Glioblastoma in the elderly: the effect of aggressive and modern therapies on survival.

OBJECTIVE: The prognosis of elderly patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is universally poor. Currently, few studies have examined postoperative outcomes and the effects of various modern therapies such as bevacizumab on survival in this patient population. In this study, the authors evaluated the effects of various factors on overall survival in a cohort of elderly patients with newly diagnosed GBM. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) with newly diagnosed GBM treated between 2004 and 2010. Various characteristics were evaluated in univariate and multivariate stepwise models to examine their effects on complication risk and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were included in the study. The median age was 71 years, and sex was distributed evenly. Patients had a median Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score of 80 and a median of 2 neurological symptoms on presentation. The majority (53.3%) of the patients did not have any comorbidities. Tumors most frequently (43.3%) involved the temporal lobe, followed by the parietal (35.8%), frontal (32.5%), and occipital (15.8%) regions. The majority (57.5%) of the tumors involved eloquent structures. The median tumor size was 4.3 cm. Every patient underwent resection, and 63.3% underwent gross-total resection (GTR). The vast majority (97.3%) of the patients received the postoperative standard of care consisting of radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide. The majority (59.3%) of patients received additional agents, most commonly consisting of bevacizumab (38.9%). The median survival for all patients was 12.0 months; 26.7% of patients experienced long-term (≥ 2-year) survival. The extent of resection was seen to significantly affect overall survival; patients who underwent GTR had a median survival of 14.1 months, whereas those who underwent subtotal resection had a survival of 9.6 months (p = 0.038). Examination of chemotherapeutic effects revealed that the use of bevacizumab compared with no bevacizumab (20.1 vs 7.9 months, respectively; p < 0.0001) and irinotecan compared with no irinotecan (18.0 vs 9.7 months, respectively; p = 0.027) significantly improved survival. Multivariate stepwise analysis revealed that older age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06 [95% CI1.02-1.10]; p = 0.0077), a higher KPS score (HR 0.97 [95% CI 0.95-0.99]; p = 0.0082), and the use of bevacizumab (HR 0.51 [95% CI 0.31-0.83]; p = 0.0067) to be significantly associated with survival. CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated that GTR confers a modest survival benefit on elderly patients with GBM, suggesting that safe maximal resection is warranted. In addition, bevacizumab significantly increased the overall survival of these elderly patients with GBM; older age and preoperative KPS score also were significant prognostic factors. Although elderly patients with GBM have a poor prognosis, they may experience enhanced survival after the administration of the standard of care and the use of additional chemotherapeutics such as bevacizumab.

Thickness of subcutaneous fat as a risk factor for infection in cervical spine fusion surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections increase the incidence of morbidity and mortality as well as health-care expenses. The cost of care increases threefold to fourfold as a consequence of surgical site infection after spinal surgery. The aim of the present study was to determine the role of subcutaneous fat thickness in the development of surgical site infection following cervical spine fusion surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a consecutive cohort of 213 adult patients who underwent posterior cervical spine fusion between 2006 and 2008 at Duke University Medical Center. The horizontal distance from the lamina to the skin surface at the C5 level and the thickness of subcutaneous fat were measured, and the ratio of the fat thickness to the total distance at the surgical site was determined. Previously identified risk factors for the development of surgical site infection were also recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-two of the 213 patients developed a postoperative infection. Obesity (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2) was not a significant risk factor for surgical site infection; the body mass index (and 95% confidence interval) was 29.4 ± 1.2 kg/m2 in the patients who developed a surgical site infection compared with 28.9 ± 0.94 kg/m2 in the patients without an infection. However, the thickness of subcutaneous fat and the ratio of the fat thickness to the lamina-to-skin distance were both significant risk factors for infection. The thickness of subcutaneous fat was 27.0 ± 2.5 mm in the patients who developed a surgical site infection group compared with 21.4 ± 0.88 mm in the patients without an infection (p = 0.042). The ratio of fat thickness to total thickness was 0.42 ± 0.019 in the patients who developed a surgical site infection compared with 0.35 ± 0.01 in the patients without an infection (p = 0.020). Multivariate analysis revealed this ratio to be an independent risk factor for developing a postoperative infection (odds ratio, 3.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 9.97). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that the thickness of subcutaneous fat at the surgical site is a factor in the development of surgical site infection following cervical spine fusion and deserves assessment in the preoperative evaluation.

2012 Young Investigator Award winner: The distribution of body mass as a significant risk factor for lumbar spinal fusion postoperative infections.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the role in body habitus and weight distribution on developing a surgical site infection (SSI). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SSI after lumbar spine surgery remains a significant cause of morbidity. The literature demonstrates an increased risk of postoperative infections associated with obesity, diabetes, and multilevel surgeries. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on a consecutive cohort of 298 adult patients who underwent lumbar spine fusion surgeries between 2006 and 2008 at the Duke University Medical Center. Previously identified risk factors (i.e., number of levels, diabetes, body mass index [BMI]) were collected, as well as the horizontal distance from the lamina to the skin surface (measured at L4) and thickness of subcutaneous fat at the surgical site. RESULTS: Among the 298 patients, 24 (8%) had postoperative infections. Of the previously identified risk factors, number of levels (P = 0.0078) was found to be significantly associated with infections, whereas BMI (P = 0.16) and diabetes (P = 0.13) were found not to be statistically significant. Obesity (BMI ≥30) (P = 0.025), skin to lamina distance (P = 0.046), and thickness of the subcutaneous fat (P = 0.035) were found to be significant risk factors for SSI. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that in obese patients, the distribution of body mass is more predictive of SSI than the absolute BMI and deserves attention in preoperative evaluation.