Systemic lupus erythematosus with chronic persistent intracranial hypertension: A case report.

OBJECTIVE: The aim is to investigate the clinical characteristics of systemic lupus erythematosus with intracranial hypertension. METHODS: The clinical characteristics of one case of systemic lupus erythematosus with chronic persistent intracranial hypertension were analyzed, and related literature was reviewed by searching Medline and Wanfang databases. RESULTS: Intracranial hypertension in SLE patients may occur at the onset or during the course of the disease. Our patient was diagnosed with IH 3 years after the onset of SLE. Headache and papilledema were the most common symptoms of intracranial hypertension, followed by nausea or vomiting, vision changes, and cerebral palsy. Our patient had a headache and cranial hypertension that lasted for years, but no papilledema was found. Corticosteroid is currently the mainstay of the treatment of IIH in patients with SLE, and immunosuppressive agents, acetazolamide, intravenous mannitol and furosemide are also used. However, our patient did not respond to these treatments and presents the characteristics of chronic persistent intracranial hypertension. CONCLUSION: Systemic lupus erythematosus with intracranial hypertension is a rare manifestation of SLE, which is not completely parallel to SLE activity. Headache and papilledema were the most common presenting symptoms. Different from previous reported cases, our patient had poor response to treatments, showing chronic and persistent characteristics.

Effect of continuous hypertonic saline infusion on clinical outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Osmotic therapy has been recognized as an important treatment option for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Nevertheless, the effect of hypertonic saline (HTS) remains unknown, as findings are primarily based on a large database. This study aimed to elucidate the effect of HTS on the clinical outcomes of patients with TBI admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). We retrospectively identified patients with moderate-to-severe TBI from two public databases: Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV and eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD). A marginal structural Cox model (MSCM) was used, with time-dependent variates designed to reflect exposure over time during ICU stay. Trajectory modeling based on the intracranial pressure evolution pattern allowed for the identification of subgroups. Overall, 130 (6.65%) of 1955 eligible patients underwent HTS. MSCM indicated that the HTS significantly associated with higher infection complications (e.g., urinary tract infection (HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.26-2.81, p = 0.002)) and increased ICU LOS (HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.71-2.40, p < 0.001). A protective effect of HTS on GCS was found in subgroups with medium and low intracranial pressure. Our study revealed no significant difference in mortality between patients who underwent HTS and those who did not. Increased occurrence rates of infection and electrolyte imbalance are inevitable outcomes of continuous HTS infusion. Although the study suggests slight beneficial effects, including better neurological outcomes, these results warrant further validation.

Acute Effects of Ketamine on Intracranial Pressure in Children With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVES: The acute cerebral physiologic effects of ketamine in children have been incompletely described. We assessed the acute effects of ketamine on intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) in children with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: In this retrospective observational study, patients received bolus doses of ketamine for sedation or as a treatment for ICP crisis (ICP > 20 mm Hg for > 5 min). Administration times were synchronized with ICP and CPP recordings at 1-minute intervals logged in an automated database within the electronic health record. ICP and CPP were each averaged in epochs following drug administration and compared with baseline values. Age-based CPP thresholds were subtracted from CPP recordings and compared with baseline values. Trends in ICP and CPP over time were assessed using generalized least squares regression. SETTING: A 30-bed tertiary care children's hospital PICU. PATIENTS: Children with severe TBI who underwent ICP monitoring. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We analyzed data from 33 patients, ages 1 month to 16 years, 22 of whom received bolus doses of ketamine, with 127 doses analyzed. Demographics, patient, and injury characteristics were similar between patients who did versus did not receive ketamine boluses. In analysis of the subset of ketamine doses used only for sedation, there was no significant difference in ICP or CPP from baseline. Eighteen ketamine doses were given during ICP crises in 11 patients. ICP decreased following these doses and threshold-subtracted CPP rose. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective, exploratory study, ICP did not increase following ketamine administration. In the setting of a guidelines-based protocol, ketamine was associated with a reduction in ICP during ICP crises. If these findings are reproduced in a larger study, ketamine may warrant consideration as a treatment for intracranial hypertension in children with severe TBI.

Cryptococcal meningoencephalitis with Actinomyces odontolyticus sepsis: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: The combined infection of actinomyces odontolyticus sepsis and cryptococcal encephalitis is rare in routine clinical practice. Thus, we presented this case report and literature review to provide clues to improve such patients' diagnoses and treatment processes. CASE PRESENTATION: The main clinical manifestations of the patient were high fever and intracranial hypertension. Then, we completed the routine cerebrospinal fluid examination, biochemical detection, cytological examination, bacterial culture, and India ink staining. Firstly, the blood culture suggested actinomyces odontolyticus infection, considering the possibility of actinomyces odontolyticus sepsis and intracranial actinomyces odontolyticus infection. Accordingly, the patient was administered penicillin for treatment. Although the fever was slightly relieved, the symptoms of intracranial hypertension did not relieve. After 7 days, the characteristics of brain magnetic resonance imaging and the results of pathogenic metagenomics sequencing and cryptococcal capsular polysaccharide antigen suggested that cryptococcal infection. Based on the above results, the patient was diagnosed with a combined infection of cryptococcal meningoencephalitis and actinomyces odontolyticus sepsis. Anti-infection therapy with 'penicillin, amphotericin, and fluconazole' was provided, improving the clinical manifestations and objective indexes. CONCLUSION: The combined infection of Actinomyces odontolyticus sepsis and cryptococcal encephalitis is first reported in this case report, and combined antibiotics with 'penicillin, amphotericin, and fluconazole' are effective.

A Rare Report of the Coexistence of Sickle Cell Disease, Neurofibromatosis Type 1, and Intracranial Hypertension in a Pediatric Patient.

A pediatric female with sickle cell disease (SCD) and neurofibromatosis type 1 was noted to have incidental papilledema, with subsequent workup showing an elevated opening pressure. She was diagnosed with intracranial hypertension and began treatment with acetazolamide. Hydroxyurea was also discontinued. Acetazolamide was tapered off, and hydroxyurea was restarted with no worsening in her ophthalmologic exam. We report this case due to the rare occurrence of all 3 conditions, and while intracranial hypertension has been reported in SCD, the diagnostic workup for papilledema in hemoglobinopathies is not well defined. This case helps delineate the presentation and diagnostic workup of papilledema in SCD.

Safety of peripheral 3% hypertonic saline bolus administration for neurologic emergency.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Hypertonic sodium chloride (HTS) is used for emergent treatment of acute cerebral edema and other neurologic emergencies. Central access is not commonly available in emergent situations and 3% HTS is utilized peripherally. Many studies have shown the safety of its administration at rates up to 75 mL/h, but there is a lack of data to establish the safety of peripherally administered, rapid bolus dosing in emergent situations. The objective of this study is to describe the safety of rapid, peripherally administered (≥ 250 mL/h) 3% HTS for neurologic emergencies. METHODS: This is a retrospective, cohort study including adult patients receiving 3% HTS via a peripheral IV site for elevated intracranial pressure, cerebral edema, or other neurological emergencies at a rate of at least 250 m/h between May 5, 2018 - September 30, 2021. Patients were excluded if they simultaneously received another hypertonic saline fluid. Baseline characteristics collected included HTS dose, rate and site of administration, indication for use and patient demographics. The primary safety outcome was incidence of extravasation and phlebitis within one hour of HTS administration. RESULTS: There were 206 patients receiving 3% HTS who were screened, and 37 patients met inclusion criteria. The most common reason for exclusion was administration at a rate < 250 m/h. The median age was 60 (IQR 45, 72) with 51.4% being male. The most common indications for HTS were traumatic brain injury (45.9%) and intracranial hemorrhage (37.8%). The most common administration location was the emergency department (78.4%). The median IV-gauge (n = 29) was 18 (IQR 18, 20), with the most common placement site being antecubital (48.6%). The median dose of HTS was 250 mL (IQR 250, 350), with a median administration rate of 760 mL/h (IQR 500, 999). There were no episodes of extravasation or phlebitis noted. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid, peripheral administration of 3% HTS boluses is a safe alternative for treatment of neurologic emergencies. Administration at rates up to 999 mL/h did not result in extravasation or phlebitis.

Co-administration of Ketamine in Pediatric Patients with Neurologic Conditions at Risk for Intracranial Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Ketamine has traditionally been avoided as an induction agent for tracheal intubation in patients with neurologic conditions at risk for intracranial hypertension due to conflicting data in the literature. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of ketamine versus other medications as the primary induction agent on peri-intubation neurologic, hemodynamic and respiratory associated events in pediatric patients with neurologic conditions at risk for intracranial hypertension. METHODS: This retrospective observational study enrolled patients < 18 years of age at risk for intracranial hypertension who were admitted to a quaternary children's hospital between 2015 and 2020. Associated events included neurologic, hemodynamic and respiratory outcomes comparing primary induction agents of ketamine versus non-ketamine for tracheal intubation. RESULTS: Of 143 children, 70 received ketamine as the primary induction agent prior to tracheal intubation. Subsequently after tracheal intubation, all the patients received adjunct analgesic and sedative medications (fentanyl, midazolam, and/or propofol) at doses that were inadequate to induce general anesthesia but would keep them comfortable for further diagnostic workup. There were no significant differences between associated neurologic events in the ketamine versus non-ketamine groups (p = 0.42). This included obtaining an emergent computed tomography scan (p = 0.28), an emergent trip to the operating room within 5 h of tracheal intubation (p = 0.6), and the need for hypertonic saline administration within 15 min of induction drug administration for tracheal intubation (p = 0.51). There were two patients who had clinical and imaging evidence of herniation, which was not more adversely affected by ketamine compared with other medications (p = 0.49). Of the 143 patients, 23 had pre-intubation and post-intubation intracranial pressure values recorded; 11 received ketamine, and 3 of these patients had intracranial hypertension that resolved or improved, whereas the remaining 8 children had intracranial pressure within the normal range that was not exacerbated by ketamine. There were no significant differences in overall associated hemodynamic or respiratory events during tracheal intubation and no 24-h mortality in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of ketamine as the primary induction agent prior to tracheal intubation in combination with other agents after tracheal intubation in children at risk for intracranial hypertension was not associated with an increased risk of peri-intubation associated neurologic, hemodynamic or respiratory events compared with those who received other induction agents.

Mannitol Is Comparable to Hypertonic Saline for Raised Intracranial Pressure in Acute Liver Failure (MAHAL Study): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Raised intracranial pressure (ICP) due to cerebral edema (CE) is central to development of hepatic encephalopathy in acute liver failure (ALF). Mannitol (MT) and hypertonic saline (HS) have been shown to improve CE. We compared the efficacy and safety of the 2 modalities. METHODS: ALF with CE was prospectively randomized in an open study to receive either 5 mL/kg of either 3% HS, as continuous infusion; titrated every 6 hourly to achieve serum sodium of <160 (Group A; n = 26) or 1 g/kg of 20% MN as a IV bolus, repeated every 6 hourly (Group B; n = 25) in addition to standard ALF care. Primary end-point was reduction of ICP defined as optic nerve sheath diameter <5 mm and middle cerebral arterial pulsatility index <1.2 at 12 h. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients with ALF, hepatitis E being commonest (33.3%), median jaundice to HE interval of 8 (1-16) days, were randomized to HS (n = 26) or MN (n = 25). Baseline characteristics were comparable including King's college criteria (>2: 38.4% vs.40%). Overall, 61.5% patients in the HS and 56% in the MN group showed reduction in ICP at 12 h (p = 0.25). Rebound increase in ICP indices was noted in 5 (20%) patients in MT and none in HS (p < 0.05) group. New onset acute kidney injury was common in the MT group than in the HS group. The ICU stay and 28-day transplant-free survival were not different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: While both agents had comparable efficacy in reducing ICP and mortality in ALF patients was comparable, HS was significantly better in preventing reducing rebound CE with lower renal dysfunction.

Clinical effects of hypertonic saline boluses in children with severe traumatic brain injury.

AIM: To quantify the effects of 3% hypertonic saline (HTS) boluses on intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) in children. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients admitted to a regional neurosurgical children's intensive care unit. RESULTS: A total of 156 HTS boluses were given to children with traumatic brain injury. ICP decreased 6 mmHg (P < 0.01) and CPP increased 4 mmHg (P = 0.003) 1-h post-bolus. Effects persisted for 3 h post-dose ICP was 5 mmHg lower) and 4 h post-bolus CPP was 3 mmHg higher. ICP change was not associated with pre-bolus serum sodium concentration. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertonic saline 3% at 5 mL/kg is an effective osmolar therapy for reducing ICP and increasing CPP in children for up to 3 h. '53-53' is a suitable guide - 5 mL/kg of 3% HTS will on average decrease ICP by at least 5 mmHg for 3 h. Pre-bolus serum sodium concentration is not correlated with effect size.

Improved Pressure Equalization Ratio Following Mannitol Administration in Patients With Severe TBI: A Preliminary Study of a Potential Bedside Marker for Response to Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Performing a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage challenge can be used to measure the pressure equalization (PE) ratio, which describes the extent to which CSF drainage can equalize pressure to the height of the external ventricular drain and may serve as a correlate of cerebral edema. We sought to assess whether treatment with mannitol improves PE ratio in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). METHODS: We studied consecutive patients with TBI and brain edema on computed tomography scan and an external ventricular drain (EVD), admitted to the neurointensive care unit. PE ratio, defined as ICP prior to CSF drainage minus ICP after CSF drainage divided by ICP prior to CSF drainage minus EVD height, was measured as previously described. Patients were treated with mannitol for raised ICP based on clinical indication and PE ratio measured before and after mannitol administration. RESULTS: We studied 20 patients with severe TBI with raised ICP. Mean ICP prior to mannitol treatment was 29 ± 7 mm Hg. PE ratio rose substantially after mannitol treatment (0.62 ± 0.24 vs. 0.29 ± 0.20, p < 0.0001), indicating an improved ability to drain CSF and equalize ICP with the preset height of the EVD. The combination of mannitol and CSF drainage led to an improved reduction in ICP compared with that seen before mannitol therapy (11 ± 2 mm Hg vs. 6 ± 2 mm Hg, p < 0.01), and led to a decrease in ICP below the 20 mm Hg threshold in 77% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with mannitol leads to a substantial improvement in PE ratio that reflects the ability to achieve a greater decrease in ICP when CSF drainage is performed after mannitol administration. This preliminary study raises the possibility that PE ratio may be useful to follow response to therapy in patients with cerebral edema and raised ICP. Further studies to determine whether PE ratio may serve as an easily obtained and clinically useful surrogate marker for the extent of brain edema are warranted.

Acute Intracranial Hypertension During Pregnancy: Special Considerations and Management Adjustments.

Pregnancy is associated with a number of pathophysiological changes (including modification of vascular resistance, increased vascular permeability, and coagulative disorders) that can lead to specific (eclampsia, preeclampsia) or not specific (intracranial hemorrhage) neurological complications. In addition to these disorders, pregnancy can affect numerous preexisting neurologic conditions, including epilepsy, brain tumors, and intracerebral bleeding from cerebral aneurysm or arteriovenous malformations. Intracranial complications related to pregnancy can expose patients to a high risk of intracranial hypertension (IHT). Unfortunately, at present, the therapeutic measures that are generally adopted for the control of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in the general population have not been examined in pregnant patients, and their efficacy and safety for the mother and the fetus is still unknown. In addition, no specific guidelines for the application of the staircase approach, including escalating treatments with increasing intensity of level, for the management of IHT exist for this population. Although some of basic measures can be considered safe even in pregnant patients (management of stable hemodynamic and respiratory function, optimization of systemic physiology), some other interventions, such as hyperventilation, osmotic therapy, hypothermia, barbiturates, and decompressive craniectomy, can lead to specific concerns for the safety of both mother and fetus. The aim of this review is to summarize the neurological pathophysiological changes occurring during pregnancy and explore the effects of the possible therapeutic interventions applied to the general population for the management of IHT during pregnancy, taking into consideration ethical and clinical concerns as well as the decision for the timing of treatment and delivery.

Salted or sweet? Hypertonic saline or mannitol for treatment of intracranial hypertension.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this review article is to present current recommendations regarding the use of hypertonic saline and mannitol for the treatment of intracranial hypertension. RECENT FINDINGS: In recent years, a significant number of studies have been published comparing hypertonic saline with mannitol in patients with acute increased intracranial pressure, mostly caused by traumatic brain injury. Albeit several randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analysis support hypertonic saline as more effective than mannitol in reducing intracranial pressure, no clear benefit in regards to the long-term neurologic outcome of these patients has been reported. SUMMARY: Identifying and treating increased intracranial pressure is imperative in neurocritical care settings and proper management is essential to improve long-term outcomes. Currently, there is insufficient evidence from comparative studies to support a formal recommendation on the use of any specific hyperosmolar medication in patients with acute increased intracranial pressure.

23.4% Sodium Chloride Versus Mannitol for the Reduction of Intracranial Pressure in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Intermittent doses of mannitol or hypertonic saline are recommended to treat elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). However, it is unclear if one agent is more effective than the other. Previous studies have compared mannitol and hypertonic saline in reduction of ICP, with conflicting results. However, no study thus far has compared 23.4% sodium chloride with mannitol. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the difference in absolute reduction of ICP 60 minutes after infusion of 23.4% sodium chloride versus mannitol. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study that included patients at least 16 years old admitted to the trauma/surgical intensive care unit between August 8, 2016, and August 30, 2018, who received either 23.4% sodium chloride 30 mL and/or mannitol 0.5 g/kg and had an ICP monitor or external ventricular drain in place. The primary outcome was absolute reduction in ICP 60 minutes after infusion of hyperosmolar therapy. RESULTS: In all, 31 patients and 162 doses of hyperosmolar therapy were included in the analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary end point of absolute reduction of ICP 60 minutes after infusion of hyperosmolar therapy comparing 23.4% sodium chloride 30 mL with 0.5 g/kg mannitol (P = 0.2929). There was no statistically significant difference found for any secondary end points. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: No difference was found for absolute reduction of ICP at 30, 60, and 120 minutes, respectively, after infusion of hyperosmolar agent or time to next elevated ICP. Patient-specific parameters should be used to guide the choice of hyperosmolar agent to be administered.

Use and impact of high intensity treatments in patients with traumatic brain injury across Europe: a CENTER-TBI analysis.

PURPOSE: To study variation in, and clinical impact of high Therapy Intensity Level (TIL) treatments for elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) across European Intensive Care Units (ICUs). METHODS: We studied high TIL treatments (metabolic suppression, hypothermia (< 35 °C), intensive hyperventilation (PaCO2 < 4 kPa), and secondary decompressive craniectomy) in patients receiving ICP monitoring in the ICU stratum of the CENTER-TBI study. A random effect logistic regression model was used to determine between-centre variation in their use. A propensity score-matched model was used to study the impact on outcome (6-months Glasgow Outcome Score-extended (GOSE)), whilst adjusting for case-mix severity, signs of brain herniation on imaging, and ICP. RESULTS: 313 of 758 patients from 52 European centres (41%) received at least one high TIL treatment with significant variation between centres (median odds ratio = 2.26). Patients often transiently received high TIL therapies without escalation from lower tier treatments. 38% of patients with high TIL treatment had favourable outcomes (GOSE ≥ 5). The use of high TIL treatment was not significantly associated with worse outcome (285 matched pairs, OR 1.4, 95% CI [1.0-2.0]). However, a sensitivity analysis excluding high TIL treatments at day 1 or use of metabolic suppression at any day did reveal a statistically significant association with worse outcome. CONCLUSION: Substantial between-centre variation in use of high TIL treatments for TBI was found and treatment escalation to higher TIL treatments were often not preceded by more conventional lower TIL treatments. The significant association between high TIL treatments after day 1 and worse outcomes may reflect aggressive use or unmeasured confounders or inappropriate escalation strategies. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Substantial variation was found in the use of highly intensive ICP-lowering treatments across European ICUs and a stepwise escalation strategy from lower to higher intensity level therapy is often lacking. Further research is necessary to study the impact of high therapy intensity treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The core study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02210221, registered 08/06/2014, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02210221?id=NCT02210221&draw=1&rank=1 and with Resource Identification Portal (RRID: SCR_015582).

Comparative efficacy and safety of glycerol versus mannitol in patients with cerebral oedema and elevated intracranial pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Glycerol is thought to be superior to mannitol in the treatment of cerebral oedema and elevated intracranial pressure (ICP), particularly with safety concerns. However, the current evidence remains insufficient. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of glycerol versus mannitol in this meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, Chongqing VIP information, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the reference lists of relevant articles were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing glycerol and mannitol in patients with brain oedema and elevated ICP. Two investigators independently identified the articles, assessed the study quality and extracted data. Data analyses were performed using RevMan software. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Thirty trials involving 3144 patients met our inclusion criteria. Pooled data indicated that glycerol and mannitol had comparable effectiveness in controlling cerebral oedema (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.03; p = .97), but the risks of acute kidney injury and electrolyte disturbances were significantly lower with glycerol (RR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.27 and RR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.30, respectively) than mannitol. Moreover, there seemed to be a lower probability of rebound ICP after the withdrawal of glycerol. Neither haemolysis nor elevated blood glucose levels were observed in the glycerol group. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Regarding the balance between efficacy and safety, glycerol could be an effective and more tolerable alternative therapy for cerebral oedema and elevated ICP than mannitol, especially for high-risk populations of renal failure.

Temporal effects of barbiturate coma on intracranial pressure and compensatory reserve in children with traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to study the effects of barbiturate coma treatment (BCT) on intracranial pressure (ICP) and intracranial compensatory reserve (RAP index) in children (< 17 years of age) with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and refractory intracranial hypertension (RICH). METHODS: High-resolution monitoring data were used to study the effects of BCT on ICP, mean arterial pressure (MAP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and RAP index. Four half hour long periods were studied: before bolus injection and at 5, 10, and 24 hours thereafter, respectively, and a fifth tapering period with S-thiopental between < 100 and < 30 µmol/L. S-thiopental concentrations and administered doses were registered. RESULTS: Seventeen children treated with BCT 2007-2017 with high-resolution data were included; median age 15 (range 6-17) and median Glasgow coma score 7 (range 3-8). Median time from trauma to start of BCT was 44.5 h (range 2.5-197.5) and from start to stop 99.0 h (range 21.0-329.0). Median ICP was 22 (IQR 20-25) in the half hour period before onset of BCT and 16 (IQR 11-20) in the half hour period 5 h later (p = 0.011). The corresponding figures for CPP were 65 (IQR 62-71) and 63 (57-71) (p > 0.05). The RAP index was in the half hour period before onset of BCT 0.6 (IQR 0.1-0.7), in the half hour period 5 h later 0.3 (IQR 0.1-0.7) (p = 0.331), and in the whole BCT period 0.3 (IQR 0.2-0.4) (p = 0.004). Eighty-two percent (14/17) had favorable outcome (good recovery = 8 patients and moderate disability = 6 patients). CONCLUSION: BCT significantly reduced ICP and RAP index with preserved CPP. BCT should be considered in case of RICH.

Comparison of half-molar sodium lactate and mannitol to treat brain edema in severe traumatic brain injury: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: Hypertonic fluids such as mannitol and half-molar sodium lactate are given to treat intracranial hypertension in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). In this study, sodium lactate was compared to mannitol in patients with TBI to investigate the efficacy in reducing intracranial pressure (ICP). METHODS: This study was a systematic review with literature research on articles published in any year in the databases of PubMed, ScienceDirect, Asian Journal of Neurosurgery, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The keywords were "half-molar sodium lactate", "mannitol", "cerebral edema or brain swelling", and "severe traumatic brain injury". The inclusion criteria were (1) studies published in English, (2) randomized control trials or retrospective/prospective studies on TBI patients, and (3) therapies including half-molar sodium lactate and mannitol and (4) sufficient data such as mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR). Data analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: From 1499 studies, a total of 8 studies were eligible. Mannitol group reduced ICP of 0.65 times (MD 0.65; p = 0.64) and improved cerebral perfusion pressure of 0.61 times (MD 0.61; p = 0.88), better than the half-molar group of sodium lactate. But the half-molar group of sodium lactate maintained the mean arterial pressure level of 0.86 times, better than the mannitol group (MD 0.86; p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: Half-molar sodium lactate is as effective as mannitol in reducing ICP in the early phase of brain injury, superior over mannitol in an extended period. It is able to prevent intracranial hypertension and give better brain tissue perfusion as well as more stable hemodynamics. Blood osmolarity is a concern as it increases serum sodium.

Triple therapy combined with ventriculoperitoneal shunts can improve neurological function and shorten hospitalization time in non-HIV cryptococcal meningitis patients with increased intracranial pressure.

BACKGROUND: Raised intracranial pressure (ICP) and insufficient antifungal regimens are the two main factors result to unsatisfactory outcomes in non-HIV cryptococcal meningitis (CM) patients. In this study, we try to discuss that whether triple therapy of amphotericin B (AmB), fluconazole, 5-flucytosine (5-FC) plus ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPS) is superior to AmB, 5-FC, fluconazole plus intermittent lumbar puncture in induction therapy in non-HIV CM patients with increased ICP. METHODS: We reviewed 66 clinical records from non-HIV CM patients with increased ICP. The demographic and clinical characteristics, BMRC staging, cerebrospinal fluid profiles (CSF), brain magnetic resonance imaging, treatment, and outcomes of these individuals were retrospectively analyzed. All non-HIV CM patients with increased ICP (≥ 25 cmH2O) were divided into two groups, including 27 patients treated with triple antifungal agents and 39 patients treated with the same triple therapy plus VPS. RESULTS: Triple therapy plus VPS group had more satisfactory outcomes, more CSF sterilization at 10 weeks follow-up, lower CSF opening pressure, lower BMRC staging scores one week after VPS, less CSF C. neoformans counts and CSF culture positive. Besides, these patients had shorter hospital stay than triple therapy group. CONCLUSIONS: Triple antifungal agents combined with VPS could effectively reduce ICP, had faster rate of clearance of C. neoformans counts, more improved neurological function, shorten hospitalization time and better outcomes in non-HIV CM patients with increased ICP. Our study indicated that triple therapy plus early VPS may be an optimal treatment for non-HIV CM patients with increased ICP.

Standardized Volume Dosing Protocol of 23.4% Hypertonic Saline for Pediatric Critical Care: Initial Experience.

Background: Standardized volume dosing of 23.4% hypertonic saline (HTS) exists for adults, but the concentration, dosing and administration of HTS in pediatrics is variable. With emerging pediatric experience of 23.4% HTS, a standard volume dose approach may be helpful. Objective: To describe initial experience with a standardized 23.4% HTS weight-based volume dosing protocol of 10, 20, or 30 mL in the pediatric intensive care unit. Methods: Standard volume doses of 23.4% HTS were developed from weight dosing equivalents of 3% HTS. Pre and post sodium and intracranial pressure (ICP) measurements were compared with paired t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The site of administration and complications were noted. Results: A total of 16 pediatric patients received 37 doses of 23.4% HTS, with the smallest patient weighing 11 kg. For protocol compliance, 17 doses (46%) followed recommended dosing, 19 were less volume than recommended (51%), and 1 dose (3%) was more than recommended. Mean increase in sodium was 3.5 mEq/L (95% CI = 2-5 mEq/L); P < 0.0001. The median decrease in ICP was 10.5 mm Hg (interquartile range [IQR] 8.3-19.5) for a 37% (IQR 25%-64%) reduction. Most doses were administered through central venous access, although peripheral intravenous administrations occurred in 4 patients without complication. Conclusion and Relevance: Three standard-volume dose options of 23.4% HTS based on weight increases sodium and reduces ICP in pediatric patients. Standard-volume doses may simplify weight-based dosing, storage and administration for pediatric emergencies, although the optimum dose, and safety of 23.4% HTS in children remains unknown.

Hypertonic saline versus other intracranial pressure-lowering agents for people with acute traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Increased intracranial pressure has been shown to be strongly associated with poor neurological outcomes and mortality for patients with acute traumatic brain injury. Currently, most efforts to treat these injuries focus on controlling the intracranial pressure. Hypertonic saline is a hyperosmolar therapy that is used in traumatic brain injury to reduce intracranial pressure. The effectiveness of hypertonic saline compared with other intracranial pressure-lowering agents in the management of acute traumatic brain injury is still debated, both in the short and the long term. OBJECTIVES: To assess the comparative efficacy and safety of hypertonic saline versus other intracranial pressure-lowering agents in the management of acute traumatic brain injury. SEARCH METHODS: We searched Cochrane Injuries' Specialised Register, CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase Classic+Embase, ISI Web of Science: Science Citation Index and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science, as well as trials registers, on 11 December 2019. We supplemented these searches with searches of four major Chinese databases on 19 September 2018. We also checked bibliographies, and contacted trial authors to identify additional trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We sought to identify all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of hypertonic saline versus other intracranial pressure-lowering agents for people with acute traumatic brain injury of any severity. We excluded cross-over trials as incompatible with assessing long-term outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened search results to identify potentially eligible trials and extracted data using a standard data extraction form. Outcome measures included: mortality at end of follow-up (all-cause); death or disability (as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS)); uncontrolled intracranial pressure (defined as failure to decrease the intracranial pressure to target and/or requiring additional intervention); and adverse events e.g. rebound phenomena; pulmonary oedema; acute renal failure during treatment). MAIN RESULTS: Six trials, involving data from 287 people, met the inclusion criteria. The majority of participants (91%) had a diagnosis of severe traumatic brain injury. We had concerns about particular domains of risk of bias in each trial, as physicians were not reliably blinded to allocation, two trials contained participants with conditions other than traumatic brain injury and in one trial, we had concerns about missing data for important outcomes. The original protocol was available for only one trial and other trials (where registered) were registered retrospectively. Meta-analysis for both the primary outcome (mortality at final follow-up) and for 'poor outcome' as per conventionally dichotomised GOS criteria, was only possible for two trials. Synthesis of long-term outcomes was inhibited by the fact that two trials ceased data collection within two hours of a single bolus dose of an intracranial pressure-lowering agent and one at discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU). Only three trials collected data after participants were released from hospital, one of which did not report mortality and reported a 'poor outcome' by GOS criteria in an unconventional way. Substantial missing data in a key trial meant that in meta-analysis we report 'best-case' and 'worst-case' estimates alongside available case analysis. In no scenario did we discern a clear difference between treatments for either mortality or poor neurological outcome. Due to variation in modes of drug administration (including whether it followed or did not follow cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage, as well as different follow-up times and ways of reporting changes in intracranial pressure, as well as no uniform definition of 'uncontrolled intracranial pressure', we did not perform meta-analysis for this outcome and report results narratively, by individual trial. Trials tended to report both treatments to be effective in reducing elevated intracranial pressure but that hypertonic saline had increased benefits, usually adding that pretreatment factors need to be considered (e.g. serum sodium and both system and brain haemodynamics). No trial provided data for our other outcomes of interest. We consider evidence quality for all outcomes to be very low, as assessed by GRADE; we downgraded all conclusions due to imprecision (small sample size), indirectness (due to choice of measurement and/or selection of participants without traumatic brain injury), and in some cases, risk of bias and inconsistency. Only one of the included trials reported data on adverse effects; a rebound phenomenon, which was present only in the comparator group (mannitol). None of the trials reported data on pulmonary oedema or acute renal failure during treatment. On the whole, trial authors do not seem to have rigorously sought to collect data on adverse events. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review set out to find trials comparing hypertonic saline to a potential range of other intracranial pressure-lowering agents, but only identified trials comparing it with mannitol or mannitol in combination with glycerol. Based on limited data, there is weak evidence to suggest that hypertonic saline is no better than mannitol in efficacy and safety in the long-term management of acute traumatic brain injury. Future research should be comprised of large, multi-site trials, prospectively registered, reported in accordance with current best practice. Trials should investigate issues such as the type of traumatic brain injury suffered by participants and concentration of infusion and length of time over which the infusion is given.