Choosing breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy and subpectoral implant breast reconstruction: implications for pectoralis major function.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of women are choosing mastectomy and subpectoral implant (SI) breast reconstruction over breast-conserving therapy (BCT). It is unclear to what extent these procedures differ in their effect on the pectoralis major (PM). The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of choosing BCT or SI breast reconstruction on PM function. METHODS: Ultrasound shear wave elastography images were acquired from the PM fiber regions and surface electromyography obtained activity from six shoulder muscles, while 14 BCT participants, 14 SI participants, and 14 age-matched controls remained at rest or generated submaximal shoulder torques. RESULTS: BCT and SI participants were significantly weaker in shoulder adduction, while BCT participants were also weaker in internal and external rotation (all p ≤ 0.003). PM function was altered following either BCT or SI. In all treatment groups, the clavicular fiber region contributed primarily to flexion, and the sternocostal primarily contributed to adduction. However, healthy participants utilized the clavicular region more during adduction and the sternocostal region more during flexion when compared to BCT or SI participants (all p ≤ 0.049). The still intact clavicular region increased its contributions to flexion torques in SI participants compared to controls (p = 0.016). Finally, BCT and SI participants compensated for changes in PM function using synergistic shoulder musculature. CONCLUSION: Both BCT and SI breast reconstruction result in significant long-term upper extremity strength deficits. Our results suggest changes to the underlying function of the PM and the adoption of unique but inadequate neuromuscular compensation strategies drive these deficits.

Three and twelve-month analysis of the PROM-Q study: comparison of patient-reported outcome measures using the BREAST-Q questionnaire in pre- vs. sub-pectoral implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) is being increasingly performed with implant placed above the pectoral muscle (pre-pectoral), instead of below the pectoral muscle (sub-pectoral). Currently, there is a lack of comparative data on clinical and patient-perceived outcomes between pre- vs. sub-pectoral IBR. We investigated whether this difference in surgical approach influenced clinical or patient-perceived outcomes. METHODS: This prospective non-randomised longitudinal cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04842240) recruited patients undergoing immediate IBR at the Leeds Breast Unit (Sep 2019-Sep 2021). Data collection included patient characteristics and post-operative complications. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures were collected using the BREAST-Q questionnaire at baseline, 2 weeks, 3- and 12-months post-surgery. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients underwent IBR (46 patients pre-pectoral; 59% vs. 32 patients sub-pectoral; 41%). Similar complication rates were observed (15.2% pre-pectoral vs. 9.4% sub-pectoral; p = 0.44). Overall implant loss rate was 3.8% (6.5% pre-pectoral vs. 0% sub-pectoral; p = 0.13). Respective median Breast-Q scores for pre- and sub-pectoral IBR at 3 months were: breast satisfaction (58 vs. 48; p = 0.01), psychosocial well-being (60 vs. 57; p = 0.9), physical well-being (68 vs. 76; p = 0.53), and Animation Q scores (73 vs. 76; p = 0.45). Respective Breast-Q scores at 12 months were: breast satisfaction (58 vs. 53; p = 0.3), psychosocial well-being (59 vs. 60; p = 0.9), physical well-being (68 vs. 78; p = 0.18), and Animation Q scores (69 vs. 73; p = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates equivalent clinical and patient-perceived outcomes between pre- and sub-pectoral IBR. The study findings can be utilised to aid informed decision making regarding either surgical option.

Pectoralis Major Muscle Flap Utilization in Salvage Esophagectomy Including Great Vessel Resection Reconstructed by Prosthetic Grafts.

BACKGROUND: Salvage surgery is a therapeutic option for recurrent or residual esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiation therapy. This report aimed to describe the procedure of reconstruction after salvage esophagectomy involving great vessel resection using prosthetic grafts, a pectoralis major muscle (PM) flap, and free jejunal transfer, if required. To the best of our knowledge, no previous report has described the reconstruction of the defect after combined esophageal and great vessel resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2017 to December 2022, 4 patients underwent salvage esophagectomy with excision of the great vessels and reconstruction with prosthetic grafts, as well as a PM flap placement in a single center. We retrospectively investigated the patients' clinical data. The patients were all men, with a median age of 70 (range, 67-77) years. Regarding neoadjuvant therapy, 2 patients received chemoradiation therapy, 1 patient received radiotherapy only due to drug-induced pneumonia, and 1 patient received chemotherapy with adjuvant radiotherapy. RESULTS: Alimentary tract reconstruction was performed by free jejunal transfer in 2 cases, direct suture in 1 case, and stomach roll in 1 case. In all cases, a vascular bypass was established before tumor resection. We created mediastinal tracheostoma in 2 cases. A PM flap was inserted to cover the prosthetic grafts and approximate the tracheal mucosa. With regard to major complications, leakage from the jejunal esophageal anastomotic site was observed in 2 cases. The leakage improved with conservative treatment without graft removal or replacement in both cases. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of locally recurrent or residual tumors after definitive chemoradiation therapy, salvage esophagectomy along with great vessel resection, followed by reconstruction using prosthetic grafts, PM flaps, and free jejunal transfer, if necessary, is a useful option.

Local Infiltration Anesthesia Versus Ultrasound-Guided Pectoralis (PEC1) + Serratus Anterior Plane (SAP) Blocks on Postanesthetic Care Unit Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Primary Submuscular Augmentation Mammoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided regional field blocks are not widely used in outpatient plastic surgeries. The efficacy of truncal blocks (PEC1 + SAP) has not been established in plastic surgery. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcomes of these newer anesthetic techniques compared with traditional blind local anesthetic infiltration in patients undergoing breast augmentation. METHODS: This retrospective institutional review board-approved cohort study compared the outcomes of the different practices of 2 plastic surgeons at the same accredited outpatient surgery center between 2018 and 2022. Group 1 received an intraoperative blind local infiltration anesthetic. Group 2 underwent surgeon-led, intraoperative, ultrasound-guided PEC1 (Pectoralis 1) + SAP (serratus anterior plane) blocks. Patients who underwent any procedure other than primary submuscular augmentation mammoplasty were excluded from the study. The outcomes measured included operative time, opioid utilization in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), pain level at discharge, and time spent in the post anesthetic care unit (PACU). RESULTS: Sixty patients met the inclusion criteria for each group for a total of 120 patients. The study groups were similar to each other. Patients receiving PEC1 + SAP blocks (group 2) had significantly lower average MME requirements in the PACU (3.04 MME vs 4.52 MME, P = 0.041) and required a shorter average PACU stay (70.13 minutes vs 80.38 minutes, P = 0.008). There were no significant differences in the pain level at discharge, operative time, or implant size between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon-led, intraoperative, ultrasound-guided PEC1 + SAP blocks significantly decreased opioid utilization in the PACU by 33% and patient time in the PACU by 13%, while achieving similar patient pain scores and operating times.

Pectoralis major pedicle bone grafting vs. tricortical iliac grafting for Neer 4-part proximal humerus fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The risk of avascular necrosis, nonunion, or malunion is high in osteoporosis-related 4-part fractures. We evaluated the results of patients who underwent plate osteosynthesis with a vascularized pectoralis major graft compared with tricortical iliac grafting to treat 4-part proximal humerus fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients aged 50-75 years with Neer 4-part proximal humerus fractures were studied. Group A (n = 17) underwent osteotomy of a 2.5 ± 1 cm pectoralis major pedicle bone graft and plate application, whereas group B (n = 17) underwent plate osteosynthesis using iliac autogenous grafts. Final follow-up assessments included evaluation using Constant and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scoring systems, humeral neck-shaft angle (HNSA), humeral head height, and humeral head avascular necrosis. RESULTS: Reduction loss was observed in 3 patients (17.6%) in group A, whereas it was observed in 10 patients (58.8%) in group B (P = .013). Humeral head avascular necrosis was found in 1 patient (5.8%) in group A, whereas it was found in 5 patients (29.4%) in the other group (P = .071). The HNSA was normal in 12 (70.5%) of group A patients, whereas it was normal in 6 (35.2%) of group B patients. The HNSA was weak or bad (<1200) in 29.4% of group A patients, whereas this rate was 64.7% in group B patients. Humeral head height was 2.64 ± 1.45 mm in group A and 3.66 ± 1.65 mm in group B. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of Constant and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scoring systems. CONCLUSION: Pectoralis major bone pedicle graft in Neer 4-part proximal humerus fractures reduces the risk of avascular necrosis and nonunion rates. Our technique yielded excellent clinical and radiological results. We achieved recovery without creating additional donor site morbidity.

Technical Refinements and Outcomes Assessment in Prepectoral Pocket Conversion After Postmastectomy Radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Several studies show how submuscular breast reconstruction is linked to animation deformity, shoulder dysfunction, and increased postoperative chest pain, when compared to prepectoral breast reconstruction. In solving all these life-impairing side effects, prepectoral implant pocket conversion has shown encouraging results. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to propose a refinement of the prepectoral implant pocket conversion applied to previously irradiated patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on 42 patients who underwent previous nipple- or skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate submuscular reconstruction, followed by radiotherapy. We performed fat grafting sessions as regenerative pretreatment. Six months after the last fat graft, we performed the conversion, with prepectoral placement of micropolyurethane foam-coated implants. We investigated the preconversion and postconversion differences in upper limb range of motion, Upper Extremity Functional Index, and patient satisfaction with the breast and physical well-being of the chest. RESULTS: We reported a resolution of animation deformity in 100% of cases. The range of motion and the Upper Extremity Functional Index scores were statistically improved after prepectoral implant pocket conversion. BREAST-Q scores for satisfaction with the breast and physical well-being of the chest were also improved. CONCLUSIONS: The refined prepectoral implant pocket conversion is a reliable technique for solving animation deformity and improving quality of life in patients previously treated with submuscular reconstruction and radiotherapy.

The Breast-Pectoralis Flap: A New Advance in Autologous Breast Reconstruction-A Preliminary Report on 20 Cases.

BACKGROUND: In the past, several publications have described breast reconstruction techniques that utilize the contralateral breast; however, interest diminished because of technical difficulty, scarring, and poor aesthetic results. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to present a new breast reconstruction technique that uses a combination of the breast-pectoralis flap and the abdominal advancement flap. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed the results and complications of 20 consecutive breast reconstructions with the breast-pectoralis flap technique. RESULTS: The authors present a series of 20 breast reconstructions that utilized the breast-pectoralis flap. Delayed breast reconstruction was performed in 13 cases (65%), breast reconstruction in 5 patients (25%) with Poland syndrome, sequela correction after a chest wall sarcoma in 1 patient (5%), and sequela correction after breast cystic lymphangioma resection in 1 patient (5%). One complication required surgical reintervention without long-term consequences. The outcomes were considered very good in 50% of the cases, good in 45%, and fair in 5%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of the breast-pectoralis flap and the abdominal advancement flap is an interesting advance in breast reconstruction. Evaluation of the presented cases suggests wider indications for this technique.

Current Global Trends in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.

Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most frequently performed procedure for breast reconstruction following mastectomy, which involves the surgical placement of breast implants. The approach to breast reconstruction can be divided into two main categories, namely prepectoral breast reconstruction (PPBR) and subpectoral breast reconstruction (SPBR), based on the implant plan and placement technique. In recent years, there has been a significant surge in the popularity of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction, where the implants are positioned above the chest muscle, as opposed to beneath it in the subpectoral approach. However, despite this growing preference, there is a lack of comprehensive data regarding the national trends in the utilization of this technique, thus necessitating further investigation. This narrative review aims to ascertain the current global patterns linked to prepectoral breast reconstruction and elucidate the considerations surrounding patient and implant selection, reconstructive techniques, the utilization of meshes in prepectoral reconstruction, the ensuing outcomes and complications, the ramifications of radiotherapy, and the potential advantages of integrating fat infiltration into the implementation of this technique in breast reconstruction with a focus on published papers in last five years. Conclusion: Prepectoral breast reconstruction has emerged as an appropriate surgical option for individuals seeking breast reconstruction. This development can be attributed to the recent progress made in implant technology, which has significantly enhanced the outcomes of this procedure. Additionally, advancements in mastectomy techniques, autologous fat grafting, and the use of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) have also played a vital role in improving the aesthetic results of prepectoral breast reconstruction. As a result, the significance and effectiveness of this technique in the field of breast reconstruction have been firmly established, making it an essential component of the overall armamentarium available to plastic surgeons for breast reconstruction purposes.

Pectoralis major rupture in body builders: a case series including anabolic steroid use.

BACKGROUND: Rupture of the pectoralis major (PM) muscle is a rare injury, with increasing incidence over the last decades, mainly due to participation in weightlifting and contact sports. Surgical management of PM injuries has been related with superior functional outcome, faster return to activities, better cosmesis and higher level of patients' satisfaction. The aim of the study is to present our experience in the management of this rare clinical entity and to correlate the use of anabolic steroids in the occurrence of the injury and the impact of type of injury, method of reconstruction and anabolic steroids on the post-operative outcome. CASES: We present a series of six male bodybuilding athletes who sustained PM rupture during weightlifting. We recorded the location & type of injury, the history and type of anabolic steroids use, the method of repair and the post-operative outcome. TREATMENT AND OUTCOMES: The mean follow-up period was 16 (12-24) months. All patients treated surgically had excellent results according to Bak criteria and returned to full activity within 5.4 (5-7) months following surgical reconstruction. No post-operative complications were recorded, despite the continued use of anabolic steroids, however one patient died from myocardial infarction within a year of surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: PM rupture is an injury with increasing incidence within bodybuilding athletes probably not related to the dominance of the limb. Fixation of the tendon with suture anchors results in excellent clinical outcome and patient's satisfaction postoperatively regardless the chronicity of the repair. Our observations in these cases suggest that anabolic steroids use may contribute to the injury due to an excessive upward adjustment of the athlete's goals in lifting weights and moreover the continuation of administration even in the recovery period does not seem to have a negative effect either on the time or on the level of adequate functional recovery postoperatively.

Head and Neck Reconstruction With 2-Stage External Pectoralis Major Myocutaneous Flap Transfer.

BACKGROUND: In head and neck surgery cases where skin is severely scarred or adhered to surrounding tissue, reconstruction can be difficult to perform using microsurgical tissue or conventional pedicled pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMMF) transfer given the risks, which include damage to major vessels when manipulating scarred skin. For such cases, we perform a 2-stage external PMMF transfer, whereby the PMMF is directly sutured to the defect over the neck skin (without manipulation the hardened skin), and the flap division is then performed secondarily. METHODS: A total of 30 patients who had histories of radiotherapy (60-70 Gy) and prior neck dissection received the 2-stage external PMMF transfer procedure. Indications for the flaps included pharyngeal fistula closure in 12 patients, reconstruction for mandibular necrosis after radiotherapy in 8 patients, salvage surgery for partial or total necrosis of the free flap in 4 patients, and simultaneous reconstruction after tumor excision in 6 patients. Two patients underwent a second external PMMF transfer from the contralateral side because of postoperative complications, yielding a total of 32 flap transfers. RESULTS: Twenty-nine flaps showed complete flap survival, whereas 3 had partial necrosis. Other complications, despite complete flap survival, included large fistulas requiring additional surgery for fistula closure (1 patient) and small fistulas that were closed without requiring reoperation (7 patients). CONCLUSIONS: External PMMF transfer offers a safe, simple, and effective option in cases where free flap surgery is considered difficult or the risks associated with neck manipulation are high.

A Review of 559 Sternal Wound Reconstructions at a Single Institution: Indications and Outcomes for Combining an Omental Flap With Bilateral Pectoralis Major Flaps in a Subset of 17 Patients With Infections Extending Into the Deep Mediastinum.

BACKGROUND: Sternal wound infection (SWI) and dehiscence after median sternotomy for cardiac surgery remain challenging clinical problems with high morbidity. Bilateral pectoralis major myocutaneous flaps are excellent for most sternal wounds but do not reach deeper mediastinal recesses. The omental flap may be a useful adjunct for addressing these deeper mediastinal infections. METHODS: Records of 598 sternal wound reconstructions performed by a single surgeon (J.A.A.) from 1996 to 2022 were reviewed. At the time of surgery, patients underwent sternal hardware removal, debridement, and closure with bilateral pectoralis major myocutaneous flaps. Pedicled omental flaps were also mobilized when additional vascularized tissue was required within the deeper mediastinum. RESULTS: Complete data were available for 559 sternal wound reconstructions performed by the senior author during this period. Bilateral pectoralis and omental flaps were mobilized in 17 of 559 (3.04%) patients. Common indications for initial cardiac surgery included repair or replacement of diseased aortic roots (9/17; 52.94%), aortic valves (8/17; 47.06%), and mitral valves (6/17; 35.29). Mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 3.56. Preoperative morbidity included culture-positive wound infection (12/17; 70.59%), dehiscence (15/17; 88.24%), wound drainage (11/17; 64.71%), and inability to close the chest after the original sternotomy because of hemodynamic instability (6/17; 35.29%). Intraoperative deep mediastinal or bone cultures were positive in 8 of 17 (47.06%) patients. Postoperative complications included partial dehiscence (2/17; 11.76%), skin edge necrosis (1/17; 5.88%), seroma (1/17; 5.88%), abdominal hernia (1/17; 5.88%), and recurrent infection (2/17; 11.76%). Three patients (17.65%) died within 30 days of the reconstruction surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing combined pectoralis major and omental flap closure frequently had a history of aortic root and valve disease, and other significant preoperative morbidities. However, postoperative complication rates after combined flap closure were relatively low. Combined pectoralis major and omental flap reconstruction thus appears to be an effective intervention in patients with sternal wounds extending into the deep mediastinum.

Transferring pectoral muscle flap to depleted neck to create a new recipient source for free flaps in head and neck reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: The thoracoacromial vessels (TA) are one of the options as recipient for free flaps in head and neck reconstruction when the neck is depleted. However, it has limitations such as need of vein graft or kinking and being under pressure on clavicle. The authors describe a new modification of using pectoral branch of TA as recipient vessel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 2019 and January 2022, 8 patients (1 female, 7 male) underwent head and neck reconstructions with free flaps. Age of patients ranged from 53 to 73 years old. All surgeries were because of SCC. Defects were including 3 total lower lip, 2 pharyngoesophageal defects, 1 cheek, lower and upper lip, 1 mandible, cheek and mount floor and 1 tongue and mount floor. Defects were between 12 × 5 cm and 21 × 9 cm. Pectoral branch of TA was transposed to the depleted neck as pectoral muscle flap to prevent kinking and pressure. Over the clavicle, the proximal root of the pedicle of muscle was found and dissected distally until tensionless anastomoses could be accomplished between the muscle and free flaps. ALT, MSAP, and Radial forearm free flaps were used as free flaps. In one patient the fibula and ALT flaps were used as flow through so the pedicle of ALT flap was anastomosed to pectoral muscle pedicle. Pectoral muscle was rotated 180° on its horizontal axis after finishing anastomoses to guard anastomoses from radiated neck skin. Muscle was fixed to sternocleidomastoid muscle with sutures to maintain its position. All donor sites were closed primarily. RESULTS: The diameter of recipient artery was between 1 and 1.6 mm. The veins were approximately same as arteries. All anastomosis were performed end-to-end fashion. Three patients needed skin grafts to closure of tight radiated neck skin. Complications as 1 hematoma and 1 wound dehiscence were salvaged successfully. All flaps survived. Patients were followed up between 2 and 6 months. Our first patient died at post-operative 6th month so long follow-up could not be achieved. The final outcomes such as chewing, oral competence and swallowing were successful for remaining patients. CONCLUSION: Transposing TA as pectoral muscle flap to the neck can decrease need of vein graft and prevent kinking or pressure of the pedicle on the clavicle.

Pectoralis major rupture repair with Achilles tendon allograft in 22 bodybuilding athletes.

BACKGROUND: Pectoralis major tendon rupture rate is increasing due to increased tendency to bodybuilding exercises, specially the bench press workout, and weight-lifting. The aim of this study was to determine the results of pectoralis major rupture repair with Achilles tendon allograft in bodybuilding athletes. METHODS: In this case series study, 22 bodybuilding athlete patients (24 pectoralis major ruptures) were undergone open surgical repair during January 2016 till December 2020. 21 ruptures were chronic (2 ruptures were revision) and 3 ruptures were acute. Surgical method was based on Achilles tendon allograft used to augment the ruptured site for lengthening the shortened tendon.The results were analyzed using Bak's criteria and Constant score in pre operation visit and 6th and 12th months and in the last follow up. RESULTS: All cases were male with the mean age of 32.1 ± 5.4. The mean duration time between injuries to surgery was 37 ± 46 month (1-182 months). Return to professional sport began at 10.9 ± 2.8 months after surgery in which 16 cases (66.7%) have returned to their pre surgery bench press workout records. No infection or hematoma occurred. At the final follow-up, Bak criteria demonstrated excellent, good and fair in 4, 18 and 2 shoulders respectively. The constant score increased from 87.9 ± 7.9 in pre operation visit to 92.7 ± 6.4 in the last follow up (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: It seems that our surgical method is an effective approach in cases with acute or chronic pectoralis major ruptures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Pectoralis Major Tendon Rupture While Bouldering.

Pectoralis major tendon ruptures are rare injuries. We present a case of a pectoralis major tendon rupture incurred while bouldering that required surgical repair. The diagnosis of pectoralis major tendon rupture relies predominantly on clinical examination. Among athletes, outcomes after surgical repair are superior to those after nonoperative therapy in most cases of complete tendon rupture. Although infrequent, pectoralis major tendon ruptures can occur while climbing, and early recognition and expedited surgical treatment are paramount to maximize functional recovery.

[Effect of the Hyoid Bone Suspension Technique on the Preservation of Swallowing Function after Total Glossectomy and Pectoralis Major Musculocutaneous Flap Reconstruction for Locally Advanced Tongue Cancer].

Dysphagia is a major postoperative complication in patients with locally advanced oral cancer. In this case report, we describe the effect of the hyoid bone suspension technique on the preservation of swallowing function after total glossectomy and pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap reconstruction for locally advanced tongue cancer. Case: A 72-year-old Japanese male was diagnosed with advanced squamous cell carcinoma on the left side of his tongue(cT4aN2cM0, cStage ⅣA). Under general anesthesia, the patient underwent a tracheotomy, bilateral modified radical neck dissection type Ⅲ, total glossectomy, and reconstruction with a left pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap(PMMC flap). Intraoperatively, the PMMC flap was designed to have a heart shape of 11×6 cm and was elevated. Subsequently, holes were made at the lower edge of the mandible, and the hyoid bone was suspended and fixed to the mandibular border using 2-0 nylon sutures. The postoperative course was uneventful; the flap was completely engrafted and was in good condition. The hyoid bone suspension technique can reproduce the pharyngeal phase of swallowing, and the palatal augmentation prosthesis helps to improve food mass feeding and preserve the swallowing function.

Submuscular Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using a Musculofascial Pocket Formed by the Pectoralis Major Muscle and the Serratus Anterior Muscle Fascia: A Novel Surgical Approach.

BACKGROUND: Subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction following mastectomy commonly severs the inferior border of the pectoralis major muscle for better projection of the lower pole. This can affect a patient's postoperative motor function and result in animation deformity. Implant-based breast reconstruction using partial muscle coverage with an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) can be costly. There is an unmet clinical need for a novel surgical method for submuscular implant-based breast reconstruction. METHODS: We describe an innovative technique for submuscular implant-based breast reconstruction following mastectomy. The approach utilizes the serratus anterior muscle fascia connected to the lateral margin of the pectoralis major muscle to form a lateral tissue pocket for implant coverage. This method preserves the inferior border of the pectoralis major muscle and minimizes the size of ADM coverage. Patient satisfaction on the BREAST-Q Reconstruction Module and complications were assessed 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: The novel surgical design was safe and used minimal ADM (6 × 5cm2). Mean satisfaction with breasts was 61 ± 4.7 (range, 48-73), mean psychosocial well-being was 66 ± 10 (range, 50-93), and mean sexual well-being was 47 ± 7.8 (range, 27-70). Animation deformity was avoided by preserving the inferior border of the pectoralis major muscle. Rates of revision (7.6%) and postsurgical seroma (3.4%) were low, and capsular contracture was minimal. CONCLUSIONS: Submuscular implant-based breast reconstruction following mastectomy utilizing the serratus anterior muscle fascia connected to the lateral margin of the pectoralis major muscle to form a lateral tissue pocket for implant coverage is safe, feasible, and generates good aesthetic outcomes.

Role of Botulinum Toxin in Pectoralis Minor Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) causes neurogenic symptoms in 95% of the cases due to neurovascular bundle compression. The treatment goal is the decompression of the neurovascular structures. In the last decade, non-surgical treatments have been evaluated as a treatment option for spastic syndromes and thoracic outlet syndrome. In this study we report the use of botulinum toxin (BTX-A) injection as a diagnostic tool to identify the pectoral minor syndrome, and as a less aggressive treatment-option. METHODS: An observational cohort study of patients with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome who underwent sonographically guided chemodenervation of pectoral minor muscle with botulinum toxin. Follow-up includes clinical evaluation at one month, 3 months and 6 months after the procedure. Clinical evaluation was made with clinical questionnaire. In case of patients with partial improvement of the symptoms, a second infiltration of BTX-A was performed. The categorical variables were shown as percentages, and the continuous variables as mean and standard deviation (SD). For the comparison of categorical variables, the Fisher's exact test was used. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS version 20.0 program. We consider P <0.05 to be statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of twenty-six patients were diagnosed with thoracic outlet syndrome in this period, and 20 accomplished the inclusion criteria. 7 patients were excluded (1 due to neoplasia, 2 did not sign the informed consent, 1 due to neoplasia, 2 did not sign the informed consent, 1 was lost during the follow-up and 3 due to anomalies of the first rib secondary to fractures and cervical rib and 1 was lost during the follow-up), therefore a sample of 13 patients aged between 24 and 55 years was obtained. The most common type of procedure performed was the single injection of 50 IU of botulinum toxin. 4 patients were infiltrated in 2 occasions due to partial improvement in symptoms at 1month follow-up. Clinical stability was found at three months and at 6 months follow-up. CONCLUSION: The ultrasound-guided botulinum injection of the pectoralis minor muscles provides symptoms relief in patients with pectoral minor syndrome, and could be considered a safe tool in the diagnosis of the pectoralis minor syndrome within the spectrum of thoracic operculum syndrome.

Outcome of arthroscopic pectoralis minor release and scapulopexy for the management of scapulothoracic abnormal motion.

BACKGROUND: Management of persistent symptomatic scapulothoracic abnormal motion (STAM) in the absence of periscapular muscle paralysis may be challenging. This study reports the outcomes of arthroscopic pectoralis minor release and scapulopexy for the management of symptomatic STAM secondary to pectoralis minor hyperactivity and serratus anterior hypoactivity in the absence of periscapular paralysis. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data of patients with symptomatic STAM secondary to pectoralis minor hyperactivity and serratus anterior hypoactivity. Surgery was indicated if patients failed 6 months of conservative management. Patient outcomes were assessed with shoulder range of motion (ROM) measurements, numerical pain scale, shoulder subjective value (SSV), and Constant score. Data were analyzed with Fischer's exact test for categorical variables and Student's t-test of unequal variance for continuous and categorical variables. RESULTS: Thirty-one consecutive patients were included in the study period between 2017 and 2020. Average age at the time of surgery was 24 years (range, 14-44 years), 80% of patients were female, and average follow-up after surgery was 23 months (range, 15-39 months). Thirteen patients also had a diagnosis of recurrent posterior instability. At final follow-up, 81% reported significant improvements in their STAM, as demonstrated by improved mean pain scale, ROM, SSV, and Constant scores. Pain improved from 6 (range, 4-10) to 2 (range, 1-4), SSV from 30% (range, 10%-40%) to 75% (range, 60%-100%), and Constant score from 49 (range, 43-61) preoperatively to 79 (range, 51-100) postoperatively (P < .01). All 13 patients with recurrent associated posterior instability had resolution of their instability. Flexion ROM improved from average 100° (range, 60°-150°) to 140° (range, 120°-160°). One patient had traumatic rupture of her scapulopexy 7 weeks postoperatively and underwent revision scapulopexy. Thirteen percent had minimal improvement after surgery and experienced recurrence 3 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: In patients with symptomatic STAM secondary to pectoralis minor hyperactivity and serratus anterior hypoactivity, arthroscopic pectoralis minor release and scapulopexy is an effective surgical option.

Free extended anterolateral thigh myocutaneous flap versus combined pedicled pectoralis major-latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps in deep and extensive sternal wound reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The combined pedicled pectoralis major-latissimus dorsi (PM-LD) and free extended anterolateral thigh (ALT) myocutaneous flaps provide well-vascularized tissues for extensive sternal wound reconstruction. However, the outcomes and postoperative complications between the two surgical techniques are different. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of these two reconstructive options. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study was conducted between August 2011 and May 2019. Forty-four patients diagnosed with deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) and presented with grade four complications (sternal instability and necrotic bone tissue) were enrolled. Two reconstructive strategies, namely, combined pedicled PM-LD (n = 24) and free extended ALT (n = 20) myocutaneous flaps, were used according to the patients' hemodynamics. Data including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), hospital stay, follow-up, defect/flap size, number of surgical procedures before reconstruction, duration from the last debridement to flap coverage, comorbidities, and postoperative complications, were obtained for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The mean defect size in the combined PM-LD myocutaneous flap group was 188.4 (5*17-10*23) cm2 , and the mean flap size was 150.0 (8*12-15*15) cm2 and 205.0 (8*15-10*25) cm2 in PM and LD flap, respectively. The mean defect size in the free extended ALT myocutaneus flap group was 202.5 (6*16-10*21) cm2 , and the mean flap size was 285.2 (9*30-12*25) cm2 . No significant differences were observed between the free extended ALT and the combined pedicled PM-LD myocutaneous flaps in relation to age, gender, BMI, hospital days, follow-up, defect size, preoperative procedures, and comorbidities, except for the average operative time (443.2 ± 31.2 vs. 321.3 ± 54.3 mins, p = .048). The combined pedicled PM-LD myocutaneous flap had significantly more donor site complications, including seroma (21% vs. 0%, p = .030), bilateral nipple-areolar complex asymmetry (100% vs. 0%, p < .0001), and skin graft loss with infection (33% vs. 0%; p = .044) than the free extended ALT myocutaneous flap. CONCLUSION: The free extended ALT and the combined pedicled PM-LD myocutaneous flaps were both feasible and effective options for sternal wound reconstruction. Our findings suggested that the free extended ALT myocutaneous flap may be a better alternative for a comprehensive and extensive reconstruction of sternal wounds. Further studies based on these findings can be conducted.

Breast Augmentation in Athletic Women: A Retrospective Survey Assessing Pectoral Muscle Function and Implant Aesthetics Post-Augmentation.

BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation is the most common cosmetic, surgical procedure (1). Implant insertion planes include subglandular or submuscular. Submuscular augmentation is often preferred in women with less soft tissue coverage; requiring pectoralis major dissection (2). However, loss of functional muscle fibres is undesirable in athletic women who actively train the pectoral region. OBJECTIVES: 1. Assessment of pectoralis function and strength after breast augmentation in athletic women. 2. Augmentation aesthetical satisfaction at rest and whilst training. METHODS: A retrospective survey was sent to female, fitness competitors with breast implants via social media over a six-month period. The survey assessed baseline demographics, pectoral strength (bench press, push-ups, pectoral fly), aesthetical satisfaction and issues during training including pain, rippling, firmness and implant movement. RESULTS: Eighty-one participants were surveyed. The mean age of augmentation was 29.7 (±8.41), and mean age of survey completion was 37.6 (±7.22) years. Submuscular augmentation was performed in 72.8% of participants. Recovery post-operative and time spent training was synonymous. The majority of participants' pectoral strength was unaffected or positively affected by breast augmentation. Assessment of post-operative performance and training issues of pain, rippling and firmness yielded no statistically significant difference between groups. Implant movement during pectoral exercises was 2.5 times more likely with submuscular augmentations, p= 0.038. Overall, the majority of the population were very satisfied or satisfied with their breast aesthetic at rest (92.6%) and during training (79.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Breast augmentation in athletic women has a high satisfaction rate with the majority maintaining or improving the strength of the pectoral region regardless of augmentation plane. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://www.springer.com/journal/00266 .