, and tissue homeostasis. Furthermore, the cumulative increase in genomic and epigenomic editing with aging could also, at least in part, be attributed to APOBEC function. We synthesize our cumulative understanding of APOBEC activity in a unifying overview and discuss their genomic and epigenomic impact in physiological, pathological, and technological contexts.
Subject(s)
APOBEC Deaminases , Epigenomics , APOBEC Deaminases/genetics , APOBEC Deaminases/metabolism , Cytidine Deaminase/genetics , Cytidine Deaminase/metabolism , Genome , Genomics , RetroelementsABSTRACT
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has triggered an unprecedented international effort to sequence complete viral genomes. We leveraged this wealth of information to characterize the substitution spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 and to compare it with those of other human and animal coronaviruses. We show that, once nucleotide composition is taken into account, human and most animal coronaviruses display a mutation spectrum dominated by C to U and G to U substitutions, a feature that is not shared by other positive-sense RNA viruses. However, the proportions of C to U and G to U substitutions tend to decrease as divergence increases, suggesting that, whatever their origin, a proportion of these changes is subsequently eliminated by purifying selection. Analysis of the sequence context of C to U substitutions showed little evidence of apolipoprotein B mRNA editing catalytic polypeptide-like (APOBEC)-mediated editing and such contexts were similar for SARS-CoV-2 and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus sampled from different hosts, despite different repertoires of APOBEC3 proteins in distinct species. Conversely, we found evidence that C to U and G to U changes affect CpG dinucleotides at a frequency higher than expected. Whereas this suggests ongoing selective reduction of CpGs, this effect alone cannot account for the substitution spectra. Finally, we show that, during the first months of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic spread, the frequency of both G to U and C to U substitutions increased. Our data suggest that the substitution spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 is determined by an interplay of factors, including intrinsic biases of the replication process, avoidance of CpG dinucleotides and other constraints exerted by the new host.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/genetics , Evolution, Molecular , Genome, Viral , Mutation , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , APOBEC Deaminases/genetics , APOBEC Deaminases/metabolism , Animals , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Phylogeny , SARS-CoV-2/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic polypeptide-like 2 (APOBEC2) is associated with nucleotide alterations in the transcripts of tumor-related genes which are contributed to carcinogenesis. Expression and prognosis value of APOBEC2 in stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) remains unclear. METHODS: The APOBEC2 gene alteration frequency of STAD and APOBEC2 gene expression in STAD and normal tissues were investigated in cBioportal and GEPIA, respectively. We detected expression of APOBEC2, infiltration of CD66b+ tumor-associated neutrophils and CD163+ tumor-associated macrophages in tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry. APOBEC2 gene expression was explored by western blot and qRT-PCR. Relationships between APOBEC2 and CD66b, CD163, and other clinicopathological characteristics were investigated. Associations among APOBEC2 expression status and patient survival outcome were further analyzed. RESULTS: APOBEC2 gene alteration frequency was 5%, and APOBEC2 gene was downexpressed in STAD compared to normal tissues (P < 0.05). APOBEC2 expression status were associated with the infiltration of CD66b+ TANs, differentiation grade, TNM stage, histological type and gender (all P < 0.05) in STAD. Little or no APOBEC2 expression was detected in STAD and adjacent normal tissues by western blot. We failed to show that APOBEC2 was an independent risk factor for OS (Hazard Ratio 0.816, 95%CI 0.574-1.161, P = 0.259) or DFS (Hazard Ratio 0.821, 95%CI 0.578-1.166, P = 0.270) in STAD by multivariate Cox regression analysis, but APOBEC2 negative subgroup has a worse OS and DFS among patients with adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: APOBEC2 correlates with CD66b, differentiation grade, TNM stages, histological classification, and gender in STAD. APOBEC2 is not an independent prognostic factor for STAD, our results suggest that patients with positive APOBEC2 can benefit from postoperative chemotherapy, and combination of APOBEC2 and CD66b is helpful to further stratify patients into different groups with distinct prognoses.
Subject(s)
APOBEC Deaminases , Adenocarcinoma , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , APOBEC Deaminases/metabolism , Muscle Proteins , Neutrophils/pathology , Nucleotides/metabolism , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Stomach Neoplasms/metabolismABSTRACT
In mammals, RNA editing events involve the conversion of adenosine (A) in inosine (I) by ADAR enzymes or the hydrolytic deamination of cytosine (C) in uracil (U) by the APOBEC family of enzymes, mostly APOBEC1. RNA editing has a plethora of biological functions, and its deregulation has been associated with various human disorders. While the large-scale detection of A-to-I is quite straightforward using the Illumina RNAseq technology, the identification of C-to-U events is a non-trivial task. This difficulty arises from the rarity of such events in eukaryotic genomes and the challenge of distinguishing them from background noise. Direct RNA sequencing by Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) permits the direct detection of Us on sequenced RNA reads. Surprisingly, using ONT reads from wild-type (WT) and APOBEC1-knock-out (KO) murine cell lines as well as in vitro synthesized RNA without any modification, we identified a systematic error affecting the accuracy of the Cs call, thereby leading to incorrect identifications of C-to-U events. To overcome this issue in direct RNA reads, here we introduce a novel machine learning strategy based on the isolation Forest (iForest) algorithm in which C-to-U editing events are considered as sequencing anomalies. Using in vitro synthesized and human ONT reads, our model optimizes the signal-to-noise ratio improving the detection of C-to-U editing sites with high accuracy, over 90% in all samples tested. Our results suggest that iForest, known for its rapid implementation and minimal memory requirements, is a promising tool to denoise ONT reads and reliably identify RNA modifications.
Subject(s)
RNA Editing , RNA , Mice , Animals , Humans , RNA/genetics , Base Sequence , APOBEC Deaminases/genetics , Mammals/genetics , Sequence Analysis, RNAABSTRACT
The human APOBEC family of eleven cytosine deaminases use RNA and single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) as substrates to deaminate cytosine to uracil. This deamination event has roles in lipid metabolism by altering mRNA coding, adaptive immunity by causing evolution of antibody genes, and innate immunity through inactivation of viral genomes. These benefits come at a cost where some family members, primarily from the APOBEC3 subfamily (APOBEC3A-H, excluding E), can cause off-target deaminations of cytosine to form uracil on transiently single-stranded genomic DNA, which induces mutations that are associated with cancer evolution. Since uracil is only promutagenic, the mutations observed in cancer genomes originate only when uracil is not removed by uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG) or when the UNG-induced abasic site is erroneously repaired. However, when ssDNA is present, replication protein A (RPA) binds and protects the DNA from nucleases or recruits DNA repair proteins, such as UNG. Thus, APOBEC enzymes must compete with RPA to access their substrate. Certain APOBEC enzymes can displace RPA, bind and scan ssDNA efficiently to search for cytosines, and can become highly overexpressed in tumor cells. Depending on the DNA replication conditions and DNA structure, RPA can either be in excess or deficient. Here we discuss the interplay between these factors and how despite RPA, multiple cancer genomes have a mutation bias at cytosines indicative of APOBEC activity.
Subject(s)
DNA, Single-Stranded , Replication Protein A , Humans , Replication Protein A/genetics , Replication Protein A/metabolism , DNA, Single-Stranded/genetics , Cytidine Deaminase/genetics , Cytidine Deaminase/metabolism , Uracil-DNA Glycosidase/genetics , Uracil-DNA Glycosidase/metabolism , DNA Replication/genetics , Cytosine/metabolism , DNA/metabolism , Uracil/metabolism , APOBEC Deaminases/genetics , APOBEC Deaminases/metabolism , DeaminationABSTRACT
Endemic Burkitt lymphoma (eBL) is characterized by an oncogenic IGH/c-MYC translocation and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positivity, and is epidemiologically linked to Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Both EBV and malaria are thought to contribute to eBL by inducing the expression of activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), an enzyme involved in the IGH/c-MYC translocation. AID/apolipoprotein B mRNA editing catalytic polypeptide-like (AID/APOBEC) family enzymes have recently emerged as potent mutagenic sources in a variety of cancers, but apart from AID, their involvement in eBL and their regulation by EBV and P. falciparum is unknown. Here, we show that upon inoculation with EBV, human B cells strongly upregulate the expression of enzymatically active APOBEC3B and APOBEC3G. In addition, we found significantly increased levels of APOBEC3A in B cells of malaria patients, which correlated with parasite load. Interestingly, despite the fact that APOBEC3A, APOBEC3B, and APOBEC3G caused c-MYC mutations when overexpressed in HEK293T cells, a mutational enrichment in eBL tumors was only detected in AID motifs. This suggests that even though the EBV- and P. falciparum-directed immune response triggers the expression and activity of several AID/APOBEC members, only the upregulation of AID has oncogenic consequences, while the induction of the APOBEC3 subfamily may primarily have immunoprotective functions.