New dosing nomogram and population pharmacokinetic model for young and very young children receiving busulfan for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation conditioning.

BACKGROUND: Busulfan (Bu) is the cornerstone of conditioning regimens prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, widely used in both adults and children for the treatment of malignant and nonmalignant diseases. Despite an intravenous formulation, interindividual variability (IIV) remains high and optimal exposure difficult to achieve, especially in neonates and infants. PROCEDURE: To ensure both efficacy and safety, we set up in 2005 an observational study designed for children not fully assessed during the drug registration procedure. From a large cohort of 540 patients, we developed a Bu population pharmacokinetic model based on body weight (BW) and maturation concepts to reduce IIV and optimize exposure. A new dosing nomogram was evaluated to better fit the population pharmacokinetic model. RESULTS: Bu clearance IIV was significantly decreased from 61.3% (covariate-free model) to 28.6% when combining BW and maturation function. Median Bu area under the curve (AUC) was 1179 µmol/L × min compared to 1025 with the EMA dosing nomogram for children <9 kg. The target AUC was reached for each BW strata, significantly increasing the percentages of patients achieving reaching the targeted AUC as compared to FDA schedule. CONCLUSION: This new model made it possible to propose a novel dosing nomogram that better considered children below 16 kg of BW and allowed better initial exposure as compared to existing dosing schedules. This nomogram, which would be easy to use to determine an optimal dosing schedule in daily practice, will need to be validated in clinical routine. Therapeutic drug monitoring remains strongly advisable for small children and those with specific diseases.

Pharmacokinetic analysis for model-supported therapeutic drug monitoring of busulfan in Japanese pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients.

This prospective observational study analyzed the pharmacokinetics of busulfan in Japanese children and evaluated the predicting accuracy of previous pediatric PPK models of busulfan. This study enrolled five patients (aged 2-12 years, BW 14-48 kg) receiving a busulfan-based conditioning regimen for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at our hospital between January 2017 and December 2018. All patients received a 2-hour intravenous busulfan infusion four times daily for a total of 16 doses. After the infusions, 51 plasma samples were collected with the plasma busulfan concentration measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PPK model fitting was analyzed using the (%MPE) and the (%MAPE). Limited sampling strategies for estimating busulfan AUC were also evaluated. High interpatient variability was observed in the PK parameters. The most suitable PPK model that reflected our data was McCune's two-compartment model (%MPE -8.7, %MAPE 19.3). A combination sampling method using the busulfan concentration at 2 and 6 hours after the start of the first busulfan dose was found to be able to estimate AUC4 day . These results provide useful information on busulfan therapeutic drug monitoring in the Japanese pediatric population.

Evaluation of a Test Dose Strategy for Pharmacokinetically-Guided Busulfan Dosing for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Targeted busulfan dosing helps limit chemotherapy-related toxicity and optimize disease outcomes in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). The objective of this study was to evaluate busulfan exposure from a pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided dosing strategy using a test dose. This retrospective evaluation included adult patients who underwent HCT at our institution with busulfan-based myeloablative (>9 mg/kg) conditioning between January 2014 and October 2015. A weight-based test dose of 0.8 mg/kg was used with PK assessments to predict area under the curve (AUCpred) achieved with weight-based dosing, with a target AUC of 4800 µM*minute (AUCtarget). PK from the test dose was then used to calculate a PK-guided first myeloablative busulfan dose. PK assessments were also done after the first dose to assess if the goal area under the curve (AUC) had been achieved (AUCfirst). A PK-guided first dose resulted in achievement of target AUC with target ranges of ±10% in 50% of patients, ±15% in 75%, and ±20% in 94%. This was an improved rate of target achievement compared with the 33%, 44%, and 63% of patients who achieved the desired AUC for these respective target ranges when using weight-based dosing (P = .12, .004, and <.001, respectively). The PK-guided strategy also decreased the variability of AUC from 3.6-fold in AUCpred from the weight-based test doses (2700.8 to 9631 µM*minute; SD, 1211.6 µM*minute) to 1.8-fold in AUCfirst from the PK-guided first doses (3672.1 to 6609.8 µM*minute; SD, 574.7 µM*minute). This reflects a 2-fold improvement in AUC variability with a PK-guided dosing strategy. This is also improved from the 3-fold variability in AUC reported in other studies. Weight and body surface area were significantly associated with the likelihood of AUCfirst being within the ±10% target range (P = .04 for both associations). There was no significant association between AUCfirst and death, relapse, or a composite of the two. These results demonstrate a significant improvement in target AUC attainment and less interpatient variability with PK-guided dosing using a test dose strategy compared with weight-based dosing.

Pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can greatly benefit from a novel once-daily intravenous busulfan dosing nomogram.

Busulfan, a bifunctional alkylating agent, has been used as a conditioning regimen prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The aim of this study was to derive a novel once-daily intravenous (IV) busulfan dosing nomogram for pediatric patients undergoing HSCT using a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model. A population PK analysis was performed using 2183 busulfan concentrations in 137 pediatric patients (age: 0.6-22.2 years), who received IV busulfan once-daily for 4 days before undergoing HSCT. Based on the final population PK model, an optimal once-daily IV busulfan dosing nomogram was derived. The percentage of simulated patients achieving the daily target area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) by the new nomogram was compared with that by other busulfan dosing regimens including the FDA regimen, the EMA regimen, and the empirical once-daily regimen without therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). A one-compartment open linear PK model incorporating patient's body surface area, age, dosing day, and aspartate aminotransferase as a significant covariate adequately described the concentration-time profiles of busulfan. An optimal dosing nomogram based on the PK model performed significantly better than the other dosing regimens, resulting in >60% of patients achieving the target AUC while the percentage of patients exceeding the toxic AUC level was kept <25% during the entire treatment period. A novel once-daily busulfan dosing nomogram for pediatric patients undergoing HSCT is useful for clinicians, particularly in a setting where TDM service is not readily available or to optimize the dose on day 1.

Clinical Application of the Dried Blood Spot Method in the Measurement of Blood Busulfan Concentration.

The dried blood spot (DBS) method, which is a simple technique for blood sample processing involving the placement of a drop of whole blood onto filter paper, has been used recently in clinical pharmacology to determine blood concentrations of various drugs. This study examined the feasibility of the clinical application of the DBS method for individual busulfan dose adjustments. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of blood samples for busulfan measurements determined using the DBS method were compared with those using plasma separation (the conventional method). Blood samples were collected from patients receiving i.v. busulfan as a conditioning regimen before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at Toranomon Hospital, Japan. Samples collected 2, 4, and 6 hours after the start of the first drip infusion were processed by DBS or the conventional method. The area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) and other PK parameters were calculated to compare the 2 methods. Divergence of <20% in each parameter was considered acceptable. The divergence range for each parameter was as follows: blood concentration at 2 hours after the start of drip infusion, .6 to 8.2%; at 4 hours, .3 to 10.0%; at 6 hours, .3 to 14.2%; and AUC0-∞, .0 to 10.3%. None of the PK parameters showed a divergence between the DBS method and the conventional method exceeding 20%, suggesting that both methods are well correlated. The clinical application of blood sample processing with the DBS method in the measurement of blood busulfan concentration may therefore be feasible, but further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Fludarabine-Busulfan Reduced-Intensity Conditioning in Comparison with Fludarabine-Melphalan Is Associated with Increased Relapse Risk In Spite of Pharmacokinetic Dosing.

Fludarabine with busulfan (FB) and fludarabine with melphalan (FM) are commonly used reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens. Pharmacokinetic dosing of busulfan (Bu) is frequently done for myeloablative conditioning, but evidence for its use is limited in RIC transplants. We compared transplant outcomes of FB versus FM using i.v. Bu targeted to the area under the curve (AUC). A total of 134 RIC transplants (47 FB and 87 FM) for acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome were identified, and median follow-up of the cohort was 40 months (range, 0 to 63.3). A significantly higher 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was associated with FB versus FM at 35.6% versus 17.3%, respectively (P = .0058). Furthermore, 2-year progression-free survival rates were higher for FM versus FB at 60.5% versus 48.7%, respectively (P = .04). However, 2-year rates of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS) were similar. The need for dose adjustment based on AUC did not alter relapse risk or NRM. Patients with Karnofsky performance status ≥ 90 who received FM had a 2-year OS rate of 74.8% versus 48.3% for FB (P = .03). FB use remained prognostic for relapse in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 2.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.28 to 5.89; P = .0097). In summary, in spite of AUC-directed dosing, FB compared with FM was associated with a significantly higher CIR.

Phase I/II Trial of Dose-Escalated Busulfan Delivered by Prolonged Continuous Infusion in Allogeneic Transplant Patients.

Intensive chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus irradiation and allogeneic stem cell transplantation can be curative for patients with hematologic diseases. Reduced-intensity transplants can also achieve cure and result in less treatment-related mortality but higher relapse rates. Thus, optimizing the conditioning regimens used in allogeneic transplantation remains an important goal. We conducted a phase I/II trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of a continuous infusion of busulfan over 90 hours in conjunction with fludarabine followed by allogeneic related or unrelated donor transplant. Fifty-four patients with advanced hematologic malignancies were enrolled on this study. The MTD was identified as a 24-hour area under the curve (AUC) of approximately 7095 µM/min, which represents a 43% increase over the standard total daily AUC dose of 4800 µM/min given by intermittent schedules. DLTs at doses over 8000 µM/min were identified by a desquamative skin rash and mucositis. No dose-related increase in hepatic, pulmonary, or other organ toxicities were seen, whereas efficacy appeared to be improved at higher dose levels. Continuous-infusion busulfan with intermittent fludarabine provides an alternative treatment strategy that is generally well tolerated and permits an increase in total busulfan dose with encouraging efficacy. (NCI study no. NCT00448357.).

High-Throughput Validated Method for the Quantitation of Busulfan in Plasma Using Ultrafast SPE-MS/MS.

BACKGROUND: Busulfan is an alkylating agent used to ablate bone marrow cells before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Because of its highly variable pharmacokinetics, studies have shown that therapeutic drug monitoring is clinically useful for patients undergoing bone marrow transplant so that toxic effects associated with high drug exposure could be reduced and improve clinical outcomes. Current methods for assaying busulfan include the use of gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC/MS), high-performance liquid chromatography, and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. The clinical need for faster turnaround times and increased testing volumes has required laboratories to develop faster methods of analysis for higher throughput of samples. Therefore, we present a method for the quantification of busulfan in plasma using an ultrafast solid-phase extraction/tandem mass spectrometry, which has much faster sample cycle times and similar analytical results to GC/MS. METHOD: Calibration standards, quality controls, and patient samples after addition of busulfan-d4 internal standard were extracted into n-butyl chloride from plasma. The organic fraction was dried and reconstituted in 600 µL of water containing ammonium acetate, trifluoroacetic acid, and formic acid. Sample analysis was performed at a rate of less than 20 seconds per sample using a Rapidfire 300 system coupled to an Agilent 6490 MS/MS using electrospray ionization in positive ion mode. Concentrations were calculated based on a 5-point calibration curve using a 1/x linear curve fit. RESULTS: The analytical method shows excellent precision, sensitivity, and specificity. Minimal ion suppression or enhancement due to the matrix effect was observed. No significant carryover was seen following a sample containing 15,000 ng/mL of busulfan. Seventy-two patient samples were cross-validated with a current GC/MS method. All patient results throughout the analytical range correlated within the acceptance criteria of ±20%. The linear regression demonstrated the following: slope = 1.0067, r = 0.9964, and intercept = -6.2. CONCLUSIONS: A simple, fast, and robust method was developed for the quantitation of busulfan in plasma with solid-phase extraction/tandem mass spectrometry cycle times of <20 seconds per sample.

New insights into the pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan in children with sickle cell anemia undergoing bone marrow transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Busulfan (Bu) is an integral part of conditioning regimens for patients with sickle cell anemia (SCA) undergoing transplantation. Patients with SCA might predispose to transplant-related neurological and pulmonary toxicities due to pre-existing disease-related cerebrovascular and lung injury. Bu therapy appears to be an important contributing factor in this context. PROCEDURE: We studied the pharmacokinetics of intravenous Bu and clinical outcomes of 36 children with SCA undergoing bone marrow transplantation. Most patients had pre-existing organ system damage. Busulfan was administered every 6 hr for 4 days with pharmacokinetic-guided dose adjustment to target a conservative area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) range of 900-1,350 µMol*min. RESULTS: We found that the first-dose Bu clearance was significantly higher (P < 0.0005) than the subsequent daily clearance, which remained unchanged during the following days. After the first-dose, 69% of patients achieved the target range. We adapted a new dose-adjustment strategy targeting exposures to the lower end (900 µMol*min) of the AUC range after the first dose of Bu to avoid unnecessary dose increases on subsequent days due to differences in clearance. This strategy enabled most patients to maintain the AUC within therapeutic range following dose adjustments. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in Bu clearance after the first-dose and subsequent daily doses in patients with SCA should be considered for pharmacokinetic-guided dose adjustment. Conservative AUC range and targeting exposures to the lower end of the range after the first dose was associated with negligible toxicity, and high engraftment and sickle cell-free survival rates.

Safety and efficacy of targeted-dose busulfan and bortezomib as a conditioning regimen for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma undergoing a second autologous blood progenitor cell transplantation.

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who relapse after autologous transplantation have limited therapeutic options. We conducted a prospective, multicenter, phase IIa study to investigate the safety and efficacy of i.v. busulfan (Bu) in combination with bortezomib as a conditioning regimen for a second autotransplantation. Because a safe Bu exposure was unknown in patients receiving this combination, Bu was initially targeted to a total area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 20,000 µM × minute. As no concentration-limiting toxicity was observed in 6 patients, this Bu exposure was utilized in the following treatment cohort (n = 24). Individualized Bu dose, based on test dose .8 mg/kg pharmacokinetics (PK), was administered daily for 4 consecutive days starting 5 days before transplantation, followed by a single dose of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2)) 1 day before transplantation. The total mean dose of i.v. Bu (including the test dose and 4-day administration) was 14.2 mg/kg (standard deviation = 2.48; range, 8.7 to 19.2). Confirmatory PK demonstrated that only 2 of 30 patients who underwent transplantation were dosed outside the Bu AUC target and dose adjustments were made for the last 2 doses of i.v. Bu. The median age was 59 years (range, 48 to 73). Median time from first to second transplantation was 28.0 months (range, 12 to 119). Of 26 evaluable patients, 10 patients attained a partial response (PR) or better at 3 months after transplantation, with 2 patients attaining a complete response. At 6 months after transplantation, 5 of 12 evaluable patients had maintained or improved their disease status. Median progression-free survival was 191 days, whereas median overall survival was not reached during the study period. The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were febrile neutropenia (50.0%) and stomatitis (43.3%). One transplantation-related death was observed. A combination of dose-targeted i.v. Bu and bortezomib induced PR or better in one third of patients with MM who underwent a second autotransplantation, with acceptable toxicity.

Prospective pharmacokinetic study of intravenous busulfan in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in 25 children.

The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the PK and safety of ivBU in 25 Japanese children (median age six yr; range, five months-17 yr) as one of a combination of drugs in a pretransplant regimen. The patients had acute leukemia (n = 14), CML (2), JMML (5), solid tumors (2), chronic granulomatous disease (1), or metachromatic leukodystrophy (1). Five different dose schedules were used according to the patient's ABW: <9 kg (1.0 mg/kg), 9 to <16 (1.2 mg/kg), 16-23 (1.1 mg/kg), >23-34 (0.95 mg/kg), and >34 kg of BW (0.8 mg/kg). Each dose was given over two h, and sample blood was drawn at nine or 11 separate points for analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The AUC varied from 796 to 1905 µmol min/L, and 19 of the 25 patients (76%) remained within the target range without dose adjustment. Two were diagnosed with engraftment failure. Hepatic VOD developed in four, and only one of these showed high AUC (>1500 µmol min/L). Toxicities did not correlate with the BU level. Our data showed very similar PK to those in previous studies, and these dose schedules are applicable to Japanese children.

A phase I study of CPX-351 in combination with busulfan and fludarabine conditioning and allogeneic stem cell transplantation in adult patients with refractory acute leukemia.

This phase I study evaluated the maximal tolerated dose of CPX-351 when administered sequentially with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with refractory acute leukemia. CPX-351 is a novel liposomal formulation that combines cytosine arabinoside (ara-c) and daunorubicin in a fixed molar ratio of 5:1. Patients in cohorts of 3 were treated with CPX-351 followed by fludarabine and busulfan (Bu/Flu) conditioning at 4-week (schedule A) or 3-week (schedule B) intervals. CPX-351 doses were escalated in 20-U/m(2) increments starting at 60 U/m(2) for 3 doses. Of the 36 patients enrolled, 29 were able to undergo HSCT, and the other 7 (the majority on schedule A) did not proceed to HSCT because of rapid disease progression. The maximal tolerated dose of CPX-351 was not reached at the 120 U/m(2) × 3 dose level. All 29 patients who proceeded to HSCT demonstrated adequate neutrophil and platelet engraftment. The median follow-up on the study for all 36 patients was 205 days (range, 20 to 996 days). The 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse for the 36 patients was 60.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43.4% to 77.3%), and that of nonrelapse mortality was 23.8% (95% CI, 10.9% to 47.4%). The 1-year overall survival and leukemia-free survival were 37% (95% CI, 21% to 53%) and 27% (95% CI, 13% to 43%), respectively. Our data suggest that a phase II trial should incorporate CPX-351 120 U/m(2) × 3 dosing on schedule B. Patients with good performance status and those who achieve effective cytoreduction from CPX-351 derived the greatest benefit.

Cyclophosphamide followed by intravenous targeted busulfan for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes.

Targeted busulfan ((T)BU) and cyclophosphamide (CY) for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation carries a high risk of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) in patients undergoing transplantation for myelofibrosis. We tested the hypothesis that reversing the sequence of administration (from (T)BU/CY to CY/(T)BU) would reduce SOS and day +100 nonrelapse mortality. We enrolled 51 patients with myelofibrosis (n = 20), acute myelogenous leukemia (n = 20), or myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 11) in a prospective trial of CY/(T)BU conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. CY 60 mg/kg/day i.v. for 2 days was followed by daily i.v. BU for 4 days, targeted to a concentration at steady state (Css) of 800-900 ng/mL. Compared with (T)BU/CY-conditioned patients, CY/(T)BU-conditioned patients had greater exposure to CY (P < .0001) and less exposure to 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide (P < .0001). Clinical outcomes were compared between cases and controls (n = 271) conditioned with (T)BU/CY for the same indications. In patients with myelofibrosis, CY/(T)BU conditioning was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of SOS (0% versus 30% after (T)BU/CY; P = .006), whereas the incidence of SOS was low in both cohorts with acute myelogenous leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome. Day +100 mortality was significantly lower in the CY/(T)BU cohort (2% versus 13%; P = .01). CY/(T)BU conditioning had a marked affect on the pharmacokinetics of CY and was associated with significantly lower incidence of SOS and day +100 mortality, suggesting that CY/(T)BU is superior to (T)BU/CY as conditioning for patients with myelofibrosis.

Development and validation of a test dose strategy for once-daily i.v. busulfan: importance of fixed infusion rate dosing.

Intravenous (i.v.) busulfan (Bu) administered once daily in myeloablative transplant regimens is convenient, effective, and relatively well tolerated. Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended as nonrelapse mortality increases when daily exposure, as determined by the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC), exceeds 6000 µM·min. We describe sequential studies to achieve accurate prediction of treatment doses of Bu based on the kinetics of a smaller test dose. A total of 335 patients with hematologic malignancies were given daily i.v. Bu 3.2 mg/kg × 4 and fludarabine 50 mg/m(2) × 5. Pharmacokinetic monitoring was conducted for both the test dose and first treatment dose of Bu (day -5). Three different test dose schedules were evaluated: 12 mg Bu administered over 20 minutes, 0.8 mg/kg over 3 hours, and 0.8 mg/kg infused at 80 mg/h. The 3.2 mg/kg treatment doses were infused over a fixed time of 3 hours for the first 2 test dose trials and at a fixed rate of 80 mg/h for the final protocol. All test dose infusions were on day -7. In the first 2 schedules, Bu administered over a fixed time had significantly higher clearance for the test dose compared with the treatment dose. However, when both the test and the treatment doses were administered at the same infusion rate, clearance of the drug between the 2 dosing days was equivalent. Predicted day -5 AUC (AUC(-5)) showed a high linear correlation (r(2) = 0.74) to the actual AUC(-5). The error of these predictions was <20% in 98% of patients and <10% in 80%. In 24 individuals, the test dose predicted an AUC >5500 µM·min; therefore, the first Bu treatment dose was reduced to a desired target AUC. All adjusted doses fell within 20% of the targeted exposure. We conclude that a test dose strategy for therapeutic drug monitoring of daily i.v. Bu is accurate if the test and treatment doses are infused at the same rate. This approach allows targeting of therapeutic doses of Bu to desired levels and the potential for improved safety and efficacy.

Accurate targeting of daily intravenous busulfan with 8-hour blood sampling in hospitalized adult hematopoietic cell transplant recipients.

Daily intravenous (i.v.) busulfan is increasingly being used in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) conditioning regimens. Intravenous busulfan doses administered at the traditional frequency of every 6 hours can be targeted ((T)Bu) to a patient-specific concentration at steady state (C(ss)) using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). In this report, we describe our experiences with TDM of daily i.v. busulfan in an adult population, with the specific aims of (1) evaluating covariates associated with busulfan clearance, and (2) assessing the feasibility of TDM for outpatient administration of daily (T)Bu with pharmacokinetic sampling over 6 hours. A retrospective pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted in 87 adults receiving daily (T)Bu as part of cyclophosphamide followed by (T)BU (CY/(T)BU), fludarabine monophosphate (fludarabine) followed by (T)BU, or (T)BU concurrent with fludarabine conditioning. The desired C(ss) was achieved in 85% of patients receiving daily i.v. busulfan. Busulfan clearance was not associated with sex or age, but was associated with the day of dosing and conditioning regimen (P = .0016). In patients receiving CY/(T)BU, no differences in clearance were found between dosing days (P > .36); however, clearance decreased significantly in patients receiving fludarabine-based regimens (P = .0016). Busulfan clearance and C(ss) estimates from pharmacokinetic sampling over 8, 11, or 24 hours were comparable (P > .4). However, pharmacokinetic modeling of individual patient concentration-time data over 6 hours could not reliably estimate busulfan clearance or C(ss).

Maximally tolerated busulfan systemic exposure in combination with fludarabine as conditioning before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Systemic exposure to high-dose busulfan has been correlated with efficacy and toxicity after hematopoietic cell transplantation for malignancy. We used the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to prospectively determine the maximally tolerated systemic exposure to i.v. busulfan when given once daily after fludarabine administered at 40 mg/m(2) for 4 days. Three target AUC levels were planned: 6,000, 7,500, and 9,000 µM-min. Included were patients 16 to 65 years old, with a hematologic malignancy, an HLA A, B, or C, DRB1 8/8 or 7/8 matched donor, Karnofsky performance status ≥70%, and adequate organ function. For level 1 patients, i.v. busulfan doses 1 and 2 were 170 mg/m(2)/day, then doses 3 and 4 were adjusted based on first-dose pharmacokinetic modeling to achieve an average daily AUC of 6,000 µM-min. Doses 1 and 2 for the subsequent cohorts were based on the level 1 data: 180 mg/m(2)/day for AUC 7,500 µM-min (level 2) and 220 mg/m(2)/day for AUC 9,000 µM-min (level 3), with pharmacokinetic targeting for doses 3 and 4. Pharmacokinetic analysis after the last dose showed that 88% of the patients had been exposed to a mean AUC within 10% of the target. Forty patients were treated at level 1, 29 patients at level 2, and three patients at level 3. DLT was veno-occlusive disease of the liver, which occurred in none of 40 patients (0%) at level 1, two of 29 patients (7%) at level 2, and three of three patients (100%) at level 3. Dermatitis (P < .01) and pulmonary toxicity (P = .01) were also increased at higher AUC levels. Level 2 (7,500 µM-min × 4 days) was the maximally tolerated AUC. Within the confines of the trial's small sample size, there was no suggestion that escalating busulfan AUC from 6,000 to 7,500 µM-min × 4 days increased nonrelapse mortality. Assessment of the higher busulfan AUC on relapse prevention requires trials in patients with a homogeneous risk of relapse.

Busulfan and metronidazole: an often forgotten but significant drug interaction.

OBJECTIVE: To report the case of a clinically significant drug interaction between intravenous busulfan and oral metronidazole observed through busulfan therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). CASE SUMMARY: A 7-year-old boy with a history of myelodysplasia that progressed to acute myeloid leukemia received busulfan with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), clofarabine, and thiotepa as a pretransplant conditioning regimen for a cord blood transplant. The patient received metronidazole the day after a busulfan test dose of 0.5 mg/kg was administered. On the day of the first busulfan therapeutic dose, TDM was performed and the clearance of busulfan was significantly decreased by 46%. After 2 doses of busulfan therapy, the course area under the curve was exceeded, requiring discontinuation of busulfan. Metronidazole is not known to affect glutathione or the glutathione S-transferase A1 (GSTA1) enzyme system or cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. DISCUSSION: Busulfan is a bifunctional alkylating agent widely used in pretransplant conditioning regimens in patients undergoing stem cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies. Busulfan metabolism is best described by hepatic conjugation to glutathione by GSTA1, although some CYP-dependent pathways have been described. Currently there is 1 publication describing the drug interaction between oral busulfan and oral metronidazole, in which concomitant use of metronidazole resulted in higher busulfan trough concentrations and higher risk of veno-occlusive disease. Our case represents a possible drug interaction based on the Horn Drug Interaction Probability Scale. CONCLUSIONS: Though the mechanistic basis for this interaction is unknown, the risks and benefits of using metronidazole during and in close proximity to busulfan should be carefully considered and therapeutic alternatives to metronidazole should be used when appropriate.

Population pharmacokinetics of melphalan in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing high dose therapy.

AIMS: To i) investigate the pharmacokinetics of total and unbound plasma melphalan using a population approach, ii) identify clinical factors that affect melphalan disposition and iii) evaluate the role of melphalan exposure in melphalan-related toxicity and disease response. METHODS: Population pharmacokinetic modelling (using NONMEM) was performed with total and unbound concentration-time data from 100 patients (36-73 years) who had received a median 192 mg m(-2) melphalan dose. Model derived estimates of total and unbound melphalan exposure (AUC) in patients with serious melphalan toxicity and those who had a good disease response (>or=90% decrease in paraprotein concentrations) were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: A two compartment model generated population mean estimates for total and unbound melphalan clearance (CL) of 27.8 and 128 l h(-1), respectively. Estimated creatinine clearance, fat free mass and haematocrit were important determinants of total and unbound CL, reducing the inter-individual variability in total CL from 34% to 27% and in unbound CL from 42% to 30%. Total AUC (range 4.9-24.4 mg l(-1) h) and unbound AUC (range 1.0-6.5 mg l(-1) h) were significantly higher in patients who had oral mucositis (>or=grade 3) and long hospital admissions (P < 0.01). Patients who responded well had significantly higher unbound AUC (median 3.2 vs. 2.8 mg l(-1) h, P < 0.05) when assessed from diagnosis to post-melphalan and higher total AUC (median 21.3 vs. 13.4 mg l(-1) h, P= 0.06), when assessed from pre- to post-melphalan. CONCLUSIONS: Creatinine clearance, fat free mass and haematocrit influence total and unbound melphalan plasma clearance. Melphalan exposure is related to melphalan toxicity while the association with efficacy shows promising trends that will be studied further.

Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan in children undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety, efficacy, and PK profile of intravenous busulfan (Bu) in the context of a Bu and cyclophosphamide (IVBuCy) preparative regimen in children undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). METHODS: Twenty-four children were enrolled in an open-label, multicenter trial of IVBuCy as the preparative regimen for HLA-matched sibling allogeneic HSCT. IVBu was administered q6 hr for 16 doses with a targeted area under the curve (AUC) of 900-1,350 microMol-min. The initial dose was 0.8 mg/kg for children >4 years of age and 1 mg/kg for those <4 years of age. PK of the first dose IVBu was determined to calculate a single dosage adjustment, and with the 9th and 13th doses to confirm steady-state PK. RESULTS: The targeted AUC was achieved with the first dose in 17/24 (71%) of the children using the age-adjusted dosing approach. Dosing was increased in five patients, and reduced in two patients to achieve target values. After dose adjustment based on PK, 91% of the children had an AUC within the target range at steady state (AUCss). Median final dosing and clearance (CL) of IVBu were 1.1 mg/kg and 4.1 ml/min/kg in patients < or =4 years, and 0.9 mg/kg and 2.9 ml/min/kg in patients >4 years. All children were engrafted with documented donor chimerism. No late rejections or graft failures occurred. Four patients had veno-occlusive disease, three of which resolved within 2 weeks of onset. Two children died from transplant-related causes unrelated to Bu. CONCLUSION: IVBu is a safe and effective and offers the benefit of predictable and consistent systemic exposure.

Proposed Therapeutic Range of Treosulfan in Reduced Toxicity Pediatric Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Conditioning: Results From a Prospective Trial.

Treosulfan is given off-label in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. This study investigated treosulfan's pharmacokinetics (PKs), efficacy, and safety in a prospective trial. Pediatric patients (n = 87) receiving treosulfan-fludarabine conditioning were followed for at least 1 year posttransplant. PKs were described with a two-compartment model. During follow-up, 11 of 87 patients died and 12 of 87 patients had low engraftment (≤ 20% myeloid chimerism). For each increase in treosulfan area under the curve from zero to infinity (AUC(0-∞) ) of 1,000 mg hour/L the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for mortality increase was 1.46 (1.23-1.74), and the hazard ratio for low engraftment was 0.61 (0.36-1.04). A cumulative AUC(0-∞) of 4,800 mg hour/L maximized the probability of success (> 20% engraftment and no mortality) at 82%. Probability of success with AUC(0-∞) between 80% and 125% of this target were 78% and 79%. Measuring PK at the first dose and individualizing the third dose may be required in nonmalignant disease.