Long-term colchicine for the prevention of vascular recurrent events in non-cardioembolic stroke (CONVINCE): a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Anti-inflammatory therapy with long-term colchicine prevented vascular recurrence in coronary disease. Unlike coronary disease, which is typically caused by atherosclerosis, ischaemic stroke is caused by diverse mechanisms including atherosclerosis and small vessel disease or is frequently due to an unknown cause. We aimed to investigate the hypothesis that long-term colchicine would reduce recurrent events after ischaemic stroke. METHODS: We did a randomised, parallel-group, open-label, blinded endpoint assessed trial comparing long-term colchicine (0·5 mg orally per day) plus guideline-based usual care with usual care only. Hospital-based patients with non-severe, non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke or high-risk transient ischaemic attack were eligible. The primary endpoint was a composite of first fatal or non-fatal recurrent ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, or hospitalisation (defined as an admission to an inpatient unit or a visit to an emergency department that resulted in at least a 24 h stay [or a change in calendar date if the hospital admission or discharge times were not available]) for unstable angina. The p value for significance was 0·048 to adjust for two prespecified interim analyses conducted by the data monitoring committee, for which the steering committee and trial investigators remained blinded. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02898610) and is completed. FINDINGS: 3154 patients were randomly assigned between Dec 19, 2016, and Nov 21, 2022, with the last follow-up on Jan 31, 2024. The trial finished before the anticipated number of outcomes was accrued (367 outcomes planned) due to budget constraints attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic. Ten patients withdrew consent for analysis of their data, leaving 3144 patients in the intention-to-treat analysis: 1569 (colchicine and usual care) and 1575 (usual care alone). A primary endpoint occurred in 338 patients, 153 (9·8%) of 1569 patients allocated to colchicine and usual care and 185 (11·7%) of 1575 patients allocated to usual care alone (incidence rates 3·32 vs 3·92 per 100 person-years, hazard ratio 0·84; 95% CI 0·68-1·05, p=0·12). Although no between-group difference in C-reactive protein (CRP) was observed at baseline, patients treated with colchicine had lower CRP at 28 days and at 1, 2, and 3 years (p<0·05 for all timepoints). The rates of serious adverse events were similar in both groups. INTERPRETATION: Although no statistically significant benefit was observed on the primary intention-to-treat analysis, the findings provide new evidence supporting the rationale for anti-inflammatory therapy in further randomised trials. FUNDING: Health Research Board Ireland, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation), and Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen (Research Foundation Flanders), Belgium.

In patients with type 2 diabetes and recent MI, colchicine reduced a composite CV outcome at 23 mo.

SOURCE CITATION: Roubille F, Bouabdallaoui N, Kouz S, et al. Low-dose colchicine in patients with type 2 diabetes and recent myocardial infarction in the COLchicine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial (COLCOT). Diabetes Care. 2024;47:467-470. 38181203.

Low-dose colchicine for atherosclerosis: long-term safety.

Low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg daily) is now FDA-approved for secondary prevention in patients with coronary disease and will be increasingly prescribed in clinical practice. In this State-of-the-Art Review, data were collated from contemporary systemic reviews of case reports, drug registries, and placebo-controlled trials that assessed specific issues of safety related to the continuous use of colchicine in a range of clinical settings to inform physicians, pharmacists, and patients of the absolute risks of continuous use of low-dose colchicine, including among individuals taking statin therapy. Based upon these collective data, it is concluded that aside mild diarrhoea on initiation of colchicine that typically subsides in the vast majority of patients within a week of therapy, continuous use of low-dose colchicine is well tolerated and very safe. It does not affect renal, liver, or cognitive function, has no adverse effects on bleeding, wound healing, fertility, or pregnancy, and does not increase risks of cancer, serious infection, or cause-specific mortality. When appropriately prescribed to patients without significant renal or hepatic impairment, reports of myelosuppression, myotoxicity, and serious drug-drug interactions are rare and no more frequent than placebo, including in patients taking statin therapy. Physicians, pharmacists, and patients can be reassured that in the absence of significant renal or hepatic impairment continuous use of low-dose colchicine can be used safely in patients with atherosclerosis for the purpose of reducing cardiovascular risk.

Effect of colchicine on progression of known coronary atherosclerosis in patients with STable CoROnary artery disease CoMpared to placebo (EKSTROM) trial-rationale and design.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the major cause of mortality in the United States. Despite lifestyle modification and traditional risk factor control residual inflammatory risk remains an untreated concern. Colchicine is an oral, medication that has been used for gout, mediterranean fever and pericarditis for decades. In recent trials, colchicine has been shown to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events, however the mechanism of benefit remains unclear. The objective of the randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled EKSTROM trial is to evaluate the effects of colchicine 0.5mg/day on atherosclerotic plaque. METHODS: Eighty-four participants will be enrolled after obtaining informed consent and followed for 12 months. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to colchicine 0.5mg/day or placebo in a 1:1 fashion as add-on to their standard of care. All participants will undergo coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) at baseline and at 12 months. RESULTS: As of November 2023, the study is 100% enrolled with an expected end of study by the second quarter of 2024. The primary endpoint is change in low attenuation plaque volume as measured by CCTA. Secondary endpoints include change in volume of different plaque types (including total atheroma volume, noncalcified plaque volume, dense calcified plaque volume, remodeling index), change in inflammatory markers (IL-6, IL-1ß, IL-18, hs-CRP), change in pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation, change in epicardial adipose tissue volume and attenuation and change in brachial flow mediated dilation. CONCLUSION: EKSTROM is the first randomized study to assess the effects of colchicine on plaque progression, pericoronary and epicardial fat. EKSTROM will provide important information on the mechanistic effects of colchicine on the cardiovascular system. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: clinicaltrials.gov, Registration Number: NCT06342609 url: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/study/NCT06342609?term=EKSTROM&rank=1.

Design and rationale of the CLEAR SYNERGY (OASIS 9) trial: A 2x2 factorial randomized controlled trial of colchicine versus placebo and spironolactone vs placebo in patients with myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Patients experiencing myocardial infarction (MI) remain at high risk of future major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). While low-dose colchicine and spironolactone have been shown to decrease post-MI MACE, more data are required to confirm their safety and efficacy in an unselected post-MI population. Therefore, we initiated the CLEAR SYNERGY (OASIS 9) trial to address these uncertainties. METHODS: The CLEAR SYNERGY trial is a 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial of low-dose colchicine 0.5 mg daily versus placebo and spironolactone 25 mg daily versus placebo in 7,062 post-MI participants who were within 72 hours of the index percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We blinded participants, healthcare providers, research personnel, and outcome adjudicators to treatment allocation. The primary outcome for colchicine is the first occurrence of the composite of cardiovascular death, recurrent MI, stroke, or unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization. The coprimary outcomes for spironolactone are (1) the composite of the total numbers of cardiovascular death or new or worsening heart failure and (2) the first occurrence of the composite of cardiovascular death, new or worsening heart failure, recurrent MI or stroke. We finished recruitment with 7,062 participants from 104 centers in 14 countries on November 8, 2022, and plan to present the results in the fall of 2024. CONCLUSIONS: CLEAR SYNERGY is a large international randomized controlled trial that will inform the effects of low-dose colchicine and spironolactone in largely unselected post-MI patients who undergo PCI. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03048825).

Development of thermosensitive liposome-containing in-situ gel systems for intranasal administration of thiocolchicoside and in vivo evaluation in a rabbit model.

AIM: Thiocolchicoside (THC) is a drug under the category of BCS III. Due to its high molecular weight, it has poor oral bioavailability and low skin permeability. This study aims to find an alternative delivery method for THC that enhances its bioavailability through nasal application approach. In situ gels containing plain or liposomal THC with different combinations of Pluronic® F127 and PEG 400 were prepared. METHOD: Liposome formulations were prepared using the thin film hydration method and tested for their characterization such as for drug content, particle size, and zeta potential. In vivo pharmacokinetic parameters of formulations such as Cmax, Tmax, and AUC were tested on the rabbit model. The formulations were also scrutinized for their cell viability properties. RESULT: Formulation composition with 2% soybean phosphatidylcholine and 10 mg THC exhibited ∼94% entrapment efficiency, minimum particle size 101.32 nm, low polydispersity index 0.225 and +0.355 zeta potential. In situ liposomal dispersion containing 15% Pluronic® F127 turned into gel at nasal temperature. Cell lines were unharmed for 48 h. In situ liposomal gels showed 1.5x higher blood concentration than the control formula. CONCLUSION: In situ gels of liposomal THC formulations offer advantages over traditional nasal solutions, demonstrating comparable bioavailability to parenteral medication while also preserving the health of nasal mucosa cells.

Factors Associated With Successful Withdrawal of Biologic Agents in Children With Colchicine-Resistant Familial Mediterranean Fever.

BACKGROUND: Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is a monogenic autoinflammatory disease, and colchicine is the mainstay of treatment. Approximately 5%-10% of patients may respond inadequately to colchicine, and anti-interleukin-1 (anti-IL-1) agents are important treatment options in these patients. The aim of this study was to see whether there is any factor associated with the withdrawal of these anti-IL-1 agents and to investigate the characteristics of colchicine-resistant FMF patients who needed biological therapy. METHODS: Demographic, clinical characteristics, and disease severity of patients, at 2 referral centers, between 2012 and 2022, in whom anti-IL-1 treatment was continued and discontinued, were compared in this study. The international severity scoring system for FMF (ISSF) was used for disease severity assessment. RESULTS: In 64 colchicine-resistant FMF patients, the median (interquartile range) duration of biological treatment was 39 (45) months. Treatment of 26 patients (40.6%) was started with anakinra and 38 (59.4%) with canakinumab. During follow-up, anti-IL-1 treatment was discontinued in 23 patients (35.9%). High ISSF scores before biological treatment, presence of exertional leg pain, subclinical inflammation, and comorbidities were found to be statistically more frequent in the group whose biological therapy could not be discontinued ( p = 0.009, p = 0.006, p = 0.026, p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Low ISSF scores before biological treatment with no accompanying exertional leg pain, subclinical inflammation, and comorbidities may be stated as an associated factors in terms of the discontinuation of biological agents in colchicine-resistant pediatric FMF patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Colchicine after Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Experimental and clinical evidence supports the role of inflammation in atherosclerosis and its complications. Colchicine is an orally administered, potent antiinflammatory medication that is indicated for the treatment of gout and pericarditis. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind trial involving patients recruited within 30 days after a myocardial infarction. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg once daily) or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, resuscitated cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, stroke, or urgent hospitalization for angina leading to coronary revascularization. The components of the primary end point and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 4745 patients were enrolled; 2366 patients were assigned to the colchicine group, and 2379 to the placebo group. Patients were followed for a median of 22.6 months. The primary end point occurred in 5.5% of the patients in the colchicine group, as compared with 7.1% of those in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 0.96; P = 0.02). The hazard ratios were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.46 to 1.52) for death from cardiovascular causes, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.25 to 2.73) for resuscitated cardiac arrest, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.68 to 1.21) for myocardial infarction, 0.26 (95% CI, 0.10 to 0.70) for stroke, and 0.50 (95% CI, 0.31 to 0.81) for urgent hospitalization for angina leading to coronary revascularization. Diarrhea was reported in 9.7% of the patients in the colchicine group and in 8.9% of those in the placebo group (P = 0.35). Pneumonia was reported as a serious adverse event in 0.9% of the patients in the colchicine group and in 0.4% of those in the placebo group (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with a recent myocardial infarction, colchicine at a dose of 0.5 mg daily led to a significantly lower risk of ischemic cardiovascular events than placebo. (Funded by the Government of Quebec and others; COLCOT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02551094.).

Canakinumab is effective in patients with familial Mediterranean fever resistant and intolerant to the colchicine and/or anakinra treatment.

As an autosomal recessive autoinflammatory disease, treatment of Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) has still gaps. Clinical studies are proving the safety and efficacy of colchicine in patients with FMF. However, there are very limited data on colchicine-resistant patients treated with canakinumab. This study presents the real-life experience of two rheumatology clinics choosing canakinumab in adult patients with FMF resistant to standard therapy. Treatment-resistant FMF patients with validated diagnoses enrolled from two rheumatology clinics. A special database was generated for the study and patients' demographic characteristics, FMF attack characteristics, adverse events seen during treatment, family history, MediterraneanFeVer (MEFV) mutations, and laboratory results recorded. Patients with missing dates were excluded from the analysis. PRAS score is used to assess the disease activity. A total of thirty colchicine and/or anakinra-resistant patients were enrolled to study. Twenty-one patients were female (70%) and the average disease duration was 21 years. The time from colchicine to anakinra was 4.27 years and the time to canakinumab was 1.52 years. Abdominal pain (100%), fever (93.3%), chest pain (56.7%) were the most prevailed findings. Morning stiffness, myalgia, low back pain, chest pain was the predominant musculoskeletal findings. Median colchicine dose was 2 mg/day (min-max 0.5-3 mg/day). The most common side effect during anakinra treatment, apart from treatment unresponsiveness, was injection site reactions. Before canakinumab treatment, the mean number of attacks was 8.3 in the 24 weeks, 4.33 in the third month of canakinumab treatment, and 1.56 at the last visit (p < 0.001). Also, the mean duration of attacks was 67.20 h before canakinumab treatment, this period decreased to 18.27 h after six months of canakinumab treatment (p < 0.001). Canakinumab is effective and tolerable to reduce attacks in resistant patients with FMF. Laboratory findings and clinical observation reveals that canakinumab can be another treatment option for colchicine and/or anakinra non-responders. Further studies with larger patients are required to validate recent findings with canakinumab.

Anti-inflammatory mechanisms and research progress of colchicine in atherosclerotic therapy.

Inflammatory responses play a vital role in the onset and development of atherosclerosis, and throughout the entire process of the chronic disease. The inflammatory responses in atherosclerosis are mainly mediated by the NLRP3 inflammasome and its downstream inflammatory factors. As a powerful anti-inflammatory medicine, colchicine has a history of more than 200 years in clinical application and is the first-choice treatment for immune diseases such as gout and familial Mediterranean fever. In atherosclerosis, colchicine can inhibit the assembly and activation of NLRP3 inflammasome via various mechanisms to effectively reduce the expression of inflammatory factors, thereby reducing the inflammation. Recent clinical trials show that a low dose of colchicine (0.5 mg per day) has a certain protective effect in stable angina patients or those with acute myocardial infarction after PCI. This article summarizes and discusses the mechanisms of colchicine in the treatment of atherosclerosis and the latest research progress.

Colchicine in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The Australian COPS Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation plays a crucial role in clinical manifestations and complications of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Colchicine, a commonly used treatment for gout, has recently emerged as a novel therapeutic option in cardiovascular medicine owing to its anti-inflammatory properties. We sought to determine the potential usefulness of colchicine treatment in patients with ACS. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 17 hospitals in Australia that provide acute cardiac care service. Eligible participants were adults (18-85 years) who presented with ACS and had evidence of coronary artery disease on coronary angiography managed with either percutaneous coronary intervention or medical therapy. Patients were assigned to receive either colchicine (0.5 mg twice daily for the first month, then 0.5 mg daily for 11 months) or placebo, in addition to standard secondary prevention pharmacotherapy, and were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, ACS, ischemia-driven (unplanned) urgent revascularization, and noncardioembolic ischemic stroke in a time to event analysis. RESULTS: A total of 795 patients were recruited between December 2015 and September 2018 (mean age, 59.8±10.3 years; 21% female), with 396 assigned to the colchicine group and 399 to the placebo group. Over the 12-month follow-up, there were 24 events in the colchicine group compared with 38 events in the placebo group (P=0.09, log-rank). There was a higher rate of total death (8 versus 1; P=0.017, log-rank) and, in particular, noncardiovascular death in the colchicine group (5 versus 0; P=0.024, log-rank). The rates of reported adverse effects were not different (colchicine 23.0% versus placebo 24.3%), and they were predominantly gastrointestinal symptoms (colchicine, 23.0% versus placebo, 20.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of colchicine to standard medical therapy did not significantly affect cardiovascular outcomes at 12 months in patients with ACS and was associated with a higher rate of mortality. Registration: URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au; Unique identifier: ACTRN12615000861550.

Inflammation and Stroke Risk: A New Target for Prevention.

New therapeutic approaches are required for secondary prevention of residual vascular risk after stroke. Diverse sources of evidence support a causal role for inflammation in the pathogenesis of stroke. Randomized controlled trials of anti-inflammatory agents have reported benefit for secondary prevention in patients with coronary disease. We review the data from observational studies supporting a role for inflammation in pathogenesis of stroke, overview randomized controlled trials of anti-inflammatory therapy in cardiac disease and discuss the potential implications for stroke prevention therapy.

Comparative efficacy of low-dose versus regular-dose colchicine to prevent flares in gout patients initiated on urate-lowering therapies.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the prophylactic effect of regular-dose (RD, 1.2 mg/day) vs low-dose (LD, 0.6 mg/day) colchicine on gout flare when initiating urate-lowering therapy. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we included gout patients who were initiated on either allopurinol or febuxostat, in combination with colchicine therapy and followed them up for 3 months. We analysed the rates of gout flare and adverse events according to the dose of colchicine. We performed the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and weighted logistic regression analysis to assess the treatment effect. Analysis of gout flares and adverse events was performed on an intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) basis. RESULTS: Of the total of 419 patients with gout, 177 patients (42.2%) received LD colchicine, whereas 242 patients (57.8%) received RD colchicine. Lower BMI and estimated glomerular filtration rate, and higher incidence of cardiovascular disease were seen in the LD group than in the RD group. In IPTW-adjusted analysis, events of gout flare were not significantly different between the LD and RD groups [ITT: 14.3% vs 11.3%; odds ratio (OR): 1.309, 95% CI: 0.668, 2.566, P = 0.432; PP: 15.3% vs 10.0%; OR: 1.623, 95% CI: 0.765, 3.443, P = 0.207]. However, LD colchicine was associated with a lower rate of adverse events than RD colchicine [ITT: 8.2% vs 17.9%; OR: 0.410, 95% CI: 0.217, 0.777; P < 0.05; PP: 8.4% vs 17.2%; OR: 0.442, 95% CI: 0.223, 0.878; P < 0.05]. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that LD colchicine can adequately prevent gout flare with fewer adverse events compared with RD colchicine.

Effect of low-dose colchicine in acute and chronic coronary syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sparse evidence of the prognostic benefit of the anti-inflammatory drug colchicine in chronic and acute coronary syndromes (CCS/ACS) exists. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of studies on CCS or ACS comparing colchicine vs. placebo and reporting data on cardiovascular outcomes (primary end points of each study) and/or changes in hs-CRP. RESULTS: Ten studies were selected: three on CCS (LoDoCo, LoDoCo2 and the CCS subgroup of COLCHICINE-PCI; total patient number = 6256), three on ACS (COLCOT, COPS, ACS subgroup of COLCHICINE-PCI; n = 5,654) and five (n = 532) on hs-CRP changes from 1 week to 12 months, in CCS and/or ACS. In patients with CCS, colchicine reduced by 49% risk of a composite end point (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32 to 0.81, P = .005). The favourable effect of colchicine on the risk of cardiovascular events did not change when excluding COLCHICINE-PCI from analysis (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.03, P = .061). In patients with ACS, the use of colchicine tended to decrease the occurrence of the combined end point compared with placebo (HR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.05, P = .100), and colchicine became significantly protective when removing COLCHICINE-PCI from analysis (HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.92, P = .009). Furthermore, colchicine tended to reduce the hs-CRP increase (standardized mean difference=-0.31, 95% CI -0.72 to 0.1, P = .133) compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Colchicine therapy near halves the risk of cardiovascular events in CCS compared with placebo and is associated with a nonsignificant 23% risk reduction in ACS, together with a trend towards a greater reduction of hs-CRP.

Successful Treatment of Covid-19 Associated Cytokine Release Syndrome with Colchicine. A Case Report and Review of Literature.

We describe the case of a 42 year old, healthy patient with Covid-19 who despite improvement in his respiratory symptoms developed a mild to moderate cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and an associated monoarticular gout flare. Since the patient refused admission to the hospital and had stable vital signs, we chose to treat him with a safe anti-inflammatory and non-immunosuppressive therapy. To hit two birds with one stone, we considered colchicine, as it has systemic anti-inflammatory effects and is also effective in gout flare. Unexpectedly, 48 hours after treatment, not only did his ongoing fever and toe pain disappear, he also had significant improvements in his general state of health and all his inflammatory markers including fibrinogen, ferritin, D-dimer, and IL-6 levels normalized. To our knowledge, the use of colchicine in Covid-19 and CRS has not been reported. This observation merits the consideration of colchicine as a safe, inexpensive and oral medication for the treatment of mild to moderate CRS in Covid-19 patients. More importantly, in Covid-19 patients with early lung involvement colchicine may be an appropriate candidate to prevent CRS in adjunction with routine antiviral agents. Indeed, multicenter, randomized controlled studies are required to evaluate the benefits of this therapy.

Colchicine in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of colchicine after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). DATA SOURCES: English-language searches were made of MEDLINE and EMBASE from database inception through mid-June 2020. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Randomized trials characterizing the effects of colchicine in ACS were considered. Of 627 title and abstracts identified, nine trials were included. Two reviewers extracted data and rated study quality. DATA SYNTHESIS: Four studies showed colchicine did not attenuate C-reactive protein production. Colchicine did modulate the NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 inflammasome in 3 studies and reduced production of chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), CCL5, and C-X3-C motif chemokine ligand 1 in 1 study. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were not significantly different at 30 days in 3 studies, administered as 1.8 mg preprocedurally or scheduled 1 mg daily. One study found a significant reduction in MACE with colchicine 0.5 mg daily over median 22.6 months (hazard ratio = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.61-0.96). Colchicine is associated with increased gastrointestinal adverse events but was generally well tolerated. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Colchicine is likely to reduce MACE in an ACS population if administered for greater than 30 days but does not improve MACE when administered only preprocedurally. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive colchicine 0.5 mg daily for greater than 30 days is reasonable for an ACS population on guideline-directed medical therapy treated with PCI. Additional studies are needed to validate and determine the durability of these benefits.

Do all colchicine preparations have the same effectiveness in patients with familial Mediterranean fever?

AIM: Colchicine is the primary treatment for familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). Several colchicine preparations are currently using available globally. This study aimed to describe the demographic, clinical, and genetic features of FMF patients treated with multiple colchicine preparations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of patients diagnosed as FMF and followed-up by our pediatric rheumatology department were retrospectively evaluated. Patients that were treated with multiple colchicine preparations were included. Patient demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were obtained from the patient files and the hospital patient database. The daily colchicine dose and FMF attack frequency before and after switching from domestically produced (DP)-coated colchicine tablets to foreign produced (FP)-compressed colchicine tablets were compared. RESULTS: The study included 35 pediatric FMF patients (22 males and 13 females) with a mean age of 12.85 ± 4.62 years. Mean age at disease onset was 3.66 ± 2.11 years, versus 5.57 ± 4.28 years at diagnosis. The mean attack frequency before and after treatment with FP-compressed colchicine tablets was 9.50 ± 4.46 and 1.85 ± 1.41/year, respectively (p < .001). The mean attack duration significantly decreased in all the patients treated with FP-compressed colchicine tablets (p < .001). The difference in acute phase reactants during the attack-free periods before and after FP-compressed colchicine tablet treatment was significant (p < .001). CONCLUSION: The present findings show that pediatric FMF patients with ongoing attacks and elevated acute phase reactants during attack-free periods while treated with DP-coated colchicine tablets might benefit from switching to FP-compressed colchicine tablets before initiating biologic treatment. Long-term controlled studies are warranted, so as to obtain better evidence of the benefits of multiple colchicine preparations in pediatric FMF patients.

Open-label randomised pragmatic trial (CONTACT) comparing naproxen and low-dose colchicine for the treatment of gout flares in primary care.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness and safety of naproxen and low-dose colchicine for treating gout flares in primary care. METHODS: This was a multicentre open-label randomised trial. Adults with a gout flare recruited from 100 general practices were randomised equally to naproxen 750 mg immediately then 250 mg every 8 hours for 7 days or low-dose colchicine 500 mcg three times per day for 4 days. The primary outcome was change in worst pain intensity in the last 24 hours (0-10 Numeric Rating Scale) from baseline measured daily over the first 7 days: mean change from baseline was compared between groups over days 1-7 by intention to treat. RESULTS: Between 29 January 2014 and 31 December 2015, we recruited 399 participants (naproxen n=200, colchicine n=199), of whom 349 (87.5%) completed primary outcome data at day 7. There was no significant between-group difference in average pain-change scores over days 1-7 (colchicine vs naproxen: mean difference -0.18; 95% CI -0.53 to 0.17; p=0.32). During days 1-7, diarrhoea (45.9% vs 20.0%; OR 3.31; 2.01 to 5.44) and headache (20.5% vs 10.7%; 1.92; 1.03 to 3.55) were more common in the colchicine group than the naproxen group but constipation was less common (4.8% vs 19.3%; 0.24; 0.11 to 0.54). CONCLUSION: We found no difference in pain intensity over 7 days between people with a gout flare randomised to either naproxen or low-dose colchicine. Naproxen caused fewer side effects supporting naproxen as first-line treatment for gout flares in primary care in the absence of contraindications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN (69836939), clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01994226), EudraCT (2013-001354-95).

Colchicine and Leukopenia: Clinical Implications.

Colchicine is the mainstay of treatment for familial Mediterranean fever. We investigated the frequency of leukopenia in 213 patients with familial Mediterranean fever treated with standard doses of colchicine (0.5-2.0 mg/day). We found that 23 patients (10.8%) had reversible leukopenia, 3 moderate, and none severe and that their rate of infections was not increased.

A novel cholchicine/gadolinium-loading tubulin self-assembly nanocarrier for MR imaging and chemotherapy of glioma.

To enhance the therapeutic efficiency and reduce side effects from drug delivery and chemotherapy, image-guided nanoscale systems have attracted tremendous attention in recent decades. In this study, we developed a novel method to fabricate a colchicine/gadolinium-loaded tubulin self-assembly nanocarrier (Col-Gd@Tub NC) for the image-guided chemotherapy of glioma. The Col-Gd@Tub NCs were spontaneously formed via tubulin self-assembly and were subsequently functionalized by colchicine and gadolinium elements. These resultant Col-Gd@Tub NCs with a diameter of 45 nm exhibited uniform particle size distribution and favorable stability without any leakage of gadolinium in water. Meanwhile, the introduction of gadolinium endowed Col-Gd@Tub NCs with high T 1-weighted MRI performance in vitro. After tail vein injection, Col-Gd@Tub NCs exhibited excellent MRI contrast capability and relatively long circulation time (∼12 h) and were finally cleared out from the bladder. More significantly, the binding colchicine still exerted an anti-tumor effect after the Col-Gd@Tub NCs were taken up by the tumor cells. These results show that the Col-Gd@Tub NCs may be served as a versatile nanoscale platform for the integration of biomedical imaging probes and therapeutic molecules for tumor therapy.