Chasing a rarity: a retrospective single-center evaluation of prognostic factors in primary gliosarcoma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Primary gliosarcoma (GS) is a rare variant of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma multiforme. We performed a single-center analysis to identify prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the records of 26 patients newly diagnosed with primary WHO grade IV GS. Factors of interest were clinical and treatment data, as well as molecular markers, time to recurrence, and time to death. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 9 months (range 5-21 months). Gross total resection did not lead to improved survival, most likely due to the relatively small sample size. Low symptom burden at the time of diagnosis was associated with longer PFS (P = 0.023) and OS (P = 0.018). Median OS in the entire cohort was 12 months. Neither MGMT promoter hypermethylation nor adjuvant temozolomide therapy influenced survival, consistent with some previous reports. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, patients exhibiting low symptom burden at diagnosis showed improved survival. None of the other factors analyzed were associated with an altered outcome.

Primary versus secondary gliosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Gliosarcomas are extremely rare malignant brain tumors, which can be classified as primary gliosarcoma (PGS) if the tumors arise de novo or secondary gliosarcoma (SGS) in patients who had previously been treated for glioblastoma. Given their rarity, it is unclear if PGS is clinically and genetically different from SGS. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the clinicopathological features, prognostic survivals, and molecular profiles of these rare tumors. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Web of Science for relevant studies. Odds ratio (OR), hazard ratio (HR), and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using the random-effect model. RESULTS: We included eight studies with 239 PGS and 79 SGS for meta-analyses. Compared to PGS, SGS occurred at a younger age and had lower rates of gross total resection and radiation therapy. Bevacizumab was more commonly administered in SGS. SGS patients had a significantly worse PFS (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.40-0.89) and OS (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.31-0.68) in comparison to PGS. The incidences of EGFR mutation, IDH mutation, and MGMT methylation were not statistically different between PGS and SGS. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that PGS and SGS had distinct clinicopathological profiles and prognoses but shared similar genetic profiles. This study facilitates our understanding of how these two malignant brain tumors behave clinically, but future studies will be required to elucidate the genetic pathways of PGS and SGS.

Survival outcomes associated with MGMT promoter methylation and temozolomide in gliosarcoma patients.

PURPOSE: Gliosarcoma is an uncommon glioblastoma subtype, for which MGMT promoter methylation's relationship with response to temozolomide chemotherapy is unclear. We therefore examined this question using a national cohort. METHODS:  The National Cancer Database was queried for patients histopathologically diagnosed with gliosarcoma between 2010 and 2019. The associations between MGMT promoter methylation, first-line single-agent chemotherapy-presumed to be temozolomide herein-and overall survival (OS) were examined using log-rank tests and Cox regression, with correction for multiple testing (p < 0.01 was significant). RESULTS: 580 newly-diagnosed gliosarcoma patients with MGMT status were available, among whom 33.6% were MGMT promoter methylated. Median OS for gliosarcoma patients that received standard-of-care temozolomide and radiotherapy was 12.1 months (99% confidence interval [CI] 10.8-15.1) for MGMT promoter unmethylated and 21.4 months (99% CI 15.4-26.2) for MGMT promoter methylated gliosarcomas (p = 0.003). In multivariable analysis of gliosarcoma patients-which included the potential confounders of age, sex, maximal tumor size, extent of resection, and radiotherapy-receipt of temozolomide was associated with improved OS in both MGMT promoter methylated (hazard ratio [HR] 0.23 vs. no temozolomide, 99% CI 0.11-0.47, p < 0.001) and unmethylated (HR 0.50 vs. no temozolomide, 99% CI 0.29-0.89, p = 0.002) gliosarcomas. MGMT promoter methylation was associated with improved OS among temozolomide-treated gliosarcoma patients (p < 0.001), but not in patients who did not receive chemotherapy (p = 0.35). CONCLUSION: In a national analysis of gliosarcoma patients, temozolomide was associated with prolonged OS irrespective of MGMT status. These results provide support for the current practice of trimodal therapy for gliosarcoma.

A Unique Case Report of Infant-Type Hemispheric Glioma (Gliosarcoma Subtype) with TPR-NTRK1 Fusion Treated with Larotrectinib.

Herein, we present a rare case of a nine-month-old boy diagnosed with infant-type hemispheric glioma (gliosarcoma subtype) at the left frontal lobe. Following subtotal resection, the patient started chemotherapy with the BABY POG protocol. We describe the clinical diagnosis, histological characteristics, radiological features, molecular aspects, and management of this tumor. A comprehensive molecular analysis on the tumor tissue showed a TPR-NTRK1 gene fusion. The patient was treated with a TRK inhibitor, larotrectinib, and exhibited a stable disease with residual lesion following 8 months of target therapy. The present study is the first report of an infantile gliosarcoma harboring NTRK1 rearrangement treated with larotrectinib.

Gliosarcoma with unusual glial components: Two case reports.

Gliosarcoma is characterized by the presence of alternating lesions of glial and mesenchymal components. Although many mesenchymal components have been reported, there are few reports on glial components. We here report two cases of gliosarcoma. Case 1 was a 42-year-old woman with right hemiparesis and motor aphasia. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) identified a tumor in the left frontal lobe. Pathological analysis of the tumor removal specimen revealed gliosarcoma, with a glial component resembling pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma. Postoperatively, radiotherapy and chemotherapy were conducted, and the patient was symptom-free over 12 months after surgery. Case 2 was a 67-year-old woman with a consciousness disorder and left hemiparesis. MRI revealed a tumor in the right frontal lobe. Pathological analysis of the first tumor removal specimen identified gliosarcoma, with a glial component characterized by large tumor cells. Additionally, the Ki-67 labeling index of the glial component was greater than that of the mesenchymal component, and molecular genetic analysis disclosed a mutation in the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene (TERT). Chemotherapy and radiotherapy were performed. Four months later, MRI revealed recurrence, and the second surgery was performed. Pathological analysis revealed giant cell glioblastoma without TERT mutation. The patient died due to tumor progression 12 months after the first surgery. It is essential to continue histopathological evaluation of glial components, and further genetic evaluation on gliosarcoma is required.

Secondary gliosarcoma: the clinicopathological features and the development of a patient-derived xenograft model of gliosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Gliosarcoma (GSM) is a distinct and aggressive variant of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) with worse prognosis and few treatment options. It is often managed with the same treatment modalities with temozolomide (TMZ) as in GBM. However, the therapeutic benefits on GSM from such treatment regimen is largely unknown. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models have been used widely to model tumor progression, and subsequently to validate biomarkers and inform potential therapeutic regimens. Here, we report for the first time the successful development of a PDX model of secondary GSM. METHODS: Tissue obtained from a tumor resection revealed a secondary GSM arising from GBM. The clinical, radiological, and histopathological records of the patient were retrospectively reviewed. Samples obtained from surgery were cultured ex vivo and/or implanted subcutaneously in immunocompromised mice. Histopathological features between the primary GBM, secondary GSM, and GSM PDX are compared. RESULTS: In explant culture, the cells displayed a spindle-shaped morphology under phase contrast microscopy, consistent with the sarcomatous component. GSM samples were subcutaneously engrafted into immunocompromised mice after single-cell suspension. Xenografts of serial passages showed enhanced growth rate with increased in vivo passage. We did not observe any histopathological differences between the secondary GSM and its serial in vivo passages of PDX tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Our PDX model for GSM retained the histopathological characteristics of the engrafted tumor from the patient. It may provide valuable information to facilitate molecular and histopathological modelling of GSM and be of significant implication in future research to establish precise cancer medicine for this highly malignant tumor.

Gliosarcoma vs. glioblastoma: a retrospective case series using molecular profiling.

BACKGROUND: Gliosarcoma (GS) refers to the presence of mesenchymal differentiation (as seen using light microscopy) in the setting of glioblastoma (GB, an astrocytoma, WHO Grade 4). Although the same approach to treatment is typically adopted for GS and GB, there remains some debate as to whether GS should be considered a discrete pathological entity. Differences between these tumors have not been clearly established at the molecular level. METHODS: Patients with GS (n=48) or GB (n=1229) underwent molecular profiling (MP) with a pan-cancer panel of tests as part of their clinical care. The methods employed included next-generation sequencing (NGS) of DNA and RNA, copy number variation (CNV) of DNA and immunohistochemistry (IHC). The MP comprised 1153 tests in total, although results for each test were not available for every tumor profiled. We analyzed this data retrospectively in order to determine if our results were in keeping with what is known about the pathogenesis of GS by contrast with GB. We also sought novel associations between the MP and GS vs. GB which might improve our understanding of pathogenesis of GS. RESULTS: Potentially meaningful associations (p<0.1, Fisher's exact test (FET)) were found for 14 of these tests in GS vs. GB. A novel finding was higher levels of proteins mediating immuno-evasion (PD-1, PD-L1) in GS. All of the differences we observed have been associated with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in other tumor types. Many of the changes we saw in GS are novel in the setting of glial tumors, including copy number amplification in LYL1 and mutations in PTPN11. CONCLUSIONS: GS shows certain characteristics of EMT, by contrast with GB. Treatments targeting immuno-evasion may be of greater therapeutic value in GS relative to GB.

Pediatric Gliosarcoma With and Without Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Whole-exome Comparison of 2 Patients.

Gliosarcoma is rare among pediatric patients and among individuals with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1). Here we compare 2 pediatric gliosarcoma patients, one of whom has NF1. We performed whole-exome sequencing, methylation, and copy number analysis on tumor and blood for both patients. Whole-exome sequencing showed higher mutational burden in the tumor of the patient without NF1. Copy number analysis showed differences in chromosomal losses/gains between the tumors. Neither tumor showed O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation. The NF1 patient survived without progression while the other expired. This is the first reported case of gliosarcoma in a child with NF1.

Gliosarcoma with PNET features mimicking a metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: A diagnostic dilemma.

OBJECTIVE: Gliosarcomas (GS) comprise ~ 2 - 8% of glioblastomas and are associated with a similar poor prognosis. GS have rarely been found with a primitive neuroectodermal component (PNET). We present a case of gliosarcoma with PNET features (GS-PNET) that mimicked a neuroendocrine carcinoma on initial biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 68-year-old male presented with 2 weeks of increasing headaches and difficulties with reading, writing, and word-finding. He was found to have a left-sided parieto-occipital heterogeneously enhancing mass. RESULTS: Pathologic analysis after surgical resection initially diagnosed a poorly differentiated carcinoma with neuroendocrine features, and adjuvant therapy was guided by this diagnosis as well as systemic imaging, which was suggestive of gastrointestinal primary malignancy with central nervous system (CNS) metastasis. Subsequent progression and re-resection established a diagnosis of GS with PNET component. Genomic profiling showed shared PTEN, TERT promotor, and TP53 mutations in the original and recurrent tumors. CONCLUSION: There have only been 5 previously reported cases of GS-PNET, to our knowledge, with this case representing the first with comprehensive molecular profiling. The case also highlights the importance of further work-up of presumed metastatic carcinoma with indeterminate immunostaining and/or suspected non-epithelioid component.

Gliosarcoma in patients under 20 years of age. A clinicopathologic study of 11 cases and detailed review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Gliosarcoma is a rare variant of IDH- wild type glioblastoma with both glial and mesenchymal differentiation. It accounts for approximately 2% of glioblastomas and has a poor prognosis similar to that of classic glioblastoma. It is seen mostly between 40 and 60 years of age with a mean age over 50 years. Pediatric gliosarcoma is even rarer than gliosarcoma in adults. We describe the clinicopathological features of gliosarcoma in patients under 20 years of age and determine whether there are significant differences from gliosarcoma in adults. We also present detailed review of published literature on pediatric gliosarcoma. METHODS: Slides of gliosarcomas in patients under 20 years of age were reviewed. Clinicopathological features were noted in detail and follow up was obtained. RESULTS: Eleven cases of gliosarcoma were reported in patients under 20 years of age. Ages ranged from three to 19 years (mean age 13 years). Frontal, parietal and temporal lobes were the commonest locations. Mean and median tumor size was six and five cm respectively. All 11 cases demonstrated the classic biphasic pattern. In 10 cases, glial component was astrocytic and was highlighted on GFAP. Sarcomatous component in most cases resembled fibrosarcoma and was high grade in 72.7%. Glial areas were reticulin poor while sarcomatous areas were reticulin rich. In over 45% cases, bizarre tumor giant cells were seen in the sarcomatous areas. In 1 case, sarcomatous areas showed extensive bone and cartilage formation. Other histologic features included hyalinized blood vessels, hemorrhage, infarction, gemistocytic cells, rhabdoid cells etc. Follow up was available in nine patients, five received chemoradiation post resection while three received radiotherapy only. Prognosis was dismal and eight patients died within one to 14 months following resection. CONCLUSIONS: Gliosarcomas in patients under 20 comprised 13% of all gliosarcomas reported during the study period. Frequency and mean age were higher compared to other published reports. Pathological features were similar to those described in literature. Clinicopathological features and prognosis of pediatric gliosarcomas were similar to adult gliosarcomas.

The clinical, radiological, and immunohistochemical characteristics and outcomes of primary intracranial gliosarcoma: a retrospective single-centre study.

Primary intracranial gliosarcoma is a rare malignant brain tumour, and the most effective treatment for gliosarcoma remains unclear. This study aimed to identify risk factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in these cases. This retrospective single-centre study evaluated 103 patients (median age, 51 years; 67 men [65%]) with primary intracranial gliosarcoma between 2006 and 2017. Treatments included surgery (GTR, 63 patients; STR, 39 patients; biopsy, 1 patient), radiotherapy (adjuvant, 76 patients; exclusive treatment, 1 patient), and chemotherapy (adjuvant temozolomide, 52 patients; adjuvant nimustine/teniposide, 19 patients; adjuvant bevacizumab, 1 patient; exclusive nimustine/teniposide treatment, 1 patient). The median OS was 13.3 months, and the median PFS was 9.1 months. In the multivariate analyses, the poor prognostic factors were ependymal lining enhancement of the lateral ventricle (PFS, HR 2.406, p = 0.005; OS, HR 2.946, p = 0.009) and enhancement in the motor functional cortex (PFS, HR 2.892, p = 0.002; OS, HR 2.639, p = 0.009). Good OS was predicted by adjuvant radiotherapy alone (HR 0.071, p < 0.001), adjuvant temozolomide-based chemotherapy alone (HR 0.063, p = 0.005), adjuvant temozolomide-based chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy (HR 0.056, p < 0.001), and salvage surgery at recurrence (HR 0.449, p = 0.031). The present study revealed that, in patients with primary intracranial gliosarcoma, enhancement in the functional motor cortex and ependymal lining enhancement of the lateral ventricle were both poor prognostic factors. Survival was optimized in cases treated using maximal safe resection followed by adjuvant temozolomide-based chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy. Furthermore, salvage surgery provided meaningful therapeutic benefits for recurrent gliosarcoma.

NRG/RTOG 1122: A phase 2, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of bevacizumab with and without trebananib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma or gliosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) alone does not improve overall survival (OS) in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). The angiopoiein (Ang)-TIE2 system may play a role in tumor survival under VEGF inhibition. We conducted a phase 2, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of bevacizumab plus trebananib (a novel Fc fusion protein that sequesters Ang1/Ang2) over bevacizumab alone in rGBM. METHODS: Patients ≥18 years of age with a Karnofsky performance status ≥70 and GBM or variants in first or second relapse were randomized to bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus trebananib 15 mg/kg every week or bevacizumab plus placebo. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: After an initial 6-patient lead-in cohort confirmed the safety of combining bevacizumab and trebananib, 115 eligible patients were randomized to the control (n = 58) or experimental treatment (n = 57). In the control arm, 6-month PFS was 41.1%, median survival time was 11.5 months (95% CI, 8.4-14.2 months), median PFS was 4.8 months (95% CI, 3.8-7.1 months), and radiographic response (RR) was 5.9%. In the experimental arm, 6-month PFS was 22.6%, median survival time was 7.5 months (95% CI, 6.8-10.1 months), median PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.7-5.6 months), and RR was 4.2%. The rate of severe toxicities was not significantly different between arms. CONCLUSION: The combination of bevacizumab and trebananib was well tolerated but did not significantly improve 6-month PFS rate, PFS, or OS for patients with rGBM over bevacizumab alone. The shorter PFS in the experimental arm with a hazard ratio of 1.51 (P = .04) suggests that the addition of trebananib to bevacizumab is detrimental.

Spinal metastasis of glioblastoma multiforme before gliosarcomatous transformation: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of the most aggressive malignant brain tumors. Intracranial GBM metastases to the spine are rarely detected clinically. Secondary gliosarcomas after treatment of primary GBM are rarely described. CASE PRESENTATION: Herein, we report the case of a 53-year-old woman who presented to our emergency room with progressive headache and weakness on the left side. Plain computed tomography and contrast magnetic resonance imaging of the brain revealed an approximately 6.8 cm × 4.5 cm right temporoparietooccipital intraaxial cystic tumor with surrounding diffuse perifocal edema that caused midline shift toward the left. Emergency craniotomy was performed to remove the tumor, and pathological examination revealed GBM. The patient received proton beam therapy, Gliadel implantation, and oral temozolomide chemotherapy as well as targeted therapy with bevacizumab. Approximately 15 months after diagnosis, she underwent surgical resection of the right temporal recurrent tumor and was newly diagnosed as having a metastatic spinal tumor. Pathologically, the right temporal and metastatic spinal tumors were gliosarcoma and GBM, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent spinal metastasis and gliosarcomatous transformation, which are two types of GBM complications, are rare. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a case of recurrent GBM with gliosarcoma after proton bean therapy.

A rare case of BRAF V600E-mutated epithelioid glioblastoma with a sarcomatous component.

Epithelioid glioblastoma is a rare subtype of glioblastoma, but the coexistence of a sarcomatous component is even rarer. An 80-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with somnolence. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a cystic lesion with a solid component in the left temporal-parietal lobe. Histopathological examination of the resected tumor revealed three components; namely, typical glioblastoma, sarcomatous and epithelioid components at a ratio of about 5:3:2. All components were immunohistochemically positive for vimentin and mutated BRAF (V600E) and showed focal expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein and cytokeratin AE1/AE3, but they were negative for isocitrate dehydrogenase 1. Genetic analysis revealed that both the sarcomatous and epithelioid components harbored BRAF T1799A (V600E) mutation and homozygous deletion of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/B. We diagnosed this tumor as epithelial glioblastoma with a sarcomatous component. Our results indicate that even when the epithelial component is not dominant, immunohistochemical and genetic investigation of BRAF mutations is useful for the diagnosis of glioblastoma subtypes. In particular, although the prognosis of epithelial glioblastoma is poor, potentially effective targeted therapies for BRAF V600E-mutated tumors are available.

Prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in adult primary gliosarcoma patients: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) analysis from 2004 to 2015.

Objective: Gliosarcoma (GSC), a rare malignant brain tumor, is considered as a variant of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 wild type (IDH1-WT) glioblastoma (GBM). This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the clinical characteristics of GSC and compare whether there are some differences of treatment strategies and outcomes between GSC and GBM patients through Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.Patients and methods: The clinical data of adults diagnosed with primary GSC between 2004 and 2015 were queried from SEER database. The Kaplan-Meier curve and the Cox model were performed to analyze the relationships between clinical parameters and patients' prognosis. Similar analyses were conducted for all primary GBM patients of SEER.Results: In total, 527 GSC and 20,541 GBM patients with complete and valid clinical information were finally enrolled for further analysis. Compared with GBM, GSC owned a proclivity to temporal lobe rather than frontal lobe (p < 0.001), a less conservative extension of resection (EOR) (p < 0.001), and a higher sensitivity to radiotherapy (p < 0.001). As shown by univariate analysis, surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy could prolong the overall survival (OS) time of GSC, but EOR did not confer an advantage to the outcomes of patients, no matter whether combined radio/chemotherapy was given. In multivariate analysis, age more than 60 and lack of radio/chemotherapy were identified as independent risk factors for OS of GSC patients.Conclusions: Our study found that although EOR seemed to be important to GBM, the extent of surgery did not show a clear relationship with the improved prognosis of GSC. Additionally, radiotherapy and chemotherapy could prolong patients' survival time significantly, which suggests a more positive role of them in treating GSC and needs further investigations.

Simultaneous perfusion and permeability assessments using multiband multi-echo EPI (M2-EPI) in brain tumors.

PURPOSE: To study a multiband multi-echo EPI (M2-EPI) sequence for dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion imaging with leakage correction and vascular permeability measurements, and to evaluate the benefits of increased temporal resolution provided by this acquisition strategy on the accuracy of perfusion and permeability estimations. METHODS: A novel M2-EPI sequence was developed, and a pharmacokinetic model accounting for contrast agent extravasation was used to produce perfusion maps and additional vascular permeability maps. The advantage of M2-EPI for DSC perfusion imaging was demonstrated in vivo in 5 patients with brain tumors, and numerical simulations were performed to evaluate the advantage of improved temporal resolution afforded by the technique. RESULTS: In contrast to underestimations of cerebral blood volume (CBV) in tumors using the single-echo acquisition strategy, M2-EPI provided more plausible estimates of CBV. A quantitative evaluation showed higher estimated values of CBV and mean transit time in tumor tissues using M2-EPI (CBV: 3.08 ± 0.78 mL/100 g versus 1.56 ± 1.38 mL/100 g [P = .006]; mean transit time: 4.94 ± 1.17 seconds versus 1.83 ± 2.06 seconds [P = 0.033]). Numerical simulations showed that higher temporal resolution provided by M2-EPI was associated with more accurate estimates of cerebral blood flow, CBV, and permeability parameters. CONCLUSION: The novel M2-EPI acquisition strategy for DSC imaging facilitates leakage-corrected perfusion measurements with additional permeability assessments and more accurate estimates of perfusion/permeability parameters, and may be used as a quantitative tool for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring of brain tumors.

Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) signal intensity at 7T MRI of WHO IV° gliomas is dependent on the anatomic location.

BACKGROUND: Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) is a novel MRI technique applied to brain tumor patients. PURPOSE: To investigate the anatomic location dependence of CEST MRI obtained at 7T and histopathological/molecular parameters in WHO IV° glioma patients. STUDY TYPE: Analytic prospective study. POPULATION: Twenty-one patients with newly diagnosed WHO IV° gliomas were studied prior to surgery; 11 healthy volunteers were investigated. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Conventional MRI (contrast-enhanced, T2 w and diffusion-weighted imaging) at 3T and T2 w and CEST MRI at 7T was performed for patients and both patients and volunteers. ASSESSMENT: Mean CEST signal intensities (nuclear-Overhauser-enhancement [NOE], amide-proton-transfer [APT], downfield NOE-suppressed APT [dns-APT]), ADC values, and histopathological/molecular parameters were evaluated with regard to hemisphere location and contact with the subventricular zone. CEST signal intensities of cerebral tissue of healthy volunteers were evaluated with regard to hemisphere discrimination. STATISTICAL TESTS: Spearman correlation, Mann-Whitney U-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank-test, Fisher's exact test, and area under the receiver operating curve. RESULTS: Maximum APT and dns-APT signal intensities were significantly different in right vs. left hemisphere gliomas (P = 0.037 and P = 0.007), but not in right vs. left hemisphere cerebral tissue of healthy subjects (P = 0.062-0.859). Mean ADC values were significantly decreased in right vs. left hemisphere gliomas (P = 0.044). Mean NOE signal intensity did not differ significantly between gliomas of either hemisphere (P = 0.820), but in case of subventricular zone contact (P = 0.047). A significant correlation was observed between APT and dns-APT and ADC signal intensities (rs = -0.627, P = 0.004 and rs = -0.534, P = 0.019), but not between NOE and ADC (rs = -0.341, P = 0.154). Histopathological/molecular parameters were not significantly different concerning the tumor location (P = 0.104-1.000, P = 0.286-0.696). DATA CONCLUSION: APT, dns-APT, and ADC were inversely correlated and depended on the gliomas' hemisphere location. NOE showed significant dependence on subventricular zone contact. Location dependency of APT- and NOE-mediated CEST effects should be considered in clinical investigations of CEST MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:777-785.

Racial/ethnic differences in survival for patients with gliosarcoma: an analysis of the National cancer database.

PURPOSE: Gliosarcoma is characterized by the World Health Organization as a Grade IV malignant neoplasm and a variant of glioblastoma. The association of race and ethnicity with survival has been established for numerous CNS malignancies, however, no epidemiological studies have reported these findings for patients with gliosarcoma. The aim of this study was to examine differences by race and ethnicity in overall survival, 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and 30-day readmission. METHODS: Data were obtained by query of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for years 2004-2014. Patients with gliosarcoma were identified by International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition (ICD-O-3)-Oncology morphologic code 9442/3 and topographical codes C71.0-C71.9. Differences in survival by race/ethnicity were examined using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Readmission and mortality outcomes were examined with univariable and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 1988 patients diagnosed with gliosarcoma were identified (White Non-Hispanic n = 1,682, Black Non-Hispanic n = 165, Asian n = 40, Hispanic n = 101). There were no differences in overall survival, 30- and 90-day mortality, or 30-day readmission between the races and ethnicities examined. Median survival was 10.4 months for White Non-Hispanics (95% CI 9.8, 11.2), 10.2 months for Black Non-Hispanics (95% CI 8.6, 13.1), 9.0 months for Asian Non-Hispanics (95% CI 5.1, 18.2), and 10.6 months for Hispanics (95% CI 8.3,16.2). 7.3% of all patients examined had an unplanned readmission within 30 days. CONCLUSION: Race/ethnicity are not associated with differences in overall survival, 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, or 30-day readmission following surgical intervention for gliosarcoma.

Gliosarcoma: distinct molecular pathways and genomic alterations identified by DNA copy number/SNP microarray analysis.

PURPOSE: Gliosarcoma is a histologic variant of glioblastoma (GBM), and like GBM carries a poor prognosis. Median survival is less than one (1) year with less than 5% of patients alive after 5 years. Although there is no cure, standard treatment includes surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. While very similar to GBM, gliosarcoma exhibits several distinct differences, morphologically and molecularly. Therefore, we report a comprehensive analysis of DNA copy number changes in gliosarcoma using a cytogenomic DNA copy number (CN) microarray (OncoScan®). METHODS: Cytogenomic DNA copy number microarray (OncoScan®) was performed on 18 cases of gliosarcoma. MetaCore™ enrichment was applied to the array results to detect associated molecular pathways. RESULTS: The most frequent alteration was copy number loss, comprising 57% of total copy number changes. The number of losses far exceeded the number of amplifications (***, < 0.001) and loss of heterozygosity events (***, < 0.001). Amplifications were infrequent (4.6%), particularly for EGFR. Chromosomes 9 and 10 had the highest number of losses; a large portion of which correlated to CDKN2A/B loss. Copy number gains were the second most common alteration (26.2%), with the majority occurring on chromosome 7. MetaCore™ enrichment detected notable pathways for copy number gains including: HOXA, Rho family of GTPases, and EGFR; copy number loss including: WNT, NF-kß, and CDKN2A; and copy number loss of heterozygosity including: WNT and p53. CONCLUSIONS: The pathways and copy number alterations detected in this study may represent key drivers in gliosarcoma oncogenesis and may provide a starting point toward targeted oncologic analysis with therapeutic potential.

Gliosarcoma: a clinical and radiological analysis of 48 cases.

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively review the radiological and clinicopathological features of gliosarcoma (GSM) and differentiate it from glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). METHODS: The clinicopathological data and imaging findings (including VASARI analysis) of 48 surgically and pathologically confirmed GSM patients (group 1) were reviewed in detail, and were compared with that of other glioblastoma (GBM) cases in our hospital (group 2). RESULTS: There were 28 men and 20 women GSM patients with a median age of 52.5 years (range, 24-80 years) in this study. Haemorrhage (n = 21), a salt-and-pepper sign on T2-weighted images (n = 36), unevenly thickened wall (n = 36) even appearing as a paliform pattern (n = 32), an intra-tumoural large feeding artery (n = 32) and an eccentric cystic portion (ECP) (n = 19) were more commonly observed in the GSM group than in GBM patients. Based on our experience, GSM can be divided into four subtypes according to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features. When compared to GBM (group 2), there were more patients designated with type III lesions (having very unevenly thickened walls) and IV (solid) lesions among the GSM cases (group 1). On univariate prognostic analysis, adjuvant therapy (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and radiochemotherapy) and existence of an eccentric cyst region were prognostic factors. However, Cox's regression model showed only adjuvant therapy as a prognostic factor for GSM. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to GBM, certain imaging features are more likely to occur in GSM, which may help raise the possibility of this disease. All GSM patients are recommended to receive adjuvant therapy to achieve a better prognosis with radiotherapy, chemotherapy or radiochemotherapy all as options. KEY POINTS: • Diagnosis of gliosarcoma can be suggested preoperatively by imaging. • Gliosarcoma can be divided into four subtypes based on MRI. • Paliform pattern and ECP tend to present in gliosarcoma more than GBM. • The cystic subtype of gliosarcoma may predict a more dismal prognosis. • All gliosarcoma patients should receive adjuvant therapy to achieve better prognosis.