Competing mortality in patients diagnosed with bladder cancer: evidence of undertreatment in the elderly and female patients.

BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer (BC) predominantly affects the elderly and is often the cause of death among patients with muscle-invasive disease. Clinicians lack quantitative estimates of competing mortality risks when considering treatments for BC. Our aim was to determine the bladder cancer-specific mortality (CSM) rate and other-cause mortality (OCM) rate for patients with newly diagnosed BC. METHODS: Patients (n=3281) identified from a population-based cancer registry diagnosed between 1994 and 2009. Median follow-up was 48.15 months (IQ range 18.1-98.7). Competing risk analysis was performed within patient groups and outcomes compared using Gray's test. RESULTS: At 5 years after diagnosis, 1246 (40%) patients were dead: 617 (19%) from BC and 629 (19%) from other causes. The 5-year BC mortality rate varied between 1 and 59%, and OCM rate between 6 and 90%, depending primarily on the tumour type and patient age. Cancer-specific mortality was highest in the oldest patient groups. Few elderly patients received radical treatment for invasive cancer (52% vs 12% for patients <60 vs >80 years, respectively). Female patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive BC had worse CSM than equivalent males (Gray's P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Bladder CSM is highest among the elderly. Female patients with high-risk tumours are more likely to die of their disease compared with male patients. Clinicians should consider offering more aggressive treatment interventions among older patients.

Suitability of PSA-detected localised prostate cancers for focal therapy: experience from the ProtecT study.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary screening for prostate cancer frequently identifies small volume, low-grade lesions. Some clinicians have advocated focal prostatic ablation as an alternative to more aggressive interventions to manage these lesions. To identify which patients might benefit from focal ablative techniques, we analysed the surgical specimens of a large sample of population-detected men undergoing radical prostatectomy as part of a randomised clinical trial. METHODS: Surgical specimens from 525 men who underwent prostatectomy within the ProtecT study were analysed to determine tumour volume, location and grade. These findings were compared with information available in the biopsy specimen to examine whether focal therapy could be provided appropriately. RESULTS: Solitary cancers were found in prostatectomy specimens from 19% (100 out of 525) of men. In addition, 73 out of 425 (17%) men had multiple cancers with a solitary significant tumour focus. Thus, 173 out of 525 (33%) men had tumours potentially suitable for focal therapy. The majority of these were small, well-differentiated lesions that appeared to be pathologically insignificant (38-66%). Criteria used to select patients for focal prostatic ablation underestimated the cancer's significance in 26% (34 out of 130) of men and resulted in overtreatment in more than half. Only 18% (24 out of 130) of men presumed eligible for focal therapy, actually had significant solitary lesions. CONCLUSION: Focal therapy appears inappropriate for the majority of men presenting with prostate-specific antigen-detected localised prostate cancer. Unifocal prostate cancers suitable for focal ablation are difficult to identify pre-operatively using biopsy alone. Most lesions meeting criteria for focal ablation were either more aggressive than expected or posed little threat of progression.

Health outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study.

BACKGROUND: Radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy are the two major therapeutic options for treating clinically localized prostate cancer. Because survival is often favorable regardless of therapy, treatment decisions may depend on other therapy-specific health outcomes. In this study, we compared the effects of two treatments on urinary, bowel, and sexual functions and on general health-related quality-of-life outcomes over a 2-year period following initial treatment. METHODS: A diverse cohort of patients aged 55-74 years who were newly diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer and received either radical prostatectomy (n = 1156) or external beam radiotherapy (n = 435) were included in this study. A propensity score was used to balance the two treatment groups because they differed in some baseline characteristics. This score was used in multivariable cross-sectional and longitudinal regression analyses comparing the treatment groups. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Almost 2 years after treatment, men receiving radical prostatectomy were more likely than men receiving radiotherapy to be incontinent (9.6% versus 3.5%; P:<.001) and to have higher rates of impotence (79.6% versus 61.5%; P:<.001), although large, statistically significant declines in sexual function were observed in both treatment groups. In contrast, men receiving radiotherapy reported greater declines in bowel function than did men receiving radical prostatectomy. All of these differences remained after adjustments for propensity score. The treatment groups were similar in terms of general health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: There are important differences in urinary, bowel, and sexual functions over 2 years after different treatments for clinically localized prostate cancer. In contrast to previous reports, these outcome differences reflect treatment delivered to a heterogeneous group of patients in diverse health care settings. These results provide comprehensive and representative information about long-term treatment complications to help guide and inform patients and clinicians about prostate cancer treatment decisions.

Factors associated with initial therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: prostate cancer outcomes study.

BACKGROUND: Because of the lack of results from randomized clinical trials comparing the efficacy of aggressive therapies with that of more conservative therapies for clinically localized prostate cancer, men and their physicians may select treatments based on other criteria. We examined the association of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics with four management options: radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, hormonal therapy, and watchful waiting. METHODS: We studied 3073 participants of the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study diagnosed from October 1, 1994, through October 31, 1995, with clinically localized disease (T1 or T2). Participants completed a baseline survey, and diagnostic and treatment information was abstracted from medical records. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with initial treatment. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Patients with clinically localized disease received the following treatments: radical prostatectomy (47.6%), radiation therapy (23.4%), hormonal therapy (10.5%), or watchful waiting (18.5%). Men aged 75 years or older more often received conservative treatment (i.e., hormonal therapy alone or watchful waiting; 57.9% of men aged 75-79 years and 82.1% of men aged 80 years and older) than aggressive treatment (i.e., radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy) (for all age groups, P

Follow-up prostate cancer treatments after radical prostatectomy: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Radical prostatectomy is one of the most commonly used curative procedures for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The probability that a patient will undergo additional cancer therapy after this procedure is largely unknown. PURPOSE: The objective was to determine the likelihood of additional cancer therapy after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Data for this study were derived from a linked dataset that combined information from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program and Medicare hospital and physician claims. Records were included in this study if patient histories met the following criteria: (a) residing in Connecticut, Washington (Seattle-Puget Sound), or Georgia (Metropolitan Atlanta); (b) having been diagnosed with prostate cancer during the period from January 1, 1985, through December 31, 1991; (c) undergoing radical prostatectomy by December 31, 1992; and (d) having no evidence of other types of cancer. Patients were considered to have had additional cancer therapy if they had had radiation therapy, orchiectomy, and/or androgen-deprivation therapy by injection after radical prostatectomy. The interval between the initial treatment and any follow-up treatment was calculated from the date of radical prostatectomy to the 1st day of the follow-up cancer therapy. All presented probabilities are based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 3494 Medicare patients, 3173 of whom underwent radical prostatectomy within 3 months of prostate cancer diagnosis. Although radical prostatectomy is often reserved for localized cancer, less than 60% (1934) of patients whose records were included in this study had organ-confined disease, according to final surgical pathology. Overall, the 5-year cumulative incidence of having any additional cancer treatment after radical prostatectomy reached 34.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 31.5%-38.5%). For patients with pathologically organ-confined cancer, the 5-year cumulative incidence was 24.3% (95% CI = 20.0%-29.3%) overall and ranged from 15.6% (95% CI = 9.7%-24.5%) for well-differentiated cancer (Gleason scores 2-4) to 41.5% (95% CI = 27.9%-58.4%) for poorly differentiated cancer (Gleason scores 8-10). The corresponding figures for pathologically regional cancer were 22.7% (95% CI = 12.0%-40.5%) and 68.1% (95% CI = 58.7%-77.1%). CONCLUSION: Further treatment of prostate cancer was done in about one third of patients who had had a radical prostatectomy with curative intent and in about one quarter of patients who were found to have organ-confined disease. IMPLICATIONS: Given the common requirement for follow-up cancer treatments after radical prostatectomy and the uncertainties about the effectiveness of the various follow-up treatment strategies, further investigation of these treatments is warranted.

Health outcomes after external-beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study.

PURPOSE: Studies reporting effects of radiotherapy for prostate cancer on sexual, bowel, and urinary function have been conducted primarily in referral centers or academic institutions. Effects of external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer among a population-based cohort were assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population included 497 white, Hispanic, and African-American men with localized prostate cancer from six US cancer registries who were diagnosed between October 1, 1994, and October 31, 1995, and treated initially with external-beam radiotherapy. They were interviewed at regular intervals, and medical records were reviewed. Distributions of responses for bowel-, urinary-, and sexual-related functions at 6, 12, and 24 months after diagnosis and adjusted mean composite change scores for each domain were analyzed. RESULTS: Declines of 28.9% in the sexual function score and 5.4% in the bowel function score occurred by 24 months, whereas at this time, the urinary function score was relatively unchanged. A total of 43% of those who were potent before diagnosis became impotent after 24 months. More than two thirds of the men were satisfied with their treatment and would make the same decision again. CONCLUSION: Sexual function was the most adversely affected quality-of-life domain, with problems continuing to increase between 12 and 24 months. Bowel function problems increased at 6 months, with partial resolution observed by 24 months. Despite the side effects, satisfaction with therapy was high. These results are representative of men in community practice settings and may be of assistance to men and to clinicians when making treatment decisions.

Quality-of-life outcomes after primary androgen deprivation therapy: results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study.

PURPOSE: To compare health-related quality-of-life outcomes after primary androgen deprivation (AD) therapy with orchiectomy versus luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists for patients with prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men (n = 431) newly diagnosed with all stages of prostate cancer from six geographic regions who participated in the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study and who received primary AD therapy but no other treatments within 12 months of initial diagnosis were included in a study of health outcomes. Comparisons were statistically adjusted for patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, timing of therapy, and use of combined androgen blockade. RESULTS: More than half of the patients receiving primary AD therapy had been initially diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer. Among these patients, almost two thirds were at high risk of progression on the basis of prognostic factors. Sexual function outcomes were similar by treatment group both before and after implementation of AD therapy. LHRH patients reported more breast swelling than did orchiectomy patients (24.9% v 9.7%, P <.01). LHRH patients reported more physical discomfort and worry because of cancer or its treatment than did orchiectomy patients. LHRH patients assessed their overall health as fair or poor more frequently than did orchiectomy patients (35.4% v 28.1%, P =.01) and also were less likely to consider themselves free of prostate cancer after treatment. CONCLUSION: Most endocrine-related health outcomes are similar after surgical versus medical primary hormonal therapy. Stage at diagnosis had little effect on outcomes. These results provide representative information comparing surgical and medical AD therapy that may be used by physicians and patients to inform treatment decisions.

Health-related quality of life among patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare the quality of life of men with advanced prostate cancer who are in remission receiving treatment with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist and flutamide or who are in progression. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey to measure health-related quality of life in a cohort of 113 patients with metastatic prostate cancer, 60 in remission and 53 with disease progression, using a battery of questionnaires, including the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30, the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey SF-36, and a prostate cancer-specific module. RESULTS: Patients in remission receiving an LHRH agonist and flutamide reported a significantly better quality of life compared with patients with disease progression (P < 0.011). Men with hormone-sensitive cancer had significantly less bodily pain, more vitality, more social interactions, and better mental health than patients with hormone-resistant disease. No differences were noted between the two groups concerning treatment-related problems such as diarrhea, constipation, urinary symptoms, sexual function, sexual satisfaction or hot flashes, although men in remission tended to rate each of these items more favorably than did men with disease progression. Men in remission have a health-related quality of life that is similar to an equivalent norm for men in the United States general population as compared with men with disease progression, who demonstrate significant compromise in all domains measured. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in remission receiving an LHRH agonist and flutamide have a quality of life that is indistinguishable from a matched male population without prostate cancer and a quality of life significantly better than that of men with androgen-resistant disease. Among patients who respond to total androgen ablation, flutamide and an LHRH agonist provide significant, measurable benefits to recipients independent of any possible improvement in longevity.

Assessment of the feasibility and impact of shared decision making in prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and patient impact of using standardized video presentations concerning alternative treatments for managing localized prostate cancer. METHODS: One hundred eleven men with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer were shown a video tape concerning the risks and benefits of four treatment options: radical surgery, external beam radiation, hormonal therapy, and watchful waiting. The impact of the video presentation was assessed using a questionnaire completed by the patient before and after viewing the video and again following a discussion with his treating physician. RESULTS: Patients demonstrated significant increases in their understanding of treatment options to manage prostate cancer after viewing the video presentation. Treating physicians confirmed the increased sophistication of their patients' knowledge of their disease and the potential outcomes associated with alternative treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized video presentations of treatment alternatives for prostate cancer can be incorporated into busy office practices. Both patients and physicians benefit from the increased level of understanding that allows physician/patient discussions to focus on the critical risk/benefit tradeoffs rather than simply describing treatment alternatives.

Angiogenesis and prostate cancer: in vivo and in vitro expression of angiogenesis factors by prostate cancer cells.

OBJECTIVES: Recently, it was confirmed that angiogenesis is important in the development and spread of a variety of human cancers, including prostate cancer (PCa). Tumor neovascularization is thought to be controlled by chemical signals, known as angiogenic factors (AF). To date, little is known regarding the existence and role of AF in PCa. We previously reported on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in PCa. Currently, we compare VEGF expression with that of interleukin-8 (IL-8), another putative regulator of angiogenesis. We evaluated the expression of these two important AF in PCa and explored the role of inflammatory cytokines IL-1 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in their regulation. METHODS: Ex vivo studies involved previously reported immunohistochemical analysis for VEGF and recent evaluation of IL-8 expression and distribution in archival tissue samples of PCa, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and normal prostate tissue. In vitro studies used PCa cells (DU-145) grown in culture and stimulated with cytokines thought to induce VEGF and IL-8 (ie, IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, TNF-alpha, and TNF-beta). After 24 hours, with or without cytokines, cell culture supernatants were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or radioimmunoassay for VEGF or IL-8 levels. RESULTS: Immunohistochemical studies of prostate tissue showed that PCa cells stained positively for VEGF and IL-8. Benign prostatic hyperplasia and normal prostate cells displayed little staining for either AF. Low levels of VEGF and IL-8 were produced by unstimulated DU-145 cells. Induction of DU-145 cells with cytokines resulted in differential stimulation whereby TNF was the predominant inducer of VEGF, whereas IL-1 was the predominant inducer of IL-8. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that significant levels of VEGF and IL-8 are present in PCa, but not BPH or normal prostate cells in vivo. In vitro studies suggest that differential regulation of AF expression occurs in PCa. Because IL-1 and TNF are present in the PCa tumor microenvironment, it is likely that differential regulation of AF also occurs in human PCa and contributes to differential tumor growth and metastasis.

Economic analysis of finasteride: a model-based approach using data from the Proscar Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the most common medical conditions in older men in the United States. BPH is often associated with a reduction in quality of life and may progress to acute urinary retention (AUR), the inability to pass any urine. Recently, a 4-year placebo-controlled clinical trial known as the Proscar Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study (PLESS) demonstrated that finasteride use reduces the risk of developing AUR by 57% and the need for BPH-related surgery by 55%. The economic implications of these findings were investigated using a model-based decision-analytic approach to compare finasteride with both watchful waiting and alpha-blocker therapy. The modeling used the longest-term published controlled data concerning alpha-blockers, which were for the alpha-blocker terazosin. The base case considered a 64-year-old man (the mean age of a PLESS patient) with prostatic enlargement on digital rectal examination and moderate-to-severe symptoms of BPH. The model suggested savings in surgical and AUR costs with finasteride versus watchful waiting, with an estimated 25% of total finasteride costs recouped in savings on surgical events avoided in the first year. Over 2 years, the expected cost per patient starting finasteride therapy was $2304, whereas the expected cost per patient starting terazosin was $2334. Analyses also explored the variation in economic results by baseline levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), a proxy for prostate volume. For patients with PSA levels > or =1.4 ng/mL, expected 2-year costs with finasteride and terazosin were $2342 and $2479, respectively. For patients with PSA levels > or =3.3 ng/mL, expected 2-year costs with finasteride were $373 less than with terazosin ($2347 vs $2720). Results were robust over a range of model assumptions and cost estimates. The analyses illustrate that all medical interventions, including watchful waiting, have associated costs. Finasteride shows cost offsets compared with watchful waiting and cost savings compared with terazosin over 2 years. Finasteride appears to be more economical in men with higher PSA levels.

Early-stage prostate cancer. When is observation appropriate?

The diagnosis of early-stage prostate cancer poses difficult management questions. Some clinicians recommend aggressive treatment strategies, whereas others suggest a more conservative approach. The controversy stems in part from the absence of randomized clinical trials that clearly document a net benefit of one treatment modality over another. From a clinician's perspective, the safest approach is to recommend an aggressive treatment such as surgery or radiation therapy. If it succeeds, the clinician claims a cure; if it fails, he has done everything possible. For patients, however, the choice of therapy should depend upon their assessment of the risks of disease progression versus the potential efficacy and risks associated with aggressive treatment options. Observation management appears to be most appropriate for older men who face minimal risk of disease progression. Men over age 65 with low-grade disease and/or minimal tumor volume, and men in their mid-seventies with low- to moderate-grade disease confined to the prostate, may decide that conservative management offers a low probability of prostate cancer-associated death without the potential for treatment-associated morbidity. Men who are at highest risk of disease progression may also wish to consider conservative management, because unfortunately neither radical surgery nor radiation therapy have been shown to be effective in controlling poorly differentiated disease. In these cases, some patients might feel that the morbidity associated with treatment is greater than the potential gain in longevity. Conservative management of younger patients with minimal comorbidities and relatively modest tumor volumes should be considered very cautiously. These patients are at significant risk of developing symptomatic disease and dying from prostate cancer, and they usually have the most to gain from either radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy.

Screening for prostate cancer is neither appropriate nor cost-effective.

Seen from a societal perspective, the health gains that might result from prostate screening are too uncertain to justify the substantial associated costs and adverse health effects. Clinicians who rely on observational screening studies to justify current screening practices should be aware of the potential biases that render conclusions suspect. Medical history documents numerous cases of medical interventions that appeared reasonable at the time, but ultimately proved worthless and even harmful. Before embarking on an ambitious screening program for prostate cancer, clinicians should demand that five basic criteria are satisfied: (1) that prostate cancer is a significant health burden, (2) that screening can identify localized disease, (3) that tests used in screening programs have acceptable performance among the population being tested, (4) that the potential for cure is greater among patients with screen-detected disease, and (5) that screen-detected patients have improved health outcomes compared with those who are not screened. Randomized trials provide the best methodology for determining the efficacy of screening and treatment. Clinicians are often too quick to credit medical intervention for successful outcomes and blame tumor biology for disease progression. Furthermore, when faced with a decision of administering or withholding therapy, physicians generally wish to err on the side of having done everything possible. Data modeling can provide critical insights concerning these issues using currently available information. Three recently published models suggest that the overall benefit to a population of men screened for prostate cancer can be measured in days of additional time of life gained, not months or years. Furthermore, models suggest that a substantial number of men need to undergo treatment in order to avert a single cancer death. The costs of implementing a screening program are enormous and deflect resources away from alternative uses, such as increased basic science funding to identify a cure for this disease. Therefore, based on the evidence presented, I believe that without more substantial data supporting the efficacy of screening programs, screening for prostate cancer is neither appropriate nor cost-effective.

Multiple-site physician practices and their effect on service distribution.

OBJECTIVE: This study explores the impact of multiple-site practices on the distribution of physician services within a medical service region. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: A questionnaire was mailed to all urologists (100 percent response rate) practicing in north central Connecticut (the Hartford medical service area) and adjacent communities in September 1990. Data on community characteristics were obtained from the 1990 U.S. census and state government documents. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive statistics and maps were used to summarize the attributes of single- and multiple-site practices and the communities where they were located. Key practice and community variables were analyzed. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: The questionnaires were coded and entered into a digital database with the tabulated community data. Responses of individual physicians were grouped by practice. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Multiple-site practices were common. Second-order sites accounted for 23 percent of total appointment capacity and were located in communities with higher than average elderly populations and incomes and lower than average minority populations. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of multiple-site practices is important for the accurate assessment of medical service availability. Further research is needed to document the functioning of multiple-site practices across other specialties and geographic areas.

Measuring contributions to the clinical mission of medical schools and teaching hospitals.

This is the final report of a panel convened as part of the Association of American Medical College's (AAMC's) Mission-based Management Program to examine the use of metrics (i.e., measures) in assessing faculty and departmental contributions to the clinical mission. The authors begin by focusing on methods employed to estimate clinical effort and calculate a "clinical full-time equivalent," a prerequisite to comparing productivity among faculty members and departments. They then identify commonly used metrics, including relative-value units, total patient-care gross charges, total net patient fee-for-service revenue, total volume per CPT (current procedural terminologies) code by service category and number of patients per physician, discussing their advantages and disadvantages. These measures reflect the "twin pillars" of measurement criteria, those based on financial or revenue information, and those based on measured activity. In addition, the authors urge that the assessment of quality of care become more highly developed and integrated into an institution's measurement criteria. The authors acknowledge the various ways users of clinical metrics can develop standards against which to benchmark performance. They identify organizations that are sources of information about external national standards, acknowledge various factors that confound the interpretation of productivity data, and urge schools to identify and measure secondary service indicators to assist with interpretation and provide a fuller picture of performance. Finally, they discuss other, non-patient-care, activities that contribute to the clinical mission, information about which should be incorporated into the overall assessment. In summary, the authors encourage the use of clinical productivity metrics as an integral part of a comprehensive evaluation process based upon clearly articulated and agreed-upon goals and objectives. When carefully designed, these measurement systems can provide critical information that will enable institutional leaders to recognize and reward faculty and departmental performance in fulfillment of the clinical mission.

Urologic 'nuisances': how to work up and relieve men's symptoms.

Common urologic complaints in the midlife man include bladder outlet obstruction, bladder hyperactivity, and large urinary output. Obstruction can result from benign prostate hypertrophy or some other problem distal to the bladder neck, such as urethral stricture. Hyperactivity can be induced by stress and caffeine or can suggest neurologic disease or bladder neoplasia. Large urinary output suggests excessive fluid intake, diabetes insipidus or mellitus, or mobilization of fluid from the use of diuretics or reclining at night. Sexual dysfunction may be caused by stress, but it is more often linked to peripheral vascular disease. Screening for prostate cancer is controversial; the benefit of PSA testing is most clear in patients at elevated risk (eg, due to race or family history).

Variations in coding practices among Connecticut urologists for the Medicare population.

As health care costs continue to rise, alternatives to the traditional fee for service system of physician reimbursement are being explored. Recently a resource-based relative-value system was enacted by Congress to correct some of the perceived inequities of Medicare reimbursement. Since reimbursement for evaluation and management services, also known as cognitive services, are based on Current Procedural Terminology (CPT-4) codes, we reviewed Medicare claims data for fiscal year 1986-87 to identify the coding habits of Connecticut urologists. We found that Connecticut urologist file 99% of their claims for cognitive services in one of six categories. Furthermore, we found that within these broad categories an average of 82% of the claims were filed under one primary practice specific code. The particular code selected, however, varied markedly between practices. Our data suggest that Connecticut urologists have adopted different standards for using CPT-4 codes and have adjusted for these differences through their fee schedules. These findings highlight the need for increased precision in CPT code definitions for cognitive services before they can be adapted to a reimbursement system based upon relative-value scales.

[Congenital tuberculosis. 2 case reports]. / Kongenit tuberkulose. To sygehistorier.

Two cases of congenital tuberculosis are presented and the literature is reviewed. One child survived without sequelae while the other survived but was severely handicapped. The importance of early diagnosis and treatment of this rare but serious manifestation of tuberculosis is emphasized.

[Surfactant treatment of newborn infants with respiratory distress syndrome primarily treated with nasal continuous positive air pressure. A pilot study]. / Surfaktantbehandling af nyfødte med respiratorisk distress-syndrom primaert behandlet med nasalt kontinuerligt positivt luftvejstryk. En pilotundersøgelse.

In this pilot study, Curosurf (200 mg/kg) was administrated to 34 patients with the respiratory distress syndrome in nasal-CPAP therapy with FiO2 requirements greater than 0.60 and/or TcPCO2 greater than 8 kPa. The surfactant was instilled during a short period of intubation or in a few cases via an intratracheal catheter (Ch. 6). The age of the patients on surfactant treatment ranged from two to 72 hours. Eighteen patients could be maintained on nasal-CPAP after treatment with Curosurf and only a few complications were seen in these infants. The other 16 patients subsequently required artificial ventilation and had a higher incidence of pulmonary and extrapulmonary complications. On the basis of these observations, we plan a randomized trial to investigate whether, administration of surfactant reduces the need for ventilator treatment and improves the odds for uneventful recovery in this category of patients.

Bone complications among prostate cancer survivors: long-term follow-up from the prostate cancer outcomes study.

BACKGROUND: To assess the relationship between androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) exposure and self-reported bone complications among men in a population-based cohort of prostate cancer survivors followed for 15 years after diagnosis. METHODS: The Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study enrolled 3533 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1994 and 1995. This analysis included participants with non-metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis who completed 15-year follow-up surveys to report development of fracture, and use of bone-related medications. The relationship between ADT duration and bone complications was assessed using multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: Among 961 surviving men, 157 (16.3%) received prolonged ADT (>1 year), 120 (12.5%) received short-term ADT (⩽ 1 year) and 684 (71.2%) did not receive ADT. Men receiving prolonged ADT had higher odds of fracture (OR 2.5; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-5.7), bone mineral density testing (OR 5.9; 95% CI: 3.0-12) and bone medication use (OR 4.3; 95% CI: 2.3-8.0) than untreated men. Men receiving short-term ADT reported rates of fracture similar to untreated men. Half of men treated with prolonged ADT reported bone medication use. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based cohort study with long-term follow-up, prolonged ADT use was associated with substantial risks of fracture, whereas short-term use was not. This information should be considered when weighing the advantages and disadvantages of ADT in men with prostate cancer.