ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Physiological and psychological factors have been found to influence esophageal symptom reporting. We aimed to evaluate which of these factors are associated with 3 reflux symptom severity outcomes (ie, Total Reflux, Heartburn, and Sleep Disturbance) through a traditional statistical and a complementary machine-learning approach. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients with refractory heartburn/regurgitation symptoms underwent standard 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring and completed questionnaires assessing past and current gastrointestinal and psychological health. In the traditional statistical approach, hierarchical general linear models assessed relationships of psychological and physiological variables (eg, total number of reflux episodes) with reflux severity scores. Mediation analyses further assessed pathways between relevant variables. In the machine-learning approach, all psychological and physiological variables were entered into 11 different models and cross-validated model performance was compared among the different models to select the best model. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-three participants (mean [SD] age, 48.5 [14.1] years; 60% were female) were included. General psychological functioning emerged as an important variable in the traditional statistical approach, as it was significantly associated with all 3 outcomes and mediated the relationship between childhood trauma and both Total Reflux and Heartburn Severity. In the machine-learning analyses, general psychological variables (eg, depressive symptoms) were most important for Total Reflux and Sleep Disturbance outcomes, and symptom-specific variables, like visceral anxiety, were more influential for Heartburn Severity. Physiological variables were not significant contributors to reflux symptom severity outcomes in our sample across reflux classifications and statistical methodology. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological processes, both general and symptom-specific, should be considered as another important factor within the multifactorial processes that impact reflux symptom severity reporting across the reflux spectrum.
Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux , Heartburn , Adult , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Heartburn/etiology , Heartburn/complications , Esophageal pH Monitoring/methods , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , VomitingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Wireless pH monitoring allows for a definitive GERD diagnosis, which is essential for optimal medical or surgical management of the patient. However, there is no guideline recommendation on whether prolonged pH testing (72 or 96 h) provides additional benefit when compared to the standard 48-h testing. We aimed to assess whether prolonged pH monitoring diagnoses more patients with GERD, as well as compare the DeMeester score to acid exposure time as diagnostic criteria for GERD. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive adult patients who underwent wireless esophageal pH monitoring between August 2018 and July 2021. The primary outcome was the additional diagnoses of GERD (predominant acid exposure pattern) in patients who underwent 48-h versus 96-h pH monitoring. Secondary outcomes included comparison of the DeMeester score to acid exposure time and internal agreement between the first and second 48-h blocks of a prolonged 96-h pH study. RESULTS: When comparing 48-h versus 96-h pH testing, the prolonged monitoring group was more likely to have a predominant reflux pattern and thus be diagnosed with definitive GERD by elevated DeMeester score (58.8% vs. 40.8%, p = 0.003) or acid exposure time > 6% (44.7% vs. 32.4%, p = 0.039). For patients who underwent prolonged testing, the results of monitoring beyond 48 h led to a clinically meaningful change in study interpretation in 24.8% of patients. The study data from Days 3 to 4 yielded only a 56.6% agreement with the first 2 days. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing extended pH monitoring, almost half were found to have an abnormal pH study after a normal study on Day 1. An additional 25% of patients had a change in study interpretation by extending the study beyond 48 h. Our findings suggest only 48 h of pH monitoring will miss a diagnosis of GERD in a clinically important number of patients.
Subject(s)
Esophageal pH Monitoring , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Humans , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Esophageal pH Monitoring/methods , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Time Factors , AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Multiple factors contribute to symptom generation and treatment response in proton-pump inhibitor non-responders (PPI-NRs). We aimed to test whether PPI-NRs with normal acid exposure have a higher degree of esophageal hypersensitivity and hypervigilance and can be identified using functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) topography at the time of endoscopy. METHODS: Data from PPI-NRs whom underwent endoscopy, FLIP and wireless 96-h pH-metry were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were grouped according to acid exposure time (AET) as (a) 0 days abnormal (AET > 6%), (b) 1-2 days abnormal, or (c) 3-4 days abnormal. The esophageal hypervigilance and anxiety scale (EHAS) score and other symptom scores were compared between groups. The discriminatory ability of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) distensibility index (DI) and max EGJ diameter in identifying patients with 0 days abnormal AET was tested via receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: EHAS score was 38.6 in the 0 days abnormal AET group, 30.4 in the 1-2 days abnormal AET group (p = 0.073 when compared to 0 days abnormal) and 28.2 in the 3-4 days abnormal AET group (p = 0.031 when compared to 0 days abnormal). Area-under-the-curve (AUC) for the DI in association with 0 days AET > 6% was 0.629. A DI of < 2.8 mm2/mmHg had a sensitivity of 83.3%, and negative predictive value of 88% in classifying patients with 0 days abnormal acid exposure (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: FLIP complements prolonged wireless pH-metry in distinguishing the subset of PPI-NRs with completely normal acid exposure and a higher burden of esophageal hypervigilance. Proper identification of patients along the functional heartburn spectrum can improve overall surgical outcomes.
Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux , Humans , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Esophageal pH Monitoring/methodsABSTRACT
Objective: To investigate the risk factors for the occurrence of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the aged, and to analyze the characteristics of patients with pneumonia. Methods: Patients who underwent 24-hour laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring from June 2020 to July 2022 and the positive patients of those who underwent 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring from March 2017 to July 2022 at the Second Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital were enrolled retrospectively. Positive results of 24-hour laryngopharyngeal reflux monitoring were in the laryngopharyngeal reflux group, and the negative results were in the non-laryngopharyngeal reflux group. Patients with pneumonia and simple gastroesophageal reflux disease were in the esophageal reflux pneumonia group, and patients with pneumonia and simple laryngopharyngeal reflux disease were in the laryngopharyngeal reflux pneumonia group. Patients' basic data, co-morbidities, drug use and relevant examination and test results were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the aged and its relationship with pneumonia. Results: A total of 80 patients with 24-hour laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring were enrolled finally, including 34 cases, all male, aged (73±12) years, in the laryngopharyngeal reflux group, and 46 cases [44 males, 2 females, aged (78±11) years] in the non-laryngopharyngeal reflux group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the risk factors of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the aged included age ≤70 years (OR=13.07, 95%CI: 2.53-67.68), body mass index (BMI) (OR=1.37, each additional 1 kg/m2, 95%CI: 1.03-1.83), use of antipsychotic drugs (OR=8.00, 95%CI: 1.40-45.73) and calcium channel blockers (OR=5.27, 95%CI: 1.13-24.53) (all P<0.05). The protective factors of the laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the aged included antacids (OR=0.19, 95%CI: 0.04-0.90, P=0.035). The incidence of pneumonia was higher in the laryngopharyngeal reflux group compared with the non-laryngopharyngeal reflux group [44.1% (15/34) vs 21.7% (10/46), P=0.033]. The esophageal reflux pneumonia group included 32 cases [31 males and 1 females, aged (84±12) years]. The laryngopharyngeal reflux pneumonia group included 15 cases [ 15 males, aged (79±11) years]. Compared to the patients in the laryngopharyngeal reflux pneumonia group, the patients in the esophageal reflux pneumonia group had a longer course of antibiotics [(27.7±27.0) vs (14.6±13.9) days, P=0.034], a higher frequency of seizure frequency [(4.3±3.0) vs (1.8±1.5) times/year, P<0.001] and a higher maximal body temperature [(38.2±0.9) vs (37.6±1.1) â, P=0.037]. Conclusions: The risk factors of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the aged included age ≤70 years, higher BMI, use of antipsychotic drugs and calcium channel blockers. The incidence of pneumonia in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease is higher, but the condition of pneumonia is milder.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Laryngopharyngeal Reflux , Female , Humans , Male , Laryngopharyngeal Reflux/diagnosis , Laryngopharyngeal Reflux/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Calcium Channel Blockers , Risk Factors , Esophageal pH Monitoring/methodsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) symptoms are very common in the general adult population. Dysphagia, heartburn, regurgitation and non-cardiac chest pain are the most common signs. The clinical approach in managing these symptoms starts with upper GI endoscopy in order to exclude inflammatory, neoplastic and fibrotic disorders that involve the esophagus. Upper GI endoscopy is mandatory especially when alarm signs exist. In patients with no structural abnormalities, physiological testing might aid to better understand the origin of the symptoms and to improve management.
Subject(s)
Esophageal pH Monitoring , Manometry , Humans , Manometry/methods , Esophageal pH Monitoring/methods , Esophagus/physiopathology , Adult , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Esophageal Diseases/diagnosis , Esophageal Diseases/physiopathology , Deglutition Disorders/diagnosis , Deglutition Disorders/physiopathology , Barium Sulfate/administration & dosageABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: High-resolution manometry (HRM) tools, like esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI), assess EGJ barrier function. GOALS: This study aimed to evaluate the relationships between manometric EGJ metrics with esophageal acid exposure. STUDY: We conducted a retrospective review of 284 patients who underwent HRM and ambulatory reflux testing between 11/2017-1/2020. EGJ-CI and total-EGJ-CI were manually calculated. Pathologic acid exposure was defined as pH < 4 with esophageal acid exposure time (EAET) exceeding 6.0%. Pearson's correlation, univariable and multivariable regression models were utilized to assess the relationships between pathologic acid exposure and EGJ parameters. Sensitivity and specificity thresholds for EGJ-CI and total EGJ-CI were optimized with ROC analyses. RESULTS: On univariable analysis, patients with pathologic acid exposure had increased odds of having lower mean basal LES pressures, EGJ-CI, and total EGJ-CI than patients without pathologic acid exposure. On multivariable analysis, age, EGJ-CI and mean DCI were significant predictors of pathologic acid exposure. There were significant, though weak, correlations between EAET and EGJ-CI and total EGJ-CI (r = - 0.18, - 0.19, p < 0.01, respectively). An EGJ-CI cutoff of 44.16 as a predictor for pathologic acid exposure had a sensitivity of 46% and specificity of 42% (AUC 0.60). Total EGJ-CI cutoff of 11,461.3 for pathologic acid exposure had a sensitivity of 44% and a specificity of 43% (AUC 0.62). CONCLUSION: EGJ-CI can independently predict pathologic acid exposure. However, the poor correlation between EGJ-CI and acid exposure, as well as the low sensitivity and specificity of calculated thresholds, indicate that mechanisms other than EGJ barrier function may impact acid exposure.
Subject(s)
Esophageal pH Monitoring , Esophagogastric Junction , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Manometry , Humans , Gastroesophageal Reflux/physiopathology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Esophagogastric Junction/physiopathology , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Male , Manometry/methods , Female , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Esophageal pH Monitoring/methods , Adult , Sensitivity and Specificity , Aged , ROC Curve , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Predictive Value of TestsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of the KidZ Health Castle formula (KHC-F) to determine the correct probe position of a multichannel intraluminal impedance pH. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed on 222 children between 1 month and 18 years of age undergoing multichannel intraluminal impedance pH. The primary outcome was the comparison of the pH sensor location determined by the KHC-F with the radiological target position. The margin of error was defined as 1 cm from the target position. Performance of the KHC-F and existing formulas was determined via the percentage with a correct position, mean error, 95% limits of agreement (Bland-Altman plots), and Spearman correlation. A post hoc analysis was performed with an updated KHC-F v2, subtracting -0.5 cm from the KHC-F. RESULTS: Positioning with KHC-F was correct in two-thirds of the participants, with a very strong correlation (ρ = 0.91) with the target position. Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between KHC-F and target position (mean error of -0.44 cm, lower limit -3.2 cm, upper limit 2.3 cm). A post hoc analysis with the KHC-F v2 showed a correct positioning in 74% of patients. Comparison with other formulas showed a stronger performance of KHC-F and KHC-F v2 on correct positioning, mean error, and 95% limits of agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The KHC-F leads to reliable results. KHC-F v2 outperforms all other existing formulas in children, thereby reducing the need for repositioning and the amount of x-ray exposure. The age distribution of the sample may be a limitation, as well as the retrospective nature of the study.
Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux , Humans , Child , Esophageal pH Monitoring/methods , Retrospective Studies , Electric Impedance , Reproducibility of Results , Hydrogen-Ion ConcentrationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: As living standards improve, more and more people are becoming overweight or obese, which has led to a gradual increase in the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring is a technique widely used in the clinical diagnosis of GERD. Commonly used traditional impedance parameters include acid exposure time, number of reflux episodes, symptom association probability, and symptom index. Recently, mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) and post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) index have been proposed as novel impedance parameters to evaluate esophageal mucosal integrity and esophageal chemical clearance, respectively. It was also pointed out that the MNBI and PSPW index can improve the diagnostic value of impedance pH monitoring and predict the treatment outcome of GERD. SUMMARY: MNBI and PSPW index are objective and reliable novel impedance parameters with high applicability and reproducibility, which are able to improve the diagnostic yield of impedance pH monitoring and predict treatment outcomes in GERD patients. KEY MESSAGES: In this paper, we mainly review the research progress of the MNBI and the PSPW index in the diagnosis and treatment of GERD.
Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux , Humans , Electric Impedance , Reproducibility of Results , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Esophageal pH Monitoring/methodsABSTRACT
In our present clinical paradigm, patient symptoms and presentation in the setting of traditional findings from endoscopy (erosive esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, reflux-mediated stenosis), esophageal high-resolution manometry, and/or ambulatory reflux monitoring (distal esophageal acid exposure time, numbers of reflux events, reflux-symptom association) guide the care of patients with suspected GERD. However, novel metrics and techniques acquired from or performed at endoscopy, manometry, or pH-impedance monitoring, beyond conventional evaluation, are of great interest to the gastroenterology community given the frequent (and sometimes challenging) presentation of suspected GERD. These novel and evolving diagnostic approaches have the potential to enhance the evaluation of these patients and optimize their management. In this invited review, we discuss the present evidence and potential clinical utility of selected GERD metrics and techniques of interest at endoscopy (dilated intercellular spaces, mucosal impedance), manometry (contractile integral, impedance analysis, straight leg raise, multiple rapid swallow maneuvers), and reflux monitoring (mean nocturnal baseline impedance, post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave indices), and how these tools may be most optimally adopted and utilized for clinical care (Fig. 1).
Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus , Esophagitis , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Humans , Esophageal pH Monitoring/methods , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis , Electric Impedance , ManometryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Many children respond to medical treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, some may require invasive intervention for refractory disease. Due to the lack of prognostic tools in children, this study aimed to develop a predictive model for refractory GERD. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed in children with symptoms of GERD at a university hospital. Refractory GERD was defined as an unresponsive disease after optimal treatment with medication for >8 weeks. The predictive model was constructed based on clinical features and 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring results. RESULTS: A total of 205 children were included with a median (IQR) age of 0.6 (0.3, 2.0) years. Over half of the patients (59.5%) had motor disabilities. Forty-four children (21.5%) were diagnosed with refractory GERD and subsequently underwent fundoplication. Multivariable analysis suggested that the refractory disease was associated with motor disabilities (OR: 5.35; 95% CI: 2.06-13.91), recurrent aspiration pneumonia (OR: 2.78; 95% CI: 1.24-6.26), prematurity with an onset of GERD at a post-conceptual age <40 weeks (OR: 6.76; 95% CI: 1.96-23.33), and abnormal total reflux episodes according to age (OR: 2.78; 95% CI: 1.24-6.19), but not the acid exposure time or symptom association analysis. The predictive model for refractory GERD based on associated factors revealed an area under the ROC curve of 76.8% (95% CI: 69.2%-84.3%) with a sensitivity of 77.3% and a specificity of 64% when applying a cutoff score of ≥2.5. CONCLUSIONS: The predictive model, using clinical features and MII-pH, may be an additional tool to predict refractory GERD in young children.
Subject(s)
Esophageal pH Monitoring , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Humans , Child , Child, Preschool , Infant , Esophageal pH Monitoring/methods , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Gastroesophageal Reflux/therapy , Fundoplication/methods , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To validate Lyon Consensus criteria for diagnosing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) by reflux monitoring. DESIGN: Manual review of impedance-pH tracings from patients with proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-dependent heartburn, evaluated off PPI. Acid exposure time (AET) thresholds defined by the Lyon Consensus and impedance parameters were investigated, namely, total refluxes (TRs), postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) index and mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI). RESULTS: The study included 488 patients, 178 (36%) with normal (<4%) AET, 89 (18%) with inconclusive (4%-6%) AET and 221 (45%) with abnormal (>6%) AET, alongside with 70 healthy controls. At receiver operating characteristic analysis, area under curve was 0.89, 0.95 and 0.89 for TRs, PSPW index and MNBI, respectively, and threshold values were 40, 50% and 2000 Ω; the 4% physiological AET threshold defined by the Lyon Consensus showed 100% specificity but 63% sensitivity. The thresholds defined for impedance parameters were validated against AET by means of ordered logistic regression, being in concordance with the 4% AET threshold (OR 2.5 for TRs, 18.9 for PSPW index and 5.7 for MNBI). TRs positivity and concordant PSPW index/MNBI positivity were found in 80%-90% of patients in the abnormal AET group, in 73%-74% of cases in the inconclusive AET group and in 28%-40% of cases in the group with normal AET. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show the overall validity of the Lyon Consensus approach to GORD diagnosis. Adding evaluation of impedance parameters, namely, TRs, PSPW index and MNBI to AET appraisal, substantially improves the diagnostic yield of reflux monitoring.
Subject(s)
Esophageal pH Monitoring , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Humans , Consensus , Electric Impedance , Esophageal pH Monitoring/methods , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic useABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of spontaneous sleep positions on the occurrence of nocturnal gastroesophageal reflux. METHODS: In patients referred for ambulatory pH-impedance reflux monitoring, the concurrent sleep position was measured using a sleep position measurement device (measuring left, right, supine, and prone positions). RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were included. We observed a significantly shorter acid exposure time in the left (median 0.0%, P25-P75, 0.0%-3.0%), compared with the right lateral position (median 1.2%, 0.0%-7.5%, P = 0.022) and the supine position (median 0.6%, 0.00%-8.3%, P = 0.022). The esophageal acid clearance time was significantly shorter in the left lateral decubitus position (median 35 seconds, 16-115 seconds), compared with the supine (median 76 seconds, 22-257 seconds, P = 0.030) and right lateral positions (median 90 seconds, 26-250 seconds, P = 0.002). DISCUSSION: The left lateral decubitus position is associated with significantly shorter nocturnal esophageal acid exposure time and faster esophageal acid clearance compared with the supine and right lateral decubitus positions (see visual abstract).
Subject(s)
Esophagus/metabolism , Gastroesophageal Reflux/physiopathology , Posture/physiology , Sleep/physiology , Electric Impedance , Esophageal pH Monitoring/methods , Esophagus/physiopathology , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/metabolism , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Male , Middle Aged , PolysomnographyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the characteristics of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and the association between LPR and allergic rhinitis (AR). METHODS: In this prospective case-control study, a total of 102 patients with suspected LPR who visited the Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, between June 2019 and June 2021 were consecutively included. They were divided into the LPR-positive group and the LPR-negative group according to 24-h Dx-pH monitoring. The influencing factors of LPR, including the scores for AR (SFAR) and AR prevalence, were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The total SFAR and scores in items 1, 3, 4, and 5 of the LPR-positive group were significantly higher than those of the LPR-negative group (p < 0.05). The prevalence of AR in the LPR-positive group was 60%, which was significantly higher than that in the LPR-negative group (36.54%) (p < 0.05). After excluding confounding factors, AR was positively correlated with the incidence of LPR, and the incidence of LPR with AR was 2.372 times that of non-AR. Receiver operating characteristic curve results show that AR has the highest predictive value for LPR, and the area of AR under the curve is was 0.617. CONCLUSIONS: The SFAR and incidence of AR are high in patients with positive LPR, and AR may be a risk factor for LPR. The results of this study may deepen our understanding of the occurrence of LPR.
Subject(s)
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux , Rhinitis, Allergic , Case-Control Studies , Esophageal pH Monitoring/methods , Hospitals , Humans , Laryngopharyngeal Reflux/diagnosis , Laryngopharyngeal Reflux/epidemiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Rome IV experts have proposed that gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) should be diagnosed only in patients with abnormal esophageal acid exposure, and that reflux hypersensitivity (RH) and functional heartburn (FH) both should be considered functional conditions separate from GERD. Although past and recent evidence support that FH can be completely distinguished from GERD, the concept that RH is not GERD is highly questionable. This review attempts to provide current data on these issues. RECENT FINDINGS: Many recent investigations have provided new data on the different pathophysiological features characterizing RH and FH. Major differences have emerged from analyses of impedance-pH monitoring studies using the novel impedance metrics of baseline impedance (an index of mucosal integrity) and the rate of postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic waves (a reflection of the integrity of esophageal chemical clearance). SUMMARY: The better ability to interpret impedance-pH tracings together with earlier data on the different prevalence of microscopic esophagitis in RH and FH patients, and recent studies documenting poor therapeutic efficacy of pain modulators and good results of antireflux surgery for RH support recategorization of RH within the GERD world. Further research is needed to correctly phenotype patients who have heartburn without mucosal breaks, and to guide their effective management.
Subject(s)
Esophageal Diseases , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Esophageal pH Monitoring/methods , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Heartburn/diagnosis , Heartburn/drug therapy , Heartburn/etiology , HumansABSTRACT
Esophageal ambulatory reflux monitoring is the current gold standard for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In order to facilitate standardized procedure and improve diagnostic accuracy, clinical guidelines for ambulatory esophageal reflux monitoring were developed based on thorough literature search and working group conference by experts in gastrointestinal motility. Indications, contraindications, methodology, and reporting of ambulatory esophageal reflux monitoring were discussed in these clinical guidelines.
Subject(s)
Esophagitis, Peptic , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Adult , China , Esophageal pH Monitoring/methods , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Humans , Manometry/methods , Practice Guidelines as TopicABSTRACT
A device that can easily measure electrical impedance might be a helpful tool for investigating the pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The first aim of this study was to validate our newly developed bioelectrical admittance measurement (BAM) through in vitro experimentation. The second aim was to investigate whether evaluation of BAM by this measurement differed between patients with heartburn according to their response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Caco-2 cell monolayers and three-dimensional tissues were examined by BAM using a frequency response analyzer. BAM was also used to measure the impedance through cell layers. Subsequently, BAM was performed during endoscopy in 41 patients experiencing heartburn without esophageal mucosal breaks. After 2-wk administration of 20-mg rabeprazole twice daily, patient responses to PPI were classified as "good" or "poor" according to their clinical course. In each patient, histological alterations and gene expression levels of inflammation mediators and tight junction proteins were evaluated. Impedance profiles indicated that monolayer Caco-2 cells on top of eight-layered normal human dermal fibroblasts had the highest magnitude of impedance over the range of frequencies. In vivo results revealed that patients with good responses to PPI displayed significantly higher admittance. Severity of low-grade inflammation was significantly associated with esophageal wall admittance. Moreover, esophageal wall admittance may be more closely related to basal zone hyperplasia than dilatation of intercellular spaces. Thus, BAM may be able to detect abnormalities in the subepithelial layer of the esophagus.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Bioelectrical admittance measurement is a new method to evaluate esophageal mucosal permeability vertically during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Measurement of low-grade inflammation of the esophageal mucosa with electrical conductivity shows promise in assessing proton pump inhibitor responsiveness in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. As various gastrointestinal diseases are associated with changes in mucosal permeability, bioelectrical admittance measurement is expected to be clinically applied to therapeutic decision-making for these diseases in the future.
Subject(s)
Electric Conductivity , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Inflammation/metabolism , Rabeprazole/pharmacology , Animals , Caco-2 Cells/cytology , Esophageal Mucosa/drug effects , Esophageal Mucosa/physiopathology , Esophageal pH Monitoring/methods , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/physiopathology , Humans , Inflammation/classification , Inflammation/diagnosis , Male , Mice , Middle Aged , Mucous Membrane/physiopathology , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the findings of both multichannel intraluminal impedance with pH (MII-pH) and endoscopy/histopathology in children with esophageal atresia at age 1 year, according to current recommendations for the evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in esophageal atresia. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed both MII-pH and endoscopy/histopathology performed in 1-year-old children with esophageal atresia who were followed up in accordance with international recommendations. Demographic data and clinical characteristics were also reviewed to investigate factors associated with abnormal GERD investigations. RESULTS: In our study cohort of 48 children with esophageal atresia, microscopic esophagitis was found in 33 (69%) and pathological esophageal acid exposure on MII-pH was detected in 12 (25%). Among baseline variables, only the presence of long-gap esophageal atresia was associated with abnormal MII-pH. Distal baseline impedance was significantly lower in patients with microscopic esophagitis, and it showed a very good diagnostic performance in predicting histological changes. CONCLUSIONS: Histological esophagitis is highly prevalent at 1 year after esophageal atresia repair, but our results do not support a definitive causative role of acid-induced GERD. Instead, they support the hypothesis that chronic stasis in the dysmotile esophagus might lead to histological changes. MII-pH may be a helpful tool in selecting patients who need closer endoscopic surveillance and/or benefit from acid suppression.
Subject(s)
Esophageal Atresia/surgery , Esophagoplasty/adverse effects , Esophagus/physiopathology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications , Adolescent , Child , Electric Impedance , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Esophageal pH Monitoring/methods , Esophagus/metabolism , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gastroesophageal Reflux/etiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Manometry , Retrospective Studies , Time FactorsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Increased nonacid reflux is diagnosed in a subgroup of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease who often present with reflux symptoms refractory to proton-pump inhibitor therapy. Despite the prevalence of this condition, the management approach for patients with increased nonacid reflux can often be varied and unclear. AIMS: Our primary aim was to investigate physician management patterns for patients who had received a diagnosis of increased nonacid reflux on impedance-pH studies. METHODS: Reflux studies in patients with increased nonacid reflux per Lyon Consensus criteria and management approaches were retrospectively reviewed. Reflux symptom survey, manometry findings, reflux symptom association (RSA) on reflux testing, immediate posttesting management information, and managing provider information were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 43 subjects in total were analyzed. Management plan after a diagnosis of increased nonacid reflux was decided by a gastroenterologist in over 95% of cases and varied greatly with no changes being the most common. Even among subjects with + RSA on reflux monitoring, no change in management was the most common action, although this occurred much less frequently compared to subjects with - RSA (28.6% vs. 78.6%, p < 0.01). When change in therapy occurred, medical treatment with baclofen was the most common choice (21.4%). Other management changes included medications for visceral hypersensitivity and antireflux surgery, although these changes occurred rarely. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormally increased nonacid reflux is frequently encountered on impedance-pH studies; however, management decisions vary significantly among gastroenterologists. When treatment change is implemented, they are variable and can include lifestyle modifications, medication trials, or antireflux surgery. Future development of standardized management algorithms for increased nonacid reflux is needed.
Subject(s)
Electric Impedance , Esophageal pH Monitoring/methods , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Manometry , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Symptom Assessment , Baclofen/therapeutic use , Clinical Decision-Making , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Gastroesophageal Reflux/epidemiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/physiopathology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/therapy , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration/drug effects , Male , Manometry/methods , Manometry/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Muscle Relaxants, Central/therapeutic use , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Symptom Assessment/methods , Symptom Assessment/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The main aim of the study was to assess the relationship between leptin, ghrelin, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) blood levels and gastric motility in children with obesity compared to healthy children. Secondary aims were to assess the possible association between these hormones and obesity, reflux impedance parameters, reflux symptoms, other GI disorders, and quality-of-life scores within the same groups. METHODS: Children with obesity plus GERD symptoms and 2 control groups of children with obesity without GERD and healthy lean children aged 4-17 years underwent an auxological evaluation, an assessment of gastro-intestinal symptoms and quality of life, hormonal dosages, and an evaluation of gastric emptying time (GET) through 13C-octanoic acid breath test. RESULTS: No significant association was found between hormones and gastric motility. Leptin and ghrelin levels were significantly associated with obesity parameters. No significant differences were found between GET and hormones of the patients with obesity, either with or without GERD. CONCLUSION: Although we found an association between auxological parameters and both leptin and ghrelin levels, this association did not imply an effect on the upper GI motility. Therefore, our hypothesis that alterations of these hormones in children with obesity could affect gastric emptying, triggering GERD, was not supported by our data.
Subject(s)
Esophageal pH Monitoring , Gastric Emptying/physiology , Ghrelin/blood , Glucagon-Like Peptide 1/blood , Insulin-Like Growth Factor I/analysis , Leptin/blood , Obesity , Quality of Life , Child , Correlation of Data , Esophageal pH Monitoring/methods , Esophageal pH Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Gastroesophageal Reflux/etiology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Diseases/etiology , Humans , Male , Obesity/blood , Obesity/diagnosis , Obesity/physiopathology , Obesity/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND The multiple rapid swallows (MRS) test is used to assess esophageal contraction reserve. In this study, we characterized the expression of the MRS test in patients with reflux burden and other symptomatic phenotypes with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (rGERD). MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with rGERD who underwent high-resolution manometry (HRM) and esophageal pH-impedance monitoring (EIM) between September 2018 and January 2020 were retrospectively studied. RESULTS We enrolled 151 patients and divided them into 4 phenotypes according to the results of EIM. In phenotype 1, the MRS distal contractile integral (DCI) was significantly positively correlated with acid-liquid reflux episodes. In phenotype 2, lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LES) length was significantly positively correlated with MRS DCI, and MRS/single-swallow (SS) DCI ratio. In phenotype 3, MRS DCI was negatively correlated with the DeMeester score, acid exposure time (AET), upright AET, long-term acid reflux episodes, acid-mixed reflux episodes, recumbent acid reflux episodes, and total acid reflux episodes. There was a significant negative correlation between MRS/SS DCI and recumbent acid reflux episodes. In phenotype 4, nonacid-liquid episodes and recumbent nonacid reflux episodes were significantly higher in the abnormal MRS group. However, acid-gas episodes, weakly acid-gas episodes, and upright gas reflux episodes were higher in the normal MRS group than in the abnormal MRS group. CONCLUSIONS Esophageal contraction reserve is heterogeneous within the reflux burden and symptomatic phenotypes of patients with rGERD.