Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 9: 222, 2009 Dec 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19961588

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although primary care should be the cornerstone of medical practice, inappropriate use of urgent care for non-urgent patients is a growing problem that has significant economic and healthcare consequences. The characteristics of patients who choose the urgent care setting, as well as the reasoning behind their decisions, is not well established. The purpose of this study was to determine the motivation behind, and characteristics of, adult patients who choose to access health care in our urgent care clinic. The relevance of understanding the motivation driving this patient population is especially pertinent given recent trends towards universal healthcare and the unclear impact it may have on the demands of urgent care. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of patients seeking care at an urgent care clinic (UCC) within a large acute care safety-net urban hospital over a six-week period. Survey data included demographics, social and economic information, reasons that patients chose a UCC, previous primary care exposure, reasons for delaying care, and preventive care needs. RESULTS: A total of 1, 006 patients were randomly surveyed. Twenty-five percent of patients identified Spanish as their preferred language. Fifty-four percent of patients reported choosing the UCC due to not having to make an appointment, 51.2% because it was convenient, 43.9% because of same day test results, 42.7% because of ability to get same-day medications and 15.1% because co-payment was not mandatory. Lack of a regular physician was reported by 67.9% of patients and 57.2% lacked a regular source of care. Patients reported delaying access to care for a variety of reasons. CONCLUSION: Despite a common belief that patients seek care in the urgent care setting primarily for economic reasons, this study suggests that patients choose the urgent care setting based largely on convenience and more timely care. This information is especially applicable to the potential increase in urgent care volume in a universal healthcare system. Additionally, this study adds to the body of literature supporting the important role of timely primary care in healthcare maintenance.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Servicios Urbanos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Factores Socioeconómicos , Población Urbana
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 43(6): 629-34, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25816692

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This was a feasibility study in a Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center to develop a standard operating procedure (SOP) to be used by health care workers to disinfect reusable elastomeric respirators under pandemic conditions. Registered and licensed practical nurses, nurse practitioners, aides, clinical technicians, and physicians took part in the study. METHODS: Health care worker volunteers were provided with manufacturers' cleaning and disinfection instructions and all necessary supplies. They were observed and filmed. SOPs were developed, based on these observations, and tested on naïve volunteer health care workers. Error rates using manufacturers' instructions and SOPs were compared. RESULTS: When using respirator manufacturers' cleaning and disinfection instructions, without specific training or supervision, all subjects made multiple errors. When using the SOPs developed in the study, without specific training or guidance, naïve health care workers disinfected respirators with zero errors. CONCLUSION: Reusable facial protective equipment may be disinfected by health care workers with minimal training using SOPs.


Asunto(s)
Desinfección/normas , Equipo Reutilizado/normas , Personal de Salud , Dispositivos de Protección Respiratoria/normas , Desinfección/métodos , Elastómeros , Contaminación de Equipos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Errores Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estándares de Referencia , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
3.
J Infect ; 71(6): 649-57, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26335708

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to define the nasal microbiome of hospital inpatients who are persistently colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) compared with matched, non-colonized controls. METHODS: Twenty-six persistently MRSA-colonized subjects and 26 matched non-colonized controls were selected from the screening records of the infection control program at the Department of the Veteran Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System (VA-ECHCS). The nasal microbiotas were analyzed with PCR amplification and sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene. Comparison of all variables across the groups was performed using stratified logistic regression to account for the one-to-one matching. Canonical discriminant analysis was performed to assess differences in bacterial community across the two groups. Competing organisms were cocultured with MRSA in vitro. RESULTS: There was a negative association between MRSA colonization and colonization with Streptococcus spp. At the species level, multivariate analysis demonstrated a statistically significant negative association between colonization with Streptococcus mitis or Lactobacillus gasseri and MRSA. Coculture experiments revealed in vitro competition between S. mitis and all of the 22 MRSA strains isolated from subjects. Competition was blocked by addition of catalase to the media. Persistently colonized subjects had lesser microbial diversity than the non-colonized controls. CONCLUSION: In a high-risk inpatient setting, bacterial competition in the nasal niche protects some patients from MRSA colonization.


Asunto(s)
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/fisiología , Microbiota , Nariz/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Adulto , Antibiosis , Portador Sano , Catalasa/metabolismo , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Lactobacillus/efectos de los fármacos , Lactobacillus/aislamiento & purificación , Lactobacillus/fisiología , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/genética , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , ARN Ribosómico 16S , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Staphylococcus aureus/fisiología , Streptococcus mitis/aislamiento & purificación , Streptococcus mitis/fisiología
4.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 62(9): 1764-71, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25112175

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the postoperative administration of tryptophan would be beneficial for elderly adults undergoing surgery who are at risk of developing postoperative delirium. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 60 and older undergoing major elective operations requiring a postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission (n = 325). INTERVENTION: L-tryptophan, 1 g orally three times a day or placebo was started after surgery and continued for up to 3 days postoperatively. MEASUREMENTS: Delirium and its motor subtypes were measured using the Confusion Assessment Method-Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) and the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale. The primary outcome for between-group comparison was the incidence of excitatory (mixed and hyperactive) postoperative delirium. The secondary outcomes for comparison were the incidence and duration of overall postoperative delirium. RESULTS: The overall incidence of postoperative delirium was 39% (95% confidence interval = 34-44%) (n = 116). Seventeen percent of participants in the tryptophan group and 9% in the placebo group had excitatory delirium (P = .18), and the duration of excitatory delirium was 3.3 ± 1.7 days for tryptophan and 3.1 ± 1.9 days for placebo (P = .74). Forty percent of participants in the tryptophan group and 37% in the placebo group had overall delirium (P = .60), and the duration of overall delirium was 2.9 ± 1.8 days for tryptophan and 2.4 ± 1.6 days for placebo (P = .17). CONCLUSION: Postoperative tryptophan supplementation in older adults undergoing major elective operations requiring postoperative ICU admission did not reduce the incidence or duration of postoperative excitatory delirium or overall delirium.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos de Segunda Generación/uso terapéutico , Delirio/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Triptófano/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Delirio/sangre , Delirio/diagnóstico , Método Doble Ciego , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Melatonina/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Serotonina/sangre , Triptófano/sangre
5.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 64(17): 1825-36, 2014 Oct 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25443706

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Stenosis of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is common and often requires percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for treatment. However, data for the effectiveness of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in SVG-PCI are unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the association between DES versus BMS used during SVG PCI and clinical outcomes in the national Veterans Affairs integrated healthcare system. METHODS: We studied a national cohort of 2,471 post-CABG veterans undergoing SVG-PCI between 2008 and 2011 at all Veterans Affairs hospitals and compared clinical outcomes of between those receiving DES and BMS. Clinical outcomes included procedural complications, myocardial infarction (MI), and all-cause mortality. Comparisons were made in a propensity-matched cohort using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: DES were used in 1,549 SVG-PCI patients (63%) and the use of DES increased progressively with each calendar year (50% in 2008 to 69% in 2011). Incidence of procedural complications was low and comparable in both groups (2.8% among BMS vs. 2.3% among DES patients; p = 0.54). During long-term (>2 years) follow-up, use of DES was associated with lower mortality than BMS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57 to 0.89) and similar rates of MI (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.71 to 1.24) in the propensity-matched cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In a national cohort of veterans, we observed widespread and increasing use of DES during SVG-PCI. In long-term follow-up, compared with BMS, DES use was safe and effective in SVG-PCI patients.


Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria/métodos , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Vena Safena/trasplante , Stents , Anciano , Bioprótesis/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA