The effect of smoking on cumulative damage in systemic lupus erythematosus: An incident cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between smoking history and pack-year exposure on the rate of end-organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: The SLE incident cohort included patients who met American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1997 or SLE International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) 2012 SLE criteria and had rheumatology encounters at a US academic institution (2008-16). The primary outcome was median time to SLICC/ACR damage index (SLICC/ACR-DI) increase or death. Main explanatory variables were smoking status and pack-years. Covariates included age, sex, race, ethnicity, receipt of Medicaid, neighborhood area deprivation index, and baseline SLE damage. Damage increase-free survival was evaluated by smoking status and pack-years using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods. RESULTS: Patients of Black race and Medicaid recipients were more commonly current smokers (p's < 0.05). Former smokers were older and more likely to have late-onset SLE (54% versus 33% of never and 29% of current smokers, p = 0.001). Median time to SLICC/ACR-DI increase or death was earlier in current or former compared to never smokers (4.5 and 3.4 versus 9.0 yrs; p = 0.002). In multivariable models, the rate of damage accumulation was twice as fast in current smokers (HR 2.18; 1.33, 3.57) and smokers with a >10 pack-year history (HR 2.35; 1.15, 3.64) versus never smokers. CONCLUSIONS: In this incident SLE cohort, past or current smoking predicted new SLE damage 4-5 years earlier. After adjustment, current smokers and patients with a pack-year history of >10 years accumulated damage at twice the rate of never smokers.

Nurse-led care for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: a review of the global literature and proposed strategies for implementation in Africa and the Middle East.

Globally, increasing demand for rheumatology services has led to a greater reliance on non-physician healthcare professionals (HCPs), such as rheumatology nurse specialists, to deliver care as part of a multidisciplinary team. Across Africa and the Middle East (AfME), there remains a shortage of rheumatology HCPs, including rheumatology nurses, which presents a major challenge to the delivery of rheumatology services, and subsequently the treatment and management of conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To further explore the importance of nurse-led care (NLC) for patients with RA and create a set of proposed strategies for the implementation of NLC in the AfME region, we used a modified Delphi technique. A review of the global literature was conducted using the PubMed search engine, with the most relevant publications selected. The findings were summarized and presented to the author group, which was composed of representatives from different countries and HCP disciplines. The authors also drew on their knowledge of the wider literature to provide context. Overall, results suggest that NLC is associated with improved patient perceptions of RA care, and equivalent or superior clinical and cost outcomes versus physician-led care in RA disease management. Expert commentary provided by the authors gives insights into the challenges of implementing nurse-led RA care. We further report practical proposed strategies for the development and implementation of NLC for patients with RA, specifically in the AfME region. These proposed strategies aim to act as a foundation for the introduction and development of NLC programs across the AfME region.

Effects of the SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic on U.S. rheumatology outpatient care delivery and use of telemedicine: an analysis of data from the RISE registry.

The SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic resulted in major disruptions to medical care. We aimed to understand changes in outpatient care delivery and use of telemedicine in U.S. rheumatology practices during this period. Rheumatology Informatics System Effectiveness (RISE) is a national, EHR-enabled registry that passively collects data on all patients seen by participating practices. Included practices were required to have been participating in RISE from January 2019 through August 2020 (N = 213). We compared total visit counts and telemedicine visits during March-August 2020 to March-August 2019 and stratified by locations in states with shelter-in-place (SIP) orders. We assessed characteristics of patients within each practice, including primary rheumatic diagnosis and disease activity scores, where available. We included 213 practices with 945,160 patients. Overall, we found visit counts decreased by 10.9% (from 1,302,455 to 1,161,051) between March and August 2020 compared to 2019; this drop was most dramatic during the month of April (- 22.3%). Telemedicine visits increased from 0% to a mean of 12.1%. Practices in SIP states had more dramatic decreases in visits, (11.5% vs. 5.3%). We found no major differences in primary diagnoses or disease activity across the two periods. We detected a meaningful decrease in rheumatology visits in March-August 2020 during the SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic compared to the year prior with a concomitant increase in the use of telemedicine. Future work should address possible adverse consequences to patient outcomes due to decreased contact with clinicians.

Prospective observational study to evaluate the use of musculoskeletal ultrasonography in rheumatoid arthritis management: the ECHO study.

OBJECTIVES: Since the creation of the Canadian Rheumatology Ultrasonography Society, an increasing number of rheumatologists has been trained in the use of musculoskeletal US (MSUS). We compared the effectiveness of MSUS to routine care (RC) as a disease management tool in patients with moderate-to-severe RA requiring a treatment change due to lack of efficacy. The predictive value of MSUS was also assessed. METHODS: This was a prospective, two-cohort, quasi-experimental study. Patients were managed either with MSUS (within the Canadian Rheumatology Ultrasonography Society) or as per RC for up to 1 year. Main outcomes included Clinical Disease Activity Index low disease activity/remission, DAS28 low disease activity/remission, MSUS scores, patient satisfaction and perception of participation in disease management. RESULTS: A total of 383 patients were enrolled (MSUS: n = 171; RC: n = 212). At baseline, a greater proportion of MSUS patients were treated with a biologic DMARD (50.3 vs 36.8%; P = 0.008) while more patients treated per RC received a non-biologic DMARD (84.2 vs 91.5%; P = 0.027). During follow-up, a greater number of RA treatment modifications was applied in the MSUS group compared with RC [adjusted incidence rate ratio (95% CI): 1.4 (1.1, 1.8)], including steroids, non-biologic DMARDs and biologic DMARDs. Regarding clinical and patient-reported outcomes, no remarkable differences were observed between groups. However, throughout the study, 50-80% of MSUS patients in clinical remission has a MSUS synovitis score of ≥1, and 37-73% an erosion score of ≥1. Significant associations were observed between baseline synovitis and joint erosion during follow-up. CONCLUSION: MSUS assessments can be useful in detecting subclinical levels of inflammation and predicting future joint deterioration, thus allowing optimization of RA treatment and patient care.

Application of the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology systemic lupus erythematosus classification criteria in clinical practice: a single center experience.

Originally developed as research tools, different classification criteria sets for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are also used to diagnose SLE in routine clinical care. The recently developed European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) 2019 criteria set is noted to perform better than previous SLE classification criteria. This study applied the new criteria schema to a tertiary center SLE cohort, ascertained its performance, and identified the clinical characteristics of patients who did not fulfill these criteria. From the 217 patients who were included, 11 (5%) did not meet the new criteria, mainly because of the antinuclear antibody entry criterion, resulting in a diagnostic sensitivity of 94%. Within this group, we found that constitutional and renal manifestations were unusual. Additionally, specific SLE antibodies as well as hypocomplementemia were less likely to be present. We did not observe a statistically significant difference in outcomes between the two groups of patients (fulfilling vs. unfulfilling the new criteria). We conclude that the EULAR/ACR criteria may misclassify a small subset of SLE patients with milder disease. It is important to be cognizant of key clinical and serologic features of these patients and treat them accordingly to prevent further irreversible damage.

Axial Spondyloarthritis: Overcoming the Barriers to Early Diagnosis-an Early Inflammatory Back Pain Service.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss the challenges to early diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and present the impact an early inflammatory back pain service (EIBPS) had on diagnostic delay in the UK. RECENT FINDINGS: Diagnostic delay in axSpA varies greatly worldwide, and has continued in the UK at an average of 8.5 years. Education, public awareness, and accessibility to inflammatory back pain (IBP) pathways are some of the key barriers to achieving a prompt diagnosis. A recent national inquiry has highlighted insufficiencies in the availability of specialist axSpA services and limited provision of education and training to first contact practitioners and allied healthcare providers. We demonstrate diagnostic delay in axSpA can be successfully reduced to 3 years when an early inflammatory back pain service is embedded within a rheumatology department alongside a local educational and awareness campaign. Sharing these experiences and outcomes will enable other departments to engage in best practice and achieve similar results, facilitating a timely and accurate diagnosis.

Evaluating the effect of prior authorizations in patients with complex dermatologic conditions.

BACKGROUND: In dermatology, prior authorizations can delay treatment, decrease patient adherence, and deter providers from advocating for their patients. Patients with complex dermatologic conditions, often requiring off-label treatments, may face particularly significant insurance barriers. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effect of prior authorizations in patients with complex dermatologic conditions. METHODS: This prospective cohort study assessed patients treated by a dermatologist during 5 months who specialized in complex dermatology. Patients included were older than 18 years, treated at V.P.W.'s rheumatology-dermatology clinic, and prescribed a medication or ordered a diagnostic procedure that elicited an insurance prior authorization. Data on prior authorization outcome, administrative time, and delay to treatment were collected. RESULTS: Of 51 prior authorizations, 51% were initially denied, with systemic medications more likely denied than topical ones (P < .001). Total administrative time spent on 50 prior authorizations tracked was 62.5 hours (median time per prior authorization 30 minutes [interquartile range 17-105 minutes]). Time to access treatment was tracked for 80% of prior authorizations; median delay was 12 days [interquartile range 5.5-23 days]. LIMITATIONS: Single-center, single-provider patient panel. CONCLUSION: Patients with complex dermatologic conditions face a significant barrier to care because of prior authorizations. The administrative burden for provider practices to address these prior authorizations is substantial and may warrant a streamlined system in collaboration with insurers.

Strategies for implementation of guideline recommended cardiovascular risk management for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a questionnaire survey of expert rheumatology centers.

The aim was to study the different strategies used to implement cardiovascular risk evaluation and management for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in daily clinical practice. A questionnaire survey was performed among both the members of the international Trans-Atlantic Cardiovascular Risk Consortium for Rheumatoid Arthritis (ATACC-RA) as well as the Survey of cardiovascular disease risk factors (CVD-RF) in patients with RA (SURF-RA) group. The questionnaire included 18 questions with the overarching topics: (1) organization and responsibility of cardiovascular risk management (CVRM); (2) screening of CVD-RFs; (3) overview current CVRM status; and (4) availability of data regarding CVRM. Based on the answers, two researchers (JW, PR) independently categorized the different strategies. Thirteen out of 27 rheumatology centers responded to the questionnaire. One rheumatology center did not have organized CVRM for their RA patients. Among the other centers, three strategies to organize CVRM in daily practice were distinguished: (1) the rheumatologist performs CVRM during outpatient visits (n = 6); (2) cardiologists and rheumatologists co-operate in a cardio-rheuma-clinic/team with different tasks and responsibilities (n = 3); and (3) the general practitioner screens and intervenes on CVD-RFs (n = 3). Each CVRM strategy was based on agreements between medical professionals and was also dependent on the national healthcare system and available financial resources. Three strategies were identified for CVRM implementation in daily clinical practice based on who is primarily responsible for performing CVRM. More research is warranted to compare their relative merits and effectiveness in relation to CVRM.

Clinical practice guidance for juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) 2018-Update.

Juvenile dermatomyositis is the most common type of juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathy mainly affecting the skin and proximal muscles. We have published the Japanese version of 'Clinical practice guidance for juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) 2018 'consisting of a review of articles in the field and evidence-informed consensus-based experts' opinion on the treatment strategy in collaboration with The Pediatric Rheumatology Association of Japan and The Japan College of Rheumatology under the financial support by 'Research on rare and intractable diseases, Health and Labor Sciences Research Grants'. This article is a digest version of the Japanese guidance.

The European network for care of children with paediatric rheumatic diseases: care across borders.

OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of the paediatric rheumatology (PR) services in Europe, describe current delivery of care and training, set standards for care, identify unmet needs and inform future specialist service provision. METHODS: An online survey was developed and presented to national coordinating centres of the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) (country survey) and to individual PR centres (centre and disease surveys) as a part of the European Union (EU) Single Hub and Access point for paediatric Rheumatology in Europe project. The survey contained components covering the organization of PR care, composition of teams, education, health care and research facilities and assessment of needs. RESULTS: Response rates were 29/35 (83%) for country surveys and 164/288 (57%) for centre surveys. Across the EU, approximately one paediatric rheumatologist is available per million population. In all EU member states there is good access to specialist care and medications, although biologic drug availability is worse in Eastern European countries. PR education is widely available for physicians but is insufficient for allied health professionals. The ability to participate in clinical trials is generally high. Important gaps were identified, including lack of standardized clinical guidelines/recommendations and insufficient adolescent transition management planning. CONCLUSION: This study provides a comprehensive description of current specialist PR service provision across Europe and did not reveal any major differences between EU member states. Rarity, chronicity and complexity of diseases are major challenges to PR care. Future work should facilitate the development, dissemination and implementation of standards of care, treatment and service recommendations to further improve patient-centred health care across Europe.

[Outpatient specialist medical treatment (ASV)-a new treatment level in rheumatology]. / Ambulante spezialfachärztliche Versorgung (ASV) ­ eine neue Versorgungsebene in der Rheumatologie.

Since April 2018, the new third level care model of outpatient specialist care (ASV) according to §116b of the Social Code Book V (SGBV) has been available for patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases in Germany. Not only is a multiprofessional cooperation between the disciplines involved in treating rheumatic diseases promoted but also the cooperation between specialized rheumatologists and other specialists in private practice and in hospitals is encouraged. As budget capping limiting services and number of cases do not apply in ASV, a significant improvement of patient care in rheumatology is expected due to an increase in provider capacity. At the end of May 2019, 72 rheumatologists in the first 9 newly approved ASV teams had qualified for this new care concept. Bureaucratic obstacles have so far delayed the implementation of ASV. Difficulties arose in building a team with different specialties, in the process of registration of the teams and the assessment of the registration by certain regional boards responsible for access control. The national associations of rheumatologists, the Professional Association of German Rheumatologists (BDRh), the VRA (Verband der Rheumatologischen Akutkliniken e. V.) and the German Society of Rheumatology (DGRh) campaign for an easier admission of providers to the ASV and for adequate financing of all specialties involved in the ASV. The aim is to realize the chance of the ASV for better rheumatological care nationwide with shorter waiting times for a medical appointment and a better cooperation between specialists.

[Experiences and results from Rheuma-VOR]. / Erfahrungen und Ergebnisse aus Rheuma-VOR.

Rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondylarthritis are the most common chronic autoimmune rheumatic diseases. For all three diseases an early diagnosis and initiation of treatment is crucial. The proof of concept network study "Rheuma-VOR" is a further developed version of the predecessor project ADAPTHERA and was extended to several federal states. The aim of this prospective study is to improve the early diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondylarthritis and thus positively impact the quality of care for patients with the help of multidisciplinary coordinating centers. To date 3710 disease-specific questionnaires from patients with the suspected diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis or axial spondylarthritis from 1298 different primary care providers were registered in the multidisciplinary coordination centers. A total of 1958 appointments were made with 1 of the 53 participating rheumatology specialists. In 876 patients, 1 of the 3 rheumatic diseases was diagnosed in an early stage. The waiting period was on average 42.5 days depending on the federal state, which is well below the nationwide average. It should also be noted that the coordinated cooperation and risk stratification of the Rheuma-VOR coordination centers relieved the capacity of rheumatology specialists by 1281 appointments (34.5%). In addition, the 2­week Rheuma Bus Tour and the accompanying initiatives in Rhineland-Palatinate (Rheuma-VOR screening app and the triage consultation) are showing first promising positive results.

Planning for the Rheumatologist Workforce: Factors Associated With Work Hours and Volumes.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate factors associated with rheumatologists' clinical work hours and patient volumes based on a national workforce survey in rheumatology. METHODS: Adult rheumatologists who participated in a 2015 workforce survey were included (n = 255). Univariate analysis evaluated the relationship between demographics (sex, age, academic vs. community practice, billing fee for service vs. other plan, years in practice, retirement plans) and workload (total hours and number of ½-day clinics per week) or patient volumes (number of new and follow-up consults per week). Multiple linear regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between practice type, sex, age, and working hours or clinical volumes. RESULTS: Male rheumatologists had more ½-day clinics (p = 0.05) and saw more new patients per week (p = 0.001) compared with females. Community rheumatologists had more ½-day clinics and new and follow-up visits per week (all p < 0.01). Fee-for-service rheumatologists reported more ½-day clinics per week (p < 0.001) and follow-ups (p = 0.04). Workload did not vary by age, years in practice, or retirement plans. In multivariate analysis, community practice remained independently associated with higher patient volumes and more clinics per week. Female rheumatologists reported fewer clinics and fewer follow-up patients per week than males, but this did not affect the duration of working hours or new consultations. Age was not associated with work volumes or hours. CONCLUSIONS: Practice type and rheumatologist sex should be considered when evaluating rheumatologist workforce needs, as the proportion of female rheumatologists has increased over time and alternative billing practices have been introduced in many centers.

Assessing Unwanted Variations in Rheumatology Clinic Previsit Rooming.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatologists face time pressures similar to primary care but have not generally benefitted from optimized team-based rooming during the time from the waiting room until the rheumatologist enters the room. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess current capacity for population management in rheumatology clinics; we aimed to measure the tasks performed by rheumatology clinic staff (medical assistants or nurses) during rooming. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional time-study and work-system analysis to measure rooming workflows at 3 rheumatology clinics in an academic multispecialty practice during 2014-2015. We calculated descriptive statistics and compared frequencies and durations using Fisher exact test and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Observing 190 rheumatology clinic previsit rooming sequences (1419 minutes), we found many significant variations. Total rooming duration varied by clinic (median, 6.75-8.25 minutes; p < 0.001). Vital sign measurement and medication reconciliation accounted for more than half of rooming duration. Among 3 clinics, two of 15 tasks varied significantly in duration, and 9 varied in frequency. Findings led clinic leaders to modify policies and procedures regarding 6 high-variation tasks streamlining assessment of weight, height, pain scores, tobacco use, disease activity, and refill needs. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing rheumatology rooming tasks identified key opportunities to improve quality and efficiency without burdening providers. This project demonstrated user-friendly methods to identify opportunities to standardize rooming and support data-driven decisions regarding rheumatology clinic practice changes to improve population management in rheumatology.

Recommendations for collaborative paediatric research including biobanking in Europe: a Single Hub and Access point for paediatric Rheumatology in Europe (SHARE) initiative.

Innovative research in childhood rheumatic diseases mandates international collaborations. However, researchers struggle with significant regulatory heterogeneity; an enabling European Union (EU)-wide framework is missing. The aims of the study were to systematically review the evidence for best practice and to establish recommendations for collaborative research. The Paediatric Rheumatology European Single Hub and Access point for paediatric Rheumatology in Europe (SHARE) project enabled a scoping review and expert discussion, which then informed the systematic literature review. Published evidence was synthesised; recommendations were drafted. An iterative review process and consultations with Ethics Committees and European experts for ethical and legal aspects of paediatric research refined the recommendations. SHARE experts and patient representatives vetted the proposed recommendations at a consensus meeting using Nominal Group Technique. Agreement of 80% was mandatory for inclusion. The systematic literature review returned 1319 records. A total of 223 full-text publications plus 22 international normative documents were reviewed; 85 publications and 16 normative documents were included. A total of 21 recommendations were established including general principles (1-3), ethics (4-7), paediatric principles (8 and 9), consent to paediatric research (10-14), paediatric databank and biobank (15 and 16), sharing of data and samples (17-19), and commercialisation and third parties (20 and 21). The refined recommendations resulted in an agreement of >80% for all recommendations. The SHARE initiative established the first recommendations for Paediatric Rheumatology collaborative research across borders in Europe. These provide strong support for an urgently needed European framework and evidence-based guidance for its implementation. Such changes will promote research in children with rheumatic diseases.

Patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis become adults: the role of transitional care.

Most juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients need to attend adult rheumatology centres to continue the clinical management of their disease and to receive adequate long-term treatment. Transition from the paediatric to the adult health care team is a critical moment in the clinical history of these patients, but unfortunately, about 50% of the transfer processes to adult rheumatology are not successful, putting these patients at high risk of unfavourable outcomes. There are several obstacles to the success of transitional care for JIA patients, such as the absence of specific criteria for the assessment of disease activity, the lack of specific treatment recommendations for JIA adult patients, the poor adolescent-specific training for adult rheumatologists, and the shortage of resources. The improvement in the transition process in medical care has become a priority in many health care systems, but not many studies evaluating transition models, and common methodologies for measuring transition outcomes are available. The aim of this review is to identify and describe the models of transitional care in JIA, providing insights and recommendations to develop effective transitional care models in this disease.

Rheumatology science and practice in India.

The practice of rheumatology in a country like India presents its own unique challenges, including the need to manage patients in a cost-constrained setting, where the lack of uniform government funding for healthcare merits the need to optimize the use of cheaper medicines, as well as devise innovative strategies to minimize the use of costlier drugs such as biologic disease-modifying agents. Use of immunosuppressive agents is also associated with increased risks of infectious complications, such as the reactivation of tuberculosis. In this narrative review, we provide a flavor of such challenges unique to Rheumatology practice in India, and review the published literature on the management of common rheumatic diseases from India. In addition, we critically review existing guidelines for the management of rheumatic diseases from this part of the world. We also discuss infectious etiologies of rheumatic complaints, such as leprosy, tuberculosis, and Chikungunya arthritis, which are often encountered here, and pose a diagnostic as well as therapeutic challenge for clinicians. There remains a need to identify and test more cost-effective strategies for Indian patients with rheumatic diseases, as well as the requirement for more government participation to enhance scant facilities for the treatment of such diseases as well as foster the development of healthcare services such as specialist nurses, occupational therapists and physiotherapists to enable better management of these conditions.

Evaluation of CIAP (Clarification, Illustration, Application, Participation) as a teaching tool in rheumatology.

INTRODUCTION: The CIAP (Clarification, Illustration, Application, Participation) teaching, was adopted by our faculty since 1988. It allows a pedagogical approach favoring teacher / student contact. It puts the disciple in the center of the work. However, this method has been initiated for a long time, its actual place in our teaching is not yet well established and not all teachers adhere to it because it has never been evaluated before. AIM: To evaluate the CIAP teaching in rheumatology in abarticular shoulder pathology in DCEM1 students. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of students in DCEM1 during the internship at the Kassab institute. Students were informed about the teaching (CIAP) a week before so they could read their corresponding self-teaching module in advance. A pre-test and a post-test were prepared in advance as well as an evaluation of the teaching by the learners. RESULTS: We founded after this teaching, an improvement of the score of the pre-test with a progression of the means statistically significant (p <10-3). Concerning the assessment of CIAP teaching by our learners in terms of relevance in general, organization and implementation, it showed a majority of satisfaction with a predominance of a "2" rating according to the scale of Likert. CONCLUSION: Our work has highlighted a positive impact and a good adhesion of students to the abarticular pathology by the CIAP teaching.

Fracture Liaison Services.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to report the evidence of beneficial effects of Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) including data regarding their impact on subsequent fracture, mortality risk and cost-effectiveness. This review also discusses the limitations of these data and the challenges faced during the implementation of FLS. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies showed the beneficial impact of implementation of FLS on the prevention of subsequent fracture risk, reduced mortality and cost-effectiveness. However, heterogeneity of FLS models and small number of studies limited the conclusion about the impact of FLS on secondary fracture prevention. SUMMARY: Patients with osteoporosis-related fractures are at higher risk of subsequent refractures. These subsequent fractures are associated with increased morbidity and premature mortality. However, there is a gap between evidence-based recommendations for postfracture care and actual clinical practice. FLS care is recommended for the management of the prevention of secondary fracture. FLS implementation reduces the risk of subsequent fracture, but the level of evidence is low as the interpretation of data is limited by the number of studies and their heterogeneity. FLS care significantly reduces the postfracture mortality, especially in patients with hip fractures. FLS implementation is cost-effective compared with usual care. Additional studies (with large sample and long-term follow-up) are needed to assess the impact of FLS care on subsequent fracture risk.

2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and their major subgroups.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate new classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) and their major subgroups. METHODS: Candidate variables were assembled from published criteria and expert opinion using consensus methodology. Data were collected from 47 rheumatology, dermatology, neurology and paediatric clinics worldwide. Several statistical methods were used to derive the classification criteria. RESULTS: Based on data from 976 IIM patients (74% adults; 26% children) and 624 non-IIM patients with mimicking conditions (82% adults; 18% children), new criteria were derived. Each item is assigned a weighted score. The total score corresponds to a probability of having IIM. Subclassification is performed using a classification tree. A probability cut-off of 55%, corresponding to a score of 5.5 (6.7 with muscle biopsy) 'probable IIM', had best sensitivity/specificity (87%/82% without biopsies, 93%/88% with biopsies) and is recommended as a minimum to classify a patient as having IIM. A probability of ≥90%, corresponding to a score of ≥7.5 (≥8.7 with muscle biopsy), corresponds to 'definite IIM'. A probability of <50%, corresponding to a score of <5.3 (<6.5 with muscle biopsy), rules out IIM, leaving a probability of ≥50 to <55% as 'possible IIM'. CONCLUSIONS: The European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) classification criteria for IIM have been endorsed by international rheumatology, dermatology, neurology and paediatric groups. They employ easily accessible and operationally defined elements, and have been partially validated. They allow classification of 'definite', 'probable' and 'possible' IIM, in addition to the major subgroups of IIM, including juvenile IIM. They generally perform better than existing criteria.