Synthesis and In Vitro Pharmacological Evaluation of 5-(Alkoxymethyl)-2-(3-alkylamino-2-hydroxypropoxy)phenylethanones Related to Acebutolol and Celiprolol.

The structure-activity relationships of 13 analogs of aryloxyaminopropanol type derived from 2-hydroxyphenylethanone as potential ß-blockers are described. The synthesized compounds possess an isopropyl or a tert-butyl group in the hydrophilic part of the molecule and an alkoxymethyl substitution in the lipophilic moiety. The target compounds were prepared by an established four-step method and their structures were confirmed by interpretation of their UV, IR, (1) H NMR and (13) C NMR spectra, and by elemental analysis. The ß-adrenolytic efficacy of the prepared racemic compounds was determined on isolated guinea pig atria (ß1 ) and trachea (ß2 ) and expressed as pA2 values against isoprenaline tachycardia. The assumed cardioselectivity was expressed as ß1 /ß2 ratio and the values of compounds with an alkoxy group (CH3 O, iC3 H5 O, C5 H11 O, CH2 CHCH2 O, CH3 OCH2 CH2 O) in the lipophilic part and with tert-butyl in the hydrophilic part of the molecule were found to be comparable or higher than those of the standards acebutolol and celiprolol. All evaluated substances at a concentration of 10(-7) mol/dm(3) showed also negative chronotropic effects.

A vasodilating ß1 blocker celiprolol inhibits muscular release of uric acid precursor in patients with essential hypertension.

Although nonvasodilating ß1 blockers increase the levels of uric acid in serum, it is not known whether vasodilating ß1 blockers have a similar effect. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of celiprolol on the release of hypoxanthine, a uric acid precursor, from muscles after an exercise. We used the semi-ischemic forearm test to examine the release of lactate (ΔLAC), ammonia (ΔAmm), and hypoxanthine (ΔHX) before and 4, 10, and 60 min after an exercise in 18 hypertensive patients as well as 4 normotensive subjects. Before celiprolol treatment, all the levels of ΔHX and ΔAmm, and ΔLAC were increased by semi-ischemic exercise in hypertensive patients, and the increases were remarkably larger than those in normotensive subjects. Celiprolol decreased both systolic and diastolic pressure. It also decreased the levels of ΔHX and ΔAmm without changes in ΔLAC after an exercise. These findings also were confirmed by summation of each metabolite (ΣΔMetabolites). Celiprolol caused a marginal decrease of serum uric acid, but the difference was not statistically significant. On the other hand, nonvasodilating ß1 blockers did not suppress the levels of ΔHX and ΔAmm, whereas they significantly increased ΔLAC after an exercise. Celiprolol improved energy metabolism in skeletal muscles. It suppressed HX production and consequently did not adversely affect serum uric acid levels.

Celiprolol induces ß(3)-adrenoceptors-dependent relaxation in isolated porcine coronary arteries.

In porcine coronary arteries (PCAs), celiprolol, a selective ß(1)-adrenoceptors antagonist, induces vasodilatation by an endothelium- and nitric oxide (NO)-dependent pathway. However, the mechanisms of that vascular effect have not been precisely established. ß(3)-Adrenoceptors have been shown to be involved in the relaxation per se of various vascular beds, including coronary vessels. Thus, we evaluated (i) the presence of ß(3)-adrenoceptors in the PCA and (ii) their role in celiprolol-induced vasodilatation. PCA rings were placed in organ baths and preconstricted with KCl. All experiments were performed in the presence of nadolol (a ß(1)/ß(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist). Cumulative concentration-response curves to SR 58611A and ICI 215001 (2 ß(3)-adrenoceptor agonists) and to celiprolol were constructed. We also used semiquantitative reverse transcription - polymerase chain reaction, which clearly showed the presence of ß(3)-adrenoceptor transcripts. SR 58611A, ICI 215001, and celiprolol induced concentration-dependent relaxations in PCA rings. SR 58611A-induced relaxation was almost abolished after removal of endothelium or pretreatment with L-NAME (a NO synthase inhibitor). The vasorelaxations induced by SR 58611A and celiprolol were inhibited in the presence of SR 59230A and L-748337 (2 selective ß(3)-adrenoceptor antagonists). We showed (i) that PCAs possess functional ß(3)-adrenoceptors mediating endothelium- and NO-dependent relaxation, and (ii) that celiprolol exerts a ß(3)-adrenoceptor agonistic activity in this vascular bed.

Bisoprolol versus celiprolol on dynamic hyperinflation, cardiopulmonary exercise and domiciliary safety in COPD: a single-centre, randomised, crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is frequently associated with cardiovascular disease. The utility of beta-blockers for treating patients with COPD may be beneficial, but their safety remains uncertain, including worsening of dynamic hyperinflation (DH) during exercise. We hypothesised that among cardioselective beta-blockers celiprolol, due to its partial beta-2 agonist activity, may be safer than bisoprolol on exercise DH. METHODS: We measured isotime inspiratory capacity (IC) during cycle endurance testing in eleven moderate-severe COPD subjects, alongside other non-invasive cardiopulmonary exercise, bioreactance cardiac output, pulmonary function, biomarkers and daily domiciliary measures. Participants received titrated doses of either bisoprolol (maximim 5 mg) or celiprolol (maximum 400 mg) in randomised crossover fashion, each over 4 weeks. RESULTS: Clinically relevant DH occurred between resting and exercise isotime IC but showed no significant difference with either beta-blocker compared with post-run-in pooled baseline or between treatments. There were no other significant differences observed for remaining exercise ventilatory; non-invasive cardiac output; resting pulmonary function; beta-2 receptor and cardiac biomarkers; domiciliary pulmonary function, oxygen saturation and symptom outcomes, either between treatments or compared with baseline. No significant adverse effects occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Significant DH in moderate-severe COPD subjects was no different between bisoprolol or celiprolol or versus baseline. A broad spectrum of other non-invasive cardiopulmonary and domiciliary safety outcomes was equally reassuring. Bronchoprotection with a concomitant long-acting muscarinic antagonist might be an important safety measure in this context. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02380053.

In vitro response of tracheal smooth muscle from hyperresponsive guinea pigs to celiprolol.

BACKGROUND: The use of beta-blockers is limited by adverse effects such as bronchospasm in asthmatics. Third generation beta-blockers such as celiprolol may show better respiratory tolerability because they lack beta-blocker induced broncho-constriction. METHOD: Effect of celiprolol on the histamine induced contraction of tracheal muscle strips prepared from ovalbumin-sensitised guinea pigs was studied. Using oxygenated Krebs-Henseleit solution as the nutrient medium, the trachealis muscle activity was measured with isometric force displacement transducer and recorded on 4-channel Oscillograph. RESULT: Celiprolol 10(-4) M shifted the concentration-response curve of histamine downwards and to the right. Mean of amplitude of contraction, percent responses and deviations when compared with the control group were significantly different (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Celiprolol antagonised histamine-induced contractions of tracheal muscle of guinea pigs. So it may be considered safe in patients with asthma. However, further clinical evaluation and exploratory work is required.

Celiprolol but not losartan improves the biomechanical integrity of the aorta in a mouse model of vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.

AIMS: Antihypertensive drugs are included in the medical therapy of vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS). The ß-blocker celiprolol has been suggested to prevent arterial damage in vEDS, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. It is also unknown whether the widely used angiotensin II receptor type 1 antagonist losartan has a therapeutic effect in vEDS. Here, we evaluated the impact of celiprolol and losartan on the biomechanical integrity of the vEDS thoracic aorta. METHODS AND RESULTS: We established a new approach to measure the maximum tensile force at rupture of uniaxially stretched murine thoracic aortic rings. In a vEDS model, which we (re-)characterized here at molecular level, heterozygous mice showed a significant reduction in the rupture force compared to wild-type mice, reflecting the increased mortality due to aortic rupture. For the assessment of treatment effects, heterozygous mice at 4 weeks of age underwent a 4-week treatment with celiprolol, losartan, and, as a proof-of-concept drug, the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor doxycycline. Compared to age- and sex-matched untreated heterozygous mice, treatment with doxycycline or celiprolol resulted in a significant increase of rupture force, whereas no significant change was detected upon losartan treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In a vEDS model, celiprolol or doxycycline, but not losartan, can improve the biomechanical integrity of the aortic wall, thereby potentially reducing the risk of dissection and rupture. As doxycycline is a broad-spectrum antibiotic with considerable side effects, celiprolol may be more suitable for a long-term therapy and thus rather indicated for the medication of patients with vEDS.

Effects of the antioxidative beta-blocker celiprolol on endothelial progenitor cells in hypertensive rats.

BACKGROUND: Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) derived from bone marrow migrate to areas of endothelial damage and repair them. EPC function is impaired by oxidative stress. We examined the effects of an antioxidative beta1-adrenoceptor blocker on the number and function of EPCs in hypertensive rats. METHODS: Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) and Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats were fed diets loaded with high salt. The SHRs were treated with celiprolol or atenolol for 2 weeks. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (MNCs) were separated, subjected to flow cytometric analysis to determine the number of circulating EPCs, and cultured to quantify EPC colony formation. EPC migration was evaluated in migration assay chambers. EPC senescence was evaluated using beta-galactosidase assay. Oxidative stress of EPCs was evaluated using thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance (TBARS) assay. The expression of nicotinamine adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAD(P)H) oxidase component mRNAs in the renal cortex, aorta, and heart were evaluated by real-time PCR. RESULTS: The number, colony formation, and migration of EPCs in SHRs were significantly lower than those in WKY rats. TBARS scores in EPCs from SHRs were significantly higher than those from WKY rats. Celiprolol increased the number of circulating EPCs and stimulated EPC colony formation and migration, while decreasing EPC senescence. Celiprolol inhibited oxidation in EPCs from SHRs, and decreased the expression of NAD(P)H oxidase component mRNAs in the renal cortex, aorta, and heart. CONCLUSION: EPCs are impaired in SHRs in response to oxidative stress. Celiprolol decreases oxidative stress in hypertension in vivo and improves EPC numbers and function. It appears, therefore, that celiprolol may exert beneficial cardiovascular effects through its antioxidative properties.

beta1 antagonist and beta2 agonist, celiprolol, restores the impaired endothelial dependent and independent responses and decreased TNFalpha in rat with type II diabetes.

UNLABELLED: The effect of beta antagonists in the diabetic vascular lesion is controversial. We investigated the effect of celiprolol hydrochloride, a beta1 antagonist and mild beta2 agonist, on the lesions and function in type II male Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) diabetic rats. OLETF rats were fed regular chow with or without atenolol (25 mg/kg/day) or celiprolol (100 mg/kg/day) treatment (group DM, no treatment; group DM-a, atenolol treatment; group DM-c, celiprolol treatment), and treatment was continued for 31 days. Separately, normoglycemic control rats, LETO, were prepared as group C. On day 3, endothelial cells of the right internal carotid artery were removed by balloon injury, and the rats were evaluated 4 weeks after balloon injury. The plasma glucose and lipid levels were unchanged throughout the treatment period. Intimal thickening was observed in the right carotid artery in the DM and DM-a groups; however, little thickening was observed in those of DM-c rats. Acetylcholine-induced NO-dependent relaxation in arteries was improved in DM-c rats compared with DM and DM-a rats (maximum relaxation DM 30.8+/-4.5, DM-a 37.4+/-3.9, DM-c 48.8+/-4.6%, *P<0.05 vs. DM for DM-c rats). Tone-related basal NO release and acetylcholine-induced NO-dependent relaxation in the arteries and plasma NO(x) (sum of NO(2)(-) and NO(3)(-)) were greater in DM-c and C groups than in DM and DM-a groups. The serum TNFalpha levels did not increase in DM-c rats compared with those of the DM or DM-a groups, and were comparable with those of group C. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, Celiprolol improves endothelial function in the arteries of OLETF rats, and further restore it 4 weeks after endothelial denudation in the arteries of OLETF rats. NO and O(2)(-) may have a role in the important underlying mechanisms by reducing the TNFalpha levels.

Celiprolol, a vasodilatory beta-blocker, inhibits pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy and prevents the transition to heart failure via nitric oxide-dependent mechanisms in mice.

BACKGROUND: The blockade of beta-adrenergic receptors reduces both mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure, but the cellular mechanism remains unclear. Celiprolol, a selective beta(1)-blocker, was reported to stimulate the expression of endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) in the heart, and NO levels have been demonstrated to be related to myocardial hypertrophy and heart failure. Thus, we aimed to clarify whether celiprolol attenuates both myocardial hypertrophy and heart failure via the NO-signal pathway. METHODS AND RESULTS: In rat neonatal cardiac myocytes, celiprolol inhibited protein synthesis stimulated by either isoproterenol or phenylephrine, which was partially suppressed by N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME). Four weeks after transverse aortic constriction (TAC) in C57BL/6 male mice, the ratio of heart weight to body weight (mg/g) (8.70+/-0.42 in TAC, 6.61+/-0.44 with celiprolol 100 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1) PO, P<0.01) and the ratio of lung weight to body weight (mg/g) (10.27+/-1.08 in TAC, 7.11+/-0.70 with celiprolol 100 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1) PO, P<0.05) were lower and LV fractional shortening was higher in the celiprolol-treated groups than in the TAC group. All of these improvements were blunted by L-NAME. Celiprolol treatment significantly increased myocardial eNOS and activated phosphorylation of eNOS. Myocardial mRNA levels of natriuretic peptide precursor type B and protein inhibitor of NO synthase, which were increased in the TAC mice, were decreased in the celiprolol-treated mice. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicated that celiprolol attenuates cardiac myocyte hypertrophy both in vitro and in vivo and halts the process leading from hypertrophy to heart failure. These effects are mediated by a selective beta1-adrenergic receptor blockade and NO-dependent pathway.

Influence of chronic exposure to high concentrations of D-glucose and long-term beta-blocker treatment on intracellular calcium concentrations of porcine aortic endothelial cells.

Clinical observations indicate that diabetes leads to micro- and macroangiopathy involving endothelial dysfunction. Because recent studies indicate an antiangiopathic effect of celiprolol, but not of metoprolol, in type 1 diabetes, we investigated the direct influence of exposure to high D-glucose concentrations on endothelial cells and the possible effects of both beta-blockers. Nine different chronic treatments were carried out on cultured porcine aortic endothelial cells: 1) 5 mmol/l D-glucose ("normoglycemic" cells), 2) 5 mmol/l D-glucose plus 15 mmol/l L-glucose (osmotic control), 3) 5 mmol/l D-glucose plus 0.5 micromol/l celiprolol, 4) 5 mmol/l D-glucose plus 0.05 micromol/l metoprolol, 5) 5 mmol/l D-glucose plus 0.5 micromol/l celiprolol plus 5 micromol/l propranolol, 6) 20 mmol/l D-glucose ("hyperglycemic" cells), 7) 20 mmol/l D-glucose plus 0.5 micromol/l celiprolol, 8) 20 mmol/l D-glucose plus 0.05 micromol/l metoprolol, and 9) 20 mmol/l D-glucose plus 0.5 micromol/l celiprolol plus 5 micromol/l propranolol. Using the Fura-2 technique, application of either 1 nmol/l bradykinin or 1 micromol/l ATP to the normoglycemic endothelial cells led to a significant increase in intracellular calcium, whereas the hyperglycemic cells showed significantly less reactivity to both agents. Exposure of endothelial cells to L-glucose did not show any difference to normoglycemic controls. Coadministration of 20 mmol/l glucose and celiprolol demonstrated that the alteration of the calcium signal induced by high D-glucose concentrations could be significantly antagonized with celiprolol. In contrast, coincubation with metoprolol failed to normalize the calcium signal. This effect of celiprolol was completely abolished in the presence of propranolol. In normoglycemic cells, none of the beta-blockers influenced the intracellular calcium response to bradykinin or ATP. These results indicate that chronic treatment with high D-glucose concentrations leads to an impairment of calcium signaling, which might be ameliorated by celiprolol.

Effects of vasodilatory beta-adrenoceptor antagonists on endothelium-derived nitric oxide release in rat kidney.

The mechanisms for the vascular actions of vasodilatory beta-blockers remain undetermined. For some kinds of beta-blockers, the involvement of nitric oxide (NO) has been suggested. We studied the effects of vasodilatory beta-blockers on renal perfusion pressure (RPP) and NO release in the rat kidney. Infusion of bopindolol, celiprolol, and nebivolol caused a dose-dependent reduction in RPP and an increase in NO release (RPP: bopindolol 10(-6) mol/L, -23+/-2%; celiprolol 10(-4) mol/L, -27+/-2%; nebivolol 10(-5) mol/L, -35+/-3%; NO: bopindolol 10(-6) mol/L, +33+/-2; celiprolol 10(-4) mol/L, +41+/-2; nebivolol 10(-5) mol/L, +45+/-5 fmol. min-1. g kidney-1, mean+/-SEM). Metergoline (10(-6) mol/L), a 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1/2 antagonist, or NAN-190 (10(-6) mol/L), a 5-HT1A antagonist, almost completely abolished the vasorelaxation and NO release caused by bopindolol, celiprolol, and nebivolol. However, neither propranolol nor bisoprolol decreased RPP. Celiprolol and nebivolol caused vasodilation in the rat thoracic aorta, and it was markedly reduced by endothelial denudation, Nomega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (10(-4) mol/L), or NAN-190 (10(-6) mol/L). In deoxycorticosterone acetate-salt hypertensive rats, 4-week administration of celiprolol (50 mg. kg-1. d-1 IV) restored the responses regarding RPP and NO release to acetylcholine. These results suggest that several beta-blockers exert their vasodilatory action through the 5-HT1A receptor/NO pathway and that treatment with these beta-blockers may protect against endothelial injury in hypertension.

Celiprolol stimulates endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression and improves myocardial remodeling in deoxycorticosterone acetate-salt hypertensive rats.

OBJECTIVE: Endothelium-dependent vasodilation is attenuated in humans and experimental hypertension models, and this phenomenon may be largely due to decreased release or activity of nitric oxide (NO). However, very few studies have evaluated whether beta-adrenoceptor antagonists increase endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) expression in the left ventricle. We examined the effects of long-term treatment with celiprolol, a specific beta1-antagonist with a weak beta2-agonist action, on eNOS expression in the left ventricle and evaluated its relationship to myocardial remodeling in the left ventricle of deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA)-salt hypertensive rats. METHODS: DOCA-salt rats (n = 18) were induced with weekly injections of DOCA (30 mg/kg) and 1% saline in their drinking water after right nephrectomy. Celiprolol (DOCA-CEL, n = 9, 10 mg/kg per day, subdepressor dose) or a vehicle (DOCA-V, n = 9) were given after induction of DOCA-salt hypertension for 5 weeks, and age-matched sham-operated rats (ShC, n = 9) served as a control group. RESULTS: Blood pressure levels in DOCA-V and DOCA-CEL were similar and significantly higher than that in ShC. The eNOS mRNA and protein levels, and NOS activity in the left ventricle significantly decreased in DOCA-V compared with ShC, and significantly increased in DOCA-CEL compared with DOCA-V. DOCA-V showed a significant increase in the wall-to-lumen ratio, perivascular fibrosis, myocardial fibrosis, and type I collagen mRNA, with all these parameters being significantly improved by celiprolol. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial remodeling of DOCA-salt hypertensive rats was significantly ameliorated by subdepressor doses of celiprolol, which may be due to increased eNOS expression in the left ventricle.

Comparative effects of atenolol versus celiprolol on serum lipids and blood pressure in hyperlipidemic and hypertensive subjects.

Antihypertensive drugs may affect serum lipoprotein levels in mixed populations but data in hyperlipidemic patients are scanty. Atenolol versus celiprolol effects on serum lipoproteins were compared in 159 hyperlipoproteinemic hypertensive patients. This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, positive-controlled multicenter trial with centralized lipoprotein laboratory and diet constancy monitoring. Blood pressure reduction and serum lipoprotein and apoprotein levels were monitored for 3 months. Both drugs reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Atenolol had greater effects than celiprolol on diastolic pressure, but effects on systolic blood pressure were not different. Patients receiving atenolol had lower serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and higher low-density lipoprotein/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratios, whereas patients treated with celiprolol showed no contrasting changes. These differences in lipoprotein levels between drug treatment groups were statistically significant at weeks 9 and 12. The difference between drug treatments was also significant if the values of the 9- and 12-week visits were averaged. Patients taking atenolol had statistically significantly higher serum levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides and apoprotein B at 9 weeks. These divergent directional changes were consistent throughout and statistically significantly different between drugs.

Effect of atenolol and celiprolol on acetylcholine-induced coronary vasomotion in coronary artery disease.

Earlier studies have reported on the potentiated muscarinic vasoconstriction of intracoronary acetylcholine after metoprolol application in patients with coronary artery disease. The present study investigated the effect of celiprolol, atenolol, and placebo on acetylcholine-induced vasomotion in patients with coronary artery disease. Furthermore, direct effects on coronary vasomotion and on hemodynamics were evaluated. Acetylcholine (intracoronary concentrations of 6.3x10(-7), 2.0x10(-6), and 6.3x10(-6) M) was given before and after double-blind celiprolol (0.30 mg/kg IV), atenolol (0.15 mg/kg IV), or placebo in 3x12 patients. Vasomotion was investigated by quantitative coronary angiography in proximal and distal segments of epicardial coronary arteries, and by the determination of the coronary resistance index based on Doppler-flow measurements. The investigated drugs had no direct affect on the diameter of the epicardial coronary arteries. However, celiprolol, in contrast to atenolol, significantly reduced systemic vascular resistance (change after atenolol: from 1,855+/-308 to 2,161+/-550 dyne s cm(-5); celiprolol: 1,691+/-435 to 1,411+/-343 dyne s cm(-5); and placebo: 1,722+/-215 to 1,710+/-213 dyne s cm(-5), p<0.001) and the coronary resistance index (change after atenolol: 2.52+/-3.58 to 2.86+/-4.24; celiprolol: 2.70+/-1.55 to 2.49+/-2.26; and placebo: 1.97+/-1.35 to 1.92+/-1.25, p<0.01). Celiprolol, atenolol, and placebo did not have different effects on acetylcholine-induced coronary vasomotion of epicardial conductance vessels (diminution of proximal lumen diameter before/after atenolol: 0.42+/-0.39/0.44+/-0.39 mm; celiprolol: 0.32+/-0.26/0.30+/-0.24 mm; and placebo: 0.36+/-0.29/0.43+/-0.40 mm) and of coronary resistance vessels (reduction of coronary resistance index before/after atenolol: 1.95 +/-4.74/ 1.92+/-3.74; celiprolol: 0.98+/-0.73/1.41+/-1.50; and placebo: 1.16+/-1.29/1.16+/-1.04). In contrast to atenolol, celiprolol possesses vasodilative properties in systemic and coronary resistance vessels. There was no direct effect on the diameter of conductance vessels. Acetylcholine-induced coronary vasomotion both in conductance and resistance vessels was not influenced by the beta blockers that were studied. This suggests that atenolol and celiprolol do not influence endothelium-dependent, nitric oxide related vasomotion.

Pharmacological actions of the selective and non-selective beta-adrenoceptor antagonists celiprolol, bisoprolol and propranolol on human bronchi.

1. The pharmacological actions of the beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, celiprolol, bisoprolol and propranolol were investigated in human lung tissue by radioligand binding experiments as well as in human isolated bronchi by functional experiments in organ baths. 2. Data from lung tissue were compared to those obtained from myocardial membranes. 3. Lung tissue was obtained from 10 patients having undergone lung resection for bronchial carcinoma and myocardial tissue from a patient who had received a heart transplantation. 4. In radioligand binding experiments, celiprolol exhibited a high affinity binding to beta 1-adrenoceptors in heart and a low affinity binding to beta 2-adrenoceptors in lung tissue. The selectivity obtained for the beta 1-adrenoceptor was calculated to a factor of eleven. 5. Compared to bisoprolol and propranolol, celiprolol elicited the lowest affinity for the beta-adrenoceptor, as judged from the K1-values. 6. In the absence and presence of the guanine nucleotide Gpp(NH)p celiprolol did not affect receptor binding. 7. In functional experiments on intact bronchi, celiprolol, bisoprolol and propranolol failed to produce relaxation (+/- forskolin) or a significant difference in efficacy in antagonizing the relaxant effects of isoprenaline. However, a rank order of potencies was revealed (propranolol:bisoprolol:celiprolol = 46:12:1). 8. Plasma concentrations for celiprolol and bisoprolol usually achieved in vivo were below the IC50 value obtained in vitro. In contrast, for propranolol, plasma concentrations were nearly identical with the IC50 value. 9. It is concluded that celiprolol is a selective beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonist on human heart and has no agonistic properties on intact human bronchi. Compounds such as celiprolol and bisoprolol may in comparison to propranolol, possess reasonable therapeutic advantages in the treatment of patients with obstructive lung disease due to their low affinity for beta 2-adrenoceptors.

Effect of celiprolol therapy on arterial dilatation in experimental hypertension.

1. It has recently been suggested that therapy with beta-adrenoceptor blockers reduces peripheral arterial resistance via enhanced vascular dilatation. Therefore, we studied the effects of celiprolol, which is a specific beta 1-antagonist that has a weak beta 2-agonist action, on arterial tone in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats. 2. Two doses of celiprolol (5 and 50 mg kg-1 day-1) were administered to the SHR, while the WKY rats received only the higher dose of the drug. During the 12-week treatment period the higher dose attenuated the increase in blood pressure by approximately 20 mmHg in SHR, whereas the lower dose was without significant antihypertensive effect. Celiprolol therapy did not affect blood pressure in the normotensive WKY rats. 3. Responses of mesenteric arterial rings in vitro were examined at the end of the study. Interestingly, endothelium-mediated relaxations of noradrenaline (NA)-precontracted rings to acetylcholine (ACh) in the absence and presence of the cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, diclofenac, were equally enhanced in both celiprolol-treated SHR groups. The nitric oxide synthase inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) practically abolished the relaxations to ACh in all SHR irrespective of whether they had received celiprolol, whereas in WKY rats L-NAME only attenuated the responses to ACh. However, no differences were found between the SHR groups in relaxations to ACh when hyperpolarization of smooth muscle was prevented by precontractions induced by 50 mM KCl. Vasorelaxation of NA-precontracted rings to the exogenous nitric oxide donor, nitroprusside, was also moderately augmented in both celiprolol-treated SHR groups, while the relaxation to beta-adrenoceptor agonist, isoprenaline, remained equally impaired in all SHR whether or not they had received celiprolol. No differences were observed between the two WKY groups in the responses to ACh, nitroprusside or isoprenaline. 4. Contractile sensitivity of mesenteric arterial rings to the receptor-mediated agonists, NA and 5-hydroxytryptamine, was comparable in all study groups. 5. In conclusion, SHR treatment with either the low or the higher dose of celiprolol was accompanied by enhancement of both endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent nitric oxide-mediated arterial relaxation, possibly via a hyperpolarization mechanism. Interestingly, this effect appeared to be independent of the reduction in blood pressure.

Celiprolol augments the effect of physical exercise on insulin sensitivity and serum lipid levels in chronic heart failure.

PURPOSE: Impaired insulin sensitivity has been linked with chronic heart failure (CHF). Exercise has a beneficial effect on insulin sensitivity in healthy subjects. It is used also as an adjunctive therapy in patients with CHF. We studied the effect of randomized treatment with celiprolol, a vasodilating beta(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist, 200 mg once daily (n=20) or placebo (n=11) on serum lipid levels and insulin sensitivity in patients with CHF. In addition, all subjects participated in a 6-month exercise training protocol. Thirteen subjects in the celiprolol and eight subjects in the control group were on additional beta(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist as part of their tailored CHF therapy. Insulin sensitivity was determined using the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp test (diabetic subjects excluded, n=11 for the celiprolol group and n=8 for the placebo group). RESULTS: Insulin sensitivity index (ISI) increased by 33% (P<0.05) in the celiprolol group and by 17% (NS) in the control group. The mean increase in the whole group was 20% [from 68.2+/-11.5 to 81.7+/-10.7 ml/min/kg (mU/l), P<0.05]. No change was found in the total cholesterol level. HDL cholesterol levels increased by 12% (from 0.98+/-0.05 to 1.10+/-0.05 mmol/l, P<0. 005), and HDL/total cholesterol and HDL/LDL cholesterol ratios by 15% and 16%, respectively (P<0.005). The increase in serum fasting HDL cholesterol level was greater in the celiprolol-treated group (P<0.05). At baseline ISI correlated with maximal oxygen uptake (r=0. 65, P<0.0001) and body mass index (r=-0.55, P<0.001). The change in ISI correlated weakly with the improvement in muscle exercise capacity (r=0.53, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Insulin sensitivity and serum lipid levels may be favorably affected by exercise training in subjects with mild-to-moderate CHF. Celiprolol, a vasodilating beta1- selective adrenoceptor antagonist, potentiates this effect.

Effects of vasodilatory antihypertensive agents on endothelial dysfunction in rats with ischemic acute renal failure.

Ischemic acute renal failure is associated with vascular endothelial dysfunction. We examined whether vasodilatory antihypertensive agents would improve endothelial function in rats with ischemia/reperfusion renal injury. Rat kidneys were isolated and perfused after clipping of the bilateral renal arteries for 45 min and reperfusion for 24 h, and renal perfusion pressure and nitric oxide concentration in the venous effluent (chemiluminescence assay) were monitored. Preischemic administration of celiprolol (a beta-blocker; 100 mg/kg p.o.), benidipine (a calcium channel blocker; 1 mg/kg p.o.), or imidapril (an angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibitor; 3 mg/kg p.o.) restored endothelial function in rats subjected to acute renal ischemia (deltarenal perfusion pressure [10(-8) M acetylcholine]: sham -42+/-3%, ischemia -31+/-1%, ischemia +celiprolol -39+/-1%*, ischemia+benidipine -38+/-2%*, ischemia+imidapril -42+/-2%*; *p<0.05 vs. ischemia). Serum urea nitrogen and creatinine levels were also lower in the treated groups. Furthermore, ischemia-induced decreases in the response to acetylcholine and renal excretory function were smaller in SHR than in deoxycorticosterone-salt hypertensive rats, in which endothelial damage was marked. These results suggest that preischemic endothelial function may influence the degree of ischemic renal injury. Calcium channel blockers, converting-enzyme inhibitors, and endothelial NO synthase-activating beta-blockers had beneficial effects on renovascular endothelial dysfunction due to ischemia.