Clopidogrel increases bleeding complications in patients undergoing heart rhythm device procedures.

BACKGROUND: Management of antiplatelet therapy at the time of device implantation remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the risk of bleeding complications in patients receiving clopidogrel at the time of cardiac device surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case-control study. Between 2004 and 2010, 101 consecutive patients receiving clopidogrel underwent cardiac device surgery (pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, and generator replacement) in our institution. Controls were 1:1 matched on age, sex, device, type of procedure, number of leads implanted, and venous approach (cephalic or subclavian). A significant bleeding complication was defined as pocket hematoma requiring surgical evacuation or prolonged hospitalization, hemothorax, pericardial effusion, or tamponade. RESULTS: Bleeding complications occurred more frequently in patients receiving clopidogrel at the time of device procedure: 11.9% versus 4.0% (P = 0.037; odds radio [OR] 3.27 [1.02-10.5]). Significant bleeding complications were noted in 12 patients (11.9%) receiving clopidogrel, including two patients with pericardial effusion and one patient with hemothorax. Four controls (4.0%) had bleeding complications (three pocket hematomas and one pericardial effusion). The single factor associated with increased bleeding complications in patients receiving clopidogrel was subclavian puncture (P = 0.008). In the entire cohort (n = 202), multivariate analysis identified two independent predictors of significant bleeding complications: clopidogrel treatment at the time of surgery (P = 0.03; OR 3.7 [1.1-12.6]) and subclavian venous puncture (P = 0.03; OR 3.44 [1.1-10.4]). CONCLUSIONS: Clopidogrel treatment at the time of heart rhythm device procedures is associated with an increased risk of significant bleeding complications. Subclavian puncture seems to strongly increase hemorrhagic complications in this setting.

Basal exit site of clinical ventricular tachycardia is an independent predictor of antitachycardia pacing failure in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators recipients.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about predictors of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) failure in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients. Distance between the stimulation site and the ventricular tachycardia (VT) site of origin may critically affect ATP effectiveness. We hypothesized that ATP may be less effective in ICD patients who had basal VT than in those who had apical VT. METHODS: We reviewed data from 52 patients with sustained monomorphic VT and left ventricular disease referred for ICD implantation. ATP was delivered exclusively at the right ventricular apex. The clinical VTs site of origin (basal, midventricular, or apical) was determined in each patient, using 12-lead electrocardiogram. VTs episodes treated with ATP during the 1-year follow-up were studied. ATP success rate (%), defined as the ratio between the number of successful ATP sequences and the number of delivered ATP sequences, was determined in each patient. RESULTS: VT exit site was apical in 19 patients (36%), basal in 18 patients (35%), and midventricular in 15 patients (29%). In those 52 patients, 1,393 ATP sequences, delivered to treat 761 VT episodes, were analyzed. ATP success rate was found to be associated with the VT site of origin (median [interquartile range]): basal (33%[11-67]), midventricular (50%[37-100]), apical (100%[41-100]) (P = 0.027). Multivariate analysis identified basal VT site of origin as an independent predictor of ATP failure (P = 0.023). CONCLUSION: ATP is less effective in ICD patients who had basal VT than in those who had apical VT before ICD implantation.

Predictors of poor blood pressure control assessed by 24 hour monitoring in patients with type B acute aortic dissection.

UNLABELLED: The chronic management of post-acute aortic dissection (AD) of the descending aorta (Type B) is based on optimal control of blood pressure (BP), with a target BP < 135/80 mmHg. The aim of our study was to determine and verify effective blood pressure control with an objective measurement method and to identify predicting factors. METHODS: We collected data from 26 patients hospitalized in the acute phase of a Type B AD between 2006 and 2009. Two groups were defined according to 24 hour BP monitoring results at follow-up. Group 1 consisted of patients with a controlled BP (<130/80 mmHg), and Group 2 consisted of patients with an uncontrolled BP. RESULTS: Thirty four percent of patients showed an uncontrolled BP at checkup. Vascular history before AD (P = 0.06), high baseline BP trend (P = 0.01 for systolic and P = 0.08 for diastolic), and greater diameter of the descending aorta (P = 0.02) were associated with poor BP control. CONCLUSION: Prognosis after AD is associated with BP control. Therefore, 24 hour BP monitoring can be made.