Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Allergy ; 78(10): 2684-2697, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37394895

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab is an anti-T2-inflammatory biological registered for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), indicated by integrated CRS-care pathways when optimal medico-surgical treatment yields insufficient CRS control. This study aims to evaluate long-term results with focus on established therapeutic efficacy while tapering dupilumab. METHODS: Real-life, prospective observational cohort study in single tertiary referral center with add-on dupilumab as primary biological treatment in adult (≥18 years) biological-naïve CRSwNP patients per the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS)2020-indication with a 2-year follow-up. Tapering (increasing interdose interval) applied every 24 weeks, conditional to sufficient treatment response and CRS control. RESULTS: Mean scores (s.d.) of all co-primary outcomes improved significantly from baseline ( 228) to the 48 ( 214) and 96-weeks ( 99) timepoints: Nasal Polyp Score (0-8) improved from 5,3 (1,9) to 1,4 (1,8) and 1,3 (1,7); SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22 (0-110) improved from 53,6 (19,6) to 20,2 (15,4) and 21,2 (15,6); Sniffin'Sticks-12 identification test (0-12; 0-6 anosmia, 7-10 hyposmia, 11-12 normosmia) improved from 3,7 (2,4) to 7,7 (2,9) and 7,3 (3,04); Asthma Control Test (5-25; >19 indicating well-controlled asthma) improved from 18,5 (4,8) to 21,8 (3,8) and 21,4 (3,9). Tapering was feasible in 79,5% of the patients at the 24-weeks timepoint, and in 93,7% and 95,8% at the 48- and 96-weeks timepoints, respectively. One-way repeated-measures ANOVA demonstrated no significant alterations of individual co-primary outcome mean-scores from 24 weeks onward. CONCLUSION: This first long-term real-life prospective observational cohort study shows high therapeutic efficacy of dupilumab for severe CRswNP in the first 2 years. Therapeutic efficacy is principally established within 24 weeks and endures while tapering dupilumab conditional to treatment response and CRS control.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Pólipos Nasales , Rinitis , Sinusitis , Adulto , Humanos , Pólipos Nasales/complicaciones , Pólipos Nasales/tratamiento farmacológico , Rinitis/complicaciones , Rinitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedad Crónica , Sinusitis/complicaciones , Sinusitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida
3.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep ; 14(4): 427, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24557748

RESUMEN

Meta-analysis of both large outcome studies as well as cohort studies support the safety and efficacy of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis. The efficacy of endoscopic sinus surgery is demonstrated in the improvement of both disease-specific and generic QOL as well as objective measures. However, this must be interpreted together with a well-recognized long-term 15-20 % revision rate, seen more often in patients with ASA trias and cystic fibrosis as well as osteitis and previous surgery. The effect of surgery is higher in managing nasal obstruction (effect size 1.7) and less so hyposmia (effect size 0.8). Allergy has an additive role on the symptomatology of CRS; however, its role if any on the outcome of ESS for CRS is unclear. The concurrent presence of aspiring sensitivity and asthma is associated with increased disease burden and more revision surgeries. Improved phenotyping of CRS may lead in the future to better tailoring of surgical treatments.


Asunto(s)
Pólipos Nasales/cirugía , Senos Paranasales/cirugía , Rinitis/cirugía , Sinusitis/cirugía , Enfermedad Crónica , Endoscopía , Humanos , Pólipos Nasales/complicaciones , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Rinitis/complicaciones , Sinusitis/complicaciones
4.
Lancet Respir Med ; 10(4): 337-346, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35012708

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is a common operation for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) when medical therapy alone is insufficient. No randomised controlled trials on the efficacy of ESS have been published. We aimed to assess the efficacy of ESS plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in patients with CRSwNP. METHODS: We performed an open-label, multicentre, pragmatic, randomised, controlled trial in three tertiary care centres and 12 secondary care centres in 11 cities in the Netherlands (Almere, Amstelveen, Amsterdam, Blaricum, Den Haag, Deventer, Haarlem, Hoofddorp, Hoorn, Leiderdorp, and Rotterdam). Adults (aged ≥18 years) with CRSwNP and an indication for ESS were randomly assigned (1:1) using block randomisation (block sizes of six), stratified by study centre, to receive either ESS plus medical therapy or medical therapy. ESS was performed according to local practice, although anterior ethmoidectomy was mandatory. Medical therapy was prescribed at the patient's otorhinolaryngologist's discretion, and could be, but was not limited to, nasal corticosteroids, nasal rinsing, systemic corticosteroids, or systemic antibiotics. The primary outcome was disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 12 months of follow up, measured with the validated Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22; where each item is scored from 0 to 5, where 0 indicated no problems and 5 indicates problems as bad as can be, with a total score of 0-110 points), and the minimal clinically important difference of the SNOT-22 is 9·0 points. Primary and safety analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis. The ITT population comprised all patients who were randomly assigned to treatment according to their randomisation group and without any protocol violation. This study is registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, NTR4978, and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Feb 15, 2015, and Aug 27, 2019, 371 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 238 were eligible, willing to participate, and randomly assigned to ESS plus medical therapy (n=121) or medical therapy (n=117) and 234 were included in the baseline ITT population (n=118 ESS plus medical therapy; n=116 medical therapy). 142 (61%) of 234 patients at baseline were men and 92 (39%) were women, and the mean age was 50·4 years (SD 12·7). 206 participants were analysed at 12 months for the primary outcome (n=103 in the ESS plus medical therapy group; n=103 in the medical therapy group). At 12 months follow-up, the mean SNOT-22 score in the ESS plus medical therapy group was 27·9 (SD 20·2; n=103) and in the medical therapy group was 31·1 (20·4; n=103), with an adjusted mean difference of -4·9 (95% CI -9·4 to -0·4), favouring ESS plus medical therapy. Adverse events were similar between the groups. The most common adverse events were minor epistaxis or gastrointestinal problems. No treatment-related deaths occurred, but one patient died due to congestive heart failure. INTERPRETATION: ESS plus medical therapy is more efficacious than medical therapy alone in patients with CRSwNP, although the minimal clinically important difference was not met. Long-term follow-up data are needed to determine whether the effect persists. The current results are a basis for further development of evidence-based guidelines. FUNDING: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw).


Asunto(s)
Pólipos Nasales , Sinusitis , Adolescente , Adulto , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pólipos Nasales/complicaciones , Pólipos Nasales/tratamiento farmacológico , Pólipos Nasales/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Sinusitis/complicaciones , Sinusitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20182018 Apr 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29666080

RESUMEN

In this report, we describe the case of a young, diabetic girl with ketoacidosis who suffered sudden loss of vision of the right eye. The loss of vision was caused by an invasive rhino-orbital-cerebral fungal infection (mucormycosis) with extensive periorbital thrombosis. Despite maximal antifungal and surgical treatment (including exenteration of the right orbit), the clinical situation deteriorated. It was only after overcoming the difficulties of managing her hyperglycaemia that the patient's condition stabilised and her life was saved. Another factor contributing to this girls' survival was the swift diagnosis of mucormycosis, which was made soon after the onset of symptoms. Because of this, treatment could be started almost immediately.


Asunto(s)
Ceguera/etiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/complicaciones , Mucormicosis/complicaciones , Procedimientos Quírurgicos Nasales , Enfermedades Orbitales/microbiología , Enfermedades de los Senos Paranasales/microbiología , Adolescente , Anfotericina B/administración & dosificación , Antifúngicos/administración & dosificación , Ceguera/fisiopatología , Ceguera/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/fisiopatología , Cetoacidosis Diabética/complicaciones , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/fisiopatología , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Mucormicosis/fisiopatología , Mucormicosis/terapia , Enfermedades Orbitales/terapia , Enfermedades de los Senos Paranasales/terapia , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 7(8): 813-820, 2017 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28558147

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Postoperative wound healing after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an important factor in procedural success. Local steroids and separation of opposing mucosa are commonly implemented to optimize healing. A bioabsorbable, fluticasone propionate (FP)-eluting implant, SinuBand FP, was assessed for its safety and efficacy when used in patients with CRS and nasal polyps, who were indicated for ESS including bilateral anterior and posterior ethmoidectomy. METHODS: A first-in-human, randomized, partially double-blind, single-tertiary-referral-center, controlled trial enrolling 30 patients receiving 2 of 3 treatments (1 per sinus, intrapatient control): SinuBand FP, SinuBand (without FP), or standard nasal pack (Merocel®). Primary outcome measures were local safety, ocular safety (intraocular pressure [IOP], lens opacity), and 24-hour urine cortisol. Secondary measures (evaluated by independent review of postoperative video endoscopies) were ethmoid inflammation, polyp score, adhesion formation, and Lund-Kennedy score. Patient-reported outcomes of postoperative pain, nasal congestion, and nasal discharge were collected. RESULTS: Of 30 enrolled patients (used for safety analysis), 27 patients completed the trial. SinuBand FP showed local safety, ocular safety, and no significant change in 24-hour urine cortisol. SinuBand FP showed a trend to do better concerning inflammation. Concerning polyp score SinuBand FP did significantly better compared to Merocel (p = 0.03). No significance compared to SinuBand without corticosteroids (p = 0.97). Adhesions were comparable across treatments. Patient reported pain was nominally lower in the SinuBand group. CONCLUSION: SinuBand FP was well tolerated and showed evidence of efficacy. A larger study is needed to further evaluate and confirm the benefits of SinuBand FP.


Asunto(s)
Implantes Absorbibles , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Implantes de Medicamentos/administración & dosificación , Fluticasona/administración & dosificación , Procedimientos Quírurgicos Nasales , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Método Doble Ciego , Endoscopía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Senos Paranasales/efectos de los fármacos , Senos Paranasales/cirugía , Periodo Posoperatorio , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
7.
Laryngoscope ; 126(2): 322-8, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26344930

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: We report on the treatment outcome of endoscopically managed sinonasal inverted papilloma, focusing on revision cases. Our aim was to identify the properties of revision cases that affect treatment outcome by comparing them to primary cases in a single center. We propose using 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the postoperative management of inverted papilloma. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective single-center case series. This study met the criteria for approval by the local medical ethics committee. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review identifying patients operated on between January 2003 and September 2013. Data were collected about patient demographics, symptoms, tumor attachment site, imaging, intraoperative and pathological findings, surgical approaches, postoperative treatment, follow-up, and recurrence. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one (72 revision and 49 primary) cases were retrieved with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Revision cases have significantly higher Krouse staging (P = 0.003), different distribution of tumor attachment sites, and higher recurrence rates. The recurrence rate was 4.1% for primary cases (mean follow-up 35.5 months) and 18.1% for revision cases (mean follow-up 45 months). Eight of the recurrent cases recurred within the first year. 5-fluorouracil was applied postoperatively in 18 (5 primary and 13 revision) cases, which included one (5.6%) recurrence and one minor complication (transient periorbital swelling). CONCLUSION: The most important factors in preventing the recurrence of inverted papilloma are the determination of the location of the attachment and the completeness of resection in the primary endoscopic surgery. Revision cases have a higher recurrence rate, and the attachment sites are surgically more challenging. The use of 5-FU might have a place in the postoperative treatment of surgically challenging inverted papilloma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.


Asunto(s)
Manejo de la Enfermedad , Endoscopía/métodos , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/métodos , Papiloma Invertido/cirugía , Neoplasias de los Senos Paranasales/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Papiloma Invertido/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de los Senos Paranasales/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 14(17): 2351-60, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24050707

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an inflammatory disease of the nasal and paranasal mucosa with great impact on quality of life and a large financial burden on society. This article provides an overview of its current and future pharmacotherapy, the mainstay of CRS treatment. AREAS COVERED: This article reviews the etiology, antibiotic and corticosteroid treatment, nasal irrigation therapy, bacterial lysates, anti-immunoglobulin E and anti-interleukin-5 therapy of CRS. This review highlights articles of interest on these topics in the PubMed database. Studies not in English language were excluded. EXPERT OPINION: CRS is a spectrum of disease characterized by mucosal inflammation. Defining its various subtypes will change its medical treatment from general anti-inflammatory medicine towards tailor-made pharmacotherapy. The optimal timing of endoscopic sinus surgery in this treatment process remains to be defined.


Asunto(s)
Rinitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sinusitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Lavado Nasal (Proceso) , Rinitis/etiología , Sinusitis/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA