Applications of topical immunomodulators enhance clinical signs of vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) and atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC): a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aimed to review the safety and efficacy of topical cyclosporine A (CsA) and topical tacrolimus in allergic eye disease. METHODS: A systematic search identified thirteen studies and a total of 445 patients for inclusion, making this the largest meta-analysis published on the subject. The current review was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). RESULTS: Thirteen randomized control trials were included in the meta-analysis. Eleven studies used CsA as the treatment, and two used Tacrolimus. In total, 445 participants were included, of whom 76.6% were male. The mean age of participants across the included studies was 14 years. All studies reported clinical signs as evaluated by an examining clinician. Signs were usually assessed by anatomical region, with the most common regions being the conjunctiva and the cornea, and the most common signs assessed were hyperemia and papillae. Three studies accounted for more than 50% of the meta-analysis's weight. Effect size (d) ranged from - 2.37 to - 0.03, negative values favoring immunomodulators. Fixed Effect Meta-Analysis returned an SMD of - 0.81 (95% CI [- 0.98, - 0.65]). However, there was significant heterogeneity (I2 = 61%, Qw = 30.76) in the outcome measure (P = 0.0021); therefore, a random-effect meta-analysis was also completed in which the pooled SMD was - 0.98 (95% CI [- 1.26, - 0.69], τ2 = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: This study affirms the current scientific community's stance that immunomodulators effectively treat clinical signs, including blepharitis, conjunctival hyperemia, edema, papillae, and corneal damage in severe ocular allergic disease.

In Vitro efficacy of cyclosporine a and various antiseptics and antiviral drugs on adenovirus genotype 8, a common cause of epidemic keratoconjunctivitis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the in vitro efficacy of cidofovir, ganciclovir, povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine, and cyclosporine A on adenovirus genotype 8. METHODS: Conjunctival samples were collected from patients with adenoviral conjunctivitis and cultured in A549 cells. Adenovirus diagnosis was confirmed by RT-PCR. For each drug, the 50% cytotoxic concentration (CC 50 ) was determined. Subsequently, the antiviral activity was tested at concentrations below CC 50, and the 50% inhibitor concentration (IC 50 ) of drugs was determined RESULTS: While the IC 50 of cidofovir against adenovirus genotype 8 was 3.07 ± 0.8 µM, ganciclovir, povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine, and cyclosporine A were not found to be effective against adenovirus genotype 8 at concentrations below the CC 50 value. CONCLUSIONS: Cidofovir was found effective and the IC 50 value was within the ranges in the literature. Ganciclovir and cyclosporine A were found to be ineffective at doses below the cytotoxic dose, povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine was found to be highly cytotoxic.

Topical pharmacologic interventions versus placebo for epidemic keratoconjunctivitis.

BACKGROUND: Viruses cause about 80% of all cases of acute conjunctivitis. Human adenoviruses are believed to account for 65% to 90% of cases of viral conjunctivitis, or 20% to 75% of all causes of infectious keratoconjunctivitis worldwide. Epidemic keratoconjunctivitis (EKC) is a highly contagious subset of adenoviral conjunctivitis that has been associated with large outbreaks at military installations and at medical facilities. It is accompanied by severe conjunctival inflammation, watery discharge, and light sensitivity, and can lead to chronic complications such as corneal and conjunctival scarring with discomfort and poor quality of vision. Due to a lack of consensus on the efficacy of any pharmacotherapy to alter the clinical course of EKC, no standard of care exists, therefore many clinicians offer only supportive care. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of topical pharmacological therapies versus placebo, an active control, or no treatment for adults with EKC. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; 2021, Issue 4); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences database (LILACS); ClinicalTrials.gov; and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), with no restrictions on language or year of publication. The date of the last search was 27 April 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials in which antiseptic agents, virustatic agents, or topical immune-modulating therapy was compared with placebo, an active control, or no treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodology. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 10 studies conducted in Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa with a total of 892 participants who were treated for 7 days to 6 months and followed for 7 days up to 1.5 years. Study characteristics and risk of bias In most studies participants were predominantly men (range: 44% to 90%), with an age range from 9 to 82 years. Three studies reported information on trial registration, but we found no published study protocol. The majority of trials had small sample sizes, ranging from 18 to 90 participants enrolled per study; the only exception was a trial that enrolled 350 participants. We judged most studies to be at high or unclear risk of bias across risk of bias domains. Findings We included 10 studies of 892 EKC participants and estimated combined intervention effects in analyses stratified by steroid-containing control treatment or artificial tears. Six trials contributed to the comparisons of topical interventions (povidone-iodine [PVP-I], trifluridine, ganciclovir, dexamethasone plus neomycin) with artificial tears (or saline). Very low certainty evidence from two trials comparing trifluridine or ganciclovir with artificial tears showed inconsistent effects on shortening the mean duration of cardinal symptoms or signs of EKC. Low certainty evidence based on two studies (409 participants) indicated that participants treated with PVP-I alone more often experienced resolution of symptoms (risk ratio (RR) 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 1.24) and signs (RR 3.19, 95% CI 2.29 to 4.45) during the first week of treatment compared with those treated with artificial tears. Very low certainty evidence from two studies (77 participants) suggested that PVP-I or ganciclovir prevented the development of subepithelial infiltrates (SEI) when compared with artificial tears within 30 days of treatment (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.56). Four studies compared topical interventions (tacrolimus, cyclosporin A [CsA], trifluridine, PVP-I + dexamethasone) with topical steroids, and one trial compared fluorometholone (FML) plus polyvinyl alcohol iodine (PVA-I) with FML plus levofloxacin. Evidence from one trial showed that more eyes receiving PVP-I 1.0% plus dexamethasone 0.1% had symptoms resolved by day seven compared with those receiving dexamethasone alone (RR 9.00, 95% CI 1.23 to 66.05; 52 eyes). In two trials, fewer eyes treated with PVP-I or PVA-I plus steroid developed SEI within 15 days of treatment compared with steroid alone or steroid plus levofloxacin (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.55; 69 eyes). One study found that CsA was no more effective than steroid for resolving SEI within four weeks of treatment (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.06; N = 88). The evidence from trials comparing topical interventions with steroids was overall of very low level certainty. Adverse effects Antiviral or antimicrobial agents plus steroid did not differ from artificial tears in terms of ocular discomfort upon instillation (RR 9.23, 95% CI 0.61 to 140.67; N = 19). CsA and tacrolimus eye drops were associated with more cases of severe ocular discomfort, and sometimes intolerance, when compared with steroids (RR 4.64, 95% CI 1.15 to 18.71; 2 studies; N = 141). Compared with steroids, tacrolimus did not increase the risk of elevated intraocular pressure (RR 0.07, 95% CI 0 to 1.13; 1 study; N = 80), while trifluridine conferred no additional risk compared to tear substitute (RR 5.50, 95% CI 0.31 to 96.49; 1 study; N = 97). Overall, bacterial superinfection was rare (one in 23 CsA users) and not associated with use of the intervention steroid (RR 3.63, 95% CI 0.15 to 84.98; N = 51). The evidence for all estimates was of low or very low certainty. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence for the seven specified outcomes was of low or very low certainty due to imprecision and high risk of bias. The evidence that antiviral agents shorten the duration of symptoms or signs when compared with artificial tears was inconclusive. Low certainty evidence suggests that PVP-I alone resolves signs and symptoms by seven days relative to artificial tears. PVP-I or PVA-I, alone or with steroid, is associated with lower risks of SEI development than artificial tears or steroid (very low certainty evidence). The currently available evidence is insufficient to determine whether any of the evaluated interventions confers an advantage over steroids or artificial tears with respect to virus eradication or its spread to initially uninvolved fellow eyes. Future updates of this review should provide evidence of high-level certainty from trials with larger sample sizes, enrollment of participants with similar durations of signs and symptoms, and validated methods to assess short- and long-term outcomes.

Epidemic keratoconjunctivitis: efficacy of outbreak management.

PURPOSE: Epidemic keratoconjunctivitis (EKC) is one of the most severe ocular viral infections. The aim of this interruptive time series study was to quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of a hygienic EKC outbreak management concept developed in our ophthalmological department. METHODS: All patients with suspected EKC in the period from August to November 2018 were included in the study. Data were retrospectively collected from the patient's medical documents and records. The disease was diagnosed clinically and confirmed by virus detection through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from conjunctival swabs. With the beginning of the epidemic, an outbreak management plan was implemented to reduce the nosocomial spread. RESULTS: The outbreak lasted 77 days (20th August 2018 to 4th November 2018) and affected a total of 120 patients. This corresponds to a mean of 1.5 patients per outbreak day. The median age was 58 [1-92] years. Of all patients, 61 (50.8%) were female. Conjunctival swabs were collected in 100/120 (83.3%) cases, the adenovirus being detected in all positive smears (63/63, 100%). The implementation of our outbreak management plan reduced significantly the number of EKC cases per outbreak day and resulted in a reduction of the basic reproduction number by a factor of 2.2. CONCLUSION: The detection of EKC together with the immediate implementation of hygienic outbreak measures can significantly reduce the spread of infection. The implementation of a strict outbreak management concept can significantly reduce the number of EKC cases, thus avoiding possible complications and therefore unnecessary health-related costs.

Successful treatment of severe recalcitrant vernal keratoconjunctivitis and atopic dermatitis associated with elevated IgE levels with omalizumab.

We report the clinical case of an atopic patient with important manifestations impacting the quality of life at the cutaneous and ocular site. The condition resisted conventional treatments, and omalizumab had to be used to treat the disease successfully.

Treating Severe Pediatric Keratoconjunctivitis with Topical Cyclosporine A. / Behandlung der chronischen Keratokonjunktivitis im Kindesalter mit topischem Ciclosporin A.

The incidence of chronic keratoconjunctivitis, which potentially causes long-term loss of visual acuity due to corneal opacity, is considerably less common in children than in adults. It is therefore in danger of being overlooked. In children the appropriate treatment is therefore often introduced too late, or to an insufficient extent. In this article we would like to raise awareness about the diagnosis of chronic keratoconjunctivitis in children, and to present an effective treatment plan for severe stages of the disease. There are two forms of chronic keratoconjunctivitis that occur most frequently in children: hyperergic blepharokeratoconjunctivitis (hBKC) and vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC). With hBKC, the patient often has a history of recurring hordeolum and also presents with blepharitis; it is characterized by the marked presence of corneal neovascularization in the lower circumference of the cornea. VKC is typically characterized by changes under the upper eyelid, with marked changes to the superior limbus. If there is a risk of complications involving the cornea, or in the presence of such complications, a consistent long-term topical immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory treatment is required. Both of these properties are combined in the active ingredient cyclosporine A. Other advantages of topical CSA treatment are its steroid-sparing effect and the long-term reduction of exacerbations. Parents need to be informed about the chronic nature of these two diseases and their tendency to recur; because of these characteristics, treatment, in most cases, should be envisaged for at least one year in order to effectively disrupt the complex immunologic processes. This safeguards the child's visual development and prevents amblyopia caused by scarring and astigmatism. We hope that the data presented will lower the barriers related to prescribing CSA for topical eye application in children.

[Focus on the diagnosis and treatment of blepharokeratoconjunctivitis in children].

Blepharokeratoconjunctivitis, (BKC) is a common ocular surface chronic inflammatory disease in children. It can cause eye irritation or even visual impairment. At present, the etiology of BKC in children is not clear and relevant studies are in the initial stage, consequently, there has not been an authoritative applicable expert consensus in China. Compared with adults, the clinical manifestations of pediatric patients are often atypical, coupled with the lack of understanding, so inadequate diagnosis and treatment are still exist in pediatric BKC. This article reviews the etiology, diagnosis and treatment status, clinical characteristics, standardized diagnosis and treatment of pediatric BKC, in order to arouse the attention of ophthalmologists.

[Diagnosis and treatment of adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis]. / Diagnostika i lechenie adenovirusnogo keratokon"yunktivita.

PURPOSE: To improve the treatment of adenoviral lesions of the eye based on express diagnostics by the fluorescent antibody technique (FAT) and the use of modern drugs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 184 patients (333 eyes) with various manifestations of adenoviral lesions of the ocular surface, who were divided into two groups: group 1 (149 patients, 196 eyes) - acute form, and group 2 (76 patients, 137 eyes) - long lasting form. Effectiveness of the proposed treatment was evaluated against separate group 3 (controls) consisting of 28 people (46 eyes) with completed acute adenovirus infection, who had previously received antibiotic and corticosteroid therapy in other clinics. Conjunctival scrapings of study patients were examined with FAT in our proposed modification. Study patients received local therapy with modern drugs (Okomistin, Aktipol). RESULTS: FAT detected the adenovirus antigen in 169 cases in group 1 (86%) and in 99 cases in group 2 (72%). Treatment duration amounted to 12±6 days in group 1, 18±8 days in group 2, and 29±7 days in controls. In both study groups, the duration of treatment was significantly reduced in comparison with the controls (p<0.01). Stable clinical effect and complete restoration of visual acuity have been achieved in most cases. There were no allergic and side effects from the therapy. CONCLUSION: Fluorescent antibody technique is a fast and effective way to diagnose adenovirus infection in ophthalmology. In terms of therapy, the use of an antiseptic, an antiviral drug and diluted corticosteroids is the most rational approach.

Relapsing viral keratoconjunctivitis in COVID-19: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Since the outbreak of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in December 2019, many studies have reported the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the conjunctival sac of patients infected with this virus, with several patients displaying symptoms of viral conjunctivitis. However, to our best knowledge, there is no in-depth report on the course of patients with COVID-19 complicated by relapsing viral conjunctivitis or keratoconjunctivitis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 53-year-old man confirmed with COVID-19 developed symptoms of viral conjunctivitis in the left eye approximately 10 days after the onset of COVID-19. The results of a nucleic acid test were positive for SARS-CoV-2 in the conjunctival sac of the left eye. The symptoms were relieved 6 days after treatment. However, the patient was subsequently diagnosed with viral keratoconjunctivitis in both eyes 5 days after the symptoms in the left eye were satisfactorily relieved. The disease progressed rapidly, with spot staining observed at the periphery of the corneal epithelium. Although SARS-CoV-2 could not be detected in conjunctival secretions, the levels of inflammatory factors, such as interleukin-6, were increased in both eyes. Both eyes were treated with glucocorticoids, and symptoms were controlled within 5 days. There was no recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In this case report, the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, treatment, and outcome of a case with COVID-19 complicated by relapsing viral keratoconjunctivitis is described, and the involvement of topical cytokine surge in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 as it relates to viral keratoconjunctivitis is reported.

Systemic interventions for severe atopic and vernal keratoconjunctivitis in children and young people up to the age of 16 years.

BACKGROUND: Atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC) and vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) are severe and potentially sight-threatening allergic eye diseases characterised by chronic inflammation of the ocular surface. Both topical and systemic treatments are used. This Cochrane Review focuses on systemic treatments. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of systemic treatments (including corticosteroids, NSAIDS, immunomodulators, and monoclonal antibodies), alone or in combination, compared to placebo or other systemic or topical treatment, for severe AKC and VKC in children and young people up to the age of 16 years. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, the ISRCTN registry, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). There were no restrictions to language or year of publication. We last searched the electronic databases on 17 February 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that involved systemic treatments in children aged up to 16 years with a clinical diagnosis of AKC or VKC. We planned to include studies that evaluated a single systemic medication versus placebo, and studies that compared two or multiple active treatments. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methods expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS: No trial met the inclusion criteria of this Cochrane Review. No RCTs have been carried out on this topic. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is currently no evidence from randomised controlled trials regarding the safety and efficacy of systemic treatments for VKC and AKC. Trials are required to test efficacy and safety of current and future treatments. Outcome measures need to be developed which can capture both objective clinical and patient-reported aspects of the condition and treatments.

The efficacy of 0.1% tacrolimus ophthalmic suspension in the treatment of severe atopic keratoconjunctivitis.

BACKGROUND: Severe atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC) is a relatively rare disease, and some cases are refractory to conventional steroid treatment. OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of 0.1% tacrolimus ophthalmic suspension in treating severe AKC during a 1-year follow-up. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective clinical study. Sixty eyes from 30 patients with severe AKC who were treated with 0.1% tacrolimus ophthalmic suspension 4 times per day, were included. The mean age of the patients was 21.5 ± 13.7 years. The severity of objective signs was observed at baseline (before treatment), at 2 weeks, and at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment initiation. Ten objective signs of palpebral conjunctiva, bulbar conjunctiva, limbus, and cornea were assessed using 4 grades (0 = normal; 1+ = mild; 2+ = moderate; 3+ = severe). Safety was assessed based on the incidence and the severity of adverse events. RESULTS: The total score of the 10 clinical signs significantly decreased from baseline 2 weeks after initiating tacrolimus eye drop treatment, except at 2 months. The mean total score of clinical signs was 13.6 ± 6.6 at the beginning of treatment, and decreased to 5.4 ± 4.8 12 months after initiation. Treatment was gradually tapered, with increasing intervals between applications. Additional medications were required to provide relief in 18 patients during follow-up. No patient discontinued treatment due to adverse drug effects. Herpes keratitis was observed in 3 cases during follow-up. However, these cases were completely controlled. CONCLUSION: The 0.1% tacrolimus ophthalmic suspension is effective for the treatment of severe AKC refractory to standard conventional treatments throughout a full year.

Intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment for retinopathy of prematurity in infants with active adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in infants with active adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis (AKC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using the medical records of all infants treated with intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents during an AKC outbreak previously reported in the literature at a tertiary center for treatment of ROP. The infants were divided into two groups. Group 1 included nine infants (18 eyes) with AKC, while Group 2 included 13 infants (26 eyes) without AKC. RESULTS: During the AKC outbreak, 22 infants were treated with anti-VEGF agents for treatment-requiring ROP. In all patients in both groups, the ROP and plus disease displayed a significant regression within 2 days after the intravitreal injections. Moreover, no serious complications such as endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, cataract or intravitreal hemorrhage were observed after the treatment and there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Immediate and appropriate intervention is very important in cases of treatment-requiring ROP otherwise it can result in blindness. However, laser treatment for ROP is technically difficult in infants with active AKC. The results of this study showed that favorable outcomes without serious ocular complications could be obtained via intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents in infants with active AKC.

Efficacy and safety of 0.1% lodoxamide for the long-term treatment of superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis.

PURPOSE: To report the therapeutic efficacy and safety of topical 0.1% lodoxamide in the long-term treatment of superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis. METHODS: Sixty-seven eyes of 34 patients with active SLK were studied. Therapeutic response was analyzed according to modified-Ohashi parameters. All eyes were treated with 0.1% lodoxamide twice daily, and those with moderate or severe inflammation received a short course (7-14 days) of 0.1% fluorometholone acetate at presentation and during a relapse. Patients were evaluated at regular intervals and followed up for ≥3 months on continuous therapy. Primary endpoints included inflammatory response; rates of inflammatory control and remission; relapses while on therapy or on remission; and therapeutic failure rate. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time on lodoxamide therapy was 15.3 months. The majority of eyes (82.0%) achieved control of inflammation in a mean time of 2.2 months. Of these, 42 (76.3%) eyes remained under control while on therapy for 13.8 months. There was a significant improvement of SLK-related signs by the third month on therapy (p < 0.05). A total of 24 (35.8%) eyes achieved remission. Relapses presented in 12 (18.0%) treated eyes and in 4 (16.6%) eyes on remission. Only 5 (7.4%) eyes failed to respond to therapy. In the majority of cases (95.3%), lodoxamide 0.1% was well tolerated and minor adverse effects not requiring stopping the medication were reported in only 4.7% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Lodoxamide 0.1% is an efficacious therapeutic alternative for the treatment of active and chronic SLK. This medication has proved to be safe and well tolerated.

Pediatric blepharokeratoconjunctivitis: is there a 'right' treatment?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article highlights the importance of recognizing blepharokeratoconjunctivitis (BKC) in children and reviews the clinical characteristics and current therapeutic modalities. RECENT FINDINGS: The mainstay of BKC treatment remains controlling the meibomian gland inflammation and treating cobormid conditions. BKC can occur in the setting of ocular rosacea and Demodex infestation. Small studies have shown treatment benefits of topical cyclosporine A as well as oral azithromycin in pediatric BKC. SUMMARY: BKC is a cause for visual loss in children, and therefore pediatric ophthalmologists should be more vigilant about early diagnosis and long-term treatment. There is a lack of randomized controlled trials on this topic and no standardized outcome measures. Better ways to measure the clinical outcome of various treatment modalities need to be developed.

Topical treatments for blepharokeratoconjunctivitis in children.

BACKGROUND: Blepharokeratoconjunctivitis (BKC) is a type of inflammation of the surface of the eye and eyelids that involves changes of the eyelids, dysfunction of the meibomian glands, and inflammation of the conjunctiva and cornea. Chronic inflammation of the cornea can lead to scarring, vascularisation and opacity. BKC in children can cause significant symptoms including irritation, watering, photophobia and loss of vision from corneal opacity, refractive error or amblyopia.Treatment of BKC is directed towards modification of meibomian gland disease and the bacterial flora of lid margin and conjunctiva, and control of ocular surface inflammation. Although both topical and systemic treatments are used to treat people with BKC, this Cochrane review focuses on topical treatments. OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare data on the efficacy and safety of topical treatments (including antibiotics, steroids, immunosuppressants and lubricants), alone or in combination, for BKC in children from birth to 16 years. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2016, Issue 6), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE ( January 1946 to 11 July 2016), Embase (January 1980 to 11 July 2016), the ISRCTN registry (www.isrctn.com/editAdvancedSearch), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 11 July 2016. We searched the reference lists of identified reports and the Science Citation Index to identify any additional reports of studies that met the inclusion criteria. SELECTION CRITERIA: We searched for randomised controlled trials that involved topical treatments in children up to 16 years of age with a clinical diagnosis of BKC. We planned to include studies that evaluated a single topical medication versus placebo, a combination of treatments versus placebo, and those that compared two or multiple active treatments. We planned to include studies in which participants received additional treatments, such as oral antibiotics, oral anti-inflammatories, warm lid compresses and lid margin cleaning. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened the results of the literature search (titles and abstracts) to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria of the review and applied standards as expected for Cochrane reviews. We graded the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included one study from the USA that met the inclusion criteria. In the study, 137 children aged zero to six years old with blepharoconjunctivitis were randomised to treatment in one of four trial arms (loteprednol etabonate/tobramycin combination, loteprednol etabonate alone, tobramycin alone or placebo) for 15 days, with assessments on days 1, 3, 7 and 15. We judged the study to be at high risk of attrition bias and bias due to selective outcome reporting. The study did not report the number of children with improvement in symptoms nor with total or partial success as measured by changes in clinical symptoms.All children showed a reduction in blepharoconjunctivitis grade score, but there was no evidence of important differences between groups. Visual acuity was not fully reported but the authors stated that there was no change in visual acuity in any of the treatment groups. The study reported ocular and non ocular adverse events but was underpowered to detect differences between the groups. Ocular adverse events were as follows: loteprednol/tobramycin 1/34 (eye pain); loteprednol 4/35 (eye pain, conjunctivitis, eye discharge, eye inflammation); tobramycin 0/34; placebo (vehicle) 0/34. The evidence was limited for all these outcomes and we judged it to be very low certainty.There was no information on clinical signs (aside from grade score), disease progression or quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no high-quality evidence of the safety and efficacy of topical treatments for BKC, which resulted in uncertainty about the indications and effectiveness of topical treatment. Clinical trials are required to test efficacy and safety of current and any future treatments. Outcome measures need to be developed which can capture both objective clinical and patient-reported aspects of the condition and treatments.

[Ocular surface viral diseases in children]. / Virusnye zabolevaniya glaznoi poverkhnosti u detei.

UNLABELLED: Over the past 15 years the number of children with inflammatory eye diseases has increased by five-six times. Data analysis of Moscow children's health clinics in 2014 showed that for 40,000 outpatients a viral infection was observed in 49,000 cases, whereas some children suffered from the viral infection twice or thrice. 344 children (0.7 percent) had the viral infection accompanied by keratoconjunctivitis. According to 2015 data, viral infection was observed in 37,957 children, including 325 outpatients (0.8 percent) with keratoconjunctivitis. AIM: To analyze clinical features and treatment options of ocular surface viral diseases in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We observed 140 children aged 2 to 13 years with ocular surface viral diseases. RESULTS: Despite the presence of corneal disorders, in 95 percent of children changes were reversible - in 1.5 months corneal opacity was not observed. Yet five percent of children, despite the intensive treatment, had bacterial complications, causing decrease in visual acuity. CONCLUSION: In case of viral infections, ophthalmologists, pediatricians and general practitioners should all be aware of ocular manifestations of these diseases. Even if adequate therapy for ocular surface viral disorders is appointed, in five percent of cases complications are possible, causing decline in visual function. Changes in vision can be a result of general disease manifestation, and only timely and proper treatment will help to relieve the symptoms of inflammation and prevent complications.The results of our observations revealed that the addition of Ophtalmoferon medication to the complex therapy of ocular surface diseases in children showed a high therapeutic efficacy and a good safety profile. This medication, in contrast to other antiviral agents, is available in the form of ready-to-use eye drops, significantly enhancing medication compliance in outpatients.

Topical Cyclosporine A 1% for the Treatment of Chronic Follicular Conjunctivitis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of topical cyclosporine A (CSA) 1% in the treatment of chronic follicular conjunctivitis (CFC). METHODS: Retrospective chart review from 2001 to 2012 identified 12 patients (22 eyes) with CFC (mean ± standard deviation [SD] age, 50.2 ± 15.4 years; 75% female; 92% white) treated with CSA. Main outcome measures included inflammation grade, visual acuity, concurrent corticosteroid (CS) therapy, effect on CS taper, and adverse effects. RESULTS: Mean ± SD follow-up time was 11.7 ± 9.7 months. Mean ± SD time from diagnosis to CSA treatment initiation was 2.4 ± 3.2 months. Mean ± SD duration of CSA treatment was 5.8 ± 2.8 months. Four patients (33%) complained of irritation (n = 2), redness (n = 1), itching (n = 1), and burning (n = 1) but none discontinued treatment. Concurrent CSs were tapered off in all patients after a mean ± SD of 5.0 ± 2.5 weeks. Mean ± SD initial vision was 0.078 ± 0.093 logMAR, whereas vision at final examination was 0.056 ± 0.081 logMAR (P = 0.02). Mean ± SD initial inflammation grade of 1.9 ± 1.0 was significantly reduced to final grade of 0.7 ± 0.9 (P = 0.0002). Mean ± SD time to initial inflammation control in 9 patients (75%) was 33.2 ± 24.5 days. Two patients (17%) switched to oral CSA because of lack of inflammation control. CONCLUSIONS: Topical CSA 1% is an effective and well-tolerated therapy that decreased chronic inflammation and tapered topical CS in patients with CFC. The use of CSA in such patients warrants further investigation.

Atopic keratoconjunctivitis: A review.

Atopic keratoconjunctivitis is a chronic noninfectious inflammatory condition and is one of the most severe ophthalmic complications associated with atopic dermatitis. It requires prompt and effective treatment to prevent permanent vision loss. Complications of atopic keratoconjunctivitis include cataracts, keratoconus, infectious keratitis, blepharitis, tear dysfunction, and steroid-induced glaucoma. All treatment for atopic keratoconjunctivitis should be managed in conjunction with an ophthalmologist, and immediate referral is indicated when there is moderate to severe irritation, increased redness, discharge, or any visual symptoms. Treatment options include a combination of mast cell inhibitors, antihistamines, corticosteroids, and calcineurin inhibitors.