Pathogenic role and diagnostic utility of interferon-α in histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis.

PURPOSE: Histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis (HNL) is an inflammatory disease of unknown etiology clinically characterized by painful lymphadenopathy. This study aimed to investigate the role of interferon (IFN)-α in the pathogenesis of HNL and the clinical significance of serum IFN-α levels for the diagnosis and monitoring of HNL disease activity. METHODS: This study enrolled 47 patients with HNL and 43 patients with other inflammatory diseases that require HNL differentiation including malignant lymphoma (ML), bacterial lymphadenitis, and Kawasaki disease. Expression of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) and MX1 in the lymph nodes was measured by real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and immunofluorescence staining, respectively. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to quantify serum cytokine levels. The results were compared with the clinical features and disease course of HNL. RESULTS: Patients with HNL had a significantly elevated ISG expression in the lymph nodes compared with those with ML. MX1 and CD123, a specific marker of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), were colocalized. In patients with HNL, serum IFN-α levels were significantly elevated and positively correlated with disease activity. The serum IFN-α level cutoff value for differentiating HNL from other diseases was 11.5 pg/mL. CONCLUSION: IFN-α overproduction from pDCs may play a critical role in HNL pathogenesis. The serum IFN-α level may be a valuable biomarker for the diagnosis and monitoring of disease activity in patients with HNL.

Serum interleukin-18 levels can improve the diagnostic performance of the PRINTO and ILAR criteria for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Recently, the Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO) has proposed revisions to the current International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) criteria for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (s-JIA). Interleukin (IL)-18 overproduction plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of s-JIA. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the PRINTO criteria compared with the ILAR criteria and determine whether serum IL-18 levels improve their diagnostic performances. METHODS: Overall, 90 patients with s-JIA and 27 patients with other febrile disease controls presenting with a prolonged fever of > 14 days and arthritis and/or erythematous rash were enrolled. The ILAR and PRINTO classification criteria were applied to all patients and examined with expert diagnoses. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used for measuring serum IL-18 levels. RESULTS: The PRINTO criteria had higher sensitivity but lower specificity than the ILAR criteria (sensitivity: PRINTO 0.856, ILAR 0.533; specificity: PRINTO 0.259, ILAR 0.851). With the addition of serum IL-18 levels ≥ 4,800 pg/mL, the sensitivity of the ILAR criteria and specificity of the PRINTO criteria were improved to 1.000 and 1.000, respectively. PRINTO plus serum IL-18 levels ≥ 4,800 pg/mL showed the highest value in Youden's index (sensitivity - [1 - specificity]). CONCLUSION: Serum IL-18 levels could improve the diagnostic performance of the PRINTO and ILAR criteria for s-JIA. The PRINTO criteria plus serum IL-18 levels ≥ 4,800 pg/mL could be the best diagnostic performance for s-JIA.

Evaluation of medication withdrawal in patients with non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis in Japan using a web-based survey.

OBJECTIVES: Although treatments for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) have seen considerable advancements, there remains a lack of clear guidelines on withdrawing medications. This study aimed to investigate the current strategies for discontinuing non-systemic JIA treatment. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire was distributed to members of the Pediatric Rheumatology Association of Japan. RESULTS: According to 126 responses, the most significant factors influencing JIA treatment tapering were the duration of clinically inactive disease, medication toxicity, and a history of arthritis flares. Respondents were often cautious about discontinuing medication if symptoms, e.g. 'morning stiffness' or 'intermittent joint pain', persisted. Among subtypes, oligoarticular JIA was more amenable to treatment tapering, whereas rheumatoid factor-positive polyarticular JIA proved less amenable. Most respondents started medication tapering after a continuous clinical inactive duration exceeding 12 months, and >50% of them required >6 months to achieve treatment discontinuation. Additionally, 40% of the respondents consistently underwent imaging before treatment tapering. CONCLUSIONS: The relative risks of treatment continuation and withdrawal should be considered, and decisions should be made accordingly. To obtain improved understanding of and more robust evidence for the optimal strategies for safely discontinuing JIA treatment, it is crucial to continue investigations including long-term outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of abatacept for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review assessed the efficacy and safety of abatacept in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: Studies published between 2000 and 2021 were searched using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ichushi-Web and clinical trial registries. The risk of bias was assessed according to the manual for development clinical practice guidelines by Minds, a project to promote evidence-based medicine in Japan. RESULTS: Seven observational studies were included. American College of Rheumatology pediatric 30/50/70 responses at 3, 6 and 12 months were 64.8%/50.3%/27.9%, 85.7%/71.4%/42.9% and 80.0%/50.0%/40.0%, respectively. Outcomes on systemic symptoms, joint symptoms and activities of daily living were not obtained. No macrophage activation syndrome or infusion reaction occurred. Serious infection occurred in 2.6% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Abatacept improved the disease activity index. In addition, abatacept was as safe as interleukin-6 (IL -6) and IL-1 inhibitors. However, both the efficacy and safety data in this systematic review should be reviewed with caution because their quality of evidence is low or very low. Further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of abatacept for systemic JIA, especially its efficacy on joint symptoms.

Efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review assessed the efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: Studies were searched using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ichushi-Web, and clinical trial registries (from 2000 to 2021). The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias version 2 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the manual for development clinical practice guidelines by Minds, a project promoting evidence-based medicine in Japan, for observational studies. RESULTS: One RCT and 22 observational studies were included. In the RCT on infliximab, the American College of Rheumatology pediatric (ACR Pedi) 30/50/70 responses at 14 weeks were 63.8%/50.0%/22.4%, with relative risks of 1.30 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94-1.79)/1.48 (95% CI: 0.95-2.29)/1.89 (95% CI: 0.81-4.40), respectively. In the observational studies, ACR Pedi 30/50/70 responses for etanercept at 12 months were 76.7%/64.7%/46.4%, respectively. Infliximab treatment caused anaphylaxis in 17% and an infusion reaction in 23% of patients. The incidence of macrophage activation syndrome, serious infection and malignancy caused by TNF inhibitors was 0%-4%. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, although TNF inhibitors were relatively safe, they were unlikely to be preferentially administered in patients with systemic JIA because of their inadequate efficacy. Further studies, particularly well-designed RCTs, are necessary to confirm the efficacy and safety of TNF inhibitors for systemic JIA.

Clinical significance of serum cytokine profiles for differentiating between Kawasaki disease and its mimickers.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical significance of serum cytokine profiles for differentiating between Kawasaki disease (KD) and its mimickers. METHODS: Patients with KD, including complete KD, KD shock syndrome (KDSS), and KD with macrophage activation syndrome (KD-MAS), and its mimickers, including multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, toxic shock syndrome, and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis infection, were enrolled. Serum levels of interleukin (IL)-6, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor type II (sTNF-RII), IL-10, IL-18, and chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 9 (CXCL9) were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and compared them with clinical manifestations. RESULTS: Serum IL-6, sTNF-RII, and IL-10 levels were significantly elevated in patients with KDSS. Serum IL-18 levels were substantially elevated in patients with KD-MAS. Patients with KD-MAS and KD mimickers had significantly elevated serum CXCL9 levels compared with those with complete KD. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that serum IL-6 was the most useful for differentiating KDSS from the others, IL-18 and CXCL9 for KD-MAS from complete KD, and CXCL9 for KD mimickers from complete KD and KD-MAS. CONCLUSION: Serum cytokine profiles may be useful for differentiating between KD and its mimickers.

Biologics for childhood systemic vasculitis.

Recent advances have allowed better understanding of vasculitis pathogenesis and led to more targeted therapies. Two pivotal randomized controlled trials, RITUXVAS and rituximab in ANCA-associated vasculitis (RAVE), provide high-quality evidence demonstrating rituximab (RTX) is efficacious in inducing remission in adult ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) patients compared with cyclophosphamide (CYC). RAVE also demonstrated superiority of RTX to oral CYC for induction of remission in relapsing disease. Disappointingly, the RTX regimen was not associated with reduction in early serious adverse events. At least nine randomized trials are in progress, aiming to further delineate optimal dosing and duration of RTX therapy in AAV. In particular, the 6-month interim results of the PEPRS trial provide encouraging data specific to children. Due to special concerns related to growth, preservation of fertility, and potential for high cumulative medication doses, children with AAV should be considered as candidates for RTX even as a first-line remission induction therapy. Two randomized clinical trials have defined the role of infliximab in Kawasaki disease (KD), which appears to be as an alternative to a second infusion of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for treatment-resistant disease. Support for other biologics in the treatment of AAV or for biologics in the treatment of other vasculidities is largely lacking due to either unimpressive trial results or lack of trials. Except for the KD trials and the PEPRS, trials enrolling children remain scant. This review touches on the key trials and case series with biologics in the treatment of vasculitis that have influenced practice and shaped current thinking.

Clinical Usefulness of T-Cell Receptor Vß Repertoire Analysis for Differentiating Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Japanese Children From Toxic Shock Syndrome and Kawasaki Disease.

The specific expansion of T-cell receptor ß chain variable region (TCR-Vß21.3 + ) CD4 + and CD8 + T cells was observed in Japanese patients with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. In contrast, these findings were not observed in patients with toxic shock syndrome and Kawasaki disease. T-cell receptor ß chain variable region repertoire analysis to detect specific expansion of Vß21.3 + T cells might be useful for differentiating multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children from toxic shock syndrome and Kawasaki disease.

Acute Rheumatic Fever and Kawasaki Disease Occurring in a Single Patient.

Kawasaki disease and acute rheumatic fever are two major causes of acquired heart disease in the pediatric population. Although both conditions are well-known entities, the association between them has never been described. We report herein a case of 6-year-old male patient who first presented with Kawasaki shock syndrome, followed by acute rheumatic fever 1 year later. In contrast to the prompt intervention given for atypical Kawasaki disease, in the present case the diagnosis was significantly delayed during the otherwise typical presentation of acute rheumatic fever. Our case highlights the difficulty experienced by many pediatricians in developed nations in diagnosing acute rheumatic fever due to its comparative rarity. To prevent diagnostic errors, all pediatricians should be alert to the possibility of acute rheumatic fever even if they are practicing in areas where it is not endemic.