Office measurement vs. ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: associations with mortality in patients with or without diabetes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Guidelines suggest similar blood pressure (BP) targets in patients with and without diabetes and recommend ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) to diagnose and classify hypertension. It was explored whether different levels of ambulatory and office BP and different hypertension phenotypes associate with differences of risk in diabetes and no diabetes. METHODS: This analysis assessed outcome data from the Spanish ABPM Registry in 59 124 patients with complete available data. The associations between office, mean, daytime, and nighttime ambulatory BP with the risk in patients with or without diabetes were explored. The effects of diabetes on mortality in different hypertension phenotypes, i.e. sustained hypertension, white-coat hypertension, and masked hypertension, compared with normotension were studied. Analyses were done with Cox regression analyses and adjusted for demographic and clinical confounders. RESULTS: A total of 59 124 patients were recruited from 223 primary care centres in Spain. The majority had an office systolic BP >140 mmHg (36 700 patients), and 23 128 (40.6%) patients were untreated. Diabetes was diagnosed in 11 391 patients (19.2%). Concomitant cardiovascular (CV) disease was present in 2521 patients (23.1%) with diabetes and 4616 (10.0%) without diabetes. Twenty-four-hour mean, daytime, and nighttime ambulatory BP were associated with increased risk in diabetes and no diabetes, while in office BP, there was no clear association with no differences with and without diabetes. While the relative association of BP to CV death risk was similar in diabetes compared with no diabetes (mean interaction P = .80, daytime interaction P = .97, and nighttime interaction P = .32), increased event rates occurred in diabetes for all ABPM parameters for CV death and all-cause death. White-coat hypertension was not associated with risk for CV death (hazard ratio 0.86; 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.03) and slightly reduced risk for all-cause death in no diabetes (hazard ratio 0.89; confidence interval 0.81-0.98) but without significant interaction between diabetes and no diabetes. Sustained hypertension and masked hypertension in diabetes and no diabetes were associated with even higher risk. There were no significant interactions in hypertensive phenotypes between diabetes and no diabetes and CV death risk (interaction P = .26), while some interaction was present for all-cause death (interaction P = .043) and non-CV death (interaction P = .053). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes increased the risk for all-cause death, CV, and non-CV death at every level of office and ambulatory BP. Masked and sustained hypertension confer to the highest risk, while white-coat hypertension appears grossly neutral without interaction of relative risk between diabetes and no diabetes. These results support recommendations of international guidelines for strict BP control and using ABPM for classification and assessment of risk and control of hypertension, particularly in patients with diabetes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Relationship between clinic and ambulatory blood pressure and mortality: an observational cohort study in 59 124 patients.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory blood pressure provides a more comprehensive assessment than clinic blood pressure, and has been reported to better predict health outcomes than clinic or home pressure. We aimed to examine associations of clinic and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a large cohort of primary care patients referred for assessment of hypertension. METHODS: We did an observational cohort study using clinic and ambulatory blood pressure data obtained from March 1, 2004, to Dec 31, 2014, from the Spanish Ambulatory Blood Pressure Registry. This registry included patients from 223 primary care centres from the Spanish National Health System in all 17 regions of Spain. Mortality data (date and cause) were ascertained by a computerised search of the vital registry of the Spanish National Institute of Statistics. Complete data were available for age, sex, all blood pressure measures, and BMI. For each study participant, follow-up was from the date of their recruitment to the date of death or Dec 31, 2019, whichever occurred first. Cox models were used to estimate associations between usual clinic or ambulatory blood pressure and mortality, adjusted for confounders and additionally for alternative measures of blood pressure. For each measure of blood pressure, we created five groups (ie, fifths) defined by quintiles of that measure among those who subsequently died. FINDINGS: During a median follow-up of 9·7 years, 7174 (12·1%) of 59 124 patients died, including 2361 (4·0%) from cardiovascular causes. J-shaped associations were observed for several blood pressure measures. Among the top four baseline-defined fifths, 24-h systolic blood pressure was more strongly associated with all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR] 1·41 per 1 - SD increment [95% CI 1·36-1·47]) than clinic systolic blood pressure (1·18 [1·13-1·23]). After adjustment for clinic blood pressure, 24-h blood pressure remained strongly associated with all-cause deaths (HR 1·43 [95% CI 1·37-1·49]), but the association between clinic blood pressure and all-cause death was attenuated when adjusted for 24-h blood pressure (1·04 [1·00-1·09]). Compared with the informativeness of clinic systolic blood pressure (100%), night-time systolic blood pressure was most informative about risk of all-cause death (591%) and cardiovascular death (604%). Relative to blood pressure within the normal range, elevated all-cause mortality risks were observed for masked hypertension (HR 1·24 [95% CI 1·12-1·37]) and sustained hypertension (1·24 [1·15-1·32]), but not white-coat hypertension, and elevated cardiovascular mortality risks were observed for masked hypertension (1·37 [1·15-1·63]) and sustained hypertension (1·38 [1·22-1·55]), but not white-coat hypertension. INTERPRETATION: Ambulatory blood pressure, particularly night-time blood pressure, was more informative about the risk of all-cause death and cardiovascular death than clinic blood pressure. FUNDING: Spanish Society of Hypertension, Lacer Laboratories, UK Medical Research Council, Health Data Research UK, National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centres (Oxford and University College London Hospitals), and British Heart Foundation Centre for Research Excellence.

Office blood pressure versus ambulatory blood pressure measurement in childhood obesity.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity-related co-morbidities is rising parallel to the childhood obesity epidemic. High blood pressure (BP), as one of these co-morbidities, is detected nowadays at increasingly younger ages. The diagnosis of elevated BP and hypertension, especially in the childhood population, presents a challenge to clinicians. The added value of ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) in relation to office blood pressure (OBP) measurements in obese children is unclear. Furthermore, it is unknown how many overweight and obese children have an abnormal ABPM pattern. In this study we evaluated ABPM patterns in a population of overweight and obese children and adolescents, and compared these patterns with regular OBP measurements. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study in overweight or obese children and adolescents aged 4-17 years who were referred to secondary pediatric obesity care in a large general hospital in The Netherlands, OBP was measured during a regular outpatient clinic visit. Additionally, all participants underwent a 24-hour ABPM on a regular week-day. Outcome measures were OBP, mean ambulatory SBP and DBP, BP load (percentage of readings above the ambulatory 95th blood pressure percentiles), ambulatory BP pattern (normal BP, white-coat hypertension, elevated BP, masked hypertension, ambulatory hypertension), and BP dipping. RESULTS: We included 82 children aged 4-17 years. They had a mean BMI Z-score of 3.3 (standard deviation 0.6). Using ABPM, 54.9% of the children were normotensive (95% confidence interval 44.1-65.2), 26.8% had elevated BP, 9.8% ambulatory hypertension, 3.7% masked hypertension, and 4.9% white-coat hypertension. An isolated night-time BP load > 25% was detected in almost a quarter of the children. 40% of the participants lacked physiologic nocturnal systolic BP dipping. In the group of children with normal OBP, 22.2% turned out to have either elevated BP or masked hypertension on ABPM. CONCLUSIONS: In this study a high prevalence of abnormal ABPM patterns in overweight or obese children and adolescents was detected. Additionally, OBP poorly correlated with the child's actual ABPM pattern. Herewith, we emphasized the usefulness of ABPM as an important diagnostic tool in this population.

Utility of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in detection of masked hypertension and risk of hypertension mediated organ damage in normotensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

PURPOSE: In patients with diabetes, unrecognised hypertension is a serious problem risk factor for the development and progression of chronic complications. The study aimed to determine the prevalence of masked hypertension in normotensive diabetic patients, the factors affecting it, and its association with diabetes complications using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted on 150 normotensive diabetic patients. Patients were subjected to an interview and clinical examination to record demographic data, epidemiological data, and significant past history. ABPM was performed for each patient. Urine samples, echocardiogram, and ophthalmologic fundoscopy were done to check for diabetes-related complications. RESULTS: The mean age of all participants was 56.7 ± 7.8 years. A total of 93 patients (62%) were males. 99 (66%) patients had masked hypertension. A total of 85 (56.7%) were non-dippers, 49 (32.7%) were dippers, 1 (0.7%) was extreme dipper and 15 (10%) were reverse dippers. Non-dipping and reverse dipping were associated with concentric left ventricular hypertrophy LVH (p < .001). Masked hypertension was associated with concentric LVH (p = .001) and nephropathy (p =.008) whereas, nocturnal hypertension was associated with concentric LVH (p = .001) and nephropathy (p =.003). CONCLUSIONS: A single office blood pressure (BP) reading cannot rule out hypertension in patients with diabetes. Regardless of hypertension, clinicians should have all patients, especially patients with diabetes, undergo ABPM at least once. Masked hypertension, changes in nocturnal dipping and other phenomena that raise the risk of diabetes complications but cannot be measured by office BP can be measured by ABPM, and thus ABPM can provide a good prognostic benefit.

Relationship between Clinic and Ambulatory Blood-Pressure Measurements and Mortality.

BACKGROUND: Evidence for the influence of ambulatory blood pressure on prognosis derives mainly from population-based studies and a few relatively small clinical investigations. This study examined the associations of blood pressure measured in the clinic (clinic blood pressure) and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a large cohort of patients in primary care. METHODS: We analyzed data from a registry-based, multicenter, national cohort that included 63,910 adults recruited from 2004 through 2014 in Spain. Clinic and 24-hour ambulatory blood-pressure data were examined in the following categories: sustained hypertension (elevated clinic and elevated 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure), "white-coat" hypertension (elevated clinic and normal 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure), masked hypertension (normal clinic and elevated 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure), and normotension (normal clinic and normal 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure). Analyses were conducted with Cox regression models, adjusted for clinic and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressures and for confounders. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 4.7 years, 3808 patients died from any cause, and 1295 of these patients died from cardiovascular causes. In a model that included both 24-hour and clinic measurements, 24-hour systolic pressure was more strongly associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.58 per 1-SD increase in pressure; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56 to 1.60, after adjustment for clinic blood pressure) than the clinic systolic pressure (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.04, after adjustment for 24-hour blood pressure). Corresponding hazard ratios per 1-SD increase in pressure were 1.55 (95% CI, 1.53 to 1.57, after adjustment for clinic and daytime blood pressures) for nighttime ambulatory systolic pressure and 1.54 (95% CI, 1.52 to 1.56, after adjustment for clinic and nighttime blood pressures) for daytime ambulatory systolic pressure. These relationships were consistent across subgroups of age, sex, and status with respect to obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and antihypertensive treatment. Masked hypertension was more strongly associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 2.83; 95% CI, 2.12 to 3.79) than sustained hypertension (hazard ratio, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.41 to 2.31) or white-coat hypertension (hazard ratio, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.38 to 2.32). Results for cardiovascular mortality were similar to those for all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory blood-pressure measurements were a stronger predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality than clinic blood-pressure measurements. White-coat hypertension was not benign, and masked hypertension was associated with a greater risk of death than sustained hypertension. (Funded by the Spanish Society of Hypertension and others.).

Is Masked Hypertension an underlying Cause of Unexplained Left Ventricle Hypertrophy?

OBJECTIVES: Unexplained left ventricular hypertrophy (ULVH) is defined as increased wall thickness in the absence of conditions that predispose to hypertrophy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of masked hypertension in patient with unexplained left ventricle hypertrophy. METHOD: A total of 120 consecutive unexplained left ventricle hypertrophy patients without overt hypertension and diabetes and 121 healthy control subjects were included in the study. After a complete medical history and laboratory examination, patients' height, weight, waist circumference heart rate, and office blood pressure were recorded. All subjects underwent ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and transthoracic echocardiography. RESULTS: Mean age were similar between patients with ULVH and controls. There was no significant difference in total cholesterol, HDL, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels, left ventricle ejection fraction, between the groups. Prevalence of Masked hypertension was significantly higher in patients with ULVH than controls (28.3% vs 6.6%, p < .001). Left ventricular mass index (141.9 ± 16.8 g/cm2 vs. 67.3 ± 10.3 g/cm2, p < .001) was significantly higher in masked hypertensive patients with ULVH compared to normotensive ULVH and control subjects. CONCLUSION: In this study, we found high prevalence of masked hypertension in ULVH patients. Patients with ULVH should be screened by ABPM to detect possible masked hypertension.

Subtypes of masked hypertension and target organ damage in untreated outpatients.

Purpose: Masked hypertension (MHT) is characterised as an office normotension in the presence of out-of-office hypertension, and can be further categorised as isolated daytime (dMHT), night-time (nMHT) or day-night MHT (dnMHT) according to the time when hypertension is present. MHT is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcome. However, no previous studies contrasted these MHT subtypes in their associations with target organ damage (TOD).Materials and methods: Consecutive untreated patients referred for ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring to our Hypertension Clinic were recruited. Office and ambulatory BPs were measured using the Omron 7051 and SpaceLabs 90217 monitors, respectively. The BP thresholds of daytime and night-time hypertension were of ≥135/85 mmHg and ≥120/70 mmHg, respectively. We performed various TOD measurements, including carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and E/E', estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR).Results: The 1808 participants (mean age, 51 years; women, 52%) included 672 (37.2%) MHT subjects, among whom 123 (18.3%) had dMHT, 78 (11.6%) nMHT, and 471 (70.1%) dnMHT. In all participants as well as patients with office normotension (n = 1222), ambulatory daytime and night-time BPs were similarly associated with all TOD measurements (p ≥ 0.20) after multivariate adjustment. Compared to normotensive subjects (p < 0.05), patients with dMHT had faster cfPWV (7.81 vs. 7.58 m/s) and thicker cIMT (637.6 vs. 610.4 µm), patients with nMHT had thicker cIMT (641.8 vs. 610.4 µm) and increased UACR (0.79 vs. 0.59 mg/mmol), and patients with dnMHT had all worse TOD measures mentioned-above plus elevated eGFR (120.7 vs. 116.8 ml/min/1.73m2).Conclusion: MHT was associated with TOD irrespective of subtype, although TOD varied slightly across these subtypes. The study highlights the importance of controlling both daytime and night-time BP in hypertensive patients.

Masked hypertension is associated with end organ damage in geriatric age: Geriatric MASked Hypertension and End organ damage (G-MASH-End organ Study).

Purpose: It is a question whether masked hypertension (MH) leads to end-organ damage in the geriatric age group. The aim of this study is to evaluate the associations between MH and end-organ damage such as left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and proteinuria in geriatric population.Materials and methods: One hundred and two patients who were admitted to the outpatient clinic were included in the study. These patients were also included in the GMASH-Cog study in 2016, which examined the relationship between MH and cognitive function. All patients underwent ambulatory blood pressure measurement procedures. Cardiac functions of all patients were determined by echocardiography. Spot urine albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) was measured in all patients.Results: Forty four of 102 patients (43%) were diagnosed with MH. ACR was 9.61 mg/gr in the MH group and 7.12 mg/gr in the normal group (p = .021). In addition, left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was found to be higher in the MH group than in the normal group. Mean LVMI scores were 107.76 ± 16.37 in patients with MH and 100.39 ± 19.32 in the normotensive group (p = .046).Conclusion: MH is associated with end-organ damage in geriatric patients. Urinary albumin excretion and LVH which are the parameters of end-organ damage were significantly higher in MH patients. MH may cause end-organ damage and should not be overlooked in geriatric patients.

Increased masked hypertension prevalence in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

OBJECTIVE: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common disorder with important clinical consequences. Many studies have proven that hypertension is one of the most important comorbid disorders in PCOS. Masked hypertension is defined as a presence of normal office blood pressure together with abnormal results in 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). The prevalence of this condition in patients with PCOS is not well defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of masked hypertension in PCOS compared to control subjects. METHODS: Sixty patients with PCOS and 60 control subjects were enrolled in the study. All patients with PCOS and controls without a history of hypertension underwent physical examination including office blood pressure measurement, ABPM, and measurement of laboratory and anthropometric parameters. RESULTS: Mean age was 30.5 ± 6.6 in control group and 26.4 ± 7.1 year in patients with PCOS (p = .001). Twenty-four patients (40%) had masked hypertension in PCOS group whereas 11 patients (18.3%) in the control group (p = .009). Twenty-four-hour diastolic blood pressure (p = .03), daytime systolic (p < .001), and daytime diastolic blood pressure (p = .01) and nighttime systolic blood pressure (p = .01) were significantly higher in patients with PCOS compared with control group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates increased masked hypertension prevalence in patients with PCOS. We suggest that all patients with PCOS should undergo ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for detecting masked hypertension.

Masked Hypertension: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Masked phenomenon, Masked Hypertension (MHT) and Masked Uncontrolled Hypertension (MUCH) is a well-defined clinical entity. However, many aspects of MHT/MUCH remain unclear. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the published literature on MHT/MUCH from 1 January 2000 to 31 June 2018 with a particular focus on epidemiology, clinical significance, evaluation and management. Meta-analyses were performed with respect to prevalence, clinical significance and diagnostic agreement between home blood pressure (HBP) and ambulatory BP (ABP) measurements. RESULTS: The overall weighted-mean prevalence of masked phenomenon was 11% [9,14]; MHT 10% [9,11]; and MUCH 13% [8,17]. The weighted-mean prevalence when expressed as a proportion of patients with normal office BP was 32% [25,40]; MHT 28% [15,41]; and MUCH 43% [29,57]. The prevalence of masked phenomenon determined by ABP (11% [8,14]) and HBP (13% [9,16]), was similar. However, ABP appeared to have a greater sensitivity, i.e. proportion of patients diagnosed as having MHT/MUCH was greater with ABP than with HBP (22% v 16%, p<0.05), when both methodologies were applied to the same cohort of patients. The prevalence of MHT was influenced by ethnicities and comorbidities, and in case of MUCH by anti-hypertensive treatment. MHT/MUCH was associated with increased risk of fatal and non-fatal cardiac/cerebrovascular events (relative risk [RR] 2.09 [1.80, 2.44]), and the risk was comparable to sustained hypertension (SHT) (RR 2.26 [1.84, 2.78]). The increased risk occurred regardless of the method of out of office BP assessment; the relative risks for ABP and HBP were 2.38 [1.90, 2.98] and 1.90 [1.57, 2.29] respectively. The diagnostic agreement between ABP and HBP was only modest, kappa = 0.46 [0.40, 0.52], even though the percentage agreement was 83%. The evidence for the management of MHT was scant. CONCLUSIONS: MHT/MUCH is a common BP phenotype with a risk profile similar to that of SHT. Therefore, high risk patients should undergo out of office BP assessment, probably both by HBP and ABP, to confirm diagnosis and be considered for treatment.

Inadequate blood pressure control demonstrated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pediatric renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Adequate BP control in RT recipients should not rely only by normal office BP but also on normal 24-hour BP. This study aims to assess adequacy of BP control by ABPM and to assess ABPM parameters associated with LVMI in pediatric RT recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients aged 5-20 years who have been followed after RT were enrolled. Demographic data and BP assessed by office and ABPM were collected. Echocardiography was performed to detect LVMI. RESULTS: Thirty RT recipients (18 males) with median age of 15 years (IQR 13-18.5) were included. Among 23 patients who were taking antihypertensive drugs, uncontrolled hypertension was detected in 34.8% and 78.3% by office BP measurement and ABPM, respectively. Thus, the difference in prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension observed by ABPM versus office BP was 43.5%. Those seven patients who were not taking antihypertensive drugs because of normal office BP, four patients (57.1%) had masked hypertension and one patient had elevated BP. Fifteen patients have progression of LVH after RT. Multivariate analysis revealed that age (OR 1.369, 95%CI 0.985-1.904, P-value = 0.062) had a trend to be associated with progression of LVH. Moreover, nighttime systolic BP z-score was significantly correlated with LVMI (r = 0.551, P-value = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The difference in prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension uncovered by ABPM was 43.5%. Nighttime SBP z-score was significantly correlated with LVMI.

Is tinnitus an early voice of masked hypertension? High masked hypertension rate in patients with tinnitus.

OBJECTIVES: Tinnitus is hearing a sound without any external acoustic stimulus. There are some clues of hypertension can cause tinnitus in different ways. The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between tinnitus and masked hypertension including echocardiographic parameters and severity of tinnitus. METHODS: This study included 88 patients with tinnitus of at least 3 months duration and 85 age and gender-matched control subjects. Tinnitus severity index was used to classify the patients with tinnitus. After a complete medical history, all subjects underwent routine laboratory examination, office blood pressure measurement, hearing tests and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Masked hypertension is defined as normal office blood pressure measurement and high ambulatory blood pressure level. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics in patients and controls were similar. Prevalence of masked hypertension was significantly higher in patients with tinnitus than controls (18.2% vs 3.5%, p = 0.002). Office diastolic BP (76 ± 8.1 vs. 72.74 ± 8.68, p = 0.01), ambulatory 24-H diastolic BP (70.2 ± 9.6 vs. 66.9 ± 6.1, p = 0.07) and ambulatory daytime diastolic BP (73.7 ± 9.5 vs. 71.1 ± 6.2, p = 0.03) was significantly higher in patients with tinnitus than control group. Tinnitus severity index in patients without masked hypertension was 0 and tinnitus severity index in patients with masked hypertension were 2 (1-5). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that masked hypertension must be kept in mind if there is a complaint of tinnitus without any other obvious reason.

Renal effects of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in Japanese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with home blood pressure monitoring.

Decrease in blood pressure contributes to the reno-protective effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors; however, its relationship with home monitoring of blood pressure is unclear. We retrospectively analyzed 101 visiting members of the Kanagawa Physicians Association with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease who were taking sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and who monitored blood pressure at home for a median treatment period of 14 months. At baseline, the mean value of HbA1c was 59.3 mmol/mol (7.6%) and the median value of albumin-creatinine ratio was 30.9 mg/gCr that was evaluated in 88 patients. The mean blood pressure both at office and home significantly decreased, and there was a significant positive correlation between the change in albumin-creatinine ratio and both blood pressures. Controlled hypertension, masked hypertension, white coat hypertension, and sustained hypertension were observed in 10.9%, 13.9%, 12.9%, and 62.4% of patients at the initiation of therapy, which changed to 10.9%, 16.8%, 17.8%, and 54.5% at the time of the survey, respectively. In conclusion, management of blood pressure both at office and home was found to be important for the reno-protective effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors along with strict blood pressure management.

Urinary angiotensinogen level is increased in renal transplant recipients with masked hypertension and is correlated with left ventricular mass index and albuminuria in these patients.

Activation of the local renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is an independent risk factor for the development of proteinuria and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) more commonly seen in masked hypertensives. It has been reported that urinary angiotensinogen (UAGT) level provides a specific index of the intrarenal RAS status. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between UAGT and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) with masked hypertension (HT). A total of 116 non-diabetic-treated hypertensive RTRs were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: masked hypertensives and controlled hypertensives. Forty-two (36.2%) of RTRs had masked HT. Mean UACR and LVMI levels were higher in RTRs with masked HT than in RTRs with controlled HT (P < 0.001). UAGT level was also higher in masked hypertensives compared to controlled hypertensives (P < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis showed that UAGT was positively correlated with UACR (ß = 0.024, P = 0.001) and LVMI (ß = 0.082, P = 0.001) in masked hypertensives. Consequently, masked HT was considerably frequent (36.2%) in treated hypertensive RTRs and high UAGT levels accompanied by high albuminuria and LVMI levels were seen in these patients. Overproduction of the UAGT may play a pivotal role in the development of LVH and proteinuria in masked hypertensives.

Urinary angiotensinogen level is correlated with blood pressure level and proteinuria in patients with masked hypertension.

Urinary angiotensinogen (UAGT) level is an index of the intrarenal-renin angiotensin system status and is significantly correlated with blood pressure (BP) and proteinuria in patients with hypertension (HT). We aimed to investigate the possible relationship between UAGT levels and albuminuria in masked hypertensives. A total of 96 nondiabetic treated hypertensive patients were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: masked hypertensives (office BP <140/90 mmHg and ambulatory BP ≥130/80 mmHg) and controlled hypertensives (office BP <140/90 mmHg and ambulatory BP <130/80). The mean UAGT/UCre level and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) of masked hypertensives were higher than those of controlled hypertensives (7.76 µg/g vs 4.02 µg/g, p < 0.001 and 174.21 mg/g vs 77.74 mg/g, p < 0.001, respectively). A significant positive correlation was found between UAGT/UCre levels and ambulatory systolic BP and diastolic BP levels in patients with masked HT, but this was not found with office SBP or DBP levels. Importantly, UAGT/UCre levels showed a significant positive correlation with UACR in both groups, but correlation of the UAGT levels with UACR was more pronounced in masked hypertensives (r = 0.854, p < 0.001 vsr = 0.512, p < 0.01). As a result, UAGT level was increased in patients with masked HT, which was associated with an elevation in albuminuria. Overproduction of the UAGT may play a pivotal role in development of proteinuria.

Masked hypertension and allograft function in pediatric and young adults kidney transplant recipients.

Masked hypertension is a common complication of pediatric kidney transplantation. While office hypertension is known to be associated with worse short- and long-term graft function, the role of masked hypertension in allograft dysfunction is not clear. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 77 consecutive pediatric kidney transplant recipients who had routine 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring with the aims to estimate the prevalence of masked hypertension and examine its association with allograft function. Masked hypertension was defined as a 24-h systolic or diastolic blood pressure load ≥25%. Twenty-nine percent of patients had masked hypertension. Patients with masked hypertension had significantly lower allograft function estimated using the creatinine-based Schwartz-Lyon formula, a cystatin C-based formula, and combined cystatin C and creatinine-based formulas than patients with normal blood pressure (all p values <0.05). In a multivariable analysis, masked hypertension remained independently associated with worse allograft function after adjustment for age, sex, race, time post-transplant, rejection history, antihypertensive treatment, and hemoglobin level. We conclude that in young kidney transplant recipients, masked hypertension is common and is associated with worse allograft function. These results support the case for routine ambulatory blood pressure monitoring as the standard of care in these patients to detect and treat masked hypertension.

[What is the significance of the phenomenon of hypertension in disguise in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated for long-lasting hypertension?]. / Jaký význam má fenomén "maskované" hypertenze u nemocných s diabetes mellitus 2. typu lécených pro setrvalou hypertenzi?

"Hypertension in disguise" is quite frequent in the patients with diabetes mellitus. It leads to organ damage similarly as persistent hypertension and it is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk which can be reduced through effective treatment. Persistent hypertension is present in 70% of the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. During its treatment, the picture of "masked hypertension" may be imitated (normalized blood pressure taken at a day clinic, as opposed to the increased values outside of it). This finding occurs in 35-60 % of the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and it is associated with the significance of changes to internal organs. The importance of this finding has been under discussion.

Impaired cognitive executive dysfunction in adult treated hypertensives with a confirmed diagnosis of poorly controlled blood pressure.

BACKGROUND: High blood pressure (BP) poses a major risk for cognitive decline. Aim of the study was to highlight the relationship between cognitive assessment scores and an effective therapeutic BP control. METHODS: By medical visit and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), we studied 302 treated hypertensives, subdivided according to office/daytime BP values into 120 with good (GC) and 98 poor (PC) BP control, 40 with "white coat hypertension" (WCH) and 44 a "masked-hypertension" phenomenon (MH). Patients underwent neuropsychological assessment to evaluate global cognitive scores at the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) and attention/executive functions (Delayed Recall, Digit Span Forwards, Digit Span Backwards, Selective Attention, Verbal Fluency, Stroop Test and Clock Drawing). Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) served as the index of vascular damage. RESULTS: There were no differences among the groups in terms of gender, age, education, metabolic assessment, clinical history and hypertension treatment. GC presented lower office and ambulatory BP values and IMT. PC performed worse than GC on global executive and attention functions, especially executive functions. In PC, office systolic BP (SBP) was significantly associated to the MMSE and FAB scores and, in particular, to Verbal Fluency, Stroop Errors and Clock Drawing tests. Office diastolic BP (DBP) was associated to Selective attention, nocturnal SBP to Digit Span backwards and Verbal Fluency. Worse cognitive assessment scores were obtained in WCH than GC. CONCLUSIONS: The findings showed that in adult treated hypertensives, a poor BP control, as both doctor's office and daytime scores, is associated to impaired global cognitive and especially executive/attention functions.

The relationship between exercise capacity and masked hypertension in sedentary patients with diabetes mellitus.

AIM: Although exaggerated blood pressure responses (EBPR) to exercise have been related to future hypertension and masked hypertension (MHT), the relationship between exercise capacity and MHT remains unclear. A sedentary life style has been related to increased cardiovascular mortality, diabetes mellitus (DM), and hypertension. In this study, we aimed to examine the relationship between exercise capacity and MHT in sedentary patients with DM. METHODS: This study included 85 sedentary and normotensive patients with DM. Each patient's daily physical activity level was assessed according to the INTERHEART study. All patients underwent an exercise treadmill test, and exercise duration and capacity were recorded. Blood pressure (BP) was recorded during all exercise stages and BP values ≥ 200/110 mmHg were accepted as EBPR. MHT was diagnosed in patients having an office BP <140/90 mmHg and a daytime ambulatory BP >135/85 mmHg. Patients were divided into two groups according to their ambulatory BP monitoring (MHT and normotensive group). RESULTS: The prevalence of MHT was 28.2%. Exercise duration and capacity were lower in the MHT group than in the normotensive group (p<0.05) and were negatively correlated with age, HbA1c, mean daytime BP, and mean 24 hour BP. Peak exercise systolic BP and the frequency of EBPR were both increased in the MHT group (25.0% and 8.1%, respectively, p=0.03). According to a multivariate regression, exercise capacity (OR: 0.61, CI95%: 0.39-0.95, p=0.03), EBPR (OR: 9.45, CI95%: 1.72-16.90, p=0.01), and the duration of DM (OR: 0.84, CI95%: 0.71-0.96, p=0.03) were predictors of MHT. CONCLUSION: Exercise capacity, EBPR, and the duration of DM were predictors of MHT in sedentary subjects with DM.

Left ventricular diastolic function evaluated by the E/e' ratio is impaired in patients with masked uncontrolled hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUH), defined as controlled office blood pressure (BP) but uncontrolled out-of-office BP in treated hypertensives, is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. We tested the hypothesis that MUH is associated with a greater degree of diastolic dysfunction than controlled hypertension (CH) or uncontrolled hypertension (UH). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 299 treated patients who had at least one cardiovascular risk factor (age, 63 ± 10 years; male sex, 43%), consisting of 94 (31.4%) patients with UH, 46 (15.4%) with MUH, 56 (18.7%) with treated white-coat hypertension (WCH), and 103 (34.4%) with CH. We performed office and home BP monitoring, electrocardiography, echocardiography and blood tests. Diastolic dysfunction was defined as an E-wave to e'-wave (E/e') ratio ≥8 measured by Doppler echocardiography. The value of E/e' was higher in the MUH (8.3 ± 2.7) and UH (8.3 ± 2.7) groups than in the CH group (7.3 ± 2.3; p = 0.08, p = 0.02, respectively). In multivariable analysis, MUH was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of diastolic dysfunction than CH (odds ratio 2.90 versus CH, p < 0.01) after adjusting for significant covariates. CONCLUSIONS: MUH and UH were associated with a greater degree of diastolic dysfunction than CH. Even in treated patients, out-of-office BP is important to stratify the risk of cardiovascular disease.