Rheumatology: What You May Have Missed in 2023.

Many patients with rheumatologic conditions receive care from physicians other than rheumatologists. Here we note key findings from 6 studies in rheumatology published in 2023 that offer valuable insights for internal medicine specialists and subspecialists outside of rheumatology. The first study investigated the effect of low-dose glucocorticoids on patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over 2 years and challenged existing perceptions about the risks of glucocorticoids in this setting. The second study focused on the updated guideline for preventing and treating glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. With the chronic and widespread use of glucocorticoids, the American College of Rheumatology emphasized the importance of assessing fracture risk and initiating pharmacologic therapy when appropriate. The third study explored the potential use of methotrexate in treating inflammatory hand osteoarthritis, suggesting a novel approach to managing this challenging and common condition. The results of the fourth article we highlight suggest that sarilumab has promise as an adjunct treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica relapse during glucocorticoid dosage tapering. The fifth study evaluated sublingual cyclobenzaprine for fibromyalgia treatment, noting both potential benefits and risks. Finally, the sixth article is a systematic review and meta-analysis that assessed the therapeutic equivalence of biosimilars and reference biologics in the treatment of patients with RA. Knowledge of this recent literature will be useful to clinicians regardless of specialty who care for patients with these commonly encountered conditions.

Axial spondyloarthritis guidelines - aiming for maximum impact.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review discusses international clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) focusing on methodology, guideline quality, and implementation. RECENT FINDINGS: The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ASAS/EULAR) and Pan-American League of Associations for Rheumatology (PANLAR) recently published axSpA CPGs and updates of the American College of Rheumatology/Spondylitis Association of America/Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network (ACR/SAA/SPARTAN) and Asia-Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology (APLAR) CPGs are expected. GRADE has emerged as the dominant framework for CPG development and has been used by three of the four international axSpA guidelines. Notable differences exist among these guidelines in the way that the recommendations are presented. Two of the four acknowledge the need for implementation strategies, but little detail about this is provided. The few studies that have evaluated the implementation of axSpA CPGs have identified poor adherence to recommendations on physical therapy/exercise and disease activity monitoring. Implementation science has identified many barriers and facilitators affecting guideline uptake, including those related to healthcare professionals and to the guidelines themselves. Creation of a tailored implementation plan simultaneously with the CPG is recommended. SUMMARY: While methodological rigor in the creation of evidence-based recommendations is the focus of CPG development, recommendations must be presented in a user-friendly format that makes them easy to apply. 'Living guidelines' could facilitate keeping content up to date. Implementation is critical for the success of a CPG and should be emphasized in future axSpA guideline updates. Further research is needed to better understand the factors impacting the successful implementation of axSpA CPGs.

Large language models and the future of rheumatology: assessing impact and emerging opportunities.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Large language models (LLMs) have grown rapidly in size and capabilities as more training data and compute power has become available. Since the release of ChatGPT in late 2022, there has been growing interest and exploration around potential applications of LLM technology. Numerous examples and pilot studies demonstrating the capabilities of these tools have emerged across several domains. For rheumatology professionals and patients, LLMs have the potential to transform current practices in medicine. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have begun exploring capabilities of LLMs that can assist rheumatologists in clinical practice, research, and medical education, though applications are still emerging. In clinical settings, LLMs have shown promise in assist healthcare professionals enabling more personalized medicine or generating routine documentation like notes and letters. Challenges remain around integrating LLMs into clinical workflows, accuracy of the LLMs and ensuring patient data confidentiality. In research, early experiments demonstrate LLMs can offer analysis of datasets, with quality control as a critical piece. Lastly, LLMs could supplement medical education by providing personalized learning experiences and integration into established curriculums. SUMMARY: As these powerful tools continue evolving at a rapid pace, rheumatology professionals should stay informed on how they may impact the field.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in rheumatology: B-cell depletion 2.0.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) has revolutionized cancer treatment by harnessing the immune system's power to target malignancies. CD19, a B-cell surface antigen, a key target for CAR-T cell therapy in hematological malignancies, displayed remarkable clinical responses. Recently, there has been a growing interest in exploring the application of CD19 CAR-T cell therapy beyond oncology. The rationale for investigating CD19 CAR-T cells in Rheumatology stems from their ability to selectively target B cells, which play a central pathogenic role through autoantibody-dependent and independent mechanisms. RECENT FINDINGS: Preclinical and five completed clinical studies have shown remarkable efficacy and safety in diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus, antisynthetase syndrome, and systemic sclerosis. It is thus not surprising that 17 active clinical trials exploring CAR-T cells in Rheumatology are in progress. SUMMARY: Although CAR-T therapy holds great promise in Rheumatology, many challenges loom. Whether this new way to deplete B-cells is superior to conventional antibody-based B-cell depletion in rheumatic diseases will be closely watched in the coming years.

Chimeric antigen receptors: "CARs" in the fast lane for rheumatology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent advances in hematology-oncology have pioneered cell-mediated elimination of pathologic B-cell populations employing chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. In this review, we discuss recent adoption of CAR-T treatment for severe refractory autoimmune disease. We highlight unique aspects of the autoimmune model and review current clinical data regarding treatment of rheumatologic disease. RECENT FINDINGS: To date, several CAR-Ts are FDA approved for Multiple Myeloma and B-cell malignancies and have demonstrated extraordinary clinical responses in refractory disease. Realizing the central role of B-cells in certain autoimmune diseases, CAR-T is now being explored for achieving drug-free remission induction, and potentially cure, of several rheumatologic diseases. The largest experience to date in the field of autoimmunity, building off the University Hospital Erlangen groups' earlier success treating a single patient with CD19-CAR in severe refractory SLE, Mackensen et al. enrolled five patients in a compassionate use program. Following autologous CD19-CAR T infusion, they demonstrated drug-free clinical and laboratory remission for at least 12 months in all five patients, with reconstitution of B cells expressing a naïve phenotype. SUMMARY: CAR-T treatment has shown striking drug-free responses in severe lupus and other autoimmune diseases, creating a need for further exploration and development.

Renal disease in pediatric rheumatology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review will provide updates in the outcomes in the common rheumatologic diseases with kidney involvement. Covered are also advances in therapeutics for the use of pediatric rheumatologic diseases with kidney involvement, as well as the potential kidney complications from other rheumatologic diseases and their medications. RECENT FINDINGS: Two of the more common rheumatologic diseases with kidney involvement, lupus and vasculitis, continue to show inadequate response to initial therapy of renal disease and practice continues to be driven by results of adult studies. SUMMARY: There is a continued need for pediatric specific studies in rheumatologic diseases with kidney involvement as outcomes continue to be inadequate. Despite recently approved treatments for adults with rheumatic diseases and kidney involvement, therapeutic options in pediatrics remain limited, contributing to the overall morbidity and mortality.

Long-term safety of biologic and targeted synthetic disease modifying drugs in rheumatology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The landscape for treatment of rheumatic diseases is ever evolving, with several new drugs recently approved across diseases and more in the pipeline. This timely review aims to highlight the latest literature on long-term safety profiles of salient established and emerging biologic (b) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). RECENT FINDINGS: The risk of infection remains elevated with the use of most b and tsDMARDs, with specifically risk of hepatitis B reactivation with rituximab and zoster infection with JAK inhibitors (JAKi). The results of the ORAL surveillance trial led to new black box warnings for JAKi and evoked critical risk-benefit discussions surrounding JAKi and DMARDs overall. SUMMARY: Such well conducted trials are needed to gather long term comparative safety data of DMARDs. In the interim, real world observational studies also have a role to play in our understanding of long-term drug safety, provided that detailed attention is paid to minimize biases inherent in observational studies.

Rheumatoid arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic, systemic, autoimmune inflammatory disease that mainly affects the joints and periarticular soft tissues. In this Seminar, we provide an overview of the main aspects of rheumatoid arthritis. Epidemiology and advances in the understanding of rheumatoid arthritis pathogenesis will be reviewed. We will discuss the clinical manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis, classification criteria, and the value of imaging in the diagnosis of the disease. The advent of new medications and the accumulated scientific evidence demand continuous updating regarding the diagnosis and management, including therapy, of rheumatoid arthritis. An increasing number of patients are now able to reach disease remission. This major improvement in the outcome of patients with rheumatoid arthritis has been determined by a combination of different factors (eg, early diagnosis, window of opportunity, treat-to-target strategy, advent of targeted disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and combination therapy). We will discuss the updated recommendations of the two most influential societies for rheumatology worldwide (ie, the American College of Rheumatology and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology) for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Furthermore, controversies (ie, the role of glucocorticoids in the management of rheumatoid arthritis and safety profile of Janus kinase inhibitors) and outstanding research questions, including precision medicine approach, prevention, and cure of rheumatoid arthritis will be highlighted.

Determination of the most appropriate ACR response definition for contemporary drug approval trials in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate which American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response definition (ACR20, 50 or 70) should primarily be used for efficacy claims in future drug approval trials of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We systematically searched EMBASE, Medline and the Cochrane Library for randomised controlled RA drug approval trials of biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). We included full-text articles reporting ACR response rates for multiple time points over a 24-week placebo-controlled period and visualised normalised response trajectories over time in different patient populations. Using mixed-effect logistic regression, we calculated the proportion of ACR responders per outcome and time point, and compared the discriminant validity of these metrics at multiple time points. RESULTS: We screened 12 680 records and included 45 in the final analysis. Discriminative capacity of the ACR20 was high across all time points, whereas ACR50 and ACR70 showed highest discrimination towards the end of the placebo-controlled periods. This effect could be observed in all patient populations and compound groups. Faster response to treatment was observed in DMARD naïve patient populations when compared with DMARD insufficient responders. CONCLUSION: ACR20 remains the most powerful discriminator between active treatment and placebo, especially when early discrimination is of primary interest. At the same time, our results support the selection of more stringent thresholds if later time points shall be evaluated, given their comparable discriminant but higher clinical face validity.

Unmet need in rheumatology: reports from the Advances in Targeted Therapies meeting, 2023.

The Advances in Targeted Therapies meets annually, convening experts in the field of rheumatology to both provide scientific updates and identify existing scientific gaps within the field. To review the major unmet scientific needs in rheumatology. The 23rd annual Advances in Targeted Therapies meeting convened with more than 100 international basic scientists and clinical researchers in rheumatology, immunology, infectious diseases, epidemiology, molecular biology and other specialties relating to all aspects of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. We held breakout sessions in five rheumatological disease-specific groups including: rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), axial spondyloarthritis (axSpa), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis (SSc) and vasculitis, and osteoarthritis (OA). In each group, experts were asked to identify and prioritise current unmet needs in clinical and translational research. An overarching theme across all disease states is the continued need for clinical trial design innovation with regard to therapeutics, endpoint and disease endotypes. Within RA, unmet needs comprise molecular classification of disease pathogenesis and activity, pre-/early RA strategies, more refined pain profiling and innovative trials designs to deliver on precision medicine. Continued scientific questions within PsA include evaluating the genetic, immunophenotypic, clinical signatures that predict development of PsA in patients with psoriasis, and the evaluation of combination therapies for difficult-to-treat disease. For axSpA, there continues to be the need to understand the role of interleukin-23 (IL-23) in pathogenesis and the genetic relationship of the IL-23-receptor polymorphism with other related systemic inflammatory diseases (eg, inflammatory bowel disease). A major unmet need in the OA field remains the need to develop the ability to reliably phenotype and stratify patients for inclusion in clinical trials. SLE experts identified a number of unmet needs within clinical trial design including the need for allowing endpoints that reflect pharmacodynamic/functional outcomes (eg, inhibition of type I interferon pathway activation; changes in urine biomarkers). Lastly, within SSc and vasculitis, there is a lack of biomarkers that predict response or disease progression, and that allow patients to be stratified for therapies. There remains a strong need to innovate clinical trial design, to identify systemic and tissue-level biomarkers that predict progression or response to therapy, endotype disease, and to continue developing therapies and therapeutic strategies for those with treatment-refractory disease. This document, based on expert consensus, should provide a roadmap for prioritising scientific endeavour in the field of rheumatology.

Rheumatology and Long COVID: lessons from the study of fibromyalgia.

Rheumatology, such as other subspecialties, has both a unique perspective to offer as well as an evolving role to play in the global COVID-19 pandemic. Our field has already contributed meaningfully to the development and repurposing of many of the immune-based therapeutics which are now standard treatments for severe forms of the disease as well as to the understanding of the epidemiology, risk factors and natural history of COVID-19 in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Still in evolution is our potential to contribute to burgeoning research efforts in the next phase of the pandemic: the syndrome of postacute sequelae of COVID-19 or Long COVID. While our field brings many assets to the study of Long COVID including our expertise in the investigation of chronic inflammation and autoimmunity, our Viewpoint focuses on the strong similarities between fibromyalgia (FM) and Long COVID. While one can speculate on how embracing and confident practising rheumatologists already are regarding these interrelationships, we assert that in the emerging field of Long COVID the potential lessons from the field of fibromyalgia care and research have been underappreciated and marginalised and most importantly now deserve a critical appraisal.

Development and evaluation of a text analytics algorithm for automated application of national COVID-19 shielding criteria in rheumatology patients.

INTRODUCTION: At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the UK's Scientific Committee issued extreme social distancing measures, termed 'shielding', aimed at a subpopulation deemed extremely clinically vulnerable to infection. National guidance for risk stratification was based on patients' age, comorbidities and immunosuppressive therapies, including biologics that are not captured in primary care records. This process required considerable clinician time to manually review outpatient letters. Our aim was to develop and evaluate an automated shielding algorithm by text-mining outpatient letter diagnoses and medications, reducing the need for future manual review. METHODS: Rheumatology outpatient letters from a large UK foundation trust were retrieved. Free-text diagnoses were processed using Intelligent Medical Objects software (Concept Tagger), which used interface terminology for each condition mapped to Systematized Medical Nomenclature for Medicine-Clinical Terminology (SNOMED-CT) codes. We developed the Medication Concept Recognition tool (Named Entity Recognition) to retrieve medications' type, dose, duration and status (active/past) at the time of the letter. Age, diagnosis and medication variables were then combined to calculate a shielding score based on the most recent letter. The algorithm's performance was evaluated using clinical review as the gold standard. The time taken to deploy the developed algorithm on a larger patient subset was measured. RESULTS: In total, 5942 free-text diagnoses were extracted and mapped to SNOMED-CT, with 13 665 free-text medications (n=803 patients). The automated algorithm demonstrated a sensitivity of 80% (95% CI: 75%, 85%) and specificity of 92% (95% CI: 90%, 94%). Positive likelihood ratio was 10 (95% CI: 8, 14), negative likelihood ratio was 0.21 (95% CI: 0.16, 0.28) and F1 score was 0.81. Evaluation of mismatches revealed that the algorithm performed correctly against the gold standard in most cases. The developed algorithm was then deployed on records from an additional 15 865 patients, which took 18 hours for data extraction and 1 hour to deploy. DISCUSSION: An automated algorithm for risk stratification has several advantages including reducing clinician time for manual review to allow more time for direct care, improving efficiency and increasing transparency in individual patient communication. It has the potential to be adapted for future public health initiatives that require prompt automated review of hospital outpatient letters.

Lymphadenopathy in the rheumatology practice: a pragmatic approach.

Lymphadenopathy is a common clinical finding and diagnostic challenge within general medicine and rheumatology practice. It may represent a primary manifestation of an underlying immune-mediated disease or indicate an infectious or neoplastic complication requiring differing management. Evaluating lymphadenopathy is of particular relevance in rheumatology, given that lymph node enlargement is a common finding within the clinical spectrum of several well-known rheumatologic disorders including RA, SLE and SS. In addition, lymphadenopathy represents a hallmark manifestation of rare immunological diseases such as Castleman disease and IgG4-related disease that must be considered in the differential diagnosis because effective targeted treatments can now impact the prognosis of these conditions. In this review we present an overview of the clinical significance of lymphadenopathy in common and rare rheumatologic diseases and propose a practical approach to lymphadenopathy in the rheumatology practice. Differential diagnosis of Castleman disease and therapeutic options for this condition of increasing rheumatologic interest will be discussed in detail.

Impact of interstitial lung disease on clinical remission and unfavourable events of rheumatoid arthritis: results from the IORRA cohort.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the impact of concomitant interstitial lung disease (ILD) on achieving clinical remission and the occurrence of unfavourable clinical events in patients with RA. METHODS: Among the participants in the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) cohort from 2011 to 2012, patients not achieving remission of 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) at baseline and those with chest CT images were enrolled. Based on the chest CT images, the patients were divided into two groups: the ILD group and non-ILD group. The associations among the presence of ILD with time to achieving DAS28 remission and development of death, hospitalized infection, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), or malignancy within 5 years were evaluated using time-dependent Cox regression models. RESULTS: We enrolled 287 patients in the ILD group and 1235 in the non-ILD group. DAS28 remission was achieved at least once in 55.7% and 75.0% of the ILD and non-ILD groups within 5 years, respectively. Presence of ILD was significantly associated with failure to achieve DAS28 remission (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.58, 0.89). ILD was also a significant factor associated with death (aHR: 3.24; 95% CI: 2.08, 5.03), hospitalized infection (aHR 2.60; 95% CI: 1.77, 3.83), MACE (aHR: 3.40; 95% CI: 1.76, 6.58), and lung cancer (aHR: 16.0; 95% CI: 3.22, 79.2), but not with malignant lymphoma (aHR: 2.27; 95% CI: 0.59, 8.81). CONCLUSION: Concomitant ILD was a significant factor associated with failure to achieve clinical remission and the occurrence of the unfavourable clinical events in patients with RA.

Serum interleukin-18 levels can improve the diagnostic performance of the PRINTO and ILAR criteria for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Recently, the Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO) has proposed revisions to the current International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) criteria for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (s-JIA). Interleukin (IL)-18 overproduction plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of s-JIA. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the PRINTO criteria compared with the ILAR criteria and determine whether serum IL-18 levels improve their diagnostic performances. METHODS: Overall, 90 patients with s-JIA and 27 patients with other febrile disease controls presenting with a prolonged fever of > 14 days and arthritis and/or erythematous rash were enrolled. The ILAR and PRINTO classification criteria were applied to all patients and examined with expert diagnoses. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used for measuring serum IL-18 levels. RESULTS: The PRINTO criteria had higher sensitivity but lower specificity than the ILAR criteria (sensitivity: PRINTO 0.856, ILAR 0.533; specificity: PRINTO 0.259, ILAR 0.851). With the addition of serum IL-18 levels ≥ 4,800 pg/mL, the sensitivity of the ILAR criteria and specificity of the PRINTO criteria were improved to 1.000 and 1.000, respectively. PRINTO plus serum IL-18 levels ≥ 4,800 pg/mL showed the highest value in Youden's index (sensitivity - [1 - specificity]). CONCLUSION: Serum IL-18 levels could improve the diagnostic performance of the PRINTO and ILAR criteria for s-JIA. The PRINTO criteria plus serum IL-18 levels ≥ 4,800 pg/mL could be the best diagnostic performance for s-JIA.

The Emerging Specialty of Cardio-Rheumatology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we aimed to summarize the different aspects of the field of cardio-rheumatology, the role of the cardio-rheumatologist, and future research in the field. RECENT FINDINGS: Cardio-rheumatology is an emerging subspecialty within cardiology that focuses on addressing the intricate relationship between systemic inflammation and cardiovascular diseases. It involves understanding the cardiovascular impact of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases on the heart and vascular system. A cardio-rheumatologist's role is multifaceted. First, they should understand the cardiac manifestations of rheumatological diseases. They should also be knowledgeable about the different immunotherapies available and side effects. Additionally, they should know how to utilize imaging modalities, either for diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment monitoring. This field is constantly evolving with new research on both treatment and imaging of the effects of inflammation on the cardiovascular system.

Association of Serum Soluble Transferrin Receptor Concentration With Markers of Inflammation: Analysis of 1001 Patients From a Tertiary Rheumatology Center.

OBJECTIVE: Soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) is considered to be a useful biomarker for the diagnosis of iron deficiency, especially in the setting of inflammation, as it is thought to not be affected by inflammation. We analyzed the relationship between sTfR levels and inflammatory markers in patients with known or suspected inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD). METHODS: Blood samples of 1001 patients with known or suspected IRD referred to a tertiary rheumatology center were analyzed. Study participants were classified as patients with active IRD and patients with inactive IRD or without IRD. Correlation analyses were used to explore the relationship between sTfR levels and inflammatory markers (ie, C-reactive protein [CRP], erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]). We applied multiple linear regression analysis to evaluate the predictive value of CRP levels for sTfR concentrations after adjustment for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: There were positive correlations between inflammatory markers (CRP, ESR) and serum sTfR levels (ρ 0.44, ρ 0.43, respectively; P < 0.001), exceeding the strength of correlation between inflammatory markers and the acute phase reactant ferritin (ρ 0.30, ρ 0.23, respectively; P < 0.001). Patients with active IRD demonstrated higher serum sTfR levels compared to patients with inactive or without IRD (mean 3.99 [SD 1.69] mg/L vs 3.31 [SD 1.57] mg/L; P < 0.001). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, CRP levels are predictive for serum sTfR concentrations (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The study provides evidence against the concept that sTfR is a biomarker not affected by inflammation.

The State of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Rheumatology.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the quality and timeliness of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure reporting, which have not been previously studied. METHODS: Clinical trials that informed new US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals for the first rheumatological indication between 1995 and 2021 were identified. Data were recorded to determine whether collected PROs were published, met minimum clinically important difference (MCID) or statistical significance (P < 0.05) thresholds, and were consistent with Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)-PRO standards. Hazard ratios and Kaplan-Meier estimate were used to assess the time from FDA approval to PRO publication. RESULTS: Thirty-one FDA approvals corresponded with 110 pivotal trials and 262 reported PROs. Of the 90 included studies, 1 (1.1%) met all 5 recommended items, 10 (11.1%) met 4 items, 17 (18.9%) met 3 items, 21 (23.3%) met 2 items, 26 (28.9%) met 1 item, and 15 (16.7%) met none of the reporting standards. Most PROs met MCID thresholds (149/262; 56.9%) and were statistically significant (223/262; 85.1%). Of our subset analysis, one-third of PROs were not published upfront (70/212; 33%) and 1 of 9 (22/212; 10.4%) remained unpublished ≥ 4 years after initial trial reporting. Publication rates were highest for the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (97.4%) and lowest for the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (81.8%). Less than half of these published PROs met MCID and statistical significance thresholds (94/212; 44.3%). CONCLUSION: One in 9 PROs remained unpublished for ≥ 4 years after initial trial reporting, and compliance with CONSORT-PRO reporting guidelines was poor. Efforts should be made to ensure PROs are adequately reported and expeditiously published.

Feasibility of Physiotherapist-Led Rheumatology Triage: A Randomized Study.

OBJECTIVE: Given global shortages in the rheumatology workforce, the demand for rheumatology assessment often exceeds the capacity to provide timely access to care. Accurate triage of patient referrals is important to ensure appropriate utilization of finite resources. We assessed the feasibility of physiotherapist (PT)-led triage using a standardized protocol in identifying cases of inflammatory arthritis (IA), as compared to usual rheumatologist triage of referrals for joint pain, in a tertiary care rheumatology clinic. METHODS: We performed a single-center, prospective, nonblinded, randomized, parallel-group feasibility study with referrals randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either PT-led vs usual rheumatologist triage. Standardized information was collected at referral receipt, triage, and clinic visit. Rheumatologist diagnosis was considered the gold standard for diagnosis of IA. RESULTS: One hundred two referrals were randomized to the PT-led triage arm and 101 to the rheumatologist arm. In the PT-led arm, 65% of referrals triaged as urgent were confirmed to have IA vs 60% in the rheumatologist arm (P = 0.57), suggesting similar accuracy in identifying IA. More referrals were declined in the PT-led triage arm (24 vs 8, P = 0.002), resulting in fewer referrals triaged as semiurgent (6 vs 23, P = 0.003). One case of IA (rheumatologist arm) was incorrectly triaged, resulting in significant delay in time to first assessment. CONCLUSION: PT-led triage was feasible, appeared as reliable as rheumatologist triage of referrals for joint pain, and led to significantly fewer patients requiring in-clinic visits. This has implications for waitlist management and optimal rheumatology resource utilization.

Telerheumatology Shared-Care Model: Leveraging the Expertise of an Advanced Clinician Practitioner in Arthritis Care (ACPAC)-Trained Extended Role Practitioner in Rural-Remote Ontario.

OBJECTIVE: A shortage of rheumatologists has led to gaps in inflammatory arthritis (IA) care in Canada. Amplified in rural-remote communities, the number of rheumatologists practicing rurally has not been meaningfully increased, and alternate care strategies must be adopted. In this retrospective chart review, we describe the impact of a shared-care telerheumatology model using a community-embedded Advanced Clinician Practitioner in Arthritis Care (ACPAC)-extended role practitioner (ERP) and an urban-based rheumatologist. METHODS: A rheumatologist and an ACPAC-ERP established a monthly half-day hub-and-spoke-telerheumatology clinic to care for patients with suspected IA, triaged by the ACPAC-ERP. Comprehensive initial assessments were conducted in-person by the ACPAC-ERP (spoke); investigations were completed prior to the telerheumatology visit. Subsequent collaborative visits occurred with the rheumatologist (hub) attending virtually. Retrospective analysis of demographics, time-to-key care indices, patient-reported outcomes, clinical data, and estimated travel savings was performed. RESULTS: Data from 124 patients seen between January 2013 and January 2022 were collected; 98% (n = 494/504 visits) were virtual. The average age of patients at first visit was 55.6 years, and 75.8% were female. IA/connective tissue disease (CTD) was confirmed in 65% of patients. Mean time from primary care referral to ACPAC-ERP assessment was 52.5 days, and mean time from ACPAC-ERP assessment to the telerheumatology visit was 64.5 days. An estimated 493,470 km of patient-related travel was avoided. CONCLUSION: An ACPAC-ERP (spoke) and rheumatologist (hub) telerheumatology model of care assessing and managing patients with suspected IA in rural-remote Ontario was described. This model can be leveraged to increase capacity by delivering comprehensive virtual rheumatologic care in underserved communities.