Randomised phase II trial of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine vs gemcitabine plus cisplatin vs gemcitabine plus capecitabine in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: An increasing proportion of patients are exposed to anthracyclines and/or taxanes in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting. Re-exposure in the metastatic stage is limited by drug resistance, thus evaluation of non-cross-resistant regimens is mandatory. METHODS: Anthracycline-pretreated patients were randomly assigned to three gemcitabine-based regimens. Chemotherapy consisted of gemcitabine 1.000 mg m(-2) plus vinorelbin 25 mg m(-2) on days 1+8 (GemVin), or plus cisplatin 30 mg m(-2) on days 1+8 (GemCis), or plus capecitabine 650 mg m(-2) b.i.d. orally days 1-14 (GemCap), q3w. The primary end point was response rate. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients were recruited on the trial. The overall response rates were 39.0% (GemVin), 47.7% (GemCis) and 34.7% (GemCap). Median progression-free survival was estimated with 5.7, 6.9 and 8.3 months, respectively. Corresponding median survival times were 17.5 (GemVin), 13.0 (GemCis) and 19.4 months (GemCap). Neutropenia ≥grade 3 occurred in 16.7% (Gem/Vin), 4.4% (GemCis) and 0% (Gem/Cap), whereas non-haematological toxicities were rarely severe except grade 3 hand-foot syndrome in 2.0% of the GemCap patients (per patient analysis). CONCLUSIONS: This randomised phase II trial has revealed comparable results for three gemcitabine-based regimens regarding treatment efficacy and toxicity. Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy appears to be a worthwhile treatment option for pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Correlation of capecitabine-induced skin toxicity with treatment efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the German AIO KRK-0104 trial.

BACKGROUND: The AIO KRK-0104 randomised phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of two capecitabine-based regimens: combination of capecitabine and irinotecan (CAPIRI) plus cetuximab (CAPIRI-C) and combination of capecitabine with oxaliplatin (CAPOX) plus cetuximab (CAPOX-C) in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Treatment-related skin toxicity (ST) was evaluated separately for capecitabine and cetuximab. The present analysis investigates the correlation of capecitabine-attributed ST (Cape-ST) and parameters of treatment efficacy. METHODS: Patients with mCRC were randomised to cetuximab (400 mg m(-2), day 1, followed by 250 mg m(-2) weekly) plus CAPIRI (irinotecan 200 mg m(-2), day 1; capecitabine 800 mg m(-2), twice daily, days 1-14, every 3 weeks), or cetuximab plus CAPOX (oxaliplatin 130 mg m(-2), day 1; capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2), twice daily, days 1-14, every 3 weeks). RESULTS: Of 185 recruited patients, 149 (CAPIRI-C, n=78; CAPOX-C, n=71) received study treatment beyond the first tumour assessment and were evaluable for efficacy. Capecitabine-attributed ST, predominantly hand-foot syndrome, was observed in 32.2% of patients. Capecitabine-attributed ST grade 1-3 was associated with a significantly higher disease control rate (DCR) (97.9 vs 86.1%, P=0.038) compared with grade 0 toxicity. Moreover, Cape-ST grade 1-3 related to a markedly longer progression-free survival (PFS) (9.9 vs 5.6 months, P<0.001) and overall survival (OS) (32.8 vs 22.4 months, P=0.008). Separate analyses of treatment arms indicated that the effect of Cape-ST on PFS remained significant for both arms, whereas the effect on OS remained apparent as a strong trend. CONCLUSION: This analysis supports the hypothesis that for the evaluated regimens, a correlation exists between Cape-ST and treatment efficacy regarding DCR, PFS, and OS.

[Treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonists]. / Antiemetische Therapie mit 5-HT(3)-Antagonisten in der onkologischen Praxis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists have proved to be highly efficacious in the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). However, several questions remain concerning the relative efficacy of various approved anti-emetics, especially with respect to dosage, duration and timing of administration, as well as differences in toxicity profiles. Thus it seemed appropriate to assess the current therapeutic results in routine daily practice, when applying antiemetic therapy according to established guidelines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Within LINO e.V., a group of medical oncologists in private ambulant practice (LINO: Association of private-practice medical oncologists in Bavaria), a total of 738 cycles of moderately or highly emesis-inducing chemotherapy were randomly assigned to three treatment options: (1)granisetron 1 mg (GRA1). (2) 3 mg (GRA3), and (3) ondansetron 8 mg (OND8), each combined with 8 mg dexamethasone. Incidence and severity of acute (day 1) and delayed CINV (day 2-5) and the subjective assessment of efficacy were documented on questionnaires filled in by the patients. RESULTS: All of the three regimens adequately prevented vomiting in the majority of the patients. However, all measured effects showed an uniform trend towards slightly decreased efficacy with 8 mg of ondansetron. These differences were predominantly detected with respect to delayed CINV on days 2 to 5, especially after chemotherapy with anthracyclin/cyclophosphamide combination therapy. CONCLUSION: Granisetron, at two different dosage regimens, and ondasetron showed adequate reduction in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, but ondansetron worked slightly less so.

High efficacy and low toxicity of weekly docetaxel given as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel is one of the most effective antitumor agents currently available for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This phase II multicenter study prospectively analyzed the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel given on a weekly schedule as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients received docetaxel, 35 mg/m(2) weekly for 6 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of rest. Subsequent cycles (3 weeks of treatment, 2 weeks of rest) were given until a maximum of 5 cycles or disease progression. Premedication consisted of 8 mg dexamethasone intravenously 30 min prior to the infusion of docetaxel. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients at a median age of 58 years with previously untreated MBC were included in the study. A median of 10 doses (median cumulative dose 339 mg/m(2)) was administered (range: 2-18). The overall response rate was 48.1% (95% CI: 34-61%, intent-to-treat). Median survival was 15.8 months and median time to progression was 5.9 months (intent-to-treat). Hematological toxicity was mild with absence of neutropenia-related complications. Grade 3 neutropenia was observed in 3.7% of patients and grade 3 and 4 anemia was observed in 5.6 and 1.9% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: The weekly administration of docetaxel is highly efficient and safe as first-line treatment for MBC and may serve as an important treatment option specifically in elderly patients and patients with a reduced performance status.

[Early changes in thyroid hormones following radioiodine therapy of hyperthyroidism with reference to etiology and accompanying medication]. / Frühveränderungen der Schilddrüsenhormone nach Radiojodtherapie der Hyperthyreose unter Berücksichtigung von Atiologie und begleitender Medikation.

Radioiodine therapy (RITh) is an effective mode of treatment of different types of hyperthyroidism (immunogenic, IH; nonimmunogenic, NIH). The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of thyroid storm after RITh. For this purpose a systematic determination of thyroid hormones (TT3, TT4) 5 and if possible 12 days after RITh was performed in 416 patients with borderline or overt hyperthyroidism. Additional antithyroid medication after RITh was necessary in 20 patients. Among the remaining 396 patients 48% had been pretreated with antithyroid drugs because of more severe clinical symptoms. This medication was canceled 10 to 5 days before RITh in all cases. After RITh the mean TT3 and TT4 levels of the subgroups, with and without antithyroid premedication, decreased nearly in parallel course. The whole group of 396 patients presented a significant decrease in TT3 levels with a mean from 1.9 to 1.4 ng/ml. In 18 cases (5%) an increase in TT3 level (greater than or equal to 0.5 ng/ml) was detected without requiring antithyroid therapy. No case of thyroid storm was observed in the entire patient group. TT3 decrease appeared to be more pronounced in patients with higher pretreatment levels. TT4 showed a significant decrease only in case of elevated levels. Post-therapeutic hormone levels were not dependent on the etiology of hyperthyroidism (IH, NIH). The decrease of TT3 levels in the IH group was more pronounced after application of 150 Gy compared with 60 Gy. The additional medication with propranolol (greater than or equal to 60 mg/day) enforced the TT3 decrease. Accompanying glucocorticoid medication had no influence on the hormone levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Idarubicin monotherapy in multiply pretreated leukemia patients: response in relation to P-glycoprotein expression.

The aim of the study was to test whether fractionated (weekly) idarubicin administration to multiply pretreated leukemia patients is effective and tolerable for outpatient treatment, and whether idarubicin alone can overcome P-glycoprotein (P-gp)-related resistance. P-gp was assessed with an immunocytological technique using the monoclonal antibody 4E3.16. P-gp. expression was characterized as a percentage of P-gp-positive blasts. Additionally, the function of P-gp was determined with the rhodamine-123 (R-123) accumulation test in combination with or without verapamil and expressed as the R123 accumulation ratio. Fractionated idarubicin (12 mg/m2/week) was given to 36 acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) patients, 12 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients, and eight chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients in blast crisis. Furthermore, 11 AML and four ALL patients were treated with fractionated daunorubicin at a dose of 50 mg/m2/week. All patients had been pretreated with drugs inducing P-gp-related resistance including daunorubicin and/or doxorubicin or vindesine (CML patients). Of 71 pretreated patients, 51 (72%) had a P-gp value between 25 and 98%. Six of these patients with increased P-gp expression had a nonpumping P-gp; four of them were CD34 positive. Of 51 patients with increased P-gp expression, 30 (59%) were CD34 positive. With regard to idarubicin monotherapy, overall response was 33/56 (59%) patients, and 23/33 (70%) responding patients showed a P-gp expression between 25 and 95%. All idarubicin-responding patients with high P-gp expression before treatment showed a clear reduction of P-gp-positive blasts. No patients with P-gp expression between 34 and 85% treated with fractionated daunorubicin showed response or reduction of P-gp-positive blasts in bone marrow. This study demonstrates that P-gp-related resistance can be overcome in multiply pretreated leukemia patients with idarubicin alone, and that the protocol used here is tolerable for outpatient treatment.