RECORD-2: phase II randomized study of everolimus and bevacizumab versus interferon α-2a and bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The open-label, phase II RECORD-2 trial compared efficacy and safety of first-line everolimus plus bevacizumab (EVE/BEV) with interferon plus bevacizumab (IFN/BEV) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated patients were randomized 1:1 to bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks with either everolimus 10 mg/day (EVE/BEV) or interferon (9 MIU 3 times/week, if tolerated) (IFN/BEV). Tumor assessments occurred every 12 weeks. The primary objective was the assessment of treatment effect on progression-free survival (PFS), based on an estimate of the chance of a subsequent phase III trial success (50% threshold for phase II success). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were balanced between the EVE/BEV (n = 182) and IFN/BEV (n = 183) arms. The median PFS was 9.3 and 10.0 months in the EVE/BEV and IFN/BEV arms, respectively (P = 0.485). The predicted probability of phase III success was 5.05% (hazard ratio = 0.91; 95% confidence interval 0.69-1.19). The median duration of exposure was 8.5 and 8.3 months for EVE/BEV and IFN/BEV, respectively. The percentage of patients discontinuing because of adverse events (AEs) was 23.4% for EVE/BEV and 26.9% for IFN/BEV. Common grade 3/4 AEs included proteinuria (24.4%), stomatitis (10.6%), and anemia (10.6%) for EVE/BEV and fatigue (17.1%), asthenia (14.4%), and proteinuria (10.5%) for IFN/BEV. The median overall survival was 27.1 months in both arms. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of EVE/BEV and IFN/BEV appears similar. No new or unexpected safety findings were identified and, with the exception of proteinuria in about one-fourth of the population, EVE/BEV was generally well tolerated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY AND TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00719264.

A randomized, controlled phase III trial of nab-Paclitaxel versus dacarbazine in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel versus dacarbazine in patients with metastatic melanoma was evaluated in a phase III randomized, controlled trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage IV melanoma received nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks or dacarbazine 1000 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent radiologic review; the secondary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 529 patients were randomized to nab-paclitaxel (n = 264) or dacarbazine (n = 265). Baseline characteristics were well balanced. The majority of patients were men (66%), had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status of 0 (71%), and had M1c stage disease (65%). The median PFS (primary end point) was 4.8 months with nab-paclitaxel and 2.5 months with dacarbazine [hazard ratio (HR), 0.792; 95.1% confidence interval (CI) 0.631-0.992; P = 0.044]. The median OS was 12.6 months with nab-paclitaxel and 10.5 months with dacarbazine (HR, 0.897; 95.1% CI 0.738-1.089; P = 0.271). Independently assessed overall response rate was 15% versus 11% (P = 0.239), and disease control rate (DCR) was 39% versus 27% (P = 0.004) for nab-paclitaxel versus dacarbazine, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were neuropathy (nab-paclitaxel, 25% versus dacarbazine, 0%; P < 0.001), and neutropenia (nab-paclitaxel, 20% versus dacarbazine, 10%; P = 0.004). There was no correlation between secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) status and PFS in either treatment arm. CONCLUSIONS: nab-Paclitaxel significantly improved PFS and DCR compared with dacarbazine, with a manageable safety profile.

High-dose interferon alfa-2b does not diminish antibody response to GM2 vaccination in patients with resected melanoma: results of the Multicenter Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Phase II Trial E2696.

PURPOSE: High-dose interferon alfa-2b (IFNalpha2b) is the only established adjuvant therapy of resectable high-risk melanoma. GM2-KLH/QS-21 (GMK) is a chemically defined vaccine that is one of the best developed of a range of vaccine candidates for melanoma. A single-institution phase III trial conducted at Memorial Hospital served as the impetus for an intergroup adjuvant E1694/S9512/C509801 trial, which recently completed enrollment of 880 patients. To build on the apparent benefit of IFNalpha2b in resectable high-risk American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage IIB or III melanoma, this phase II study was designed to evaluate the combination of GMK and IFNalpha2b. The E2696 trial was undertaken to evaluate the toxicity and other effects of the established adjuvant high-dose IFNalpha2b regimen in relation to immune responses to GMK and to evaluate the potential clinical and immunologic effects of the combined therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This trial enrolled 107 patients with resectable high- or very high-risk melanoma (AJCC stages IIB, III, and IV). RESULTS: The results demonstrate that IFNalpha2b does not significantly inhibit immunoglobulin M or G serologic responses to the vaccine and that the combination of high-dose IFNalpha2b and GMK is well tolerated in this patient population. CONCLUSION: Cox analysis of the results of the combination with IFNalpha2b show improvement in the relapse-free survival of patients with very high-risk melanoma (including those with resectable M1 disease).

High-dose interferon alfa-2b significantly prolongs relapse-free and overall survival compared with the GM2-KLH/QS-21 vaccine in patients with resected stage IIB-III melanoma: results of intergroup trial E1694/S9512/C509801.

PURPOSE: Vaccine alternatives to high-dose interferon alfa-2b therapy (HDI), the current standard adjuvant therapy for high-risk melanoma, are of interest because of toxicity associated with HDI. The GM2 ganglioside is a well-defined melanoma antigen, and anti-GM2 antibodies have been associated with improved prognosis. We conducted a prospective, randomized, intergroup trial to evaluate the efficacy of HDI for 1 year versus vaccination with GM2 conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin and administered with QS-21 (GMK) for 96 weeks (weekly x 4 then every 12 weeks x 8). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had resected stage IIB/III melanoma. Patients were stratified by sex and number of positive nodes. Primary end points were relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Eight hundred eighty patients were randomized (440 per treatment group); 774 patients were eligible for efficacy analysis. The trial was closed after interim analysis indicated inferiority of GMK compared with HDI. For eligible patients, HDI provided a statistically significant RFS benefit (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.47, P = .0015) and OS benefit (HR = 1.52, P = .009) for GMK versus HDI. Similar benefit was observed in the intent-to-treat analysis (RFS HR = 1.49; OS HR = 1.38). HDI was associated with a treatment benefit in all subsets of patients with zero to > or = four positive nodes, but the greatest benefit was observed in the node-negative subset (RFS HR = 2.07; OS HR = 2.71 [eligible population]). Antibody responses to GM2 (ie, titers > or = 1:80) at days 29, 85, 365, and 720 were associated with a trend toward improved RFS and OS (P2 = .068 at day 29). CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrated a significant treatment benefit of HDI versus GMK in terms of RFS and OS in melanoma patients at high risk of recurrence.

Phase III multicenter randomized trial of the Dartmouth regimen versus dacarbazine in patients with metastatic melanoma.

PURPOSE: Several single-institution phase II trials have reported that the Dartmouth regimen (dacarbazine, cisplatin, carmustine, and tamoxifen) can induce major tumor responses in 40% to 50% of stage IV melanoma patients. This study was designed to compare the overall survival time, rate of objective tumor response, and toxicity of the Dartmouth regimen with standard dacarbazine treatment in stage IV melanoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter phase III trial, 240 patients with measurable stage IV melanoma were randomized to receive the Dartmouth regimen (dacarbazine 220 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) days 1 to 3, carmustine 150 mg/m(2) day 1 every other cycle, and tamoxifen 10 mg orally bid) or dacarbazine 1, 000 mg/m(2). Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Patients were observed for tumor response, survival time, and toxicity. RESULTS: Median survival time from randomization was 7 months; 25% of the patients survived > or = 1 year. There was no difference in survival time between the two treatment arms when analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis or when only the 231 patients who were both eligible and had received treatment were considered. Tumor response was assessable in 226 patients. The response rate to dacarbazine was 10.2% compared with 18.5% for the Dartmouth regimen (P =.09). Bone marrow suppression, nausea/vomiting, and fatigue were significantly more common in the Dartmouth arm. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in survival time and only a small, statistically nonsignificant increase in tumor response for stage IV melanoma patients treated with the Dartmouth regimen compared with dacarbazine. Dacarbazine remains the reference standard treatment for stage IV melanoma.

A Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of temozolomide and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral imidazotetrazinone that is spontaneously converted to 5-(3-methyltriazen-1-yl)imidazole-4-carboxamide (MTIC) at physiological pH. MTIC methylates DNA at the O6 position of guanine, although this lesion may be repaired by the enzyme O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGAT). In this study, TMZ was combined with cisplatin (CDDP), because both agents have single-agent activity against melanoma and other tumor types. Additionally, CDDP has been shown to inactivate AGAT, and subtherapeutic concentrations of CDDP have been shown to increase the sensitivity of leukemic blasts to TMZ. This Phase I study sought to determine the toxicities, recommended dose, and pharmacological profile of the TMZ/CDDP combination. Patients were treated with oral TMZ daily for 5 consecutive days together with CDDP on day 1 (4 h after TMZ) every 4 weeks at the following TMZ (mg/m2/day)/CDDP (mg/m2) dose levels: 100/75, 150/75, 200/75, and 200/100. Plasma samples were obtained on days 1 and 2 to evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters of TMZ alone and in combination with CDDP. Fifteen patients received a total of 44 courses of TMZ/CDDP. The principal toxicities of the regimen consisted of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, and vomiting, which were intolerable in two of six new patients treated at the 200/100 mg/m2 dose level. Of five patients receiving 17 courses at the next lower dose level (200/75 mg/m2), none experienced dose-limiting toxicity. Antitumor activity was observed in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue, and leiomyosarcoma of the uterus. Pharmacokinetic studies of TMZ revealed the following pertinent parameters (mean +/- SD): time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) = 1.1+/-0.6 h (day 1) and 1.7+/-0.9 h (day 2); elimination half-life (t1/2) = 1.74+/-0.22 h (day 1) and 2.35+/-0.70 h (day 2); and clearance (Cl(s)/F) = 115+/-27 ml/min/m2 (day 1) and 141+/-109 ml/min/m2 (day 2). TMZ drug exposure, described by the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCinfinity) and the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), was similar on days 1 and 2. On the basis of these results, the recommended doses for Phase II clinical trials are TMZ 200 mg/m2/day for 5 days with 75 mg/m2 CDDP on day 1, every 4 weeks. The addition of CDDP did not affect the tolerable dose of single-agent TMZ (200 mg/m2/day x 5 days), nor did it substantially alter the pharmacokinetic behavior of TMZ.

Histamine dihydrochloride: inhibiting oxidants and synergising IL-2-mediated immune activation in the tumour microenvironment.

The potential role of histamine in cancer immunotherapy has been a subject of interest for more than a decade. A significant body of research has elucidated the action of histamine in a model system that mimics the tumour microenvironment. In vitro evidence indicates that histamine inhibits the generation and release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by monocytes/macrophages (MO) during respiratory burst. Since ROS have been shown to abrogate peritumoural and intratumoural cytokine activation of natural killer (NK) and T-cells and induce apoptosis of these cells in vitro, inhibition of ROS may enable cytokines to activate NK and T-cells and restore their antineoplastic, cytotoxic capabilities. Experimental data indicate that histamine and interleukin-2 (IL-2) act synergistically to activate NK cell cytotoxicity (NKCC). Although IL-2, a regulator of immune responses, has been shown to promote NKCC in monotherapy for metastatic melanoma (MM), renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), objective responses occur in a minority of patients and survival is not significantly extended, except for a minority of patients with MM using high-dose regimens which have not been widely adopted. In vitro findings suggest that the addition of histamine to IL-2 therapy might improve response rates and disease-free survival by protecting the cells of the immune system from oxidative stress and inducing natural endogenous immune cytotoxicity. An IL-2/histamine Phase III trial is in progress in a population of AML patients. A recently completed Phase III trial of IL-2 vs. IL-2/histamine in patients with MM demonstrated a trend towards a superior survival benefit from IL-2/histamine for all patients entered, and a statistically significant survival benefit for patients with hepatic metastases.

Melanoma: immunotherapeutic approaches.

The incidence of melanoma in the US is rising at a rate second only to that of lung cancer in women. Early stage melanoma is curable, but once metastatic, it is almost uniformly fatal. The immunotherapy of melanoma is a new and exciting therapeutic modality that is being extensively investigated worldwide. Interferon-alpha has an approximately 16% response rate in metastatic melanoma. In the randomised trials to date, no combination of chemotherapeutic or hormonal agent with interferon-alpha has proven to be superior to dacarbazine, the reference agent for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. The role of interferon-alpha-2b in the adjuvant therapy of localised melanoma at high risk for relapse has recently been established, with the results of 2 large randomised trials conducted by the US Intergroup, one showing improvement in both relapse-free survival and overall survival, and the other in relapse-free survival only. Interferon-gamma has not been effective in the adjuvant setting or in metastatic disease, but is part of combination protocols used for regional therapy for extremity melanomas. Interleukin-2 has an overall response rate of 15 to 20% in metastatic melanoma and produces some complete and durable remissions. The US Food and Drug Administration has recently approved the use of high-dose bolus administration of recombinant interleukin-2 for the therapy of metastatic melanoma. Results of combination chemotherapy and immunotherapy regimens containing interleukin-2 (biochemotherapy) are promising, and ongoing research will determine whether a survival impact will be confirmed in randomised studies. Vaccine therapy is another exciting area of research, and clinical trials are ongoing in both metastatic melanoma and as adjuvant therapy. A bewildering array of vaccines (whole cell, carbohydrate and peptide) is available, and it remains to be seen which of these numerous preparations will be most effective. Adjuvant therapy trials with a ganglioside GM2 vaccine and others are ongoing. Numerous peptide vaccines are also being investigated for metastatic melanoma, singly and in combination with other immunotherapeutic agents.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck cancer.

Chemotherapy for head and neck cancer in the adjuvant setting is still experimental at the present time. In general, chemotherapy, given as an adjuvant to surgery and radiation therapy, has not been effective in improving local control or overall survival. Many of the regimens tested would be considered suboptimal by today's standards, and the experimental patient population in these studies have been heterogenous without stringent application of "high-risk" features. Concurrent radiation and chemotherapy seems to be promising and is the focus of ongoing research efforts. The true role of this approach will have to await the completion and analysis of currently active trials, such as the intergroup high-risk adjuvant trial.

Adjuvant interferon treatment for melanoma.

After decades of research, the adjuvant therapy of patients with melanoma has recently shown significant survival and relapse-free interval benefit for the intravenous and subcutaneous administration of maximally tolerable dosages of recombinant IFN alpha 2b in a trial conducted by the ECOG (E1684). Despite the toxicity of this therapy, retrospective analyses of its impact upon quality-of-life using Q-TWiST methods and cost-efficacy analyses all argue for the benefit and utility of this intervention, especially for node-positive patients with resectable melanoma at highest risk of relapse. A confirmatory trial has been completed and will mature in the spring of 1998. The impact of lower dosages of IFN, apparent transiently during and for a period of time following treatment has not been sustained with longer follow-up in a number of trials. Current approaches in Europe and North America focus upon refinement of dose and duration of treatment with IFN and their potential interactions with, and comparison with, active specific immunotherapy with vaccines. A recently emerging area of research is the patient with stage IIA melanoma and the potential role of an abbreviated high-dose regimen of IFN alpha in this patient subset.

Paraneoplastic syndromes.

The paraneoplastic syndromes are effects of cancer that occur at sites remote from the primary tumor and its metastases. Recognition of these disorders is important from both diagnostic and therapeutic viewpoints. The important paraneoplastic syndromes involving the endocrine, nervous, hematologic, and dermatologic systems are discussed in this article.

Evaluation of the combination of vinblastine and quinidine in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. A phase I study.

Quinidine is known to inhibit p-glycoprotein and enhance the activity of vinblastine against cultured renal carcinoma cells. We have combined quinidine and vinblastine in a Phase I trial in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Twenty-three patients were entered. Prior treatment included nephrectomy (15 patients), radiation (1 patient) and interferons (8 patients). Cohorts of patients were treated at one of three quinidine dose levels (100, 200, and 400 mg); one patient received 300 mg. Quinidine was given orally 4 times daily starting 3 days prior to the first dose of vinblastine of 5 mg/m2 intravenously given once a week. Hematologic parameters, EKG, and quinidine levels were monitored weekly. Mean quinidine levels in each dose tier were 1.58, 2.59, and 4.24 micrograms/ml, respectively. The dose-limiting toxicity was leukopenia, which necessitated dose interruptions in 16 patients. The mean nadir WBC count (x 10(9)/L) was 3.47, 2.3, and 1.73 in each dose tier, respectively. Corresponding values for the mean maximum decrease in WBC count from baseline were 3.85, 5.86, and 6.53, respectively. There was a trend for leukopenia to become more severe with increasing doses of quinidine. Other toxicities included mild nausea and vomiting in all patients, and hypotension and paralytic ileus in one patient each. No cardiac toxicity was observed. One patient had a complete remission and 4 patients had stable disease. We conclude that quinidine and vinblastine may be administered together safely in a clinical setting, with leukopenia being dose-limiting. Further studies are needed to determine any therapeutic advantage over vinblastine alone.

Long-term outcomes with concurrent carboplatin, paclitaxel and radiation therapy for locally advanced, inoperable head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Our goal was to evaluate long-term efficacy outcomes of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) treated with carboplatin, paclitaxel (Taxol) and radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a phase II trial in inoperable patients with locally advanced SCCHN. Carboplatin 100 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 40 mg/m(2) were administered i.v. once a week during external beam radiation therapy (180 cGy per fraction) for 6-7 weeks. Interstitial brachytherapy was used as a boost in selected patients with primary malignancies of the oral cavity and the oropharynx. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled. Fifty-two patients (95%) had stage IV and 51 (93%) had technically unresectable disease; 62% had an oropharyngeal primary site. Twenty-one patients underwent brachytherapy boost. Grade 3 or 4 mucositis occurred in 30% of patients. One death occurred during treatment that was related to complications of gastrostomy tube placement. Forty of 50 assessable patients (80%) had an objective response, with a complete response rate of 52%. With a median follow-up of 69 months for surviving patients, the 5-year progression-free survival was 36% and the 5-year overall survival was 35%. Two of the 18 long-term survivors of >50 months were gastrostomy tube feeding dependent. Patients undergoing brachytherapy boost (n = 21) had similar outcomes compared with the rest of the patients. In multivariate analysis, baseline hemoglobin levels and N stage were predictive of survival. CONCLUSION: Treatment with concurrent carboplatin, paclitaxel and radiation is safe and offers curative potential for poor prognosis patients with locally advanced SCCHN.

Update on the role of adjuvant interferon for high risk melanoma.

Major prognostic factors for melanoma include thickness of the primary lesion, ulceration and presence or absence of regional lymph node metastases. These parameters form the basis for the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system and the determination of the appropriateness of post-surgical adjuvant therapy. Among the numerous agents tested for the adjuvant therapy of high-risk melanoma, interferon-alpha 2b (IFN-alpha2b) administered at maximally tolerated doses is the only one to demonstrate an improvement in relapse-free and overall survival for these patients. This high-dose IFN-alpha2b regimen comprising an intensive intravenous induction phase followed by a more prolonged subcutaneously administered phase has now been tested in three, large, randomised trials done through the United States Cooperative Groups, and has shown consistent benefit in preventing relapse and improving survival for patients with thick primary melanomas and those with regional lymph node metastases. The relative importance of the induction component of this treatment regimen is being addressed in an ongoing intergroup trial for intermediate-risk melanoma. Data from completed and ongoing studies using high-dose IFN-alpha for the adjuvant therapy of melanoma are presented.

Potential uses of interferon alpha 2 as adjuvant therapy in cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to provide an overview of the potential uses of adjuvant interferon (IFN) therapy for resected solid tumors at high risk for postsurgical relapse. METHODS: A MEDLINE search (1970-1994) of the English-language literature for original articles, reviews, and abstracts addressing IFN use in the adjuvant setting together with the authors' collective experience formed the basis for this review. RESULTS: The use of adjuvant IFN-alpha has been studied most extensively in conjunction with the treatment of melanoma. Fewer data are available on IFN-alpha use for the treatment of other solid tumors. In melanoma, there is evidence from Intergroup trials (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and World Health Organization) that IFN-alpha 2a given for 1-3 years prolongs the interval to relapse and may have a survival benefit. Trials of adjuvant IFN, with and without chemotherapy, are ongoing in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma and colorectal adenocarcinoma. Its value in the treatment of osteosarcoma and high-grade astrocytoma is unknown. CONCLUSIONS: The use of IFN in the adjuvant setting is an exciting area of medical and surgical oncology and has the potential to prolong the time to relapse and to increase survival of patients with melanoma. Its role in the adjuvant therapy of other solid tumors remains to be defined.

Temozolomide, a novel alkylating agent with activity in the central nervous system, may improve the treatment of advanced metastatic melanoma.

Temozolomide (TMZ) is the first new chemotherapy agent to be approved for the treatment of high-grade malignant gliomas in more than 20 years. This novel oral alkylating agent has demonstrated promising activity not only in brain tumors, but in a variety of solid tumors, including malignant melanoma. TMZ is 100% bioavailable when taken orally and, because of its small size and lipophilic properties, it is able to cross the blood-brain barrier. Concentrations in the central nervous system are approximately 30% of plasma concentrations. Once it has entered the central nervous system, TMZ can be spontaneously converted to the active metabolite. These pharmacologic properties make it an ideal agent for treating central nervous system malignancies. In patients with advanced metastatic melanoma, brain metastases are a major cause of treatment failure. In this setting, TMZ has been shown to be as effective as dacarbazine, with a similar safety profile. More importantly, there is evidence to suggest that TMZ-treated patients have a lower incidence of central nervous system relapse compared with dacarbazine-treated patients. Therefore, TMZ is actively being investigated for the treatment and prevention of brain metastases in melanoma patients. TMZ may become an important part of treatment regimens for advanced metastatic melanoma.

Interferons in the therapy of solid tumors.

Interferons, a group of naturally occurring proteins, possess potent immunological effects. The availability of large amounts of purified interferon through recombinant DNA technology has led to the testing of these agents against a number of tumor types. Interferon-alpha has been the most widely studied. The most encouraging results have been observed in the treatment of melanoma among nonhematological neoplasms, and in the locoregional treatment of other tumor types. It is hoped that further research into the use of the interferons, both singly and in combination with chemotherapy and other immunological agents, will lead to a better elucidation of their therapeutic role against cancer. In this article, the use of interferons in the treatment of solid tumors is reviewed.