Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 244
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Br J Haematol ; 193(1): 93-100, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33118614

ABSTRACT

Although new multiple myeloma (MM) therapies are effective in alleviating some disease-associated symptoms (e.g. bone pain, fatigue, functional decline), they can result in additional toxicities, further impacting health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Here, we compared HRQoL and safety of lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone [RVd (n = 445)], bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone [VMP (n = 77)] and Vd or VMP (n = 588) in patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) from the Connect® MM Registry, a large, USA, multicentre, prospective observational cohort study. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Multiple Myeloma subscale, EuroQol-5D overall score and Bone Pain Inventory HRQoL scores were significantly improved with RVd versus Vd/VMP. Serious adverse event rates were similar in all groups. Treatment with RVd maintained HRQoL in this real-world, largely community-based population of patients with NDMM.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/psychology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bortezomib/adverse effects , Bortezomib/therapeutic use , Case-Control Studies , Dexamethasone/adverse effects , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Lenalidomide/adverse effects , Lenalidomide/therapeutic use , Male , Melphalan/adverse effects , Melphalan/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Prednisone/adverse effects , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life/psychology , Registries , Safety , Stem Cell Transplantation/standards
4.
Eur Spine J ; 28(8): 1837-1845, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31098715

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In preclinical studies, many stem cell/cellular interventions demonstrated robust regeneration and/or repair in case of SCI and were considered a promising therapeutic candidate. However, data from clinical studies are not robust. Despite lack of substantial evidence for the efficacy of these interventions in spinal cord injury (SCI), many clinics around the world offer them as "therapy." These "clinics" claim efficacy through patient testimonials and self-advertisement without any scientific evidence to validate their claims. Thus, SCS established a panel of experts to review published preclinical studies, clinical studies and current global guidelines/regulations on usage of cellular transplants and make recommendations for their clinical use. METHODS: The literature review and draft position statement was compiled and circulated among the panel and relevant suggestions incorporated to reach consensus. This was discussed and finalized in an open forum during the SCS Annual Meeting, ISSICON. RESULTS: Preclinical evidence suggests safety and clinical potency of cellular interventions after SCI. However, evidence from clinical studies consisted of mostly case reports or uncontrolled case series/studies. Data from animal studies cannot be generalized to human SCI with regard to toxicity prediction after auto/allograft transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, cellular/stem cell transplantation for human SCI is experimental and needs to be tested through a valid clinical trial program. It is not ethical to provide unproven transplantation as therapy with commercial implications. To stop the malpractice of marketing such "unproven therapies" to a vulnerable population, it is crucial that all countries unite to form common, well-defined regulations/legislation on their use in SCI. These slides can be retrieved from Electronic Supplementary Material.


Subject(s)
Spinal Cord Injuries/surgery , Stem Cell Transplantation , Animals , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Stem Cell Transplantation/legislation & jurisprudence , Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Stem Cell Transplantation/standards
5.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 161(10): 2059-2064, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31273445

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While multiple trials have employed stereotactic stem cell transplantation, injection techniques have received little critical attention. Precise cell delivery is critical for certain applications, particularly when targeting deep nuclei. METHODS: Ten patients with a history of ischemic stroke underwent CT-guided stem cell transplantation. Cells were delivered along 3 tracts adjacent to the infarcted area. Intraoperative air deposits and postoperative T2-weighted MRI fluid signals were mapped in relation to calculated targets. RESULTS: The deepest air deposit was found 4.5 ± 1.0 mm (mean ± 2 SEM) from target. The apex of the T2-hyperintense tract was found 2.8 ± 0.8 mm from target. On average, air pockets were found anterior (1.2 ± 1.1 mm, p = 0.04) and superior (2.4 ± 1.0 mm, p < 0.001) to the target; no directional bias was noted for the apex of the T2-hyperintense tract. Location and distribution of air deposits were variable and were affected by the relationship of cannula trajectory to stroke cavity. CONCLUSIONS: Precise stereotactic cell transplantation is a little-studied technical challenge. Reflux of cell suspension and air, and the structure of the injection tract affect delivery of cell suspensions. Intraoperative CT allows assessment of delivery and potential trajectory correction.


Subject(s)
Basal Ganglia/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Neuronavigation/methods , Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Basal Ganglia/surgery , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Neuronavigation/adverse effects , Neuronavigation/standards , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Stem Cell Transplantation/standards
6.
J Cell Physiol ; 233(10): 6317-6328, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29319169

ABSTRACT

Adipose tissue is an important source of adipose derived stem cells (ADSCs). These cells have the potential of being used for certain therapies, in which the main objective is to recover the function of a tissue/organ affected by a disease. In order to contribute to repair of the tissue, these cells should be able to survive and carry out their functions in unfavorable conditions after being transplanted. This process requires a better understanding of the biology involved: such as the time cells remain in the implant site, how long they stay there, and whether or not they differentiate into host tissue cells. This report focuses on these questions. ADSC were injected into three different tissues (substantia nigra, ventricle, liver) and they were tracked in vivo with a dual GFP-Luc reporter system. The results show that ADSCs were able to survive up to 4 months after the engraftment and some of them started showing resident cell tissue phenotype. These results demonstrate their long-term capacity of survival and differentiation when injected in vivo.


Subject(s)
Cell Survival/physiology , Cell Tracking/standards , Stem Cell Transplantation/standards , Stem Cells/cytology , Adipocytes/cytology , Adipose Tissue/cytology , Animals , Cell Differentiation/physiology , Cell Proliferation/physiology , Humans , Liver/physiology , Liver/surgery , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Stem Cells/physiology , Substantia Nigra/physiology , Substantia Nigra/surgery , Ventricular Function/physiology
7.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 24(5): 909-913, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29360515

ABSTRACT

Choosing Wisely encourages dialogue about reducing unnecessary procedures, tests, or treatments in healthcare. The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (ASBMT) and Canadian Blood and Marrow Transplant Group (CBMTG) established a Choosing Wisely BMT Task Force whose objective was to create a list of top 5 practices in blood and marrow transplantation to be questioned. The Task Force consisted of representatives from ASBMT's Quality Outcomes, Education, and Practice Guidelines committees; ASBMT's Pharmacy Special Interest Group; CBMTG Program Directors; and Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). Suggestions for current transplantation practices to question were elicited from the CBMTG Program Directors; members of ASBMT's Quality Outcomes, Practice Guidelines, and Education committees; and chairs of the CIBMTR scientific working committees. We received 119 unique suggestions that were ranked based on their potential impact on harm reduction, cost reduction, necessity of the test or practice, and the strength of available evidence. Through a modified Delphi process, suggestions were narrowed down to 6, which were then subjected to systematic reviews. The final 5 recommendations focus on graft source for patients with aplastic anemia, corticosteroid dose for initial treatment of graft-versus-host-disease, optimal number of umbilical cord blood units for transplantation, graft source in matched unrelated donor transplantation, and use of prophylactic intravenous immunoglobulin in transplant recipients. These Choosing Wisely BMT recommendations are relevant to the current clinical practice of blood and marrow transplantation and focus on tests, treatments, or procedures that may be harmful, wasteful, or for which there is no apparent clinical benefit.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Transplantation/standards , Stem Cell Transplantation/standards , Advisory Committees , Bone Marrow Transplantation/methods , Canada , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Humans , Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Therapeutics/economics , Therapeutics/standards , United States
8.
Cytotherapy ; 20(9): 1103-1109, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30131270

ABSTRACT

We report on a roundtable event hosted in Singapore that sought to identify some of the ethical and regulatory challenges in translating autologous cell-based interventions, particularly those claiming to involve stem cells, into safe and effective therapies and to propose some solutions to encourage responsible innovation with these products. Challenges are identified in the three areas of cell manufacturing and processing, innovative uses of autologous cells in clinical practice and standards of evidence. Proposed solutions are discussed within a co-operative model of statutory laws and regulations that can enable product development with autologous cells and professional codes and standards that can encourage ethical conduct in clinical practice. Future research should be directed toward establishing regional networks for the development of internationally consistent standards in manufacturing and ethical codes of conduct for innovating with stem cells, and other autologous cells, and fostering ongoing exchange between jurisdictions.


Subject(s)
Autografts , Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Translational Research, Biomedical , Australia , Autografts/standards , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Japan , Manufacturing Industry , Singapore , Stem Cell Transplantation/standards , Stem Cells
9.
Perspect Biol Med ; 61(1): 7-24, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29805145

ABSTRACT

Hundreds of businesses and clinics in the United States are engaged in direct-to-consumer marketing of unproven and unlicensed stem cell-based interventions. This essay provides an overview of this marketplace, examines advertising techniques companies use to draw clients and legitimate marketing claims, and summarizes the roles the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other agencies are supposed to play in regulating the direct-to-consumer marketplace for stem cell interventions. The essay also reviews federal regulations, describes how many businesses selling purported "stem cell treatments" appear to violate these standards, and considers ethical issues and harms associated with widespread promotion of unapproved stem cell products.


Subject(s)
Marketing of Health Services/methods , Stem Cell Transplantation/legislation & jurisprudence , Transplantation, Autologous/legislation & jurisprudence , Federal Government , Humans , Social Media , Stem Cell Transplantation/ethics , Stem Cell Transplantation/standards , Transplantation, Autologous/ethics , Transplantation, Autologous/standards , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
10.
EMBO J ; 32(11): 1489-95, 2013 May 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23644381

ABSTRACT

At the time of writing, the Italian Parliament is debating a new law that would make it legal to practice an unproven stem cell treatment in public hospitals. The treatment, offered by a private non-medical organization, may not be safe, lacks a rationale, and violates current national laws and European regulations. This case raises multiple concerns, most prominently the urgent need to protect patients who are severely ill, exposed to significant risks, and vulnerable to exploitation. The scientific community must consider the context-social, financial, medical, legal-in which stem cell science is currently situated and the need for stringent regulation. Additional concerns are emerging. These emanate from the novel climate, created within science itself, and stem cell science in particular, by the currently prevailing model of 'translational medicine'. Only rigorous science and rigorous regulation can ensure translation of science into effective therapies rather than into ineffective market products, and mark, at the same time, the sharp distinction between the striving for new therapies and the deceit of patients.


Subject(s)
Stem Cell Transplantation/legislation & jurisprudence , Europe , Humans , Italy , Patient Safety , Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Stem Cell Transplantation/standards , Stem Cells , Translational Research, Biomedical
11.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 15(2): 230-269, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28188192

ABSTRACT

Multiple myeloma (MM) is caused by the neoplastic proliferation of plasma cells. These neoplastic plasma cells proliferate and produce monoclonal immunoglobulin in the bone marrow causing skeletal damage, a hallmark of multiple myeloma. Other MM-related complications include hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, and infections. The NCCN Multiple Myeloma Panel members have developed guidelines for the management of patients with various plasma cell dyscrasias, including solitary plasmacytoma, smoldering myeloma, multiple myeloma, systemic light chain amyloidosis, and Waldenström's macroglobulinemia. The recommendations specific to the diagnosis and treatment of patients with newly diagnosed MM are discussed in this article.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Medical Oncology/standards , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Antineoplastic Agents/supply & distribution , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/standards , Asymptomatic Diseases , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/standards , Humans , Immunoglobulins/blood , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Maintenance Chemotherapy/methods , Maintenance Chemotherapy/standards , Multiple Myeloma/blood , Myeloma Proteins/analysis , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/standards , Serologic Tests , Standard of Care , Stem Cell Transplantation/standards , Treatment Outcome
14.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 138(4): 1152-1160, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27241891

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens are increasingly being used in the transplantation of patients with primary immunodeficiency disorders (PIDs), but there are no large studies looking at long-term lineage-specific chimerism. OBJECTIVES: We sought to analyze long-term chimerism and event-free survival in children undergoing transplantation for PIDs using RIC with fludarabine and melphalan (Flu/Melph) and to study the effect of donor type and stem cell source. METHODS: One hundred forty-two children underwent transplantation with RIC by using Flu/Melph and for PIDs by using bone marrow (n = 93) or peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs; n = 49). Donors were matched unrelated donors (n = 72), mismatched unrelated donors (n = 37), matched sibling donors (n = 14), matched family donors (n = 12), and mismatched family donors (n = 7). RESULTS: Overall survival at a median follow-up of 7.5 years was 78%, irrespective of stem cell source or donor type. When bone marrow was used as the stem cell source, 26% of patients ended up with very low levels of donor chimerism (<10% donor), especially in the myeloid lineage. Event-free survival in this group was significantly lower compared with that in the rest of the group (25% vs 70%, P < .001). With the use of PBSCs, more than 90% of patients achieved complete donor chimerism or high-level mixed chimerism (>50% donor chimerism) in all lineages. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of our experience, we would suggest that PBSCs should be the stem cell source of choice in children with PIDs undergoing transplantation with Flu/Melph RIC from a matched donor source. This is most likely to ensure sustained high-level donor chimerism.


Subject(s)
Chimerism , Disease-Free Survival , Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes/therapy , Melphalan/therapeutic use , Stem Cell Transplantation/standards , Stem Cells/cytology , Vidarabine/analogs & derivatives , Cell Lineage , Drug Therapy, Combination , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes/drug therapy , Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes/mortality , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Vidarabine/therapeutic use
15.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 22(11): 1926-1937, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27288955

ABSTRACT

Consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard of care for transplantation-eligible patients with multiple myeloma, based on randomized trials showing improved progression-free survival with autologous transplantation after combination chemotherapy induction. These trials were performed before novel agents were introduced; subsequently, combinations of immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors as induction therapy have significantly improved rates and depth of response. Ongoing randomized trials are testing whether conventional autologous transplantation continues to improve responses after novel agent induction. Although these results are awaited, it is important to review strategies for improving outcomes after ASCT. Conditioning before ASCT with higher doses of melphalan and combinations of melphalan with other agents, including radiopharmaceuticals, has been explored. Tandem ASCT, consolidation, and maintenance therapy after ASCT have been investigated in phase III trials. Experimental cellular therapies using ex vivo-primed dendritic cells, ex vivo-expanded autologous lymphocytes, Killer Immunoglobulin Receptor (KIR)-mismatched allogeneic natural killer cells, and genetically modified T cells to augment ASCT are also in phase I trials. This review summarizes these strategies and highlights the importance of exploring strategies to augment ASCT, even in the era of novel agent induction.


Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Transplantation, Autologous/methods , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Humans , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/methods , Stem Cell Transplantation/standards , Stem Cell Transplantation/trends , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Transplantation, Autologous/standards , Treatment Outcome
16.
Soc Stud Sci ; 46(1): 112-39, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26983174

ABSTRACT

The article explores the formation of an international politics of resistance and 'alterstandardization' in regenerative stem cell medicine. The absence of internationally harmonized regulatory frameworks in the clinical stem cell field and the presence of lucrative business opportunities have resulted in the formation of transnational networks adopting alternative research standards and practices. These oppose, as a universal global standard, strict evidence-based medicine clinical research protocols as defined by scientists and regulatory agencies in highly developed countries. The emergence of transnational spaces of alter-standardization is closely linked to scientific advances in rapidly developing countries such as China and India, but calls for more flexible regulatory frameworks, and the legitimization of experimental for-profit applications outside of evidence-based medical care, are emerging increasingly also within more stringently regulated countries, such as the United States and countries in the European Union. We can observe, then, a trend toward the pluralization of the standards, practices, and concepts in the stem cell field.


Subject(s)
Developed Countries , Developing Countries , Regenerative Medicine/standards , Stem Cell Research , Stem Cell Transplantation/standards , Government Regulation , Politics
17.
Circ Res ; 113(1): 20-1, 2013 Jun 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23788504

ABSTRACT

In his 2000 best-selling novel, Dan Brown tells the fictional story of an apparent plot by the Illuminati, the self-proclaimed "enlightened ones," against the Vatican. Apparently life truly does sometimes imitate art.


Subject(s)
Deception , Patient Safety/standards , Stem Cell Transplantation/ethics , Stem Cell Transplantation/standards , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL