ABSTRACT
Mental health is a complex, multidimensional concept that goes beyond clinical diagnoses, including psychological distress, life stress, and well-being. In this study, we aimed to use unsupervised clustering approaches to identify multidimensional mental health profiles that exist in the population, and their associated service-use patterns. The data source was the 2012 Canadian Community Health Survey-Mental Health, linked to administrative health-care data; all Ontario, Canada, adult respondents were included. We used a partitioning around medoids clustering algorithm with Gower's proximity to identify groups with distinct combinations of mental health indicators and described them according to their sociodemographic and service-use characteristics. We identified 4 groups with distinct mental health profiles, including 1 group that met the clinical threshold for a depressive diagnosis, with the remaining 3 groups expressing differences in positive mental health, life stress, and self-rated mental health. The 4 groups had different age, employment, and income profiles and exhibited differential access to mental health-care services. This study represents the first step in identifying complex profiles of mental health at the population level in Ontario. Further research is required to better understand the potential causes and consequences of belonging to each of the mental health profiles identified. This article is part of a Special Collection on Mental Health.
Subject(s)
Mental Health Services , Mental Health , Humans , Ontario/epidemiology , Male , Adult , Female , Middle Aged , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Cluster Analysis , Mental Health/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Adolescent , Aged , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Health Surveys , Socioeconomic Factors , Stress, Psychological/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Survivors of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer experience significant psychological distress and encounter barriers to accessing mental health care. Few studies have investigated racial/ethnic disparities in psychological health outcomes among AYA survivors, and none have compared outcomes within a racially minoritized population. METHODS: National Health Interview Survey data (2010-2018) were analyzed that identified non-Hispanic Black (hereafter, Black) survivors of AYA cancer and age- and sex-matched Black noncancer controls. Sociodemographic factors, chronic health conditions, modifiable behaviors (smoking and alcohol use), and psychological outcomes were assessed with χ2 tests. Logistic regression models, adjusted for survey weights, were used to evaluate the odds of psychological distress by cancer status after adjusting for covariates. Interactions between variables and cancer status were investigated. RESULTS: The study included 334 Black survivors of AYA cancer and 3340 Black controls. Compared to controls, survivors were more likely to report moderate/severe distress (odds ratio [OR], 1.64; p < .001), use mental health care (OR, 1.53; p = .027), report an inability to afford mental health care (OR, 3.82; p < .001), and use medication for anxiety and/or depression (OR, 2.16; p = .001). Forty-one percent of survivors reported moderate/severe distress, and only 15% used mental health care. Among survivors, ages 18-39 years (vs. 40-64 years) and current smoking (vs. never smoking) were associated with the presence of moderate/severe distress. Among survivors with distress, high poverty status was associated with reduced utilization of mental health care. CONCLUSIONS: A cancer diagnosis for a Black AYA is associated with greater psychological distress within an already vulnerable population.
Subject(s)
Black or African American , Cancer Survivors , Psychological Distress , Humans , Female , Male , Young Adult , Adolescent , Cancer Survivors/psychology , Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Black or African American/psychology , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/psychology , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/ethnology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Numerous US patients seek the hospital emergency department (ED) for behavioral health care. Community Health Centers (CHCs) offer a potential channel for redirecting many to a more patient-centered, lower cost setting. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify unique market areas serviced by CHCs and to examine whether CHCs are effective in offsetting behavioral health ED visits. RESEARCH DESIGN: We identified CHC-year specific service areas using patient origin zip codes. We then estimated random effects models applied to 42 federally qualified CHCs operating in New York State during 2013-2020. The dependent variables were numbers of ED mental health (substance use disorder) visits per capita in a CHC's service area, drawn from HCUP State Emergency Department Databases. Key explanatory variables measured CHC number of mental health (substance use disorder) visits, number of unique mental health (substance use disorder) patients, and mental health (substance use disorder) intensity, obtained from the HRSA Uniform Data System. RESULTS: Controlling for population, we observed small negative effects of CHC behavioral health integration in explaining ED behavioral health utilization. Measures of mental health utilization in CHCs were associated with 1.3%-9.3% fewer mental health emergency department visits per capita in Community Health Centers' service areas. Measures of substance use disorder utilization in Community Health Centers were associated with 1.3%-3.0% fewer emergency department visits per capita. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that behavioral health integration in CHCs may reduce reliance on hospital EDs, but that policymakers explore more avenues for regional coordination strategies that align services between CHCs and local hospitals.
Subject(s)
Community Health Centers , Emergency Service, Hospital , Substance-Related Disorders , Humans , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Community Health Centers/statistics & numerical data , Community Health Centers/organization & administration , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , New York , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Male , Female , Emergency Room VisitsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The lifetime risk of mental health disorders is almost 50% and, in any year, about 25% of the population have a psychiatric disorder. Many of those people are cared for in primary care settings. RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: Measure access to mental health services, such as getting counselling or prescription mental health medications, using new patient survey questions that can be added to Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) surveys. STUDY DESIGN: Surveys were conducted with a stratified probability sample of patients receiving primary care services in a single state in 2018-2019. Medicaid and privately insured patients were surveyed by mail or telephone, respectively. RESULTS: Approximately 14% of sampled patients responded to a survey. More than 10% of privately insured respondents and about 20% of Medicaid respondents got or tried to get appointments for mental health care. About 15% of privately insured respondents and 11% of Medicaid respondents reported problems getting appointments with counselors. Only 8%-9% of respondents seeking mental health medicines reported problems getting appointments for prescriptions. A composite measure combining access to counselors and prescribers of mental health medicines evidenced adequate internal consistency reliability. Group level reliability estimates were low. CONCLUSIONS: Many respondents got or tried to get mental health services and a substantial number reported problems getting appointments or getting mental health prescriptions. The tested questions can be combined into an Access to Mental Health Care measure, which can be included in patient experience surveys for ambulatory care to monitor access to behavioral health care.
Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Medicaid , Mental Health Services , Primary Health Care , Humans , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , United States , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Surveys and Questionnaires , Aged , Health Care Surveys , Mental Disorders/therapy , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Prostate cancer can significantly impact mental wellbeing, creating uncertainty and morbidity. This study described patterns of psychotropic medication and mental health service use, as a proxy measure for mental health problems, 5 years before and 5 years after prostate cancer diagnosis. METHODS: Population-based registry data were linked with Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and Medicare Benefits Schedule data for all prostate cancer patients diagnosed in South Australia between 2012 and 2020 (n = 13,693). We estimated the proportion and rates of psychotropic medication and mental health service use before and after diagnosis. Multivariable adjusted interrupted time series analyses (ITSA) were conducted to uncover temporal patterns. RESULTS: Fifteen percent of men commenced psychotropic medications and 6.4% sought out mental health services for the first time after diagnosis. Psychotropic medication use rose from 34.5% 5 years before to 40.3% 5 years after diagnosis, including an increase in use of antidepressants (from 20.7% to 26.0%) and anxiolytics (from 11.3% to 12.8%). Mental health service use increased from 10.2% to 12.1%, with the increase mostly being general practice mental health visits (from 7.8% to 10.6%). Multivariable ITSA indicated a significant rise in medication and service utilisation immediately before and in the first 2 years following prostate cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSION: There is a clear increase in psychotropic medication use and mental health service use around the time of prostate cancer diagnosis. Mental health outcomes of men with prostate cancer may be improved with early mental health screening, particularly during the diagnosis process, to enable early intervention.
Subject(s)
Mental Health Services , Prostatic Neoplasms , Psychotropic Drugs , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/psychology , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Aged , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , South Australia , Aged, 80 and over , Mental Health , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Registries , Interrupted Time Series Analysis , Anti-Anxiety Agents/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We examined the differences in health care spending and utilization, and financial hardship between Traditional Medicare (TM) and Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollees with mental health symptoms. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: We identified Medicare beneficiaries with mental health symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 and the Kessler-6 Psychological Distress Scale in the 2015-2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes included health care spending and utilization (both general and mental health services), and financial hardship. The primary independent variable was MA enrollment. RESULTS: MA enrollees with mental health symptoms were 2.3 percentage points (95% CI: -3.4, -1.2; relative difference: 16.1%) less likely to have specialty mental health visits than TM enrollees with mental health symptoms. There were no significant differences in total health care spending, but annual out-of-pocket spending was $292 (95% CI: 152-432; 18.2%) higher among MA enrollees with mental health symptoms than TM enrollees with mental health symptoms. Additionally, MA enrollees with mental health symptoms were 5.0 (95% CI: 2.9-7.2; 22.3%) and 2.5 percentage points (95% CI: 0.8-4.2; 20.9%) more likely to have difficulty paying medical bills over time and to experience high financial burden than TM enrollees with mental health symptoms. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that MA enrollees with mental health symptoms were more likely to experience limited access to mental health services and high financial hardship compared to TM enrollees with mental health symptoms. There is a need to develop policies aimed at improving access to mental health services while reducing financial burden for MA enrollees.
Subject(s)
Financial Stress , Health Expenditures , Medicare Part C , Medicare , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Male , Female , Aged , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Medicare/economics , Medicare Part C/economics , Medicare Part C/statistics & numerical data , Financial Stress/epidemiology , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health Services/economics , Aged, 80 and over , Mental Disorders/economics , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Initial interaction with health care system presents an important opportunity to provide substance use disorder (SUD) rehabilitation in the form of mental health services (MHSs). This study aims to identify predictors of receipt of MHSs among adult trauma patients with SUD and positive drug screen. METHODS: In this analysis of 2017-2021 American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS TQIP), adult(≥18 y) patients with SUD and positive drug screen who survived the hospital admission were included. Outcomes measure was the receipt of MHS. Poisson regression analysis with clustering by facility was performed to identify independent predictors of receipt of MHS. RESULTS: 128,831 patients were identified of which 3.4% received MHS. Mean age was 41 y, 76% were male, 63% were White, 25% were Black, 12% were Hispanic, and 82% were insured. Median injury severity score was 9, and 54% were managed at an ACS level I trauma center. On regression analysis, female gender (aOR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.09-1.25), age ≥65 y (aOR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97-0.99), White race (aOR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.28-1.47), Hispanic ethnicity (aOR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.76-0.93), insured status (aOR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.13-1.33), and management at ACS level I trauma centers (aOR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.38-1.57) were independent predictors of receipt of MHS. CONCLUSIONS: Race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic factors predict the receipt of MHS in trauma patients with SUD and positive drug screens. It is unknown if these disparities affect the long-term outcomes of these vulnerable patients. Further research is warranted to expand on the contributing factors leading to these disparities and possible strategies to address them.
Subject(s)
Mental Health Services , Substance-Related Disorders , Wounds and Injuries , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) overcome traditional barriers enabling wider access to mental health support and allowing individuals to manage their treatment. How individuals engage with DMHIs impacts the intervention effect. This review determined whether the impact of user engagement was assessed in the intervention effect in Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) evaluating DMHIs targeting common mental disorders (CMDs). METHODS: This systematic review was registered on Prospero (CRD42021249503). RCTs published between 01/01/2016 and 17/09/2021 were included if evaluated DMHIs were delivered by app or website; targeted patients with a CMD without non-CMD comorbidities (e.g., diabetes); and were self-guided. Databases searched: Medline; PsycInfo; Embase; and CENTRAL. All data was double extracted. A meta-analysis compared intervention effect estimates when accounting for engagement and when engagement was ignored. RESULTS: We identified 184 articles randomising 43,529 participants. Interventions were delivered predominantly via websites (145, 78.8%) and 140 (76.1%) articles reported engagement data. All primary analyses adopted treatment policy strategies, ignoring engagement levels. Only 19 (10.3%) articles provided additional intervention effect estimates accounting for user engagement: 2 (10.5%) conducted a complier-average-causal effect (CACE) analysis (principal stratum strategy) and 17 (89.5%) used a less-preferred per-protocol (PP) population excluding individuals failing to meet engagement criteria (estimand strategies unclear). Meta-analysis for PP estimates, when accounting for user engagement, changed the standardised effect to -0.18 95% CI (-0.32, -0.04) from - 0.14 95% CI (-0.24, -0.03) and sample sizes reduced by 33% decreasing precision, whereas meta-analysis for CACE estimates were - 0.19 95% CI (-0.42, 0.03) from - 0.16 95% CI (-0.38, 0.06) with no sample size decrease and less impact on precision. DISCUSSION: Many articles report user engagement metrics but few assessed the impact on the intervention effect missing opportunities to answer important patient centred questions for how well DMHIs work for engaged users. Defining engagement in this area is complex, more research is needed to obtain ways to categorise this into groups. However, the majority that considered engagement in analysis used approaches most likely to induce bias.
Subject(s)
Mental Disorders , Patient Participation , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Humans , Mental Disorders/therapy , Patient Participation/statistics & numerical data , Patient Participation/methods , Patient Participation/psychology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health/statistics & numerical data , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Survivors of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer face significant psychological distress and encounter barriers accessing mental health care. However, limited research exists on psychological health among lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) survivors of AYA cancer, particularly in comparison with heterosexual survivors and LGB individuals without a history of cancer. METHODS: Using the National Health Interview Survey (2013-2018), we identified LGB survivors of AYA cancer, LGB individuals without a history of cancer, and heterosexual survivors of AYA cancer. Sociodemographic, chronic health conditions, modifiable factors (such as smoking and alcohol use), and psychological outcomes were assessed using chi-square tests. Logistic regression models, adjusted for survey weights, evaluated the odds of psychological distress by cancer status after accounting for covariates. Interactions between variables and cancer status were explored. RESULTS: The study comprised 145 LGB survivors, 1450 LGB individuals without a history of cancer, and 1450 heterosexual survivors. Compared to heterosexual survivors, LGB survivors were more likely to report severe distress (aOR = 2.26, p = 0.021) and had higher odds of reporting a mental health care visit (aOR = 1.98, p = 0.003). Odds of severe distress (aOR = 1.36, p = 0.36) and reporting a mental health care visit (aOR = 1.27, p = 0.29) were similar between LGB survivors and LGB individuals without a history of cancer. While 47.8% of LGB survivors reported moderate/severe distress, only 29.7% reported a mental health care visit. CONCLUSION: A history of cancer during the AYA years is associated higher odds of severe psychological distress among LGB survivors compared to heterosexual survivors. However, many LGB survivors with psychological distress have not accessed mental health care.
Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Psychological Distress , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Humans , Female , Male , Young Adult , Adolescent , Cancer Survivors/psychology , Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Sexual and Gender Minorities/psychology , Sexual and Gender Minorities/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Neoplasms/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Stress, Psychological/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a disabling mental illness that can affect all aspects of daily life and is a leading cause of healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU). AIMS: We aimed to characterise patients with MDD with moderate-to-high-suicide-intent, compare their HCRU to patients with MDD without moderate-to-high-suicide-intent, and better understand their patient pathways. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data collected from primary care electronic health records from Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), linked to Hospital Episode Statistics, Mental Health Services Data Set, and Office for National Statistics in England. Adults diagnosed with ≥ 1 MDD diagnosis between 04/2007 and 11/2015 were categorised by suicide intent. RESULTS: 307,476 patients with MDD were included (294,259 patients without moderate-to-high-suicide-intent and 13,217 with moderate-to-high-suicide-intent). Patients with MDD with moderate-to-high-suicide-intent were younger on average (39.0 vs. 44.8 years) and included a lower percentage of females (58% vs. 65%) compared to patients without moderate-to-high-suicide-intent. HCRU was greater among patients with moderate-to-high-suicide-intent than patients without moderate-to-high-suicide-intent during the first follow-up year for general practitioner consultations (38.5 vs. 29.4), psychiatric outpatient visits (1.5 vs. 0.1), psychiatrist visits (3.6 vs. 0.3), emergency visits (1.5 vs. 0.3), and hospitalisations (86% vs. 26%). Overall, 56% of patients with moderate-to-high-suicide-intent had an antidepressant prescription within 30 days from the initial moderate-to-high-suicide-intent. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MDD and moderate-to-high-suicide-intent were younger, included more males and incurred greater HCRU than those without moderate-to-high-suicide-intent. These results suggest a greater need for effective medical care and appropriate treatments for patients with moderate-to-high-suicide-intent, which could help reduce associated symptoms, mortality, and HCRU.
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Humans , Female , Male , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Adult , England , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Suicide, Attempted/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Aged , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Suicidal IdeationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients' online record access (ORA) enables patients to read and use their health data through online digital solutions. One such solution, patient-accessible electronic health records (PAEHRs) have been implemented in Estonia, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. While accumulated research has pointed to many potential benefits of ORA, its application in mental healthcare (MHC) continues to be contested. The present study aimed to describe MHC users' overall experiences with national PAEHR services. METHODS: The study analysed the MHC-part of the NORDeHEALTH 2022 Patient Survey, a large-scale multi-country survey. The survey consisted of 45 questions, including demographic variables and questions related to users' experiences with ORA. We focused on the questions concerning positive experiences (benefits), negative experiences (errors, omissions, offence), and breaches of security and privacy. Participants were included in this analysis if they reported receiving mental healthcare within the past two years. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise data, and percentages were calculated on available data. RESULTS: 6,157 respondents were included. In line with previous research, almost half (45%) reported very positive experiences with ORA. A majority in each country also reported improved trust (at least 69%) and communication (at least 71%) with healthcare providers. One-third (29.5%) reported very negative experiences with ORA. In total, half of the respondents (47.9%) found errors and a third (35.5%) found omissions in their medical documentation. One-third (34.8%) of all respondents also reported being offended by the content. When errors or omissions were identified, about half (46.5%) reported that they took no action. There seems to be differences in how patients experience errors, omissions, and missing information between the countries. A small proportion reported instances where family or others demanded access to their records (3.1%), and about one in ten (10.7%) noted that unauthorised individuals had seen their health information. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, MHC patients reported more positive experiences than negative, but a large portion of respondents reported problems with the content of the PAEHR. Further research on best practice in implementation of ORA in MHC is therefore needed, to ensure that all patients may reap the benefits while limiting potential negative consequences.
Subject(s)
Electronic Health Records , Mental Health Services , Humans , Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Estonia , Norway , Finland , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Sweden , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult , Aged , Patient Access to Records , AdolescentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Mental disorders are a significant contributor to disease burden. However, there is a large treatment gap for common mental disorders worldwide. This systematic review summarizes the factors associated with mental health service use. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science were searched for articles describing the predictors of and barriers to mental health service use among people with mental disorders from January 2012 to August 2023. The initial search yielded 3230 articles, 2366 remained after removing duplicates, and 237 studies remained after the title and abstract screening. In total, 40 studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Middle-aged participants, females, Caucasian ethnicity, and higher household income were more likely to access mental health services. The use of services was also associated with the severity of mental symptoms. The association between employment, marital status, and mental health services was inconclusive due to limited studies. High financial costs, lack of transportation, and scarcity of mental health services were structural factors found to be associated with lower rates of mental health service use. Attitudinal barriers, mental health stigma, and cultural beliefs also contributed to the lower rates of mental health service use. CONCLUSION: This systematic review found that several socio-demographic characteristics were strongly associated with using mental health services. Policymakers and those providing mental health services can use this information to better understand and respond to inequalities in mental health service use and improve access to mental health treatment.
Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Mental Disorders , Mental Health Services , Humans , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/psychology , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Social Stigma , FemaleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Adjustment and stress-related disorders are prevalent among psychiatric service users. Despite their prevalence, little is known about their prognosis. To reduce that gap, the present article documents the service use and diagnostic outcomes of people with adjustment or stress-related disorders presenting at Singapore's largest psychiatric emergency department. METHODS: Administrative data from 2014 to 2021 was retrieved to follow a group of 683 service users whose first-ever psychiatric presentation in 2014 warranted a diagnosis of adjustment or stress-related disorder. People were grouped a priori depending on whether different diagnoses were recorded within 7 days, 9 months, after 9 months or not at all. Survival curves characterized conversion to other diagnoses and engagement with healthcare services. Service use outcomes include the number of hospitalizations, outpatient appointments, emergency department visits, and prescriptions. RESULTS: Sixty-one percent (n = 417) never received another diagnosis over the 8-year period. This group used emergency services most and received the most pharmacotherapy shortly after their first visit. Of those who received another diagnosis, depression, personality disorders, and psychotic disorders were the most common. Those who received another diagnosis within 7 days (n = 70, 10%) received it on their first day of hospitalization (IQR 1-1), making the most use of inpatient services. The group who received another diagnosis within 9 months (n = 105, 15%) did so after 42 days (IQR 26-84) and had the highest relative number of deaths. Those who received another diagnosis after 9 months (n = 91, 13%) did so after 1,134 days (IQR 613-1,823) and had the longest period of engagement but made the least use of any psychiatric service, potentially suggesting a group whose early index diagnosis heralded vulnerability to future disorders. CONCLUSIONS: A large group of service users with acute stress or adjustment disorders will likely never be given another psychiatric diagnosis and appear to disengage following an initial period of high-intensity service use. The group that received a different diagnosis after the 9-month mark had prolonged contact with services but low intensity of service use and may represent a target for preventative intervention to help them improve their stress-managing skills and avoid developing other disorders.
Subject(s)
Adjustment Disorders , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Adjustment Disorders/epidemiology , Adjustment Disorders/diagnosis , Adjustment Disorders/psychology , Singapore/epidemiology , Longitudinal Studies , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Emergency Services, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite the high prevalence of mental disorders and epilepsy in low- and middle-income countries, nearly 80% of patients are not treated. In Madagascar, initiatives to improve access to epilepsy and mental health care, including public awareness and training of general practitioners (GPs), were carried out between 2013 and 2018. Our study's main objective was to assess the effectiveness of these initiatives, two to five years post-intervention. METHODS: This quasi-experimental study (intervention vs. control areas) included five surveys assessing: general population's Knowledge Attitudes and Practices (KAP), GPs' KAP , number of epilepsy and mental health consultations at different levels of the healthcare system, diagnostic accuracy, and treatments' availability. OUTCOMES: In the general population, KAP scores were higher in intervention areas for epilepsy (11.4/20 vs. 10.3/20; p = 0.003). For mental disorders, regardless of the area, KAP scores were low, especially for schizophrenia (1.1/20 and 0.1/20). Among GPs, KAP scores were higher in intervention areas for schizophrenia (6.0/10 vs. 4.5/10; p = 0.008) and epilepsy (6.9/10 vs. 6.2/10; p = 0.044). Overall, there was a greater proportion of mental health and epilepsy consultations in intervention areas (4.5% vs 2.3%). Although low, concordance between GPs' and psychiatrists' diagnoses was higher in intervention areas. There was a greater variety of anti-epileptic and psychotropic medications available in intervention areas. INTERPRETATION: This research has helped to better understand the effectiveness of initiatives implemented in Madagascar to improve epilepsy and mental health care and to identify barriers which will need to be addressed. FUNDING: Sanofi Global Health, as part of the Fight Against STigma Program.
Subject(s)
Epilepsy , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Madagascar/epidemiology , Epilepsy/therapy , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Epilepsy/psychology , Epilepsy/diagnosis , Adult , Male , Female , Middle Aged , General Practitioners/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Health Services Accessibility , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Postpartum psychosis (PP) is a severe psychiatric disorder affecting 1-2 per 1,000 deliveries. Prompt access to healthcare and timely initiation of treatment are crucial to minimizing harm and improving outcomes. This analysis seeks to fill gaps in knowledge surrounding barriers to care and treatment experiences among this population. METHODS: Participants were individuals with histories of PP who enrolled in the Massachusetts General Hospital Postpartum Psychosis Project (MGHP3). The MGHP3 Healthcare Access Survey, a cross-sectional questionnaire, assesses barriers to care, treatment-seeking behaviors, and experiences with treatment. Descriptive statistics were utilized to describe sample characteristics. RESULTS: 139 participants provided 146 episode-specific survey responses. Lack of available services was cited as the greatest barrier to care for PP. Among those who sought treatment, obstetric providers (34.5%) and emergency medical professionals (29.4%) were the most common initial points of contact. 82.2% of the respondents went to an emergency room or crisis center during their episode(s). Most (61.8%) reported being given insufficient information to manage their PP. Approximately half of participants were hospitalized (55.5%), the majority of whom had no access to their infant during hospitalization (70.4%). Of those breastfeeding or pumping at admission, 31.3% were not given access to a breast pump. 44.4% dealt with delivery-related medical issues during their hospitalization. CONCLUSION: This report is the first of its kind to assess key public health domains among individuals with PP. Findings point to several directions for future research and clinical practice to improve treatment timeliness and quality, potentially improving long-term outcomes related to this serious illness.
Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Postpartum Period , Psychotic Disorders , Humans , Female , Adult , Psychotic Disorders/therapy , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Postpartum Period/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Massachusetts , Pregnancy , Young Adult , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
This preliminary study investigates factors related to reduced access to mental healthcare among women in the perinatal period. We enrolled 145 pregnant women followed in OB-GYN services, using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale as a clinical measure for depression symptoms. We observed low levels of adherence to psychiatric screenings and referrals. Our findings confirm the importance of improving access to mental healthcare for women in the perinatal period.
Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Mental Health Services , Perinatal Care , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Depression/diagnosis , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Depression, Postpartum/diagnosis , Depression, Postpartum/therapy , Depression, Postpartum/epidemiology , Pregnant Women/psychology , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Lithuania has one of the highest averages in the European Union when it comes to psychological and/or economic intimate partner violence (PE-IPV). IPV survivors are several times more likely to have mental health conditions than those without IPV experiences. The aim of this article is to study the prevalence, characteristics and attitudes of PE-IPV survivors in Lithuania, and the predictors of them accessing mental health services. METHODS: A cross-sectional study based on a national survey representative of the adult population. The survey was implemented by a third-party independent market research company employing an online survey panel. Logistic regression models were used in the analysis. RESULTS: Almost 50% of women in Lithuania experience PE-IPV. Females are significantly more likely to experience it than males. The vast majority of women find PE-IPV unacceptable; however, only one-third of survivors seek any type of help. Only one-tenth approach mental health services, with divorcees being at higher odds of doing so. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed to explore predictors and contextual factors of why IPV survivors seek mental healthcare, or not. Policy implications include the need to eliminate IPV and mental health stigma; develop accessible mental health services and effective treatment approaches.
Subject(s)
Intimate Partner Violence , Mental Health Services , Survivors , Humans , Lithuania/epidemiology , Female , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Intimate Partner Violence/psychology , Intimate Partner Violence/statistics & numerical data , Male , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Middle Aged , Survivors/psychology , Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Adolescent , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , AgedABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review was to identify factors associated with multiple visits to emergency department (ED) services for mental health care in adolescents. METHODS: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and ProQuest Dissertations & Thesis Global) were searched for evidence that presented an association between risk factors or correlates of multiple visits to the emergency departmental for mental health care by 10-24 year olds. High impact use was defined as at least one return ED visit for mental health care. Primary studies of any quantitative design were included, with no exclusions based on language or country and all possible risk factors were considered. Data were extracted and synthesised using quantitative methods; frequencies of positive, negative and null associations were summarised for categories of potential risk factors. RESULTS: Sixty-five studies were included in the review. Most studies were from North America and reported a wide range of measures of high impact ED use, the most common being a binary indicator of multiple ED visits. Sex/gender and age were the most frequently reported risk factors. Measure of previous or concurrent access to mental health care was consistently positively associated with high impact use. Having private health insurance, compared with public or no insurance, was generally negatively associated with high impact use. Proxy measures of socioeconomic position (SEP) showed associations between lower SEP and more high impact use in a small number of studies. No other factors were consistently or uniformly associated with high impact use. CONCLUSIONS: The review identified a substantial evidence base but due to the variability in study design and measurement of both risk factors and outcomes, no consistent risk factors emerged. More research is needed, particularly outside North America, using robust methods and high quality routinely collected data.
Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Adolescent , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Male , Child , Female , Young Adult , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Room VisitsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Developing an understanding of the negative impact of discrimination is critical when examining the suicidality of Black young adults in the US. Suicide rates among Black young adults have increased at alarming rates. One of the reasons for this increase is the disparities related to access to mental health services, which has long-term health consequences. This study addresses a significant gap in the literature by examining associations between experiences of everyday discrimination, attitudes towards mental health help-seeking attitudes, on the outcomes suicide ideation, planning to die by suicide, and suicide attempts. METHODS: The data came from a national study of the experiences of Black young adults regarding mental, physical, and sexual health. Participants were recruited from across the Midwestern region of the United States through Qualtrics Panels, an online survey delivery service used to recruit study participants. The total sample for this study was N = 362, and the average age of the sample was 21 (SD: 1.96). We used a logistic regression analysis to examine the role of everyday discrimination, mental health support-seeking attitudes, and covariates on the outcomes: suicide ideation, planning to die by committing suicide, and suicide attempts. RESULTS: Black young adults with positive mental health help-seeking attitudes were 34% less likely to attempt suicide (OR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.96) and 35% less likely to experience suicide ideation (OR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.89). However, those young adults who experienced discrimination daily were more likely to report having attempted suicide (OR = 1.70; 95% CI: 1.34, 2.15). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings offer valuable insights into the complex interplay between experiences of discrimination, attitudes toward seeking mental health support, and suicidal behaviors. However, our research also underscores how experiences of discrimination can significantly exacerbate feelings of isolation, hopelessness, and inadequacy, further contributing to suicidal behaviors in this population. By promoting positive mental health help-seeking behaviors, actively addressing discrimination, and applying an intersectional approach to suicide prevention efforts, we can take significant strides towards building a more supportive and inclusive society. This approach aims to empower individuals to seek help, reduce the risk of suicidal behaviors, and create a more welcoming environment for all members of our community.
Subject(s)
Black or African American , Mental Health Services , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Suicidal Ideation , Suicide, Attempted , Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Black or African American/psychology , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Suicide, Attempted/psychology , Suicide, Attempted/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , United States , Adolescent , Racism/psychology , Adult , Help-Seeking BehaviorABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Prevention and Recovery Care services are residential sub-acute services in Victoria, Australia, guided by a commitment to recovery-oriented practice. The evidence regarding the effectiveness of this service model is limited, largely relying on small, localised evaluations. This study involved a state-wide investigation into the personal recovery, perceived needs for care, well-being and quality-of-life outcomes experienced by Prevention and Recovery Care services' consumers. METHODS: A longitudinal cohort design examined the trajectory of self-reported personal recovery and other outcomes for consumers in 19 Victorian Prevention and Recovery Care services over 4 time points (T1 - 1 week after admission; T2 - within 1 week of discharge; T3 - 6 months after discharge; T4 - 12 months after discharge). T2-T4 time frames were extended by approximately 3 weeks due to recruitment challenges. The Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery was the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: At T1, 298 consumers were recruited. By T4, 114 remained in the study. Participants scored higher on the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery at all three time points after T1. There were also sustained improvements on all secondary outcome measures. Improvements were then sustained at each subsequent post-intervention time point. Community inclusion and having needs for care met also improved. CONCLUSION: The findings provide a consistent picture of benefits for consumers using Prevention and Recovery Care services, with significant improvement in personal recovery, quality of life, mental health and well-being following an admission to a Prevention and Recovery Care service. Further attention needs to be given to how to sustain the gains made through a Prevention and Recovery Care service admission in the long term.