Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.439
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Cell ; 184(20): 5151-5162.e11, 2021 09 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34520724

ABSTRACT

The heartbeat is initiated by voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1.5, which opens rapidly and triggers the cardiac action potential; however, the structural basis for pore opening remains unknown. Here, we blocked fast inactivation with a mutation and captured the elusive open-state structure. The fast inactivation gate moves away from its receptor, allowing asymmetric opening of pore-lining S6 segments, which bend and rotate at their intracellular ends to dilate the activation gate to ∼10 Å diameter. Molecular dynamics analyses predict physiological rates of Na+ conductance. The open-state pore blocker propafenone binds in a high-affinity pose, and drug-access pathways are revealed through the open activation gate and fenestrations. Comparison with mutagenesis results provides a structural map of arrhythmia mutations that target the activation and fast inactivation gates. These results give atomic-level insights into molecular events that underlie generation of the action potential, open-state drug block, and fast inactivation of cardiac sodium channels, which initiate the heartbeat.


Subject(s)
NAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel/chemistry , NAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel/metabolism , Animals , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/genetics , Cryoelectron Microscopy , HEK293 Cells , Heart Rate/drug effects , Humans , Ion Channel Gating , Models, Molecular , Molecular Dynamics Simulation , Mutation/genetics , Myocardium , NAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel/isolation & purification , NAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel/ultrastructure , Propafenone/pharmacology , Protein Conformation , Rats , Sodium/metabolism , Time Factors , Water/chemistry
2.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol ; 29(2): e13111, 2024 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38439207

ABSTRACT

Diazepam poisoning is a common emergency situation, but propafenone poisoning is relatively rare. We reported a case of propafenone poisoning combined with diazepam. An 18-year-old female patient was admitted to our hospital with an overdose of oral propafenone and diazepam. The patient was treated with medication that proved to be useful, but the sinus rhythm could not be recovered, and cardiac arrest occurred. A bipolar temporary pacemaker and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were installed. However, even with multiple electrode positions, effective capture could not be achieved. The patient eventually died. We should be alert to the possibility of co-poisoning.


Subject(s)
Diazepam , Propafenone , Female , Humans , Adolescent , Diazepam/therapeutic use , Suicidal Ideation , Electrocardiography , Electrodes
3.
Postgrad Med J ; 100(1186): 584-591, 2024 Jul 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38507113

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite previous concerns about ocular side effects related to amiodarone, the relationship between amiodarone and cataract remains uncertain. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the potential association between amiodarone use and the subsequent risk of cataract, taking into account potential confounders. METHODS: This population-based, active comparator-controlled cohort study utilized the data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance program and involved adults over 40 years old between 2001 and 2013. We analyzed 12 055 new amiodarone users and contrasted them with a propafenone user cohort. The primary outcome was the incidence of cataract. Inverse-probability treatment-weighting (IPTW) was further used to eliminate the potential confounding effects, and Cox proportional-hazard regression analyses were performed to calculate the risk of cataract. Serial subgroup analyses were also performed. RESULTS: In the main analysis, amiodarone users did not exhibit a significant causal relationship in both full cohort [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.994, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.913-1.082] and IPTW cohort (IPTW-aHR 0.977, 95% CI: 0.900-1.060). Furthermore, it is important to highlight a significantly reduced risk of cataract among patients with heart failure (IPTW-aHR 0.708, 95% CI: 0.554-0.905) and during the 2-year follow-up period (IPTW-aHR 0.889, 95% CI: 0.794-0.996), implying potential advantages linked to the use of amiodarone. CONCLUSIONS: The study found no increased risk of cataract with amiodarone, one of the most frequently used antiarrhythmic medications, compared to the use of propafenone. Future research is recommended to explore potential mechanisms and their implications for clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Amiodarone , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents , Cataract , Humans , Amiodarone/adverse effects , Male , Female , Cataract/chemically induced , Cataract/epidemiology , Taiwan/epidemiology , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Aged , Incidence , Adult , Risk Factors , Proportional Hazards Models , Cohort Studies , Propafenone/adverse effects
4.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(10)2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38791240

ABSTRACT

Propafenone (PPF) belongs to the class 1C antiarrhythmics and can cause electrocardiogram-associated adverse/toxic effects. Cases of PPF intoxication are rarely investigated. We developed a novel and selective GC-MS/MS method for the determination of PPF and its tissue distribution in an intentional fatal poisoning case, which is applicable to PPF quantification in the range of therapeutic to lethal concentrations in complex post-mortem samples. A simple and effective sample pretreatment was applied to all analyzed samples. PPF was determined without the need for dilution, even in highly complex samples containing a wide range of analyte concentrations. Quantification was performed using the standard addition method, developed and validated according to the ICH M10 guidelines. The obtained results indicated that the PPF concentration in the serum from blood taken while alive, before therapy, was the highest ever reported in the literature. Despite the intensive therapy after the patients' admission, the PPF concentrations in the lungs, spleen, femoral blood and cardiac blood were fatal or abnormally high. On the other hand, the concentrations in the liver and skeletal muscle were lower or approximately the same as observed in cases with therapeutic doses. To the best of our knowledge, the distribution of PPF has not been investigated in fatal intoxication cases and can be helpful in clinical or forensic toxicology.


Subject(s)
Propafenone , Humans , Tissue Distribution , Propafenone/poisoning , Male , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/poisoning , Fatal Outcome , Adult
5.
Georgian Med News ; (347): 34-37, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38609110

ABSTRACT

Onco-pharmacogenesis or pharmaco-oncogenesis of skin cancer is a concept , which could also be considered as an "end product" of drug-mediated Nitrosogenesis or of the permissive regime for carcinogens to be (un)controlled released in drugs. Their controlled distribution remains until 2025 as a forced and non-alternative and there is no indication of any possibility to introduce a full elimination regime against the already mentioned carcinogenic availability. There are three main worrying facts that determine the need for these elimination regimes: 1) the clinicopathological correlations concerning the intake of a heterogeneous class of drugs and the subsequent development of relatively homogeneous tumours/ such as melanoma, 2) the recently proven mutagenic/ carcinogenic action of certain nitrosamines, but this time directly on human DNA, and 3) the fact that some of the nitrosamines are potent photocarcinogens that exert their genotoxic effects only after irradiation with UVA/ also recently proven/. In addition to the rhetoric mentioned above, there is also an overlap in mutational patterns between the genes previously generally accepted to affect melanomas - p53 / RAS oncogenes , with those identified as target genes, but being affected "mutationally", by certain nitrosamines. The processes of photocarcinogenesis, nitrosogenesis and oncopharmacogenesis of skin cancer are inextricably linked and should not be considered and analysed unilaterally or in a semi-invasive manner. Cataloguing the type of nitrosamines and their precise concentration on drug leaflets and prescription/official websites with permanent access to clinicians and end-users remains the only safe and effective weapon in the fight against (un)controlled contamination. The pharmaceutical industry and regulators remain the creators, the 'parents' of onco-pharmacogenesis, nitrosogenesis, and therefore the processes involved in the generation and progression of skin cancer. The impossibility of establishing elimination regimes for certain mutagens and/or carcinogens already proven to be present in medicines remains a mystery. In practice, end consumers find themselves in a state of enforced tolerance of certain genotoxic substances that are not even declared as available. Clinicians in the face of dermatologists/ dermatological surgeons remain the analysers and identifiers of these globalization processes. Once again, we present a patient who took the antiarrhythmic (nitroso-) drug propafenone and developed a relatively short-term nodular melanoma with a subsequent fatal outcome. We comment on the role of drug-mediated nitrosogenesis and its relationship to photocarcinogenesis and onco-pharmacogenesis.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Nitrosamines , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/etiology , Propafenone , Carcinogenesis/chemically induced , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic , Skin Neoplasms/chemically induced , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Carcinogens
6.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 34(12): 2545-2551, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37846208

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The use of flecainide and propafenone for medical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter/intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) is well-described in adults without congenital heart disease (CHD). Data are sparse regarding their use for the same purpose in adults with CHD and in adolescent patients with anatomically normal hearts and we sought to describe the use of class IC drugs in this population and identify factors associated with decreased likelihood of success. METHODS: Single center retrospective cohort study of patients who received oral flecainide or propafenone for medical cardioversion of AF or IART from 2000 to 2022. The unit of analysis was each episode of AF/IART. We performed a time-to-sinus rhythm analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model clustering on the patient to identify factors associated with increased likelihood of success. RESULTS: We identified 45 episodes involving 41 patients. As only episodes of AF were successfully cardioverted with medical therapy, episodes of IART were excluded from our analyses. Use of flecainide was the only factor associated with increased likelihood of success. There was a statistically insignificant trend toward decreased likelihood of success in patients with CHD. CONCLUSIONS: Flecainide was more effective than propafenone. We did not detect a difference in rate of conversion to sinus rhythm between patients with and without CHD and were likely underpowered to do so, however, there was a trend toward decreased likelihood of success in patients with CHD. That said, medical therapy was effective in >50% of patients with CHD with AF.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Atrial Flutter , Heart Defects, Congenital , Tachycardia, Supraventricular , Adult , Adolescent , Humans , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/adverse effects , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/chemically induced , Flecainide/adverse effects , Propafenone/adverse effects , Electric Countershock/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Tachycardia, Supraventricular/chemically induced , Atrial Flutter/diagnosis , Atrial Flutter/drug therapy , Tachycardia , Heart Defects, Congenital/complications , Heart Defects, Congenital/diagnosis , Heart Defects, Congenital/therapy
7.
Europace ; 25(5)2023 05 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37000581

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Limited data compared antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) with concomitant non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients, hence the aim of the study. METHODS AND RESULTS: National health insurance database were retrieved during 2012-17 for study. We excluded patients not taking AADs, bradycardia, heart block, heart failure admission, mitral stenosis, prosthetic valve, incomplete demographic data, and follow-up <3 months. Outcomes were compared in Protocol 1, dronedarone vs. non-dronedarone; Protocol 2, dronedarone vs. amiodarone; and Protocol 3, dronedarone vs. propafenone. Outcomes were acute myocardial infarction (AMI), ischaemic stroke/systemic embolism, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), major bleeding, cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) (including AMI, ischaemic stroke, and cardiovascular death). In Protocol 1, 2298 dronedarone users and 6984 non-dronedarone users (amiodarone = 4844; propafenone = 1914; flecainide = 75; sotalol = 61) were analysed. Dronedarone was associated with lower ICH (HR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.38-0.99, P = 0.0436), cardiovascular death (HR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.16-0.37, P < 0.0001), all-cause mortality (HR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.27-0.42, P < 0.0001), and MACE (HR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.45-0.70, P < 0.0001). In Protocol 2, 2231 dronedarone users and 6693 amiodarone users were analysed. Dronedarone was associated with significantly lower ICH (HR = 0.53, 95%=CI 0.33-0.84, P = 0.0078), cardiovascular death (HR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.13-0.31, P < 0.0001), all-cause mortality (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.22-0.34, P < 0.0001), and MACE (HR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.43-0.66, P < 0.0001), compared with amiodarone. In Protocol 3, 812 dronedarone users and 2436 propafenone users were analysed. There were no differences between two drugs for primary and secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: The use of dronedarone with NOACs was associated with cardiovascular benefits in an Asian population, compared with non-dronedarone AADs and amiodarone.


Subject(s)
Amiodarone , Atrial Fibrillation , Brain Ischemia , Ischemic Stroke , Stroke , Humans , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/adverse effects , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Propafenone/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/prevention & control , Amiodarone/adverse effects , Dronedarone/adverse effects
8.
Biol Pharm Bull ; 46(1): 133-137, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36596522

ABSTRACT

The negative inotropic effects of nine Vaughan Williams class I antiarrhythmic drugs were examined in guinea pig ventricular tissue preparations. The drugs decreased the contractile force of papillary muscles with different potencies: the potency order was propafenone > aprindine > cibenzoline > flecainide > ranolazine > disopyramide > pilsicainide > mexiletine > GS-458967. The potency of drugs correlated with the reported IC50 values to block the L-type Ca2+ channel rather than the Na+ channel. The effects of drugs were roughly the same when examined under a high extracellular K+ solution, which inactivates the Na+ channel. Furthermore, the attenuation of the extracellular Ca2+-induced positive inotropy was strong with propafenone, moderate with cibenzoline, and weak with pilsicainide. These results indicate that the negative inotropic effects of class I antiarrhythmic drugs can be largely explained by their blockade of the L-type Ca2+ channel.


Subject(s)
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents , Propafenone , Guinea Pigs , Animals , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/pharmacology , Propafenone/pharmacology , Myocardium , Lidocaine/pharmacology , Papillary Muscles
9.
Kardiologiia ; 63(6): 21-27, 2023 Jun 30.
Article in Russian, English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37470730

ABSTRACT

Aim      Evaluating the efficacy and safety of early administration of antirecurrence antiarrhythmic therapy (AAT) following restoration of sinus rhythm (SR) with refralon.Aim      Evaluating the efficacy and safety of early administration of antirecurrence antiarrhythmic therapy (AAT) following restoration of sinus rhythm (SR) with refralon.Material and methods  The study included 247 patients with atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL) (142 men) who underwent pharmacological cardioversion (PCV) with refralon. A 4-step schedule of drug administration was used (successive intravenous infusions at doses of 5, 5, 10, and 10 µg/kg; maximum total dose was 30 µg/kg). Patients who recovered SR and had no contraindications were prescribed antirecurrence AAT in the early (≤24 h; n=101) or delayed (≥24 h; n=95) period. Lappaconitine hydrobromide, propafenone, and sotalol were administered orally as the antirecurrence therapy. The decision on the time of initiating ATT and the choice of the drug and its dose was taken by the attending physician individually. The safety criteria included a prolonged PQ interval >200 ms; second- or third-degree atrioventricular block; QRS complex duration >120 ms; QT prolongation >500 ms; and heartbeat pauses >3 s. The efficacy criteria included the absence of sustained recurrence of AF/AFL after initiation of AAT and the duration of hospitalization after PCV. Patients were followed up during the study until they were discharged from the hospital.Results SR was recovered in 229 (92.7 %) patients. In the group of early AAT initiation, a PQ duration >200 ms was observed in 8 (7.9 %) patients, whereas in the group of delayed AAT initiation, in 7 patients (7.4 %; p=1.000). A wide QRS complex >120 ms was recorded in 1 (1.1 %) patient of the delayed AAT initiation group and in none of the patients of the early AAT initiation group (p=0.485). Ventricular arrhythmogenic effects and QT prolongation >500 ms were not detected in any patient. Numbers of early AF recurrence did not differ in the groups of early and delayed AAT initiation: 6 (5.9 %) vs. 5 (5.3 %), respectively (p=1.000). Median duration of hospitalization after PCV was 4 days in the group of early AAT initiation and 5 days in the group of delayed AAT initiation (р=0.009).Conclusion      Early initiation of the refralon AAT does not increase the risk of drug adverse effects and reduces the duration of stay in the hospital.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Atrial Flutter , Long QT Syndrome , Male , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Electric Countershock/adverse effects , Electric Countershock/methods , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Propafenone/therapeutic use , Atrial Flutter/diagnosis , Atrial Flutter/drug therapy , Long QT Syndrome/chemically induced , Long QT Syndrome/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
10.
Georgian Med News ; (342): 152-155, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37991972

ABSTRACT

The data on the polycontamination of multimedication in polymorbid patients with a heterogeneous class of carcinogens/nitrosamines, NDSRIs (classified according to the FDA regulation to the companies of 2023 to those with a carcinogenic potency between 1 and 5), are one of the most important steps to clarify the concept of skin cancer nitrosogenesis/ pathogenesis. The FDA is the first regulatory institution in the world to courageously declare that a problem exists and should be addressed. The main and currently unexplained and somewhat controversial issue lies in 1) the sporadic nature of polycontamination in different geographical regions, and 2) the lack of official data from the established international, but also regional pharmaceutical market regulators on the results of the checks conducted for nitrosamine contamination of the respective batches. It is this that leads scientists to the idea of (albeit seemingly) speculative but entirely possible controlled contamination of the production in certain geographical regions. This (hypo)thesis is supported, albeit indirectly, by the fact that: a recent regional check for possible contamination of sartans in a particular geographical region was not indicative of the presence of any nitrosamines/NDSRIs. But this fact is indicative of several extremely important things: 1) contamination is not ubiquitous, its genesis is heterogeneous; 2) contamination could be completely avoided at production level in certain geographical regions; 3) ˝controlled contamination˝ or carelessness of a heterogeneous nature should be excluded by the relevant regulators. Regular inspection and certification of medicinal products in relevant geographical regions to exclude contamination with nitrosamines/NDSRIs would be the surest method to protect public health globally. The initial parameters of the restrictive processes for the availability of nitrosamines in medicines have been established by the most powerful regulator globally in the face of the FDA, with the hope being that manufacturers will find a short-term solution to the problem. We report another patient who simultaneously developed 2 cutaneous tumors under potentially/actually nitrosamine contaminated drugs such as: beta blockers- atenolol, calcium antagonists- nifedipine/amlodipine, sartans- valsartan and antiarrhythmics- propafenone. One of the tumors was localized in the upper lip area (keratoacanthoma) and the other in the right shoulder area (basal cell carcinoma). Successful surgical treatment of the tumors was performed in the form of upper lip advancement rotation flap and elliptical excision of the second lesion. The evolution/growth rate of the tumors in relation to the potential mutagens/carcinogens heterogeneous in their potency contained in the drugs is commented.


Subject(s)
Keratoacanthoma , Neoplasms , Nitrosamines , Humans , Valsartan , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers , Propafenone , Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Nifedipine/therapeutic use , Amlodipine , Shoulder , Carcinogens , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Surgical Flaps
11.
Chem Res Toxicol ; 35(5): 829-839, 2022 05 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35442037

ABSTRACT

Propafenone (PPF) is a class IC antidysrhythmic drug, which is commonly used for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and other supraventricular arrhythmias. It is also a ß-adrenoceptor antagonist that can cause bradycardia and bronchospasm. Hepatotoxicity is one of the adverse reactions reported, with clinical manifestations including acute cholestasis and hepatocyte necrosis. However, the mechanism of PPF-induced hepatotoxicity remains unclear. The present study was conducted to identify reactive metabolite(s) to determine related metabolic pathways and define the possible association of the bioactivation with PPF cytotoxicity. An O-demethylation phase I metabolite (M1), a further position C5 hydroxylation (para-position of the benzene ring) metabolite (M2), glutathione (GSH) conjugates (M3 and M4), and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) conjugates (M5 and M6) were detected in rat liver microsomal incubations containing PPF and GSH or NAC as trapping agents. The corresponding GSH conjugates and NAC conjugates were found in the bile and urine of rats after PPF administration, respectively. The observed GSH and NAC conjugates indicate that a quinone metabolite was generated in vitro and in vivo. Recombinant P450 enzyme incubations showed that CYP2D6 was the principal enzyme catalyzing this metabolic activation. Quinidine, a selective inhibitor of CYP2D6, attenuated the susceptibility of hepatocytes to the cytotoxicity of PPF. The results suggest that PPF was metabolized to a p-quinone intermediate which may be involved in PPF-induced hepatotoxicity.


Subject(s)
Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6 , Acetylcysteine/metabolism , Activation, Metabolic , Animals , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury/metabolism , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6/metabolism , Glutathione/metabolism , Microsomes, Liver/metabolism , Propafenone/metabolism , Propafenone/pharmacology , Quinones/metabolism , Rats
12.
Am J Ther ; 29(1): e18-e25, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34994347

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Advances in drug therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) have had a significant impact on the quality of life of a substantial majority of affected persons, which has contributed to a remarkable decrease in the frequency and severity of thromboembolic complications, hospitalizations, and mortality. STUDY QUESTION: What are the milestones of the changes in the expert approach to the pharmacological management of AF in the past century? STUDY DESIGN: To determine the changes in the experts' approach to the management of AF, as presented in a widely used textbook in the United States. DATA SOURCES: The chapters presenting the management of AF in the 26 editions of Cecil Textbook of Medicine published from 1927 through 2020. RESULTS: AF was consistently described in Cecil Textbook of Medicine as the most common sustained arrhythmia in adults. The authors emphasized its thromboembolic complications and potential for hemodynamic deterioration. Rate control with digitalis and rhythm control with quinidine were the standard in 1927. The pharmacological advances have focused on atrioventricular nodal blocking for rate control, conversion to and maintenance of sinus rhythm, and preventive anticoagulation. The first new class of drugs for rate control was beta-adrenergic receptor blockers, starting with propranolol which was introduced in 1979, followed by the calcium channel blocker verapamil in 1988. Rhythm control with amiodarone, a potassium channel blocker, has been recommended since 2004, and the sodium channel blockers propafenone and flecainide became part of standard therapy in 2008. Anticoagulation with warfarin was recommended starting in 2000, followed by the introduction of direct thrombin inhibitor in 2012 and factor Xa inhibitors in 2016. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacological management of AF was unchanged for more than 50 years (1927-1979), a period during which the devastating effects of thromboembolic complications were not addressed. The major therapeutic advance is represented by preventive anticoagulation with the newer, safer, and more user-friendly direct thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors.


Subject(s)
Amiodarone , Atrial Fibrillation , Adult , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Expert Testimony , Humans , Propafenone , Quality of Life
13.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 78(6): 1039-1045, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35190869

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The objective of the present systematic review was to compare the effectiveness and safety of class Ic agents for cardioversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), in patients with and without structural heart disease (SHD). METHODS: We focused on RCTs enrolling at least 50 adult patients with electrocardiogram-documented paroxysmal AF that compared either two pharmacological class Ic cardioversion agents (flecainide, propafenone), regardless of study design (parallel or crossover). We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Initial search was performed from inception to 15 July 2021 with no language restrictions. RESULTS: Intravenous flecainide is the most effective option for pharmacologic cardioversion of AF since only 2 patients need to be treated in order to cardiovert one more within 4 h. Most importantly, class Ic agents appear to be safe in the context of pharmacologic cardioversion of AF irrespective of the presence of SHD, pointing towards a possible reappraisal of the role in this setting. CONCLUSION: We suggest that class Ic agents (with flecainide appearing to be more effective) should be used for pharmacologic cardioversion in stable AF patients presenting in emergency department with unknown medical history, after excluding severe cardiac disease through a bedside examination. REGISTRATION NUMBER (DOI): Available in https://osf.io/apwt7/ , https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/APWT7.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/adverse effects , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Electric Countershock , Flecainide/therapeutic use , Humans , Propafenone/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
14.
J Biochem Mol Toxicol ; 36(8): e23085, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35499814

ABSTRACT

Propafenone is a well-known Class 1C antiarrhythmic agent that has sodium channel blocking properties as well as the ability to block 13 other channels and a modest calcium antagonistic effect. Propafenone has a profound electrophysiologic effect on auxiliary atrioventricular circuits and in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia can obstruct conduction in the fast conducting pathway. Furthermore, propafenone is less likely than other Class 1C drugs to cause proarrhythmia. However, although this medicine can pass through the placenta, the effects during pregnancy remain unknown. Here, we investigated the potential teratogenic and genotoxic effects of Rythmol during rat development. Pregnant Wistar rats received 46.25 mg/kg body weight of propafenone daily by gavage from Gestation Day (GD) 5 to GD 19. At GD 20, the dams were dissected, and their fetuses were assessed via morphologic, skeletal, and histologic investigation. In addition, a comet assay was used to measure DNA impairment of fetal skull osteocytes and hepatic cells. The study showed that propafenone treatment of pregnant rats led to a marked decrease in gravid uterine weight, number of implants/litter, number of viable fetuses, and bodyweight of fetuses but a clear increase in placental weight and placental index in the treated group. Frequent morphologic abnormalities and severe ossification deficiency in the cranium bones were observed in the treatment group. Various histopathological changes were observed in the liver, kidney, and brain tissues of maternally treated fetuses. Similarly, propafenone induced DNA damage to examined samples. Thus, our study indicates that propafenone may be embryotoxic in humans.


Subject(s)
Placenta , Propafenone , Animals , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Propafenone/pharmacology , Propafenone/therapeutic use , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Teratogens
15.
Pediatr Cardiol ; 43(6): 1311-1318, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35258638

ABSTRACT

Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is the most common arrhythmia in neonates and infants, and pharmacological therapy is recommended to prevent recurrent episodes. This retrospective study aims to describe and analyze the practice patterns, effectiveness, and outcome of drug therapy for SVT in patients within the first year of life. Among the 67 patients analyzed, 48 presented with atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia, 18 with focal atrial, and one with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant. Fetal tachycardia was reported in 27%. Antiarrhythmic treatment consisted of beta-receptor blocking agents in 42 patients, propafenone in 20, amiodarone in 20, and digoxin in 5. Arrhythmia control was achieved with single drug therapy in 70% of the patients, 21% needed dual therapy, and 6% triple. Propafenone was discontinued in 7 infants due to widening of the QRS complex. After 12 months (6-60), 75% of surviving patients were tachycardia-free and discontinued prophylactic treatment. Patients with fetal tachycardia had a significantly higher risk of persistent tachycardia (p: 0.007). Prophylactic antiarrhythmic medication for SVT in infancy is safe and well tolerated. Arrhythmia control is often achieved with single medication, and after cessation, most patients are free of arrhythmias. Infants with SVT and a history of fetal tachycardia are more prone to suffer from persistent SVT and relapses after cessation of prophylactic antiarrhythmic medication than infants with the first episode of SVT after birth.


Subject(s)
Propafenone , Tachycardia, Supraventricular , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/adverse effects , Digoxin/therapeutic use , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Propafenone/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Tachycardia, Supraventricular/drug therapy
16.
Cardiol Young ; 32(4): 623-627, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34321127

ABSTRACT

AIM: This retrospective case series study sought to describe the safety and clinical effectiveness of propafenone for the control of arrhythmias in children with and without CHD or cardiomyopathy. METHODS: We reviewed baseline characteristics and subsequent outcomes in a group of 63 children treated with propafenone at 2 sites over a 15-year period Therapy was considered effective if no clinically apparent breakthrough episodes of arrhythmias were noted on the medication. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (29 males) were initiated on propafenone at a median age of 2.3 years. CHD or cardiomyopathy was noted in 21/63 (33%). There were no significant differences between demographics, clinical backgrounds, antiarrhythmic details, side effect profiles, and outcomes between children with normal hearts and children with CHD or cardiomyopathy. Cardiac depression at the initiation of propafenone was more common amongst children with CHD or cardiomyopathy compared to children with normal hearts. Systemic ventricular function was diminished in 15/63 patients (24%) prior to starting propafenone and improved in 8/15 (53%) of patients once better rhythm control was achieved. Other than one child in whom medication was stopped due to gastroesophageal reflux, no other child experienced significant systemic or cardiac side effects during treatment with propafenone. Propafenone achieved nearly equal success in controlling arrhythmias in both children with normal hearts and children with congenital heart disease or cardiomyopathy (90% versus 86%, p = 0.88). CONCLUSION: Propafenone is a safe and effective antiarrhythmic medication in children.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac , Propafenone , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/adverse effects , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/prevention & control , Cardiomyopathies/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Coronary Disease/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Propafenone/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies
17.
Europace ; 23(8): 1200-1210, 2021 08 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33723602

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Single oral dose anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) are used to cardiovert recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF); however, the optimal agent is uncertain. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials testing single oral dose AADs vs. any comparator to cardiovert AF <7 days duration. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL to April 2020. The primary outcome was successful cardioversion at timepoint nearest 8 h after administration. RESULTS: From 12 712 citations, 22 trials (2320 patients) were included. Thirteen trials included patients with some degree of heart failure; 19 included patients with some degree of ischaemic heart disease vs. placebo or rate-control (32% success) at 8 h, flecainide [73%, network odds ratio (OR) 7.6, 95% credible interval (CrI) 4.4-14.0], propafenone (70%, OR 4.6, CrI 2.9-7.3), and pilsicainide (59%, OR 10.0, CrI 1.8-69.0), but not amiodarone (28%, OR 1.0, CrI 0.4-2.8) were superior. Flecainide (OR 7.5, CrI 2.6-24.0) and propafenone (OR 4.5, CrI 1.6-13.0) were superior to amiodarone; propafenone vs. flecainide did not statistically differ (OR 0.6, CrI 0.3-1.1). At longest follow-up, amiodarone was superior to placebo (OR 11.0, CrI 3.2-41.0), flecainide vs. amiodarone (OR 0.79, CrI 0.19-3.1), and propafenone vs. amiodarone (OR 0.36, CrI 0.092-1.4) were not statistically different, and flecainide was superior to propafenone (OR 2.2, CrI 1.1-4.8). Atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias, bradyarrhythmias, and hypotension were rare with PO AADs. CONCLUSION: Single oral dose Class 1C AADs are effective and safe for cardioversion of recent-onset AF. Flecainide may be superior to propafenone. Amiodarone is a slower acting alternative.


Subject(s)
Amiodarone , Atrial Fibrillation , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/adverse effects , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Electric Countershock , Humans , Network Meta-Analysis , Propafenone/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
18.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(3)2021 Jan 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33514068

ABSTRACT

Electrical remodelling as a result of homeodomain transcription factor 2 (Pitx2)-dependent gene regulation was linked to atrial fibrillation (AF) and AF patients with single nucleotide polymorphisms at chromosome 4q25 responded favorably to class I antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). The possible reasons behind this remain elusive. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of the AADs disopyramide, quinidine, and propafenone on human atrial arrhythmias mediated by Pitx2-induced remodelling, from a single cell to the tissue level, using drug binding models with multi-channel pharmacology. Experimentally calibrated populations of human atrial action po-tential (AP) models in both sinus rhythm (SR) and Pitx2-induced AF conditions were constructed by using two distinct models to represent morphological subtypes of AP. Multi-channel pharmaco-logical effects of disopyramide, quinidine, and propafenone on ionic currents were considered. Simulated results showed that Pitx2-induced remodelling increased maximum upstroke velocity (dVdtmax), and decreased AP duration (APD), conduction velocity (CV), and wavelength (WL). At the concentrations tested in this study, these AADs decreased dVdtmax and CV and prolonged APD in the setting of Pitx2-induced AF. Our findings of alterations in WL indicated that disopyramide may be more effective against Pitx2-induced AF than propafenone and quinidine by prolonging WL.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Animals , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/chemistry , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/pharmacology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/genetics , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/pathology , Atrial Fibrillation/genetics , Atrial Fibrillation/pathology , Computer Simulation , Disopyramide/chemistry , Disopyramide/pharmacology , Heart Atria/drug effects , Heart Atria/pathology , Humans , Mice , Propafenone/chemistry , Propafenone/therapeutic use , Quinidine/chemistry , Quinidine/pharmacology , Homeobox Protein PITX2
19.
Georgian Med News ; (315): 85-93, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34365431

ABSTRACT

Combined therapy using several antiarrhythmic agents can be useful for treatment of different disorders of cardiac rhythm, including their hazardous and stable forms. It is especially required in case of insufficient efficacy after using one antiarrhythmic agent. As a combined therapy one can use the administration of several preparations e.g. 1) preparations of IA subclass and ß-blocker adrenergic agents; 2) antiarrhythmic agents of I class and calcium channel blocker agents (verapamil and dilthiazem); 3) III class (amiodarone or sotalol) together with ß-blocker drugs; 4) antiarrhythmic agents of III class and calcium antagonists; 5) antiarrhythmic agents of I and III classes. The latter combination has especially strong effect for treatment of arrhythmias caused by re-entry mechanism with or without a short excitability period. Antiarrhythmic agents of II class (ß-blocker drugs) and III classes (amiodarone or sotalol) cause reduction of development risk of arrhythmias with trigger mechanism, including bidirectional spindle-shaped ventricular (torsade de pointes) tachycardia. Thus, combinations including preparations of II class together with III class and simultaneous using of antiarrhythmic agents of I and III classes should be administered to prevent hazardous potentially lethal arrhythmias. The authors of this article have developed a new method of combined therapy of paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with ischemic heart disease, including the use of allapinin and cardiac glycosides. The author's certificate of invention was obtained for this method. The efficacy of this combined therapy for suppression of supraventricular paroxysmal tachyarrhythmias was analyzed compared to treatment with allapinin alone. It was proved that combined therapy has bigger effectiveness in comparison with therapy with help allapinin only. It is forbidden to use of such combinations of antiarrhythmic agents: ß-adrenergic blocker agent + verapamil; ß-adrenergic blocker agent + dilthizem; propafenone + verapamil; propafenone + dilthizem; propafenone + ß-adrenergic blocker agent. After administration of such combined therapy, it is possible the occurrence medicinal (toxic) disfunction of sinus node. The administration of propafenone together with ß-adrenergic blocker agent is impossible because propafenone has properties of ß-blocker preparation. It is connected with similar chemical structure of propafenone and non-selective ß-blocker agent propranolol.


Subject(s)
Amiodarone , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/drug therapy , Humans , Propafenone , Sotalol/therapeutic use
20.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 43(7): 680-686, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32459027

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the incidence, type, and management of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVT) during the first year of life in a retrospective, population-based, single-center study during a 10-year period. METHODS: The analyzed patient cohort is based on data from the only specialized center managing all cases of neonatal and infant SVTs between 2009 and 2018 in the Slovak Republic (5.5 million population). A total of 116 consecutive patients <366 days old were included in the study. RESULTS: Calculated SVT incidence ratio was 1:4500 in the first year of life. AV reentry tachycardia was the leading arrhythmia (49%). SVT in this specific population was frequently a transient problem with spontaneous resolution in 87% of patients during a median 3-year follow up. Congenital heart disease was common (16%). Intrauterine treatment by drugs administered to mother was safe and effective in preventing unnecessary cesarean deliveries. In arrhythmia termination, amiodarone and propafenone were equally safe and effective, with possible more favorable pharmacodynamics of the former. For prophylactic treatment, sotalol and propafenone were equally safe and effective and became the preferred basis of long-term drug therapy in our center. However, this therapy requires intensive monitoring during its initiation. CONCLUSION: The prognosis of SVT in the first year of life is good: with optimized pharmacological treatment, the need for early catheter ablation and mortality rate are low (<1%) and there is a high rate of spontaneous arrhythmia resolution. Heart failure is a possible predictor of arrhythmia persistence with need for ablation in later life.


Subject(s)
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Tachycardia, Supraventricular/drug therapy , Tachycardia, Supraventricular/epidemiology , Amiodarone/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pregnancy , Propafenone/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Slovakia/epidemiology , Sotalol/therapeutic use , Tachycardia, Supraventricular/congenital
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL