Anatomic versus non-anatomic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma-A European multicentre cohort study in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing in the western world over the past decades. As liver resection (LR) represents one of the most efficient treatment options, advantages of anatomic (ALR) versus non-anatomic liver resection (NALR) show a lack of consistent evidence. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate complications and survival rates after both resection types. METHODS: This is a multicentre cohort study using retrospectively and prospectively collected data. We included all patients undergoing LR for HCC between 2009 and 2020 from three specialised centres in Switzerland and Germany. Complication and survival rates after ALR versus NALR were analysed using uni- and multivariate Cox regression models. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-eight patients were included. Median follow-up time was 52.76 months. 164/298 patients (55%) underwent ALR. Significantly more patients with cirrhosis received NALR (n = 94/134; p < 0.001). Complications according to the Clavien Dindo classification were significantly more frequent in the NALR group (p < 0.001). Liver failure occurred in 13% after ALR versus 8% after NALR (p < 0.215). Uni- and multivariate cox regression models showed no significant differences between the groups for recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Furthermore, cirrhosis had no significant impact on OS and RFS. CONCLUSION: No significant differences on RFS and OS rates could be observed. Post-operative complications were significantly less frequent in the ALR group while liver specific complications were comparable between both groups. Subgroup analysis showed no significant influence of cirrhosis on the post-operative outcome of these patients.

Extent of resection and underlying liver disease influence the accuracy of the preoperative risk assessment with the American College of Surgeons Risk Calculator.

BACKGROUND: Liver surgery is associated with a significant risk of postoperative complications, depending on the extent of liver resection and the underlying liver disease. Therefore, adequate patient selection is crucial. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the American College of Surgeons Risk Calculator (ACS-RC) by considering liver parenchyma quality and the type of liver resection. METHODS: Patients who underwent open or minimally invasive liver resection for benign or malignant indications between January 2019 and March 2023 at the University Hospital Basel were included. Brier score and feature importance analysis were performed to investigate the accuracy of the ACS-RC. RESULTS: A total of 376 patients were included in the study, 214 (57%) who underwent partial hepatectomy, 89 (24%) who underwent hemihepatectomy, and 73 (19%) who underwent trisegmentectomy. Most patients had underlying liver diseases, with 143 (38%) patients having fibrosis, 75 patients (20%) having steatosis, and 61 patients (16%) having cirrhosis. The ACS-RC adequately predicted surgical site infection (Brier score of 0.035), urinary tract infection (Brier score of 0.038), and death (Brier score of 0.046), and moderate accuracy was achieved for serious complications (Brier score of 0.216) and overall complications (Brier score of 0.180). Compared with the overall cohort, the prediction was limited in patients with cirrhosis, fibrosis, and steatosis and in those who underwent hemihepatectomy and trisegmentectomy. The inclusion of liver parenchyma quality improved the prediction accuracy. CONCLUSION: The ACS-RC is a reliable tool for estimating 30-day postoperative morbidity, particularly for patients with healthy liver parenchyma undergoing partial liver resection. However, accurate perioperative risk prediction should be adjusted for underlying liver disease and extended liver resections.

Impact of Positive Lymph Nodes after Systematic Perihilar Lymphadenectomy in Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Background: 25 to 50% of patients suffering from colorectal cancer develop liver metastases. The incidence of regional lymph node (LN) metastases within the liver is up to 14%. The need for perihilar lymph node dissection (LND) is still a controversial topic in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This study investigates the role of perihilar LND in patients with CRLM. Methods: For this retrospective study, patients undergoing surgery for CRLM at the University Hospital Basel between May 2009 and December 2021 were included. In patients with perihilar LND, LN were stained for CK22 and examined for single tumour cells (<0.2 mm), micro- (0.2-2 mm), and macro-metastases (>2 mm). Results: 112 patients undergoing surgery for CRLM were included. 54 patients underwent LND, 58/112 underwent liver resection only (LR). 3/54 (5.6%) showed perihilar LN metastases in preoperative imaging, and in 10/54 (18.5%), micro-metastases could be proven after CK22 staining. Overall complications were similar in both groups (LND: 46, 85.2%; LR: 48, 79.3%; p = 0.800). The rate of major complications was higher in the LND group (LND: 22, 40.7%; LR: 18, 31%, p = 0.002). Median recurrence-free survival (RFS) (LND: 10 months; LR: 15 months, p = 0.076) and overall survival (OS) were similar (LND: 49 months; LR: 60 months, p = 0.959). Conclusion: Preoperative imaging is not sensitive enough to detect perihilar LN metastases. Perihilar LND enables precise tumour staging by detecting more lymph node metastases, especially through CK22 staining. However, perihilar LND does not influence oncologic outcomes in patients with CRLM.