Safety, tolerability, and activity of the active C1s antibody riliprubart in cold agglutinin disease: a phase 1b study.

ABSTRACT: Cold agglutinin disease is a rare autoimmune hemolytic anemia characterized by complement pathway-mediated hemolysis. Riliprubart (SAR445088, BIVV020), a second-generation classical complement inhibitor, is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits only the activated form of C1s. This Phase 1b study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and effect on hemolysis of riliprubart in adult patients with cold agglutinin disease. On day 1, 12 patients received a single IV dose of either 30 mg/kg (n = 6) or 15 mg/kg (n = 6) of riliprubart and were subsequently followed for 15 weeks. Riliprubart was generally well tolerated; there were no treatment-emergent serious adverse events, or treatment-emergent adverse events leading to death or permanent study discontinuation. There were no reports of serious infections, encapsulated bacterial infections including meningococcal infections, hypersensitivity, or thromboembolic events. Rapid improvements in hemoglobin (day 5) and bilirubin (day 1) were observed in both treatment cohorts. Mean hemoglobin levels were maintained at >11.0 g/dL from day 29 and mean levels of bilirubin were normalized by day 29; both responses were maintained throughout the study. Improvements in clinical markers closely correlated with a sustained reduction in the 50% hemolytic complement (CH50) throughout the study. Mean C4 levels, an in vivo marker of treatment activity, increased 1 week after treatment with either dose of riliprubart and were sustained throughout the study. In conclusion, a single IV dose of riliprubart was well tolerated, and led to rapid classical complement inhibition, control of hemolysis, and improvement in anemia, all of which were sustained over 15 weeks. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04269551.

Sutimlimab in Cold Agglutinin Disease.

BACKGROUND: Cold agglutinin disease is a rare autoimmune hemolytic anemia characterized by hemolysis that is caused by activation of the classic complement pathway. Sutimlimab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, selectively targets the C1s protein, a C1 complex serine protease responsible for activating this pathway. METHODS: We conducted a 26-week multicenter, open-label, single-group study to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous sutimlimab in patients with cold agglutinin disease and a recent history of transfusion. The composite primary end point was a normalization of the hemoglobin level to 12 g or more per deciliter or an increase in the hemoglobin level of 2 g or more per deciliter from baseline, without red-cell transfusion or medications prohibited by the protocol. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of sutimlimab; 13 patients (54%) met the criteria for the composite primary end point. The least-squares mean increase in hemoglobin level was 2.6 g per deciliter at the time of treatment assessment (weeks 23, 25, and 26). A mean hemoglobin level of more than 11 g per deciliter was maintained in patients from week 3 through the end of the study period. The mean bilirubin levels normalized by week 3. A total of 17 patients (71%) did not receive a transfusion from week 5 through week 26. Clinically meaningful reductions in fatigue were observed by week 1 and were maintained throughout the study. Activity in the classic complement pathway was rapidly inhibited, as assessed by a functional assay. Increased hemoglobin levels, reduced bilirubin levels, and reduced fatigue coincided with inhibition of the classic complement pathway. At least one adverse event occurred during the treatment period in 22 patients (92%). Seven patients (29%) had at least one serious adverse event, none of which were determined by the investigators to be related to sutimlimab. No meningococcal infections occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cold agglutinin disease who received sutimlimab, selective upstream inhibition of activity in the classic complement pathway rapidly halted hemolysis, increased hemoglobin levels, and reduced fatigue. (Funded by Sanofi; CARDINAL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03347396.).

Sutimlimab in patients with cold agglutinin disease: results of the randomized placebo-controlled phase 3 CADENZA trial.

Sutimlimab, a first-in-class humanized immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits the classical complement pathway at C1s, rapidly halted hemolysis in the single-arm CARDINAL study in recently transfused patients with cold agglutinin disease (CAD). CADENZA was a 26-week randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 study to assess safety and efficacy of sutimlimab in patients with CAD without recent (within 6 months prior to enrollment) transfusion history. Forty-two patients with screening hemoglobin ≤10 g/dL, elevated bilirubin, and ≥1 CAD symptom received sutimlimab (n = 22) or placebo (n = 20) on days 0 and 7 and then biweekly. Composite primary endpoint criteria (hemoglobin increase ≥1.5 g/dL at treatment assessment timepoint [mean of weeks 23, 25, 26], avoidance of transfusion, and study-prohibited CAD therapy [weeks 5-26]) were met by 16 patients (73%) on sutimlimab, and 3 patients (15%) on placebo (odds ratio, 15.9 [95% confidence interval, 2.9, 88.0; P < .001]). Sutimlimab, but not placebo, significantly increased mean hemoglobin and FACIT-Fatigue scores at treatment assessment timepoint. Sutimlimab normalized mean bilirubin by week 1. Improvements correlated with near-complete inhibition of the classical complement pathway (2.3% mean activity at week 1) and C4 normalization. Twenty-one (96%) sutimlimab patients and 20 (100%) placebo patients experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event. Headache, hypertension, rhinitis, Raynaud phenomenon, and acrocyanosis were more frequent with sutimlimab vs placebo, with a difference of ≥3 patients between groups. Three sutimlimab patients discontinued owing to adverse events; no placebo patients discontinued. These data demonstrate that sutimlimab has potential to be an important advancement in the treatment of CAD. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03347422.

Hematologic complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a class of antineoplastic therapies that unleash immune cells to kill malignant cells. There are currently 7 medications that have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of 14 solid tumors and 2 hematologic malignancies. These medications commonly cause immune-related adverse effects as a result of overactive T lymphocytes, autoantibody production, and/or cytokine dysregulation. Hematologic toxicities are rare and of uncertain mechanism, and therefore management is often based on experiences with familiar conditions involving these perturbed immune responses, such as autoimmune hemolytic anemia, immune thrombocytopenia, and idiopathic aplastic anemia. Management is challenging because one must attend to the hematologic toxicity while simultaneously attending to the malignancy, with the imperative that effective cancer therapy be maintained or minimally interrupted if possible. The purpose of this review is to help clinicians by providing a clinical and pathophysiological framework in which to view these problems.

Sirolimus is effective and safe in childhood relapsed-refractory autoimmune cytopenias: A multicentre study.

Autoimmune cytopenias are a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by immune-mediated destruction of haematopoietic cell lines. Effective and well-tolerated treatment options for relapsed-refractory immune cytopenias are limited. In this study, the aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sirolimus in this disease group within the paediatric age group. The study enrolled patients in the paediatric age group who used sirolimus with a diagnosis of immune cytopenia between December 2010 and December 2020, followed at six centres in Turkey. Of the 17 patients, five (29.4%) were treated for autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA), six (35.2%) for immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) and six (35.2%) for Evans syndrome (ES). The mean response time was 2.7 months (range, 0-9 months). Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) were obtained in 13 of 17 patients (76.4%) and nonresponse (NR) in four patients (23.5%). Among the 13 patients who achieved CR, three of them were NR in the follow-up and two of them had remission with low-dose steroid and sirolimus. Thus, overall response rate (ORR) was achieved in 12 of 17 patients (70.5%). In conclusion, sirolimus may be an effective and safe option in paediatric patients with relapsed-refractory immune cytopenia.

Autoimmune Cytopenias Are Highly Associated with Inborn Errors of Immunity and They May Be the Initial Presentations in Cases without Severe Infections.

INTRODUCTION: Inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) are inherited disorders that present with increased susceptibility to infections as well as noninfectious complications. Due to the aberrant immune functions of patients with IEI, autoimmune cytopenia (AIC) may be the initial finding, which makes diagnosis a challenge. We aimed to evaluate the clinical course, laboratory findings, and treatment response of AIC in children with IEI. METHODS: Data of children with autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) and/or immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) were obtained from a retrospective chart review of IEI patients diagnosed and followed in our center. Demographic and clinical features and therapeutic outcomes were evaluated. Immunologic findings were compared between patients with AIHA, ITP, and Evans syndrome (ES). The patients were also divided into two subgroups based on the presence or absence of immune dysregulation diseases (IDDs), and all data were compared between these two groups. RESULTS: Out of 562 patients with IEI, 6% (n: 34) had AIC which were ITP (23.5%), AIHA (35.5%), and ES (41.2%). AIC was the initial finding in 50% of these 34 patients. Patients with ES had a higher mean percentage of CD8+ T lymphocytes than ITP patients (40.77 ± 20.21% vs. 22.33 ± 12.48%, p = 0.011). Patients with IDDs were more likely to develop ES (p = 0.004), lymphoproliferation (p = 0.005), and resistance to first-line therapy (p = 0.021) than other IEI groups. CONCLUSION: This study shows that AIC may be the initial finding of IEI, particularly when lymphoproliferation and resistance to first-line therapy co-occur. Therefore, detailed investigation should be offered to all patients to avoid diagnostic delay.

Healthcare resource utilization of patients with warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia initiating first line therapy of oral corticosteroids with or without rituximab.

This retrospective cohort study described real-world treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) of patients with warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia (wAIHA) initiating treatment with first-line (1L) oral corticosteroids (OCS) + rituximab (R) compared to 1L OCS. Patients with a wAIHA diagnosis code (D59.11) between 8/2020-3/2022 were identified using US pharmacy and medical claims databases. Patients initiating 1L OCS ± R were identified (date of initiation = 'index date') with a 1-year pre-index period and a variable (minimum 1-year) follow-up period. The final sample comprised 77 1L OCS + R patients and 400 1L OCS patients (~ 60% female, mean age > 64 years). Over the 1-year follow-up, HCRU was higher in the OCS + R cohort with higher mean number of physician office visits (22.9 and 14.4; p < 0.01), including hematology/oncology office visits, and higher utilization of rescue therapy (59.7% and 33.3%; p < 0.01), driven by higher use of injectable corticosteroids. Patients in OCS + R and OCS groups completed 1L therapy after a similar mean duration of 103.5 and 134.6 days, respectively (p = 0.24). In the majority of patients, second-line (2L) therapy was initiated at a similar timepoint: 66.2% OCS + R and 72.0% OCS cohorts (p = 0.31) initiated 2L in a mean of 218.3 and 203.2 days (p = 0.76) after the end of 1L treatment, respectively. The addition of rituximab in 1L did not extend the remission period, with most patients in both cohorts initiating 2L therapy within less than 1 year of completing 1L treatment. 1L OCS + R patients also had substantial HCRU burden. More effective novel therapies are needed to address the high unmet need in wAIHA.

Fostamatinib for warm antibody autoimmune hemolytic anemia: Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, global study (FORWARD).

Warm antibody autoimmune hemolytic anemia (wAIHA) is characterized by hemolysis and symptomatic anemia with no approved treatment options. Fostamatinib is an oral spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in the US and Europe for treatment of adults with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. In this phase 3 study, patients with an insufficient response to ≥1 prior wAIHA treatment were randomized to fostamatinib or placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients to achieve a durable hemoglobin (Hgb) response (Hgb ≥10 g/dL and increase from baseline of ≥2 g/dL on 3 consecutive visits) during the 24-week treatment period. Ninety patients were randomized, 45 to each arm. Of the fostamatinib-treated patients, 35.6% achieved a durable Hgb response versus 26.7% on placebo (p = .398). A post hoc analysis revealed a large placebo response in Eastern European patients. Significantly more patients on fostamatinib from North America, Australia and Western Europe exhibited a durable Hgb response compared to placebo (36% vs. 10.7%, p = .030). After censoring for Hgb values impacted by steroid rescue received during screening and excluding 2 placebo patients found to likely not have wAIHA, a reanalysis demonstrated a difference in durable Hgb response between fostamatinib and placebo (15/45 [33.3%] vs. 6/43 [14.0%], p = .0395). At least 1 AE was reported in 42 (93.3%) and 40 (88.9%) patients receiving fostamatinib and placebo, respectively. The most common AEs in the fostamatinib group were diarrhea (26.7%), hypertension (24.4%), and fatigue (15.6%). In this study, fostamatinib demonstrated a clinically meaningful benefit for patients in Western regions, and no new safety signals were identified.

Cost-effectiveness of sutimlimab in cold agglutinin disease.

Primary cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is a rare autoimmune hemolytic anemia caused by cold-reactive antibodies that bind to red blood cells and lead to complement-mediated hemolysis. Patients with primary CAD experience the burden of increased health resource utilization and reduced quality of life. The standard-of-care (SOC) in patients with primary CAD has included cold avoidance, transfusion support, and chemoimmunotherapy. The use of sutimlimab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits C1-mediated hemolysis, was shown to reduce transfusion-dependence and improve quality of life across two pivotal phase 3 studies, further supported by 2-year extension data. Using data from the transfusion-dependent patient population that led to sutimlimab's initial FDA approval, we performed the first-ever cost-effectiveness analysis in primary CAD. The projected incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in our Markov model was $2 340 000/QALY, significantly above an upper-end conventional US willingness-to-pay threshold of $150 000/QALY. These results are consistent across scenarios of higher body weight and a pan-refractory SOC patient phenotype (i.e., treated sequentially with bendamustine-rituximab, bortezomib, ibrutinib, and eculizumab). No parameter variations in deterministic sensitivity analyses changed our conclusion. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, SOC was favored over sutimlimab in 100% of 10 000 iterations. Exploratory threshold analyses showed that significant price reduction (>80%) or time-limited treatment (<18 months) followed by lifelong clinical remission off sutimlimab would allow sutimlimab to become cost-effective. The impact of sutimlimab on health system costs with longer term follow-up data merits future study and consideration through a distributional cost-effectiveness framework.

Successful treatment of concurrent cold agglutinin disease and myelodysplastic syndrome.

Herein, we describe a case of severe anemia presenting with myelodysplastic syndrome with cold agglutinin disease that was successfully treated by a moderate dose of steroids followed by cyclosporine. In patients with myelodysplastic syndrome, autoimmunity in erythroid cells is occasionally demonstrated, and autoimmune hemolytic anemia is seen in some patients. However, hemolytic anemia with cold agglutinin in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome is less common, and the effect of corticosteroids for autoimmune hemolytic anemia caused by cold agglutinin is thought to be limited. Although the elevated levels of reticulocytes and LDH are usually caused by ineffective hematopoiesis in myelodysplastic syndrome, clinicians should be aware of latent cold agglutinin disease. In the present case, in addition to the improvement of erythroid dysplasia, the corticosteroid-sparing effect on cold agglutinin disease may have played a role in the mechanism underlying the effectiveness of cyclosporine.

Clinical Approach to Immune-Mediated Hemolytic Anemia and Thrombocytopenia.

Primary immune mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) and thrombocytopenia (IMTP) are rare in horses with the conditions more commonly occurring secondary to underlying disease. Several case reports have suggested a link between neoplasia and immune-mediated destruction of platelets and red blood cells. Diagnostic investigations should therefore focus on identifying possible underlying causes such as infections and neoplasia. Immunosuppressive therapy with corticosteroids and azathioprine is the mainstay of treatment but should be used cautiously in cases where underlying infection has not been excluded. Given the frequent association of secondary IMHA and IMTP cases with neoplasia, primary cases generally have a better prognosis.

Maintenence rituximab following induction in autoimmune cytopenias.

About 50% of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients respond to rituximab induction, but most relapse. The effectiveness of rituximab maintenance remains untested. This study included autoimmune cytopenia patients who had previously responded to rituximab induction but subsequently relapsed. After re-induction, patients received rituximab maintenance regimen consisting of a single 375 mg/m2 dose administered at 4 month intervals, with a maximum of 6 doses. Primary endpoints were duration of response and safety. Sixteen patients: ITP (9), autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (2), and Evans syndrome (5) received rituximab maintenance. 15/16 achieved complete response (CR); 8/15 CR + 1 partial reponse remain in remission. Median response: 43 months; estimated 5-year relapse-free >50%. Three developed hypogammaglobulinemia. Rituximab maintenance led to prolonged remissions in patients with autoimmune cytopenias who had previously responded to rituximab induction.

Sutimlimab Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Patients with Cold Agglutinin Disease.

Sutimlimab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the classic complement pathway, is approved in the United States, Japan, and the European Union for the treatment of hemolytic anemia in adults with cold agglutinin disease. The objectives of this study were to support dose selection for phase 3 studies, assess dose recommendations, and establish the relationship between sutimlimab exposure and clinical outcome [hemoglobin (Hb) levels]. Clinically meaningful biomarkers were graphically analyzed and the exposure-response relationship was proposed. The pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of sutimlimab were best described by a two-compartment model with parallel linear and nonlinear clearance terms. Body weight was a significant covariate for the volume of distribution in the central compartment (Vc) and total body clearance of sutimlimab. Ethnicity (Japanese, non-Japanese) was a covariate on Vc and maximal nonlinear clearance. There were no PK differences between healthy participants and patients. After graphical exposure-response analysis for biomarkers, a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model was developed by integrating an indirect response/turnover model for Hb with a maximum effect (Emax) model, relating the Hb-elevating effect of sutimlimab to plasma exposure. Renal function and occurrence of blood transfusion were identified as covariates on Hb change from baseline. Simulations showed that Emax was attained with the approved dosing (6.5 g in patients <75 kg and 7.5 g in patients ≥75 kg), independent of covariate characteristics, and provided adequate sutimlimab exposure to maximize effects on Hb, bilirubin, and total complement component C4 levels. A change in Hb from baseline at steady state of 2.2 g/dl was projected, consistent with phase 3 study observations. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The final validated population pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models confirm that the approved dosing regimen for sutimlimab (6.5 g in patients <75 kg and 7.5 g in patients ≥75 kg) is sufficient, without the need for further dose adjustments in populations of patients with cold agglutinin disease.

How I treat cold agglutinin disease.

The last decades have seen great progress in the treatment of cold agglutinin disease (CAD). Comparative trials are lacking, and recommendations must be based mainly on nonrandomized trials and will be influenced by personal experience. Herein, current treatment options are reviewed and linked to 3 cases, each addressing specific aspects of therapy. Two major steps in CAD pathogenesis are identified, clonal B-cell lymphoproliferation and complement-mediated hemolysis, each of which constitutes a target of therapy. Although drug treatment is not always indicated, patients with symptomatic anemia or other bothersome symptoms should be treated. The importance of avoiding ineffective therapies is underscored. Corticosteroids should not be used to treat CAD. Studies on safety and efficacy of relevant drugs and combinations are briefly described. The author recommends that B cell-directed approaches remain the first choice in most patients requiring treatment. The 4-cycle bendamustine plus rituximab combination is highly efficacious and sufficiently safe and induces durable responses in most patients, but the time to response can be many months. Rituximab monotherapy should be preferred in frail patients. The complement C1s inhibitor sutimlimab is an emerging option in the second line and may also find its place in the first line in specific situations.

Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia in the Pediatric Age Group: The Egyptian Experience.

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a common disease entity among adults; however, it is rare among the pediatric age group. Evidence is scarce regarding pediatric AIHA in the literature. The objective of this study is to assess the frequency of AIHA and describe the clinical and laboratory characteristics and treatment outcomes of a cohort of children with AIHA in Egypt. A retrospective study was conducted on 50 children with AIHA who were registered and followed up at the New Children's Hospital in Cairo, Egypt, between January 2010 and January 2021. The study group comprised 60% females and 40% males. Their median age was 8.25 years. All patients showed low hemoglobin levels with a mean of 5.40 ± 1.34 g/dl and a median reticulocyte count of 10 (IQR: 8-15). Twelve (24%) patients were diagnosed with Evans syndrome, and a positive Coombs test was detected in 46 patients (92%). The frequency of primary AIHA was 40%, whereas it was 60% for secondary AIHA. The first line of therapy for acute attacks was high-dose IV steroids which responded well in 38 (76%) patients. Secondary AIHA was more common among our children (60%). AIHA is more prevalent in females (60%). The clinical and laboratory characteristics matched previous reports.

Real-life use of mTOR inhibitor-based therapy in adults with autoimmune cytopenia highlights strong efficacy in relapsing/refractory multi-lineage autoimmune cytopenia.

Data on mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) in autoimmune cytopenia (AIC), in adults are scarce. We retrospectively analysed 30 cases of refractory or relapsing AIC treated with an mTORi-based therapy. Eleven warm autoimmune hemolytic anaemia, 10 autoimmune thrombocytopenia, 6 acquired pure red cell aplasia, 3 autoimmune neutropenia were included. Twenty were multilineage AIC (67%) and 21 were secondary AIC (70%). mTORi were associated with other therapies in 23 AIC (77%). Twenty-two AIC (73%) responded to mTORi-based therapy: 5 reached a partial response (17%) and 17 a complete response (57%). Survival without unfavourable outcome (failure, requirement of a new therapy, or death) was longer in multilineage AIC compared to single-lineage AIC (p = 0.049) with a median event-free survival of 48 versus 12 months. Median event-free survival was 48 months in secondary AIC and 33 months in primary AIC (p = 0.79). mTORi were discontinued in 4 patients (15%) for safety reasons and in 3 patients for patient's choice (12%). In conclusion, mTORi could be considered as an alternative or an add-on therapy in refractory or relapsing AIC in adult patients, especially in multilineage AIC.

Possible role of IL-23 inhibitor in autoimmune hemolytic anemia.

Rituximab and prednisone are commonly used treatments for autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), where the body's immune system attacks and destroys its red blood cells. However, some AIHA patients may become refractory to rituximab treatment, and this can result in continued hemolysis and persistent anemia, making it challenging for affected individuals to manage their symptoms. The underlying causes of rituximab refractoriness in AIHA patients can be complex and vary from patient to patient. Herein, we present a case of newly diagnosed warm and cold AIHA that remained in remission with an interleukin-23 inhibitor.

Molecular pharmacology in complement-mediated hemolytic disorders.

In the last decade, a deeper understanding of the pathogenesis of complement mediated hemolytic disorders, such as paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), cold agglutinin disease (CAD), warm type autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) with complement activation (wAIHA), and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), paved the way to the therapeutic shift from purely supportive approaches to complement-targeted therapies. This resulted in a significant improvement in disease management, survival, and quality of life. In this review, we will provide a snapshot of novel therapies for complement-mediated hemolytic anemias with a focus on those ready to use in clinical practice. C5 inhibitors eculizumab and the long-acting ravulizumab, are the established gold standard for untreated PNH patients, whilst the C3 inhibitor pegcetacoplan should be considered for suboptimal responders to anti-C5 drugs. Several additional compounds targeting the complement cascade at different levels (other C5 inhibitors, factor B and D inhibitors) are under active investigation with promising results. In CAD, immunosuppression with rituximab remains the first-line. However, recently FDA and EMA approved the anti-C1s monoclonal antibody, sutimlimab, that showed dramatic responses and whose regulatory approval is soon awaited in many countries. Other drugs under investigation in AIHA include the C3 inhibitor pegcetacoplan, and the anti-C1q ANX005 for warm AIHA with complement activation. Finally, aHUS is an indication for complement inhibitors. Eculizumab and ravulizumab have been approved, whilst other C5 inhibitors, and novel lectin pathway inhibitors are under active investigation in this disease.

Sutimlimab provides clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported outcomes in patients with cold agglutinin disease: Results from the randomised, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 CADENZA study.

Cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is a rare chronic autoimmune haemolytic anaemia, driven mainly by classical complement pathway activation, leading to profound fatigue and poor quality of life. In the Phase 3 CADENZA trial, sutimlimab-a C1s complement inhibitor-rapidly halted haemolysis, increased haemoglobin levels and improved fatigue versus placebo in patients with CAD without a recent history of transfusion. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) included Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) and Patient Global Impression of (fatigue) Severity (PGIS). Sutimlimab resulted in significant rapid and meaningful improvements versus placebo in PROs. From Week 1, the FACIT-Fatigue mean score increased >5 points above baseline (considered a clinically important change [CIC]). Least-squares (LS) mean change in FACIT-Fatigue score from baseline to treatment assessment timepoint was 10.8 vs. 1.9 points (sutimlimab vs. placebo; p < 0.001). Improvements in physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component scores of the SF-12 were also considered CICs (LS mean changes from baseline to Week 26: PCS 5.54 vs. 1.57 [p = 0.064]; MCS 5.65 vs. -0.48 [p = 0.065]). These findings demonstrate that in addition to improving haematologic parameters, sutimlimab treatment demonstrates significant patient-reported benefits. Study registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03347422.

Sustained inhibition of complement C1s with sutimlimab over 2 years in patients with cold agglutinin disease.

Cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is a rare, autoimmune, classical complement pathway (CP)-mediated hemolytic anemia. Sutimlimab selectively inhibits C1s of the C1 complex, preventing CP activation while leaving the alternative and lectin pathways intact. In Part A (26 weeks) of the open-label, single-arm, Phase 3 CARDINAL study in patients with CAD and a recent history of transfusion, sutimlimab demonstrated rapid effects on hemolysis and anemia. Results of the CARDINAL study Part B (2-year extension) study, described herein, demonstrated that sutimlimab sustains improvements in hemolysis, anemia, and quality of life over a median of 144 weeks of treatment. Mean last-available on-treatment values in Part B were improved from baseline for hemoglobin (12.2 g/dL on-treatment versus 8.6 g/dL at baseline), bilirubin (16.5 µmol/L on-treatment versus 52.1 µmol/L at baseline), and FACIT-Fatigue scores (40.5 on-treatment versus 32.4 at baseline). In the 9-week follow-up period after sutimlimab cessation, CP inhibition was reversed, and hemolytic markers and fatigue scores approached pre-sutimlimab values. Overall, sutimlimab was generally well tolerated in Part B. All 22 patients experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); 12 (54.5%) patients experienced ≥1 serious TEAE, including seven (31.8%) with ≥1 serious infection. Three patients discontinued due to a TEAE. No patients developed systemic lupus erythematosus or meningococcal infections. After cessation of sutimlimab, most patients reported adverse events consistent with recurrence of CAD. In conclusion, the CARDINAL 2-year results provide evidence of sustained sutimlimab effects for CAD management, but that disease activity reoccurs after treatment cessation. NCT03347396. Registered November 20, 2017.