Evaluation of an automatic approach device to the epidural space of Beagle dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the epidural anesthesia device (EPIA), which facilitates an automatic approach to location of the epidural space, with the performance of clinicians using tactile sensation and differences in pressure when inserting an epidural needle into the epidural space of a dog. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, crossover experiment. ANIMALS: A total of 14 Beagle dogs weighing 7.5 ± 2.4 kg (mean ± standard deviation). METHODS: Each dog was anesthetized three times at 2 week intervals for three anesthesiologists (two experienced, one novice) to perform 14 epidural injections (seven manual and EPIA device each). The sequence of methods was assigned randomly for each anesthesiologist. The dogs were anesthetized with medetomidine (10 µg kg-1), alfaxalone (2 mg kg-1) and isoflurane and positioned in sternal recumbency with the pelvic limbs extended cranially. Epidural puncture in the manual method was determined by pop sensation, hanging drop technique and reduced injection pressure, whereas using the device a sudden decrease in reaction force on the device was detected. A C-arm identified needle placement in the epidural space, and after administration of iohexol (0.3 mL), the needle length in the epidural space was defined as the mean value measured by three radiologists. Normality was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and significant differences between the two methods were analyzed using an independent sample t test. RESULTS: In both methods, the success rates of epidural insertion were the same at 95.2%. The length of the needle in the epidural space using the device and manual methods was 1.59 ± 0.50 and 1.68 ± 0.88 mm, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.718). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: EPIA device was comparable to human tactile sense for an epidural needle insertion in Beagle dogs. Further research should be conducted for application of the device in clinical environments.

Thoracic epidural anaesthesia vs intrathecal morphine in dogs undergoing major thoracic and abdominal surgery: clinical study.

BACKGROUND: There is scant clinical research on neuraxial analgesia in dogs undergoing major surgery. With this study we compared the perioperative analgesic effects of thoracic epidural anaesthesia (TEA) and intrathecal morphine (ITM) in dogs scheduled for thoracic or cranial abdominal surgery. The dogs received methadone and dexmedetomidine, were anaesthetized with propofol maintained with sevoflurane, and randomly assigned to receive either TEA (ropivacaine 0.5% at 0.2 mg/kg and morphine 0.1 mg/kg administered at T12-T13) or ITM (morphine 30 µg/kg administered at L6-L7). Intraoperative rescue analgesia (iRA) was fentanyl 1 µg/kg administered if heart rate or mean arterial pressure increased by 30% above the pre-stimulation level. Glasgow Pain Composite Scale score (GPCS) dictated the use of postoperative rescue analgesia (pRA) with methadone 0.2 mg/kg. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in iRA, median time to first fentanyl bolus, median fentanyl dose after surgical opening, and median GPCS score at 30 minutes (min), 1 ,2, 4, 6, and 8 hours (h) between the two groups (p<0.001; p<0.001; p<0.001; p<0.01; p<0.01; p<0.001; p<0.01; p=0.01; p=0.01, respectively). Fewer TEA than ITM group dogs required iRA during surgical opening and pRA: 5% (1/18) and 2/18 (11%), respectively, in the TEA and 83% (16/18) and 10/18 (55%), respectively, in the ITM group. Side effects were urinary retention in 3/18 (16%) TEA group dogs and 2/18 (11%) ITM group dogs and prolonged sedation in 2/18 (11%) in ITM group dogs. TEA and ITM were effective in managing perioperative pain in dogs undergoing thoracic or cranial abdominal surgery.

Comparison of cervical epidural morphine with intravenous morphine administration on antinociception in adult horses using thermal threshold testing.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the antinociceptive effects of morphine administered via cervical epidural catheter to intravenously administered morphine using a thermal threshold (TT) testing model in healthy adult horses. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, blinded experimental study. ANIMALS: A total of six university-owned adult horses. METHODS: Horses were instrumented with a cervical (C1-C2) epidural catheter and TT testing device with probes at withers and thoracic limb coronary bands. All horses underwent three TT testing cycles including cervical epidural morphine administration (treatment EpiM; 0.1 mg kg-1), systemic morphine administration (treatment SystM; 0.1 mg kg-1) and no morphine administration (treatment Control). Baseline TT was established prior to treatments, and TT was tested at 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 240, 300, 360, 420, 480, 600 and 720 minutes following treatment. Horses underwent a 5 day washout period between treatments and the order of treatment was randomized. Differences between treatments were analyzed with repeated measures anova. RESULTS: Systemic and epidural morphine administration resulted in significantly higher TT values compared with baseline and control treatment. The duration of effect was significantly longer in treatment EpiM (10-12 hours) than in treatment SystM (1.5-2.0 hours). Horses in treatment EpiM had significantly higher TT values at time points 180-600 minutes (withers) and 300-600 minutes (coronary band) than horses in treatment SystM. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Cervical epidural administration of morphine provided antinociceptive effects as measured by increased TT for 10-12 hours compared with 1.5-2.0 hours for intravenously administered morphine. No complications or adverse effects were noticed following epidural placement of a C1-C2 catheter and administration of morphine. The use of a cervical epidural catheter can be considered for analgesia administration in treatment of thoracic limb and cervical pain in the horse.

Evaluation of perfusion index as a noninvasive tool to determine epidural anesthesia effectiveness in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perfusion index (PI) as a noninvasive tool to determine effectiveness and onset of epidural anesthesia in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial. ANIMALS: A total of 21 adult dogs, aged 6.5 ± 3 years and weighing 34.9 ± 6.4 kg, undergoing a tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. METHODS: Dogs were premedicated intramuscularly with acepromazine (0.03 mg kg-1) and hydromorphone (0.1 mg kg-1) and anesthetized with intravenous propofol (to effect) and isoflurane in oxygen. A surface transflectance probe was secured to the tail base to monitor PI and a dorsal pedal artery catheter was placed for invasive blood pressure monitoring. A lumbosacral epidural was performed with the dog in sternal recumbency. Dogs were randomly assigned for inclusion of epidural morphine (0.1 mg kg-1) or morphine (0.1 mg kg-1) and lidocaine (4 mg kg-1). PI was recorded following instrumentation of each dog just prior to the epidural (baseline), at 10 minute intervals for 30 minutes, before and after the surgical skin incision and before and after completion of the osteotomy. Physiological variables and end-tidal isoflurane were recorded at the same time points. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in PI between the groups at any time point. There was a significant change in end-tidal isoflurane before and after the skin incision in the epidural morphine and epidural morphine-lidocaine groups (p = 0.04, p = 0.05, respectively) and before and after the osteotomy in each group for heart rate (p = 0.001, p = 0.04), diastolic (p = 0.01, p = 0.01) and mean arterial blood pressure (p = 0.03, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: PI did not provide an objective means for determining the onset or effectiveness of epidural anesthesia in anesthetized dogs and alternate methods of noninvasive assessment should be investigated.

Evaluation of electrical nerve stimulation to confirm sacrococcygeal epidural needle placement in dogs.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of 0.7 mA as a fixed electrical current to indicate epidural needle placement and to confirm that 0.7 mA is greater than the upper limit of the minimal electrical threshold (MET) for sacrococcygeal epidural needle placement in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. ANIMALS: A group of 20 client-owned dogs. METHODS: During general anesthesia and with standard monitoring, the presence of the patellar reflex was confirmed in all dogs. An insulated needle was inserted through the sacrococcygeal intervertebral junction, and absence of tail movement was confirmed when a fixed electrical current of 0.7 mA was applied. Then, the needle was further advanced toward the epidural space until the expected motor response was obtained - the nerve stimulation test (NST). The NST was considered positive when a motor response of the muscles of the tail was elicited but not the perineal muscles, whereas it was considered negative when no movement of the tail was evoked. The electrical current was turned to 0 mA and then increased by 0.01 mA increments until tail movement was evoked; this was recorded as the MET. In the positive NST cases, 0.05 mL cm-1 occipitococcygeal length of 2% lidocaine or 0.25-0.5% bupivacaine was administered. Epidural blockade was confirmed by the loss of patellar reflex. Descriptive statistics were used to present data. RESULTS: Sacrococcygeal epidural needle placement, corroborated by loss of the patellar reflex, was correctly predicted in 89.5% (95% confidence interval, 68.6-97.1%) of the cases. The MET was 0.22 mA (0.11-0.36). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A current of 0.7 mA is approximately twice the upper limit of the MET for epidural placement. Therefore, this study demonstrates, with a success rate of 89.5%, the adequacy of using 0.7 mA as the fixed electrical current to detect sacrococcygeal epidural needle placement in dogs.

Identification of the sacrococcygeal epidural space using the nerve stimulation test or the running-drip method in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the nerve stimulation test (group NS) with the running-drip method (group RUN) for successful identification of the sacrococcygeal (SCo) epidural space prior to drug administration in dogs. ANIMALS: A total of 62 dogs. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized clinical study. METHODS: Dogs requiring an epidural anaesthetic as part of the multimodal anaesthetic plan were randomly allocated to one of the two study groups. In group NS, the epidural space was located using an insulated needle connected to a nerve stimulator; in group RUN, the epidural space was identified using a Tuohy needle connected to a fluid bag elevated 60 cm above the spine via an administration set. The success of the technique was assessed 5 minutes after epidural injection by the disappearance of the patella reflex. Data were checked for normality, nonparametric data was analysed using a Mann-Whitney U test and success rate was analysed using a Fisher's exact test. The significance level was set at p < 0.05, and the results are presented in absolute values, percentage (95% confident interval) and median (range). RESULTS: The success in identification of the epidural space did not differ between groups NS and RUN [87.1% (70.2%-96.4%) versus 90.3% (74.2%-98%); p = 1.000]. The time required for identification of the epidural space was shorter in group RUN [26 (15-53) seconds] than in group NS [40 (19-137) seconds] (p = 0.0225). No other differences were found in any studied variables. CONCLUSION: and clinical relevance In this study, both RUN and NS techniques were successful in identifying the epidural space at the SCo intervertebral space. RUN requires no specialised equipment, can be performed rapidly and offers an alternative to the NS for use in general veterinary practice.

The use of ultrasound to assist epidural injection in obese dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of ultrasound for identifying the site for needle puncture and to determine the depth to the epidural space in obese dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study in dogs undergoing elective orthopedic surgery. ANIMALS: A group of seven obese Labrador male dogs aged 6.93 ± 2.56 years and weighing 46.5 ± 4.1 kg (mean ± standard deviation). METHODS: The anesthetic protocol for these dogs included epidural anesthesia. With the dogs anesthetized and positioned in sternal recumbency with the pelvic limbs flexed forward, ultrasound imaging was used to locate the lumbosacral intervertebral space. Intersection of dorsal and transverse lines about the probe identified the point of needle insertion. A 17 gauge, 8.9 cm Tuohy needle was inserted perpendicularly through the skin and advanced to the lumbosacral intervertebral space. The number of puncture attempts was recorded and needle depth was compared with skin to ligamentum flavum distance. RESULTS: Epidural injection was performed in all dogs at the first attempt of needle insertion. The distance from skin to epidural space was 5.95 ± 0.62 cm measured by ultrasound and 5.89 ± 0.64 cm measured with the Tuohy needle. These measurements were not different (p = 0.26). A highly significant correlation coefficient of 0.966 between measurement techniques was obtained (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Ultrasound imaging identified the point of needle insertion for lumbosacral epidural injection in seven obese dogs. The results indicate that ultrasound can be used to locate the lumbosacral intervertebral space and identify an appropriate point for needle insertion to perform epidural injection.

Evaluation of analgesic, sympathetic and motor effects of 1% and 2% lidocaine administered epidurally in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare, versus a control, the sensory, sympathetic and motor blockade of lidocaine 1% and 2% administered epidurally in bitches undergoing ovariohysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trial. ANIMALS: A total of 24 mixed-breed intact female dogs. METHODS: All dogs were administered dexmedetomidine, tramadol and meloxicam prior to general anesthesia with midazolam-propofol and isoflurane. Animals were randomly assigned for an epidural injection of lidocaine 1% (0.4 mL kg-1; group L1), lidocaine 2% (0.4 mL kg-1; group L2) or no injection (group CONTROL). Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (fR), end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (Pe'CO2), and invasive systolic (SAP), mean (MAP) and diastolic (DAP) arterial pressures were recorded every 5 minutes. Increases in physiological variables were treated with fentanyl (3 µg kg-1) intravenously (IV). Phenylephrine (1 µg kg-1) was administered IV when MAP was <60 mmHg. Postoperative pain [Glasgow Composite Pain Score - Short Form (GCPS-SF)] and return of normal ambulation were recorded at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours after extubation. RESULTS: There were no differences over time or among groups for HR, fR, Pe'CO2 and SAP. MAP and DAP were lower in epidural groups than in CONTROL (p = 0.0146 and 0.0047, respectively). There was no difference in the use of phenylephrine boluses. More fentanyl was administered in CONTROL than in L1 and L2 (p = 0.011). GCPS-SF was lower for L2 than for CONTROL, and lower in L1 than in both other groups (p = 0.001). Time to ambulation was 2 (1-2) hours in L1 and 3 (2-4) hours in L2 (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Epidural administration of lidocaine (0.4 mL kg-1) reduced fentanyl requirements and lowered MAP and DAP. Time to ambulation decreased and postoperative pain scores were improved by use of 1% lidocaine compared with 2% lidocaine.

Effect of phentolamine mesylate on regression of lidocaine-epinephrine epidural anaesthesia in sheep.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of epidural phentolamine on the duration of anaesthesia following epidural injection of lidocaine-epinephrine. STUDY DESIGN: Blinded randomized experimental study. ANIMALS: A group of 12 adult ewes weighing 25.7 ± 2.3 kg and aged 8-9 months. METHODS: All sheep were administered epidural lidocaine (approximately 4 mg kg-1) and epinephrine (5 µg mL-1). Of these, six sheep were randomized into three epidural treatments, separated by 1 week, administered 30 minutes after lidocaine-epinephrine: SAL: normal saline, PHE1: phentolamine (1 mg) and PHE2: phentolamine (2 mg). The other six sheep were administered only epidural lidocaine-epinephrine: treatment LIDEP. Each injection was corrected to 5 mL using 0.9% saline. Noxious stimuli were pinpricks with a hypodermic needle and skin pinch with haemostatic forceps to determine the onset and duration of sensory and motor block. Heart rate, noninvasive mean arterial pressure (MAP), respiratory rate and rectal temperature were recorded. RESULTS: The onset times were not different among treatments. Duration of sensory block was significantly shorter in SAL (57.5 ± 6.2 minutes), PHE1 (60.7 ± 9.0 minutes) and PHE2 (62.0 ± 6.7 minutes) than in LIDEP (81.7 ± 13.4 minutes) (p < 0.05). Duration of motor blockade was significantly shorter in PHE1 (59.4 ± 5.4 minutes) and PHE2 (54.3 ± 4.0 minutes) than in SAL (84.8 ± 7.0 minutes) and LIDEP (91.5 ± 18.2 minutes) (p < 0.01). MAP in PHE2 was decreased at 10 minutes after administration of phentolamine (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Epidural administration of 5 mL normal saline after epidural injection of lidocaine-epinephrine reduced the duration of sensory but not motor block in sheep. Epidural administration of phentolamine diluted to the final volume of 5 mL diminished both the duration of sensory and motor block in sheep administered epidural lidocaine-epinephrine.

Comparison of calculated lumbosacral epidural volumes of injectate using a dose regimen based on body weight versus length of the vertebral column in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare volumes for epidural injection calculated on body weight or the length from sacrococcygeal space to occipital crest in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. ANIMALS: A total of 431 dogs weighing mean ± standard deviation (range) 24.6 ± 16.1 (1.3-88.0) kg and with vertebral column length 67.6 ± 38.4 (24.8-119.4) cm. METHODS: Dogs were separated into specific weight groups and body condition scores (BCS; 1-5): small (<10 kg), medium 10 to <25 kg), large (25 to <45 kg) and giant (≥45 kg). Calculations for a lumbosacral epidural dose were 0.2 mL kg-1 and for vertebral column length: 0.05 mL cm-1 (<50 cm), 0.07 mL cm-1 (50 to <70 cm), 0.08 mL cm-1 (70 to <80 cm), and 0.11 mL cm-1 (≥80 cm). A split plot anova (p < 0.05) with weight, length and BCS as factors was used. RESULTS: A significantly larger volume was calculated for length than for weight in small (p < 0.0001-0.0003, BCS 2-5), medium (p < 0.0001-0.0076, BCS 2-5), and large dogs (p ≤ 0.0007-0.0019, BCS 2,3). In large (BCS 4,5) and giant dogs (BCS 2,3), both calculated volumes were similar. In giant dogs (BCS 4,5), a significantly smaller volume was calculated for length (p ≤ 0.0002-0.0165). Regardless of BCS, small (2.18 versus 1.12), medium (3.99 versus 3.16), and large dogs (7.38 versus 6.82) had larger calculated volumes (mL) for length than for weight (p < 0.0001), whereas giant dogs (10.04 versus 10.91) had smaller calculated volumes. CONCLUSIONS: and clinical relevance Mathematically, the epidural volume of injectate varies with the calculation method and is affected by BCS. Small and medium dogs have larger calculated volumes based on length than on weight, and this difference tends to disappear or revert as size increases.

Evaluation of methadone concentrations in bitches and in umbilical cords after epidural or systemic administration for caesarean section: A randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To measure plasma methadone concentrations in bitches and the umbilical cords of their puppies after systemic or epidural administration. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, clinical study. ANIMALS: A total of 27 healthy pregnant female dogs undergoing caesarean section, 4.3 ± 2.3 years of age and weighing 19.9 ± 13.2 kg. METHODS: The dogs were randomly divided into three groups: 1) intramuscular methadone (0.3 mg kg-1) (group MET; n = 9); 2) epidural methadone (0.1 mg kg-1) (group METEPI; n = 9); and 3) epidural lidocaine (4.4 mg kg-1) [group CON (control group); n = 9]. Ten minutes before induction, methadone was administered intramuscularly to the group MET dogs. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane. Cardiovascular and respiratory parameters were monitored throughout the anaesthesia. After induction, epidural anaesthesia was administered to dogs in groups METEPI and CON. Before any treatment (T0) and, as soon as the last foetus was removed from the uterus (T1), venous blood samples were collected from each dog into heparinized tubes; the umbilical cords were collected and stored at -80 °C until pharmacological analysis was carried out. The samples were analysed using ultra performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: The cardiorespiratory parameters of the bitches and of the puppies at birth, and the Apgar scores did not differ significantly between groups. At T1 both the median maternal methadone plasma concentration and the median methadone umbilical cord concentration were higher in group MET compared to group METEPI (p = 0.0018 and p = 0.004, respectively). The maternal plasma concentration was higher than the concentration in the umbilical cords (p = 0.05) in group METEPI but not in group MET (p = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Epidural methadone (0.1 mg kg-1) administered to bitches undergoing caesarean section is associated with lower umbilical cord methadone concentrations as compared with intramuscularly administered methadone at higher dosages (0.3 mg kg-1).

Cranial versus caudal thoracic epidural anesthesia using three volumes of lidocaine in conscious Beagle dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of epidural injection of three volumes of lidocaine injected at the third (T3) or eleventh thoracic vertebra (T11) in conscious dogs to induce thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) and to measure the epidural dispersion of iohexol under similar conditions. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective crossover experiment. ANIMALS: A group of five Beagle dogs weighing 10.4 ± 0.5 kg (mean ± standard deviation). METHODS: Each dog was anesthetized twice, separated by 1 week, for inserting an epidural catheter at the lumbosacral space and advancing the tip to T3 (treatment TEAT3) or T11 (treatment TEAT11). For each treatment, three volumes of 2% lidocaine (0.05, 0.10 and 0.20 mL kg-1) were administered at 24 hour intervals, and sensory blockade (SB) of dermatomes was estimated by pinching the skin with mosquito forceps. Under identical conditions of injection volume and site, iohexol was administered 3 hours after lidocaine injection to identify epidural distribution (ED) using computed tomography. The effects of injection site and volume on SB of thoracic dermatomes and ED were analyzed using a linear mixed model (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Thoracic SB and ED significantly increased as the volume increased (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively), and significantly decreased in TEAT3 than in TEAT11 (p = 0.011 and p = 0.002, respectively). Cervical SB was obtained in three of five dogs in TEAT3 and two of five dogs in TEAT11 injected with 0.20 mL kg-1. One dog showed temporary inspiratory stridor probably caused by bilateral laryngeal paralysis, but no hypoxia. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: TEA induced at T3 produced less thoracic SB than did TEA at T11 with the same volumes of lidocaine. The cervical SB obtained with the highest volume of lidocaine may increase the risk of laryngeal paralysis and pulmonary aspiration.

A retrospective analysis of the epidural use of bupivacaine 0.0625-0.125% with opioids in bitches undergoing cesarean section.

Epidural anesthesia, often used during cesarean surgery, can exacerbate hypotension from general anesthesia and delay discharge due to motor block. Decreasing the local anesthetic dose might reduce those complications. Cases of dogs undergoing cesarean section that were anesthetized without epidural (n = 29) (control) and dogs with low-dose epidural bupivacaine with fentanyl or buprenorphine (n = 37) were reviewed. The incidence of hypotension was equal between groups. Intraoperative opioids were administered more to control (93%) than to treated dogs (18%; P < 0.0001). Epidural bupivacaine 0.0625-0.125% combined with an opioid reduced the use of intraoperative opioids and did not exacerbate arterial hypotension during cesarean section in anesthetized dogs.

Analyse rétrospective de l'utilisation de bupivacaine 0,0625­0,125 % avec des opioïdes lors d'épidurale chez des chiennes soumises à une césarienne. L'anesthésie épidurale, souvent utilisée lors d'une césarienne, peut exacerber l'hypotension due à l'anesthésie générale et retarder le congé à cause d'un bloc moteur. Une diminution de la dose d'anesthésique local pourrait réduire ces complications. Une revue fut effectuée des cas de chiennes soumises à une césarienne et anesthésiées sans épidurale (n = 29) (témoin) et des chiennes avec une épidurale en utilisant une faible dose de bupivacaine avec du fentanyl ou de la buprenorphine (n = 37). L'incidence d'hypotension était égale entre les groupes. Des opioïdes intra-opératoires furent administrés plus fréquemment chez les témoins (93 %) que chez les animaux traités (18 %; P < 0,001). De la bupivacaine 0,0625­0,125 % en épidurale combinée à un opioïde réduisit l'utilisation d'opioïdes intra-opératoires et n'a pas exacerbé l'hypotension artérielle durant la césarienne chez des chiennes anesthésiées.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).

Epidural anesthesia in Egyptian water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis): a comparison of lidocaine, xylazine and a combination of lidocaine and xylazine.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the analgesic effects of a combination of lidocaine and xylazine to lidocaine or xylazine administered alone for epidural anesthesia in Egyptian water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, 'blinded', crossover experimental study. ANIMALS: A total of 12 female Egyptian water buffalo. METHODS: Buffalo were randomly assigned to one of three epidural treatments administered through the sacrococcygeal joint: a local anesthetic (2% lidocaine, 0.22 mg kg-1), an alpha-2-adrenergic agonist (xylazine, 0.1 mg kg-1) or a combination of both drugs in a crossover fashion with a 14 day washout period. The total volume of each treatment was fixed at 7.0 mL by adding 0.9% NaCl. Onset, maximal effect, and duration of epidural anesthesia were recorded. RESULTS: Caudal epidural anesthesia was easily performed, and all three treatments produced local anesthesia of the tail and perineal structures of standing buffalo. Onset of epidural anesthesia was faster (p < 0.05) with lidocaine (3.4 ± 0.9 minutes) than with xylazine (9.1 ± 1.1 minutes) or lidocaine-xylazine (6.4 ± 1.1 minutes). The maximal effect of epidural anesthesia was reached faster (p < 0.05) with lidocaine (5.9 ± 0.64 minutes) than xylazine (14.4 ± 1.1 minutes) or lidocaine-xylazine (12.9 ± 0.64 minutes). The duration of epidural anesthesia was longer (p < 0.05) with lidocaine-xylazine (145.8 ± 3.3 minutes) than either lidocaine (118.4 ± 2.7 minutes) or xylazine (102.1 ± 3.7 minutes) administered alone. None of the treatments produced ataxia. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Caudal epidural anesthesia was easily performed in Egyptian water buffalo by administering a local anesthetic, an alpha-2-adrenergic agonist or a combination of both drugs through the sacrococcygeal joint. Administering a combination of lidocaine and xylazine provided a longer duration of anesthesia than either drug used alone. Epidural xylazine provided a useful level of systemic sedation without ataxia.

What is the evidence? The issue of verifying correct needle position during epidural anaesthesia in dogs.

OBJECTIVES: To review the methods for verifying the needle position while performing epidural anaesthesia in dogs, and to discuss the advantages, disadvantages, usefulness and reliability of each technique in the experimental and clinical research setting. DATABASES USED: PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and the Basel University Library online catalogues; the latter, which was provided by the University of Berne, were used as databases. The results were filtered manually based on the titles and abstracts in order to narrow the field. CONCLUSIONS: Besides some drawbacks, including the potential side effects of contrast medium injection, which may limit its routine use in clinical patients, epidurography should still be regarded as one of the most reliable techniques to verify needle position in dogs. Ultrasonography, electrical nerve stimulation, loss of resistance and the hanging drop technique are regarded as less invasive than epidurography and, for this reason, their use may be more applicable to clinical patients. However, these methods have been described in only a few published reports, all of which involved a limited number of dogs. Finally, the detection of epidural pressure waves has been investigated more extensively in dogs, and the findings of these studies suggest that this technique may be used to verify epidural needle placement for experimental and clinical research, on condition that all the negative subjects are excluded from the study.

Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block: cadaveric study in foxes (Vulpes vulpes).

OBJECTIVE: To describe an ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block in canidae. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, experimental, cadaveric study. ANIMALS: Twelve thawed fox cadavers. METHODS: A 15 MHz linear transducer was used to visualize the paravertebral space at the level of the fifth thoracic vertebrae. Iohexol (300 mg mL-1) at 0.2 mL kg-1 was injected into the right and left paravertebral spaces under ultrasound guidance using a Tuohy needle. The needle was advanced in a lateral to medial direction using an in-plane technique. Injections were performed by two operators, each performing 12 injections in six fox cadavers. A thoracic computed tomography was then performed and evaluated by a single operator. The following features were recorded: paravertebral contrast location (yes/no), length of contrast column (number of intercostal spaces), location of contrast relative to the fifth thoracic vertebrae (cranial/caudal/mixed), epidural contrast contamination (yes/no), pleural contrast contamination (yes/no) and mediastinal contrast contamination (yes/no). RESULTS: All injections resulted in paravertebral contrast distribution (24/24). The mean length of the contrast column was five intercostal spaces. Contrast spread was caudal to the injection site in 54% (7/24), cranial in 29% (4/24) and mixed in 17% (3/24). Pleural contamination was observed in 50% (12/24) of injections; 42% (10/24) and 4% (1/24) of the injections resulted in mediastinal and epidural contamination, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Injection of the paravertebral space in canidae is possible using the technique described. Possible complications include epidural, pleural and mediastinal contamination. To establish clinical efficacy and safety of this technique, further studies are required.

Comparison of intratesticular lidocaine, sacrococcygeal epidural lidocaine and intravenous methadone in cats undergoing castration: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blind clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare three analgesic protocols for feline castration. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical study. ANIMALS: Forty-nine client-owned cats. METHODS: Cats were injected with intramuscular (IM) dexmedetomidine (15 µg kg-1) and alfaxalone (3 mg kg-1) and assigned randomly to one of three treatment groups. Group ITL (n = 15) were administered intratesticular 2% lidocaine (0.05 mL each testicle), group SCL (n = 15) a sacrococcygeal epidural injection of 2% lidocaine (0.1 mL kg-1) and group IVM (n = 19) intravenous (IV) methadone (0.3 mg kg-1), before surgery. Cardiorespiratory variables were recorded. In case of autonomic nociceptive response, IV fentanyl (2 µg kg-1) was administered. During recovery, time from IM atipamezole (75 µg kg-1, administered at the end of surgery) to sternal recumbency and to active interaction was recorded. Quality of recovery was assessed using a simple descriptive scale. Postoperative analgesia was evaluated using a visual analogue scale and the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale (MCPS) at return of active interaction and then 1, 2 and 3 hours later. RESULTS: The three analgesic protocols were comparable in terms of intraoperative fentanyl and propofol requirement. Cardiorespiratory variables stayed within normal ranges in the majority of the cases, although group IVM had the lowest intraoperative respiratory rate (p = 0.0009). No differences were detected between groups in UNESP-Botucatu MCPS scores (p = 0.21). However, group ITL showed higher visual analogue scale score than group IVM (p = 0.001). Four cats enrolled in group ITL, as well as three of group SCL and one of group IVM, required rescue analgesics before the completion of pain assessment. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Intratesticular and sacrococcygeal epidural lidocaine injections could be regarded as good alternatives to systemic opioids in cats undergoing castration, although the benefits of these techniques seem to be of shorter duration than IV methadone.

Comparison of the hanging-drop technique and running-drip method for identifying the epidural space in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the running-drip and hanging-drop techniques for locating the epidural space in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, clinical trial. ANIMALS: Forty-five healthy dogs requiring epidural anaesthesia. METHODS: Dogs were randomized into four groups and administered epidural anaesthesia in sternal (S) or lateral (L) recumbency. All blocks were performed by the same person using Tuohy needles with either a fluid-prefilled hub (HDo) or connected to a drip set attached to a fluid bag elevated 60 cm (RDi). The number of attempts, 'pop' sensation, clear drop aspiration or fluid dripping, time to locate the epidural space (TTLES) and presence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were recorded. A morphine-bupivacaine combination was injected after positive identification. The success of the block was assessed by experienced observers based on perioperative usage of rescue analgesia. Data were checked for normality. Binomial variables were analysed with the chi-squared or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Non-parametric data were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. Normal data were studied with an anova followed by a Tukey's means comparison for groups of the same size. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: Lateral recumbency HDo required more attempts (six of 11 dogs required more than one attempt) than SRDi (none of 11 dogs) (p = 0.0062). Drop aspiration was observed more often in SHDo (nine of 11 dogs) than in LHDo (two of 11 dogs) (p = 0.045). Mean (range) TTLES was longer in LHDo [47 (18-82) seconds] than in SHDo [20 (14-79) seconds] (p = 0.006) and SRDi [(34 (17-53) seconds] (p = 0.038). There were no differences in 'pop' sensation, presence of CSF, rescue analgesia or pain scores between the groups. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The running-drip method is a useful and fast alternative technique for identifying the epidural space in dogs. The hanging-drop technique in lateral recumbency was more difficult to perform than the other methods, requiring more time and attempts.

Analgesic and physiological effect of electroacupuncture combined with epidural lidocaine in goats.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate physiological and antinociceptive effects of electroacupuncture (EA) with lidocaine epidural nerve block in goats. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective experimental trial. ANIMALS: Forty-eight hybrid male goats weighing 27 ± 2 kg. METHODS: The goats were randomly assigned to six groups: L2.2, epidural lidocaine (2.2 mg kg-1); L4.4, epidural lidocaine (4.4 mg kg-1); EA; EA-L1.1, EA with epidural lidocaine (1.1 mg kg-1); EA-L2.2, EA with epidural lidocaine (2.2 mg kg-1); and EA-L4.4, EA with epidural lidocaine (4.4 mg kg-1). EA was administered for 120 minutes. Epidural lidocaine was administered 25 minutes after EA started. Nociceptive thresholds of flank and thigh regions, abdominal muscle tone, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory frequency (fR) and rectal temperature were recorded at 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 minutes. RESULTS: Lidocaine dose-dependently increased nociceptive thresholds. There were no differences in nociceptive thresholds between L4.4 and EA from 30 to 120 minutes. The threshold in EA-L2.2 was lower than in EA-L4.4 from 30 to 120 minutes, but higher than in EA-L1.1 from 30 to 150 minutes or in L4.4 from 30 to 180 minutes. The abdominal muscle tone in EA-L2.2 was higher at 30 minutes, but lower at 90 and 120 minutes than at 0 minutes. There were no differences in muscle tone between L4.4 and L2.2 or EA-L4.4, and between any two of the three EA-lidocaine groups from 0 to 180 minutes. The fR and HR decreased in L4.4 at 60 and 90 minutes compared with 0 minutes. No differences in fR, HR, MAP and temperature among the groups occurred from 30 to 180 minutes. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: EA combined with 2.2 mg kg-1 epidural lidocaine provides better antinociceptive effect than 4.4 mg kg-1 epidural lidocaine alone in goats. EA provided antinociception and allowed a decrease in epidural lidocaine dose.