Cell-free DNA levels are increased in acute graft-versus-host disease.

BACKGROUND: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and nucleosomes, consisting of cfDNA and histones, are markers of cell activation and damage. In systemic inflammation these markers predict severity and fatality. However, the role of cfDNA in acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (aGvHD), a major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the role of cfDNA as a marker of aGvHD. METHODS: We followed nucleosome levels in 37 allogeneic HSCT patients and an established xenotransplantation mouse model. We determined the origin of cfDNA with a species-specific polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: In the plasma of aGvHD patients, nucleosome levels significantly increased around the time of aGvHD diagnosis compared to pretransplant, concurrently with a significant increase of known aGvHD markers ST2 and REG3α. In mice, we confirmed that nucleosomes were elevated during clinically detectable aGvHD. We found cfDNA to be mainly of human origin and to a lesser extent of mouse origin, indicating that cfDNA is released by (proliferating) human xeno-reactive PBMC and damaged mouse cells. CONCLUSION: We show increased cfDNA both in an aGvHD mouse model and in aGvHD patients. We also demonstrate that donor hematopoietic cells and to a lesser degree (damaged) host cells are the cellular source of cfDNA in aGvHD. We propose that nucleosomes and cfDNA might be an additive marker for aGvHD.

Fetal RHD genotyping after bone marrow transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Fetal RHD genotyping allows targeted diagnostic testing, fetal surveillance, and eventually intrauterine treatment to D-alloimmunized pregnant women who carry an RHD+ fetus. However, false-positive and false-negative results of noninvasive prenatal fetal RHD genotyping have been described due to a variety of causes. In this case report we present two cases where noninvasive fetal RHD typing was complicated by a previous bone marrow transplantation (BMT). CASE REPORT: We describe two women with a history of allogeneic BMT in early childhood. Both were born D+ and received a transplant of their D- male sibling. Anti-D were detected during pregnancy in one of them. The biologic father of this pregnancy was D+. In both cases polymerase chain reaction procedures specific for RHD on maternal plasma DNA were positive whereas a D- neonate was born in one case (Case 1). CONCLUSION: False-positive results of noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping occur in D+ women transplanted with marrow of a D- donor, due to circulating cell-free DNA originating from nonhematopoietic tissue. The cases highlight that health care professionals and laboratories should be aware that allogeneic BMT can be a cause for false-positive results in fetal RHD genotyping with cell-free DNA in maternal plasma, and likewise the wrong fetal sex can be reported in the case of a male donor and a female fetus. Based on one of the cases we also recommend giving D- blood products to young female patients who receive a BMT of D- donors.

Novel alleles at the Kell blood group locus that lead to Kell variant phenotype in the Dutch population.

BACKGROUND: Alloantibodies directed against antigens of the Kell blood group system are clinically significant. In the Netherlands, the KEL1 antigen is determined in all blood donors. In this study, after phenotyping of KEL:1-positive donors, genotyping analysis was conducted in KEL:1,-2 donors to identify possible KEL*02 variant alleles. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 407 donors with the KEL:1,-2 phenotype were genotyped for the KEL*01/02 polymorphism, followed by direct sequencing of the KEL gene if the KEL*02 allele was detected. Two K0 patients were also included. Transcript analysis was conducted in two probands with the KEL*02. M05 allele defined by a synonymous mutation (G573G). Flow cytometry analysis to determine the expression of Kell antigen was performed. RESULTS: Thirty KEL:1,-2 individuals (30/407, 7.4%) with discrepant KEL*01/02 genotype were identified. Seven novel alleles were identified: KEL*02(R86Q, R281W)mod, KEL*02(L133P)null, KEL*02(436delG)null, KEL*02(F418S)null, KEL*02(R492X)null, KEL*02(L611R)null, and KEL*02(R700X)null. Nine variant alleles described before were detected: KEL*02N.06, KEL*02N.15, KEL*02N.17, KEL*02N.19, KEL*02N.21, KEL*02M.02, KEL*02M.04, KEL*02M.05, and KEL*02(Q362K)mod. A transcript lacking Exon 16 was identified in two probands with the KEL*02M.05 allele as described before. Finally, flow cytometry analysis showed a decreased total Kell expression and a relatively increased KEL1 expression in individuals with the KEL:1,2null or KEL:1,2mod phenotype, compared to KEL:1,2 controls. CONCLUSION: In 7.4% of a group of tested KEL:1,-2 Dutch donors, a KEL*02null or KEL*02mod allele was found. A relatively increased KEL1 antigen expression in KEL:1,2null and KEL:1,2mod individuals suggest that the expression of Kell-XK complexes depends on the availability of the XK protein.

Impact of genetic variation in the SMIM1 gene on Vel expression levels.

BACKGROUND: Serologic determination of the Vel- phenotype is challenging due to variable Vel expression levels. In this study we investigated the genetic basis for weak Vel expression levels and developed a high-throughput genotyping assay to detect Vel- donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In 548 random Caucasian and 107 Vel+(w) donors genetic variation in the SMIM1 gene was studied and correlated to Vel expression levels. A total of 3366 Caucasian, 621 black, and 333 Chinese donors were screened with a high-throughput genotyping assay targeting the SMIM1*64_80del allele. RESULTS: The Vel+(w) phenotype is in most cases caused by the presence of one SMIM1 allele carrying the major allele of the rs1175550 SNP in combination with a SMIM1*64_80del allele or in few cases caused by the presence of the SMIM1*152T>A or SMIM1*152T>G allele. In approximately 6% of Vel+(w) donors genetic factors in SMIM1 could not explain the weak expression. We excluded the possibility that lack of expression of another blood group system was correlated with weak Vel expression levels. Furthermore, using a high-throughput Vel genotyping assay we detected two Caucasian Vel- donors. CONCLUSION: Weak Vel expression levels are caused by multiple genetic factors in SMIM1 and probably also by other genetic or environmental factors. Due to the variation in Vel expression levels, serologic determination of the Vel- phenotype is difficult and a genotyping assay targeting the c.64_80del deletion in SMIM1 should be used to screen donors for the Vel- phenotype.

Molecular analysis of immunized Jr(a-) or Lan- patients and validation of a high-throughput genotyping assay to screen blood donors for Jr(a-) and Lan- phenotypes.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with anti-Jr(a) or anti-Lan are ideally transfused with rare Jr(a-) or Lan- red blood cells. We characterized mutations in Dutch Jr(a-) and Lan- individuals and developed a high-throughput genotyping assay to detect Jr(a-) and Lan- donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Six Jr(a-) and seven Lan- persons, who all made anti-Jr(a) or anti-Lan, were sequenced for ABCG2 or ABCB6 and the copy number of ABCG2 and ABCB6 was determined. A total of 3366 Caucasian, 621 black, and 333 Chinese donors were screened with a high-throughput screening assay targeting frequently occurring mutations causing the Jr(a-) or Lan- phenotype. RESULTS: In the six tested Jr(a-) individuals previously described, c.376C > T, c.706C > T, and c.736C > T nonsense mutations in ABCG2 were detected. In the seven Lan- individuals 12 different mutations, of which 10 underlie the Lan- phenotype, were detected. No copy number variation was detected for ABCG2 and ABCB6. The high-throughput screening assay detected five Caucasian donors heterozygous for the c.706C > T or 736C > T mutation in ABCG2 and nine Caucasian donors heterozygous for the 574C > T mutation in ABCB6. No black or Chinese donors were found positive for a mutation. CONCLUSION: We describe eight new mutations in ABCB6 of which seven, including three missense mutations, underlie the Lan- phenotype and determine that a complete gene deletion of ABCG2 or ABCB6 is not responsible for the Jr(a-) or Lan- phenotype, respectively. The extended heterogeneity of mutations causing the Jr(a-) or Lan- phenotype in most populations makes genetic screening for the Jr(a-) and Lan- phenotype inefficient in those populations.