Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 166
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Transfusion ; 63 Suppl 3: S26-S34, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37070413

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Antifibrinolytic medications have been associated with reduced mortality in pediatric hemorrhage but may contribute to adverse events such as acute kidney injury (AKI). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of the MAssive Transfusion in Children (MATIC), a prospectively collected database of children with life-threatening hemorrhage (LTH), and evaluated for risk of adverse events with either antifibrinolytic treatment, epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) or tranexamic acid (TXA). The primary outcome was AKI and secondary outcomes were acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and sepsis. RESULTS: Of 448 children included, median (interquartile range) age was 7 (2-15) years, 55% were male, and LTH etiology was 46% trauma, 34% operative, and 20% medical. Three hundred and ninety-three patients did not receive an antifibrinolytic (88%); 37 (8%) received TXA and 18 (4%) received EACA. Sixty-seven (17.1%) patients in the no antifibrinolytic group developed AKI, 6 (16.2%) patients in the TXA group, and 9 (50%) patients in the EACA group (p = .002). After adjusting for cardiothoracic surgery, cyanotic heart disease, preexisting renal disease, lowest hemoglobin pre-LTH, and total weight-adjusted transfusion volume during the LTH, the EACA group had increased risk of AKI (adjusted odds ratio 3.3 [95% CI: 1.0-10.3]) compared to no antifibrinolytic. TXA was not associated with AKI. Neither antifibrinolytic treatment was associated with ARDS or sepsis. CONCLUSION: Administration of EACA during LTH may increase the risk of AKI. Additional studies are needed to compare the risk of AKI between EACA and TXA in pediatric patients.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , Antifibrinolytic Agents , Tranexamic Acid , Humans , Male , Child , Adolescent , Female , Aminocaproic Acid/adverse effects , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Antifibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Tranexamic Acid/adverse effects , Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced , Blood Loss, Surgical
2.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 24(1): 546, 2023 Jul 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37400783

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) has long been the antifibrinolytic hemostatic drug of choice for orthopedic surgery. In recent years, the hemostatic effect of epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) has gradually been recognized by orthopedic surgeons and has begun to be used in hip and knee arthroplasty with little mention of the comparison of these two drugs; Therefore, this study compared the efficacy and safety of EACA and TXA in the perioperative period of elderly patients with trochanteric fractures to verify whether EAC could be a "qualified alternative" to TXA and to provide theoretical support for the clinical application of TXA. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-three patients who received proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) for trochanteric fractures from January 2021 to March 2022 at our institution were included and divided into the EACA group (n = 146) and the TXA group. (n = 97) determined by the drugs used in the perioperative period The main observations were blood loss and blood transfusion.The second second outcome was blood routine, coagulation, Hospital complications and complications after discharge. RESULTS: The perioperative EACA patients had significantly lower significant blood loss (DBL) than the TXA group (p < 0.0001) and statistically significant lower C-reactive protein in the EACA group than in the TXA group on postoperative day 1 (p = 0.022). Patients on perioperative TXA had better postoperative day one (p = 0.002) and postoperative day five erythrocyte width than the EACA group (p = 0.004). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the remaining indicators in both drugs: blood items, coagulation indicators, blood loss, blood transfusion, length of hospital(LOH), total hospital expense, and postoperative complications (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The hemostatic effects and safety of EACA and TXA in the perioperative application of trochanteric fractures in the elderly are essentially similar, and EACA can be considered for use as an alternative to TXA, increasing the flexibility of physicians to use it in the clinical setting. However, the limited sample size included necessitated a high-quality, large sample of clinical studies and long-term follow-up.


Subject(s)
Antifibrinolytic Agents , Hip Fractures , Tranexamic Acid , Humans , Aged , Aminocaproic Acid/adverse effects , Tranexamic Acid/adverse effects , Postoperative Hemorrhage/etiology , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Antifibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Postoperative Period , Hip Fractures/drug therapy , Hip Fractures/surgery , Hip Fractures/complications
3.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 36(10): 3780-3790, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35843769

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine E-aminocaproic acid effectiveness in reducing transfusion requirements in overall and less-invasive cardiac surgery, and to assess its safety. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single-center tertiary academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 19,111 adult patients who underwent elective surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2016. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Propensity matching was used to create well-balanced groups and separately compare both overall cohort and less-invasive surgery with and without E-aminocaproic acid. Supplementary zero-inflated negative binomial regression analysis was used because outcome data were zero-inflated. Effectiveness was assessed by transfusion requirements, and safety by comparison of in-hospital outcomes. In the overall cohort, patients receiving E-aminocaproic acid received fewer red blood cells postoperatively and fewer intra- and postoperativel blood products. In a less-invasive cohort, there was no significant difference in red blood cell transfusion either intra- or postoperatively, but the E-aminocaproic group received fewer intra- and postoperative platelets, intraoperative cryoprecipitate, and postoperative plasma. There were no significant differences for in-hospital outcomes in both less-invasive and overall cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The reduction of postoperative red blood cell requirement observed when analyzing the overall cohort did not translate to less-invasive cardiac surgery in the authors' patient population; however, both overall and less-invasive cohorts had lower requirements for other blood components with E-aminocaproic acid. There was no association with major Society of thoracic surgeons (STS)-defined morbidity and mortality in both groups.


Subject(s)
Antifibrinolytic Agents , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Adult , Aminocaproic Acid/adverse effects , Antifibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Cardiopulmonary Bypass/adverse effects , Humans , Retrospective Studies
4.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 32(12): 1339-1346, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35925835

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Antifibrinolytics such as tranexamic acid and epsilon-aminocaproic acid are effective at reducing blood loss and transfusion in pediatric patients having craniofacial surgery. The Pediatric Craniofacial Collaborative Group has previously reported low rates of seizures and thromboembolic events (equal to no antifibrinolytic given) in open craniofacial surgery. AIMS: To query the Pediatric Craniofacial Collaborative Group database to provide an updated antifibrinolytic safety profile in children given that antifibrinolytics have become recommended standard of care in this surgical population. Additionally, we include the population of younger infants having minimally invasive procedures. METHODS: Patients in the Pediatric Craniofacial Collaborative Group registry between June 2012 and March 2021 having open craniofacial surgery (fronto-orbital advancement, mid and posterior vault, total cranial vault remodeling, intracranial LeFort III monobloc), endoscopic cranial suture release, and spring mediated cranioplasty were included. The primary outcome is the rate of postoperative complications possibly attributable to antifibrinolytic use (seizures, seizure-like activity, and thromboembolic events) in infants and children undergoing craniosynostosis surgery who did or did not receive antifibrinolytics. RESULTS: Forty-five institutions reporting 6583 patients were included. The overall seizure rate was 0.24% (95% CI: 0.14, 0.39%), with 0.20% in the no Antifibrinolytic group and 0.26% in the combined Antifibrinolytic group, with no statistically reported difference. Comparing seizure rates between tranexamic acid (0.22%) and epsilon-aminocaproic acid (0.44%), there was no statistically significant difference (odds ratio = 2.0; 95% CI: 0.6, 6.7; p = .257). Seizure rate was higher in patients greater than 6 months (0.30% vs. 0.18%; p = .327), patients undergoing open procedures (0.30% vs. 0.06%; p = .141), and syndromic patients (0.70% vs. 0.19%; p = .009). CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter international experience of pediatric craniofacial surgery reports no increase in seizures or thromboembolic events in those that received antifibrinolytics (tranexamic acid and epsilon-aminocaproic acid) versus those that did not. This report provides further evidence of antifibrinolytic safety. We recommend following pharmacokinetic-based dosing guidelines for administration.


Subject(s)
Antifibrinolytic Agents , Craniosynostoses , Tranexamic Acid , Infant , Humans , Child , Antifibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Tranexamic Acid/adverse effects , Aminocaproic Acid/adverse effects , Blood Loss, Surgical , Craniosynostoses/surgery , Seizures/epidemiology
6.
J Endovasc Ther ; 23(5): 744-50, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27385152

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To present the results of a prospective single-center study that evaluated the safety and efficacy of a hemostatic dressing following femoral artery access. METHODS: Within a 9-month period, 80 patients (mean age 68±14 years; 55 men) were treated with a hemostatic dressing patch (Hematrix Active Patch) containing aminocaproic acid, calcium chloride, and thrombin after endovascular procedures via a 6- to 8-F femoral artery access. After removing the sheath, the wound dressing was placed on the puncture site followed by constant manual compression adapted to the sheath size (specified pressure times: 8 minutes for 6-F, 9 minutes for 7-F, and 10 minutes for 8-F). Patients were treated with an additional pressure bandage for 24 hours. Hemostasis was checked clinically and with duplex ultrasound after patch removal and at 24 hours. Patient characteristics [platelets, systolic blood pressure, international normalized ratio (INR), and partial thromboplastin time (PTT)], sheath sizes, and approach direction were compared among patients with successful hemostasis (within specified pressure times) vs those with prolonged compression. RESULTS: A total of 39 6-F, 19 7-F, and 22 8-F sheaths were employed. In 73 (91.2%) of 80 patients, hemostasis was reached within the prespecified pressure times (mean 8.8±0.8 minutes). In 7 patients (4 6-F, 1 7-F, 2 8-F) a longer compression time was necessary (mean 34±30 minutes). No serious major complication occurred. Twelve (15.0%) minor and 5 (6.3%) moderate subcutaneous hematomas were observed. Two (2.5%) false aneurysms were treated successfully. Ambulation and discharge was possible within 24 hours in 79 (98.7%) cases. Patients with initial hemostasis and those with prolonged compression did not differ substantially (p>0.05) according to sheath size, approach direction, INR (1.09±0.3 vs 1.11±0.3), platelets (234±47×10(3)/µL vs 249±93×10(3)/µL), systolic blood pressure (150±26 vs 152±17 mm Hg), or PTT (31±7.9 vs 34.8±10.0 seconds). CONCLUSION: The evaluated wound dressing seems to be safe and effective in reducing time to hemostasis in large arterial access sites. However, a randomized trial with a larger population and an active control group is necessary to confirm these preliminary data. Moreover, additional focus on shortening the time to ambulation is required in future studies.


Subject(s)
Aminocaproic Acid/administration & dosage , Bandages , Calcium Chloride/administration & dosage , Femoral Artery , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Hemostasis/drug effects , Hemostatic Techniques/instrumentation , Hemostatics/administration & dosage , Thrombin/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aminocaproic Acid/adverse effects , Blood Coagulation Tests , Calcium Chloride/adverse effects , Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects , Catheterization, Peripheral/instrumentation , Female , Germany , Hemorrhage/blood , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemostatic Techniques/adverse effects , Hemostatics/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Platelet Count , Pressure , Prospective Studies , Punctures , Thrombin/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Access Devices
7.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 30(4): 917-23, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27020101

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine the role of epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) administered after reperfusion of the donor liver in the incidences of thromboembolic events and acute kidney injury within 30 days after orthotopic liver transplantation. One-year survival rates between the EACA-treated and EACA-nontreated groups also were examined. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational, cohort study design. SETTING: Single-center, university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 708 adult liver transplantations performed from 2008 to 2013. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: EACA administration was not associated with incidences of intracardiac thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (1.3%) or intraoperative death (0.6%). Logistic regression (n = 708) revealed 2 independent risk factors associated with myocardial ischemia (age and pre-transplant vasopressor use) and 8 risk factors associated with the need for post-transplant dialysis (age, female sex, redo orthotopic liver transplantation, preoperative sodium level, pre-transplant acute kidney injury or dialysis, platelet transfusion, and re-exploration within the first week after transplant); EACA was not identified as a risk factor for either outcome. One-year survival rates were similar between groups: 92% in EACA-treated group versus 93% in the EACA-nontreated group. CONCLUSIONS: The antifibrinolytic, EACA, was not associated with an increased incidence of thromboembolic complications or postoperative acute kidney injury, and it did not alter 1-year survival after liver transplantation.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Aminocaproic Acid/adverse effects , Antifibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Thromboembolism/etiology , Aminocaproic Acid/administration & dosage , Antifibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Renal Replacement Therapy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis
8.
Ann Pharmacother ; 48(12): 1563-9, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25214649

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Blood conservation is a major concern in the management of surgical patients because of transfusion-related complications, limited supply, and health care costs. Tranexamic acid (TXA) and ϵ-aminocaproic acid (ϵACA) are lysine analogue antifibrinolytics used to reduce surgical bleeding and transfusions. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TXA compared with ϵACA in the management of cardiovascular surgical bleeding at an academic medical center. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study included 120 patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery with or without cardiopulmonary bypass, who received at least 1 dose of perioperative TXA or ϵACA. The efficacy outcome-massive perioperative bleeding-was a composite end point of chest tube drainage >1500 mL in any 8-hour period after surgery, perioperative transfusion of 10 or more units of packed red blood cells, reoperation for bleeding, or death from hemorrhage within 30 days. The safety outcomes were incidence of thromboembolic events, postoperative renal dysfunction, seizure, and 30-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The primary end point-massive perioperative bleeding-occurred in 10 patients (16.7%) in the TXA group compared with 5 patients (8.3%) in the ϵACA group (P = 0.17). There were no significant differences in the secondary end points of 30-day all-cause mortality, thromboembolic events, renal dysfunction, and seizure. CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in the efficacy and safety outcomes between TXA and ϵACA in the management of cardiovascular surgical bleeding at our institution. Considering the substantial cost difference and comparable efficacy and safety, ϵACA may have better value over TXA for reducing cardiovascular surgical bleeding.


Subject(s)
Aminocaproic Acid/therapeutic use , Antifibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures , Tranexamic Acid/therapeutic use , Aged , Aminocaproic Acid/adverse effects , Antifibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Blood Transfusion , Cardiopulmonary Bypass , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Tranexamic Acid/adverse effects
9.
Br J Anaesth ; 111(4): 549-63, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23661406

ABSTRACT

Antifibrinolytic drugs have become almost ubiquitous in their use during major surgery when bleeding is expected or commonplace. Inhibition of the fibrinolytic pathway after tissue injury has been consistently shown to reduce postoperative or traumatic bleeding. There is also some evidence for a reduction of perioperative blood transfusion. However, evidence of complications associated with exaggerated thrombosis also exists, although this appears to be influenced by the choice of the individual agent and the dose administered. There is controversy over the use of the serine protease inhibitor aprotinin, whose license was recently withdrawn but may shortly become available on the market again. In the UK, tranexamic acid, a tissue plasminogen and plasmin inhibitor, is most commonly used, with evidence for benefit in cardiac, orthopaedic, urological, gynaecological, and obstetric surgery. In the USA, ε-aminocaproic acid, which also inhibits plasmin, is commonly used. We have reviewed the current literature for this increasingly popular class of drugs to support clinical judgement in daily anaesthetic practice.


Subject(s)
Antifibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Postoperative Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Aminocaproic Acid/adverse effects , Aminocaproic Acid/therapeutic use , Antifibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Aprotinin/adverse effects , Aprotinin/therapeutic use , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Female , Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Humans , Liver/surgery , Neurosurgical Procedures/adverse effects , Orthopedic Procedures/adverse effects , Postpartum Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Pregnancy , Tranexamic Acid/adverse effects , Tranexamic Acid/therapeutic use , Wounds and Injuries/complications
10.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 27(1): 23-9, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22995453

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare 2 different doses of ε-aminocaproic acid (EACA) and assess their relative efficacy and safety in children undergoing corrective surgery for tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled study. SETTING: A tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty children undergoing corrective surgery for TOF using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). INTERVENTIONS: Group 1 received 100 mg/kg of EACA after induction, upon initiation of CPB, and after protamine. Group 2 received 75 mg/kg of EACA after induction, followed by a maintenance infusion of 75 mg/kg/h until chest closure, and an additional 75 mg/kg upon initiation of CPB. Group 3 did not receive any antifibrinolytic agent or placebo. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Cumulative mean blood loss, total packed red blood cells, and fresh frozen plasma requirements were significantly less in group 2 (p ≤ 0.01). There were no significant differences in the total platelet concentrate transfused, re-exploration rate, incidence of renal failure, arrhythmias, neurologic complications, mortality, or length of intensive care unit stay among the 3 groups. The incidences of perioperative ST/T changes and chest closure time were significantly less in group 1 and group 2 (p ≤ 0.01). The duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly less in group 2 (p ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: EACA was effective in reducing the postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements in children undergoing corrective cardiac surgery on CPB for TOF. The dose regimen of 75 mg/kg after induction, followed by a maintenance infusion of 75 mg/kg/h until chest closure, and an additional 75 mg/kg upon initiation of CPB were more effective.


Subject(s)
Aminocaproic Acid/administration & dosage , Antifibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Postoperative Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Tetralogy of Fallot/surgery , Aminocaproic Acid/adverse effects , Antifibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Child, Preschool , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Nervous System Diseases/epidemiology , Postoperative Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Tetralogy of Fallot/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome
11.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 27(6): 1201-7, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24050855

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) versus epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) in patients undergoing thoracic aortic surgery. DESIGN: A prospective randomized study. SETTING: A tertiary care center. PARTICIPANT: The study was conducted on 64 consecutive adult patients undergoing thoracic aortic surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). INTERVENTIONS: Group EACA received a bolus of 50 mg/kg of EACA after induction of anesthesia over 20 minutes followed by maintenance infusion of 25 mg/kg/h until chest closure. Group TXA received a bolus of 10 mg/kg of TXA after induction of anesthesia over 20 minutes followed by maintenance infusion of 1 mg/kg/h until chest closure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cumulated mean blood loss, total packed red blood cells, and blood product requirement up to 24 h postoperatively were comparable between groups. A significant renal injury (EACA 40% v TXA 16%; p = 0.04) and increased tendency for renal failure (EACA 10% v TXA 0%, p = 0.11; relative risk 2.15) were observed with EACA compared to TXA. There was increased tendency of seizure with TXA (EACA v TXA: 3.3% v 10%; p>0.05, relative risk 1.53). There was significant increase in the D-dimer from preoperative to postoperative values in Group EACA. (p< 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Both EACA and TXA were equally effective in reducing the perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirement in patients undergoing thoracic aortic surgery. While significant renal injury was observed with EACA, there was a tendency for higher incidence of seizure with TXA. Prospective placebo-controlled trials recruiting larger sample size using sensitive biomarkers are required before any recommendations.


Subject(s)
Aminocaproic Acid/therapeutic use , Antifibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Aorta, Thoracic/surgery , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Tranexamic Acid/therapeutic use , Vascular Surgical Procedures/methods , Adult , Aminocaproic Acid/adverse effects , Antifibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Blood Transfusion/methods , Cardiopulmonary Bypass/methods , Female , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Care , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prospective Studies , Renal Insufficiency/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency/etiology , Sample Size , Tranexamic Acid/adverse effects , Vascular Surgical Procedures/mortality
12.
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther ; 48(7-8): 454-61; quiz 462, 2013 Jul.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23929163

ABSTRACT

More than 30 years ago the pioneering work of Andrew and co-workers showed that the coagulation system of children is different than from adult. They have introduced the term of "developmental hemostasis" to describe this phenomenon. They were able to show that the concentration of coagulation factors and inhibitors are age-dependent and therefore reference limits from adult practice cannot be transferred to children one to one. Numerous studies showed that the perioperative loss of blood, and thus the use of homologous blood could be limited by administering antifibrinolytic substances such as aprotinin. Other antifibrinolytics acting substances like Epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) or tranexamic acid (TXA) tended to be misfits in routine clinical practice. In 2006, the publication of a retrospective study carried out by Mangano et al, in which considerable safety concerns were expressed with regard to aprotinin led to a significant rethinking of its clinical use. Two years later the results of the BART (Blood Conservation using antifibrinolytics in a Randomized Trial) study confirmed that there was an increased postoperative mortality associated with the use of aprotinin compared to TXA and EACA. In a few adult studies so far tranexamic acid was found to be comparably as effective as aprotinin. Although TXA is a long known drug available on the market for more than 50 years, the studies connecting factors of indication, dosage regimen and safety are limited especially in children and infants. This article highlights the differences in the coagulation system in children compared to adult as well as indication, dosage regimens and possible side effects of antifibrinolytic agents in children.


Subject(s)
Antifibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Hemostatics/therapeutic use , Pediatrics/methods , Surgical Procedures, Operative/methods , Adolescent , Age Factors , Aminocaproic Acid/adverse effects , Aminocaproic Acid/therapeutic use , Antifibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Aprotinin/adverse effects , Aprotinin/therapeutic use , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Child , Child, Preschool , Hemostasis , Hemostatics/administration & dosage , Hemostatics/adverse effects , Humans , Infant , Pediatrics/standards , Surgical Procedures, Operative/standards , Tranexamic Acid/adverse effects , Tranexamic Acid/therapeutic use
13.
Thromb Res ; 221: 120-129, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36527742

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the optimal regimen, efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) and aminocaproic acid (EACA) for patients after total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: The network meta-analysis was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guideline. The outcomes were total blood loss, transfusion rates, hemoglobin (HB) drop, and risk for pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Subgroup analyses were performed among most effective regimens to determine the influences of timing and number of doses. RESULTS: A total of 56 eligible RCTs with different regimens were assessed. For reducing total blood loss, all high doses of TXA and EACA except high dose of intra-articular (IA) TXA, as well as medium dose of combination of intravenous and intra-articular (combined IV/IA) TXA were most effective. All high doses of TXA, as well as medium dose of combined IV/IA TXA did not show inferiority in reducing transfusion rates and HB drop compared with other regimens. No regimens showed higher risk for PE or DVT compared with placebo, and no statistical differences were seen among most effective regimens in subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: As effective as high doses of EACA and TXA, medium dose (20-40 mg/kg or 1.5-3.0 g) of combined IV/IA TXA was enough to control bleeding for patients after THA without increasing risk for PE/DVT. TXA was at least 5 times more potent than EACA. Timing and number of doses had few influences on blood conserving efficacy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.


Subject(s)
Antifibrinolytic Agents , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Pulmonary Embolism , Tranexamic Acid , Humans , Tranexamic Acid/adverse effects , Aminocaproic Acid/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Antifibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Bayes Theorem , Network Meta-Analysis , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Administration, Intravenous
16.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 25(3): 402-6, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21419653

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of renal injury among pediatric patients who received aprotinin while undergoing cardiac surgery compared with those who received ε-aminocaproic acid (EACA). DESIGN: A retrospective observational study. SETTING: A single academic center. PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric cardiac patients who had cardiopulmonary bypass and received aprotinin or EACA. INTERVENTION: Patients undergoing pediatric cardiac surgery received aprotinin from 2005 to 2007 and EACA from 2008 to 2009. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was acute kidney injury (AKI) defined as serum Cr elevation at discharge more than 1.5 times the baseline value. Secondary outcomes included bleeding, blood transfusion, and the volume of chest tube drainage in the first 24 hours postoperatively. One hundred seventy-eight patients met inclusion criteria; 120 patients received aprotinin, and 58 patients received EACA. These 2 groups did not differ significantly in age, weight, or duration of cardiac bypass. Logistic regression analysis, adjusted for confounding variables (ie, baseline Cr, sex, age, CPB time, inotropic support and vasopressors), showed a higher odds of suffering AKI at discharge with the usage of aprotinin (odds ratio = 4.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-19.5; p = 0.03). The volume of the first 24 hours of chest tube drainage was not significantly different between groups, as well as packed red blood cells and cryoprecipitate units. However, fresh frozen plasma and platelets showed statistically significant differences with more transfusion in the EACA group. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, the authors observed a higher odds of AKI for aprotinin usage compared with EACA, suggesting that the known concern for adults with adverse kidney effects with aprotinin is also appropriate for pediatric patients.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced , Aminocaproic Acid/adverse effects , Aprotinin/adverse effects , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Postoperative Complications/chemically induced , Acute Kidney Injury/blood , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Age Factors , Child , Child, Preschool , Creatine/blood , Female , Glomerular Filtration Rate/drug effects , Glomerular Filtration Rate/physiology , Humans , Infant , Kidney Function Tests/methods , Male , Postoperative Complications/blood , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
17.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 25(1): 16-9, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20870423

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim was to compare the "clinical value" of tranexamic acid (TXA) with ε-aminocaproic acid (EACA) when used for blood conservation during high-risk cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Data previously reported by the Blood Conservation Using Antifibrinolytics in a Randomized Trial (BART) study investigators were reanalyzed independently after appropriate statistical adjustment. The authors compared TXA with EACA for important primary and secondary outcomes and applied the "clinical value" equation to this comparison. SETTING: BART, the largest blinded multicenter study on this topic to date, compared all 3 commonly used antifibrinolytics head-to-head in a randomized dose-equivalent fashion during high-risk cardiac surgery. Comparisons of TXA with EACA with application of the clinical value equation was not performed specifically by the BART investigators. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand five hundred fifty patients enrolled in 2 of the 3 arms of the BART study were included in the analysis (TXA, n= 770 and EACA, n = 780, with data reported by the investigators in the New England Journal of Medicine). MAIN RESULTS: The major finding was that there were no significant differences in overall safety and clinically important efficacy between TXA and EACA. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the substantial difference in costs and with the increasing volume of high-risk cardiac surgery, EACA has increased "clinical value" when compared with TXA. EACA should be the antifibrinolytic medication of choice for high-risk cardiac surgery.


Subject(s)
Aminocaproic Acid/therapeutic use , Anesthesia , Antifibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods , Algorithms , Aminocaproic Acid/adverse effects , Aminocaproic Acid/economics , Antifibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Antifibrinolytic Agents/economics , Aprotinin/adverse effects , Aprotinin/therapeutic use , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/economics , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Postoperative Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Postoperative Hemorrhage/etiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Tranexamic Acid/adverse effects , Tranexamic Acid/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
18.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 25(1): 20-5, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21272777

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Although the lysine analogs tranexamic acid (TXA) and aminocaproic acid (EACA) are used widely for antifibrinolytic therapy in cardiac surgery, relatively little research has been performed on their safety profiles, especially in the setting of cardiac surgery. Two antifibrinolytic protocols using either TXA or aminocaproic acid were compared according to postoperative outcome. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis. SETTING: A university-affiliated hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred four patients undergoing cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: One cohort of 275 consecutive patients received TXA; a second cohort of 329 consecutive patients was treated with EACA. Except for antifibrinolytic therapy, the anesthetic and surgical teams and their protocols remained unchanged. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Besides major outcome criteria, namely postoperative bleeding, the need for allogeneic transfusions, operative revision because of bleeding, postoperative renal dysfunction, neurologic events, heart failure, and in-hospital mortality, the authors specifically sought differences between the groups concerning seizures. The 2 cohorts were comparable over a range of perioperative factors. Postoperative seizures occurred significantly more frequently in TXA patients (7.6% v 3.3%, p = 0.019), whereas EACA patients had a higher incidence of postoperative renal dysfunction (20.0% v 30.1%, p = 0.005). There were no differences in all other measured major outcome factors. CONCLUSION: Both lysine analogs are associated with significant side effects, which must be taken into account when performing risk-benefit analyses of their use. Their use should be restricted to patients at high risk for bleeding; routine use on low-risk patients undergoing standard surgeries should face renewed critical reappraisal.


Subject(s)
Aminocaproic Acid/adverse effects , Antifibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Seizures/epidemiology , Tranexamic Acid/adverse effects , Aged , Aminocaproic Acid/therapeutic use , Anesthesia , Antifibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Cohort Studies , Coronary Artery Bypass , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Ischemic Attack, Transient/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Stroke/epidemiology , Tranexamic Acid/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
19.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol ; 24(1): 92-7, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20881484

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hemorrhage, transfusions and the need for re-exploration can have a detrimental effect on patient outcome in cardiac surgery. With the suspension of aprotinin from the market, only the antifibrinolytics tranexamic acid and epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) are left as pharmacological options to reduce hemostatic activation and associated bleeding complications. In light of the aprotinin story, the need for large independent safety studies has become evident. The current review will focus on the question of how far the quality of available data allows for judging these agents with regard to safety and efficacy, as well as whether or not new trails are warranted. RECENT FINDINGS: Both, tranexamic acid and EACA are effective in reducing blood loss and transfusion requirements in cardiac surgery. Analysis of data is complicated as the dosing scheme, especially for tranexamic acid, varies extremely and the agents are highly overdosed in most relevant trials. Newer data indicates that in a dose-dependent fashion, tranexamic acid is associated with an increase of adverse events, particularly the observation of seizures. In these studies, however, tranexamic acid has also been highly overdosed. SUMMARY: The lysine analogs are unspecific enzyme inhibitors. Therefore, it is conceivable that an overdosing might reveal severe clinical side-effects beyond the inhibition of plasmin. Further studies re-evaluating the drug safety of tranexamic acid and EACA using the recommended and approved doses are necessary.


Subject(s)
Aminocaproic Acid/therapeutic use , Antifibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Tranexamic Acid/therapeutic use , Aminocaproic Acid/adverse effects , Aminocaproic Acid/pharmacology , Cardiopulmonary Bypass , Humans , Postoperative Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Tranexamic Acid/adverse effects , Tranexamic Acid/pharmacology
20.
World Neurosurg ; 156: 12-21, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34478888

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Perioperative blood loss is a major concern in spinal fusion surgery and often requires blood transfusion. A large amount of perioperative blood loss might increase the risks of various perioperative complications. Recent clinical studies have focused on the perioperative administration of epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) in spinal fusion surgery. The aim of this review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EACA in spinal fusion surgery. METHODS: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were systematically searched up to April 2021. Data on perioperative blood loss, blood transfusion, and complications were extracted and analyzed by RevMan software. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled studies comprising 398 patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery were included in this systematic review. Compared with the control group, the EACA group had significantly lower total perioperative blood loss, postoperative blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin, postoperative blood transfusion units, total blood transfusion units, and postoperative red blood cell transfusion units. Additionally, no significant differences were observed between the EACA and control groups in intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion units, intraoperative crystalloid administered, hospital stays, operative time, perioperative respiratory complications, and wound bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: EACA in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery is effective in perioperative hemostasis without increasing the incidence of postoperative complications. However, more large-scale trials are needed to examine the long-term adverse side effects of EACA in spinal fusion surgery.


Subject(s)
Aminocaproic Acid/administration & dosage , Antifibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Perioperative Care/methods , Spinal Fusion/trends , Aminocaproic Acid/adverse effects , Antifibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Humans , Perioperative Care/adverse effects , Spinal Fusion/methods , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL