Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 58
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Afr J Reprod Health ; 24(1): 165-181, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32358948

ABSTRACT

In light of the relational account of autonomy and the modern (holistic and phenomenological) account of health, this paper examines ethical justifications for ̳consensual' reinfibulation. Significant and constant discomfort in the body following deinfibulation might make a case for reinfibulation (considered as medical treatment in the traditional sense of the term). In any other case, the following requirements should be met for reinfibulation to be considered medically plausible: a) strong evidence that reinfibulation could help effectively improve woman's relational well-being, b) insignificant complications are expected, c) congruence between first-order and second-order autonomy or -in the context of political liberalism- strong second-order autonomy, d) an -open door‖ for the woman to exit an oppressive context, e) rigorous scrutiny of woman's psychology, and f) woman's practical wisdom to organize her identity-related values, find a balance between her extreme emotions and realize her own goal of meaningful life in accordance with her own conception of the good. Conclusively, in carefully screened cases and individually judged requests for reinfibulation, it should not be ruled out that, after having been conducted a multi-disciplinary in- depth investigation at social, psychological and medical level may be met conditions that make a case for reinfibulation.


Subject(s)
Circumcision, Female/psychology , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/psychology , Women's Health , Women's Rights , Circumcision, Female/rehabilitation , Ethics, Medical , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/ethics , Humans
2.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 26(2): 279-287, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30243685

ABSTRACT

It is becoming increasingly clear that surgeon volume affects surgical outcomes. High-volume surgeons demonstrate reduced perioperative complications, shorter operative times, and reduced blood loss during multiple modalities of benign gynecologic surgery. Furthermore, high-volume surgeons consistently demonstrate higher rates of minimally invasive approaches, low rates of conversion to laparotomy, and lower per-procedure case costs. It is suggested that surgeons who have completed postresidency training have improved surgical outcomes, although these data are limited. Surgical exposure in obstetrics and gynecology residency is varied and does not consistently meet demonstrated surgical learning curves. Deficiencies in residency surgical training may be related to the volume-outcome relationship. We suggest reforming residency surgical training and tracking postresidency practice to provide optimal surgical care. Additionally, surgeons may have an ethical obligation to inform patients of their surgical volume and outcomes, with options for referrals if needed.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures , Gynecology/education , Internship and Residency/methods , Learning Curve , Obstetrics/education , Surgeons/education , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/education , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/ethics , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Gynecology/ethics , Humans , Obstetrics/ethics , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Surgeons/ethics , United States
3.
J Sex Med ; 14(8): 1003-1010, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28760245

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hymenoplasty, commonly called "revirginization," is a controversial procedure that pushes the scope of medical practice to satisfy cultural and/or religious "needs." AIM: To outline the sociocultural contexts underlying patient requests for hymenoplasty and present Islamic juridical views on the moral status of hymenoplasty for Muslim patients. METHODS: Narrative review of the extant bioethics literature and leading Islamic ethico-legal verdicts. OUTCOMES: We identified "Western" and Islamic bioethical debates on hymenoplasty and the critical concepts that underpin ethical justifications for and against the procedure. RESULTS: From a Western-ethics perspective, the life-saving potential of the procedure is weighed against the role of the surgeon in directly assisting in a deception and in indirectly promoting cultural practices of sexual inequality. From an Islamic bioethical vantage point, jurists offer two opinions. The first is that the surgery is always impermissible. The second is that although the surgery is generally impermissible, it can become licit when the risks of not having postcoital bleeding harm are sufficiently great. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patient requests for hymenoplasty should be approached by surgeons with a willingness to understand patients' social contexts and reasons for pursuing the procedure and are ethically justified by leading Islamic jurists in particular circumstances. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This article presents emic and etic perspectives on hymenoplasty in Muslim patients, although our review of the Islamic bioethical stances might have missed some juridical opinions and important considerations. Further, Muslims, even devout ones, might not be beholden to Islamic juridical views on medical procedures and thus physicians should not make assumptions about the rationale for, and ethical views of, patients seeking hymenoplasty. CONCLUSION: This article provides critical insight into how Muslim patients, and Islamic jurists, evaluate the moral contexts of hymenoplasty. Bawany MH, Padela AI. Hymenoplasty and Muslim Patients: Islamic Ethico-Legal Perspectives. J Sex Med 2017;14:1003-1010.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/ethics , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/legislation & jurisprudence , Islam/psychology , Patients/psychology , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/psychology , Humans , Patients/legislation & jurisprudence , Physicians/ethics , Religion and Medicine , Socioeconomic Factors
4.
J Reprod Med ; 61(1-2): 33-8, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26995886

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze scientific integrity (scientific quality, objectivity, credibility, and appropriate transparency) of recommendations of gynecologic societies for female genital cosmetic surgery (FGCS) and their references, which were used to support these recommendations. STUDY DESIGN: The scientific integrity of recommendations for FGCS published by gynecologic societies has never been subjected to scientific scrutiny. Electronic and manual searches for FGCS literature published in the English language were conducted and analyzed for the period of the recommendations. A methodological scientific review of recommendations of gynecologic societies for FGCS was performed. The scientific quality, objectivity, credibility, and appropriate transparency within recommendations of gynecologic societies for FGCS were evaluated. RESULTS: Overt prejudice and residual bias were found in the recommendations of gynecologic societies relating to FGCS. Scientific imprecise interpretations and omissions of references called current recommendations into questions. CONCLUSION: Recommendations issued by gynecologic societies relating to FGCS did not meet the scientific integrity norms for scientific quality, objectivity, credibility, and appropriate transparency.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/ethics , Societies, Medical/ethics , Women's Health/ethics , Deception , Ethics, Professional , Female , Humans , Professional Misconduct
5.
J Med Ethics ; 41(3): 215-9, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24574429

ABSTRACT

Many countries, Sweden among them, lack professional guidelines and established procedures for responding to young females requesting virginity certificates or hymen restoration due to honour-related threats. The purpose of the present survey study was to further examine the attitudes of the Swedish healthcare professionals concerned towards young females requesting virginity certificates or hymen restorations. The study indicates that a small majority of Swedish general practitioners and gynaecologists would accommodate these patients, at least given certain circumstances. But a large minority of physicians would under no circumstances help the young females, regardless of speciality, years of practice within medicine, gender, or experience of the phenomenon. Their responses are similar to other areas where it has been claimed that society should adopt a zero tolerance policy against certain phenomena, for instance drug policy, where it has also been argued that society should never act in ways that express support for the practice in question. However, this argument is questionable. A more pragmatic approach would also allow for follow-ups and evaluation of virginity certificates and hymen restorations, as is demonstrated by the Dutch policy. Hence, there are some obvious advantages to this pragmatic approach compared to the restrictive one espoused by a large minority of Swedish physicians and Swedish policy-makers in this area.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Conflict, Psychological , Deception , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/ethics , Gynecological Examination , Hymen/surgery , Physicians , Plastic Surgery Procedures/ethics , Sexual Abstinence , Social Values , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cultural Characteristics , Ethics, Medical , Family Characteristics , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Middle East , Physicians/ethics , Physicians/psychology , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Public Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Public Policy/trends , Sweden/epidemiology , Young Adult
6.
J Clin Ethics ; 26(2): 158-60, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26132064

ABSTRACT

The hymen is a structure of the female genitalia that is poorly understood even by many medical professionals. Despite the significant anatomical variation in the hymen and no guarantee that rupture or bleeding will occur at first coitus, it has come to hold major cultural significance around the world as a perceived biological indicator of virginity. The persistence of such myths around the hymen causes real harm, including the increase in so-called revirgination surgical procedures.


Subject(s)
Arabs , Coitus , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/ethics , Hymen/surgery , Islam , Personal Autonomy , Physicians/ethics , Plastic Surgery Procedures/ethics , Referral and Consultation/ethics , Sexism , Sexual Abstinence , Social Values , Female , Humans
7.
J Clin Ethics ; 26(2): 161, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26132065

ABSTRACT

Some traditional cultural practices assure expected wedding night bleeding, to help preserve the honor of all parties.


Subject(s)
Arabs , Coitus , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/ethics , Hymen/surgery , Islam , Personal Autonomy , Physicians/ethics , Plastic Surgery Procedures/ethics , Referral and Consultation/ethics , Sexism , Sexual Abstinence , Social Values , Female , Humans
8.
J Clin Ethics ; 26(2): 162-5, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26132066

ABSTRACT

The discourse among medical and scientific communities on hymen restoration is largely missing the voice of women affected. This article calls for a more nuanced reflection on women's real life experiences and the complexities inherent in the negotiation process about the surgery going beyond "ideologies" and the extremes of rape and threats to life. By taking the clinical experience of a woman who requests restoration surgery before her arranged marriage, this article illuminates the grey zone beyond these extremes and explores an individual woman's options for making her own choices.


Subject(s)
Arabs , Coitus , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/ethics , Hymen/surgery , Islam , Personal Autonomy , Physicians/ethics , Plastic Surgery Procedures/ethics , Referral and Consultation/ethics , Sexism , Sexual Abstinence , Social Values , Female , Humans
9.
J Clin Ethics ; 26(2): 166-71, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26132067

ABSTRACT

Hymenoplasty is a minor surgical procedure requested by women who, for cultural or religious reasons, need to remain a virgin until marriage. In this article I assess whether the public healthcare system of a liberal state should provide it as part of a policy of multicultural accommodation. I conclude that, in order to remain loyal to certain ethical ideals linked to the rule of law, liberal states should give access to hymenoplasty only to women for whom premarital virginity is a precondition for their flourishing within their community and who say they are victims of sexual assault.


Subject(s)
Arabs , Coitus , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/ethics , Hymen/surgery , Islam , Personal Autonomy , Physicians/ethics , Plastic Surgery Procedures/ethics , Referral and Consultation/ethics , Sexism , Sexual Abstinence , Social Values , Female , Humans
10.
J Clin Ethics ; 26(2): 172-5, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26132068

ABSTRACT

Hymenoplasty is a practice that must be judged from within its cultural confines and not only from outside. It offers women who have grown up within the sexual norms of a Western society the chance to return to their parental culture, with its female-specific virginity expectations. Hymenoplasty allows women to be sexually active prior to marriage, which equalizes the discrepancy between gender norms on premarital sexual experience. Caution is needed when comparing hymenoplasty to female genital mutilation. However, comparing hymenoplasty to other cosmetic genital modification procedures raises unique ethical, social, and medical quandaries that highlight the importance of patient's autonomy.


Subject(s)
Arabs , Coitus , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/ethics , Hymen/surgery , Islam , Personal Autonomy , Physicians/ethics , Plastic Surgery Procedures/ethics , Referral and Consultation/ethics , Sexism , Sexual Abstinence , Social Values , Female , Humans
11.
J Clin Ethics ; 26(2): 176-9, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26132069

ABSTRACT

Doctoring the genitals is compatible with a recognizable conception of social medicine. This commentary critically examines the distinction between medical and nonmedical procedures; presents an alternative account of Sohaila Bastami's personal reaction to the anonymous caller's request for referral information concerning hymen reconstruction surgery; and makes use of Yelp to simulate the caller's procedure for locating a helpful practitioner. Yelp is a very useful informational search engine that does not subject its users to a moral examination.


Subject(s)
Arabs , Coitus , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/ethics , Hymen/surgery , Islam , Personal Autonomy , Physicians/ethics , Plastic Surgery Procedures/ethics , Referral and Consultation/ethics , Sexism , Sexual Abstinence , Social Values , Female , Humans
12.
J Clin Ethics ; 26(2): 152, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26132062

ABSTRACT

Hymen reconstruction surgery is a simple procedure to repair a woman's hymen, requested by women who, for religious and cultural reasons, believe they must appear to have an intact hymen on their wedding night. Debates surrounding possible ethical justification for the procedure are complex and heated. These articles from the Harvard Ethics Consortium present and explore the case of a young woman who asked a young female physician on call for a referral for the procedure.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/ethics , Hymen/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/ethics , Referral and Consultation/ethics , Religion , Sexism , Sexual Abstinence , Social Values , Adult , Coitus , Deception , Ethnicity , Female , Humans , Marriage
13.
J Clin Ethics ; 26(2): 153-7, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26132063

ABSTRACT

A young woman called me to ask for a referral to a physician who provided hymen reconstruction surgery. She had had premarital intercourse and came from a cultural background in which it was very important to "prove virginity" on the wedding night. This article deals with my internal struggle whether or not to provide the referral. I felt that providing it would have made me complicit in supporting gender inequality, as men are not required to "prove virginity" to get married. At the same time, I was concerned about the repercussions of not being able to "prove virginity" would have on the caller. I had no explicit guidance on what to do in such a situation--it was not covered by the professional responsibilities I had as a research assistant.


Subject(s)
Arabs , Coitus , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/ethics , Hymen/surgery , Islam , Personal Autonomy , Physicians/ethics , Plastic Surgery Procedures/ethics , Referral and Consultation/ethics , Sexism , Sexual Abstinence , Social Values , Coercion , Cultural Characteristics , Deception , Ethics, Medical , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Marriage , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/ethics , Moral Obligations , Physicians/legislation & jurisprudence , Plastic Surgery Procedures/legislation & jurisprudence , United States
14.
J Med Ethics ; 40(6): 429-30, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23764547

ABSTRACT

Hymenoplasty, practiced in societies wherein a woman's virginity signifies honour, is a controversial surgery raising a multitude of ethical issues. There is a dearth of research uncovering the views of physicians who perform hymenoplasty, especially in sexually conservative cultures, such as Iran. Interviews were conducted with five Iranian physicians who perform hymenoplasty to determine their ethical views on the surgery. The interview findings suggest that Iranian physicians risk punitive consequences if they are discovered to be offering hymenoplasty. However, some continue to cautiously perform the procedure out of a moral obligation to protect the welfare of women seeking it, even if they are personally conflicted about the surgery.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/ethics , Hymen/surgery , Physicians/psychology , Plastic Surgery Procedures/ethics , Cultural Characteristics , Female , Humans , Iran/epidemiology , Religion , Sociological Factors
15.
BMC Med Ethics ; 15: 89, 2014 Dec 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25539891

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hymen reconstruction is a controversial measure performed to help young females under threat of honour-related violence. Official guidelines often reject offering hymen reconstructions. On the other hand, extraordinary measures in order to enable operations of Jehovah's Witnesses who want a bloodless operation in order to avoid religiously related sanctions are often considered praiseworthy. The aim is thus to examine whether or not there are relevant differences between these two measures. DISCUSSION: We identified twelve potential differences. One difference could be considered relevant (patient-safety), but in favour of hymenoplastic operations. SUMMARY: Since we did not identify enough relevant differences to justify offering bloodless operations to Jehovah's Witnesses but not offering hymen reconstruction due to honour-related norms, we conclude that these two groups of patients should be treated equally. This means that neither of the patient groups should be offered these extraordinary operations or that both groups of patients should be offered such operations. Similarly, there are no reasons for judging those who perform the operations differently.


Subject(s)
Blood Loss, Surgical , Blood Transfusion , Cultural Characteristics , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/ethics , Hymen/surgery , Islam , Jehovah's Witnesses , Minors , Patient Safety , Plastic Surgery Procedures/ethics , Religion and Medicine , Sexual Abstinence , Family Characteristics , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Participation , Personal Autonomy , Social Values , Violence
17.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 51(3): 199-203, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21631436

ABSTRACT

Uterine transplantation (UTx) aims to treat unconditional uterine factor infertility by replacing a non-functioning or non-existing uterus. After one attempt of UTx in the human 10 years ago, intensive research has been performed. The results of these specific studies on surgical technique, ischaemia-reperfusion injury, immunosuppression and fertility are discussed.


Subject(s)
Uterus/transplantation , Animals , Female , Graft Rejection/immunology , Graft Rejection/therapy , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/ethics , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans , Immunosuppression Therapy , Infertility, Female/surgery , Mice , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Rabbits , Rats , Reperfusion Injury/surgery , Sheep , Swine
19.
Mymensingh Med J ; 19(3): 360-5, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20639827

ABSTRACT

Getting information about disease has been suffering, the management needed, procedure and complication of that management, is the right of the patients. Giving that information to the patients is the responsibility of the physician/surgeons. The objective of this study was to assess the existing awareness of the surgeons and female patients regarding ethical issues of medical practices. This observational study was undertaken in the gynecological department of two tertiary hospital of the capital city of Bangladesh. One hundred fifty five patients were interviewed who were underwent surgical management for different gynecological problems. Mean age of the studied population was 41 (SD+/-10) years. All of them were from lower and lower middle economical classes. Sixty three percents (63%) were illiterate. Consent for the surgery was given by the husband in 52% cases, by son in 22% cases, by herself in 1% case and remaining by other relatives. About 50% of the patients did not know the name of their disease, 75% of them never talked with the surgeon. Only in 31% cases surgeon spontaneously explained them about her disease. Most of them had no knowledge about anaesthesia, operating time, need of blood transfusion, operating complications and long-term effects of the surgery they had. The result of this study showed very poor awareness about medical ethics and patient's right.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/ethics , Informed Consent/ethics , Patient Rights/ethics , Physician-Patient Relations/ethics , Women's Rights/ethics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bangladesh , Disclosure/ethics , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
20.
Sex Med Rev ; 8(4): 542-547, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32694091

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Surgical and other procedures to alter the shape of the female external genitalia, especially the labia minora, are increasingly popular and controversial worldwide. OBJECTIVES: This article aims to delineate and complicate the medical and moral controversy around these vulvoplasty procedures, by describing how female genital aesthetics, their interpretation, and alteration vary over time, space, and culture. METHODS: The history of the Hottentot Venus is used as a pivot about which to consider current biomedical, anthropological, and ethical literatures regarding female genital appearance and its manipulation. Intersectionality describes how different systems influence each other to affect the agency of certain individuals or groups, and is therefore an ideal analytic method for biopsychosocial concerns of sex and informed consent. RESULTS: The 19th century anatomic study and display of Sarah "Saartjie" Baartman, the Hottentot Venus, defined a European vulvar ideal by demonstrating its opposite. Today, the ideal appearance of the labia minora is variable across cultures and nationalities, and various mechanical and surgical manipulations are sought or imposed upon women to bring their bodies into conformity with these ideals. CONCLUSION: For European audiences, Baartman exemplified a stereotypical association between genital appearance, sexual availability, and accessibility as a biomedical subject. These logical linkages were a by-product of sexist, racist, and colonial ideologies that have since fallen out of favor. However, their genital effects continue to influence bioethical considerations of genitoplasty into the present day. Chubak B. Historical and Ethical Perspectives on Vulvoplasty. Sex Med Rev 2020;8:542-547.


Subject(s)
Body Image , Cultural Characteristics , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/ethics , Internationality , Vulva/surgery , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/history , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/legislation & jurisprudence , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/trends , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Humans , Vulva/anatomy & histology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL