Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 112(3): 153-161, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30594571

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Long PR intervals may increase cardiovascular complications, including atrial fibrillation. In pacemakers, the SafeR™ mode monitors PR intervals, switching from AAI to DDD when criteria for atrioventricular block are met. AIMS: The PRECISE study evaluated the incidence and predictors of long PR intervals and their association with incident atrial fibrillation after 1 year in patients implanted for sinus node dysfunction and free from significant conduction disorders at baseline. METHODS: This French, prospective, multicentre, observational trial enrolled patients implanted with a REPLY™ dual-chamber pacemaker. Pacemaker memory recorded long PR intervals (defined as first-degree atrioventricular block mode switches occurring after six consecutive PR/AR intervals≥350/450ms) and atrial fibrillation incidence (fallback mode switch>1minute/day). Predictors were identified from baseline variables (age, sex, AR and PR intervals, atrial rhythm disorder and medication) using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 291 patients with sinus node dysfunction enrolled, 214 were free from significant conduction disorders at baseline (mean age 79±8 years; 44% men; PR/AR intervals<350/450ms). After 1 year, long PR intervals had occurred in 116 patients (54%) and atrial fibrillation in 63 patients (30%). Amiodarone was the only independent predictor of long PR interval occurrence (odds ratio 2.50, 95% confidence interval 1.20-5.21; P=0.014). There was a strong trend towards an association between long PR interval and atrial fibrillation incidence (odds ratio 1.86, 95% confidence interval 0.97-3.61; P=0.051). CONCLUSIONS: Half of the patients with pure sinus node dysfunction developed long PR intervals in the year following pacemaker implantation. Amiodarone was the only independent predictor of long PR intervals. There was a strong trend towards an association between long PR intervals and incident atrial fibrillation.


Asunto(s)
Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Marcapaso Artificial , Síndrome del Seno Enfermo/terapia , Nodo Sinoatrial/fisiopatología , Potenciales de Acción , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amiodarona/uso terapéutico , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Bloqueo Atrioventricular/diagnóstico , Bloqueo Atrioventricular/epidemiología , Bloqueo Atrioventricular/fisiopatología , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Síndrome del Seno Enfermo/diagnóstico , Síndrome del Seno Enfermo/epidemiología , Síndrome del Seno Enfermo/fisiopatología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA