Proton pump inhibitors in esophageal atresia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is frequent and prolonged in esophageal atresia (EA) pediatric patients requiring routine use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). However, there are still controversies on the prophylactic use of PPIs and the efficacy of PPIs on GERD and EA complications in this special condition. The aim of the study is to assess the prophylactic use of PPIs in pediatric patients with EA and its complications. We, therefore, performed a systematic review including all reports on the subject from 1980 to 2022. We conducted meta-analysis of the pooled proportion of PPI-and no PPI groups using random effect model, meta-regression, and estimate heterogeneity by heterogeneity index I2 . Thirty-eight reports on the topic met the criteria selection, representing a cumulative 6044 patients with EA. Prophylactic PPI prescription during the first year of life does not appear to prevent GERD persistence at follow-up and is not associated with a significantly reduced rate of antireflux surgical procedures (ARP). PPIs improve peptic esophagitis and induce remission of eosinophilic esophagitis at a rate of 50%. Their effect on other GERD outcomes is uncertain. Evidence suggests that PPIs do not prevent anastomotic stricture, Barrett's esophagus, or respiratory complications. PPI use in EA can improve peptic and eosinophilic esophagitis but is ineffective on the other EA complications. Side effects of PPIs in EA are almost unknown.

Intestinal dysbiosis and inflammation in children with repaired esophageal atresia.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the intestinal microbiota and intestinal inflammation of children with esophageal atresia (EA) to matched healthy controls, and to investigate the relationship between these factors and clinical outcomes. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 35 children with EA and 35 matched healthy controls (HC) from a single tertiary pediatric hospital in Australia was conducted. Demographic and dietary data were collected using surveys. Stool samples were analyzed using 16S rRNA sequencing, and fecal calprotectin measurements were used to measure intestinal inflammation. Comparisons were made between the groups, and correlations between the microbiota and clinical factors were investigated in the EA cohort. RESULTS: Compared to HC, children with EA had similar alpha diversity, but beta diversity analysis revealed clustering of EA and HC cohorts. Children with EA had a significantly higher relative abundance of the order Lactobacillales, and a lower abundance of the genus uncultured Bacteroidales S24-7. Fecal calprotectin was significantly higher in children with EA compared to HC. In the EA cohort, children taking proton pump inhibitors (PPI's) had lower alpha diversity and higher calprotectin levels compared to those not taking PPI's. There was a negative correlation between calprotectin and length/height-for-age z scores, and children with higher calprotectin levels had a greater burden of gastrointestinal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Children with EA have an altered intestinal microbiota compared to HC, which is likely related to PPI use, and may be impacting on growth and quality of life. It is important to rationalize PPI use in this cohort.

Proton pump inhibitors, antibiotics, and atopy increase the risk of eosinophilic esophagitis in children with esophageal atresia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether proton pump inhibitor (PPI) exposure is associated with an increased risk of developing eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in children with esophageal atresia (EA). STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of children with EA from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2020 was undertaken at Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick. Children with EA and EoE (cases) were matched (1:2) to children with only EA (controls) to compare PPI exposure. Other early-life factors such as infantile antibiotic exposure and personal or family history of atopy were also analyzed using simple and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 184 children with EA, 46 (25%) developed EoE during this period. Thirty-eight EoE participants were matched to 76 controls. Children with EoE and EA received PPI for significantly higher durations (p = .018) and at significantly higher cumulative doses (p = .017) than controls. Food allergy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 7.317; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.244-23.742), family history of atopy (aOR, 3.504; 95% CI, 1.268-9.682), and infantile antibiotic exposure (aOR, 1.040; 95% CI, 1.006-1.075) were also significantly associated with an increased risk of developing EoE in the EA cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged duration and high cumulative dose of PPI exposure were significantly associated with subsequent EoE development in children with EA. Food allergy, family history of atopy, and infantile antibiotic exposure in EA were also significantly associated with an increased risk of EoE development.

Birth weight and thoracoscopic approach for patients with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula-a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyze the results, feasibility and safety of the thoracoscopic approach for patients with esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) depending on the patient's birth weight. METHODS: The study involved only type C and D EA/TEF. Among the analyzed parameters were the patients' characteristics, surgical treatment and post-operative complications: early mortality, anastomosis leakage, anastomosis strictures, chylothorax, TEF recurrence, and the need for fundoplication or gastrostomy. RESULTS: 145 consecutive newborns underwent thoracoscopic EA with TEF repair. They were divided into three groups-A (N = 12 with a birth weight < 1500 g), B (N = 23 with a birth weight ≥ 1500 g but < 2000 g), and C-control group (N = 110 with a birth weight ≥ 2000 g). Primary one-stage anastomosis was performed in 11/12 (91.7%) patients-group A, 19/23 (82.6%)-group B and 110 (100%)-group C. Early mortality was 3/12 (25%)-group A, 2/23 (8.7%)-group B, and 2/110 (1.8%)-group C and was not directly related to the surgical repair. There were no significant differences in operative time and the following complications: anastomotic leakage, recurrent TEF, esophageal strictures, and chylothorax. There were no conversions to an open surgery. Fundoplication was required in 0%-group A, 4/21 (19.0%)-group B, and 2/108 (1.9%)-group C survivors. Gastrostomy was performed in 1/9 (11.1%)-group A, 3/21 (14.3%)-group B and 0%-group C. CONCLUSION: In an experienced surgeon's hands, even in the smallest newborns, the thoracoscopic approach may be safe, feasible, and worthy of consideration. Birth weight seems to be not a direct contraindication to the thoracoscopic approach.

A case of antenatally undiagnosed laryngeal atresia with tracheo-esophageal fistula with airway obstruction at birth and its management.

Laryngeal atresia is a rare congenital anomaly that is usually diagnosed by antenatal ultrasound, however, if undiagnosed presents with desaturation after birth. A term neonate presented with airway obstruction after birth with multiple failed attempts at intubation and was rescued by proseal laryngeal mask airway (LMA). An esophagoscopy using an Ambuscope utilizing a modified connector assembly revealed an opening on the anterior wall of the esophagus with no esophageal atresia, leading to a diagnosis of H-type tracheo-esophageal fistula (TEF) with laryngeal atresia. The ability to ventilate the neonate via LMA with an absent glottic opening raised the possibility of TEF.

Balloon dilatation for congenital esophageal stenosis associated with esophageal atresia.

PURPOSE: Congenital esophageal stenosis (CES) associated with esophageal atresia (EA) is rare, and no standard treatment has been established. We reviewed cases of EA-associated CES to assess the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes, especially the feasibility of endoscopic dilatation. METHODS: We retrospectively examined patients with EA-associated CES. We also compared treatment outcomes of EA-associated CES with those of EA patients without CES who developed postoperative anastomotic stricture. RESULTS: Among 44 patients with EA, ten had CES (23%). Postoperative complications were not significantly different between EA patients with CES and those without CES but with anastomotic stricture. All CES patients underwent balloon dilatation as initial treatment. Eight of nine patients (89%) were successfully treated by dilatation only, and one patient underwent surgical resection. The median number of balloon dilatations for CES was five (2-17), which was higher than that for anastomotic stricture in patients without CES (p = 0.012). Esophageal perforation occurred in five patients with CES (5/9, 56%) after dilatation, but all perforations were successfully managed conservatively with an uneventful post-dilatation course. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-three percent of patients with EA had CES. Although balloon dilatation for EA-associated CES required multiple treatments and carried a risk of perforation, balloon dilatation showed an 89% success rate and all perforations could be managed conservatively.

Analysis of gap length as a predictor of surgical outcomes in esophageal atresia with distal fistula: a single center experience.

PURPOSE: Long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) is still a challenge for pediatric surgery. No consensus exists as to what constitutes a long gap, and few studies have investigated the maximum gap length safely repairable by primary anastomosis. Based on surgical outcomes at a single institution, we aimed to determine the gap length in LGEA with a high risk of complications. METHODS: The medical records of 51, consecutive patients with esophageal atresia (EA) with primary repair in the early neonatal period between 2001 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Three, major complications were found in the surgical outcomes: (1) anastomotic leakage, (2) esophageal stricture requiring dilatation, and (3) GERD requiring fundoplication. The predictive power of the postsurgical complications was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis, and the area under the curve (AUC) and the cutoff value with a specificity of > 90% were calculated. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (31.4%) experienced a complication. The AUC of gap length was0.90 (p < 0.001), and the gap length cutoff value was ≥ 2.0 cm for predicting any complication (sensitivity: 62.5%, specificity: 91.4%). CONCLUSION: A gap length ≥ 2.0 cm was considered as defining LGEA and was associated with an extremely high complication rate after primary repair.

Thoracoscopic primary repair is useful for esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula in neonates with low body weight.

PURPOSE: The surgical indication of thoracoscopic primary repair for esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula is under debate. The current study aimed to investigate the outcome of thoracoscopic primary repair for esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula in patients weighing < 2000 g and those who underwent emergency surgery at the age of 0 day. METHODS: The surgical outcomes were compared between patients weighing < 2000 g and those weighing > 2000 g at surgery and between patients who underwent surgery at the age of 0 day and those who underwent surgery at age ≥ 1 day. RESULTS: In total, 43 patients underwent thoracoscopic primary repair for esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula. The surgical outcomes according to body weight were similar. Patients who underwent surgery at the age of 0 day were more likely to develop anastomotic leakage than those who underwent surgery at the age of ≥ 1 day (2 vs. 0 case, p = 0.02). Anastomotic leakage was treated with conservative therapy. CONCLUSION: Thoracoscopic primary repair is safe and useful for esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula even in newborns weighing < 2000 g. However, emergency surgery at the age of 0 day should be cautiously performed due to the risk of anastomotic leakage.

Anastomotic leaks and the relationship with anastomotic strictures after esophageal atresia surgery; effects of patient characteristics.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the link between anastomotic leaks (AL) and anastomotic strictures (AS) after esophageal atresia surgery and the influence of patient demographics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical data of neonates who underwent surgical repair for esophageal atresia were retrospectively reviewed. The results of AL treatment and the relationship with AS, also the effects of patient characteristics were examined with logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Primary repair was performed on 122 of 125 patients who underwent surgery for esophageal atresia. AL occurred in 25 patients and 21 were treated non-operatively. While 4 patients were re-operated, AL recurred in 3 and led to the death of one. There was no correlation between the development of AL and sex or the presence of additional anomalies. The gestational age and birth weight of patients with AL were significantly higher than those of patients without. AS developed in 45 patients. The mean gestational age was significantly higher in patients who developed AS (p < .001). While the development of AS was significantly higher in patients with AL (p = .001), the number of dilatation sessions needed was also significantly higher in these patients (p = .026). Complications related to anastomosis were less common in patients whose gestational age was ≤33 weeks. CONCLUSION: Non-operative treatment remains effective for AL after esophageal atresia surgery. AL increases the risk of developing AS and significantly increases the number of dilatation sessions needed. Anastomotic complications are less common in patients with lower gestational age.NOVEL ASPECTSGestational age and birth weight were found to be significantly higher in patients with anastomotic leaks than in those without and fewer anastomotic complications were encountered in patients whose gestational age was ≤ 33 weeks.Anastomotic stricture development was significantly higher in patients with anastomotic leaks and the number of dilatation sessions needed for treatment was also significantly higher in these patients.

Tracheoesophageal Fistula With Esophageal Atresia: A Case Series.

Tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) with or without esophageal atresia (EA) results from maldevelopment of the trachea and esophagus during maturation of the primitive foregut. EA/TEF commonly presents shortly after birth because of increased oral secretions and the inability to advance a nasogastric or orogastric tube to the proper depth. Given that prenatal diagnosis is uncommon and early intervention is important to reduce morbidity and mortality risk, early recognition and diagnosis are imperative. We present a case series of two neonates diagnosed with EA/TEF, type "C" and type "E," born at low-acuity centers, who required transport to a tertiary center for surgical support. The pathophysiology as well as types of TEFs, symptomology, stabilization goals, corrective treatment, and long-term implications will be examined. Finally, the educational needs of parents and caregivers will be discussed.

Management of Adults With Esophageal Atresia.

Esophageal atresia (EA) with or without trachea-esophageal fistula is relatively common congenital malformation with most patients living into adulthood. As a result, care of the adult patient with EA is becoming more common. Although surgical repair has changed EA from a fatal to a livable condition, the residual effects of the anomaly may lead to a lifetime of complications. These include effects related to the underlying deformity such as atonicity of the esophageal segment, fistula recurrence, and esophageal cancer to complications of the surgery including anastomotic stricture, gastroesophageal reflux, and coping with an organ transposition. This review discusses the occurrence and management of these conditions in adulthood and the role of an effective transition from pediatric to adult care to optimize adult care treatment.

Usefulness of routine early œsophagogram after primary repair of œsophageal atresia: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Advances in surgical and neonatal care have led to improved survival of patients with œsophageal atresia (OA) over time. Morbidity remains significant, with one-third of patients being affected by a postoperative complication. Several aspects of management are not consensual, such as the use of œsophagogram before starting oral feeding. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study, including all children with OA that underwent a primary anastomosis in the first days of life, between 2012 and 2018 in five French centers, to determine the usefulness of postoperative œsophagogram during the 10 days after early primary repair of OA to diagnose the anastomotic leak and congenital œsophageal stenosis. RESULTS: Among 225 included children, 90 (40%) had a routine œsophagogram and 25 (11%) had an anastomotic leak, clinically diagnosed before the scheduled œsophagogram in 24/25 (96%) children at median postoperative day 4. Ten patients had associated congenital œsophageal stenosis diagnosed on the œsophagogram in only 30% of cases. CONCLUSION: Early œsophagogram is rarely useful in the diagnosis of an anastomotic leak, which is clinically diagnosed before performing an œsophagogram in the majority of cases. The need for a postoperative œsophagogram should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. IMPACT: Early œsophagogram is not helpful in the diagnosis of an anastomotic leak in the majority of cases. An anastomotic leak is most often diagnosed clinically before performing an œsophagogram. Early postoperative œsophagogram could be helpful for the diagnosis of congenital œsophageal stenosis. However, dysphagia occurs later and early diagnosis of congenital œsophageal stenosis has no impact on the management and outcome of asymptomatic children. Indication of postoperative œsophagogram has to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Recent Advances in the Genetic Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management of Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula: A Review.

Infants born with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula, a complex congenital malformation occurring in 1/2500-4000 live births, may suffer threats to their cardiac, respiratory, and digestive health in addition to anomalies that may exist in the genitourinary and musculoskeletal systems. Optimal care for these patients throughout their lives is best achieved through a coordinated, multidisciplinary approach that our health care system is not always well-equipped to provide. This review, though not exhaustive, highlights the components of care that pertain to initial surgical reconstruction and subsequent diagnosis and management of the complications that are most frequently encountered. Authors from among the many specialties involved in the care of these patients summarize the current best practice with attention to the most recent advances. Assessment and improvement of quality of life and transition to adult specialists as children grow to adulthood is also reviewed.

Oral Viscous Budesonide in Children With Eosinophilic Esophagitis After Repaired Esophageal Atresia: A Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: A high prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been reported in children with repaired esophageal atresia (EA). Topical steroids proved to be an effective and safe therapy in EoE, although not approved in pediatrics. We report the results of the first clinical trial of oral viscous budesonide (OVB) performed in children with EoE after repaired esophageal atresia (EoE-EA). METHODS: This open-label, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial with randomized pharmacokinetic sampling, was conducted at the Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital between September 2019 and June 2021. EoE-EA patients received an age-banded dose of OVB twice daily for 12 weeks and were endoscopically evaluated. The primary endpoint was the rate of patients achieving histological remission. Secondary endpoints included clinical and endoscopic benefit after treatment, and safety assessments. RESULTS: Eight consecutive EA-EoE patients were enrolled (median age 9.1 years, interquartile range 5.5). Of these, 5 received 0.8 mg and 3 received 1.0 mg twice daily of OVB. Histological remission was obtained in all but 1 patient (87.5%). The clinical score showed significant improvement at the end of treatment in all patients. No endoscopic features of EoE were found after treatment. No treatment-emergent adverse event occurred. CONCLUSION: OVB is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated formulation of budesonide for use in pediatric patients with EoE-EA.

Feeding and Swallowing Characteristics of Children With Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to characterize feeding/swallowing difficulties in children with esophageal atresia and/or tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) and evaluate associations among feeding difficulties, pharyngeal dysphagia (PD), and other aerodigestive evaluation findings. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of feeding/swallowing characteristics of 44 patients with EA/TEF treated in the aerodigestive program of a single academic medical institution from 2010 to 2015. Demographics, comorbidities, presence and characteristics of feeding/swallowing difficulties, and results of relevant diagnostic tests [videofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSS), clinical feeding evaluations (CFEs), chest computerized tomography (CT) scans, pulmonary bronchoscopies, and upper GI (UGI)/esophagrams] were reviewed. RESULTS: Fifty percent of the cohort had PD and 88.6% had feeding difficulties. Across 118 encounters (87 VFSS and 31 CFEs), feeding difficulties suggestive of esophageal dysphagia were most frequently seen in children over 48 months and feeding difficulties suggestive of developmental feeding problems were most frequently seen in children from 24 to 48 months. Abnormal findings were present in 59.8% of VFSS, with aspiration (34.5%) and pharyngeal residue (26.4%) the most frequently observed signs of dysphagia. Abnormal UGI/esophagram findings were not associated with significantly increased risk of feeding difficulties during visits within 3 months (risk ratio, RR = 1.33). Presence of dysphagia was associated with increased risk for some abnormal CT findings (RR= 3.0 for airspace and 3.0 for bronchiectasis). CONCLUSIONS: Feeding/swallowing difficulties are common in EA/TEF, and types of feeding difficulties vary by patient age. The presence of abnormal findings on UGI/esophagram did not increase the risk of feeding complaints; however, the presence of dysphagia increased the risk of abnormal chest CT.

To assess the cell lines on esophagogastroduod enoscopies of children with feeding difficulty, esophageal fistula and asthma with histologic abnormality.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the cell lines seen on esophagogastoduodenoscopy (EGD) of children who have difficulties feeding, esophageal fistula, and asthma that has some histologic abnormalities.  This is a study that looked back at the medical records of 100 children whose cells had been surgically restored after being impacted by EA or TEF. A review of the instrumental tests that were carried out at our facility has been conducted in order to identify any lingering anatomic or functional abnormalities of the airways and gastrointestinal system that would explain the pulmonary clinical images. Due to neurodevelopmental sequelae and the existence of tracheostomies, only 26 sets of pre and post-bronchodilator spirometry data were available for children. 100 children cells with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula were included in the study. The average number of weeks spent in gestation was 37.01± 2.33, and the average weight of a newborn was 2614±77.69 grammes. Twenty percent of the children's cells exhibited a syndromic appearance, and the VACTERL connection was identified in seventeen percent of the patients. In all, 80% of the children cells in the sample reported having respiratory symptoms, with 85% of patients experiencing symptoms of the lower respiratory tract and 15% experiencing symptoms of the upper respiratory tract. It is common practice to attribute children's symptoms to reflux and esophageal anomalies, despite the presence of respiratory symptoms and aberrant findings discovered by flexible bronchoscopy and CT assessment.

Peri- and neonatal factors influencing mortality and morbidity 2 years after esophageal atresia primary repair: a single center retrospective study.

Long-term digestive, respiratory, and neurological morbidity is significant in children who have undergone surgery for esophageal atresia (EA), especially after staged repair for long-gap EA. Risk factors for morbidity after primary repair (non-long-gap populations) have been less documented. We investigated peri- and neonatal factors associated with unfavorable outcomes in children 2 years after primary esophageal anastomosis. This was a single-center retrospective study, based on neonatal, surgical, and pediatric records of children born between December 1, 2002, and December 31, 2018, and followed up to age 2 years. The primary endpoint was unfavorable outcome at 2 years of age, defined by death or survival with severe respiratory, digestive, or neurologic morbidity. Univariate analyses followed by logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the peri- and neonatal risk factors of unfavorable outcomes among survivors at discharge. A total of 150 neonates were included (mean birth weight 2520 ± 718 g, associated malformations 61%); at age 2, 45 (30%) had one or more severe morbidities and 11 had died during the neonatal stay and 2 after discharge (8.7% deaths). In multivariate analyses of the 139 survivors at discharge, duration of ventilatory support (invasive and non-invasive) for more than 8 days (OR 3.74; CI95% [1.68-8.60]; p = 0.001) and achievement of full oral feeding before hospital discharge (OR 0.20; CI95% [0.06-0.56]; p = 0.003) were independently associated with adverse outcome after adjustment for sex, preterm birth, associated heart defect, any surgical complication, and the occurrence of more than one nosocomial infections during the neonatal stay. CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative ventilation and feeding management strategies may represent an opportunity for quality-of-care improvement to positively impact long-term outcomes after primary esophageal atresia repair. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Children operated on for esophageal atresia experience long-term digestive, respiratory, and neurologic morbidity, especially after multiple-stage esophageal repair. • Exclusive oral feeding at discharge is associated with a decreased risk of medical complications in the first years of life, in studies including all types of esophageal atresia repair. Outcomes of children after primary repair (non-long gap populations) have been less documented. WHAT IS NEW: • In our retrospective cohort of children with one-stage esophageal atresia repair, ventilatory support for more than 8 days and inability to achieve full oral feeding before hospital discharge in the neonatal period were independently associated with adverse digestive, respiratory, and neurologic outcomes at 2 years in survivors. • Both these factors are potentially modifiable, representing an opportunity for quality-of-care improvement to positively impact long-term outcomes. These results might also help identify children at risk of unfavorable evolution, to customize a multi-disciplinary follow-up program.

Swallowing-related quality of life in children with oesophageal atresia: a national cohort study.

Swallowing and feeding disorders are a major concern for children with oesophageal atresia (OA) after primary or staged OA repair. Primary OA repair is associated with higher rates of short-term complications in preterm infants with very low birth weight (VLBW) or extreme low birth weight (ELBW). On the other hand, primary repair may have the benefit of early commencement of oral feedings. We hypothesize that also in the medium-term, swallowing-related quality of life is better after primary oesophageal repair. We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study on swallowing quality in a national cohort of former VLBW and ELBW children with OA, using the structured paediatric swallowing quality of life (pedSWAL-QOL) questionnaire. Results were correlated with surgical approach and baseline clinical data. Principal component analysis of pedSWAL-QOL domains was performed. In total, 44 complete data sets of 78 children were available. The mean age of children was 8.5 years (SD = 7.4), and 23 children (52%) had primary OA repair. The overall median pedSWAL-QOL score was 2 (IQR = 0-3), representing a high swallowing-related quality of life, independent of surgical technique (p = 0.086). Children with a history of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) (p = 0.002) and those with VACTERL association (p = 0.008) had significantly decreased enjoyment with eating. In addition, children with VACTERL association had problems to find suitable foods (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: In this national cohort of VLBW and ELBW preterm-born children with OA, swallowing-related quality of life is good, mostly independent of initial surgery. Children with OA and ICH or VACTERL association may require more intense support with feeding. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Dysphagia, resembling feeding and swallowing disorders, is common in children and adults with repaired oesophageal atresia. Nevertheless, dysphagia in children with oesophageal atresia decreases with age. • Parents of younger children suffer from increased anxiety and fear regarding eating and swallowing abilities of their children. WHAT IS NEW: • Swallowing-related quality of life in former preterm children with oesophageal atresia is good, independent of initial surgical approach (primary vs. staged repair), even in very low birth weight or extreme low birth weight infants. • Children suffering from VACTERL association or intracranial haemorrhage show decreased enjoyment with eating.

Systematic review of long term follow-up and transitional care in adolescents and adults with esophageal atresia - why is transitional care mandatory?

PURPOSE:  to review recent literature concerning long-term health issues and transitional care in esophageal atresia (EA) patients. PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science databases were screened for studies regarding EA patients aged more than or equal to 11 years, published between August 2014 and June 2022. Sixteen studies involving 830 patients were analyzed. Mean age was 27.4 years (range 11-63). EA subtype distribution was: type C (48.8%), A (9.5%), D (1.9%), E (0.5%) and B (0.2%). 55% underwent primary repair, 34.3% delayed repair, 10.5% esophageal substitution. Mean follow-up was 27.2 years (range 11-63). Long-term sequelae were: gastro-esophageal reflux (41.4%), dysphagia (27.6%), esophagitis (12.4%), Barrett esophagus (8.1%), anastomotic stricture (4.8%); persistent cough (8.7%), recurrent infections (4.3%) and chronic respiratory diseases (5.5%). Musculo-skeletal deformities were present in 36 out of 74 reported cases. Reduced weight and height were detected in 13.3% and 6% cases, respectively. Impaired quality of life was reported in 9% of patients; 9.6% had diagnosis or raised risk of mental disorders. 10.3% of adult patients had no care provider. Meta-analysis was conducted on 816 patients. Estimated prevalences are: GERD 42.4%, dysphagia 57.8%, Barrett esophagus 12.4%, respiratory diseases 33.3%, neurological sequelae 11.7%, underweight 19.6%. Heterogeneity was substantial (> 50%).   Conclusion: EA patients must continue follow-up beyond childhood, with a defined transitional-care path by a highly specialized multidisciplinary team due to the multiple long-term sequelae. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Survival rates of esophageal atresia patients is now more than 90% thanks to the improvements in surgical techniques and intensive care, therefore patients' needs throughout adolescence and adulthood must be taken into account. WHAT IS NEW: • This review, by summarizing recent literature concerning long term sequelae of esophageal atresia, may contribute to raise awareness on the importance of defining standardized protocols of transitional and adulthood care for esophageal atresia patients.

Prognosis and clinical issues of esophageal atresia in extremely low birth weight neonates: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal atresia (EA) in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) neonates is rare. This report aims to clarify EA's clinical courses and prognosis in ELBW neonates and the clinical issues of long-term survival cases. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted for 8 neonates diagnosed with esophageal atresia. Medical records of ELBW EA neonates treated at our institution were reviewed to assess patient demographics, clinical courses, and outcomes. Transferred patient data was obtained from their local physicians through questionnaires. RESULTS: EA in ELBW neonates were included in 8 of EA infants (7%). Fatal respiratory and cardiovascular complications of trisomy 18 and complications related to immaturity such as liver failure and pulmonary hypertension were associated with poor prognosis. During primary operations, gastrostomy and esophageal banding were performed together in 50% of the cases, while gastrostomy was performed alone in 25%. The esophageal anastomosis was not performed during any primary operation. All causes of death, except for 1 case, were due to non-surgical causes. A long-term survival case of 17 years postoperatively was included. CONCLUSION: Although ELBW EA has a poor prognosis, long-term survival is possible in some cases, so aggressive therapeutic intervention is considered essential. It is important to share information about the prognosis with parents and multidisciplinary specialists and to select an appropriate treatment strategy for each case.