Durable Approaches to Recurrent Rectal Prolapse Repair May Require Avoidance of Index Procedure.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of recurrent rectal prolapse is associated with unique technical challenges, partially determined by the surgical approach used for the index operation. Success rates are variable, and data to determine the best approach in patients with recurring prolapse are lacking. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess current surgical approaches to patients with prior rectal prolapse repairs and to compare short-term outcomes of de novo and redo procedures, including recurrence of rectal prolapse. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database. SETTINGS: The Multicenter Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium Prospective Quality Improvement database. De-identified surgeons at more than 25 sites (81% high volume) self-reported patient demographics, prior repairs, symptoms of incontinence and obstructed defecation, and operative details, including history of concomitant repairs and prior prolapse repairs. PATIENTS: Patients who were offered surgery for full thickness rectal prolapse. INTERVENTIONS: Incidence and type of repair used for prior rectal prolapse surgery were recorded. Primary and secondary outcomes of index and redo operations were calculated. Patients undergoing rectal prolapse re-repair (redo) were compared with patients undergoing first (de novo) rectal prolapse repair. The incidence of rectal prolapse recurrence in de novo and redo operations was quantified. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome of rectal prolapse recurrence in de novo and redo settings. RESULTS: Eighty-nine (19.3%) of 461 patients underwent redo rectal prolapse repair. On short-term follow-up, redo patients had prolapse recurrence rates similar to those undergoing de novo repair. However, patients undergoing redo procedures rarely had the same operation as their index procedure. LIMITATIONS: Self-reported, de-identified data. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that recurrent rectal prolapse surgery is feasible and can offer adequate rates of rectal prolapse durability in the short term but may argue for a change in surgical approach for redo procedures when clinically feasible. See Video Abstract . LOS ENFOQUES DURADEROS PARA LA REPARACIN DEL PROLAPSO RECTAL RECURRENTE PUEDEN REQUERIR EVITAR EL PROCEDIMIENTO NDICE: ANTECEDENTES:El tratamiento quirúrgico del prolapso rectal recurrente se asocia con desafíos técnicos únicos, determinados en parte por el abordaje quirúrgico utilizado para la operación inicial. Las tasas de éxito son variables y faltan datos para determinar el mejor abordaje en pacientes con prolapso recurrente.OBJETIVO:Evaluar los enfoques quirúrgicos actuales para pacientes con reparaciones previas de prolapso rectal y comparar los resultados a corto plazo de los procedimientos de novo y rehacer, incluida la recurrencia del prolapso rectal.DISEÑO:Análisis retrospectivo de una base de datos prospectiva.AJUSTE:Base de datos de mejora prospectiva de la calidad del Consorcio multicéntrico de trastornos del suelo pélvico. Cirujanos no identificados en más de 25 sitios (81% de alto volumen) informaron datos demográficos de los pacientes, reparaciones previas, síntomas de incontinencia y defecación obstruida y detalles operativos, incluido el historial de reparaciones concomitantes y reparaciones previas de prolapso.INTERVENCIONES:Se registro la incidencia y el tipo de reparación utilizada para la cirugía de prolapso rectal previa. Se calcularon los resultados primarios y secundarios de las operaciones de índice y reoperacion. Se compararon los pacientes sometidos a una nueva reparación (reoperacion) de prolapso rectal con pacientes sometidos a una primera reparación (de novo) de prolapso rectal. Se cuantificó la incidencia de recurrencia del prolapso rectal en operaciones de novo y rehacer.RESULTADOS:El resultado primario de recurrencia del prolapso rectal en entornos de novo y redo. Ochenta y nueve (19,3%) de 461 pacientes se sometieron a una nueva reparación del prolapso rectal. En el seguimiento a corto plazo, los pacientes reoperados tuvieron tasas de recurrencia de prolapso similares a los de los sometidos a reparación de novo. Sin embargo, los pacientes sometidos a procedimientos de rehacer rara vez tuvieron la misma operación que su procedimiento índice.LIMITACIONES:Datos no identificados y autoinformados.CONCLUSIONES/DISCUSIÓN:Nuestros resultados sugieren que la cirugía de prolapso rectal recurrente es factible y puede ofrecer tasas adecuadas de durabilidad del prolapso rectal en el corto plazo, pero puede abogar por un cambio en el enfoque quirúrgico para rehacer los procedimientos cuando sea clínicamente factible. (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).

Risk Factors for Persistent Postoperative Opioid Use After Surgery for IBD: An Observational Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with IBD are at increased risk of persistent opioid use, wherein surgery plays an important role. OBJECTIVE: Identify risk factors for persistent postoperative opioid use in patients with IBD undergoing GI surgery and describe in-hospital postoperative opioid treatment. DESIGN: This was a retrospective observational cohort study. ORs for persistent postoperative opioid use were calculated using preoperative and in-hospital characteristics, and in-hospital opioid use was described using oral morphine equivalents. SETTING: This study was conducted at a university hospital with a dedicated IBD surgery unit. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent surgery for IBD from 2017 to 2022 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Our main outcome measure was persistent postoperative opioid use (1 or more opioid prescriptions filled 3-9 months postoperatively). RESULTS: We included 384 patients, of whom 36 (9.4%) had persistent postoperative opioid use, but only 11 (2.9%) of these patients were opioid naive preoperatively. We identified World Health Organization performance status >1 (OR 8.21; 95% CI, 1.19-48.68), preoperative daily opioid use (OR 12.84; 95% CI, 4.78-35.36), psychiatric comorbidity (OR 3.89; 95% CI, 1.29-11.43) and in-hospital mean daily opioid use (per 10 oral morphine equivalent increase; OR 1.22; 95% CI, 1.12-1.34) as risk factors for persistent postoperative opioid use using multivariable regression analysis. LIMITATIONS: Our observational study design and limited sample size because of it being a single-center study resulted in wide CIs. CONCLUSIONS: We identified risk factors for persistent postoperative opioid use in patients undergoing surgery for IBD. Results indicate a need for optimization of pain treatment in patients with IBD both before and after surgery. These patients might benefit from additional opioid-sparing measures. See Video Abstract. FACTORES DE RIESGO EN LA ADMINISTRACION DURADERA DE OPIOIDES EN EL POSTOPERATORIO EN CASOS DE CIRUGA POR ENFERMEDAD INFLAMATORIA INTESTINAL ESTUDIO OBSERVACIONAL DE COHORTES: ANTECEDENTES:Los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) tienen un mayor riesgo de recibir opioides de manera duradera, casos donde la cirugía juega un papel importante.OBJETIVO:Identificar los factores de riesgo en la administración duradera de opioides en el post-operatorio de cirugía gastrointestinal en casos de EII y describir el tratamiento intra-hospitalario con los mismos.DISEÑO:Estudio observacional retrospectivo de cohortes. La relación de probabilidades (odds ratio - OR) en la adminstracion duradera de opioides post-operatorios fué calculada utilizando las características pré-operatorias y hospitalarias, donde la administración de opioides intra-hospitalarios fué descrita con la utilización de equivalentes de morfina oral.AMBIENTE:Estudio realizado en un hospital universitario con una unidad de cirugía dedicada a la EII.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron todos los pacientes sometidos a cirugía por EII entre 2017 y 2022.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Nuestra principal medida de resultado fué la administración post-operatoria duradera de opioides (≥1 receta completa de opioides entre 3 y 9 meses después de la operación).RESULTADOS:Incluimos 384 pacientes, de los cuales 36 (9,4%) recibieron opioides de manera duradera en el post-operatorio, de los cuales solamente 11 pacientes (2,9%) no habían recibido opioides antes de la operación. Identificamos el estado funcional de la OMS > 1 (OR 8,21, IC 95% 1,19-48,68), el uso diario de opioides pré-operatorios (OR 12,84, IC 95% 4,78-35,36), los casos de comorbilidad psiquiátrica (OR 3,89, IC 95% 1,29-11,43) y el uso medio diario de opioides en el hospital (por cada aumento de 10 equivalentes de morfina oral) (OR 1,22, IC del 95%: 1,12-1,34 como factores de riesgo para la administración de opioides de manera duradera en el post-operatorio mediante el análisis de regresión multivariable.LIMITACIONES:Nuestro diseño de estudio observacional y el tamaño de la muestra limitada debido a que fue un estudio en un solo centro, dando como resultado intervalos de confianza muy amplios.CONCLUSIONES:Se identificaron los factores de riesgo en la administración duradera de opioides en el post-operatorio de cirugía gastrointestinal en casos de EII. Los resultados demuestran la necesidad de optimizar el tratamiento del dolor en pacientes con EII, tanto antes como después de la cirugía. Estos pacientes podrían beneficiarse de medidas adicionales de ahorro de opioides. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo).

A comprehensive scoring system for the better prediction of bowel resection in pediatric intussusception.

BACKGROUND: Intussusception presents a significant emergency that often necessitates bowel resection, leading to severe complications and management challenges. This study aims to investigate and establish a scoring system to enhance the prediction of bowel resection necessity in pediatric intussusception patients. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 660 hospitalized patients with intussusception who underwent surgical management at a pediatric hospital in Southwest China from April 2008 to December 2020. The necessity of bowel resection was assessed and categorized in this cohort. Variables associated with bowel resection were examined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Based on these analyses, a scoring system was developed, grounded on the summation of the coefficients (ß). RESULTS: Among the 660 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 218 required bowel resection during surgery. Bowel resection occurrence was linked to an extended duration of symptoms (Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.14; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 1.03-5.23; P = 0.0015), the presence of gross bloody stool (OR = 8.98; 95% CI, 1.76-48.75, P < 0.001), elevated C-reactive protein levels (OR = 4.79; 95% CI, 1.12-28.31, P = 0.0072), lactate clearance rate (LCR) (OR = 17.25; 95% CI, 2.36-80.35; P < 0.001), and the intussusception location (OR = 12.65; 95% CI, 1.46-62.67, P < 0.001), as determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis. A scoring system (totaling 14.02 points) was developed from the cumulative ß coefficients, with a threshold of 5.22 effectively differentiating infants requiring surgical intervention from others with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), exhibiting a sensitivity of 78.3% and a specificity of 71.9%. CONCLUSIONS: This study successfully identified multiple risk factors for bowel resection and effectively used a scoring system to identify patients for optimal clinical management.

Comparison of outcomes in small bowel surgery for Crohn's disease: a retrospective NSQIP review.

INTRODUCTION: Despite advances in medical therapy, approximately 33% of Crohn's disease (CD) patients will need surgery within 5 years after initial diagnosis. Several surgical approaches to CD have been proposed including small bowel resection, strictureplasty, and combined surgery with resection plus strictureplasty. Here, we utilize the American College of Surgeons (ACS) national surgical quality registry (NSQIP) to perform a comprehensive analysis of 30-day outcomes between these three surgical approaches for CD. METHODS: The authors queried the ACS-NSQIP database between 2015 and 2020 for all patients undergoing open or laparoscopic resection of small bowel or strictureplasty for CD using CPT and IC-CM 10. Outcomes of interest included length of stay, discharge disposition, wound complications, 30-day related readmission, and reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 2578 patients were identified; 87% of patients underwent small bowel resection, 5% resection with strictureplasty, and 8% strictureplasty alone. Resection plus strictureplasty (combined surgery) was associated with the longest operative time (p = 0.002). Patients undergoing small bowel resection had the longest length of hospital stay (p = 0.030) and the highest incidence of superficial/deep wound infection (44%, p = 0.003) as well as the highest incidence of sepsis (3.5%, p = 0.03). Small bowel resection was found to be associated with higher odds of wound complication compared to combined surgery (OR 2.09, p = 0.024) and strictureplasty (1.9, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that various surgical approaches for CD are associated with comparable outcomes in 30-day related reoperation and readmission, or disposition following surgery between all three surgical approaches. However, small bowel resection displayed higher odds of developing post-operative wound complications.

MRI-defined T3, clear mesorectal fascia mid-low rectal cancer: is neoadjuvant treatment necessary?

AIM: Neoadjuvant treatments (nCRT) are becoming the standard treatment for patients with stage II or III mid-low rectal cancer. Recently, some studies have shown that surgery alone may be sufficient for patients with T3 rectal cancer. This raises the question of whether nCRT is necessary for all patients with T3 rectal cancer. Therefore, this study compared the clinical outcomes of patients with MRI-defined T3, clear MRF mid-low rectal cancer treated with surgery alone (TME group) or nCRT followed by surgery (nCRT + TME group). METHODS: A total of 1509 patients were enrolled in this study. After a 1:1 propensity score matching analysis, 480 patients were included in each group. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints included the perioperative outcomes, histopathologic outcomes, and other follow-up outcomes. RESULTS: nCRT had advantages in rates of sphincter-preserving surgery and tumor downstaging, but it was accompanied by a higher rate of enterostomies. At 3 years after surgery, local recurrence occurred in 3.3% of patients in the TME group and in 3.5% of patients in the nCRT + TME group (P = 0.914), the DFS rates were 78.3% in the TME group and 75.3% in the nCRT + TME group (P = 0.188), and the overall survival rates were 90.3% in the TME group and 89.9% in the nCRT + TME group (P = 0.776). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery alone versus nCRT followed by surgery may provide similar long-term oncological outcomes for patients with MRI-defined T3, clear MRF, and mid-low rectal cancer. nCRT may cause overtreatment in some patients.

Subtotal fistulectomy and sliding anoderm flap: A new sphincter-sparing technique for anal fistula.

AIM: The underlying causes of failure or recurrence after ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract are postulated to be refistulization, breakdown of the closure wound in the intersphincteric plane and faecal contents entering the internal opening, thereby causing recurrent infection. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the outcomes of subtotal fistulectomy with sliding anoderm flaps to prevent refistulization. METHOD: This retrospective study used prospectively collected data. Patients with transsphincteric or intersphincteric fistulas were enrolled between August 2021 and July 2023. An anal manometric study was performed before and after surgery. Faecal incontinence was evaluated using the faecal incontinence severity index (FISI). Failure was defined as nonhealing of the surgical wound or fistula. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients who underwent subtotal fistulectomy with a sliding anoderm flap were included. After a median follow-up of 12 months (range 4-27 months), primary healing was achieved in 49 patients (96%). Two patients experienced treatment failure, while none developed postoperative recurrence. The median healing time was 10 weeks (range 6-24 weeks). The FISI scores did not change significantly after the surgery. The median resting pressure significantly reduced after surgery [125 cmH2O (range 59-204 cmH2O) vs. 99 cmH2O (range 36-176 cmH2O); p = 0.0001]. The median squeeze pressure significantly decreased after surgery [356 cmH2O (range 137-579 cmH2O) vs. 329 cmH2O (range 72-594 cmH2O; p = 0.005)]. CONCLUSION: Subtotal fistulectomy with a sliding anoderm flap showed excellent healing rates with no postoperative deterioration of anal function.

Artificial intelligence-aided ultrasound imaging in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: where are we now?

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) models have been applied in various medical imaging modalities and surgical disciplines, however the current status and progress of ultrasound-based AI models within hepatopancreatobiliary surgery have not been evaluated in literature. Therefore, this review aimed to provide an overview of ultrasound-based AI models used for hepatopancreatobiliary surgery, evaluating current advancements, validation, and predictive accuracies. METHOD: Databases PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched for studies using AI models on ultrasound for patients undergoing hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. To be eligible for inclusion, studies needed to apply AI methods on ultrasound imaging for patients undergoing hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. The Probast risk of bias tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality of AI methods. RESULTS: AI models have been primarily used within hepatopancreatobiliary surgery, to predict tumor recurrence, differentiate between tumoral tissues, and identify lesions during ultrasound imaging. Most studies have combined radiomics with convolutional neural networks, with AUCs up to 0.98. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-based AI models have demonstrated promising accuracies in predicting early tumoral recurrence and even differentiating between tumoral tissue types during and after hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. However, prospective studies are required to evaluate if these results will remain consistent and externally valid.

Advancing minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: barriers to adoption and equitable access.

BACKGROUND: Despite a growing body of literature supporting the safety of robotic hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) procedures, the adoption of minimally invasive techniques in HPB surgery has been slow compared to other specialties. We aimed to identify barriers to implementing robotic assisted surgery (RAS) in HPB and present a framework that highlights opportunities to improve adoption. METHODS: A modified nominal group technique guided by a 13-question framework was utilized. The meeting session was guided by senior authors, and field notes were also collected. Results were reviewed and free text responses were analyzed for major themes. A follow-up priority setting survey was distributed to all participants based on meeting results. RESULTS: Twenty three surgeons with varying robotic HPB experience from different practice settings participated in the discussion. The majority of surgeons identified operating room efficiency, having a dedicated operating room team, and the overall hospital culture and openness to innovation as important facilitators of implementing a RAS program. In contrast, cost, capacity building, disparities/risk of regionalization, lack of evidence, and time/effort were identified as the most significant barriers. When asked to prioritize the most important issues to be addressed, participants noted access and availability of the robot as the most important issue, followed by institutional support, cost, quality of supporting evidence, and need for robotic training. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports surgeons' perceptions of major barriers to equitable access and increased implementation of robotic HPB surgery. To overcome such barriers, defining key resources, adopting innovative solutions, and developing better methods of collecting long term data should be the top priorities.

Malpractice claims after antireflux surgery and paraesophageal hernia repair: a population-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: The complication rate of modern antireflux surgery or paraesophageal hernia repair is unknown, and previous estimates have been extrapolated from institutional cohorts. METHODS: A population-based retrospective cohort study of patient injury cases involving antireflux surgery and paraesophageal hernia repair from the Finnish National Patient Injury Centre (PIC) register between Jan 2010 and Dec 2020. Additionally, the baseline data of all the patients who underwent antireflux and paraesophageal hernia operations between Jan 2010 and Dec 2018 were collected from the Finnish national care register. RESULTS: During the study period, 5734 operations were performed, and the mean age of the patients was 54.9 ± 14.7 years, with 59.3% (n = 3402) being women. Out of all operations, 341 (5.9%) were revision antireflux or paraesophageal hernia repair procedures. Antireflux surgery was the primary operation for 79.9% (n = 4384) of patients, and paraesophageal hernia repair was the primary operation for 20.1% (n = 1101) of patients. A total of 92.5% (5302) of all the operations were laparoscopic. From 2010 to 2020, 60 patient injury claims were identified, with half (50.0%) of the claims being related to paraesophageal hernia repair. One of the claims was made due to an injury that resulted in a patient's death (1.7%). The mean Comprehensive Complication Index scores were 35.9 (± 20.7) and 47.6 (± 20.8) (p = 0.033) for antireflux surgery and paraesophageal hernia repair, respectively. Eleven (18.3%) of the claims pertained to redo surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of antireflux surgery has diminished and the rate of paraesophageal hernia repair has risen in Finland during the era of minimally invasive surgery. Claims to the PIC remain rare, but claims regarding paraesophageal hernia repairs and redo surgery are overrepresented. Additionally, paraesophageal hernia repair is associated with more serious complications.

Low-calorie diets are effective for weight loss in patients undergoing benign upper gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Obesity may increase surgical complexity in patients undergoing abdominal surgery by limiting visualization and increasing the risk of peri-operative complications. A preoperative reduction in weight and liver volume may improve surgical outcomes. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of a low-calorie diet (LCD) versus a very low-calorie diet (VLCD) in reducing weight and liver volume prior to laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using the following inclusion criteria: obese patients undergoing preoperative weight loss using a VLCD or LCD, evaluation of liver volume reduction, and the use of an imaging modality before and after the diet. RESULTS: A total of 814 patients from 21 different studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis, with 544 female patients (66.8%) and a mean age range between 24 and 54 years old. There was a total mean weight loss of 6.42% and mean liver volume reduction of 16.7%. Meta-analysis demonstrated that a preoperative diet (LCD or VLCD) significantly reduced weight [SMD = - 0.68; 95% CI (- 0.93, - 0.42), I2 = 82%, p ≤ 0.01] and liver volume [SMD = - 2.03; 95% CI (- 4.00, - 0.06), I2 = 94%, p ≤ 0.01]. When assessed individually, a VLCD led to significant weight reduction [SMD = - 0.79; CI (- 1.24; - 0.34), p ≤ 0.01, I2 = 90%], as did an LCD [SMD = - 0.60; CI (- 0.90; - 0.29), p ≤ 0.01, I2 = 68%). Similarly, there was a significant reduction in liver volume following a VLCD [SMD = - 1.40; CI (- 2.77, - 0.03), p ≤ 0.01, I2 = 96%], and an LCD [SMD = - 2.66; CI (- 6.13, 0.81), p ≤ 0.01, I2 = 93%]. However, there was no significant difference between the two regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative restrictive calorie diets are effective in reducing weight and liver volume prior to laparoscopic surgery. Whilst a VLCD was better than an LCD at reducing both weight and liver volume, the difference was not significant.

Introduction of a new surgical robot platform "hinotori™" in an institution with established da Vinci surgery™ for digestive organ operations.

BACKGROUND: New platforms for robotic surgery have recently become available for clinical use; however, information on the introduction of new surgical robotic platforms compared with the da Vinci™ surgical system is lacking. In this study, we retrospectively determined the safe introduction of the new "hinotori™" surgical robot in an institution with established da Vinci surgery using four representative digestive organ operations. METHODS: Sixty-one patients underwent robotic esophageal, gastric, rectal, and pancreatic operations using the hinotori system in our department in 2023. Among these, 22 patients with McKeown esophagectomy, 12 with distal gastrectomy, 11 with high- and low-anterior resection of the rectum, and eight with distal pancreatectomy procedures performed by hinotori were compared with historical controls treated using da Vinci surgery. RESULTS: The console (cockpit) operation time for distal gastrectomy and rectal surgery was shorter in the hinotori group compared with the da Vinci procedure, and there were no significant differences in the console times for the other two operations. Other surgical results were almost similar between the two robot surgical groups. Notably, the console times for hinotori surgeries showed no significant learning curves, determined by the cumulative sum method, for any of the operations, with similar values to the late phase of da Vinci surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that no additional learning curve might be required to achieve proficient surgical outcomes using the new hinotori surgical robotic platform, compared with the established da Vinci surgery.

Improving diagnosis of early complications (<1 week) through continuous vital sign monitoring following oncological gastrointestinal surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing major oncological abdominal surgery are prone to postoperative complications, making early recognition crucial. Clinical deterioration is often preceded by changes in vital signs, which are typically measured thrice a day by a nurse. However, intermittent measurements may delay recognizing clinical deterioration. Continuous vital parameter monitoring may lead to earlier recognition and management of complications and reduce nursing workload. OBJECTIVE: To compare vital parameter measurements between ward nurses and a wireless continuous monitoring system (Sensium® wireless patch) and assess whether this patch can detect clinical deterioration earlier in patients with complications in the first postoperative week. METHODS: Vital parameters (heart rate, respiratory rate, and temperature) were collected in patients undergoing an oncological resection of the liver, colorectal, or pancreas. Sensium® patch measurements were compared to nurses' measurements to assess the percentages of discordant measurements. In patients with complications in the first postoperative week, time discrepancies between nurses and Sensium® patch measurements were identified in cases of clinical deterioration (respiratory rate ≥15/min, heart rate ≥100/min, and temperature ≥38°C). RESULTS: Among 227 patients, 22% of the patients experienced complications. Nurse and Sensium® measurements were discrepant in 586/2272 measurements (26%). In 506/586 discrepancies (86%), this was due to the respiratory rate (difference ≥4/min). Compared to nurses, the Sensium® patch detected an elevated respiratory rate 14 h earlier and heart rate 2 h earlier within complications in the first postoperative week. For temperature, no difference was observed. CONCLUSION: Continuous monitoring with the Sensium® wireless patch holds promise for earlier recognition of complications in patients who underwent major oncological abdominal surgery.

Impact of surgical specialization on emergency upper gastrointestinal surgery outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Emergency presentations make up a large proportion of a general surgeon's workload. Patients who have emergency surgery carry a higher rate of mortality and complications. We aim to review the impact of surgical subspecialization on patients following upper gastrointestinal (UGI) emergency surgery. METHODS: A systematic search of Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases using a predefined search strategy was completed reviewing studies published from 1st of January 1990 to August 27, 2023. The study was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022359326). Studies were reviewed for the following outcomes: 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, conversion to open, length of stay, return to theater, and readmission. RESULTS: Of 5181 studies, 24 articles were selected for full text review. Of these, seven were eligible and included in this study. There was a statistically significant improvement in 30-day mortality favoring UGI specialists (OR 0.71 [95% CI 0.55-0.92 and p = 0.009]) and in-hospital mortality (OR 0.29 [95% CI 0.14-0.60 and p = 0009]). There was a high degree of study heterogeneity in 30-day mortality; however, a low degree of heterogeneity within in-hospital mortality. There was no statistical significance when considering conversion to open and insufficient data to allow meta-analysis for return to theater or readmission rates. CONCLUSION: In emergency UGI surgery, there was improved 30-day and in-hospital mortality for UGI specialists. Therefore, surgeons should consider early involvement of a subspecialist team to improve patient outcomes.

A discrete-event simulation model for assessing operating room efficiency of thoracic, gastrointestinal, and orthopedic surgeries.

BACKGROUND: In hospital management, pinpointing steps that most enhance operating room (OR) throughput is challenging. While prior literature has utilized discrete event simulation (DES) to study specific strategies such as scheduling and resource allocation, our study examines an earlier planning phase, assessing all workflow stages to determine the most impactful steps for subsequent strategy development. METHODS: DES models real-world systems by simulating sequential events. We constructed a DES model for thoracic, gastrointestinal, and orthopedic surgeries summarized from a tertiary Chinese hospital. The model covers preoperative preparations, OR occupation, and OR preparation. Parameters were sourced from patient data and staff experience. Model outcome is OR throughput. Post-validation, scenario analyses were conducted for each department, including: (1) improving preoperative patient preparation time; (2) increasing PACU beds; (3) improving OR preparation time; (4) use of new equipment to reduce the operative time of a selected surgery type; three levels of improvement (slight, moderate, large) were investigated. RESULTS: The first three improvement scenarios resulted in a 1%-5% increase in OR throughput across the three departments. Large reductions in operative time of the selected surgery types led to approximately 12%, 33%, and 38% increases in gastrointestinal, thoracic, and orthopedic surgery throughput, respectively. Moderate reductions resulted in 6%-17% increases in throughput and slight reductions of 1%-7%. CONCLUSIONS: The model could reliably reflect OR workflows of the three departments. Among the options investigated, model simulations suggest that improving OR preparation time and operative time are the most effective.

Urgency adjusted outcomes of emergency abdominal surgery for inflammatory bowel disease.

INTRODUCTION: Patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are a complex cohort who are relatively poorly represented in published literature. This is partly due to the lack of consensus of the definition of the term emergency in IBD surgery. There is ongoing and recent work defining clinical urgency for unplanned surgical procedures and categorizing the high-risk surgical patient. This paper aims to report the difference in patient metrics and risks as recorded by the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA). METHODS: Complete patient data, including histology, were available in the NELA database between 2013 and 2016. Urgency categories recorded by NELA are <2 h, 2-6 h, 6-18 h, and >18 h. Patient characteristics, physiology, biochemistry, and outcomes are reported according to these urgency categories with regression analysis used to compare differences between them. RESULTS: Mortality in Crohn's disease (CD) ranged from 1.4% in the >18 h urgency to 14.6% in the most urgent. In ulcerative colitis (UC), this range was from 3.1% to 14.8%. In both CD and UC, there were significant trends in hemodynamic instability, serum white cell count, serum electrolytes and creatinine, and outcome measures length of stay and unplanned return to theater. CONCLUSIONS: Patients having emergency surgery for IBD are not a single cohort when considering physiology, blood biochemistry, or most importantly, outcomes. Risk counseling and management should reflect this. Hemodynamic changes are subtle and may be missed in this cohort.

Robotic Management of Recurrent Rectal Endometriosis After Previous Segmental Bowel Resection.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the management of recurrent bowel endometriosis after previous colorectal resection. DESIGN: Surgical video article. The local institutional board review was omitted due to the narration of surgical management. Patient consent was obtained. SETTING: A tertiary referral center. The patient first underwent segmental bowel resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum in the ENDORE randomized controlled trial in 2012 and then received a total hysterectomy in 2018. Five years later, she presented with recurrent nodules in the rectovaginal, left parametrium, and abdominal wall after discontinuing medical suppressive treatment. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic management using robotic assistance was employed to complete excision of the rectovaginal nodule. Disc excision was performed to remove rectal infiltration. The procedure started with rectal shaving and excision of vaginal infiltration . A traction stitch was placed over the limits of the rectal shaving area. The general surgeon placed a 28 mm circular anal stapler transanally and performed complete excision of the shaved rectal area. Anastomotic perfusion was checked with indocyanine green. A methylene blue enema test was conducted to rule out anastomotic leakage. Outcomes were favorable, with systematic self-catheterization during 5 postoperative weeks. No specific symptoms were related to the other 2 nodules, which were not removed. CONCLUSION: Rectal recurrences may occur long after colorectal resection and outside the limits of the previous surgery site. To accurately assess this risk, long-term follow-up of patients is mandatory.. Postoperative medical amenorrhea may play a role in recurrence prevention. Surgical management of recurrences may be challenging and focus on only those nodules responsible for symptoms so as to best preserve the organ's function and reduce postoperative morbidity.

Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for obese patients with rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: We aimed to analyze the risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) after low anterior resection (LAR) in obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 25 kg/m2) with rectal cancer. METHODS: Data were collected from four hundred two obese patients who underwent LAR for rectal cancer in 51 institutions. RESULTS: Forty-six (11.4%) patients had clinical AL. The median BMI (27 kg/m2) did not differ between the AL and non-AL groups. In the AL group, comorbid respiratory disease was more common (p = 0.025), and the median tumor size was larger (p = 0.002). The incidence of AL was 11.5% in the open surgery subgroup and 11.4% in the laparoscopic surgery subgroup. Among the patients who underwent open surgery, the AL group showed a male predominance (p = 0.04) in the univariate analysis, but it was not statistically significant in the multivariate analysis. Among the patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery, the AL group included a higher proportion of patients with comorbid respiratory disease (p = 0.003) and larger tumors (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Comorbid respiratory disease and tumor size were risk factors for AL in obese patients with rectal cancer. Careful perioperative respiratory management and appropriate selection of surgical procedures are required for obese rectal cancer patients with respiratory diseases.

Simple pelvimetry predicts the pelvic manipulation time in robot-assisted low and ultra-low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This study explored the difficulty factors in robot-assisted low and ultra-low anterior resection, focusing on simple measurements of the pelvic anatomy. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 61 patients who underwent robot-assisted low and ultra-low anterior resection for rectal cancer between October 2018 and April 2023. The relationship between the operative time in the pelvic phase and clinicopathological data, especially pelvic anatomical parameters measured on X-ray and computed tomography (CT), was evaluated. The operative time in the pelvic phase was defined as the time between mobilization from the sacral promontory and rectal resection. RESULTS: Robot-assisted low and ultra-low anterior resections were performed in 32 and 29 patients, respectively. The median operative time in the pelvic phase was 126 (range, 31-332) min. A multiple linear regression analysis showed that a short distance from the anal verge to the lower edge of the cancer, a narrow area comprising the iliopectineal line, short anteroposterior and transverse pelvic diameters, and a small angle of the pelvic mesorectum were associated with a prolonged operative time in the pelvic phase. CONCLUSION: Simple pelvic anatomical measurements using abdominal radiography and CT may predict the pelvic manipulation time in robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer.

Incidence and risk factors of bowel dysfunction after minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery and discrepancies between the Wexner score and the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score.

PURPOSE: Bowel dysfunction after sphincter-preserving-surgery (SPS) impacts quality of life. The Wexner score (WS) and the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score (LS) are instruments for assessing postoperative bowel dysfunction. We analyzed the incidence of and risk factors for each symptom and examined the discrepancies between the two scores. METHODS: A total of 142 patients with rectal cancer, who underwent minimally invasive SPS between May, 2018 and July, 2019, were included. A questionnaire survey using the two scores was given to the patients 2 years after SPS. RESULTS: Tumor location and preoperative radiotherapy were independent risk factors for major LARS. Intersphincteric resection with a hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA) was an independent risk factor for high WS. Among the patients who underwent HSA, 82% experienced incontinence for liquid stools, needed to wear pads, and suffered lifestyle alterations. Of the 35 patients with minor LARS, only 1 had a high WS, and 80.0% reported no lifestyle alterations. Among the 75 patients with major LARS, 58.7% had a low WS and 21.3% reported no lifestyle alterations. CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide practical data to help patients understand potential bowel dysfunction after SPS. The discrepancies between the WS and LS were clarified, and further efforts are required to utilize these scores in clinical practice.

Time-to-surgery paradigms: wait time and surgical outcomes in critically Ill patients who underwent emergency surgery for gastrointestinal perforation.

BACKGROUND: Waiting time for emergency abdominal surgery have been known to be linked to mortality. However, there is no clear consensus on the appropriated timing of surgery for gastrointestinal perforation. We investigated association between wait time and surgical outcomes in emergency abdominal surgery. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study evaluated adult patients who underwent emergency surgery for gastrointestinal perforations between January 2003 and September 2021. Risk-adjusted restricted cubic splines modeled the probability of each mortality according to wait time. The inflection point when mortality began to increase was used to define early and late surgery. Outcomes among propensity-score matched early and late surgical patients were compared using percent absolute risk differences (RDs, with 95% CIs). RESULTS: Mortality rates began to rise after 16 h of waiting. However, early and late surgery groups showed no significant differences in 30-day mortality (11.4% vs. 5.7%), ICU stay duration (4.3 ± 7.5 vs. 4.3 ± 5.2 days), or total hospital stay (17.4 ± 17.0 vs. 24.7 ± 23.4 days). Notably, patients waiting over 16 h had a significantly higher ICU readmission rate (8.6% vs. 31.4%). The APACHE II score was a significant predictor of 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Although we were unable to reveal significant differences in mortality in the subgroup analysis, we were able to find an inflection point of 16 h through the RCS curve technique. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Formal consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study, and ethical approval was obtained from the institutional research committee of our institution (B-2110-714-107) on 6 October 2021.