ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Efficient Emergency Department (ED) throughput depends on several factors, including collaboration and consultation with surgical services. The acute care surgery service (ACS) collaborated with ED to implement a new process termed "FASTPASS" (FP), which might improve patient-care for those with acute appendicitis and gallbladder disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 1-year outcome of FP. METHODS: FASTPASS is a joint collaboration between ACS and ED. ED physicians were provided with a simple check-list for diagnosing young males (<50-year old) with acute appendicitis (AA) and young males or females (<50-year old) with gallbladder disease (GBD). Once ED deemed patients fit our FP check-list, patients were directly admitted (FASTPASSed) to the observation unit. The ACS then came to evaluate the patients for possible surgical intervention. We performed outcome analysis before and after the institution of the FP. Outcomes of interest were ED length of stay (LOS), time from ED to the operating room (OR) (door-to-knife), hospital LOS (HLOS), and cost. RESULTS: During our 1-year study period, for those patients who underwent GBD/AA surgery, 56 (26%) GBD and 27 (26%) AA patients met FP criteria. Compared to the non-FP patients during FP period, FP halved ED LOS for GBD (7.4 ± 3.0 versus 3.5 ± 1.7 h, P < 0.001) and AA (6.7 ± 3.3 versus. 1.8 ± 1.6 h, P < 0.001). Similar outcome benefits were observed for door-to-knife time, HLOS, and costs. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the FP process improved ED throughput in a single, highly-trained ER leading to an overall improved patient care process. A future study involving multiple EDs and different disease processes may help decrease ED overcrowding and improve healthcare system efficiency.
Subject(s)
Appendectomy , Appendicitis/surgery , Cholecystectomy , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Gallbladder Diseases/surgery , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Surgery Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Appendectomy/economics , Appendectomy/standards , Appendectomy/statistics & numerical data , Appendicitis/diagnosis , Appendicitis/economics , Checklist/methods , Checklist/standards , Cholecystectomy/economics , Cholecystectomy/standards , Cholecystectomy/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Decision Rules , Cooperative Behavior , Efficiency, Organizational/economics , Efficiency, Organizational/standards , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Gallbladder Diseases/diagnosis , Gallbladder Diseases/economics , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Program Evaluation , Quality Improvement/economics , Quality Improvement/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Surgery Department, Hospital/economics , Surgery Department, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors , Time-to-Treatment , Triage/economics , Triage/methods , Triage/organization & administration , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A pediatric field triage strategy that meets the national policy benchmark of ≥95% sensitivity would likely improve health outcomes but increase heath care costs. Our objective was to compare the cost-effectiveness of current pediatric field triage practices to an alternative field triage strategy that meets the national policy benchmark of ≥95% sensitivity. STUDY DESIGN: We developed a decision-analysis Markov model to compare the outcomes and costs of the two strategies. We used a prospectively collected cohort of 3507 (probability weighted, unweighted n = 2832) injured children transported by 44 emergency medical services (EMS) agencies to 28 trauma and non-trauma centers in the Northwestern United States from 1/1/2011 to 12/31/2011 to derive the alternative field triage strategy and to populate model probability and cost inputs for both strategies. We compared the two strategies by calculating quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and health care costs over a time horizon from the time of injury until death. We set an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio threshold of less than $100,000 per QALY for the alternative field triage to be a cost-effective strategy. RESULTS: Current pediatric field triage practices had a sensitivity of 87.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 71.9 to 95.0%) and a specificity of 82.3% (95% CI 81.0 to 83.5%) and the alternative field triage strategy had a sensitivity of 97.3% (95% CI 82.6 to 99.6%) and a specificity of 46.1% (95% CI 43.8 to 48.4%). The alternative field triage strategy would cost $476,396 per QALY gained compared to current pediatric field triage practices and thus would not be a cost-effective strategy. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated similar findings. CONCLUSION: Current field triage practices do not meet national policy benchmarks for sensitivity. However, an alternative field triage strategy that meets the national policy benchmark of ≥95% sensitivity is not a cost-effective strategy.
Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services/economics , Triage/economics , Wounds and Injuries/classification , Adolescent , Benchmarking , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Health Care Costs , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Markov Chains , Prospective Studies , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Sensitivity and Specificity , United StatesABSTRACT
Coronavirus disease 2019 has caused a global pandemic. The majority of patients will experience mild disease, but others will develop a severe respiratory infection that requires hospitalisation. This is causing a significant strain on health services. Patients are presenting at emergency departments with symptoms of dyspnoea, dry cough and fever with varying severity. The appropriate triaging of patients will assist in preventing health services becoming overwhelmed during the pandemic. This is assisted through clinical assessment and various imaging and laboratory investigations, including chest X-ray, blood analysis and identification of viral infection with SARS-CoV-2. Here, a succinct triaging pathway that aims to be fast, reliable and affordable is presented. The hope is that such a pathway will assist health services in appropriately combating the pandemic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Clinical Decision-Making , Hospitalization , Patient Isolation , Triage/methods , Blood Gas Analysis , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , COVID-19 Serological Testing , Disease Management , Early Warning Score , Electrocardiography , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Personal Protective Equipment , Radiography, Thoracic , Risk Assessment , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Triage/economicsABSTRACT
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Academic, tertiary care, level I trauma center in a rural state. BACKGROUND: Unnecessary transfer of certain facial trauma patients results in a burden of time, money, and other resources on both the patient and healthcare system; identification and development of outpatient treatment pathways for these patients is a significant opportunity for cost savings. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the treatment and disposition of un-complicated, stable, isolated facial trauma injuries transferred from outside hospitals and determine the significance of secondary overtriage. METHODS: Retrospective chart review utilizing our institutional trauma database, including patients transferred to our emergency department between January 2012 and December 2017. Patients were identified by ICD9 or ICD10 codes and only those with isolated facial trauma were included. RESULTS: We identified 538 isolated facial trauma patients who were transferred to our institution during the study period. The majority of those patients were transferred via ground ambulance for an average of 76 miles. Overall, 82% of patients (N = 440) were discharged directly from our institution's emergency department. Almost 30% of patients did not require any formal treatment for their injuries; the potential savings associated with elimination of these unnecessary transfers was estimated to be between $388,605 and $771,372. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a high rate of patients with stable, isolated facial trauma that could potentially be evaluated and treated without emergent transfer. The minimization of these unnecessary transfers represents a significant opportunity for cost and resource utilization savings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b- Economic and Cost Analysis.
Subject(s)
Cost Savings , Critical Pathways/economics , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Facial Injuries/diagnosis , Facial Injuries/economics , Health Resources/economics , Medical Overuse/economics , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Transfer/economics , Trauma Centers/economics , Triage/economics , Adult , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Transient ischemic attack (TIA) can be a warning sign of an impending stroke. The objective of our study is to assess the feasibility, safety, and cost savings of a comprehensive TIA protocol in the emergency room for low-risk TIA patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center cohort study performed at an academic comprehensive stroke center. We implemented an emergency department-based TIA protocol pathway for low-risk TIA patients (defined as ABCD2 score < 4 and without significant vessel stenosis) who were able to undergo vascular imaging and a brain MRI in the emergency room. Patients were set up with rapid outpatient follow-up in our stroke clinic and scheduled for an outpatient echocardiogram, if indicated. We compared this cohort to TIA patients admitted prior to the implementation of the TIA protocol who would have qualified. Outcomes of interest included length of stay, hospital cost, radiographic and echocardiogram findings, recurrent neurovascular events within 30 days, and final diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients were assessed (65 patients in the pre-pathway cohort, 73 in the expedited, post-TIA pathway implementation cohort). Average time from MRI order to MRI end was 6.4 h compared to 2.3 h in the pre- and post-pathway cohorts, respectively (p < 0.0001). The average length of stay for the pre-pathway group was 28.8 h in the pre-pathway cohort compared to 7.7 h in the post-pathway cohort (p < 0.0001). There were no differences in neuroimaging or echocardiographic findings. There were no differences in the 30 days re-presentation for stroke or TIA or mortality between the two groups. The direct cost per TIA admission was $2,944.50 compared to $1,610.50 for TIA patients triaged through the pathway at our institution. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and cost-savings of a comprehensive, emergency department-based TIA protocol. Further study is needed to confirm overall benefit of an expedited approach to TIA patient management and guide clinical practice recommendations.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Hospital Costs , Ischemic Attack, Transient/economics , Ischemic Attack, Transient/therapy , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Clinical Protocols , Cost Savings , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Support Techniques , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Ischemic Attack, Transient/diagnostic imaging , Ischemic Attack, Transient/mortality , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Triage/economicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In 2010, a virtual sarcoma referral model was implemented, which aims to provide a centralised multidisciplinary team (MDT) to provide rapid advice, avoiding unnecessary appointments and providing a streamlined service. The aim of this study is to examine the feasibility of this screening tool in reducing the service burden and expediting patient journey. METHODS AND RESULTS: All referrals made to a single tertiary referral sarcoma unit from January 2010 to December 2018 were extracted from a prospective database. Only 26.0% events discussed required review directly. 30.3% were discharged back to referrer. 16.5% required further investigations. 22.5% required a biopsy prior to review. There was a reduction in the rate of patients reviewed at the sarcoma clinic, and a higher discharge rate from the MDT in 2018 versus 2010 (p < 0.001). This gives a potential cost saving of 670,700 GBP over the 9 year period. CONCLUSION: An MDT meeting which triages referrals is cost-effective at reducing unnecessary referrals. This can limit unnecessary exposure of patients who may have an underlying diagnosis of cancer to a high-risk environment, and reduces burden on services as it copes with increasing demands during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Subject(s)
Oncology Service, Hospital , Patient Care Team , Referral and Consultation , Sarcoma/therapy , Triage/methods , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Feasibility Studies , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Male , Oncology Service, Hospital/economics , Oncology Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/economics , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Referral and Consultation/economics , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration , Sarcoma/diagnosis , Sarcoma/economics , Scotland/epidemiology , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Tertiary Care Centers/organization & administration , Triage/economics , VideoconferencingABSTRACT
Background Minor stroke is common and may represent up to two-thirds of cases of acute ischemic stroke. The cost-effectiveness of CT angiography in patients with minor stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score ≤6) is not well established. Purpose To evaluate cost-effectiveness of CT angiography in the detection of large-vessel occlusion (LVO) in patients with acute minor stroke (NIHSS score ≤6). Materials and Methods A Markov decision-analytic model with a societal perspective was constructed. Three different management strategies were evaluated: (a) no vascular imaging and best medical management, (b) CT angiography for all patients and immediate thrombectomy for LVO after intravenous thrombolysis, and (c) CT angiography for all and best medical management (including intravenous thrombolysis, with rescue thrombectomy for patients with LVO and neurologic deterioration). One-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Results Base-case calculation showed that CT angiography followed by immediate thrombectomy had the lowest cost ($346 007) and highest health benefits (9.26 quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]). CT angiography followed by best medical management with possible rescue thrombectomy for patients with LVO had a slightly higher cost ($346 500) and lower health benefits (9.09 QALYs). No vascular imaging had the highest cost and lowest health benefits. The difference in health benefits compared with the CT angiography and immediate thrombectomy strategy was 0.39 QALY, which corresponds to 142 days in perfect health per patient. The conclusion was robust in a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. CT angiography was cost-effective when the probability of LVO was greater than 0.16% in patients with acute minor stroke. The net monetary benefit of performing CT angiography was higher in younger patients ($68 950 difference between CT angiography followed by immediate thrombectomy and no vascular imaging in 55-year-old patients compared with $20 931 in 85-year-old patients). Conclusion Screening for large-vessel occlusion with CT angiography in patients with acute minor stroke is cost-effective and associated with improved health outcomes. Undetected large-vessel occlusion in the absence of vascular imaging results in worse health outcomes and higher costs. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Subject(s)
Computed Tomography Angiography , Stroke , Triage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Computed Tomography Angiography/economics , Computed Tomography Angiography/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Middle Aged , Stroke/classification , Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Stroke/economics , Stroke/epidemiology , Triage/economics , Triage/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of undertriage among older injured Medicare beneficiaries, identify any regions in which undertriage is more likely to occur, and examine additional factors associated with undertriage at a national level. METHODS: Using 2009 to 2014 Medicare claims data, we identified older adults (≥65 years) receiving a diagnosis of traumatic injury, and linked claims with trauma center designation records from the American Trauma Society. Undertriage was defined as nontrauma centers treatment with an Injury Severity Score greater than or equal to 16, consistent with the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma benchmark. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate odds of undertriage by census region, adjusting for sex, race, age, Injury Severity Score, trauma center proximity, and mode of transportation. RESULTS: Forty-six percent of severely injured patients (n=125,731) were treated at a nontrauma center. Compared with that for patients in the Midwest, adjusted odds of undertriage were 100% higher for patients in Southern states (odds ratio [OR] 2.00; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.00 to 2.04) and 78% higher in Western states (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.73 to 1.82). Compared with that for patients aged 65 to 69 years, odds of undertriage gradually increased in all age groups, reaching 57% for patients older than 80 years (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.52 to 1.61). Distance to a trauma center was associated with increasing odds of undertriage, with 37% higher odds (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.15 to 1.40) for older adults living more than 30 miles from a trauma center compared with patients living within 15 miles. CONCLUSION: Nearly half of older adult trauma patients are undertriaged; it increases with age and distance to care and is most common in Southern and Western states. Improvements to field triage and trauma center access for older patients are urgently needed.
Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Medicare , Trauma Centers , Triage/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Aged , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Insurance Claim Review , Male , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Retrospective Studies , Triage/economics , United States/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/economicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Inpatient dermatology care can be challenging for dermatologists. Currently teledermatology is widely used in the outpatient setting but is not common in the inpatient setting, although it has the potential to reduce wait times and improve access to care. OBJECTIVE: To review the available literature on inpatient teledermatology, assess how teledermatology is currently being used in the inpatient setting, and recommend best practice use of inpatient teledermatology. METHODS: A literature review was performed and dermatology attending physicians were surveyed at the Society for Dermatology Hospitalists annual meeting about their current use of inpatient teledermatology. RESULTS: The majority of attending physicians (80.8%, n = 21/26) responded that their institution uses some form of teledermatology. Approximately half of those using teledermatology used it for both inpatient and outpatient consultations (55%, n = 11/20). For institutions with inpatient teledermatology, attending physicians used teledermatology to remotely staff inpatient consultations (81.8%, n = 9/11), triage consultations (63.6%, n = 7/11), and answer curbside questions from primary teams (18.2%, n = 2/11). LIMITATIONS: The limitations of this study include a limited sample size from a single meeting. CONCLUSION: Inpatient teledermatology is currently under-utilized has the potential to increase access to dermatology care and may be best used for triaging and remote staffing. Additionally, standardization of platforms and reimbursement would allow for increased use of inpatient teledermatology.
Subject(s)
Dermatology/methods , Hospitalization , Professional Practice Gaps , Remote Consultation/standards , Triage/methods , Dermatology/economics , Dermatology/standards , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Reimbursement Mechanisms/standards , Remote Consultation/economics , Triage/economics , Triage/standardsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is defined as Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 14 or 15. Despite good outcomes, patients are commonly transferred to trauma centers for observation and/or neurosurgical consultation. The aim of this study is to assess the value of redefining mTBI with novel radiographic criteria to determine the appropriateness of interhospital transfer for neurosurgical evaluation. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients with blunt head injury with GCS 13-15 and CT head from Jan 2014-Dec 2016 was performed. A novel criteria of head CT findings was created at our institution to classify mTBI. Outcomes included neurosurgical intervention and transfer cost. RESULTS: A total of 2120 patients were identified with 1442 (68.0%) meeting CT criteria for mTBI and 678 (32.0%) classified high risk. Two (0.14%) patients with mTBI required neurosurgical intervention compared with 143 (21.28%) high risk TBI (pâ¯<â¯0.0001). Mean age (55.8â¯years), and anticoagulation (2.6% vs 2.8%) or antiplatelet use (2.1% vs 3.0%) was similar between groups (pâ¯>â¯0.05). Of patients with mTBI, 689 were transferred without receiving neurosurgical intervention. Given an average EMS transfer cost of $700 for ground and $5800 for air, we estimate an unnecessary transfer cost of $733,600. CONCLUSION: Defining mTBI with the described novel criteria clearly identifies patients who can be safely managed without transfer for neurosurgical consultation. These unnecessary transfers represent a substantial financial and resource burden to the trauma system and inconvenience to patients.
Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic/diagnosis , Hospital Costs , Referral and Consultation/economics , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Trauma Centers , Triage/economics , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics , Triage/methodsABSTRACT
Approximately 3.6 million cases of active tuberculosis (TB) go potentially undiagnosed annually, partly due to limited access to confirmatory diagnostic tests, such as molecular assays or mycobacterial culture, in community and primary healthcare settings. This article provides guidance for TB triage test evaluations. A TB triage test is designed for use in people with TB symptoms and/or significant risk factors for TB. Triage tests are simple and low-cost tests aiming to improve ease of access and implementation (compared with confirmatory tests) and decrease the proportion of patients requiring more expensive confirmatory testing. Evaluation of triage tests should occur in settings of intended use, such as community and primary healthcare centers. Important considerations for triage test evaluation include study design, population, sample type, test throughput, use of thresholds, reference standard (ideally culture), and specimen flow. The impact of a triage test will depend heavily on issues beyond accuracy, primarily centered on implementation.
Subject(s)
Biological Assay/standards , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/standards , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Triage/methods , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Adult , Biological Assay/economics , Biomarkers/blood , Biomarkers/urine , Blood Culture/standards , Child , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/economics , Humans , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/pathogenicity , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/physiology , Reference Standards , Research Design , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sputum/microbiology , Triage/economics , Triage/standards , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/microbiology , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/physiopathology , World Health OrganizationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis is a major challenge to health in the developing world. Triage prior to diagnostic testing could potentially reduce the volume of tests and costs associated with using the more accurate, but costly, Xpert MTB/RIF assay. An effective methodology to predict the impact of introducing triage prior to tuberculosis diagnostic testing could be useful in helping to guide policy. METHODS: The development and use of operational modelling to project the impact on case detection and health system costs of alternative triage approaches for tuberculosis, with or without X-ray, based on data from Porto Alegre City, Brazil. RESULTS: Most of the triage approaches modelled without X-ray were predicted to provide no significant benefit. One approach based on an artificial neural network applied to patient and symptom characteristics was projected to increase case detection (82% vs. 75%) compared to microscopy, and reduce costs compared to Xpert without triage. In addition, use of X-ray before diagnostic testing for HIV-negative patients could maintain diagnostic yield of using Xpert without triage, and reduce costs. CONCLUSION: A model for the impact assessment of alternative triage approaches has been tested. The results from using the approach demonstrate its usefulness in informing policy in a typical high burden setting for tuberculosis.
Subject(s)
Decision Support Techniques , Radiography, Thoracic , Triage/methods , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Algorithms , Brazil/epidemiology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Mass Screening/economics , Mass Screening/methods , Microbiological Techniques/economics , Microbiological Techniques/methods , Models, Organizational , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification , Radiography, Thoracic/economics , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sputum/microbiology , Triage/economics , Triage/organization & administration , Tuberculosis/economics , Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/epidemiology , X-RaysABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is the gold standard in the diagnosis of significant bowel disease (SBD), including colorectal cancer, high-risk adenoma and inflammatory bowel disease. As the demand for colonoscopy services is placing significant pressure on hospital resources, new solutions are needed to manage patients more efficiently and effectively. AIM: We investigated the impact of using a risk assessment tool (RAT) to improve selection of patients for colonoscopy procedures to detect SBD. METHODS: A hybrid simulation model was constructed to replicate the current patient triage bookings and waiting times in a large metropolitan hospital. The model used data on 327 patients who were retrospectively assessed for risk of SBD. Risk assessment incorporated blood and faecal immunochemical test results, gender and age in addition to patient symptoms. The model was calibrated over 12 months to current outcomes and was compared with the RAT and a third scenario where low-risk patients did not proceed to a colonoscopy. One-way sensitivity analyses were undertaken. RESULTS: Using the RAT was expected to shorten waiting times by 153 days for moderately-urgent patients and 138 days for non-urgent patients. If low-risk patients did not proceed to colonoscopy, waiting times were expected to reduce for patients with SBD by 17 days producing cost-savings of AU$373 824 through avoided colonoscopies. CONCLUSIONS: A hybrid model that combines patient-level characteristics with hospital-level resource constraints can demonstrate improved efficiency in a hospital clinic. Further research on risk assessment is required to improve quality patient care and reduce low-value service delivery.
Subject(s)
Colonoscopy , Cost Savings/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment/methods , Triage/methods , Australia , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Triage/economicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A model for triaging patients in primary care to provide immediate contact with the most appropriate profession to treat the condition in question has been developed and implemented in parts of Sweden. Direct triaging of patients with musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) to physiotherapists at primary healthcare centres has been proposed as an alternative to initial assessment by general practitioners (GPs) and has been shown to have many positive effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness from the societal perspective of this new care-pathway through primary care regarding triaging patients with MSD to initial assessment by physiotherapists compared to standard practice with initial GP assessment. METHODS: Nurse-assessed patients with MSD (N = 55) were randomised to initial assessment and treatment with either physiotherapists or GPs and were followed for 1 year regarding health-related quality of life, utilization of healthcare resources and absence from work for MSD. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated based on EQ5D measured at 5 time-points. Costs for healthcare resources and production loss were compiled. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERS) were calculated. Multiple imputation was used to compensate for missing values and bootstrapping to handle uncertainty. A cost-effectiveness plane and a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve were construed to describe the results. RESULTS: The group who were allocated to initial assessment by physiotherapists had slightly larger gains in QALYs at lower total costs. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of 20,000 , the likelihood that the intervention was cost-effective from a societal perspective including production loss due to MSD was 85% increasing to 93% at higher thresholds. When only healthcare costs were considered, triaging to physiotherapists was still less costly in relation to health improvements than standard praxis. CONCLUSION: From the societal perspective, this small study indicated that triaging directly to physiotherapists in primary care has a high likelihood of being cost-effective. However, further larger randomised trials will be necessary to corroborate these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02218749 . Registered August 18, 2014.
Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Musculoskeletal Diseases/therapy , Primary Health Care/economics , Triage/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Critical Pathways/economics , Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Female , Follow-Up Studies , General Practitioners/economics , General Practitioners/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Diseases/diagnosis , Musculoskeletal Diseases/psychology , Nurses/economics , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Physical Therapists/economics , Physical Therapists/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Sweden , Treatment Outcome , Triage/statistics & numerical data , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Substantial policy, communication and operational gaps exist between mental health services and the police for individuals with enduring mental health needs. AIMS: To map and cost pathways through mental health and police services, and to model the cost impact of implementing key policy recommendations. METHOD: Within a case-linkage study, we estimated 1-year individual-level healthcare and policing costs. Using decision modelling, we then estimated the potential impact on costs of three recommended service enhancements: street triage, Mental Health Act assessments for all Section 136 detainees and outreach custody link workers. RESULTS: Under current care, average 1-year mental health and police costs were £10 812 and £4552 per individual respectively (n = 55). The cost per police incident was £522. Models suggested that each service enhancement would alter per incident costs by between -8% and +6%. CONCLUSIONS: Recommended enhancements to care pathways only marginally increase individual-level costs.
Subject(s)
Emergency Services, Psychiatric/economics , Mental Disorders/economics , Mental Health Services/economics , Police/economics , Triage/economics , England , Humans , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short-term consequences and cost-effectiveness associated with the use of novel biomarkers to triage young adult women with minor cervical cytological lesions. DESIGN: Model-based economic evaluation using primary epidemiological data from Norway, supplemented with data from European and American clinical trials. SETTING: Organised cervical cancer screening in Norway. POPULATION: Women aged 25-33 years with minor cervical cytological lesions detected at their primary screening test. METHODS: We expanded an existing simulation model to compare 12 triage strategies involving alternative biomarkers (i.e. reflex human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA/mRNA testing, genotyping, and dual staining) with the current Norwegian triage guidelines. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of high-grade precancers detected and resource use (e.g. monetary costs and colposcopy referrals) for a single screening round (3 years) for each triage strategy. Cost-efficiency, defined as the additional cost per additional precancer detected of each strategy compared with the next most costly strategy. RESULTS: Five strategies were identified as cost-efficient, and are projected to increase the precancer detection rate between 18 and 57%, compared with current guidelines; however, the strategies did not uniformly require additional resources. Strategies involving HPV mRNA testing required fewer resources, whereas HPV DNA-based strategies detected >50% more precancers, but were more costly and required twice as many colposcopy referrals compared with the current guidelines. CONCLUSION: Strategies involving biomarkers to triage younger women with minor cervical cytological lesions have the potential to detect additional precancers, yet the optimal strategy depends on the resources available as well as decision-makers' and women's acceptance of additional screening procedures. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Women with minor cervical lesions may be triaged more accurately and effectively using novel biomarkers.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers/analysis , Early Detection of Cancer/economics , Triage/economics , Uterine Cervical Diseases/diagnosis , Adult , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Female , Human Papillomavirus DNA Tests , Humans , Norway , Triage/statistics & numerical data , Uterine Cervical Diseases/economics , Vaginal Smears , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-effectiveness of two commonly used strategies and an alternative triage strategy for patients with Stage IB cervical cancer in the U.S., Canada, and Korea. METHODS: A Markov state-transition model was constructed to compare three strategies: (1) radical hysterectomy followed by tailored adjuvant therapy (primary surgery), (2) primary chemoradiation, and (3) an MRI-based triage strategy, in which patients without risk factors in preoperative MRI undergo primary surgery and those with risk factors undergo primary chemoradiation. All relevant literature was identified to extract the probability data. Cost data were calculated from the perspective of U.S., Canadian, and Korean payers. Strategies were compared using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Cost-effectiveness ratios were analyzed separately using data from each country. RESULTS: Base case analysis showed that the triage strategy was the most cost-effective of the three strategies in all countries at usual willingness-to-pay threshold (Korea: $30,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), Canada and US: $100,000 per QALY). Monte Carlo simulation acceptability curves from Korea indicated that at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $30,000/QALY, triage strategy was the treatment of choice in 71% of simulations. Monte Carlo simulation acceptability curves from US and Canada indicated that at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY, triage strategy was the treatment of choice in more than half of simulations. CONCLUSIONS: An MRI-based triage strategy was shown to be more cost-effective than primary surgery or primary chemoradiation in the US, Canada, and Korea.
Subject(s)
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/enzymology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/therapy , Canada , Chemoradiotherapy/economics , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Trees , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy/economics , Hysterectomy/methods , Lymph Node Excision/economics , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Markov Chains , Neoplasm Staging , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Republic of Korea , Triage/economics , Triage/methods , United States , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
The goal of this study was to better integrate emergency medical and psychiatric care at a large urban public hospital, identify impact on quality improvement metrics, and reduce healthcare cost. A psychiatric fast track service was implemented as a quality improvement initiative. Data on disposition from the emergency department from January 2011 to May 2012 for patients impacted by the pilot were analyzed. 4329 patients from January 2011 to August 2011 (pre-intervention) were compared with 4867 patients from September 2011 to May 2012 (intervention). There was a trend of decline on overall quality metrics of time to triage and time from disposition to discharge. The trend analysis of the psychiatric length of stay and use of restraints showed significant reductions. Integrated emergency care models are evidence-based approach to ensuring that patients with mental health needs receive proper and efficient treatment. Results suggest that this may also improve overall emergency department's throughput.
Subject(s)
Emergency Services, Psychiatric/standards , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Emergency Services, Psychiatric/economics , Emergency Services, Psychiatric/organization & administration , Georgia , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/trends , Quality Improvement/economics , Quality Indicators, Health Care/economics , Quality Indicators, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality Indicators, Health Care/trends , Triage/economics , Triage/statistics & numerical data , Triage/trendsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Telephone triage is increasingly used to manage workload in primary care; however, supporting evidence for this approach is scarce. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and cost consequences of general practitioner-(GP)-led and nurse-led telephone triage compared with usual care for patients seeking same-day consultations in primary care. METHODS: We did a pragmatic, cluster-randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation between March 1, 2011, and March 31, 2013, at 42 practices in four centres in the UK. Practices were randomly assigned (1:1:1), via a computer-generated randomisation sequence minimised for geographical location, practice deprivation, and practice list size, to either GP-led triage, nurse-led computer-supported triage, or usual care. We included patients who telephoned the practice seeking a same-day face-to-face consultation with a GP. Allocations were concealed from practices until after they had agreed to participate and a stochastic element was included within the minimisation algorithm to maintain concealment. Patients, clinicians, and researchers were not masked to allocation, but practice assignment was concealed from the trial statistician. The primary outcome was primary care workload (patient contacts, including those attending accident and emergency departments) in the 28 days after the first same-day request. Analyses were by intention to treat and per protocol. This trial was registered with the ISRCTN register, number ISRCTN20687662. FINDINGS: We randomly assigned 42 practices to GP triage (n=13), nurse triage (n=15), or usual care (n=14), and 20,990 patients (n=6695 vs 7012 vs 7283) were randomly assigned, of whom 16,211 (77%) patients provided primary outcome data (n=5171 vs 5468 vs 5572). GP triage was associated with a 33% increase in the mean number of contacts per person over 28 days compared with usual care (2·65 [SD 1·74] vs 1·91 [1·43]; rate ratio [RR] 1·33, 95% CI 1·30-1·36), and nurse triage with a 48% increase (2·81 [SD 1·68]; RR 1·48, 95% CI 1·44-1·52). Eight patients died within 7 days of the index request: five in the GP-triage group, two in the nurse-triage group, and one in the usual-care group; however, these deaths were not associated with the trial group or procedures. Although triage interventions were associated with increased contacts, estimated costs over 28 days were similar between all three groups (roughly £75 per patient). INTERPRETATION: Introduction of telephone triage delivered by a GP or nurse was associated with an increase in the number of primary care contacts in the 28 days after a patient's request for a same-day GP consultation, with similar costs to those of usual care. Telephone triage might be useful in aiding the delivery of primary care. The whole-system implications should be assessed when introduction of such a system is considered. FUNDING: Health Technology Assessment Programme UK National Institute for Health Research.