A Retrospective Study of 1076 Cases of Shoulder Dislocation at a Single Center in Türkiye to Evaluate the Role of Post-Reduction Radiography in the Detection of Clinically Significant Fractures.

BACKGROUND The role of post-reduction radiography in patients with shoulder dislocation remains controversial. Therefore, this retrospective study of 1076 cases of shoulder dislocation at a single center in Türkiye aimed to evaluate the role of post-reduction radiography in the detection of clinically significant fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with radiographically confirmed anterior shoulder dislocation were included in the study, and their demographic data, mechanism of injury, pre- and post-reduction radiograph readings, reduction method, and patient outcome were recorded. The study analyzed patients who had pre- and post-reduction anterior-posterior and axillary shoulder radiographs. RESULTS During the 44-month study period, a total of 1076 patients were examined, and their pre- and post-reduction radiographs were reviewed by an independent radiologist. Of these patients, 27 (2.6%) had a fracture on their pre-reduction radiographs, while 32 (3.1%) had a fracture on their post-reduction radiographs. The difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (P=0.142). The study found that patients who did not undergo a post-reduction radiograph spent an average of 106 min in the emergency department, while patients who had the radiograph and were discharged spent an average of 237 min. The hospital stay of patients who had the radiograph was also significantly longer (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Our study supports that routine use of post-reduction radiographs in all cases of anterior shoulder dislocation may not be necessary and could potentially expose patients to unnecessary radiation exposure and healthcare costs. Shortening the examination time in the emergency department by not taking a follow-up radiograph will help prevent overcrowding.

Clinical and radiographic results of locking plate with medial support screw in Proximal Humerus fracture - the more, the better?

BACKGROUND: The calcar of the proximal humerus is a fundamental structure for medial humeral column support. This study aimed to assess the outcome of osteosynthesis across cases of unstable proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) with medial calcar comminution, following treatment with a PHILOS locking plate and medial support screw (MSS). METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2018, we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 121 cases of osteosynthesis for PHFs with medial column disruption. For the medial support, at least one oblique screw was inserted within 5 mm of the subchondral bone in the inferomedial quadrant of the humeral head. All patients were categorized into two groups: 26 patients in the single MSS group, and 95 in the multiple MSS group. Follow-up after at least an year involved clinical and radiographic outcome evaluations, and correspondingly measuring the Constant-Murley score, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder scale, pain visual analogue scale (VAS), major complications, neck-shaft angle (NSA), humeral head height (HHH), and the eventual time to bone union. Risk factors for the major complications were assessed by multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The cohort's mean age was 64.4 ± 15.4 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 19.5 ± 7.6 months. At the final follow-up, between the single MSS and multiple MSS groups, no significant differences in the Constant-Murley score (p = 0.367), UCLA score (p = 0.558), VAS (p = 0.571), time to bone union (p = 0.621), NSA loss (p = 0.424), and HHH loss (p = 0.364) were observed. The incidence of complications (p = 0.446) based on the number of MSS were not significantly different. The initial insufficient reduction after surgery (of NSA < 125°) was found to be a significant risk factor for post-surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS: To treat unstable PHFs, the use of at least one MSS along with a locking plate system is sufficient to achieve satisfactory outcomes. Successful operative treatment using a locking plate for PHF treatment is inherent in anatomical fracture reduction, coupled with medial column support.

Straight intramedullary MultiLoc nails for displaced proximal humeral fractures: health status, radiographic results, clinical outcome, and complications.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of the displaced proximal humerus fractures (PHF) still facing a lot of unsolved problems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effect of MultiLoc nails for the treatment of PHF and present outcomes of patients with different Neer's classification and reduction quality. METHODS: Adult patients with PHFs were recruited and treated with MultiLoc nail. Intraoperative data, radiographic and functional outcomes, as well as occurrence of postoperative complications were assessed. RESULTS: 48 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in this study. The DASH Score were 32.2 ± 3.1 points at 12 months, and 37.3 ± 2.5 points at the final follow-up. The mean ASES score at 12 months and final follow-up were 74.4 ± 6.2 and 78.8 ± 5.1, respectively. The mean CM Score in all 48 patients reached 68 ± 6.4 points at the final follow-up, relative side related CM Score 75.2 ± 7.7% of contralateral extremity. The incidence rate of complications was 20.8%. Patients with fracture mal-union, adhesive capsulitis were observed but no secondary surgeries were performed. There was no significantly difference of DASH Score 12 months after surgery and at the last follow-up among patients with different Neer's classification or reduction quality. However, functional outcomes such as ASES score and CM score were significantly influenced by severity of fracture and the quality of fracture reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that MultiLoc nails is well suited for proximal humeral fractures, with satisfactory health status recovery, good radiographic results, positive clinical outcomes and low rates of complications. The treatment for four part PHF still faces great challenges. Accurate fracture reduction was an important factor for good functional result.

Cement-augmented locked plate fixation proximal humerus fractures in elderly patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This systemic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of proximal humeral fracture in elderly patient fixation using locked plate with or without cement augmentation. METHODS: The databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched in August 2023 for literature comparing the clinical outcomes of patients with PHFs treated with locked plate alone and locked plate augmented with cement. Data describing study design; level of evidence; inclusion criteria; demographic information; final follow-up; revision rate; implant failure rate; avascular necrosis rate; total complication rate; constant score; and disability of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score were collected. RESULTS: Eight studies (one randomized-controlled trial and seven observational studies), involving 664 patients, were identified. Compared with locked plates alone, using cement-augmented locked plates reduced the implant failure rate (odds ratio (OR) = 0.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10-0.39; P < 0.0001) and total complication rate (OR = 0.45; 95% CI 0.29-0.69; P = 0.0002) and improved DASH scores (mean difference (MD) = 2.99; 95% CI 1.00-4.98; P = 0.003). However, there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes, including revision rate, avascular necrosis rate, and constant score. CONCLUSION: In this review and meta-analysis, fixation of the PHFs in elderly patients using locked plates with or without cement augmentation has no significant difference in revision rate, but the implant failure and total complication rates may be lesser on using the cement-augmented locked plate for fixation than on using a locked plate alone. Good results are expected for most patients treated with this technique. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)21 guidelines were followed to conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis and was registered as a protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42022318798).

Clinical validation of artificial intelligence-based preoperative virtual reduction for Neer 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fractures.

BACKGROUND: If reduction images of fractures can be provided in advance with artificial-intelligence (AI)-based technology, it can assist with preoperative surgical planning. Recently, we developed the AI-based preoperative virtual reduction model for orthopedic trauma, which can provide an automatic segmentation and reduction of fractured fragments. The purpose of this study was to validate a quality of reduction model of Neer 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fractures established by AI-based technology. METHODS: To develop the AI-based preoperative virtual reduction model, deep learning performed the segmentation of fracture fragments, and a Monte Carlo simulation completed the virtual reduction to determine the best model. A total of 20 pre/postoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scans of proximal humerus fracture were prepared. The preoperative CT scans were employed as the input of AI-based automated reduction (AI-R) to deduce the reduction models of fracture fragments, meanwhile, the manual reduction (MR) was conducted using the same CT images. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and intersection over union (IoU) between the reduction model from the AI-R/MR and postoperative CT scans were evaluated. Working times were compared between the two groups. Clinical validity agreement (CVA) and reduction quality score (RQS) were investigated for clinical validation outcomes by 20 orthopedic surgeons. RESULTS: The mean DSC and IoU were better when using AI-R that when using MR (0.78 ± 0.13 vs. 0.69 ± 0.16, p < 0.001 and 0.65 ± 0.16 vs. 0.55 ± 0.18, p < 0.001, respectively). The working time of AI-R was, on average, 1.41% of that of MR. The mean CVA of all cases was 81%±14.7% (AI-R, 82.25%±14.27%; MR, 76.75%±14.17%, p = 0.06). The mean RQS was significantly higher when AI-R compared with MR was used (91.47 ± 1.12 vs. 89.30 ± 1.62, p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: The AI-based preoperative virtual reduction model showed good performance in the reduction model in proximal humerus fractures with faster working times. Beyond diagnosis, classification, and outcome prediction, the AI-based technology can change the paradigm of preoperative surgical planning in orthopedic surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Mid- to long-term outcome of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty as revision procedure for failed hemiarthroplasty after proximal humerus fracture.

BACKGROUND: Insufficient tuberosity healing is the most common reason for poor outcome after treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) using hemiarthroplasty (HA). In these cases, revision to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) can improve function and reduce pain in the short term, however, long-term results remain scarce. Aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological mid- to long-term results in patients with a revision RTSA after failed HA for PHF. METHODS: In this retrospective study all patients that received a revision to RTSA after failed fracture HA between 2006 and 2018 were included. A total of 49 shoulders in 48 patients (38 female, 10 male; mean age 82 ± 9 years) were identified in our database. A total of 20 patients (17 female, 3 male; mean age was 79 ± 9 years) were available for follow-up examination after a mean time period of approximately eight years (3-14 years) after revision surgery. At final follow-up, patients were assessed using a subjective shoulder value (SSV), range of motion (ROM), visual analogue score (VAS), the Constant Score (CS) and the 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12). RESULTS: At final follow-up, mean CS was 55 ± 19 (19-91), VAS averaged 3 ± 3 (0-8) and mean SSV was 61 ± 18% (18-90%). Mean SF-12 was 44 (28-57) with a mean physical component summary (PCS) of 38 (21-56) and a mean mental component summary (MCS) of 51 (29-67). On average active forward flexion (FF) was 104° (10-170°), active abduction (ABD) was 101° (50-170°), active external rotation (ER) was 19° (10-30°) and active internal rotation (IR) of the lumbosacral transition was reached. Three patients presented with a periprosthetic humeral fracture after RTSA implantation and underwent a reoperation (15%) during follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Revision RTSA results in promising clinical results in patients after initial failed HA after PHF. A complication and reoperation rate of 15% is tolerable in consideration of satisfactory functional and psychological outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered.

Clinical and radiographic long-term outcomes of hemiarthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures.

BACKGROUND: Hemiarthroplasty (HA) is a treatment option for complex proximal humeral fractures not suitable for conservative treatment or open reduction-internal fixation. Long-term outcomes using a large-metaphyseal volume prosthesis in the management of proximal humeral fractures have not been reported thus far. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2010, 41 patients with proximal humeral fractures were treated with HA at our institution (average age, 62 years; age range, 38-85 years). Nine patients underwent revision surgery, 3 were lost to follow-up, and 7 died unrelated to the index surgical procedure. Twenty-two patients were reviewed clinically and radiographically after a mean period of 10.4 years (range, 9-13 years). RESULTS: Of the 9 HA failures, 7 occurred within the first 2 postoperative years: 2 patients had infections and 5 had greater tuberosity nonunions or malunions. The other 2 patients underwent revision for rotator cuff deficiency >5 years after initial surgery. Among the patients available for final follow-up, the implant survival rate was 71% (22 of 31 patients). At final follow-up, these patients showed a mean relative Constant score of 76% (range, 49%-96%), mean active elevation of 116° (range, 60°-170°), and mean external rotation of 28° (range, 0°-55°). The majority had good or excellent internal rotation, with internal rotation to the 12th thoracic vertebra in 13 patients (59%) and to the eighth thoracic vertebra in 7 (31%). The mean Subjective Shoulder Value was 76% (range, 40%-100%). Clinical outcomes did not significantly deteriorate over a period of 10 years, except for flexion (P < .001) and internal rotation (P = .002). On analysis of greater tuberosity healing, 1 patient had a nonunion and 10 patients (45%) had a malunion, whereas the greater tuberosity had healed in an anatomic position in 12 patients (55%). Patients with a displaced malunion of the greater tuberosity did not have inferior clinical results at last follow-up. Only 2 patients showed glenoid erosion, and in no patients could stem loosening be identified at final follow-up. CONCLUSION: The revision rate following large-metaphyseal volume HA to treat a proximal humeral fracture was 29% after 10 years postoperatively, with failure within 2 years largely related to greater tuberosity nonunion or malunion and failure later related to rotator cuff insufficiency. Patients with a retained implant showed good clinical and radiographic long-term results, without relevant deterioration over time even when the greater tuberosity healed in a nonanatomic position.

A new clinical sign to detect radiologically occult greater tuberosity fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Up to 59% of undisplaced greater tuberosity (GT) fractures are missed on initial evaluation. Timely diagnosis of these injuries can avoid undue morbidity, but a clinical sign to accurately identify them has not previously been described. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the gold standard for their assessment but may not be routinely available, or difficult to organize urgently. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of a new clinical sign (the anterior bruise sign [ABS]), in diagnosing radiologically occult GT fractures. METHODS: Over a 4-year period, 59 patients who sustained a traumatic shoulder injury with no fracture on initial radiographs were referred to a specialist shoulder clinic within a week of their injury and enrolled in a prospective observational cohort study. At initial presentation, the presence of anterior arm bruising extending to the mid-diaphysis was recorded as a positive ABS. MRI assessment of the injured shoulder was performed in all patients at first follow-up. Presenting radiographs, 2-week radiographs, and MRI scans were reviewed by a musculoskeletal radiologist. The diagnostic value of a positive ABS was compared with 2-week radiographs, and other clinical tests. RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 58.5 (range 30-79) years, and 27 (45.8%) were female. The mean time from injury to first follow-up was 6.9 (standard deviation 2.4) days. MRI revealed that 25 of 59 patients (42.4%) had an undisplaced GT fracture. The overall accuracy of the ABS in identifying occult GT fractures was 98% (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 97%, positive predictive value = 96%, negative predictive value = 100%, P < .001). In contrast, radiographs taken at 2 weeks postinjury were less accurate (71.2%) (P < .001), and other clinical assessments of cuff function had much lower accuracy. CONCLUSION: In patients presenting with a traumatic shoulder injury with normal radiographs, the ABS is a highly sensitive and specific clinical aid to identify patients with an occult GT fracture.

Does age affect patient outcomes after humeral head replacement in the treatment of acute proximal humeral fractures? A comparative cohort study with a minimum 10 years long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Humeral head replacement (HHR) is now rarely recommended for complex proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) in older patients. However, in relatively young and active patients with unreconstructable complex PHFs, controversy still exists regarding the treatment options of reverse shoulder arthroplasty and HHR. The goal of this study was to compare the survival, functional, and radiographic outcomes of HHR in patients aged <70 years and those aged ≥70 years after a minimum 10 years follow-up. METHODS: Eighty-seven out of 135 patients undergoing primary HHR were enrolled and then divided into 2 groups based on age: <70 years and ≥70 years. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. RESULTS: There were 64 patients (mean, 54.9 years) in the younger group and 23 patients (mean, 73.5 years) in the older group. The younger and older groups had comparable 10-year implant survivorship (98.4% vs. 91.3%). Patients aged ≥70 years had worse American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (74.2 vs. 81.0, P = .042) and lower satisfaction rates (12% vs. 64%, P < .001) than younger patients. At the final follow-up, older patients had worse forward flexion (117° vs. 129°, P = .047) and internal rotation (17 vs. 15, P = .036). More greater tuberosity complications (39% vs. 16%, P = .019), glenoid erosion (100% vs. 59%, P = .077), and humeral head superior migration (80% vs. 31%, P = .037) were also identified in patients aged ≥70 years. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike the increased risk for revision and functional deterioration over time after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for PHFs in younger patients, a high implant survival rate with lasting pain relief and stable functional outcomes could be observed in younger patients after HHR during long-term follow-up. Patients aged ≥70 years had worse clinical outcomes, lower patient satisfaction, more greater tuberosity complications, and more glenoid erosion and humeral head superior migration than those aged <70 years. HHR should not be recommended for the treatment of unreconstructable complex acute PHFs in older patient populations.

Pectoralis major pedicle bone grafting vs. tricortical iliac grafting for Neer 4-part proximal humerus fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The risk of avascular necrosis, nonunion, or malunion is high in osteoporosis-related 4-part fractures. We evaluated the results of patients who underwent plate osteosynthesis with a vascularized pectoralis major graft compared with tricortical iliac grafting to treat 4-part proximal humerus fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients aged 50-75 years with Neer 4-part proximal humerus fractures were studied. Group A (n = 17) underwent osteotomy of a 2.5 ± 1 cm pectoralis major pedicle bone graft and plate application, whereas group B (n = 17) underwent plate osteosynthesis using iliac autogenous grafts. Final follow-up assessments included evaluation using Constant and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scoring systems, humeral neck-shaft angle (HNSA), humeral head height, and humeral head avascular necrosis. RESULTS: Reduction loss was observed in 3 patients (17.6%) in group A, whereas it was observed in 10 patients (58.8%) in group B (P = .013). Humeral head avascular necrosis was found in 1 patient (5.8%) in group A, whereas it was found in 5 patients (29.4%) in the other group (P = .071). The HNSA was normal in 12 (70.5%) of group A patients, whereas it was normal in 6 (35.2%) of group B patients. The HNSA was weak or bad (<1200) in 29.4% of group A patients, whereas this rate was 64.7% in group B patients. Humeral head height was 2.64 ± 1.45 mm in group A and 3.66 ± 1.65 mm in group B. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of Constant and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scoring systems. CONCLUSION: Pectoralis major bone pedicle graft in Neer 4-part proximal humerus fractures reduces the risk of avascular necrosis and nonunion rates. Our technique yielded excellent clinical and radiological results. We achieved recovery without creating additional donor site morbidity.

Acromion fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty occur in predictable clusters.

BACKGROUND: Acromion and scapular spine fractures (ASFs) following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have been reported at a rate of 3.9%. The location of the fracture has been shown to be an important factor in determining the outcomes of nonoperative treatment, with medial fractures having worse outcomes than lateral fractures. As the debate between operative and nonoperative treatment continues, a more precise understanding of the location of the fracture is necessary for effective management. The purpose of this study was to use 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) reconstruction to characterize the exact location of ASFs after RSA. METHODS: A retrospective review of 2 separate institutional shoulder and elbow repositories was performed. Patients with post-RSA ASFs documented by post-fracture CT scans were included. The query identified 48 patients who sustained postoperative ASFs after RSA between July 2008 and September 2021. CT scans of patients with ASFs were segmented using Mimics software. Eight patients were excluded because of poor image quality. Each bone model was manipulated using 3-Matic Medical software to align the individual scapula with an idealized bone model to create a view of scapular fracture locations on a normalized bone model. This model was used to classify the fractures using the modified Levy classification. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 40 patients with a diagnosis of postoperative ASF after RSA. The median age at the time of surgery was 76 years (interquartile range, 73-79 years). The cohort comprised 32 women (80%) and 8 men (20%), with a median body mass index of 27.8. Only 10 patients (25%) had a previous diagnosis of osteoporosis and 6 (13%) had a diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis; 53% of patients underwent RSA owing to rotator cuff tear arthropathy. The distribution of fracture locations was similar within the cohort. However, lateral fractures were slightly more prevalent. The most common fracture location was the type I zone, with 12 fracture lines (29%). There were 11 fracture lines (26%) in the type IIa zone, 10 (23%) in the type IIb zone, 0 in the type IIc zone, and 9 (21%) in the type III zone. CONCLUSION: ASFs after RSA occur in 4 predictable clusters. No fractures appeared to distinctly cluster in the type IIc zone, which may not represent a true fracture zone. Understanding the distribution of these fractures will help to enable the future design of implants and devices to stabilize the fractures that require fixation.

Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures in Adolescents: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus fractures (PHFx) constitute around 2% of all pediatric fractures. Although younger children with displaced fractures often undergo nonoperative treatments, optimal treatment for adolescents is not well defined. The study aimed to assess the outcomes of operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures in adolescents via a prospective multicenter study. METHODS: This prospective study assessed adolescents aged 10 to 16 years with displaced PHFx from 2018 to 2022 at 6 level 1 trauma centers. Displacement criteria for inclusion were >50% shaft diameter or angulation >30 degrees on AP/lateral shoulder X-rays. Operative versus nonoperative treatment was decided by the treating physician. Radiographic and clinical data were collected at 6 weeks, 3, and 6 months. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) included: Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMIS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and QuickDASH questionnaires. Patients were further grouped into a severe displacement cohort, defined as angulation >40° or displacement >75%. Clinical and radiographic data were compared between the 2 treatment cohorts. RESULTS: Out of 78 enrolled patients, 36 (46%) underwent operative treatment. Patients treated operatively were significantly older (13.5 vs. 12.2 y, P <0.001) and exhibited greater mean angulation on AP shoulder view at presentation (31.1° vs. 23.5°, P <0.05). All PROs improved over time. At 6 weeks, operative patients demonstrated superior PROMIS upper extremity scores based on the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) (46.4 vs. 34.3, P =0.027); however, this distinction disappeared by 3 months. In a subanalysis of 35 patients with severe displacement, 21 (60.1%) underwent surgical intervention. No metrics showed significant differences between treatment modalities, with all PROs achieving population norm values by 3 months. Range of motion showed no difference between operative and nonoperative treatments, irrespective of fracture displacement. CONCLUSION: We found no differences in PROs and ROM between operative and nonoperative treatments of PHFx. If not contraindicated, nonoperative treatment may reduce healthcare costs and risks associated with surgery and should be considered for displaced adolescent proximal humerus fractures, irrespective of fracture displacement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Evaluating the association of radiographic parameters of proximal humerus fractures managed conservatively with functional outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of proximal humerus fractures remains controversial. Understanding the factors that can affect the long-term functional outcomes can aid with management choices. This primary aim of this paper is to evaluate the association of radiographic parameters with functional outcomes. METHODS: Radiographic parameters [Caput-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angles, Y-scapular angles, and humeral head height (HHH)] were studied. The patients were split into varus and valgus groups based on the CCD angles and retroverted and anteverted groups based on Y-scapular angles. Functional outcome was measured by Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Constant Shoulder Score (CSS), and quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score at 1 year follow-up. Intra- and interrater reliability were measured with the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis and logistic regression analysis defined the optimal value for abnormalities on radiographic evaluation as an outcome predictor. RESULTS: 111 patients were recruited (mean age 69, 78% female). Median final radiographic assessment was at 7 months. Mean initial/final CCD was 119o /111o (varus, n = 36) and 153o/140o (valgus, n = 75). Mean initial/final Y-scapula angle was 27o/27o (retroversion, n = 101) and 70o/40o (anteversion, n = 9). There was a significant relationship between OSS and final Y-scapular angle in the retroverted group (adj coeff 0.034, p = 0.009) with optimum predictive retroversion angulation of 25o predicting poor functional outcome (OSS < 40), area under the ROC curve of 0.614. Higher initial valgus and retroversion significantly predicted more change in the final angle (adj coeff - 0.349, p = 0.002, adj coeff - 0.527, p < 0.001 respectively). Both intra-rater and inter-rater reliability for the radiographic parameters were excellent (ICC > 0.9). CONCLUSION: Radiographic parameters whilst having excellent reliability, have a limited ability to predict short-term functional recovery. The extent of retroversion is the most important predictor for functional recovery with 25o a cut-off guide. Fractures with a higher initial valgus and retroversion tend to displace more.

Clinical and radiological outcome following trauma-related reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a frequently used therapy for complex proximal humeral fractures and posttraumatic disorders. The present study's purpose was to assess the clinical and radiological outcome of primary and secondary RSA, and to analyze the impact of refixation of the greater tuberosity (GT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 28 patients with primary fracture RSA and 18 patients with RSA due to posttraumatic disorders were examined with a mean clinical follow-up of 2.5 ± 1.73 years. Operative details and radiographs were retrospectively reviewed. Additional analyses were performed for healed and non-healed GT in primary RSA. RESULTS: Patients with fracture RSA had higher Constant-Murley score (CMS) than secondary RSA without reaching significance (p = 0.104). No significant difference was present for the quality of life measured by the Short Form 36 (SF 36) and the range of motion. In primary RSA, 78.6% GT healed anatomically. Compared to non-healed GT, patients with healed GT had a significantly higher CMS (p = 0.011), external rotation (p = 0.026) and forward flexion (p = 0.083), whereas DASH score was lower without a significant difference (p = 0.268). SF 36 showed no significant difference. Patients with healed GT had a more neutral glenoid version (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Superior range of motion and clinical outcome scores were present for anatomically healed GT. Therefore, refixation of the tuberosities is recommended. Secondary RSA can result in inferior results compared to primary RSA, so patients need to be adequately informed.

Stress shielding: short-term radiological results of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty with an anatomic proximal coated stem in proximal humeral fractures.

PURPOSE: This study aims to determine the stress shielding and other radiological outcomes of patients who underwent an uncemented reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with an anatomic proximal coated stem for complex proximal humeral fractures (PHF) with 3 or 4 parts at 2 years postoperatively. METHODS: 37 shoulders underwent an uncemented RSA for PHF from November 2015 to February 2019 and were followed up for 2 years. A radiographic assessment of stress shielding, filling ratio, stem stability (radiolucent lines/subsidence/alignment), tuberosity healing and notch was performed. RESULTS: The mean age at the time of surgery was 72 years (range, 61-85). Stress shielding was appreciated in 31 shoulders (83.8%). The most important characteristic of stress shielding is cortical resorption: Grade 3 resorption occurred in 3 shoulders (8.1%) and grade 4 in 23 (62.2%) as per the grading system defined by Inoue et al. (Inoue et al. in J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:1984-1989, 2017). A high occurrence of bone resorption was observed in Gruen zones 2 (Lateral Stress shielding) and 7 (Medial Stress shielding). The mean distal filling ratio in patients without stress shielding was 78,48(SD 14,9), whereas in patients with stress shielding, it was slightly higher with a mean of 81,68% (SD 4,89). Tuberosity healing was found in 94.6% (35/37) of the shoulders. No patient had any radiolucent line. No notch was observed. CONCLUSION: At short-term follow-up, a high rate of tuberosity healing was achieved (94.6%) even though stress shielding was found in 83.8% (31/37) of the shoulders. Bone resorption was most frequently observed externally at zone 2 (Lateral stress shielding) and internally at zone 7 (Medial stress shielding). A higher filling ratio was associated with an increased occurrence of stress shielding. The uncemented anatomic humeral component did not result in early loosening. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; Case Series; Treatment study.

Proximal humeral fractures: association between displacement and fatty degeneration of the supraspinatus muscle.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the relationship between initial displacement in proximal humeral fractures and fatty degeneration of the rotator cuff measured by CT according to the Goutallier classification. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study evaluated patients with proximal humeral fractures over a six-month period. The study included patients ≥ 18 years old with complete radiological views (anteroposterior, lateral, and Grashey) and a CT scan of the affected shoulder; previous fracture or ipsilateral shoulder surgery were excluded. Neer's classification system and Goutallier stages were used to evaluate the patients. Demographic data were collected and, two groups were analysed according to age (≤ 50 years and > 50 years). RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were included (m = 36, f = 26, ratio 1.3:1); seven patients were excluded. Male patients (36, 58.1%), patients older than 50 years (33, 53.2%) and a low-energy injury mechanism (36, 58.1%) were the most frequent cases. According to the Neer system, the most common proximal humerus fracture was fracture-dislocation in 17 (27.4%) cases. The most common stage in Goutallier's classification was I (some fatty streaks) in 22 (35.4%) cases. Younger patients (≤ 50 years) had more displaced fractures with low fatty degeneration (p = < 0.001) than older patients (> 50 years), who had minimally displaced fractures with greater fatty degeneration (p = 0.567). CONCLUSIONS: High-energy mechanisms are associated with younger patients and a more displaced fracture according to the Neer classification. Older patients had a more advanced Goutallier stage and lesser displaced fracture. We should consider a more aggressive approach in the treatment of non-displaced fractures in elderly patients, less conservative and more surgical management, to obtain a better clinical evolution after the treatment of these kinds of fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Endosteal strut using a hydroxyapatite/poly-L-lactide mesh tube with a proximal humeral locking plate for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures.

PURPOSE: Proximal humeral fractures cause large intramedullary bone defects after humeral-head reduction. Hydroxyapatite/poly-L-lactide (HA/PLLA) materials are widely used for various fractures. However, the efficacy of endosteal strut using a HA/PLLA mesh tube (ES-HA/PLLA) with a locking plate for treating proximal humeral fractures was not reported. The purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy of ES-HA/PLLA with a proximal humeral locking plate in proximal humeral fractures. METHODS: Seventeen patients with proximal humeral fractures treated using ES-HA/PLLA with a locking plate from November 2017 to November 2021 were evaluated. The range of motion of the shoulder and postoperative complications were assessed at the final follow-up. Radiographs were evaluated to assess bone union and loss of reduction by measuring humeral-head height (HHH) and humeral neck-shaft angle (NSA). RESULTS: The average flexion and external rotation of the shoulder at the final follow-up were 137° (range, 90-180°) and 39° (range, - 10 to 60°), respectively. All fractures were united. The average HHH and NSA just after the surgery and final follow-up were 12.5 mm and 11.6 mm and 129.9° and 127.4°, respectively. Two patients presented screw perforation of the humeral head. One patient underwent implant removal due to infection. Avascular necrosis of the humeral head was observed in one patient with arthritis mutilans. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ES-HA/PLLA with a proximal humeral locking plate resulted in bone union in all patients and prevented postoperative loss of reduction. ES-HA/PLLA is one of the treatment options for proximal humeral fractures.

Quality of life, functional and radiological outcomes of treatment of three-part and four-part proximal humerus fractures with locking plates and comparison in young versus older than 70 years: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Verify if the use of locking plates in displaced three- and four-part proximal humerus fractures has meant an improvement even in patients over 70 years of age. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed surgery with locking plate fixation in 56 consecutive patients with three- and four-part proximal humerus fractures according to Neer's classification between 1/1/15 and 12/31/20 at our Hospital. Patient satisfaction, quality of life, functionality and radiological variables, as well as the comparison between patients older and younger than 70 years were the main outcomes. Likewise, factors and complications that may have influenced these variables were analyzed as secondary outcomes. The analysis of all these variables was performed after a minimum follow-up time of 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: 51 patients (92%) ended up satisfied or very satisfied according to the SF-36 test and with no disability or mild disability according to the DASH Score questionnaire. 46 patients (82%) obtained a satisfactory or excellent result according to the Neer scale modified by Cofield and 38 (68%) a good or excellent function according to the Constant Murley questionnaire. In 47 cases (84%) good radiological alignment was observed. Complications occurred in 20 patients (36%). The complications and the results of the SF-36, DASH Score, Neer scale modified by Cofield and Constant Murley tests depended on the radiological alignment (p = 0.009, p = 0.006, p = 0.025, p = 0.0008 and p = 0.0004). There were 37 patients younger than 70 years and 19 older than 70 years with no statistically significant differences when comparing the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that satisfactory results can be obtained with osteosynthesis with locking plates in displaced proximal humerus fractures even in patients older than 70 years of age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: Retrospective Cohort, Treatment Study.

A prognostic classification of proximal humerus fractures: the cephalic extension staging.

PURPOSE: Recent publications emphasized the role of dorsomedial metaphyseal extension of humeral head as predictor of ischemia after complex proximal humerus fractures (PHFs). We evaluated on preoperative 3D CT scan of PHFs the surface of this metaphyseal extension and its prognostic value on the occurrence of avascular necrosis (AVN). METHODS: We followed a series of 25 fixations of complex PHF which had a preoperative 3D CT scan and measured the surface area of the posterior metaphyseal extension (PME) of the head. Using approximations, we calculated the ratio between the PME surface area (PMS) and the articular surface area of the head (HS). The PMS/HS ratio was analyzed against the risk of AVN. RESULTS: The measurement of the PMS/HS ratio emphasizes the significance of PME. The incidence of AVN is correlated with the magnitude of PME. Therefore, we include the PME as a fifth element in the characterization of complex PHFs and we propose a 4-stage prognostic classification based on the number of extensions of the humeral head. The head may have 3 extensions: posteromedial (PME), lesser tuberosity (LTE) and greater tuberosity (GTE). The risk of AVN decreases with the number of extensions of the head. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates a correlation between the occurrence of AVN and the size of PME in complex PHF cases. We propose a four-stage classification system to facilitate treatment decision-making between fixation and prosthesis.

Comparison between arthroscopic suture anchor fixation and open plate fixation in the greater tuberosity fracture of the proximal humerus.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation (OR/IF) using a plate or patients undergoing an arthroscopic suture anchor fixation for the greater tuberosity (GT) fracture of the proximal humerus. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing OR/IF or an arthroscopic suture anchor fixation for the GT fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January, 2010 and December, 2020, 122 patients with GT fracture underwent operative fixation. Either OR/IF using proximal humeral locking plate (50 patients) or arthroscopic suture anchor (72 patients) fixation was performed. Fourteen patients were lost to follow-up and finally, 108 patients were enrolled in this study. We divided these patients into two groups: (1) OR/IF group (Group I: 44 patients) and arthroscopic anchor fixation group (Group II: 64 patients). The primary outcome was subjective shoulder function (shoulder functional scale). Secondary outcomes were range of motion, and complications including GT fixation failure, fracture migration, or neurologic complication. Also, age, sex, BMI, operation time, shoulder dislocation, fracture comminution, AP (anteroposterior), SI (superoinferior) size and displacement were evaluated and compared between two groups. RESULTS: Both groups showed satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes at mid-term follow-up. Between 2 groups, there were no significant differences in age, sex, BMI, presence of shoulder dislocation or comminution. Group II showed higher clinical scores except VAS score (p < 0.05) and longer surgical times (95.3 vs. 61.5 min). Largest fracture displacement (Group I vs. II: SI displacement: 40 vs. 13 mm, and AP displacement: 49 vs. 11 mm) and higher complication rate (p = 0.049) was found in Group I. CONCLUSIONS: Both arthroscopic anchor fixation and open plate fixation methods showed satisfactory outcomes at mid-term follow-up. Among them, OR/IF is preferred for larger fracture displacement (> 5 mm) and shorter operation time However, arthroscopic anchor fixation group showed better clinical outcomes and less complications than the OR/IF group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4, Case series with subgroup analysis.