Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 156
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Cephalalgia ; 44(9): 3331024241276501, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39279320

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It is still debatable whether the mechanisms underlying photophobia are related to altered visual cortex excitability or specific abnormalities of colour-related focal macular retino-thalamic information processing. METHODS: This cross-sectional study examined Ganzfeld blue-red (B-R) and blue-yellow (B-Y) focal macular cone flash ERG (ffERG) and focal-flash visual evoked potentials (ffVEPs) simultaneously in a group of migraine patients with (n = 18) and without (n = 19) aura during the interictal phase, in comparison to a group of healthy volunteers (HVs) (n = 20). We correlate the resulting retinal and cortical electrophysiological responses with subjective discomfort from exposure to bright light verified on a numerical scale. RESULTS: Compared to HVs, the amplitude and phase of the first and second harmonic of ffERG and ffVEPs were non-significantly different in migraine patients without aura and migraine patients with aura for both the B-R and the B-Y focal stimuli. Pearson's correlation test did not disclose correlations between clinical variables, including the photophobia scale and electrophysiological variables. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not favour interictal functional abnormalities in L-M- and S-cone opponent visual pathways in patients with migraine. They also suggest that the discomfort resulting from exposure to bright light is not related to focal macular retinal-to-visual cortex pathway.


Subject(s)
Electroretinography , Evoked Potentials, Visual , Migraine Disorders , Photophobia , Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells , Humans , Photophobia/physiopathology , Female , Male , Adult , Evoked Potentials, Visual/physiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells/physiology , Middle Aged , Photic Stimulation/methods , Young Adult
2.
Headache ; 64(8): 1005-1014, 2024 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39023425

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine cerebral functional alterations associated with sensory processing in patients with migraine and constant photophobia. BACKGROUND: Migraine is a common headache disorder that presents with photophobia in many patients during attacks. Furthermore, some patients with migraine experience constant photophobia, even during headache-free intervals, leading to a compromised quality of life. METHODS: This prospective, case-control study included 40 patients with migraine (18 male and 22 female) who were recruited at an eye hospital and eye clinic. The patients were divided into two groups: migraine with photophobia group, consisting of 22 patients (10 male and 12 female) with constant photophobia, and migraine without photophobia group, consisting of 18 patients (eight male and 10 female) without constant photophobia. We used 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography to compare cerebral glucose metabolism between the two patient groups and 42 healthy participants (16 men and 26 women). RESULTS: Compared with the healthy group, both the migraine with photophobia and migraine without photophobia groups showed cerebral glucose hypermetabolism in the bilateral thalamus (p < 0.05, family-wise error-corrected). Moreover, the contrast of migraine with photophobia minus migraine without photophobia patients showed glucose hypermetabolism in the bilateral medial thalamus (p < 0.05, family-wise error-corrected). CONCLUSIONS: The medial thalamus may be associated with the development of continuous photophobia in patients with migraine.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders , Photophobia , Positron-Emission Tomography , Humans , Photophobia/etiology , Photophobia/physiopathology , Male , Female , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Migraine Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Thalamus/diagnostic imaging , Thalamus/physiopathology , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Glucose/metabolism , Young Adult
3.
J Headache Pain ; 25(1): 75, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724972

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: GABA, a key inhibitory neurotransmitter, has synaptic and extrasynaptic receptors on the postsynaptic neuron. Background GABA, which spills over from the synaptic cleft, acts on extrasynaptic delta subunit containing GABAA receptors. The role of extrasynaptic GABAergic input in migraine is unknown. We investigated the susceptibility to valid migraine-provoking substances with clinically relevant behavioral readouts in Genetic Absence Epilepsy of Rats Strasbourg (GAERS), in which the GABAergic tonus was altered. Subsequently, we screened relevant GABAergic mechanisms in Wistar rats by pharmacological means to identify the mechanisms. METHODS: Wistar and GAERS rats were administered nitroglycerin (10 mg/kg) or levcromakalim (1 mg/kg). Mechanical allodynia and photophobia were assessed using von Frey monofilaments and a dark-light box. Effects of GAT-1 blocker tiagabine (5 mg/kg), GABAB receptor agonist baclofen (2 mg/kg), synaptic GABAA receptor agonist diazepam (1 mg/kg), extrasynaptic GABAA receptor agonists gaboxadol (4 mg/kg), and muscimol (0.75 mg/kg), T-type calcium channel blocker ethosuximide (100 mg/kg) or synaptic GABAA receptor antagonist flumazenil (15 mg/kg) on levcromakalim-induced migraine phenotype were screened. RESULTS: Unlike Wistar rats, GAERS exhibited no reduction in mechanical pain thresholds or light aversion following nitroglycerin or levcromakalim injection. Ethosuximide did not reverse the resistant phenotype in GAERS, excluding the role of T-type calcium channel dysfunction in this phenomenon. Tiagabine prevented levcromakalim-induced mechanical allodynia in Wistar rats, suggesting a key role in enhanced GABA spillover. Baclofen did not alleviate mechanical allodynia. Diazepam failed to mitigate levcromakalim-induced migraine phenotype. Additionally, the resistant phenotype in GAERS was not affected by flumazenil. Extrasynaptic GABAA receptor agonists gaboxadol and muscimol inhibited periorbital allodynia in Wistar rats. CONCLUSION: Our study introduced a rat strain resistant to migraine-provoking agents and signified a critical involvement of extrasynaptic δGABAergic receptors. Extrasynaptic δ GABAA receptors, by mediating constant background inhibition on the excitability of neurons, stand as a novel drug target with a therapeutic potential in migraine.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders , Phenotype , Rats, Wistar , Receptors, GABA-A , Animals , Migraine Disorders/metabolism , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Rats , Receptors, GABA-A/drug effects , Receptors, GABA-A/metabolism , Male , Disease Models, Animal , Hyperalgesia/drug therapy , Hyperalgesia/metabolism , Epilepsy, Absence/drug therapy , Epilepsy, Absence/physiopathology , Nitroglycerin/pharmacology , Nitroglycerin/toxicity , Photophobia/etiology , Photophobia/physiopathology
4.
Headache ; 62(1): 4-10, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35041220

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In this narrative review, we summarize clinical and experimental data on the effect of light in migraine and discuss future prospects. BACKGROUND: Effective nonpharmacological treatment of hypersensitivity to light in migraine is an unmet clinical need. Current management strategies primarily consist of seeking a dark room and avoiding light exposure. Advances in the past 2 decades have improved our understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of how migraine is influenced by light. This may provide promising avenues for novel approaches in clinical management. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE for articles published from database inception up to September 1, 2021. We used the search term "migraine" with the search terms "light," "photophobia," "treatment," "trigger," "circadian rhythm," "environment," and/or "pathophysiology." RESULTS: Light is commonly reported as a trigger factor of migraine attacks, however, early manifestation of photophobia and false attribution is likely the actual cause based on data deriving from retrospective, prospective, and experimental studies. The most common photophobia symptoms in migraine are exacerbation of headache by light and abnormal sensitivity to light with the underlying neural pathways likely being dependent on ongoing activity in the trigeminovascular system. Clinical studies and experimental models have identified mediators of photophobia and uncovered narrow wavebands of the light spectrum that may reduce pain intensity during a migraine attack. Consequently, novel devices have undergone exploratory clinical trials with promising results. CONCLUSION: False attribution is likely the reason why light is commonly reported as a trigger factor of migraine attacks, and a prospective confirmation is required to prevent unnecessary avoidance. The observation that individuals with migraine are not equally photophobic to all wavebands of the light spectrum opens the potential for innovative pain management strategies. In this context, using human-centric lighting (also called integrative lighting) to mimic the natural daylight cycle and avoid harmful wavebands through modern technology may prove beneficial. Future research should identify direct and indirect consequences of light and other environmental factors in migraine to fill out knowledge gaps and enable evidence-based care strategies within institutions, work environments, and other settings.


Subject(s)
Light , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Photophobia/physiopathology , Humans , Migraine Disorders/etiology , Migraine Disorders/therapy , Photophobia/etiology , Photophobia/therapy
5.
Epilepsia ; 62(2): e42-e47, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33465245

ABSTRACT

A reliable identification of a high-risk state for upcoming seizures may allow for preemptive treatment and improve the quality of patients' lives. We evaluated the ability of prodromal symptoms to predict preictal states using a machine learning (ML) approach. Twenty-four patients with drug-resistant epilepsy were admitted for continuous video-electroencephalographic monitoring and filled out a daily four-point questionnaire on prodromal symptoms. Data were then classified into (1) a preictal group for questionnaires completed in a 24-h period prior to at least one seizure (n1  = 58) and (2) an interictal group for questionnaires completed in a 24-h period without seizures (n2  = 190). Our prediction model was based on a support vector machine classifier and compared to a Fisher's linear classifier. The combination of all the prodromal symptoms yielded a good prediction performance (area under the curve [AUC] = .72, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .61-.81). This performance was significantly enhanced by selecting a subset of the most relevant symptoms (AUC = .80, 95% CI = .69-.88). In comparison, the linear classifier systematically failed (AUCs < .6). Our findings indicate that the ML analysis of prodromal symptoms is a promising approach to identifying preictal states prior to seizures. This could pave the way for development of clinical strategies in seizure prevention and even a noninvasive alarm system.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistant Epilepsy/physiopathology , Prodromal Symptoms , Seizures/physiopathology , Support Vector Machine , Adult , Affect/physiology , Area Under Curve , Attention/physiology , Comprehension/physiology , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/therapy , Electroencephalography , Female , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Humans , Machine Learning , Male , Middle Aged , Noise , Photophobia/physiopathology , Reading , Seizures/prevention & control , Speech/physiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tinnitus/physiopathology , Video Recording , Vision Disorders/physiopathology , Young Adult
6.
Retina ; 41(6): 1302-1308, 2021 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33323904

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Human photoreceptors are sensitive to infrared light (IR). This sensitivity can be used as a novel indicator of retinal function. Diabetic retinopathy patients were assessed using in vivo two-photon excitation and compared their scotopic IR threshold with that of healthy patients. METHODS: Sixty-two participants, 28 healthy and 34 with diabetic retinopathy, underwent a comprehensive eye examination, where visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were assessed. Infrared thresholds were measured in the fovea and parafovea following 30-minute dark adaptation. A two-photon excitation device was used with integrated pulsed laser light (1,045 nm) for sensitivity testing and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy for fundus imaging. RESULTS: The mean Snellen visual acuity of diabetic patients (6/7.7) was worse than that of the healthy patients (6/5.5), which was significantly different (P < 0.001). Disease patients had decreased contrast sensitivity, especially at 6 and 18 cycles/degree. The mean retinal sensitivity to IR light in eyes with diabetic retinopathy (11.6 ± 2.0 dB) was significantly (P < 0.001) lower than that in normal eyes (15.5 ± 1.3 dB). CONCLUSION: Compared with healthy control subjects, the IR light sensitivity of diabetic patients was significantly impaired. Two-photon measurements can be used in the assessment of retinal disease, but further studies are needed to validate IR light stimulation in various stages of diabetic retinopathy.


Subject(s)
Dark Adaptation/physiology , Diabetic Retinopathy/physiopathology , Infrared Rays , Photophobia/physiopathology , Photoreceptor Cells/physiology , Visual Acuity , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Female , Fovea Centralis/diagnostic imaging , Fovea Centralis/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ophthalmoscopy/methods , Photophobia/diagnosis , Pilot Projects , Visual Field Tests/methods
7.
Headache ; 60(8): 1644-1652, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32789863

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: People with migraine exhibit postural control impairments. These patients also have an increased light sensitivity due to the disease, and it remains during the headache-free period. It is currently unknown if increased lighting levels can alter the balance control, especially in individuals with visual hypersensitivity, such as migraineurs. This study aimed to assess the balance and photophobia of women with migraine and non-headache controls under different light conditions. METHODS: This cross-sectional study consisted of 14 women with migraine (mean ± SD 30.6 ± 8.1 years old) and 14 women without any kind of headache (mean ± SD 27.2 ± 2.8 years old) screened from a tertiary headache clinical hospital and the local community. Quiet standing balance was evaluated during bipodal and unipodal support, under 3 light conditions: ambient (AMB) - 270 lx, visual discomfort threshold (VDT) - 400 lx, and intense visual discomfort (IVD) - 2000 lx. Sway area of the center of pressure was processed and compared between groups. The association of migraine with the risk of presenting a greater imbalance in the discomfort lighting conditions was verified. RESULTS: Compared to the non-headache controls, the migraine group presented greater sway area in bipodal stance under the 3 light conditions (mean difference (95% CI)): AMB 0.81 cm2 (0.19 to 1.43), P = .011; VDT 3.17 cm2 (0.74 to 5.60), P = .001; IVD 5.56 cm2 (2.75 to 8.37), P < .0001. Within-subject analysis showed increased sway area in bipodal stance among all lighting conditions for the migraine group only (mean difference (95% CI)): VDT-AMB 2.20 cm2 (0.23 to 4.18), P = .024; IVD-AMB 4.50 cm2 (2.38 to 6.62), P < .0001, IVD-VDT 2.29 cm2 (0.57 to 4.01), P = .005. The Prevalence Ratio (PR) analysis showed that migraine was associated with the risk of presenting greater imbalance in both bipodal and unipodal standing conditions for both VDT (PR value (95% CI) - bipodal: PR = 4.00 (1.02 to 15.59), P = .045; unipodal: PR = 4.00 (1.43 to 11.15), P = .008), and the IVD (bipodal: PR = 3.33 (1.13 to 9.58), P = .025; unipodal: PR = 5.50 (1.48 to 20.42), P = .010) lighting conditions. CONCLUSION: Photophobia might be a disturbing factor that worsens the balance of patients with migraine during the quiet standing posture.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Photophobia/physiopathology , Postural Balance/physiology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Migraine Disorders/complications , Photophobia/etiology , Young Adult
8.
Headache ; 60(3): 506-514, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31965576

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Migraine with aura (MwA) is associated with increased brain hyper-responsiveness to visual stimuli and increased visual network connectivity relative to migraine without aura (MwoA). Despite this, prior studies have provided conflicting results regarding whether MwA is associated with higher photophobia symptom scores compared to MwoA. The relationships between MwA and other types of sensory hypersensitivity, such as phonophobia and cutaneous allodynia (CA), have not been previously investigated. The purpose of this cross-sectional observational study was to investigate whether MwA is associated with greater symptoms of photophobia, phonophobia, and CA compared to MwoA. METHODS: This analysis included 321 migraine patients (146 MwA; 175 MwoA) who had been enrolled into the American Registry for Migraine Research. The diagnosis of either MwoA or MwA was determined by headache specialists using ICHD diagnostic criteria. Patients completed the Photosensitivity Assessment Questionnaire, the Hyperacusis Questionnaire, and the Allodynia Symptom Checklist. Mean or median values were compared between groups. Regression models were created to analyze the relationship between MwA with photophobia scores, hyperacusis scores, and the presence of interictal CA. RESULTS: Those with MwA had higher mean photophobia scores than those with MwoA (4.1 vs 3.0, P = .0003). MwA was positively associated with photophobia symptom severity (B = 0.50 [SE = 0.14], P = .0003), after controlling for age, patient sex, and headache frequency. Aura was not associated with hyperacusis symptom severity (B = 0.07 [SE = 0.08], P = .346) or the presence of interictal CA (OR 1.33 [95% CI 0.70-2.53], P = .381). CONCLUSION: MwA is associated with higher photophobia symptom scores compared to MwoA. Aura is not associated with greater hyperacusis or interictal allodynia scores. These findings complement prior imaging and neurophysiologic studies that demonstrated MwA to be associated with hyper-responsiveness of brain visual processing regions. The findings suggest that MwA is associated specifically with visual hypersensitivity, as opposed to being associated with a general hypersensitivity to multiple types of sensory stimuli.


Subject(s)
Hyperacusis/physiopathology , Hyperalgesia/physiopathology , Migraine with Aura/physiopathology , Migraine without Aura/physiopathology , Photophobia/physiopathology , Registries , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Hyperacusis/etiology , Hyperalgesia/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Migraine with Aura/complications , Migraine without Aura/complications , Photophobia/etiology , Self Report , Severity of Illness Index , United States
9.
Headache ; 60(2): 337-347, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31755111

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The American Registry for Migraine Research (ARMR) is a multicenter, prospective, longitudinal patient registry, biorepository, and neuroimaging repository that collects clinical data, electronic health record (EHR) data, blood samples, and brain imaging data from individuals with migraine or other headache types. In this manuscript, we outline ARMR research methods and report baseline data describing an initial cohort of ARMR participants. METHODS: Adults with any International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) diagnosis were prospectively enrolled from one of the 8 participating headache specialty centers. At baseline, ARMR participants complete web-based questionnaires, clinicians enter the participant's ICHD diagnoses, an optional blood specimen is collected, and neuroimaging data are uploaded to the ARMR neuroimaging repository. Participants maintain the ARMR daily headache diary longitudinally and follow-up questionnaires are completed by participants every 3 months. EHR data are integrated into the ARMR database from a subset of ARMR sites. Herein, we describe the ARMR methodology and report the summary data from ARMR participants who had, from February 2016 to May 2019, completed at least 1 baseline questionnaire from which data are reported in this manuscript. Descriptive statistics are used to provide an overview of patient's sociodemographics, headache diagnoses, headache characteristics, most bothersome symptoms other than headache, headache-related disability, comorbidities, and treatments. RESULTS: Data were available from 996 ARMR participants, enrolled from Mayo Clinic Arizona, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, University of Utah, University of Colorado, Thomas Jefferson University, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Georgetown University Medical Center, and DENT Neurological Institute. Among ARMR participants, 86.7% (n = 864) were female and the mean age at the time of enrollment was 48.6 years (±13.9; range 18-84). The most common provider-reported diagnosis was chronic migraine (n = 622), followed by migraine without aura (n = 327), migraine with aura (n = 196), and medication overuse headache (n = 65). Average headache frequency was 19.1 ± 9.2 days per month (n = 751), with 68% reporting at least 15 headache days per month. Sensitivity to light was the most frequent (n = 222) most bothersome symptom overall, other than headache, but when present, cognitive dysfunction was most frequently (n = 157) the most bothersome symptom other than headache. Average migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) score was 52 ± 49 (n = 760), (very severe headache-related disability); however, 17% of the ARMR population had MIDAS scores suggesting "no" or "mild" disability. The most common non-headache health issues were allergies (n = 364), back pain (n = 296), neck pain (n = 296), depression (n = 292), and anxiety (n = 278). Nearly 85% (n = 695) of patients were using preventive medications and 24.7% were using non-medication preventive therapy (eg, vitamins and neuromodulation). The most common preventive medication classes were neurotoxins, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, vitamins/supplements, and anticalcitonin gene-related peptide ligand or receptor-targeted monoclonal antibodies. Nearly 90% (n = 734) of ARMR participants was taking medications to treat migraine attacks, with the most common classes being triptans, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antiemetics, acetaminophen, and combination analgesics. CONCLUSIONS: ARMR is a source of real-world patient data, biospecimens, and brain neuroimaging data that provides comprehensive insight into patients with migraine and other headache types being seen in headache specialty clinics in the United States. ARMR data will allow for longitudinal and advanced analytics that are expected to lead to a better characterization of patient heterogeneity, healthcare resource utilization, identification of endophenotypes, factors that predict treatment outcomes and clinical course, and ultimately advance the field toward precision headache medicine.


Subject(s)
Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Headache Disorders, Secondary , Migraine with Aura , Migraine without Aura , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biological Specimen Banks/statistics & numerical data , Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology , Cognitive Dysfunction/physiopathology , Female , Headache Disorders, Secondary/complications , Headache Disorders, Secondary/physiopathology , Headache Disorders, Secondary/therapy , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Migraine with Aura/complications , Migraine with Aura/physiopathology , Migraine with Aura/therapy , Migraine without Aura/complications , Migraine without Aura/physiopathology , Migraine without Aura/therapy , Neuroimaging/statistics & numerical data , Photophobia/etiology , Photophobia/physiopathology , Self Report , Severity of Illness Index , Young Adult
10.
Doc Ophthalmol ; 140(3): 279-287, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31900741

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Pregabalin binds to the α2-δ1/α2-δ2 subunits of the voltage-gated L-type calcium channel (LTCC), which is expressed in rod/cone photoreceptor terminals. The purpose of this report was to describe electroretinographic abnormalities associated with pregabalin treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: This is an observational case report. A 49-year-old female reported photophobia and night blindness in her left eye after 10 months of pregabalin administration. One month after the symptoms, ophthalmic examinations were performed, which revealed good visual acuity and no remarkable fundus findings. However, full-field electroretinography (ERG) of the left eye revealed a decreased b-wave in rod ERG, a slightly decreased a-wave and severely decreased b-wave (negative ERG) in bright flash ERG, decreased a- and b-waves in cone ERG, and decreased b-waves in 30-Hz flicker ERG. These findings are similar to those seen in incomplete congenital stationary night blindness, whereas the right eye ERG showed normal responses, except for a square a-wave in cone ERG. The ERG gradually improved from 1 to 12 months after discontinuing pregabalin. Finally, b-waves in bright flash ERG and cone ERG responses largely recovered, but b-waves in rod ERG and a-waves in bright flash ERG only partially recovered in the left eye. The square a-wave recovered to normal in the right eye. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report to indicate that ERG abnormalities might be associated with pregabalin treatment. Our results suggest that pregabalin may affect LTCC function via the α2-δ1/α2-δ2 subunits, which leads to defective synaptic transmission from rod/cone photoreceptors to bipolar cells.


Subject(s)
Calcium Channel Blockers/adverse effects , Electroretinography/drug effects , Night Blindness/chemically induced , Photophobia/chemically induced , Pregabalin/adverse effects , Retinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells/physiology , Calcium Channels, L-Type , Dark Adaptation , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Night Blindness/physiopathology , Photophobia/physiopathology , Visual Acuity/physiology
11.
J Neuroophthalmol ; 40(1): 67-73, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31895071

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Craniofacial autonomic signs and symptoms (CASS) are relatively underrecognized in the evaluation of migraine headache. Yet, these features provide insight into diagnostic criterion, therapeutic approaches, and overarching disease burden. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: This review aims to summarize relevant literature evaluating autonomic dysfunction, with focus on CASS, in migraine through targeted literature searches in PubMed. Full articles of original data published between 1974 and 2019 were identified using MeSH terms with no search limits. RESULTS: Although CASS are typically clinically evaluated by subjective patient report, investigational measures of cranial autonomic function have identified marked distinctions between headache attack and attack-free intervals. The presence of CASS during an attack does not differ based on age, sex, or presence of aura. Unilateral CASS may be predictive of longer, more frequent, and/or severe attacks and often co-occur with sensory dysfunction such as allodynia and photophobia. Although limited research has been performed to evaluate targeted therapeutics for migraine with CASS, triptans and onabotulinumtoxinA may demonstrate greater effects in this group. CONCLUSIONS: Migraine remains a debilitating disorder with significant community-wide impacts, necessitating continued evaluation of contributing features. Consideration of CASS provides important insight into potential treatment approaches and the effectiveness of novel therapeutic interventions aimed at improving overall disease burden. However, further investigation is needed to fully understand primary craniofacial features in migraine, and how these might inform individualized treatment decisions.


Subject(s)
Autonomic Nervous System Diseases/physiopathology , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Photophobia/physiopathology , Autonomic Nervous System Diseases/therapy , Disease Management , Humans , Migraine Disorders/therapy , Prognosis
12.
Neurobiol Learn Mem ; 165: 106817, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29476821

ABSTRACT

Behavioral phenotyping is a crucial step in validating animal models of human disease. Most traditional behavioral analyses rely on investigator observation of animal subjects, which can be confounded by inter-observer variability, scoring consistency, and the ability to observe extremely rapid, small, or repetitive movements. Force-Plate Actimeter (FPA)-based assessments can quantify locomotor activity and detailed motor activity with an incredibly rich data stream that can reveal details of movement unobservable by the naked eye. This report describes four specific examples of FPA analysis of behavior that have been useful in specific rat or mouse models of human neurological disease, which show how FPA analysis can be used to capture and quantify specific features of the complex behavioral phenotypes of these animal models. The first example quantifies nociceptive behavior of the rat following injection of formalin into the footpad as a common model of persistent inflammatory pain. The second uses actimetry to quantify intense, rapid circling behaviors in a transgenic mouse that overexpresses human laminin α5, a basement membrane protein. The third example assesses place preference behaviors in a rat model of migraine headache modeling phonophobia and photophobia. In the fourth example, FPA analysis revealed a unique movement signature emerged with age in a digenic mutant mouse model of Tourette Syndrome. Taken together, these approaches demonstrate the power and usefulness of the FPA in the examination and quantification of minute details of motor behaviors, greatly expanding the scope and detail of behavioral phenotyping of preclinical models of human disease.


Subject(s)
Movement/physiology , Nervous System Diseases/physiopathology , Animals , Cumulative Trauma Disorders/physiopathology , Disease Models, Animal , Female , Humans , Hyperacusis/physiopathology , Hyperkinesis/physiopathology , Male , Mice , Nociception/physiology , Photophobia/physiopathology , Rats
13.
Cephalalgia ; 39(13): 1710-1719, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31466456

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The clinical picture, but also neuroimaging findings, suggested the brainstem and midbrain structures as possible driving or generating structures in migraine. FINDINGS: This has been intensely discussed in the last decades and the advent of modern imaging studies refined the involvement of rostral parts of the pons in acute migraine attacks, but more importantly suggested a predominant role of the hypothalamus and alterations in hypothalamic functional connectivity shortly before the beginning of migraine headaches. This was shown in the NO-triggered and also in the preictal stage of native human migraine attacks. Another headache type that is clinically even more suggestive of hypothalamic involvement is cluster headache, and indeed a structure in close proximity to the hypothalamus has been identified to play a crucial role in attack generation. CONCLUSION: It is very likely that spontaneous oscillations of complex networks involving the hypothalamus, brainstem, and dopaminergic networks lead to changes in susceptibility thresholds that ultimately start but also terminate headache attacks. We will review clinical and neuroscience evidence that puts the hypothalamus in the center of scientific attention when attack generation is discussed.


Subject(s)
Headache/physiopathology , Hypothalamus/physiopathology , Autonomic Nervous System/physiopathology , Brain Stem/physiopathology , Craving/physiology , Dopamine/physiology , Emotions , Endocrine System/physiopathology , Humans , Migraine Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Nitric Oxide/physiology , Nociception/physiology , Pain Perception/physiology , Photophobia/physiopathology , Prodromal Symptoms
14.
Cephalalgia ; 39(13): 1720-1727, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31615269

ABSTRACT

AIM: To describe neuronal networks underlying commonly reported migraine premonitory symptoms and to discuss how these might precipitate migraine pain. BACKGROUND: Migraine headache is frequently preceded by a distinct and well characterized premonitory phase including symptoms like yawning, sleep disturbances, alterations in appetite and food intake and hypersensitivity to certain external stimuli. Recent neuroimaging studies strongly suggest the hypothalamus as the key mediator of the premonitory phase and also suggested alterations in hypothalamic networks as a mechanism of migraine attack generation. When looking at the vast evidence from basic research within the last decades, hypothalamic and thalamic networks are most likely to integrate peripheral influences with central mechanisms, facilitating the precipitation of migraine headaches. These networks include sleep, feeding and stress modulating centers within the hypothalamus, thalamic pathways and brainstem centers closely involved in trigeminal pain processing such as the spinal trigeminal nucleus and the rostral ventromedial medulla, all of which are closely interconnected. CONCLUSION: Taken together, these networks represent the pathophysiological basis for migraine premonitory symptoms as well as a possible integration site of peripheral so-called "triggers" with central attack facilitating processes.


Subject(s)
Migraine without Aura/physiopathology , Prodromal Symptoms , Affect , Appetite/physiology , Brain Stem/physiopathology , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Craving/physiology , Eating , Homeostasis , Humans , Migraine without Aura/complications , Migraine without Aura/etiology , Migraine without Aura/psychology , Nerve Net/physiopathology , Neuroimaging , Neurotransmitter Agents/physiology , Nitric Oxide/physiology , Photophobia/etiology , Photophobia/physiopathology , Physical Stimulation/adverse effects , Sleep Stages/physiology , Suprachiasmatic Nucleus/physiopathology , Thalamus/physiopathology
15.
Cephalalgia ; 39(13): 1623-1634, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29940781

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To review clinical and pre-clinical evidence supporting the role of visual pathways, from the eye to the cortex, in the development of photophobia in headache disorders. BACKGROUND: Photophobia is a poorly understood light-induced phenomenon that emerges in a variety of neurological and ophthalmological conditions. Over the years, multiple mechanisms have been proposed to explain its causes; however, scarce research and lack of systematic assessment of photophobia in patients has made the search for answers quite challenging. In the field of headaches, significant progress has been made recently on how specific visual networks contribute to photophobia features such as light-induced intensification of headache, increased perception of brightness and visual discomfort, which are frequently experienced by migraineurs. Such progress improved our understanding of the phenomenon and points to abnormal processing of light by both cone/rod-mediated image-forming and melanopsin-mediated non-image-forming visual pathways, and the consequential transfer of photic signals to multiple brain regions involved in sensory, autonomic and emotional regulation. CONCLUSION: Photophobia phenotype is diverse, and the relative contribution of visual, trigeminal and autonomic systems may depend on the disease it emerges from. In migraine, photophobia could result from photic activation of retina-driven pathways involved in the regulation of homeostasis, making its association with headache more complex than previously thought.


Subject(s)
Headache/physiopathology , Photophobia/physiopathology , Visual Pathways/physiopathology , Animals , Blindness/physiopathology , Brain Stem/physiopathology , Color , Headache/complications , Humans , Light/adverse effects , Mesencephalon/physiopathology , Mice , Migraine Disorders/complications , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Photic Stimulation/adverse effects , Photophobia/etiology , Retinal Ganglion Cells/physiology , Retinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells/physiology , Retinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells/radiation effects , Rod Opsins/physiology , Somatosensory Cortex/physiopathology , Thalamus/physiopathology
16.
Cephalalgia ; 39(13): 1675-1682, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30079744

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To review and discuss the literature on the role of thalamic structure and function in migraine. DISCUSSION: The thalamus holds an important position in our understanding of allodynia, central sensitization and photophobia in migraine. Structural and functional findings suggest abnormal functional connectivity between the thalamus and various cortical regions pointing towards an altered pain processing in migraine. Pharmacological nociceptive modulation suggests that the thalamus is a potential drug target. CONCLUSION: A critical role for the thalamus in migraine-related allodynia and photophobia is well established. Additionally, the thalamus is most likely involved in the dysfunctional pain modulation and processing in migraine, but further research is needed to clarify the exact clinical implications of these findings.


Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Sensitization/physiology , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Analgesics/pharmacology , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Brain Mapping , Cerebral Cortex/physiopathology , Connectome , Emotions/physiology , Humans , Hyperalgesia/etiology , Hyperalgesia/physiopathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Migraine Disorders/complications , Migraine Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Migraine Disorders/pathology , Neural Pathways/physiopathology , Nociception/physiology , Organ Size , Pain Perception/physiology , Photophobia/etiology , Photophobia/physiopathology , Positron-Emission Tomography , Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , Thalamic Nuclei/physiopathology , Thalamus/diagnostic imaging , Thalamus/drug effects , Thalamus/pathology , Thalamus/physiopathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
18.
Headache ; 59(5): 727-740, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30737783

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the ictal symptoms, interictal symptoms, psychiatric comorbidities, and interictal neuro-otologic examination findings in vestibular migraine (VM). METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 491 patients seen from August 2014 until March 2018 at a tertiary neurology referral center for vestibular disorders to identify patients fulfilling the 2012 VM criteria. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-one patients (105 women) were identified. Mean age of VM onset was 44.3 (±13.7) years. Preceding the onset of vestibular symptoms, most had migraine (57.3%) and motion sickness (61.1%). It was common to have a family history of migraine (50.8%) and episodic vestibular symptoms (28.1%). Common ictal symptoms were triggered (visually induced and head-motion) and spontaneous vertigo, accompanied by photophobia and phonophobia (118/131 [90.1%] patients), nausea (105/131 [80.2%] patients), aural symptoms (79/131 [60.3%] patients), and headache (65/131 [49.6%] patients). Interictally, many experienced visually induced (116/131 [88.6%] patients), head-motion (86/131 [65.6%] patients), and persistent (67/131 [51.1%] patients) dizziness. Psychiatric comorbidities include anxiety (92/131 [70.2%] patients), depression (53/131 [40.5%] patients), insomnia (38/131 [29.0%] patients), phobic disorders (15/131 [11.5%] patients), and psychogenic disorders (11/131 [8.4%] patients). Common triggers were stress (52/131 [39.7%] patients), bright lights (35/131 [26.7%] patients), weather changes (34/131 [26.0%] patients), and sleep deprivation (34/131 [26.0%] patients). Interictal neuro-otologic examination was abnormal in 56/131 (42.7%), usually hyperventilation-induced, head-shaking-induced, vibration-induced, and positional nystagmus. The most common balance-test finding was impaired sharpened Romberg's test (22/130 [16.9%] patients). CONCLUSIONS: In this single center study, we found that VM typically affects women in their 40s, with a personal and family history of migraine. Typical ictal symptoms were triggered and spontaneous vertigo, associated with photophobia and phonophobia, nausea, aural symptoms, and headache. Interictal vestibular symptoms, comorbid psychiatric disorders, and non-specific interictal neuro-otologic findings were common.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Neurologic Examination/methods , Vestibular Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Vestibular Diseases/physiopathology , Adult , Female , Humans , Hyperacusis/diagnostic imaging , Hyperacusis/epidemiology , Hyperacusis/physiopathology , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Migraine Disorders/epidemiology , Photophobia/diagnostic imaging , Photophobia/epidemiology , Photophobia/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Vertigo/diagnostic imaging , Vertigo/epidemiology , Vertigo/physiopathology , Vestibular Diseases/epidemiology
19.
J Neuroophthalmol ; 39(1): 94-102, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30762717

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Photophobia is commonly associated with migraine, meningitis, concussion, and a variety of ocular diseases. Advances in our ability to trace multiple brain pathways through which light information is processed have paved the way to a better understanding of the neurobiology of photophobia and the complexity of the symptoms triggered by light. PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to summarize recent anatomical and physiological studies on the neurobiology of photophobia with emphasis on migraine. RECENT FINDINGS: Observations made in blind and seeing migraine patients, and in a variety of animal models, have led to the discovery of a novel retino-thalamo-cortical pathway that carries photic signal from melanopsinergic and nonmelanopsinergic retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) to thalamic neurons. Activity of these neurons is driven by migraine and their axonal projections convey signals about headache and light to multiple cortical areas involved in the generation of common migraine symptoms. Novel projections of RGCs into previously unidentified hypothalamic neurons that regulate parasympathetic and sympathetic functions have also been discovered. Finally, recent work has led to a novel understanding of color preference in migraine-type photophobia and of the roles played by the retina, thalamus, and cortex. SUMMARY: The findings provide a neural substrate for understanding the complexity of aversion to light in patients with migraine and neuro-ophthalmologic other disorders.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Cortex/physiopathology , Migraine Disorders/complications , Neural Pathways/physiopathology , Photophobia/etiology , Retinal Ganglion Cells/physiology , Thalamus/physiopathology , Animals , Humans , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Photophobia/physiopathology
20.
Clin Genet ; 93(4): 721-730, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28543186

ABSTRACT

Sjögren-Larsson syndrome (SLS) is caused by an autosomal recessive mutation in ALDH3A2, which encodes the fatty aldehyde dehydrogenase responsible for the metabolism of long-chain aliphatic aldehydes and alcohols. The pathophysiologic accumulation of aldehydes in various organs, including the skin, brain, and eyes, leads to characteristic features of ichthyosis, intellectual disability, spastic di-/quadriplegia, and low visual acuity with photophobia. The severity of the clinical manifestations thereof can vary greatly, although most patients are bound to a wheelchair due to contractures. To date, correlations between genotype and phenotype have proven difficult to document due to low disease incidence and high heterogenetic variability in mutations. This review summarizes the clinical characteristics of SLS that have been found to contribute to the prognosis thereof, as well as recent updates from genetic and brain imaging studies. In addition, the differential diagnoses of SLS are briefly illustrated, covering cerebral palsy and other genetic or neurocutaneous syndromes mimicking the syndrome.


Subject(s)
Brain/metabolism , Cerebral Palsy/genetics , Intellectual Disability/genetics , Sjogren-Larsson Syndrome/genetics , Aldehyde Oxidoreductases/genetics , Brain/pathology , Cerebral Palsy/diagnosis , Cerebral Palsy/pathology , Humans , Intellectual Disability/diagnosis , Intellectual Disability/pathology , Mutation , Phenotype , Photophobia/genetics , Photophobia/physiopathology , Sjogren-Larsson Syndrome/diagnosis , Sjogren-Larsson Syndrome/pathology , Skin , Visual Acuity/genetics , Visual Acuity/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL