Fast-track thrombolysis protocol for acute limb ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: Catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of acute lower extremity arterial occlusions often requires several interventional sessions to generate successful outcomes. It is typically an expensive procedure, necessitating extended hospital length of stay (LOS) that may be associated with an increase in both local and systemic hemorrhagic complications. Five years ago, we created the fast-track thrombolysis protocol for arteries (FTTP-A) to deal with these concerns. The goal of our protocol is to re-establish patency during the first session of thrombolysis, thus decreasing costs and complications associated with prolonged periods of thrombolytic exposure. METHODS: A retrospective study of 42 patients who were treated for acute limb ischemia at our institution by FTTP-A from January 2014 to February 2019 was performed. FTTP-A includes periadventitial lidocaine injection at the arterial puncture site under ultrasound guidance, contrast arteriography of the entire targeted segment, pharmacomechanical rheolytic thrombectomy of the occluded arterial segment, tissue plasminogen activator infusion along the occluded segment, balloon maceration of the thrombus, and (if deemed necessary) placement of a stent in an area of significant (≥30%) stenosis that is refractory to balloon angioplasty and thrombolysis. After the stenosis or thrombus is cleared, patients are prescribed an oral anticoagulant agent. RESULTS: Primary FTTP-A (50 total interventions) was performed in 42 patients. The median age of patients was 67.2 ± 12.2 years (range, 41-98 years), and 54.8% were male; 59.5% of the procedures were performed on the left lower extremity. Initial arterial access was obtained through the common femoral artery in 39 of 42 cases (92.9%); in the remaining 3 cases, it was obtained in a left bypass access site, a right femoral-popliteal graft, and a right femoral-femoral graft. The mean operative time was 148.9 ± 62.9 minutes (range, 83-313 minutes), and the mean volume of tissue plasminogen activator infused was 9.7 ± 4.0 mg (range, 2-20 mg). The median cost including medications and interventional tools was $4673.19 per procedure. The mean postoperative LOS was 3.1 ± 4.5 days (range, 1-25 days). Median postoperative LOS was 1 day. Mean postoperative follow-up was 27 ± 19.2 months (range, 0-62 months). Single-session FTTP-A was successful in 81% (n = 34/42) of patients; the remaining 8 patients (19%) required a single additional session. Of the 42 patients, 34 (81%) required arterial stenting. Periprocedural complications consisted of one patient with hematuria, which resolved, and one patient with thrombocytopenia, which resolved. No patients experienced rethrombosis within 30 days of FTTP-A. During the 5-year study period, there was no significant local or systemic hemorrhage, limb loss, or mortality related to this protocol. CONCLUSIONS: FTTP-A appears to be a safe, efficacious, and cost-effective procedure in the resolution of acute lower extremity arterial occlusions.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of low-dose direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for the prevention of cancer-associated thrombosis in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that low-dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including rivaroxaban and apixaban, may help reduce the incidence of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). METHODS: A cost-utility analysis was performed from the health sector perspective using a Markov state-transition model in patients with cancer who are at intermediate-to-high risk for VTE. Transition probability, relative risk, cost, and utility inputs were obtained from a meta-analysis of the RCTs and relevant epidemiology studies. Differences in cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per patient were calculated over a lifetime horizon. One-way, probabilistic, and scenario sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: In patients with cancer at intermediate-to-high risk for VTE, treatment with low-dose DOAC thromboprophylaxis for 6 months, compared with placebo, was associated with 32 per 1000 fewer VTE and 11 per 1000 more major bleeding episodes over a lifetime. The incremental cost and QALY increases were $1445 and 0.12, respectively, with an ICER of $11,947 per QALY gained. Key drivers of ICER variations included the relative risks of VTE and bleeding as well as drug cost. This strategy was 94% cost effective at the threshold of $50,000 per QALY. The selection of patients with Khorana scores ≥3 yielded the greatest value, with an ICER of $5794 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose DOAC thromboprophylaxis for 6 months appears to be cost-effective in patients with cancer who are at intermediate-to-high risk for VTE. The implementation of this strategy in patients with Khorana scores ≥3 may lead to the highest cost-benefit ratio.

Clinical and Economic Benefits of Stent Grafts in Dysfunctional and Thrombosed Hemodialysis Access Graft Circuits in the REVISE Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare reinterventions and associated costs to maintain arteriovenous graft hemodialysis access circuits after rescue with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), with or without concurrent Viabahn stent grafts, over 24 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter (n = 30 sites) study evaluated reintervention number, type, and cost in 269 patients randomized to undergo placement of stent grafts or PTA alone. Outcomes were 24-month average cumulative number of reinterventions, associated costs, and total costs for all patients and in 4 groups based on index treatment and clinical presentation (thrombosed or dysfunctional). RESULTS: Over 24 months, the patients in the stent graft arm had a 27% significant reduction in the average number of reinterventions within the circuit compared to the PTA arm (3.7 stent graft vs 5.1 PTA; P = .005) and similar total costs ($27,483 vs $28,664; P = .49). In thrombosed grafts, stent grafts significantly reduced the number of reinterventions (3.7 stent graft vs 6.2 PTA; P = .022) and had significantly lower total costs compared to the PTA arm ($30,329 vs $37,206; P = .027). In dysfunctional grafts, no statistical difference was observed in the number of reinterventions or total costs (3.7 stent graft vs 4.4 PTA; P = .12, and $25,421 stent graft and $22,610 PTA; P = .14). CONCLUSIONS: Over 24 months, the use of stent grafts significantly reduced the number of reinterventions for all patients, driven by patients presenting with thrombosed grafts. Compared to PTA, stent grafts reduced overall treatment costs for patients presenting with thrombosed grafts and had similar costs for stenotic grafts.

Cost-effectiveness of edoxaban versus dalteparin for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis.

Malignancy is a well-established risk factor for venous thromboembolism and while low-molecular-weight heparin therapy has been standard of care for cancer-associated thrombosis for many years, many patients find injection therapy burdensome. The direct oral anticoagulant edoxaban has been shown to be noninferior to dalteparin for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis. In a Markov simulation model, edoxaban with 6-month time horizon and a United States societal perspective with 2017 US dollars, edoxaban was the preferred strategy in the general cancer population (6-month cost $6061 with 0.34 quality adjusted life years) and in a subgroup of patients with gastrointestinal malignancy (6-month cost $7227 with 0.34 quality adjusted life years). The incremental cost effectiveness ratio of dalteparin compared to edoxaban was $1,873,535 in the general oncology population and $694,058 in the gastrointestinal malignancy population.

Cost analysis of the Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) Graft compared to the tunneled dialysis catheter.

BACKGROUND: In end-stage renal disease patients with central venous obstruction, who have limited vascular access options, the Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) Graft is a new alternative with a lower incidence of complications and longer effective device life compared to tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs). We undertook an economic analysis of introducing the HeRO Graft in the UK. METHODS: A 1-year cost-consequence decision analytic model was developed comparing management with the HeRO Graft to TDCs from the perspective of the National Health Service in England. The model comprises four 3-month cycles during which the vascular access option either remains functional for hemodialysis or fails, patients can experience access-related infection and device thrombosis, and they can also accrue associated costs. Clinical input data were sourced from published studies and unit cost data from National Health Service 2014-15 Reference Costs. RESULTS: In the base case, a 100-patient cohort managed with the HeRO Graft experienced 6 fewer failed devices, 53 fewer access-related infections, and 67 fewer device thromboses compared to patients managed with TDCs. Although the initial device and placement costs for the HeRO Graft are greater than those for TDCs, savings from the lower incidence of device complications and longer effective device patency reduces these costs. Overall net annual costs are £2600 for each HeRO Graft-managed patient compared to TDC-managed patients. If the National Health Service were to reimburse hemodialysis at a uniform rate regardless of the type of vascular access, net 1-year savings of £1200 per patient are estimated for individuals managed with the HeRO Graft. CONCLUSIONS: The base case results showed a marginal net positive cost associated with vascular access with the HeRO Graft compared with TDCs for the incremental clinical benefit of reductions in patency failures, device-related thrombosis, and access-related infection events in a patient population with limited options for dialysis vascular access.

Intraprocedural thrombotic events: What's the real cost?

Intraprocedural thrombotic events (IPTE) during PCI occur in 4% of patients with NSTEACS and 12% of STEACS. IPTE increases hospital cost by $3,592. With an incidence of 4%, additional therapy to completely prevent IPTE in 100 patients would need to cost $144 to make it cost neutral. Further studies are necessary to determine cost-benefit of therapies to prevent IPTE such as cangrelor or newer P2Y12 inhibitors with more rapid onset.

Cost implications of intraprocedural thrombotic events during PCI.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to estimate the direct costs (in-hospital and 30-day) associated with an intraprocedural thrombotic event (IPTE) among patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Patients with IPTE have higher rates of in-hospital and 30-day major adverse cardiac events than patients without IPTE. The extent to which IPTE also add to medical costs is unknown. METHODS: Hospital costs for patients in the ACUITY Trial were compared between patients with and without IPTE. Adjusted comparisons were performed using generalized linear models (GLMs). All costs are reported in 2012 US dollars. RESULTS: A total of 1,307 patients with both core laboratory-based angiographic assessment and detailed economic data were included in the final study population. IPTE occurred in 52 patients (4.0%). Median in-hospital costs were higher in patients with IPTE than in those without IPTE ($23,719 vs. $18,419, P = 0.01). Thirty-day median costs were also higher for IPTE patients ($23,719 vs. $19,556, P = 0.05). After adjusting for baseline differences, IPTE was associated with 19.5% (95% CI: [2.8-38.8%], P = 0.02) and 18.9% (95% CI: [1.2-39.7%], P = 0.04) increases in in-hospital and 30-day costs, respectively. These relative differences represent median increases of $3,592 in initial hospital costs and $3,696 in 30-day costs. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of IPTE during the index PCI in patients with NSTEACS is associated with substantial increases in-hospital and 30-day costs. These findings suggest that strategies to prevent IPTE may be associated with important cost offsets as well as improved clinical outcomes.

Thrombophilia testing in a tertiary paediatric hospital: Indications, outcomes and appropriateness.

AIM: The association between inherited thrombophilia and thrombotic disease in children is unclear. As a result, whether expensive thrombophilia tests are indicated in children is a contentious issue. This retrospective study aimed to assess the appropriateness of thrombophilia testing and the associated cost of inappropriate testing at a tertiary paediatric hospital. METHODS: We conducted a search for thrombophilia tests ordered at the Royal Children's Hospital between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2013. Using pathology and clinical records, we collected data relating to demographics, clinical data, indications, requesting departments and impact on patient management. RESULTS: Over the 3-year period, 3867 tests were ordered for 613 patients costing the hospital $102 579. Tests were most commonly ordered by gastroenterology on patients receiving liver transplants, by neurology as part of the stroke protocol, and by cardiology and cardiac surgery for patients anticoagulated on heparin infusions. Testing for thrombosis-related indications was relatively uncommon. Thrombophilia testing only directly affected management in one-third of patients. Overall, 70% of thrombophilia tests ordered were considered appropriate. However, some departments were found to have rates of inappropriate testing in excess of 50%. CONCLUSION: With improvements in thrombophilia testing practices at the Royal Children's Hospital AU$29 645.40 could be saved over 3 years. While there are improvements to be made in this area, in the overall context of the hospital's pathology testing budget, review of other areas such as inappropriate use of low-cost, high-volume tests may be of greater value in reducing the cost of pathology testing.

Comparison of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) versus subcutaneously implanted port-chamber catheters by complication and cost for patients receiving chemotherapy for non-haematological malignancies.

PURPOSE: Indwelling central venous catheters (CVCs) have been increasingly used to enable delivery of intravenous chemotherapy. We aimed to compare the safety and cost of two commonly used CVCs, peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICCs) and ports, in the delivery of chemotherapy in patients with non-haematological malignancies. METHODS: Seventy patients were randomly assigned to receive either a PICC or a port. The primary endpoint was occurrence of major complications, which required removal of the CVC and secondary endpoints included occurrence of any complications. RESULTS: Port devices were associated with fewer complications compared with PICC lines (hazard ratio of 0.25, CI, 0.09-0.86, P = 0.038). Major complication rate was lower in the port arm compared to the PICC arm (0.047 versus 0.193 major complications/100 catheter days, P = 0.034) with 6 versus 20 % of patients experiencing major complications, respectively. Thrombosis, the most common complication, was significantly higher in the PICC arm compared to the port arm (25 versus 0 %, P = 0.013). Quality of life and cost estimates did not differ significantly between the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: Port devices are associated with a lower risk of complications, with no difference in cost, compared to PICC lines in patients with non-haematological malignancies receiving intravenous chemotherapy.

One third of hospital costs for atherothrombotic disease are attributable to readmissions: a linked data analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the most frequent cause of death in Australia, with an associated cost burden of 11% of Australian annual health expenditure of which 40% is for hospital admissions. We investigated health outcomes and the components of hospital expenditure in the two years after an atherothrombotic disease admission to a tertiary hospital in an Australian setting. METHODS: Using data linkage we analysed two years of hospitalisation data and death records of all men and women aged 35-84 years with an admission to a Western Australian tertiary hospital for atherothrombotic disease in 2007. Costs were identified by matching the Australian refined diagnostic related group on the admission records to the published schedules of public and private hospital costs for the period of interest, and converted to 2013 Australian dollars. RESULTS: Of 6172 patients studied (74% coronary, 20% cerebrovascular, 6% peripheral), 783 (13%) died during follow-up and 174 of these were in hospital case-fatalities at index. Thirty-two percent of patients (n = 1965) accounted for 3172 readmissions to hospital with one in three having multiple hospitalisations. The hazard ratio of atherothrombotic disease readmission was 1.45 (95% CI 1.27, 1.66) in those with more than one vascular territory affected compared to those with only one territory affected after controlling for age, sex, comorbidity, admission type, procedures, and episode length of stay. The total index plus 2-year admission cost for atherothrombotic disease was calculated at $101 million; $71 million for index, and $30 million for readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients hospitalised with atherothrombotic disease, the cost of related rehospitalisations within 24 months is almost a third of the total. Much of the readmission costs fell within the first year. Whether readmissions and cost associated with atherothrombotic disease can be lowered through secondary prevention measures requires further investigation.

Two-year vascular hospitalisation rates and associated costs in patients at risk of atherothrombosis in France and Germany: highest burden for peripheral arterial disease.

OBJECTIVES: To obtain Western European perspectives on the economic burden of atherothrombosis in patients with multiple risk factors only (MRF), cerebrovascular disease (CVD), coronary artery disease (CAD), and in the under-evaluated group of patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), we examined vascular-related hospitalisation rates and associated costs in France and Germany. DESIGN: The prospective REACH Registry enrolled 4693 patients in France, and 5594 patients in Germany (from December 2003 until June 2004). METHODS: For each country, 2-year rates and costs associated with cardiovascular events and vascular-related hospitalisations were examined for patients with MRF, CVD, CAD, and PAD. RESULTS: Two-year hospitalisation costs were highest for patients with PAD (3182.1€ for France; 2724.4€ for Germany) and lowest for the MRF group (749.1€ for France; 503.3€ for Germany). Peripheral revascularizations and amputations were the greatest contributors to costs for all risk groups. Across all PAD subgroups, peripheral procedures constituted approximately half of the 2-year costs. CONCLUSION: Hospitalisation rates and costs associated with atherothrombotic disease in France and Germany are high, especially so for patients with PAD.

Bridging for an isolated subtherapeutic INR: an evaluation of clinical practice patterns, outcomes, and costs from an anticoagulation clinic.

No formal recommendations support bridging patients taking warfarin for a subtherapeutic international normalized ratio (INR). This study aimed to: (1) characterize practices at one anticoagulation clinic, (2) evaluate adverse events, and (3) compare cost of bridging versus withholding bridging for subtherapeutic INR. A retrospective chart review of 320 patients having 546 isolated subtherapeutic INR episodes included patients with an INR below their therapeutic range, preceded by two INRs within or above range. Bridged episodes required more frequent follow-up visits to achieve therapeutic INR (2.5 ± 1.0 vs. 2.2 ± 0.6; P = 0.097), but fewer days until the INR returned to therapeutic range (6.8 ± 5.0 vs. 18.9 ± 16.0; P < 0.0001). The strongest predictor of bridging was the magnitude the INR fell below the therapeutic range, where those with a severely-low INR were 30-fold more likely to be bridged (P < 0.0001), and moderately-low INR episodes were 6-fold more likely to be bridged compared with mildly-low INR (P < 0.0001). Those at high thromboembolic risk were more likely to be bridged than at low-risk (OR 3.39 [1.50-7.68]; P = 0.0034). Increasing age reduced the likelihood of being bridged (OR 0.97 [0.95-0.99]; P = 0.0118). Adverse events were infrequent in both the bridged and non-bridged; thrombosis (2.0 vs. 0.7%), major bleeding (2.0 vs. 1.3%), minor bleeding (4.1 vs. 3.1%) and bruising (18.4 vs. 3.6%). Incremental cost difference of bridging was significantly greater for total cost ($967.13) and its components, direct medical ($951.32), transportation ($2.73) and productivity cost ($13.08). It is unclear if bridging for an isolated subtherapeutic INR reduces thrombosis risk, but it is associated with higher costs.

Endovascular treatment of thrombosed dialysis fistulae: a cumulative cost analysis.

OBJECTIVES: In the present study, we determined the cumulative costs and outcomes of endovascular treatment of thrombosed autogenous arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) at our medical center. BACKGROUND: Previous studies examining the salvage procedures of thrombosed AVFs have focused exclusively on clinical outcomes, and, in the absence of costing data, current guidelines do not take into consideration economic issues. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed among local hemodialysis patients with completely thrombosed AVFs receiving endovascular treatment in our institution between January 1 and December 31, 2008. Forty-four patients were enrolled and followed-up for 1 year. Success and complications were recorded according to consensus definitions, and a comprehensive measurement of total vascular access care-related costs was obtained. Costs are reported in 2010 in U.S. dollars. RESULTS: Clinical success was achieved in 95% of cases. The primary and secondary patency rates were 63 and 78% at 1 year, respectively. Primary patency rate at 12 months was significantly better for radiocephalic AVFs (70% vs. 43%; P = 0.047). The mean cumulative cost of all vascular access care during year 1 was $2,504 (median $1,484; range, $1,362-$18,279; Table V) per patient-year at risk. The mean cumulative cost for maintaining radiocephalic and brachiocephalic AVFs was $1,624 (median $1,381; range, $1,130-$3,116) and $3,578 (median $2,092; range, $1,470-$18,279) per patient-year at risk, respectively (P = 0.022). CONCLUSION: The cost of maintenance of a thrombosed AVF by endovascular intervention is high, with patients with clotted radiocephalic fistulae incurring the lowest costs and achieving higher survival times.

Economic analysis of angiography and preemptive angioplasty to prevent hemodialysis-access thrombosis.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the economic value of early angiography and prophylactic angioplasty to prevent hemodialysis-access thrombosis. BACKGROUND: End stage renal disease consumes more than 6% of the Medicare budget. There is a need to understand the financial impact of each component of care. METHODS: We conducted an observational economic analysis of a closed cohort of 818 hemodialysis patients, of whom 560 were referred for 1437 consecutive radiographic procedures during an 8-year period. Patient-level, bottom-up microcosting methods provided supply and personnel costs before and after expansion of an angiographic referral program. RESULTS: The rate of referral for malfunctioning but nonthrombosed hemodialysis accesses increased from 18.8 +/- 8.8 to 48.3 +/- 11.9 angiographic procedures per 100 patient-years (P < 0.001), which was associated with a decline in access thrombosis from 27.6 to 22.0 events per 100 patient-years (P = 0.029) and a net cost of $34,586 per 100 patient-years. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for invasive surveillance was $6,177 per thrombosis event avoided. The angiographic program expanded at the same time that the proportion of autogenous fistulas increased from 28.3% +/- 11.3% to 59.7% +/- 10.7% of total referrals (P = 0.0001). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, the expanded angiography program (P = 0.001) and the proportion of autogenous fistulas (P = 0.0001) were both independently associated with the reduction in access thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Given the incremental costs and the relatively modest benefits in preventing access thrombosis, preemptive angiographic management may represent a less efficient use of healthcare resources than increasing the number of patients with autogenous fistulas. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Outcome of the use of stent grafts to salvage failed arteriovenous accesses.

BACKGROUND: Since elements of the Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) were implemented a decade ago, there has been a reduction in mortality for patients on hemodialysis. As patient longevity has increased, AV access site preservation by salvaging failed arteriovenous (AV) accesses has become increasingly important. However, efforts to salvage an AV access must be balanced against futile and expensive procedures. The Viabahn Endoprosthesis is a self-expandable stent graft (SG) that can be used to treat vein rupture or fibrotic lesions with significant elastic recoil following balloon angioplasty. The literature comprising the outcome of the use of SGs in salvaging failed AV accesses is limited. The purpose of this study is to determine the outcome of failed AV accesses treated with SGs and to identify patient or graft factors predictive of success. METHODS: The vascular access database and office, hospital, and dialysis unit records were retrospectively reviewed to identify all patients who underwent placement of an SG for the treatment of a thrombosed AV access between September 2004 and December 2007. Mean patient follow-up was 6 months. The K/DOQI goal for patency following a surgical intervention (6 months or later) was used to determine procedure success or failure. Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis was used to determine patency. Patient demographics and graft factors (location, diameter, length) were analyzed to identify predictors of success. RESULTS: Fifty-five SGs were placed in 48 patients (males, 29%; mean age, 61 years; diabetes mellitus, 47%) with a failed AV access. The indications were to treat significant elastic recoil or vein rupture following balloon angioplasty (47 patients) and to treat an AV graft seroma (1 patient). Cost for the VE ranged from $2337 to $3367 per patient. The procedure was deemed successful (patent at 6 months) in 29 + or - 7% of cases. Procedure success was not influenced by AV access location, endoprosthesis size (diameter or length), or patient demographic factors (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Use of the SG to salvage AV accesses falls short of the current K/DOQI clinical outcome goals for successful surgical intervention in the majority of cases. Given these results and the cost of the SG, its use is indicated in cases where AV access salvage will have an impact on long-term survival such as for patients in whom there are few options for new access placement. Further studies are needed to compare the SG to less costly options, such as angioplasty alone or angioplasty with the use of bare metal stents.

In-hospital left ventricular thrombus following ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: In-hospital left ventricular (LV) thrombus following acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has not been evaluated on a national scale and was the focus of this investigation. METHODS: We used the 2003 to 2013 Nationwide Inpatient Sample database to identify adults ≥18 years old with a principal diagnosis code of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Patients were divided into two groups defined by the presence or absence of LV thrombus. Clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were studied using relevant statistics. Multiple linear and logistic regression models were conducted to identify factors associated with LV thrombus. RESULTS: Of 1,035,888 STEMI patients hospitalized in the U. S from 2003 to 2013, 1982 (0.2%) developed acute in-hospital LV thrombus. Compared to no LV thrombus, patients with LV thrombus were more likely to have in-hospital complications; acute ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, acute renal failure, gastrointestinal bleed, cardiogenic shock, in-hospital cardiac arrest and mortality. They also had longer mean length of stay and higher hospital charges. Factors associated with LV thrombus included: anterior/anterolateral STEMI, acute or chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, atrial fibrillation, LV aneurysm, Left heart valvular disease, acute or chronic deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism and alcohol abuse. Patients with LV thrombus were less likely to be female [AOR 0.66, 95% CI (0.51-0.84)]. CONCLUSION: The identification of factors associated with early development of LV thrombus following STEMI, will help direct resources for specific high-risk group and prompt cost-effective therapies. Gender variability in LV thrombus development warrants further investigations.

[Pharmacoeconomic analysis: results of the REACH registry]. / Análisis farmacoeconómico: resultados del registro REACH.

The REACH registry includes patients from 44 countries with established atherosclerotic disease or at risk of this disease (coronary artery disease [CAD], cerebrovascular disease [CVD] and or peripheral artery disease [PAD]). The country with the largest population included in the registry was the United States, representing 38% of the total number of patients. Spain represented 3.7%. A comparative analysis of the populations from both countries as well as of the clinical management of this disease and its cost was performed. To calculate the mean total costs, drug costs, the costs of hospitalization due to vascular causes and the costs of loss of work productivity were taken into account. One of the most important results obtained after analyzing the REACH registry was the discovery of data showing the economic impact of PAD in patients with CAD or CVD. Patients with more than one diseased vascular bed had a higher associated healthcare cost due to an increase in both drug costs and hospitalization costs. Indirect costs could not be estimated for all groups. The differences in total mean costs between treating polyvascular disease and treating a single diseased vascular bed were much higher in the United States for patients with CAD + PAD vs. CAD and were much higher in Spain for patients with CVD + PAD vs. CVD. Analysis of the results of the REACH registry allows us to conclude that the presence of PAD together with CAD or CVD worsens patients' prognosis, which translates into a substantial increase in the cost of treatment, representing a greater economic burden for the Spanish national health system.

Antithrombogenic peripherally inserted central catheters: overview of efficacy and safety.

INTRODUCTION: Thrombotic complications associated with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are common, as most synthetic materials when placed in the presence of serum often result in platelet activation, fibrin deposition, thrombotic occlusion, and potentially embolization. A current innovation focus has been the development of antithrombogenic catheter materials, including hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces. These are being incorporated into PICCs in an attempt to prevent the normal thrombotic cascade leading to patient harm. AREAS COVERED: This review focuses on the laboratory efficacy and clinical effectiveness of antithrombogenic PICCs to prevent PICC-associated thrombosis, as well as their efficiency and safety. This synthesis was informed by a systematic identification of published and unpublished laboratory and clinical studies evaluating these technologies. EXPERT COMMENTARY: A range of PICCs have been developed with antithrombogenic claims, using varying technologies. However, to date, there is no peer-reviewed laboratory research describing the individual PICCs' effectiveness. Despite promising early clinical trials, adequately powered trials to establish efficacy, effectiveness, efficiency, and safety of all of the individual products have not yet been undertaken.