Memoir study: Investigating image memorability across developmental stages.

Images have been shown to consistently differ in terms of their memorability in healthy adults: some images stick in one's mind while others are forgotten quickly. Studies have suggested that memorability is an intrinsic, continuous property of a visual stimulus that can be both measured and manipulated. Memory literature suggests that important developmental changes occur throughout adolescence that have an impact on recognition memory, yet the effect that these changes have on image memorability has not yet been investigated. In the current study, we recruited adolescents ages 11-18 (n = 273, mean = 16) to an online visual memory experiment to explore the effects of developmental changes throughout adolescence on image memorability, and determine if memorability findings in adults can be generalized to the adolescent age group. We used the online experiment to calculate adolescent memorability scores for 1,000 natural images, and compared the results to the MemCat dataset-a memorability dataset that is annotated with adult memorability scores (ages 19-27). Our study finds that memorability scores in adolescents and adults are strongly and significantly correlated (Spearman's rank correlation, r = 0.76, p < 0.001). This correlation persists even when comparing adults with developmentally different sub-groups of adolescents (ages 11-14: r = 0.67, p < 0.001; ages 15-18: r = 0.60, p < 0.001). Moreover, the rankings of image categories by mean memorability scores were identical in both adolescents and adults (including the adolescent sub-groups), indicating that broadly, certain image categories are more memorable for both adolescents and adults. Interestingly, however, adolescents experienced significantly higher false alarm rates than adults, supporting studies that show increased impulsivity and reward-seeking behaviour in adolescents. Our results reveal that the memorability of images remains consistent across individuals at different stages of development. This consistency aligns with and strengthens prior research, indicating that memorability is an intrinsic property of images. Our findings open new pathways for applying memorability studies in adolescent populations, with profound implications in fields such as education, marketing, and psychology. Our work paves the way for innovative approaches in these domains, leveraging the consistent nature of image memorability across age groups.

Analytical Validation of a Webcam-Based Assessment of Speech Kinematics: Digital Biomarker Evaluation following the V3 Framework.

Introduction: Kinematic analyses have recently revealed a strong potential to contribute to the assessment of neurological diseases. However, the validation of home-based kinematic assessments using consumer-grade video technology has yet to be performed. In line with best practices for digital biomarker development, we sought to validate webcam-based kinematic assessment against established, laboratory-based recording gold standards. We hypothesized that webcam-based kinematics would possess psychometric properties comparable to those obtained using the laboratory-based gold standards. Methods: We collected data from 21 healthy participants who repeated the phrase "buy Bobby a puppy" (BBP) at four different combinations of speaking rate and volume: Slow, Normal, Loud, and Fast. We recorded these samples twice back-to-back, simultaneously using (1) an electromagnetic articulography ("EMA"; NDI Wave) system, (2) a 3D camera (Intel RealSense), and (3) a 2D webcam for video recording via an in-house developed app. We focused on the extraction of kinematic features in this study, given their demonstrated value in detecting neurological impairments. We specifically extracted measures of speed/acceleration, range of motion (ROM), variability, and symmetry using the movements of the center of the lower lip during these tasks. Using these kinematic features, we derived measures of (1) agreement between recording methods, (2) test-retest reliability of each method, and (3) the validity of webcam recordings to capture expected changes in kinematics as a result of different speech conditions. Results: Kinematics measured using the webcam demonstrated good agreement with both the RealSense and EMA (ICC-A values often ≥0.70). Test-retest reliability, measured using the absolute agreement (2,1) formulation of the intraclass correlation coefficient (i.e., ICC-A), was often "moderate" to "strong" (i.e., ≥0.70) and similar between the webcam and EMA-based kinematic features. Finally, the webcam kinematics were typically as sensitive to differences in speech tasks as EMA and the 3D camera gold standards. Discussion and Conclusions: Our results suggested that webcam recordings display good psychometric properties, comparable to laboratory-based gold standards. This work paves the way for a large-scale clinical validation to continue the development of these promising technologies for the assessment of neurological diseases via home-based methods.