Onabotulinumtoxina (craniotomy scar combined with cranial suture line injections) for persistent post craniotomy headache: Case series with long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: There is no defined preventive treatment protocol for persistent post-craniotomy headache. In several small case series and individual case reports onabotulinumtoxinA injected into the craniotomy scar has shown possible efficacy. What is lacking is long term follow-up and if focusing on the cranial suture lines along with the craniotomy scar can enhance improvement and provide more sustained benefit. METHODS: Retrospective chart review with case series. RESULTS: Four patients (three women, one man) with ICHD-3 defined persistent post craniotomy headache were treated using a novel onabotulinumtoxinA injection protocol. All the patients presented with continuous head pain of moderate to severe intensity. All had severe allodynia on the side of their craniotomy. All had significant reduction in quality of life. Our application of onabotulinumtoxinA involved injection into both the surgical scar and the transected/irritated cranial suture lines noted on neuroimaging and physical examination. With treatment all patients demonstrated significant benefit including a reduction in daily pain intensity (75%-100%), developing periods of pain freedom (2-7 days per week) and having a dramatic improvement in quality of life (close to 100% in all). The benefit was sustained for at least five years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: From our case series it appears that injection not only along the painful craniotomy scar but into the involved cranial suture lines provides positive efficacy and sustained improvement in patients with persistent post craniotomy headache.

Atypical sagittal suture craniosynostosis: pathological considerations for early closure of the anterior part of the sagittal suture.

Sagittal suture synostosis is one of the most common craniosynostoses and is often diagnosed by characteristic narrow and long skull shape, scaphocephaly. However, some patients with sagittal suture synostosis do not present with typical scaphocephaly, making early diagnosis difficult. In this study, five cases of characteristic skull deformity showing a narrowing of the cranium posterior to the coronal suture on computed tomography (CT) are presented. The three older children presented with papilledema and intellectual disability and a closed sagittal suture on CT. The two infant cases were diagnosed with the characteristic cranial deformities with aggravation of the deformity over time, but sagittal suture closure was not evident on CT. All patients underwent cranial remodeling surgery. In the two infant cases, the histopathological findings showed that the anterior part of the sagittal suture was firmly fused with fibrous tissue without bony fusion. These findings suggested that narrowing of the cranium posterior to the coronal suture might be due to functional fusion of the anterior portion of the sagittal suture prior to bony fusion. In an infant presenting with such a deformity that shows aggravation of the deformity over time, surgical treatment should be considered.

Surgical Treatment of Trigonocephaly, Simplified Technique for Moderate Cases.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of trigonocephaly has increased worldwide over the past 2 decades. Early identification and appropriate treatment are critical. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes and the effect of metopic suture excision, perisutural frontal bone shave, and bilateral pericranial flap method on the shape of the forehead after surgical correction in infants with moderate trigonocephaly. METHODS: The present study was performed as a cross-sectional study on 40 infants of 3 to 12 months old with trigonocephalus who underwent metopic suture excision and pericardial flap surgery in Mofid Pediatric Hospital from 2016 to 2022. The definitive diagnosis of patients' trigonocephaly was made based on clinical signs and computed tomography scan findings by a plastic surgeon. RESULTS: Overall in 40 patients operated by this technique, 23 (57.5%) of cases were males, and 17 (42.5%) were females. The mean age of patients was 7.86 ± 2.22 months. Hospital stay was 2 to 4 days (mean: 3 d), intensive care unit admission was in 33 cases for 24 hours, and no intensive care unit admission for 7 cases. Blood was transfused during surgery for 25 patients, and 15 patients did not require blood transfusion use. Results were evaluated in 6 to 12 months after surgery by 3 independent plastic surgeons, with pre and postoperative photos. Satisfaction with the results of forehead shape was excellent for 60% of patients, good for 37.5%, and moderate for 2.5%. Only one female patient had a recurrence after the surgery. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the pericranial flap method after full metopic suture excision and frontal shave was very effective in the treatment of infants with moderate trigonocephaly.

The Accuracy of Classification Systems in Nonsyndromic Sagittal Craniosynostosis.

Numerous classification systems of nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis (NSC) are applied but none has gained a wide acceptance, since each classification is focused on distinct aspects. The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy of 4 classifications of NSC discussed in the literature by defining the associations among the classifications, individual features (sex, age, cranial index), and objective morphologic criteria (frontal bossing, retrocoronal constriction, sagittal ridge, and occipital bulleting). The study was conducted on anonymized thin-cut CT scans of 133 children with NSC 1 to 12 months old (mean age 5.42 mo). The type of cranial dysmorphology was assessed using 4 classification systems, focusing on skull shape, pattern of sagittal suture closure (Heuzé classification), deformation of skull vault (Sakamoto classification), and a single-dominant feature (David classification). Each patient was also independently investigated for the presence of morphologic criteria. A multivariate analysis was performed to explore the relations among the classifications and assess their accuracy. In the analyzed cohort sphenocephaly (38.3%), CFF type by Heuzé (30.8%), type I by Sakamoto (72.9%), and a central type by David (42.9%) were dominant findings. Regarding the morphologic criteria, frontal bossing was observed the most frequently (91.7%). The age of patients and cranial index differed significantly among the shapes of skull and David classifications ( P <0.001). The shape-based system showed the strongest correlation with other classifications and with measurable variables. Other classifications have much in common and some overlap, but none of them constitutes a standalone system to define all aspects of cranial dysmorphology in NSC.

Long-term neurocognitive outcomes in 204 single-suture craniosynostosis patients.

PURPOSE: Craniosynostosis, which describes premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures, has been associated with a variety of neurocognitive deficits. We sought to explore the cognitive profiles of the various types of single-suture, non-syndromic craniosynostosis (NSC). METHODS: A retrospective review of children 6-18 years old with surgically corrected NSC who underwent neurocognitive testing (Weschler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visuomotor Integration) from the years 2014-2022 was conducted. RESULTS: 204 patients completed neurocognitive testing (139 sagittal, 39 metopic, 22 unicoronal, 4 lambdoid suture). 110 (54%) of the cohort was male, and 150 (74%) were White. Mean IQ was 106.10±14.01 and mean age at surgery and testing were 9.0±12.2 months and 10.9±4.0 years, respectively. Sagittal synostosis was associated with higher scores than metopic synostosis, with significant differences in verbal IQ (109.42±15.76 vs 101.37±10.41), full-scale IQ (108.32±14.44 vs 100.05±11.76), visuomotor integration (101.62±13.64 vs 92.44±12.07), visual perception (103.81±12.42 vs 95.87±11.23), and motor coordination (90.45±15.60 vs 84.21±15.44). Sagittal synostosis was associated with significantly higher scores for visuomotor integration (101.62±13.64 vs 94.95±10.24) and visual perception (103.81±12.42 vs 94.82±12.75) than unicoronal synostosis. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to patients with sagittal synostosis, patients with metopic synostosis exhibited lower scores in verbal IQ, full-scale IQ, visuomotor integration, visual perception, and motor control after surgical correction. Despite surgical correction for premature metopic suture fusion, the effect on the adjacent frontal lobe and white matter connections to other regions of the brain may have a lasting functional impact. Patients with unicoronal synostosis exhibited lower visuomotor integration and visual perception scores.

Facial skeleton dysmorphology in syndromic craniosynostosis: differences between FGFR2 and no-FGFR2-related syndromes and relationship with skull base and facial sutural patterns.

PURPOSE: To assess the role of FGFR2 mutations and sutural synostotic patterns on facial skeleton dysmorphology in children with syndromic craniosynostosis. METHODS: Preoperative high-resolution CT images in 39 infants with syndromic craniosynostosis were evaluated. Patients were divided into infants with and without FGFR2 mutations; each group was split according to synostotic involvement of minor sutures/synchondroses: isolated or combined involvement of middle (MCF) and posterior cranial fossae (PCF). Quantitative analysis of the midface and mandible measures was performed. Each subgroup was compared with a group of age-matched healthy subjects. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with FGFR2 related syndromes were clustered in 3 subgroups: MCF + PCF (8 patients, 5.4 ± 1.75 months), MCF (8 patients, 3.62 ± 1.68 months), and PCF (8 patients, 2.75 ± 0.46 months). Fifteen no-FGFR2 patients were clustered in 2 subgroups: MCF + PCF (7 patients, 9.42 ± 0.78 months) and PCF (8 patients, 7.37 ± 2.92 months). Both FGFR2 and no-FGFR2 groups with involvement of minor sutures coursing in MCF showed more facial sutural synostoses. Children with minor suture/synchondrosis synostosis of MCF (MCF-PCF and MCF subgroups) showed altered position of glenoid fossa and mandibular inclination ([Formula: see text]), but children in the FGFR2 group had also reduced midfacial depth and maxillary length ([Formula: see text]). Children with minor suture/synchondrosis synostosis of PCF (PCF subgroups) had reduced posterior mandibular height, but those children in the FGFR2 group also showed reduced intergonion distance ([Formula: see text]). CONCLUSIONS: In children with syndromic craniosynostosis, both skull base and facial suture synostosis affect facial dysmorphology/hypoplasia. FGFR2 mutations may worsen facial hypoplasia both acting on bone development and causing an earlier premature closure of facial sutures.

Technical evolution of pediatric neurosurgery: craniosynostosis from 1972 to 2023 and beyond.

Very few clinical entities have undergone so many different treatment approaches over such a short period of time as craniosynostosis. Surgical treatments for this condition have ranged from simple linear craniectomies, accounting for the specific role of cranial sutures in assuring the normal growth of the skull, to more complex cranial vault reconstructions, based on the perceived role of the skull base in affecting the growth of the skull. While a great deal of evolution has occurred, there remains controversy regarding the ideal treatment including the best surgical technique, the optimal age for surgery, and the long-term morphological and neurodevelopmental outcomes. The evolution of the surgical management of craniosynostosis in the last 50 years has been affected by several factors. This includes the awareness of needing to operate on affected children during infancy to achieve the best results, the use of multistage operations, the availability of more sophisticated surgical tools, and improved perioperative care. In some forms of craniosynostosis, the operations can be carried out at a very young age with low morbidity, and with the postoperative use of a molding helmet, springs, or distractors, these operations prove to be as effective as traditional larger cranial reconstructions performed in older children. As a consequence, complex surgical operations have become progressively less utilized. A second relevant advance was the more recent advent of a molecular diagnosis, which allowed us to understand the pathogenesis of some associated malformations and neurodevelopmental issues that were observed in some children despite appropriate surgical treatment. Future research should focus on improving the analysis of longer-term outcomes and understanding the natural history of craniofacial conditions, including what issues persist despite optimal surgical correction. Progress in molecular investigations concerning the normal and pathological development of cranial sutures could be a further significant step in the management of craniosynostosis, possibly favoring a "medical" treatment in the near future. Artificial intelligence will likely have a role in establishing the diagnosis with less reliance on radiographic studies and in assisting with surgical planning. Overall, much progress has been made, but there remains much to do.

Outcomes of the early endoscopic-assisted suturectomy for treatment of multisuture craniosynostosis.

To present the outcomes and adverse events associated with the endoscopic-assisted, minimally invasive suturectomy in patients with multisuture synostosis. This retrospective cohort study included children < 65 days of age who underwent endoscopic-assisted suturectomy (EAS) for multisuture craniosynostosis at a single tertiary referral center from 2013 to 2021. The primary outcome was calvarial expansion, and the secondary outcome was adverse events. The pre- and post-operative 3-dimensional brain computed tomography (CT) scan was used to calculate the intracranial volume and cephalic index. During a period of 2 years, 10 infants (10-64 days) diagnosed with multisuture synostosis underwent single-stage EAS of every affected suture in our center. The coronal suture was the most prevalent involved suture among our cases. The mean age and weight of the patients were 39 ± 17.5 days and 4.39 ± 0.8 kg, respectively. The surgical procedure took 42 ± 17.4 min of time and caused 46 ± 25.4 mL of bleeding on average. Ninety percent of the operations were considered successful (n = 9) regarding calvarial expansion. There were two complications, one requiring an open vault surgery and one repairing a leptomeningeal cyst. In the eight patients who did not necessitate further interventions, the mean pre-operative intracranial volume was 643.3 ± 189.4 cm3. The follow-up results within the average of 38.9 months after surgery showed that as age increases, the intracranial volume also increased significantly (R: 0.6, P < 0.0001), which suggests continued skull growth in patients who underwent EAS. With the low rate of intra- or post-operative complications and promising results on revising the restricted skull sutures, EAS seems both a safe and effective therapeutic modality in patients with multisuture synostosis, especially if completed in the first months after birth.

Surgical Management in Isolated Squamosal Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Although craniosynostoses involving the major sutures have been well described, the frequency of isolated minor suture craniosynostoses is much lower. Squamosal craniosynostosis (SQS) is a rare form of cranial synostosis, and the paucity of literature has made the creation of a standardized treatment plan difficult. We present a systematic review of the literature on isolated SQS to identify disease characteristics that lead to a need for operative intervention and to delineate patterns in surgical management. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed using the electronic databases of PubMed, Scopus, and MEDLINE and the key words "squamosal AND craniosynostosis," "squamous AND craniosynostosis," "squamosal craniosynostosis, "squamosal suture craniosynostosis," and "isolated squamosal craniosynostosis." Only human studies that described presentation and management of SQS were included. A blinded, 2-reviewer analysis of the articles was performed. Data collected included patient and disease characteristics, imaging workup, and treatment specifics, which were analyzed by descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies examining 119 patients with SQS were reviewed, with 97 (82%) multisutural cases and 22 isolated cases (18%). Of the isolated cases, 6 (27%) required surgical craniosynostosis repair, of which 1 (17%) had unilateral sutural involvement and 5 (83%) had bilateral involvement. Of the patients with isolated SQS, 7 (32%) had a congenital syndrome and comprised 33% of patients who required surgical intervention. The nonsyndromic patients with isolated SQS who required surgery presented with a wide array of phenotypic findings; 3 patients underwent some form of cranial vault remodeling, whereas 1 patient underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt only. Of the 4 nonsyndromic patients with isolated SQS who underwent surgical repair, half required operative intervention because of elevated intracranial pressure and the other half because of dysmorphic head shape. CONCLUSION: The findings of this updated systematic review suggest a trend toward surgical management in bilateral SQS versus unilateral SQS, and that patients with isolated SQS, previously considered to be a nonsurgical finding, should be carefully monitored, as there remains risk of increased intracranial pressure. Pooled systematic review data suggest isolated SQS has a 27% operative intervention rate, with the presence of coexisting syndromic diagnoses increasing that risk.

Orbital Foraminal Morphometrics in Nonsyndromic Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis.

ABSTRACT: Nonsyndromic unilateral coronal craniosynostosis (UCS) is a rare congenital disorder that results from premature fusion of either coronal suture. The result is growth restriction across the suture, between the ipsilateral frontal and parietal bones, leading to bony dysmorphogenesis affecting the calvarium, orbit, and skull base. Prior studies have reported associations between UCS and visual abnormalities. The present study utilizes a novel geometric morphometric analysis to compare dimensions of orbital foramina on synostotic versus nonsynostotic sides in patients with UCS. Computed tomography head scans of pediatric UCS patients were converted into 3-dimensional mesh models. Anatomical borders of left and right orbital structures were plotted by a single trained team member. Dimensions between synostotic and nonsynostotic sides were measured and compared. Medical records were examined to determine prevalence of visual abnormalities in this patient cohort. Visual abnormalities were reported in 22 of the 27 UCS patients (77.8%). Astigmatism (66.7%), anisometropic amblyopia (44.4%), and motor nerve palsies (33.3%) represented the 3 most prevalent ophthalmologic abnormalities. Orbits on synostotic sides were 11.3% narrower ( P < 0.001) with 21.2% less volume ( P = 0.028) than orbits on nonsynostotic sides. However, average widths, circumferences, and areas were similar between synostotic and nonsynostotic sides upon comparison of supraorbital foramina, infraorbital foramina, optic foramina, and foramina ovalia. Therefore, previously proposed compression or distortion of vital neurovascular structures within bony orbital foramina does not seem to be a likely etiology of visual abnormalities in UCS patients. Future studies will examine the role of ocular and/or neuro-ophthalmologic pathology in this disease process.

Use of Neuronavigation in Suturectomy for Craniosynostosis.

Smaller operative exposures associated with suturectomy for craniosynostosis may result in difficulties visualizing the prematurely fused suture during surgery. The authors report cases of suturectomy for lambdoid and metopic craniosynostosis in which neuronavigation or frameless stereotaxy was used to assist with incision planning and intraoperative localization of the fused suture. In both cases, neuronavigation integrated easily and safely into established workflows and was associated with complete suture release. To our knowledge, this is the first report of applying this noninvasive technology, which does not require cranial pinning or rigid fixation, to suturectomy, and the authors demonstrate its use as an adjunct, especially for surgeons beginning in practice. Larger studies are needed to determine if neuronavigation in suturectomy is associated with a clinically significant reduction in blood loss or operative time or an increase in the rate of complete suturectomy.

Introduction of Spring-Assisted Cranioplasty for Sagittal Craniosynostosis in a Craniofacial Service: A Report of Early Experience.

Spring-assisted cranioplasty (SAC) for the treatment of craniosynostosis uses internal springs to produce dynamic changes in cranial shape over several months before its removal. The purpose of this study was to report the first Egyptian experiences with SAC in the treatment of children with sagittal synostosis and evaluate the preliminary outcome. A total of 17 consecutive patients with scaphocephaly underwent SAC with a midline osteotomy along the fused sagittal suture and insertion of 3 springs with bayonet-shaped ends across the opened suture. Operative time, blood transfusion requirements and length of ICU, total hospital stay, and complications graded according to Oxford protocol classification were recorded. Spring removal was performed once re-ossification of the cranial defect occurred. All patients successfully underwent SAC without significant complications. The mean age at surgery was 6.8 months. The mean time of the spring insertion surgery was 63 minutes (SD 9.7). Blood transfusion was needed in less than half of the patients (41.2%).The mean duration of hospital stay was 3.2 days. The mean timing of spring removal was 5.5 months (SD 0.4). The mean time of the second surgery (spring removal) was 22.8 minutes (SD 3.6). In conclusion, SAC can easily be incorporated into the treatment armamentarium of craniofacial surgeons. The technique offers a safe and minimally invasive option for the treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis with the benefit of limited dural undermining, minimal blood loss, operative time, anesthetic time, ICU stay, and hospital stay.

Presentation and Treatment of a Patient With Jacobs Syndrome and Metopic Craniosynostosis.

Jacobs syndrome is a rare trisomy (47, XYY) found in ~1 in 1000 male children associated with infertility, autism spectrum disorders, macrocephaly, hypertelorism, tall stature, and macroorchidism. Diagnosis is often delayed due to relatively subtle phenotypic changes. Craniosynostosis, a fusion of the cranial sutures, has been described in ~1 in 2000 live births, of which 25% are related to a diagnosed syndrome with the most common being Apert and Crouzon. Craniosynostosis does not have a known association with Jacobs syndrome and no prior cases have been reported. This case report seeks to describe the presentation and treatment of a patient with Jacobs syndrome and metopic craniosynostosis.

Fusion of Lateral Calvarial Sutures on Volume-Rendered Computed Tomography Reconstructions in Patients With Known Craniosynostosis.

INTRODUCTION: After treating a child with familial sagittal craniosynostosis, clinocephaly, and bilateral parietomastoid/posterior squamosal suture fusion, the authors wondered if major-suture synostosis and clinocephaly were associated with abnormal fusion of minor lateral calvarial sutures. METHODS: The authors reviewed all preoperative volume-rendered head computed tomography reconstructions performed for craniosynostosis at their institution from 2010 through 2014 and determined whether the sphenoparietal, squamosal, and parietomastoid sutures were open, partially fused, or fused. The authors determined whether any sutures were abnormally fused based upon a previous study from their center, in which abnormal fusion was defined as either 1 of 3 abnormal fusion patterns or abnormally-early fusion. The authors then determined the rate of abnormal fusion of these sutures and whether abnormal fusion was associated with (1) major-suture craniosynostosis, (2) type of craniosynostosis (sutures involved; single-suture versus multisuture; syndromic versus nonsyndromic), and (3) clinocephaly. RESULTS: In 97 included children, minor lateral sutures were abnormally fused in 8, or 8.2%, which was significantly higher than in children without craniosynostosis from our earlier study. Abnormal minor lateral suture fusion was not associated with the type of single-suture synostosis or with multisuture synostosis but was associated with syndromic synostosis. Four of 8 children with abnormal minor lateral suture fusion had multisuture synostosis and 6 had syndromic synostosis. Lateral sutures were abnormally fused in 1 of 4 subjects with clinocephaly, which was not significant. CONCLUSION: Abnormal minor lateral calvarial suture fusion is significantly associated with major-suture craniosynostosis, especially syndromic synostosis.

A Novel Phenotype of Calvarial Thickening and Increased Rates of Premature Calvarial Suture Closure in Children With Chronic Lung Disease.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to characterize a novel type of calvarial thickening and provide objective measurements of skull thickness and calvarial suture morphology in patients with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. METHODS: Infants with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia who also had undergone computed tomography (CT) scans were identified from the neonatal chronic lung disease program database. Thickness analysis was performed using Materialise Mimics. RESULTS: The chronic lung disease team treated 319 patients during the study interval of which, 58 patients (18.2%) had head CT available. Twenty-eight (48.3%) were found to have calvarial thickening. The rate of premature suture closure in the study population was 36.2% (21 of 58 patients), with 50.0% of affected cohort having evidence of premature suture closure on the first CT scan. Multivariate logistic regression identified 2 risk factors, requiring invasive ventilation at 6 months of age and fraction of inspired oxygen requirement at 6 months of age. Increased head circumference at birth protected against the development of calvarial thickening. CONCLUSIONS: We have described a novel subset of patients with chronic lung disease of prematurity who have calvarial thickening with remarkably high rates of premature closure of cranial sutures. The exact etiology of the association is unknown. In this patient population with radiographic evidence of premature suture closure, operative decision should be made after considering unequivocal evidence of elevated intracranial pressure or dysmorphology and balanced against the risk of the procedure.

A Systematic Review of Idiopathic Secondary Stenosis Following Index Surgery for Craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: Primary craniosynostosis is a congenital craniofacial disorder in which cranial sutures prematurely close. Iatrogenic secondary stenosis is abnormal cranial suture closure caused by surgical manipulation of the suture. In contrast, idiopathic secondary stenosis develops in a suture that did not undergo surgical manipulation. The objective of this systematic review was to consolidate and characterize the incidence, classification, and management of idiopathic secondary stenosis in the literature. METHODS: Literature from PubMed, Web Of Science, and EMBASE from 1970 to March 2022 was reviewed. The following information was extracted for individual patients: incidence of idiopathic secondary stenosis, index primary craniosynostosis, primary surgical correction, presenting signs of secondary stenosis, management, and further complications. RESULTS: Seventeen articles detailing 1181 patients were included. Ninety-one developed idiopathic secondary stenosis (7.7%). Only 3 of these patients were syndromic. The most common index craniosynostosis was sagittal synostosis (83.5%). The most common suture undergoing idiopathic secondary stenosis was the coronal suture (91.2%). Patients presented at a median age of 24 months. The most common presenting sign was a radiologic finding (85.7%), although some patients presented with headache or head deformity. Only 2 patients, both syndromic, had complications following surgical correction of secondary stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Idiopathic secondary stenosis is a rare, long-term complication following index surgical repair of craniosynostosis. It can occur following any surgical technique. It most commonly affects the coronal suture but can affect any of the sutures, including pansynostosis. Surgical correction is curative in nonsyndromic patients.

Can Craniosynostosis be Diagnosed on Physical Examination? A Retrospective Review.

Craniosynostosis is a developmental craniofacial defect in which one or more sutures of the skull fuse together prematurely. Uncorrected craniosynostosis may have serious complications including elevated intracranial pressure, developmental delay, and blindness. Proper diagnosis of craniosynostosis requires a physical examination of the head with assessment for symmetry and palpation of sutures for prominence. Often, if craniosynostosis is suspected, computed tomography (CT) imaging will be obtained. Recent literature has posited that this is unnecessary. This study aims to address whether physical examination alone is sufficient for the diagnosis and treatment planning of single suture craniosynostosis. Between 2015 and 2022, the Divisions of Pediatric Neurosurgery and Pediatric Plastic Surgery at UTHealth Houston evaluated 140 children under 36 months of age with suspected craniosynostosis by physical examination and subsequently ordered CT imaging for preoperative planning. Twenty-three patients received a clinical diagnosis of multi-sutural or syndromic craniosynostosis that was confirmed by CT. One hundred seventeen patients were diagnosed with single suture craniosynostosis on clinical examination and follow-up CT confirmed suture fusion in 109 (93.2%) patients and identified intracranial anomalies in 7 (6.0%) patients. These patients underwent surgical correction. Eight (6.8%) patients showed no evidence of craniosynostosis on CT imaging. Treatment for patients without fused sutures included molding helmets and observation alone. This evidence suggests that physical examination alone may be inadequate to accurately diagnose single suture synostosis, and surgery without preoperative CT evaluation could lead to unindicated procedures.

Utilizing Computer-Assisted Design and Virtual Surgical Planning for Correction of Unilateral Lambdoid Synostosis.

Unilateral lambdoid synostosis is the rarest form of single-suture craniosynostosis. Although various surgical approaches have been described, cranial vault remodeling remains the predominant approach. To aid in surgical planning, preoperative virtual surgical modeling using a patient's presenting computed tomography scan can be used to increase reconstructive precision and to reduce operative time. Presented is a 7-month-old male with unilateral lambdoid synostosis who underwent medically modeled cranial vault reconstruction.

The Clinical Significance of Clinocephaly in Late-Presentation Sagittal Craniosynostosis.

The diagnosis of late-presentation sagittal suture craniosynostosis (SCS) can be challenging, especially in the setting of subtle physical exam findings. The clinical significance of clinocephaly-a retro-coronal concavity along the midvault-in this context remains unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate the predictive value of clinocephaly in identifying late-presentation SCS.A retrospective chart review of all patients >1 year old presenting to the craniofacial clinic with a concern for SCS was performed. The presence or absence of SCS in the setting of clinocephaly was recorded following diagnostic imaging. Student's t test, Chi Square test, and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to determine predictors for SCS.75 patients met inclusion criteria. 32 patients (42.7%, 6% female) were diagnosed with SCS. No difference in age between patients with and without SCS was detected. Stratification of patients by age (1-2, 2-4, and >4 years) revealed a higher rate of SCS in younger patients (P = 0.04). The cephalic index (C.I.) of those with sagittal synostosis was significantly smaller but within the normal range, indicating a more scaphocephalic shape (P = 0.003). Logistic regression analysis revealed that C.I. was a strong predictor for SCS (P = 0.003). Of those with SCS, a mix of complete and partial fusion of the sagittal suture was appreciated.This study found that 42.7% of patients with clinocephaly had SCS. C.I. was the only predictor for SCS and unique suture fusion patterns were identified in those with SCS. This study suggests that clinocephaly should be considered a core component of the exam and work-up for SCS. Future studies aimed at evaluating the positive predictive value of this exam finding and identifying risk factors associated with late-presentation SCS are underway.

Primary Delayed Onset Craniosynostosis in a Child With ERF-Related Craniosynostosis Syndrome and Familial Cerebral Cavernous Malformation Syndrome.

Primary delayed onset craniosynostosis is defined as premature suture fusion that developed despite clear radiographic evidence of normal postnatal calvarial configuration and patent sutures earlier in life. It is rare in the literature and typically presents as secondary synostosis. In this brief clinical study, primary delayed onset craniosynostosis is described in its unique presentation at 4 years of age with a complex genetic history including ERF-related craniosynostosis syndrome and familial cerebral cavernous malformation syndrome. Although the delayed onset clinical course of ERF-related craniosynostosis syndrome has not been well described in the literature, our review suggests that it is distinctive to ERF-related craniosynostosis and should be considered when cases present without a history of trauma, when there is a positive family history, and particularly when cases present late onset; after 1 year of age.